TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kinsey3 Archive

View 5 posts and 15 comments by kinsey3 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

I doubt there's any need to wonder. Even if the argument were airtight (which it isn't, even if it is roughly accurate), there would be a lynch mob.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 09:32 AM
4

I'm happy to report that in pursuing my Master of Arts in Teaching degree, there are about as many men as women in the program. I know this is far from universally the case, but I'd like to think that the incoming population of new teachers is beginning to shift towards a more gender-balanced ratio.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 10:34 PM
5

I know that effeminacy in men was very poorly regarded by the Greeks (they could get quite worked up trying to figure out who was a kinaidos), but the practice of pederasty was thought to improve the masculinity and moral character of young men. Women's sexuality was regarded as the source of a range of pathological issues (e.g. hysteria), but Sappho's poetry speaks of attractions to both men and women, and was well regarded. I can't recall ever hearing of anyone in ancient Greece who actually l…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 02:16 AM
17

Drag queens, bears, and lesbians are often seen as the guardians of the LGBT community.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 05:54 PM
1

Thanks for the input. I thought it was way too over-the-top as a headline (the kind of thing that gives feminists a nice strawman to beat up). I think fatherless homes are an indicator of likely delinquency (though to my mind socioeconomic factors probably have more of a causal effect on both fatherlessness and delinquency), but I wanted to get an opinion that would be level-headed, rather than a gut reaction to the inflammatory headline.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 06:04 AM
2

That's true for "circumcised" vs. "uncircumcised", and it does sound very technical/medical, which in developing countries can bias people towards it (see the ridiculous popularity of baby formula over breast milk in some countries, because, uh, science?), when in fact circumcision (apart from extraordinary cases) has no real medical benefit. In terms of my own personal preference, I usually go with "cut" vs. "uncut". I mean, who wants to be cut? Besides, it's more casual and more easily underst…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 11:03 PM
6

Ok, so I'm intact. Fine word. Nothing wrong with it except that most people will have no idea what you're talking about, so it's mostly a good way of turning the conversation into being about your penis. Again, nothing particularly wrong with that either. Etymologically, however, "intact" is just as much a negative formation as "uncut". While it has come to mean "whole", its formation is parallel to "untouched", which is not always the best thing to say about your penis. Also, no one is going to…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 09:20 PM
2

This is definitely a trend in relationship advice. The most balanced advice I've found is from Dan Savage.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:24 PM
10

Thanks
/r/MensRights08/08/12 09:38 PM
15

Does anyone have a picture of the posters?
/r/MensRights08/08/12 09:08 PM
3

Yeesh, talk about ignorant and sex-negative. Of course I agree it's important to disclose bisexuality (or any other salient point of sexual identity) to a partner before you enter into a serious, committed relationship, lest you wind up in a relationship with someone like this. Still, pity this bigot's poor husband if he ever expresses an interest in exploring prostate stimulation. Biphobia makes my blood boil; time to de-stress with satirical humor: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-4w6NqfLAc
/r/MensRights05/10/11 10:00 PM
1

With regard to religious schools and charities the above Supreme Court opinion is perfectly appropriate, but with regard to medical practice I think a different tact needs to be taken in the good ol' US of A. Namely, defunding. As I understand it, the first amendment is generally regarded as a limitation upon government, to restrict the ability of government to place limitations upon religious expression. So rather than try to restrict the ability of monotheists to enact their barbaric religious…
/r/MensRights06/08/11 09:40 AM
7

I actually find my foreskin far more useful and valuable than either of my little fingers.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 04:24 AM
7

If you had any memory of having your foreskin, I suspect your opinion would be different as to whether its removal (for no medical reason) constitutes mutilation.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 03:47 AM
21

Infant genital mutilation is unconscionable. I don't quite understand why there's any debate over this. There are cases where circumcision is medically necessary, though they are few, and rarely found in infants. The only other reason is cultural/religious ritual, which in every case (barring Judaism), has been roundly deemed barbaric. Frankly, if San Francisco Jews want to go on mutilating their sons' genitals in the manner to which their nomadic ancestors were accustomed, they can have the rab…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 03:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter