TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kiwijane3 Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by kiwijane3 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

That was excessive. I could see slapping him or something, but slamming him into the ground like that was just uncalled for.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 09:21 AM
8

This is the problem I have with feminist approaches to men’s issues I have in a nutshell. Every problem men face is due to “toxic” masculinity; Society, especially women, never have any role to play. It hurts men, and, as a woman, I find it insulting.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 06:34 PM
2

Not easily. Proving that no valid reason exists for every possible form of gender discrimination would be incredibly tedious.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 03:48 AM
2

Because discrimination requires a valid reason, and there isn't a valid reason for the majority of forms of gender discrimination.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 03:37 AM
2

Yes, that's what I've been saying.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 03:31 AM
2

Did you read my comment? In that particular instance, discrimination is justified by business factors.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 03:28 AM
3

Well, yes, I don't think biological factors are inherently illegitimate grounds for discrimination, but I don't know why you're arguing on this issue, because I never made any contrary claim. Some biological factors being valid grounds for discrimination doesn't imply that all biological factors are; What matters is the nature of the factor.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 03:23 AM
5

What do we mean by children? If we mean prepubescent children, that's not true; They can act like adults in extreme situations, but this isn't ideal. If you're talking about teenagers, then they are basically competent, and the amount of education necessary to function in their society is the important factor; This is lower in more primitive societies, like impoverished African ones. I've only admitted that people with reduced capacity to make decisions should be treated differently, and this is…
/r/MensRights26/06/18 03:00 AM
5

Because children have reduced mental capacity and are unable to care for themselves.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 02:47 AM
1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 09:44 PM
2

It seems like they’re discussing smart appliances where the abusive partner has the accounts. Some people might not know which appliances have those features, so counsellors should be aware, but most people should be able to sort it out on their own.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 09:01 AM
1

But she doesn’t have responsibility. She can choose to give the child up for adoption, at which point she is no longer responsible.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 08:51 AM
1

It depends on the department. This is from their entertainment department, and their output is insensitive trash. They also have a journalistic department, which I hear is better, though probably still highly biased.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 04:50 AM
3

This does sounds like it happens, but I feel like this article infantilizes the victims in these situations. The solution to this isn’t emergency shelters, support workers and court orders; It’s to turn off the devices while you look up how to reconfigure them. That’s not going to stop abuse, but it is going to give these people their privacy back.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 01:56 AM
3

If you look at the NISVS, you'll find that there are more male victims of rape (They don't call it that, but it is) each year than there are female victims of rape.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 05:26 AM
38

A lot of women have fantasies of violent rape, but nobody says that means we shouldn’t punish rapists. Why would we have a different standard for child molestation?
/r/MensRights19/06/18 11:22 PM
7

Why don’t we do both!
/r/MensRights19/06/18 08:18 AM
1

Trans people didn't suddenly start existing because we invented plastics, we've always existed and this has been documented throughout history; Maybe we're more common now because of environmental toxins, but that doesn't mean we don't exist. Nobody thinks those things are genders.. Being genderqueer is not a gender, it's a term for someone of any gender whose behaviours are atypical for their gender. Having a compulsion to masturbate while crossdressing is obviously not a gender. Only awkward t…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 08:57 AM
1

I think it’s worth remembering that these traits have a lot of overlap, so it isn’t just a male-female issue. On the whole, more women get burnt out, but there are a lot of women who don’t easily burn out, and a lot of men who do easily burn out. It’s more about allowing employees to choose employment options that make sense for them than it is about gender, and those options are obviously going to have consequences.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 08:23 AM
2

This is actually really misogynistic when you think about, because they’re essentially saying that women can’t prioritise working over family life; We have to be homemakers and mothers, and if that’s getting in the way of our career goals, then the solution is to be given special treatment, as if our husbands are incapable of taking care of those things because they’re men. It’s insulting to both genders.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 08:04 AM
1

The usefulness of a medical treatment is based on individual risk, not how common someone’s demographic is. Also, way more than 0.01% of people are trans; Current estimates suggest around 1%.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 05:51 PM
-1

That's a non-sequitur, but there are three; Male, female, and androgynous. The final one of those isn't controversial; We have records of many cultures throughout history that recognise an androgynous gender, in both mythical beings and actual people.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 06:51 AM
-1

It really isn't, and even if it was, I think trans people being able to live as their true selves is worth things being more complicated.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 06:42 AM
3

That's not true, and it seems you're confused about language.. In this context, cis means non-trans, so cis boys are boys who were born with penises, as opposed to trans boys, who were born with vaginas; A boy of either group can be of any sexual orientation. The vast majority of boys, including gay boys, are cis, while only a relatively small minority are gay, so the number of cis boys is far higher than the number of gay boys.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 02:25 AM
6

Ideally, yes. You can't easily tell which 12 year old boys are gay, and even for straight boys, the risk of penile or throat cancer is still significant, making HPV vaccination a sensible preventive measure. My point was that in a situation where only a subset of the population can be immunised, trans girls should receive the vaccination over cis boys, because they are at higher risk, not that only immunising a subset when you could easily immunise everybody is justifiable.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 01:43 AM
5

Giving trans girls priority over cis boys actually makes sense from a medical perspective; Trans girls are highly likely to have receptive anal sex, which puts them at a risk of hpv-induced rectal cancer comparable to the risk of cervical cancer is cis girls. This is still discrimination against boys, of course; Gay boys are at similar risk of anal cancer to trans girls, and should therefore have as much priority as girls, and even through straight boys have reduced risk, they should still recei…
/r/MensRights02/06/18 11:54 PM
10

As a trans woman, this pisses me off so much. I've been through so much shit, and these people are treating me like I'm some caricature of womanhood because they hate me for being born male and want to preserve their sex-based privileges. It's the intersection of transphobia, gynocentrism, and misandry, and it's the worst thing in the world.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 07:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter