TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kkokk Archive

View 1 posts and 45 comments by kkokk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Global Issueskkokk/r/MensRights15/04/19 04:50 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The best result is when everybody sacrifices. However, if other people AREN'T sacrificing, then it is in your best interest to not sacrifice. Playing by the rules when nobody else does is detrimental to yourself. Love is the same way. Love works far better and is more sustainable when both partners are totally open and vulnerable to each other, BUT ONLY if both parties reciprocate. If one party takes advantage of the other, then it is better for both parties to be selfish and closed off. People …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/19 05:40 AM
1

It always disgusted me, watching how girls would change every facet of their personality every time they got a new boyfriend. That's because the girls you know are basic bitches. Which in all probability, means you're probably a BB yourself (or maybe not, who knows) and extra bonus questions for men who wouldn't mind helping the other team out: 1. Could you feel loved by a woman who didn't need you? 2. Do I seem like a cold hearted bitch? 3. When you are in love, do you feel that you NEED that w…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/19 05:37 AM
1

I can't seem to find a guy that actually wants to take the lead. Acting like the man repels men. You contradict yourself here.
/r/RedPillWomen27/09/19 05:11 AM
3

It's also largely compensation for insecurity. He likely doesn't enjoy his life, and wants to pretend to be in a time where he supposedly would have had more "power", and using a Native or other POC woman is a part of that. This is a pretty common thing among white guys who don't have a lot going for them, although it's certainly not limited to them.
/r/RedPillWomen18/04/19 08:15 PM
3

m sure many of you would just leave and get a more dominant/masculine man but the truth is that my RMV isnt very high, mostly due to a deformity/disability it could be that he's being overcompensatingly nice to you because of this?
/r/RedPillWomen03/04/19 08:50 PM
-3

Both are correct, I think men are going to need it more though. The reproductive energy differential means that female is by default more energetic than the male; but only in reproduction. This means that the male will eventually evolve to meet that differential, because a male that uses more energy will over time outcompete a male that uses less energy, when all is held constant. Thus males evolve to be stronger, bigger, status-seeking, etc. The female preference doesn't even matter (although i…
/r/RedPillWomen02/04/19 09:33 PM
5

I always thought tall women looked more feminine, really
/r/RedPillWomen06/02/19 10:57 PM
19

if everyone has a mercedes, then a mercedes is meaningless
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/18 11:36 PM
11

If he's actually happy with it and she is too, then I don't see an issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/18 11:52 AM
1

I think you are right, but you also have to ask yourself "why does this sub, which often promotes a toxic mindset, even exist in the first place?" There are many answers, but a big one is the junk-foodification of our social diet. We regard psychological addictions as "normal" as long as everyone else is doing them. Hormesis is a process where a bit of stress optimizes the organism. You need some fiber to be healthy. You need exercise to be happy. You need sunlight, urgency, work, etc to be at y…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/18 02:43 PM
2

What if I have a natural tendency to want to eat fat and sugar heavy foods I think some sexual preferences are of the same nature. It's somehow okay to shame fatty calorie-dense foods, but it's not okay to say that certain sexual preferences should be ignored. I think that a lot of our sexual preferences are rooted in very tumultuous unstable times, just like our food preferences. The preference for height in males signals that the man had access to food resources, and has better physical prowes…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/18 05:00 AM
0

Sure it's fundamental. The situation has also gotten progressively better over the course of 1.5 centuries. Obviously this progress wasn't completely continuous, and you'd get bursts of progress and regress, but the overall trend was progress. Like how we still have winters, but the overall trend is global warming. So either the US is in the middle of an acute bout of regress, OR this is the turning point for the nation, and it implodes with mass casualties, and either gets outright conquered by…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/18 05:07 AM
0

Laura Ingraham was complaining about how "both legal and illegal immigrants" have destroyed American culture. She didn't propose any solution for it. There's no solution for it because it's not a problem. Every generation complains about something. Back in the 1800s they were complaining that Black people could vote, and in the 2010s they're complaining that there are too many non-whites in general. Eventually people will get used to it and it will cease to be a problem as well. Or we can have m…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/18 04:57 AM
3

have you ever been to a third world country? I have. The gender roles were quite lax, even moreso than what I've seen in the west.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/18 03:57 AM
-1

This suggests one of two things, and help me if I'm forgetting / missing something: a.) most men are attracted to middle aged and older women more than extremely young women or, b.) tons of older women watch porn on pornhub and want to see men their own age; so many, in fact, that they overwhelm the preferences of men... Yup, you missed something. Many men cannot hope to get the attention of a very young girl, so they watch porn of the girls that are more realistically within their grasp. If you…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/18 09:14 PM
1

Nobody's mentioning the obvious--sex and romance are different things. Men have different drives for these two things. Just because I'm physically attracted to someone on a gut level, doesn't mean I'm emotionally attracted to them. And vice versa I guess. In fact, the hottest girls are the least "romantically arousing" and vice versa, at least IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/18 08:07 AM
2

yes, I think that isn't hypocritical.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/18 02:56 AM
1

Why wouldn't it be? It's not hypocritical to prefer X when you're the opposite of X. Men prefer women. Short girls prefer tall guys. Some ditzy blondes prefer nerdy introverted guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/18 02:28 AM
0

All straight people expect a partner of the sex opposite them. So yes, all straight people are hypocrites by your logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/18 01:22 AM
0

So then all straight people are hypocrites.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/18 01:15 AM
1

Quite ironic, as you're the one imposing stuff to manage natural instinct. Our natural instinct, as people, is to maximize reproductive success. Let's assume that women even have the natural instinct to be promiscuous (serial monogamy is arguably different from promiscuity but w/e). Let's assume there is variation such that some men are more controlling of their partners, and others less so. Over time, the controlling men are going to necessarily be more reproductively fit than the permissive me…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/18 12:11 AM
1

If we evolved to have a certain mentality towards sex under non-BC conditions, then it will take way longer than a century for that mentality to erode.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/18 12:01 AM
1

I'd rather date someone with a similar history as myself You can have a promiscuous past and still prefer to date/marry someone with a low partner count.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 11:59 PM
1

counterpoint: evolutionary change takes longer than 40 years
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 11:56 PM
3

This stupid analogy assumes that a man is a key and a woman is a lock. But they are? Better analogy is that man is a key, and woman is a locked house. If I gave you a key that could unlock any house, you'd be rich If I gave you a house that could be unlocked by any key, you'd be burglarized everyday. A man that impregnates 700 women has 700 children. A woman that has sex with 700 men has one child. And pays for it with the trust of any potential provisioners from her mate pool.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 11:54 PM
3

I think there's something to be said here for hypersensitization. I'd compare it to so called "white fragility", except with women. When a group never has to deal with a certain class of status insult, the sporadic occurrences of such insults drive a much larger reaction. Essentially hygiene hypothesis, but for sociopolitics. Note that I said "certain class", because there are insults that are very common for both women and whites. However, being undesirable is a very rare insult for women, whil…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 11:45 PM
2

I actually agree with a lot of this except Straight women have the least orgasms out of any group of people There are plenty of other factors which can explain this other than (or in addition to) male porn addiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/18 07:47 PM
1

collective actions don't work unless they're biologically innate
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/18 03:45 PM
3

Timid woman = bad genes, but also easier to monopolize Assertive woman = good genes, but harder to control so it's a trade off
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 08:14 PM
4

energy deficit female invests reproductive energy, male invests everything-else energy If a man is unconfident, AKA no energy to acquire resources, it's the analog of a woman looking physically masculine (no investment in reproductive energy)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 08:12 PM
3

women don't pursue wealthy men because they're stuck doing housework they do more housework because they pursue wealthy men
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 05:31 PM
8

when you get the causation completely reversed
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 07:28 AM
8

That's nice, sweetie
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 07:11 AM
13

Harder, for sure. Increasing inequality means decreasing male diversity. Look at what happened globally during the neolithic revolution--elites across the world reproduced while commoners didn't. Inequality means monopolizing resources, and women are, at the end of the day, a sexual resource.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 03:41 AM
5

This just in: men like girls who are more likely to have sex
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/18 07:07 AM
0

The fact that women don't enjoy sex as much as men does not in any way mean that it's a literal resource that you can quantify like money. Are you illiterate? I very specifically compared it to another resource that is not typically strictly limited the way money is--physical/mental work. Women can hypothetically have sex all day if they wanted to, and workers could similarly sacrifice all their leisure time to increase raw output, perhaps not to the same degree because work takes more energy th…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 08:29 AM
-1

You are of course, wrong, because the "egalitarian" view of sex is wrong. Sex is a resource, and women do not enjoy it, in and of itself, as much as men do. An analogy would be work. All people are capable of working, but some types of work (playing video games, hunting, sports) are more enjoyable than others (office jobs, washing dishes). Your boss enjoys the work contract more than you, similar to how a man typically enjoys the sex contract more than a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 07:55 AM
9

I don't buy the "it's cultural, we have a very eurocentric world view" cliché because current culture pedestalizes "diversity" If it's not cultural, then why is every other European girl I know into Korean boy bands? I guess their genes just suddenly woke up and remembered the bloodline of the Khan conquerors or something. Furthermore, you're simply wrong. Diversity is valued by leftists, but in a paternalistic "we have to look out for the minorities" way, which necessarily infantilizes them and…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 06:18 PM
3

It's shallow because he's butthurt about being on the receiving end of those rejections, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 06:00 PM
2

I mean, there's basically a multitrillion dollar media industry propping it up. It's pretty hard to argue it's biological when you've got confounding factors like that. Or in other words, check out any European girl's tumblr blog: kpop out the ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 05:58 PM
6

a lot of women who care about it are 5'6" or shorter, which is the least qualified demographic to be setting that sort of qualifier. using this logic you should be homosexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 05:55 PM
2

"eggs are expensive, sperm is cheap" It's not just that they're expensive, but that their resources drive evolutionary demand. Because eggs are energetically expensive, the individuals who seek eggs will reproduce more than those who don't. And thus evolution mandates that all males pursue females.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/18 08:12 AM
7

OP, imagine you go into a furniture store and see a chair that looks cool. If you spend the rest of your life in IKEA, are you still gonna be fixated on that one chair? Of course not, there are millions of chairs in an IKEA catalog. The woman is you, the world is her IKEA, and the men are furniture. Doesn't have to have a reason, she will just get distracted.
/r/askTRP13/11/18 10:52 PM
0

Because men and women have different desires. Men like sex a lot, and have very little access to it. Women like sex much less, and have infinite access to it. A man needs sexual contact of some sort in a relationship, or else they may as well be friends. To a man, receiving sex = love. Not so for a woman, since women are typically drowning in sexual offers. For a woman, tangible provisioning = love. Money, work, gifts/flowers, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/18 06:31 PM
1

r/asablackman
/r/RedPillWomen08/11/18 02:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter