TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kiros_winstone Archive

View 1 posts and 122 comments by kiros_winstone on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

Questionskiros_winstone/r/MensRights01/12/15 03:47 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Agreed
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 04:28 AM
1

Your spouting advice that are going to see a lot of men hurt in dating. Please stop. What you think you want, is complete opposite to what your biological brain desires. Dominance. I’ve seen feminist fuck the brains out of the exact type they bitch and complain about. So please, stop giving advice to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 02:20 AM
1

Lol wat
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 02:17 AM
1

One other thing to add to that list, Looking at intrinsic values instead of extrinsic, not seeing men as usable fuck objects that simply serve to provide. Good luck meeting that criteria.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/21 03:24 AM
2

I’m 5’4, I know it lowers my smv. Doesn’t stop me from having confidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/21 03:08 AM
1

If you say so, every woman thinks their high quality, hence why the dating market has crashed due to excessive Female narcissism having these extensive list of requirements. What they don’t understand, is that unlike women it’s insanely difficult in the economic market for men to attain these traits they seem expect, women can simply lie and manipulate their way through the workforce and ‘get fit’. Men have to slave, work themselves to death and sacrifice a lot knowing we are second class citize…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/21 03:07 AM
9

Then those men aren’t doing it right. Chads don’t care if they give you an orgasm or not, guys with seeming low smv are far more likely to spend their time pleasing than just pumping and dumping like fucking chad and Tyrone.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/21 02:56 AM
1

Both genders are superficial, if a call can’t look after her health with gluttony no attraction will occur, same with men. Now, a fit attractive women may entice some well fit chad, but generally the fitness is merely a mating strategy to web a similar high ‘quality’ male. Key word - quality. It’s a deceptive tactic. Mgtow has nothing to do with women, that’s men saying enough is enough, leave us alone. FDS is all about man bashing and trying to find that elusive big dick energy. And manipulatin…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 02:24 PM
2

Wow, you’ve just confirmed my point about women’s complete lack of a moral compass. Like most women, lying and deceit are not only justified, but necessary evil. Adam and Eve all over again, must be why biblical accounts of women’s desire to tempt are so accurate. You haven’t proved any points, just a lack of self awareness. It’s why working with women in the workplace is so dangerous, you act on emotion not logic, which results in constantly changing narratives to justify often cold and callous…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 02:08 PM
1

If you say so
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 01:58 PM
2

They’re not hypothetical, there based on verified data from countless divorces where it’s in the wahmens best financial interest. Since again, it’s all about what women can get and use to serve their interest. And they are fucking masters at indirect and subtle means of getting what they want. Children, money, higher positions. The fact you’re getting so defensive shows that I’m revealing aspects of female nature that you’d like hidden from men. Why do you think the red pill and mgtow movement i…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 11:44 AM
3

Yes, until you decide it’s in your best interest to take it all because ‘you deserve it’. And with cognitive dissonance and zero accountability, you wouldn’t blink an eye when things start to get tough and you want out. But you know this, you’re just playing games.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 11:38 AM
4

Like most men? The difference is you’re interpreting ambition with your greed, in the hopes these resources will benefit YOU, not him. Most women should be content that a man simply has a job, regardless of status. But that’s not good enough because he needs to satisfy YOUR needs, and women’s needs are endless meaning they can never be satisfied. This isn’t open for debate, it’s just female nature that’s running rampant by bitter feminists that know it’s a great tactic to shame men into submissi…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 11:32 AM
0

Men are hardwired into this, it’s basic evolutionary psychology. The same with women just wanting fucking resources and seeing men as disposable tools. I see hard working blue pilled men cower to their wives, work themselves to death, then see them get tossed out when the girl finds a new prey ahem ‘partner’ she thinks is worthy of her golden vagina. Shit reads like a basic manuscript. Worse is when the guy has kids and gets absolutely destroyed in the legal system. Some don’t recover and just k…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 09:33 AM
4

No, you want shared resources with the intention of growing those resources. It’s strategic, ALL women are. Women are just getting more defensive because their natural mating tactics are now being exposed. Eventually, when push comes to shove and he’s of no use (I.e financial loss, job loss, etc) your hypergamy will kick in. We all know where that leads. Just a heads up, men know what the codeword for ambitious means. That gives away your little secret.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 09:22 AM
2

Fit, attractive women aren’t determining factors for quality lol..fucking hell the self awareness of women these days, Head back to FDS you’ll fit right in 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 09:11 AM
2

For now. The fact you relish in saying ‘my fiancé’ is so incredibly conceded. Want to know the statistics on divorce filed by women? Edit: oh god, just saw your reddit name. Haha I love when I’m right 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 02:36 AM
1

Just takes practice my dude, exposure in social settings is the key
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 02:36 AM
1

And and I’m sure he ‘has a lot going for him’. What is it with women and seeking ambitious I.e code word for money. It really does show supreme shallowness and greediness of women
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 09:48 PM
5

In the future, I envision gattaca where they gene splice every male to be 6’2 and every women to be a petite stick at 5’2. It’s like the perfect world of dense superficiality.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 09:45 PM
0

Dude, that’s a lie. Yes, it lowers your perceived smv on the surface, but there are plenty of women that would fuck and or date you. Do NOT be insecure
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 09:37 PM
4

Nope, common girl. Then another girl I met who opened up to me at work and said she was secretly fucking a guy every other day while she was already in a relationship. I was blue pulled at the time. After that, I never trusted how girls appear to be on the surface. They have lying down to an art form. They’re also masters at communicating, something most men struggle with which makes them easy prey if you don’t understand female nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 01:13 PM
1

Girl of my dreams, I’m swooning
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 01:07 PM
3

Mate, do it. You live once, have fun. Plenty of women go on girls nights and end up fucking chad who probably had his dick wet in 5 different women that week. There was an research article showing that women were the most commonly tested for std’s. That basically reflects what’s happening with hookup culture and women having an all you can eat dick buffet, especially if their going for the top 20%. Girls, ffs just choose a normal average guy. Stop being so selective and learn to settle for less.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 01:06 PM
1

But guys aren’t going to openly admit (same with women) a high n-count. You should date, it’s human to want to connect with someone and bond. Don’t be judgemental, if he’s a good person give him a chance. My only problem with females and high n counts is that they have so many options. They can open up some dating app, see they have 500 thirsty men. They’ll scroll through, see some douche with a six pack and ‘status’ and think he’s a better deal. Relationships take work, there’s ups and plenty o…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 12:54 PM
3

Man, every guy I’ve met has been on numerous hooker crusades. Even in foreign 3rd world countries, and these guys would be considered high quality men (big salaries, status, looks). God help those poor incels being left behind by woman racking up n counts then shaming them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 04:35 AM
1

I think so, x3 was back before the metric wasn’t scaled properly with tinder easy-lay options for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 04:32 AM
3

Well then rule out a huge chunk of the male population. And that’s a fact. So let’s dive into your logic here. A woman tends to have far, far greater n counts than men. The last girl I met who opened up about her high n count, then talked about every std she had contracted. And it was a disgustingly long list. Those were her choices, so it’s all about accountability. Every guy who sticks his dick in some random hookup, high chance it’ll be a girl like I mentioned above.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 04:25 AM
2

Interesting narrative, I think it failed to account for statistical studies based on men’s experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 11:58 PM
6

And that filtering, is where the story ends. Traditional values (using your youth to find a long term mate for reproduction). Instead, they’re just bouncing around short term relationships looking for the best deal, then they realise that Ex #3 was perfectly fine. He’s moved on and they’re left in cat and wine town posting man hate in feminist blogs.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 05:44 AM
1

What’s your definition of a decent guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 05:25 AM
4

You triple the count, and with men you divide by 3. That’s because men inflate their count (ego), and women attempt to lower their count (sexual value).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 05:25 AM
1

So 15, that’s a lot of guys. It looks like a few bad eggs have spoiled you and you’ve now got a warped and violent perception of men. The worst, is that you’re spreading this message like most feminists, then complaining that there’s no decent men left. Enjoy your cats?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 04:29 AM
2

It depends on the context but sure I’ll have a look. I’d wager they’re fishing way out of their smv which can’t be identified via reddit without pictures for reference. No normal guy is going to reject a woman unless she’s not keeping to her lane
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 04:26 AM
3

That you’ve probably cycled through a ton of men and formulated a shitty narrative based on your mating selection. Feminism has basically shamed and emasculated men to the point of obscurity. It is hardwired into men that women are the reward, and we worship them and sacrifice ourselves for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 04:02 AM
9

Based on the rise of the amount of guys who aren’t experiencing this, I’d say women are all crushing and falling in/out of love with the same typical guys. It’s then all of a sudden they reach 30, hit the wall and all of a sudden start expecting quality men to appear. You’ll be in for a surprise.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 03:53 AM
3

That’s because women only want messages from a Chad or Tyrone, and even then they expect men to put in all the effort in holding the conversation. God, I could only imagine being a woman and having all these thirsty men validate my existence. For women, it’s fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 03:44 AM
7

This is what happens when you chase only chads, learn from your mistakes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 02:09 AM
1

Men are biologically hard wired to spread there seed, we can’t just turn this off. If you’re only argument is saying ‘if men can do it, so can we’. Women are hardwired to seek out the best viable mate for reproduction. The issue is that women have so many options, then continue to complain that ‘it’s all junk food, I want a high quality man’ Maybe, you’re not a high quality women?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 11:42 PM
3

Pff if anything I’m too giving, and even in casual settings I make sure their satisfied. Never got anywhere with tinder, every girl on their had narcissism overload, wouldn’t respond to messages, and had a long check list of requirements.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 11:12 PM
12

Then I dunno, learn to settle for a decent guy and have a long term relationship? No, how about chasing chads instead who are exactly the type to pump and dump you. Guys are fully aware that because the dating market is totally f’cked at the moment, most girls are sleeping around and then complaining they aren’t having their needs met. If you sleep around for your prime years going through dick after dick, you betcha it’ll have repercussions.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 11:09 PM
2

Men aren’t stupid, it’s why we sniff around your sexual past and dump your low quality ass. you could develop a long term connection and guide him in pleasuring you. Rather than finding some random chad/fuck boy who’s developed said skills from playing the field. And then, what makes you think he wants to keep you long term then? Women seem to have zero self awareness or logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/21 11:42 AM
2

Correct. Women are a bottle of emotions, that’s it. I think women are baffled to learn that we aren’t made of stone, We feel just like them. But we learn to control it, because it’s not wanted. It’s not ‘manly’. Women get endless support from their gal pals, men get nothing. It’s no wonder the suicide rate for men is so high, feminism doesn’t talk about that though, because patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/21 11:11 AM
1

I’m 5’4, if I had a nickel for every time I’ve heard ‘if only you were 2 inches taller’
/r/askTRP25/07/20 08:42 AM
15

No, she pushed him. The messages alone indicate he was extremely hesitant. He was in a bad stage like many young males go through, so she took advantage of it as a method to indirectly kill him and gain sympathy as a bereaved girlfriend. Literally, for fucking sympathy. She's cancer, pure cancer. And unfortunately she's not some anomaly, there are others like her out there that will demean you and make you feel cowardly to get what they want, they're manipulators. Sociopaths are actually really …
/r/PussyPass17/06/17 08:28 AM
51

But Bruh she possessed
/r/PussyPass27/05/17 01:16 AM
8

This is sad, like next level beta virgin sad. They've actually taken the time to individually ban users from a sub they don't actually visit. Holy shit this is tragic lmfao
/r/PussyPass23/05/17 02:13 AM
1

Occupation: stay at home mummy No, just no. I've known plenty of women who have worked and raised children. Not staying at home watching Oprah Winfrey and collecting benefits because "muh children are my job". In certain circumstances Alimony is justified, but it can certainly open up a lot of abuse. I've seen single mum's raise a child, work and educate themselves and end up on 120K annual incomes (source: my fathers girlfriend)
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/17 09:59 AM
1

Here's the sub you're looking for /r/feminism
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/17 04:47 AM
4

Nope, I see tinder profiles regularly with women stating in their profile that if you're short, don't bother talking to them. I've then had girls ask me straight up what my occupation is trying to probe my status. I don't even bother with dating sites anymore.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/17 04:44 AM
3

What a load of toxic rubbish, where's your data to backup that claim? Women are just as likely to get to the top of a company as men, but but there's so many different factors involved
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/17 02:53 AM
1

Drink bleach you fucking spergelord lol
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/17 08:27 AM
4

So you've already diagnosed? Excellent, it shall save me the time of slowly dissecting your comments to highlight the autism, fuckwit.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/17 07:01 AM
5

Bro, I think you may be legally retarded.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/02/17 06:02 AM
8

Awesome rebuttal, you sure told me!
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 10:58 AM
17

Actually, it's a demonstration behind the level of entitlement that has infested our society, thanks to modern feminism. Women are not oppressed, they have rights, and are actually respected more than most men. We don't get pussypasses, and have a statistically far higher suicide rate. All this sub does is grant exposure to yucky feminist entitlement
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 05:58 AM
3

It's pathetic, bye bye.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 05:49 AM
2

Don't worry, everybody gets banned from that toxic sub.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/17 12:06 PM
1

Not sure how well my eyes would function without eyelids, but my penis is perfectly fine.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 03:05 PM
1

And had you read the fucking context and not reacted like a fucking sperglord, you would have realised I specifically stated consent should be given. Instead, you and the others went on a fanatical crusade. Logic eh, who needs it in this day when every douche has access to a keyboard and the Internet.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 04:04 AM
0

What new methods are you implying? Considering you argued there was no medical justification for removing it, I think you're pretty fucking ignorant.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 03:59 AM
0

No, they don't.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 03:57 AM
1

Far as I've heard losing 20% sensitivity shouldn't be a dramatic concern. Defensive? Considering the overwhelming amount of biased criticism I've had thrown at me, I'd argue it proves otherwise.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 06:55 AM
1

Yeh, because the last time someone had sex they distinctly told me how good it felt on the flap of their dick skin.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 02:43 AM
0

Had the procedure been performed properly and not left you in debilitating pain, perhaps you'd have a less bias viewset. Comparing eyelids to a flap of skin on the tip of your penis, isn't exactly a comparable example.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 02:37 AM
1

Not at all, I remember exactly how it felt to not have a circumcised penis, so I'm in a great position to discuss both sides of the table. The majority of the people spouting hate are either uncircumcised, or were circumcised as an infant (thus, not knowing how it feels to have an uncircumcised penis)
/r/MensRights18/12/15 01:12 AM
0

It's a flap of skin, nothing was amputated you twot. The specific ailment causes the skin to not become elastic and stretch, which makes it impossible to retract the skin. The only option available was circumcision. Like I previously stated, there are legitimate reasons for having this procedure performed.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 01:07 AM
1

I dunno man, from everyone I know who's not circumcised they're pretty sensitive.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 11:07 AM
1

Mate, I painfully urinated for years before my circumcision, what's your point?
/r/MensRights17/12/15 11:05 AM
0

Source info? I'm genuinely curious. Might explain why I don't pre-cum after 10 minutes
/r/MensRights17/12/15 10:44 AM
0

Perhaps this is something you can discuss in one of your bi-weekly mgm survivor groups? Or, simply make some more throw away accounts with equally amusing names. Who would have known your life was in near peril from such a barbaric and inhuman procedure, unspeakable villainy! But in all seriousness, anyone with half an ounce of intelligence and basic reading comprehension skills should have succumb to the conclusion that I was not pro-circumcision, but pro-choice. But I'm not going to stand arou…
/r/MensRights17/12/15 09:26 AM
-1

What do you think you're missing out on? Is it because others who are uncircumcised have reinforced the notion that they're quality of life is somehow better than yours? I've had an uncircumcised dick, and honestly I don't see what the fuss is about. Only people who "appear" to give a shit are uncircumcised shitlords who denote us as a pity case, because we're a product of abuse and religious fanaticism.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 04:14 AM
0

I find this irrelevant. I'm not looking for retribution. It's relevant, because you raised the issue. In addition, you never stated if it was a licensed health care professional who performed the procedure (and that's an important factor, because they won't botch the procedure) makes it seem like you had given consent. The entire premise of my argument has been that consent should be a requirement, you haven't been listening. And yes, I gave consent. Anyway, trying to argue with lynch mobs using…
/r/MensRights17/12/15 04:07 AM
1

That's exactly what people are saying, else the discussion would have ended when I abruptly informed you that such a procedure should require consent. In addition, I argued that there were legitimate medical reasons for having circumcision performed in some scenarios, and gave you an example that directly relates to myself. What I've come to witness instead, is an extreme view set on the vilification and objection to such a procedure, going as far as having users titled "Mgm survivor" contact me…
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:11 AM
1

If it was performed by a licensed medical practitioner who has botched the surgery, that's negligence. Furthermore, you weren't consenting, so you have every right to be angry. That doesn't disprove my argument that circumcision can sometimes be warranted, and can be necessary. I underwent this procedure at a hospital and it was very much regarded as "surgery". What I'm seeing is a very black and white approach, and I'm starting to witness some truly negative and extremely ignorant behaviour abo…
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:02 AM
0

You haven't stated any facts, but forgive me if I'm not going to take someone with a username titled "mgm survivor" seriously. Don't worry, I've screen captured your comments and will illustrate it in a thread I'm composing.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 11:52 PM
1

I'm not going to take anyone with dupe accounts seriously, especially one titled "mgm-survivor".
/r/MensRights16/12/15 11:22 PM
0

Actually, the problem was that I didn't immediately join the MGM lynchmob. From what I've witnessed, you've managed to make those who have undergone the procedure feel sexually crippled, and more or less inferior. No, circumcision should not be performed if consent is not given. Yes, there are legitimate medical reasons for having the procedure performed. All I've come to witness is a perpetual bandwagon of biased, stagnant hate for anyone who would even suggest that the procedure has an ounce o…
/r/MensRights16/12/15 11:19 PM
0

mgm-survivor I'm going to assume with a user name like this, this is troll-bait material.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 10:59 PM
-1

I am also a sexually mutilated atheist I'm done, seriously. What an absolute appalling negative view-set to harbour against yourself. Whether you have come to believe this through others constantly reinforcing that you are inferior to other 'non-circumcised' children as you are the victim of abuse is one thing, but coming to this conclusion by yourself is something else entirely. Good luck, I hope you can gain some self-confidence back.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 10:55 PM
-1

also I keep hearing about these 'medical' benefits and yet I never see evidence being posted up of what those benefits are Foreskin not being able to fully retract is an example of a medical reason, because this is exactly why I underwent the procedure. I'll reiterate, unless consent is given the procedure should not be performed. It appears not a single person actually read the underlying context of my comment, and immediately jumped on the hatewagon campaign, which is the level of extreme igno…
/r/MensRights16/12/15 10:45 PM
-1

I was circumcised at the age of 10 for a medical reason. If anyone has the right to speak about this issue from a non-biased perspective, it's certainly not you. I'll let you wallow in your own ignorance.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 10:32 PM
1

Do I need to reiterate that I believe circumcision should require consent? Or was everyone to exited to jump on the hate wagon without reading any of the context
/r/MensRights16/12/15 10:25 PM
-6

Speaking as someone who is both circumcised and an atheist, I find your comment to be extremely ignorant, and you don't have a clue what you're talking about. There are legitimate reasons for having this procedure performed, on both a medical and personal level. Like I previously said, I don't condone this being performed on infants. Simply put if consent has not been given, it should not be performed. Regardless, being circumcised is not a big deal, unless you make it a big deal. Don't label us…
/r/MensRights16/12/15 12:41 PM
-2

Hence, why I included children should have a choice. I love my circumcised dick, and definitely wouldn't consider it "mutilated".
/r/MensRights16/12/15 12:27 PM
-6

It really annoys me when people regard circumcision as mutilation and turn it into a pity case. I do believe that children should have a choice, but even adults choose to have this procedure performed for various reasons.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 08:43 AM
1

Fantastic comment, and exactly on point. It seemed as much as I pushed away her notions of male superiority, the more she pushed back. It's tough, especially since I strongly disagree with her ideologies
/r/MensRights01/12/15 12:57 PM
1

If there's one typical trait that synonymous with main stream feminism, it's the reluctance to listen or consider an opposing opinion that differs from their own (not unlike some religious groups to date). I'll most certainly look into these details you mentioned, but as you know, it will most certainly fall on deaf ears :/ I'm a fairly open minded person so I'm willing to understand there are issues that plague both male and female genders, but evidently it appears that the feminist ideology is…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 12:52 PM
1

Interesting, thank you :)
/r/MensRights01/12/15 12:42 PM
1

"Clown shoes squeak in the distance"
/r/MensRights27/11/15 03:12 AM
1

there are 50 serial killers active in the US at any given time There's significantly more. But you need a body to suggest a murder has taken place.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 03:09 AM
2

Feminist propaganda will have you believe that men bully and ostracise women out of these male dominated professions, but the truth of the matter is, they're simply not interested. There's a reason the hair and makeup industry is comprised mostly of women, and why trades are comprised of men. I recently did an I.T course, and there was literally 1 female out of almost 100 students. Mainstream feminists hate this, because it reinforces the concept of ingrained genetic interests, that reform to th…
/r/MensRights27/11/15 02:43 AM
1

But you can freely modify your baby's penis and so his whole future sexuality The fuck is that supposed to mean? Honestly, I can't help but feel people within the MRA community compare circumcision to being physically disadvantaged, or akin to that of being castrated. I'm not a 3-legged dog who needs sympathy due to my "circumstances". For reference, I'm a male who has been circumcised, and very much enjoy it. However, I do agree that children should be able to consent to this lifestyle choice, …
/r/MensRights23/11/15 01:39 PM
1

I haven't forgotten anything, you're just too stupid to formulate an argument based on my original comment riddled in satire. Like I said, troll better kid.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 02:58 AM
1

Dismiss what argument? Seriously, you must be intellectually handicapped.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 02:41 AM
1

You're a really bad troll, try harder.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 02:31 AM
1

It was a comment regarded as satire, there was no need to distance myself from anything, besides your blatant stupidity and obvious autism. You were literally the only person to have not been able to analyse basic human language skills, that would have indicated that it was not a comment that condoned the act of murder, but rather that of ridicule for the perpetrator. Great job kid, you've made yourself look socially incompetent and border line retarded.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 10:34 AM
1

It was satire, genius. Congratulations, you've just reached an all new category of stupid. Also, I think you may be autistic bro.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 08:22 AM
6

I never said it was ok, your reading comprehension skills are lacking. In other words, you're an idiot.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 10:44 AM
3

"Hey, remember how I said I was raped, yeh sorry that never happened, I was pretty drunk that night" "Oh, shieet.."
/r/MensRights21/11/15 03:02 AM
7

You'd be surprised how often girls lie about rape incidents, primarily to invoke sympathy and create melodrama within a sub-group. My best friend was actually in a similar situation, as he was accused of raping a girl. Nobody believed her, but it does horrible things to your reputation, so the damage was done. IMO unless I actually had evidence to support a rape claim, I wouldn't be off murdering people on a whim and burying their body in the middle of the night.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 02:56 AM
1

"That always terrifies the clergy!"
/r/MensRights16/11/15 01:32 PM
1

What's male genital mutilation?
/r/MensRights16/11/15 11:43 AM
1

wears protruding black codpiece innocently http://i.imgur.com/fTfBKCL.jpg
/r/MensRights16/11/15 11:36 AM
2

She may be in a separate department, but I'm willing to bet some of the more senior journalism staff have connections, I imagine some phone calls are being made. In addition, this is reflecting some serious negative attention on the university and staff, I wouldn't be surprised if they both end up with terminated contracts, or coincidentally "lack of funding" for whatever bullshit research papers they intend to work on. That Melissa click chick? She's researching fucking 50 shades of grey reader…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 02:16 AM
3

But, what about her important research project about Lady Gaga fans? Surely someone involved in a project of this level of intellectual magnitude would keep her position?
/r/MensRights11/11/15 02:09 AM
-1

Testosterone in itself doesn't cause aggression, but it does naturally reinforce some behaviours that can lead to aggressive scenarios, social dominance is a perfect example. This is pretty common around alpha males, as they feel the need to try and establish who's in charge, which can lead to conflict as they effectively "challenge" each other for authority. You see a lot of this at nightclub venues, especially when they're trying to attract females by establishing physical dominance. Females a…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 02:03 AM
3

Higher statistics of aggressive behaviour from males from a purely gender perspective wouldn't surprise me, testosterones a bitch. But, trying to argue that all men are inherently aggressive and/or violent is just absurd.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:05 PM
37

Melissa Click, assistant professor. Current research projects involve 50 Shades of Grey readers, the impact of social media in fans’ relationship with Lady Gaga, masculinity and male fans Don't worry, I don't think anyone is going to be disappointed about missing out on these stimulating reads.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:42 PM
-1

Source was a white supremacist, who was also a paedophile. That doesn't make the quote any less true. Very powerful stuff.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:41 PM
1

Actually, this is a prime example of men being seen as disposable assets, why is it necessary to highlight that 138 women were killed? Is a women's life more valuable than a mans? Why the fuck would people just assume that the plane was comprised mostly of males? You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 03:33 AM
1

It's frightening that there are people who actually consider them public figures, but it's not as if feminists have a lot to work with. Most of their statements and accusations are easily refutable, but they sustain this crusade by countering with "If you don't agree, you're a misogynist and oppressing me!". They don't want equal-ism, they want a matriarchy. If you actually read through Anita Sarkeesians "thesis" for her masters, you'd be in hysterics. It's only 72 pages, and the last 20 pages a…
/r/MensRights27/09/15 09:13 AM
6

When guys get put on the sex offender list just for taking a piss in an alley way, you know the system has failed.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 02:02 AM
3

Anybody want to forward this to /r/feminism? I think it will last exactly 20 minutes before the mods nuke it.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 02:00 AM
4

This is actually a known issue that has become prevalent with all the false rape accusations and man-hating campaigns as of late. Luckily, I've become fairly adept at spotting neo-nazi feminists in the wild, and I try to keep my distance from them like they have the plague. The last thing you want to do is start avoiding women, as long as you're respectful and don't act like a pig, you have nothing to be worried about.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 05:59 AM
1

there should be better access to teaching the basics of housekeeping at schools You want kids to learn about the fundamentals of..housekeeping? I think this is an issue that should be tackled in the home, not at school. If my mother ever asked me to dust or vacuum and I attempted to argue against it based on gender, I would have been smacked into another dimension. It's the role of the father and mother to reinforce non-gender stereotype roles. If you want something clean, clean it. If you're hu…
/r/MensRights12/09/15 05:51 AM
3

It's surprisingly easy to get banned in /r/feminism, have a conflicting point of view. The moderators there filter any content that gets added, including comments, which is troubling because it enables a completely narrow and obscure point of view, and nobody can challenge it. I believe I was banned in less than 10 minutes for criticising an extremely sexist article, made by an obvious tumblr feminazi. Once I was banned, I actually messaged the mods asking for clarification on the exact reason, …
/r/MensRights02/09/15 05:12 AM
2

From a feminists obscure point of view, as long as it benefits them, it's a non-issue. Could you imagine the shit-storm that would ensue if their was advertisement requesting women to rent their uterus, y'know, to prove their worth. I'm so tired of seeing the double-standards, and having to see this toxic feminist bullshit infest everything. Seriously, it's cancer. Here's an example
/r/MensRights01/09/15 12:31 PM
14

Can confirm, I was banned within 10 minutes on /r/feminism for criticising one of their feminazi articles. It was literally just a "100 reasons why men are cancer" smear campaign. That place is undeniably toxic, and the moderators are equally as pathetic for filtering content that would allow for a second narrative or different perspective.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 12:15 PM
3

Guaranteed, they basically selectively choose what content they want broadcast on their sub, this includes comments. I was insta-banned within 30 minutes because I had some mild criticism about a thread that served absolutely no purpose but to bash on men, it was literally a "Here's 100 reasons why men suck" article made by some femi-nazi. That entire subreddit is just toxic.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 03:28 AM
-1

Is it OK to not want to date someone because you don't feel physically attracted to them? Just don't say that to a feminist, because apparently appearance is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 07:56 AM
3

Surely they wouldn't be so stupid to say that people might be victims of rape but not realise? They are.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 07:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter