TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kinghfb Archive

View 0 posts and 35 comments by kinghfb on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Can we please not turn this sub into a SRS-esque downvote brigade?
/r/MensRights15/12/12 11:50 PM
2

They delete threads on polarising issues if they degenerate into a flame war, which is what I'm assuming it did.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 08:23 AM
2

The Daily Mail is renowned for being a worthless stain on the face of journalism. Anything it produces should be completely disregarded.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 05:44 AM
10

Two consenting but otherwise underage people would fall into this category and is possibly the most common example of this. Ridiculous.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 04:59 AM
2

Exactly. There are jokes about every conceivable topic, and kicking up a stink about something that's clearly (supposed) to be funny is really not constructive.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 03:09 AM
1

None of what you said is relevant. Women aren't prevented from joining the army, they just choose not to. I certainly wouldn't choose to. In fact, only the disabled are prevented in some manner, and even then they can still get a desk job. I can't tell you why it's mostly men that think it's a great idea to join the army, but you can't say it's because we're forced into it by women.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:46 PM
1

This smacks entirely of "you should be grateful for what you have". You can't say feminists abuse these freedoms while casually glossing over freedoms abused by every other group. (2nd Amendment, anyone?) It's entirely crap. Reddit is a testament to how much this freedom you defend so is abused, not feminism.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:34 PM
-6

Aaaaaand in Australia we don't have conscription. There are a more than a few other countries in the world that fought in the war (and lost their fair share of men). This picture is completely irrelevant now, especially to us (Australia). Women were disallowed from enlisting back in the day (at least for us) by... *gasp * an all-male government. This picture is complete hogwash and just dilutes the valid points MR is trying to make.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 10:44 AM
-3

With? The tone was perhaps a little harsh, but claiming that religion has done more harm than feminism is more than 100% bang on the money. Show me how many millions of people have suffered under feminism throughout human history and I'll change my opinion in a hearbeat.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:33 AM
1

Not a tl;dr, but a summary nonetheless: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/11fnbr/can_we_discuss_this_video/c6m6fpp
/r/MensRights15/10/12 04:01 AM
1

I can't argue with a subjective statement so there's no point in starting. Objectively, the spelling and language is terrible. That's all there is to it
/r/MensRights14/10/12 09:00 PM
1

No, it's still trash.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:25 AM
5

Did anyone actually read the article? It's terribly written and is pretty much an inaccurate blow-by-blow of what happened with incendiary language tossed in for good measure. First of all, Labor opposed the sacking of Slipper as speaker not because they were supporting him (and his remarks, as it's claimed), but because doing so would set a dangerous precedent. The government doesn't just kick out the speaker every other day. Secondly, the headline and opening paragraph do little to frame the r…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 05:43 AM
4

For the third time in a week? Probably not. The opposition leader is a complete twat and treats women the same way they were treated in the 50s. If you're trying to make a Men's Rights point, you've probably picked the wrong video for it. She's completely in the right here. Source: I'm an Australian that follows politics. EDIT: Because there are a number of replies in here asking what is going on (and also spouting some seriously misinformed opinions), here is the actual story: There was a motio…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 05:28 AM
2

Too many typos to even begin to take seriously, not to mention the spartan vocabulary made up primarily of various forms of "fuck".
/r/MensRights14/10/12 04:23 AM
3

That's not how the Internet works
/r/MensRights13/10/12 11:58 PM
8

This should've been the OP instead of the screenshot.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 10:19 PM
0

Just a question - do you agree or disagree with the "ban" on these domains?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 11:57 AM
-4

You want links to the actual study but then you go on to extrapolate hidden meaning according to your own interpretation? By all means raise hell if they explicitly say something like "all men are bastards" but as soon as you're pulling barely there meaning from the text you undermine the entire point of men's rights. Pick your battles etc
/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:44 AM
3

Fair.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 02:39 AM
-3

What's the difference? When people go to view the image on the FB page, all they're seeing is negativity. The image is designed to be an easily parsed piece of information. Errors aside, the message is delivered successfully. The focus is being artificially shifted on their page by some very militant activists. Whatever happened to "pick your battles"?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 01:56 AM
2

If it's a problem, then you can just hit "block". Alternatively, delete the thread.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 01:46 AM
2

Not everyone who disagrees with you is a troll. Go read my comment history and you'll see that I've defended common sense in the past against wilful ignorance.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 01:18 AM
-5

No, the beef is about some perceived slight against the male race. In some ham-fisted attempt at raising awareness for Men's Rights, you've hijacked a poorly executed attempt at assisting women in less developed countries. While the stats may or may not be completely accurate, shitting all over a campaign promoting education simply because it isn't gender-equal enough for you is, frankly, ridiculous and counter-productive. Very much "cutting off your nose to spite your face." How about instead o…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 12:53 AM
-3

In no way are they doing that
/r/MensRights11/10/12 12:32 AM
2

Psycho parents don't discriminate.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 10:08 PM
0

Possibly the only reasonable attitude to take.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 10:06 PM
3

From OP: "feminism" is actually synonymous with "gender egalitarianism" If that really were the case, would you feel better/worse/the same about feminism in general/possibly be willing to consider yourself a feminist if you don't already? Why or why not? Are you for gender equality or not? Your post makes sense by itself when you ignore the question posited by the OP, but it sounds to me like you'd be fighting against feminism rather than taking a more reasonable, level-headed stance in fighting…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 10:01 PM
1

As long as growing a beard/mo means you're also running your own little fundraising effort. I've been doing this for the last 3-4 years but always have a donation page for my efforts. People that don't are missing the point.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:57 PM
-12

What the hell is wrong with you? This is a completely acceptable campaign. The reason that there is so much of a problem with education in females is because of ancient patriarchal bullshit that divides purely on gender lines. This campaign is attempting to highlight this discrepancy and help raise the overall rates of education. You don't think educating women is a good idea in countries that have otherwise kept them in the dark? When your country prevents 50% of the population from obtaining a…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:41 PM
1

Am I the only one that saw this as terribly written satire? It's in an indie Florida digital newspaper. They have dipshits submitting articles daily to their overpaid, under-educated editor. The "what-if" argument doesn't even apply here, because anyone with rocks in their heads will realise this is clearly a poor attempt at humour. If you want an example of why "what-if" doesn't apply, look to any modern comedian's take on rape (female victim), and you can see that - in the context of comedy - …
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:26 PM
1

"Make an honest woman" In reference to the fact that Abbott is married with children, and Gillard is not. She has also been described as "remaining deliberately barren" in regards to her decision to not have children.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:03 PM
2

Don't attempt misdirection. Your backwards thinking bullshit will die and your kind will be forgotten.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:58 PM
1

Except that he speaks his mind as if women are to be spoken for instead of listened to. Unless you consider his stance on women being "housewives" not misogynistic? More to the point: "Mysogynistic" isn't the "hatred" of the class, it is the more general idea that women are of a lesser class (i.e. you are superior), similar to the way racism takes hold. Feel free to be wrong as much as you like on this. Also feel free to keep fighting against unfair custody battles and unisex bathrooms, but don'…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 11:17 AM
12

What the hell is wrong with you? Do you even live in Australia? Do you even follow the news or politics at all? Your title indicates to me that you are a complete dolt. This is not even in the same postcode as "men's rights". Every single line she served Abbott was truly deserved, and she is 100% correct in slamming him the way she did. If you bothered to watch the video the whole way through, you will hear Gillard pull out select quotes from Abbott's recent political career in which he takes qu…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter