kiloy13 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	If you’re a man and can’t find a partner, it’s just natural selection I never said it was explained by just "men having daughters". I was trying to get it through her head that slight disadvantages/inequality can lead to entire male lineages being wiped out. It was never as extreme as 1 in 17 men reproduced ever throughout human history. I think your source pretty much nails the main reason: Competition between patrilineal kin groups. Clans of men would compete and war, and one clan would end up winning allowing them to successfully spread their Y-chromosome whils…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/26 12:13 AM
22	If you’re a man and can’t find a partner, it’s just natural selection Is a woman getting raped and murdered also getting selected out of the gene pool?	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/05/26 01:57 PM
–	If you’re a man and can’t find a partner, it’s just natural selection They’re making the same fundamental mathematical mistake as you are. Some blog post with a bunch of misreading of the data is not a good source. It’s 1 out of 17 men left male descendants today, not 1 out 17 men bred. Learn the difference. Again many men bred but don’t have descendants today. Just because their Y chromosome isn’t present in today’s population doesn’t mean they didn’t have children. You must struggle with complex ideas a lot. This is going to cause you to be unsuccessful in life.	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/05/26 01:31 PM
6	If you’re a man and can’t find a partner, it’s just natural selection Wrong. Stop spouting misinformation. You don’t understand the math behind surname extinction. It’s 1 in 17 men’s lineages made it to the present, not 1 in 17 men had children. Think about this: a surname will go extinct if that lineage only has on average 0.99 sons. Even a slight disadvantage will cause a surname to go extinct eventually. Now understand that surnames act like Y-chromosomes, passed down father to son. This is the Galton-Watson Process. Was there inequality between men and women w…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/05/26 01:16 PM
4	If you’re a man and can’t find a partner, it’s just natural selection The claim that “1 man reproduced for every 17 women” is a misunderstanding of genetic data. What studies (like the 2015 Karmin et al. Y-chromosome bottleneck study) actually show is that far fewer male lineages survived to the present compared to female lineages. This is based on differences between Y-chromosome diversity (passed father → son) and mitochondrial DNA (passed mother → child). That’s very different from saying only a tiny fraction of men reproduced. A better way to think about it is…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/05/26 01:08 PM
–	After woman's so called 'hoe phase' in the end you are just the option she choose to settle down with right? Of course it’s an insecurity, but so what? Men want to feel secure in a relationship, and women have been hypergamous “monkey-branchers” since the dawn of humanity. It’s completely rational for men to feel insecure about a woman’s body count, which has been drilled into their psyche through hundreds of thousands of years of evolution.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/04/26 06:33 AM
1	Men are panicking more about being unmarried and childless than women Men remain fertile their whole lives. Sperm quality decrease is really overblown, mostly by old women	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/04/26 04:07 AM
0	Men are panicking more about being unmarried and childless than women The inflection point is at 30. After 40 most of the fertility decline has already occurred	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/04/26 08:34 PM
3	Men are panicking more about being unmarried and childless than women Yeah you can’t be poor and do it obviously	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/04/26 08:12 PM
3	Men are panicking more about being unmarried and childless than women <image> How would you describe the decline after 30?	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/04/26 07:59 PM
0	Men are panicking more about being unmarried and childless than women Worst case I’ll just pay for some woman’s egg and pay a surrogate to carry the child. Men are fertile our whole lives while women lose their fertility pretty rapidly linearly after 30, so men are chillin tbh	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/04/26 06:30 PM
–	Women’s willingness to date older is a massive advantage when it comes to dating young It’s going to be a battle royale for the few women worth marrying. Makes me sick to my stomach just thinking about it. I truly think being a passportbro is the only solution Side note: I always wonder what China is gonna be like in 15-30 years when their population is set to implode coupled with the tens of millions excess males they currently have. They’re fucked!	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/03/26 05:49 PM
–	Women’s willingness to date older is a massive advantage when it comes to dating young This is 100% true but you can go even further. Simply look at the population pyramid. Since men date younger and women date older, a healthy population pyramid where each generation is larger than the previous generation benefits men because there are more younger women to choose from. Now of course when a population pyramid gets fucked up, like what is happening in almost every country, this benefits women because there are less younger women compared to older men. This is why it was way easier…	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/03/26 05:34 PM
2	Age gap relationships are a bad deal for women Which jobs were women not allowed to do?	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/03/26 08:52 PM
1	Age gap relationships are a bad deal for women If she is younger, yeah	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/03/26 05:41 PM
1	Age gap relationships are a bad deal for women Wow so deep	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/03/26 03:21 PM
-1	Age gap relationships are a bad deal for women I mean who doesn’t want a successful partner but you don’t see men dating significantly more successful women en masse like you do of women dating successful men	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/03/26 02:24 PM
0	Age gap relationships are a bad deal for women This makes no sense. A woman’s fertility window is much smaller than a man’s. A world where younger men pair up with older woman is a world in which barely any babies are born ever. You women are arguing against biology. When one sex is infertile for half their life and the other isn’t, of course the more infertile sex is going to have to be the more younger in the relationship	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/03/26 02:16 PM
-3	Age gap relationships are a bad deal for women Agreed. And female power comes almost entirely from her youth and beauty.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/03/26 02:09 PM
2	Age gap relationships are a bad deal for women What rights did women not have that men did back when the average age gap was higher?	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/03/26 02:08 PM
2	Age gap relationships are a bad deal for women More egalitarian yet the older woman has more power. That’s impressive, you contradicted yourself immediately You’re also overthinking things. Women experience a much larger drop off in their value compared to men when they age. Thus no man dreams of marrying a woman his own age because it only serves to hurt himself in the future. It’s also low status to marry a woman that’s the same age as you. If a man can date younger, he will, and only high status men have the opportunity to do it.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/03/26 01:42 PM
2	Age gap relationships are a bad deal for women Dating your own age is something ugly and poor men do. The average age gap for most of human history, for the last 300,000 years, has been around 7-7.5 years. A lot of of your points are non issues and don’t apply to all age gap relationships (non relatability/different life stages) Loss of attraction also hurts women. Why would a 30 year old man want to start a relationship with a woman of the same age when all of her youthful years are behind her. A woman’s youth is more valuable than a man’s …	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/03/26 01:26 PM