TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kingfalconpunch Archive

View 0 posts and 57 comments by kingfalconpunch on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

He kinda did, but not any more than she did! He threw me to the ground once, and never hit us or anything like that. My mom was an absolute psycho, and next to impossible to live with. I say mildly true because it didn't bother me all that badly. Now that he's single, my dad is an entirely different man. She's still crazy.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 10:47 PM
1

But I do see her at least once weekly, and on holidays.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 04:21 PM
2

We haven't really discussed it much. Frankly, at this point, my plan is to go to college far away and never return
/r/MensRights29/11/13 03:58 PM
2

Yeah, it blows my mind.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 04:08 AM
8

I've no clue why I did.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 03:39 AM
31

Haha it ain't this hard. You can do much more sinister stuff, like my mom did. She made me go see a therapist to whom she had previously spoken specifically to get me to hate my dad. She threw my dad out and gave him only an opened can of sardines and a trial bottle of hot sauce. Apparently that's all he owned after 18 years. She then filed for food stamps despite having taken $10K from a joint savings account, was caught, and had no penalties leveraged against her. He pays her a fortune now, so…
/r/MensRights29/11/13 01:32 AM
5

Hey, condescend all you want. It's not us who are wrong, and safe inside our CASTLE. Hint hint, leftist!
/r/MensRights24/11/13 05:18 AM
-4

Well obviously! A gynecologist working on an anal cancer study is basically as good/legal an anal-qualified doctor working on the same study. I mean, if there's funding, it's all kosher, right?
/r/MensRights23/11/13 09:33 PM
1

My question, is why is this men's rights? Women don't even have prostates to get cancer in, they wouldn't claim we don't need the care or anything...
/r/MensRights23/11/13 07:25 PM
-1

I feel it's more that she lacks accreditation for treating men as a gynecologist. It's less limiting her ability to treat men, than it is making sure she is working in the field for which she studied. Like keeping dentists from doing brain surgery.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 07:12 PM
1

But I see what you mean.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 02:54 AM
1

That's entirely different, there's no doubt that consent was never given in that situation.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 02:52 AM
0

I don't think its really acceptable to charge someone with rape if you were inebriated. It was your fault for drinking to excess as much as it was theirs for doing it. However, just because his body is capable of acting while under the influence of alcohol doesn't really mean he was able to consent willfully.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 12:25 AM
1

I read this and wonder if he wishes he'd stayed with the long distance girlfriend.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 11:37 PM
2

Not necessarily. The whole "you can't rape the willing" doesn't really fly. Like if I tell you I'll kill you if you don't have sex with me, and you have sex with me, were you not actively participating?
/r/MensRights21/11/13 11:36 PM
7

Exactimundo. The only men's rights component is that she had gotten off free
/r/MensRights17/11/13 07:20 PM
306

Why would he kill someone? His incarceration is of his own stupidity, but the woman needs to serve time for this as well.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 02:43 PM
1

I suggest you read what I said
/r/MensRights12/11/13 05:06 PM
1

The issue was not with the cost of birth control for one person. It is the cost of birth control for an entire countru
/r/MensRights12/11/13 03:15 PM
1

Your last statement makes no sense. What is birth control for? Recreational sex. Recreational sex is a choice. Not my problem
/r/MensRights12/11/13 03:14 PM
1

Show me where covering millions of people's contraception will cost me $100. And if it's so cheap, let them pony up to the cost of what is their choice
/r/MensRights12/11/13 02:36 PM
1

10% chance. There are worse things in the world than being unwanted.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 11:33 AM
1

Oh, well pardon me, I guess I should pay for people who are too morally ignorant to understand the complications of their actions
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:03 PM
1

Your idea of responsible sexual behavior and mine are vastly different, hence our differing views. I don't see letting parents have their kids paid for guilt free as a good deterrent to actually abstaining from sex until you can actually care for you own child. I mind my money being spent on people making bad decisions, because I have been able to avoid these bad decisions and secure my own life.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 07:58 PM
1

Not covering either is the most fiscally sensible approach. Yeah it sucks for whoever has the kid, but maybe that should've been a consideration before having sex.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 07:44 PM
0

Or we could stop covering them all-the wisest argument fiscally.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 07:38 PM
0

So I need to foot someone's IUD bill on the chance that they might be having sex too frequently and possibly forget to use a condom? IUDs can have awful side effects, by the way. Happened to my sister.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 07:33 PM
1

And it costs about a hundred bucks a year for its lifespan, and is comparably cheaper than condom use over that amount of time. And yet I still need to cover this for other people?
/r/MensRights11/11/13 07:24 PM
-2

So let's take car accidents for instance. Some people can't afford cars with advanced safety features like radar predictive braking. Surely it's cheaper to buy everyone a new Volvo with radar predictive braking than it is to cover the medical bills.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 07:10 PM
-4

So we need to give people in bad situations expensive birth control to forestall covering them later?
/r/MensRights11/11/13 06:57 PM
0

Job done
/r/MensRights11/11/13 06:31 PM
-4

Condoms cost what, like a dollar a piece? They aren't hard to find/purchase.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 06:30 PM
1

That's what they claim. Yet the fact remains, single men don't need it, and are going to have to pay for it. As are gays, the elderly, religious groups, etc. If insurance companies thought it cheaper to force everyone to get birth control, don't you think it would've been done before now?
/r/MensRights11/11/13 06:29 PM
0

...Yeah, so if I never get a surgery, I get reimbursed the fees I pay towards my insurance company, right? Oh wait, no, that's not how it works!
/r/MensRights11/11/13 06:27 PM
8

Insurance companies like it because now gay people are paying for it, lesbians are paying for it, married families unconcerned with birth control are paying for it, elderly people are paying for it, and church groups against birth control are paying for it. I can't imagine why insurance companies approve of this...
/r/MensRights11/11/13 06:27 PM
0

It benefits the country as a whole. Why do women get pregnant with kids they don't want? It is because both women and men place far too much importance upon "getting" sex. Women have kids expressly to get welfare benefits. They sucker men into paying them child support and such. It is a problem on both sides of the aisle. It is not an issue of ignoring sociatal pressures and covering it with a prophylactic band-aid. This is what I said. You mat consider scrolling two inches further down the page…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 06:21 PM
0

No, that is entirely ignorant of everything I just said.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 06:04 PM
1

It benefits the country as a whole. Why do women get pregnant with kids they don't want? It is because both women and men place far too much importance upon "getting" sex. Women have kids expressly to get welfare benefits. They sucker men into paying them child support and such. It is a problem on both sides of the aisle. It is not an issue of ignoring sociatal pressures and covering it with a prophylactic band-aid.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 06:00 PM
0

I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to say. Grammar and spelling! Not to be rude I am just incapable of understanding your post
/r/MensRights11/11/13 05:40 PM
0

Or we could just pay neither...
/r/MensRights11/11/13 04:41 PM
2

Yeah, it is not my job to subsidize recreational sex.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 04:41 PM
3

?
/r/MensRights09/11/13 06:49 PM
-8

Because women are worthless as soldiers? Women mixed with men in the military has always lead to bad consequences.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 04:48 PM
2

Wow, how odd! We mustn't be looking at the same damned ad, because I didn't read the words "hunt men" anywhere on that! How should they learn to shoot? By killing real people? Or by hunting? A lot of the men's rights crowd are just self-important whiners who debase the whole crowd.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 07:57 PM
5

This is a targeted ad. More men than women take to shooting naturally. This is an attempt to breach a new market, and protect women. Who's to say that the aggressor is male? To say it's male is an assumption and nothing more.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 07:55 PM
1

I suppose!
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:04 AM
1

More safe to be cautionary anyway!
/r/MensRights26/10/13 12:12 AM
1

Too bad the example he used within the first couple minutes of the video is a case where she may veryvwell have waived her fifth amendment rights by starting and then ending a statement. You cannot pick and choose what you say in a court of law, only to say everything or nothing.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 07:16 PM
8

This whole "wage inequality" shit pisses me off. Women earn less because they work less! They take time to raise kids, take maternity leave.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 12:43 AM
1

Still funny to mention in any case!
/r/MensRights15/10/13 08:02 PM
4

And I should note that while this is OK, it is not OK to profile middle eastern men of an Islamic background when looking for terrorists.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:16 PM
6

Violation of the Geneva convention's rules on group punishment. America is technically at war so...
/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:15 PM
48

My mom threw my father and I out. She gave him a can of sardines (opened) and an opened trial bottle of hot sauce as the only things he owned when she threw him out. She filed for food stamps and welfare, got it, was audited, and they found out she was not eligible because she had tons of cash. That money was ten grand stolen from a joint account between them before she threw my father out. She petitioned to have my sister forced to go to a college that she didn't want to go to under the pretens…
/r/MensRights11/10/13 08:18 PM
1

Oh don't even get me started on the miserable situation that is American divorce. I have some fucking stories to tell!
/r/MensRights09/10/13 09:59 PM
3

The government also says that exceeding posted speed limits is illegal. So it never happens, right? It is also illegal to trespass, so it never happens, right?
/r/MensRights04/10/13 08:02 PM
2

Being 17 (very nearly 18) with a 15 year old girlfriend, this sort of mentality has made me fearful to be intimate with her. Is it justified?
/r/MensRights04/10/13 07:32 PM
-2

My experience with domestic abuse is that all women I've ever seen "abused" did it as a way to get back at the husbands that they wanted to divorce.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 04:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter