| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | A&E doctor, 34, 'blackmailed landlord by falsely claiming he abused his daughter in bid to get deposit back'Ironic. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 10/07/18 02:30 PM |
| 25 | Fat woman pushes a guy out of a turnstile, then he gets some payback...If you reach a certain level of obesity, wouldn't the fat break your fall? | /r/PussyPassDenied | 02/04/18 07:52 PM |
| 3 | You get nothing...buh bye...Why? My math is correct. π1(keep,keep)=125000>0=π1(share,keep); π2(keep,keep)=125000>0=π2(keep,share); Nash Equilibrium = (keep,keep). Unless you can disprove Nash I stand by my original post. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 07/02/18 12:58 PM |
| 5 | You get nothing...buh bye...But it's not purely random. It's simple game theory in economics. Essentially, π1(keep,keep)=125000>0=π1(share,keep) π2(keep,keep)=125000>0=π2(keep,share) Thus the most optimal choice is (keep,keep) | /r/PussyPassDenied | 07/02/18 12:56 PM |
| 26 | You get nothing...buh bye...Guys, always remember, the Nash equilibrium is to keep. Always. The worst case scenario for both keep and share is the same ($0), but the best case scenario for keep is significantly better (a difference of 1/8 million). A variation on a simple prisoner's dillemma. ez | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/02/18 07:38 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter