TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kneo24 Archive

View 0 posts and 193 comments by kneo24 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I can agree with you broadly, that yes it does exist, but based on everything I've read, it seems to be incredibly isolated and nothing systemic. The one example you give, nursing, you couldn't be more wrong about. Men are paid more in nursing, despite there being a huge difference in ratio between the sexes; women out number men.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 09:17 AM
4

You're getting downvoted but are correct in a sense; but many jurisdictions view pets as property, not full on life forms like humans. Then again, we allow mutilation of infants with circumcision too.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 06:58 PM
–

https://imgur.com/jZkXOme Well, they certainly are pissed that it might be not be a legal thing to do in Iceland.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 12:51 AM
3

There are federal laws in place to protect against discrimination. This lawsuit is alleging said discrimination on many fronts. If you're getting that from the lawsuit, I suggest you go back and reread it and apply it to not only federal law, but also California's own laws.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:21 AM
3

Equal treatment is being treated as the company wishes. They want to maintain a benefit from being a majority. None of that is remotely true and I again have to ask where you're getting this idea from. Then again it probably doesn't matter as you're a brand new account, much like the other ones with downvotes here, pushing the exact same narrative.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 08:15 AM
3

It's someones shill account. Look at the account age. Now look at the comment karma. It's someone who spends all day sitting in r/politics, happening to get in early enough with comments to reap the karma.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 12:24 AM
9

Is this what men want now? To force companies to treat them special, or cry about it and sue? Where are you getting this from? Men aren't asking for special treatment, they're asking for equal treatment.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 12:22 AM
-5

His dick was her red pill.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 09:03 PM
3

I like how we're getting downvoted for not reeeeing over the fact that feminists are hypocrites. I think generally speaking people complaining of sexism and whatever else over actors being objectified for things they choose to be a part of is a bullshit position regardless of gender. This sub needs to learn that not every battle is one we should take up.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 08:01 PM
1

Part of how we value celebrities is based on their appearance. If they don't want to be objectified, they shouldn't take roles that objectify them.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 01:07 PM
14

There's a thing called common decency. It's the same reason it's weird to stare at whatever scantily-clad women ( or men if you're into that) in public or at the beach. That's not in line with the context of this discussion. This point is moot. We're supposed to restrict our basal animalistic desired because we're supposed to be above that kind of thing. Attractive actors/actresses shouldn't be treated like meat when they're asked to model or strip down for a photo shoot or something. You couldn…
/r/MensRights03/11/17 09:18 AM
1

I don't understand what's wrong with objectification. If you put int he effort to look that good, why do you expect people to not notice it and not appreciate the fact that you look that good? Sure, in that moment you're a piece of meat, but that's purely a biological response. We, as a species, fuck each other because we objectify each other, imagine how we look naked and the things we'd like to do. I don't feel bad for anyone for using their looks to get a head in life. I'm also not some jealo…
/r/MensRights03/11/17 08:32 AM
1

Part of being a leader is the ability to help others grow, and nothing should stop you from doing that just because they don't work directly under you. I'm not suggesting you take this guy under your wing, but a friendly chat with him will go a long way to helping him and fostering a positive work environment. It also makes you look good to those above you.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 01:08 PM
1

Once you get your leadership spot settled in, start coaching the other guy who is a push over. If you're in charge of the work he does as well, make it clear to him that she needs to learn her job and for him to not go out of his way to help her if she absolutely refuses to learn. Hold him accountable for it as well. He has his own work to do. Write the chick up as often as you can and with enough write ups, shit can her.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 11:45 PM
1

I stopped watching about half an hour in yesterday when it started. Laci annoys me. I can only stare at her cleavage and DSL's for so long. Anyone got some timestamps for the highlights I should watch?
/r/MensRights30/03/17 08:05 PM
2

Good to know the mods are teenage girls, because who else seeks to create such drama for attention?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 01:27 AM
2

Look, you really haven't said anything with any substance. Your whole shtick here is, "listen to me screech!", and you continue to do it. It's old and tired. Just in case anyone is wondering, here is how I know they're a sad, pathetic, SJW. Though their initial attempts at what I guess they assume is intelligent dialogue left me wanting as well.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 01:02 AM
2

I see you ran out of energy already. If you're going to make attempts at insults, and let's be honest yours were absolutely pathetic, you need to try much, much harder. Maybe you'll find the energy to screech louder. Really, it's all you have.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 12:44 AM
2

Oh no! I startled it! The incomprehensible screeching has started!
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 12:28 AM
1

That may be true, but they definitely have had a noticeable impact on the website over the past few years. It's also clear the owners of Reddit are SJW's. Twitter does the same shit too. They claim to be a place for free speech, but what they really promote are their own narratives, and that promotion of said narrative gets worse as time goes on.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 12:27 AM
1

I see an SJW has come out of the wild. Now, we must be cautious or might start screeching some incomprehensible bullshit at us.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 12:23 AM
2

That's a valid criticism of Voat. If and when it does become big enough, handling server load shouldn't be an issue. We can see how people enjoy Reddit enough to support it monetarily. I imagine the same thing would happen with Voat if it ever gains that type of popularity. Just going by Alexa rankings, Voat has definitely increased traffic in the past 9 months. Going from near 15k to just a little under 10k.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 12:21 AM
–

I haven't posted on Reddit in a couple months now. I can even say I really never used this sub. I, however, have been following Reddit's censorship and ongoing, tacit approval of harassing people they don't like. This sub may not get shut down, but if it wasn't clear to anyone before, it should be now. Reddit does not like anyone who isn't a part of their narrative. What I do encourage you all to do is head on over to Voat. Is there a lot of nasty stuff over there? Sure. But you know what? You h…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 02:33 AM
–

What the fuck is wrong with you guys in this comment section? Not only does this story have fuck all to do with Mens Rights, talking shit on a guy who thought he was doing the right thing by helping a person in need makes you an asshole. You guys can go fuck yourselves. Not everything is a god damn MRA issue, not every action a stranger is taking to help another one is white knighting.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 09:50 PM
6

Short answer is yes. Slightly longer answer is that I typically don't consume whatever retards have her peddling.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 09:39 PM
11

We call that ideology egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 09:37 PM
21

The real kicker is the author tried comparing this to victim blaming. This women was not psychologically abused, emotionally abused, or physically abused. She had no reason to fear for her safety or life. Taken that into consideration, she was, at all times, in charge of her own actions. There was no moments where she could freeze up. It's a false comparison. I wouldn't let something like that go on for three years, but that's because I don't tolerate harassment.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 12:00 PM
15

I don't disagree, but why would you let someone send you unsolicited dick pics for three years?
/r/MensRights19/11/16 11:58 AM
4

Stop spreading FUD. It's not helpful.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 11:33 AM
1

Twitter bans people all the time for anything, but especially if they're driving a narrative. Twitter is a shit box.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 11:31 AM
–

ITT: OP is a trolling tard.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 01:46 AM
1

Why should MRA's go to Twitter? If they go against the narrative they will eventually be silenced and banned.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 01:43 AM
12

Milo: Feminists like to say when they're on the defensive, "oh don't you believe in equal rights?" Cathy: Do you believe in equality? I'm not sure if I laughed too hard, or not hard enough at that.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 01:38 AM
–

As someone who is center left, I hate the left and what they've become. May they crash and burn, and hopefully, like a phoenix, rise from the ashes. Maybe, just maybe, something better will come out of it. Honestly, fuck the left.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 01:08 AM
4

I stopped playing Blizzard games about 6 to 8 months ago. They are no longer a good company in my eyes. Sure, they make products that appeal to a lot of people, so in a sense they make "good" products, but all they do is pander to the lowest common denominator and their games really suffer for it. Fuck Blizzard.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 09:32 PM
3

As of right now? I can't think of any. There's nothing to marginalize them with. They can vote, own property, hold high paying jobs, get an education, have credit, and drive. They have the opportunity to do anything that a man does.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 11:20 PM
1

And ethnically he's Jewish.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 09:02 PM
3

And how do any of those show that he's racist? They are shitpost tier headlines. Oh no, he's a terrible person because he can troll.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 11:02 PM
–

Apparently he's a racist because his ex-wife claimed he didn't like Jews. Too bad Milo is probably the most famous personality Breitbart has and Milo is a Jew! Everything else I can find about his apparent racism is that he embraces western nationalism (but everyone wants to call it white etho-nationalism), he's an avid Trump supporter, and he considers himself to be a part of the alt-right (which people keep trying to pin racism on but again, it embraces western values, not white nationalism). …
/r/MensRights14/11/16 10:18 PM
4

I'm not entirely sure it's a small portion of feminists though. This is the type of stuff third wave feminism teaches people, and many of them gobble it up. Just the other day a guy came in here asking for advice on what to do with his wife and daughter who belittled him for not buying into the feminist dogma.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 02:11 PM
2

Trump is going to get push back regardless of what he does on any given issue. Considering that this will likely be the case, it would then make no sense for him to do nothing.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 05:46 PM
10

I'm sorry that you're going through this. I know I'm late to this conversation but here's my two cents anyway. I've read your responses here to get better context to everything. Tell your daughter to find a major that she can get marketable skills with, or fund her own college education. If she's willing to disrespect you as a human being, much less her own father in that fashion, she can pay for her school. Or she can drop the BS classes and get a skill so she can be a productive member of soci…
/r/MensRights13/11/16 04:55 AM
3

I'll say that women are more likely to be victims of crime and victims of domestic violence. So... we can talk about unfair sentencing but we also have to talk about the victims. Looking at the domestic violence statistic that google initially gives, the difference is only 8% different. 1 in 3 for women vs 1 in 4 for men, or 33% vs 25%. I wouldn't consider that a huge difference. As for unfair sentencing is concerned, the whole system needs an overhaul. It should not be gender based at all, as g…
/r/MensRights08/11/16 10:43 PM
5

First let's talk about the sentencing system for crimes. Men, on average, serve more time for the same crime as women because men are seen as "more violent" despite there being no evidence that men are actually more violent. Sure, Men statistically speaking are stronger than women due to biology, so our propensity to do more damage could theoretically be higher than a woman's, but modern technology pretty much makes that a moot point. As a male, if you're a victim of domestic violence, police la…
/r/MensRights08/11/16 09:41 PM
3

The problem is our share of the pie isn't even 50% in many aspects that it should be. Just from being here I've learned I have over looked many things just because it was the norm to not even think about it.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 09:14 PM
2

Remember, Hillary doesn't think that equal pay for equal work is a good thing.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 10:53 AM
5

the same way he fucked over all the subcontractors, the same way he approaches business. His claim is that they did poor work. Would you pay someone full price for shoddy work? I imagine he has stipulations laid out in his contract to this effect, and people just willingly sign it, because they see dollar signs when they think of Trump. Donald Trump is a disaster for Mens Rights. He's antagonistic, and represents all of the worst things people unfairly associate with men. He's a parody of himsel…
/r/MensRights08/11/16 10:47 AM
29

Welcome to politics, where everyone is an alleged rapist and people seeking fame and attention come out of the woodworks to cash in on it.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 11:30 PM
5

First and foremost, what you've gone through and are going through sucks and I honestly wish you all the best in getting through it. Unless you hit her and she was defending yourself (and that seems to be not the case here), what she did was wrong on both a legal level and a moral level. These actions are wrong regardless of what you did or didn't do. She is in the wrong. The sad part is domestic violence towards men in the western civilization is under reported and resources for it are sparse. …
/r/MensRights07/11/16 09:39 PM
2

And we've come full circle and you've shown you're not interested in actual discussion, but spitting and frothing from the mouth like a rabid animal. In your own words: If someone is sitting on the fence on simple things like not mutilating children, there really is not reasoning with them to begin with. You refuse to have a conversation or a discussion. But you keep doing you and using your hyperbole. It's clear that's all you care about doing. I guess the hivemind is a live and well within you…
/r/MensRights06/11/16 09:28 PM
4

Did anyone read this article that's linked by OP? I did. I think the absolutely horrid use of grammar gave me cancer.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 06:00 PM
1

The entirety of the attacks against Trump this election has rarely focused on the issues, but instead of unsubstantiated sexual assaults claims, and largely about racism that doesn't exist. It happens every four years where someone has to be a rapist or a racist. I honestly have learned to ignore all of this stuff. No one can prove it and it's just a distraction so no one looks at the issues they represent. I think it was worse this election cycle since it's clear the mainstream media has been c…
/r/MensRights06/11/16 05:55 PM
–

I've never understood the penchant for wanting to touch some strange child. You have no idea what if the parent has bathed them or anything. They could have ketchup matted hair from the lunch they just had as another example. Kids love putting food in their hair by accident. I personally don't want that stuff on me.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 05:50 PM
1

I'm going to point this out since no one has here specifically. Milo often uses comedy to make his inroads. I'm going to paraphrase Milo's thoughts on the use of comedy here, but essentially he feels that once the laughter dies, all of the bad things when it comes to our rights have taken root. Comedy is also a good tool at disarming people to get them to reconsider their opinion on a topic. Milo uses comedy to great effect in his speeches. If anyone actually takes his "feminism is cancer" as a …
/r/MensRights06/11/16 05:47 PM
–

But this is not about emotions this is about human rights. And when people like you are so callous about human rights violations, I hope it's understanding that this makes people emotional. My point was that you were using an illogical appeal to emotions to either make your points, or color them in with hyperbole to gain support. I was merely critiquing the way you went about expressing your idea. This does not mean it is for or against human rights violations. Secondly, you have no basis, yet a…
/r/MensRights06/11/16 05:41 PM
–

Pointing out that someone has the audacity to contradict widely held notions does not mean you hold the contradictions to be true. You are just merely a bystander at that point saying, "hey, this person doesn't agree". Calling male circumcision can be construed as mutilation, or it can be construed as a medical procedure. It's about context here. You're purposely using the word mutilation to invoke and emotional response. I'm not going to get into FGM because that procedure is entirely for ensur…
/r/MensRights06/11/16 12:48 PM
–

If you want people's dicks cut, you have to do it to them when they are children and cannot object. For people like you and Milo it's not about your own dicks, it's about the dicks of other people, and that is wrong, no matter how much mental gymnastics you do around it. Speaking of mental gymnastics, nice strawman argument you set up there? You're assuming that they're for circumcision without them actually stating it here. Maybe you've interacted with them before and they're for circumcision, …
/r/MensRights06/11/16 05:36 AM
3

I don't disagree with any of your points. I will, however, submit that we all need to be careful to not go full blown MGTOW or Redpill either. Many of their proponents advocate for generalized misogyny. If we find generalized misandry to be bad here, we need to treat that the same way. Women aren't evil, and I think we understand that, but sometimes, sometimes some people here forget that. I would consider that a bit of a cultural faux pas. Assholes exist everywhere, and I think largely we just …
/r/MensRights05/11/16 04:29 PM
3

Well, you're not wrong in a broader sense, but to answer to the question that was posed, he's correct. Society, in general, considers it a faux pas to question feminism.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 04:20 PM
2

I was honestly surprised to see that on 2X as well due to the circle jerk men are terrible at all times for any reason what so ever culture that permeates there. Also, MRA's are wholly terrible people to them too. I don't necessarily base this on the amount of anti men comments, but on the upvotes that those comments get.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 09:50 AM
2

OMG, how do you go through life not being a victim? You need to make stuff up, right?
/r/MensRights04/11/16 09:46 AM
–

I think you just sexually harassed Hugh Mungus.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 12:30 AM
1

You are the fucking stupid one here, as has been pointed out numerous times. It's also funny how you keep changing your story over time. You're an inconsistent fuck wad. If you don't feel this isn't worth your time on an MRA sub, that's fine. All of the other bullshit you've been slinging has been proven demonstrably false. If you don't want to be "targetted", don't make yourself a god damn target, moron. Peterson's actions, and a good many of us here in this MRA sub, denounce the very victim cu…
/r/MensRights04/11/16 12:15 AM
3

Thanks for showing what a fucking clueless retard you really are. If this battle, "didn't exist" as you say, SJW's wouldn't be harping about it. There wouldn't be a bill in Canada about it. You can get fined in New York for this. Ignoring this won't just magically make it go away, and as history has shown time after time, people will abuse these things, and courts will side with the abusers because it's technically the "letter of the law". So fuck you and your ignorance. Do go fuck yourself, as …
/r/MensRights03/11/16 09:07 PM
–

So your solution is to put words in my mouth instead of having an actual discussion. Cool. Instead of telling you to go fuck yourself with your intellectually dishonest bullshit, which is what I should do, and am in a round about way because you deserve it judging by your post history in this topic, I will once again attempt conversation with you. He and She pronouns exist as ways to quickly identify people. Man or woman should probably be a little annoyed if they're unreasonably misidentified. …
/r/MensRights03/11/16 08:29 PM
5

C'mon now, your point clearly doesn't hold given the context of the entire discussion.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 08:09 PM
2

The majority of real trans people aren't going full retard like this. They want to be labeled as the opposite sex and even go through life style changes to suit that need. If any trans person wants to go through this nonsense, they're either a fake (transtrender), or really in the minority of an otherwise minority group.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 08:08 PM
1

So you suffer from DID. It would be interesting if someone with DID went full SJW.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 08:06 PM
1

It's funny. You insinuate that I'm somehow naive, even agree with my assessment, which counters your own original assessment. What exactly was your point?
/r/MensRights03/11/16 08:04 PM
4

You are in the minority of a minority group. Trans people suffer from gender dysphoria. Hence their biological sex and brain chemistry don't match up. They overwhelmingly want to be the opposite sex, not labeled as something else entirely. Nice try, try again.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:11 PM
1

That doesn't even make sense. What do you define as proper? What if the facility he's in has a maintenance crew that handles this stuff?
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:02 PM
4

Any successful club or bar will cater to women for two reasons. It attracts women, which means more customers. If they feel safe there, they will go there. It brings men into the bar, which means more customers. The men will go where the women are at. If they act like douches, they get ejected. Jon Taffer, who does the show "Bar Rescue" and is a consultant, talks about this all the time on his show.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 09:11 PM
3

The woman can hide their tits all they want. I find tits interesting whether or not they're revealed. On that note, I appreciate a pretty face more than tits.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 09:08 PM
–

Well, it appears he still had enough time to do a chat with Roaming Millenial today, despite needing to remove a door.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 09:06 PM
1

Yes, you clearly haven't been paying attention. Clinton wants to impose a no fly zone in Syria, mainly over areas that are friendly to Russia and the group they're backing. Doing so is an act of war as that would require them to shoot down Russian craft flying over those spots. There's also the grand rhetoric that's been thrown around this election about how Russia is trying to influence our election and how they're responsible for the leak of the Podesta emails despite there being no proof of t…
/r/MensRights29/10/16 12:19 PM
2

Well, CNN does stand for Clinton Narrative Network.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 12:14 PM
2

You're right, what they're proposing is equity, which is exactly what feminism wants. So let's give them the equity they desire!
/r/MensRights29/10/16 12:08 PM
1

I know you didn't ask me, but I'll chip in with my comment. People assume that military service will automatically be a combat role. That isn't necessarily the case. There are many support roles in the military and this is what we need to keep in mind. There are women, although few and far between, who would be able to endure the physicality of a combat role. Biologically speaking men are more equipped to deal with this. There's no way to actually close the combat death gap without lowering stan…
/r/MensRights29/10/16 12:07 PM
–

This post pretty well sums up a recent r/AskReddit post where women asked men what they didn't know about men. One of the things that kept coming up was the lack of emotional support men have, and how we have to be stoic at all times. When people say that the sexes just don't understand each other it is so very true. While there are differences with the sexes, they both still want the same things in the end. Any time I see a woman being militant against MRA's and the issues they want to address,…
/r/MensRights26/10/16 08:35 PM
2

Why would you assume that a sub about mens rights would have people who participate in it be largely feminists? What you're looking for is r/menslib. Over there they have your male feminists who love sucking up to feminists and hate free speech.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 09:20 AM
2

Independent media, sure. Mainstream media? Nope.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 11:39 PM
2

Gloria Allred, the same woman who went after Michael Jackson and Herman Cain with fake charges, is representing these women. That tells me all I need to know.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 01:43 PM
3

Give me a break. She made the conscious decision to break the rules. She could have at any point in time found someone her age that had their life together. While he may have had a hand in ruining her life, it's the choices that she made that led there. Ultimately she's responsible. On that note, stripping isn't a bad profession. There's definitely a shelf life there for it, but if you're in a good location you can make some bank. It's a good opportunity to make good money, work part time, and g…
/r/MensRights20/10/16 09:38 PM
3

If you're anti-tradition, that's fine. But that's no more rational or objective than people who are pro-tradition. It's definitely not discriminatory, as people enjoy tradition. No one is being harmed, there's no prejudice here either. It no longer implies any stereotypical traditional roles, as many couples pick and choose which parts of the "traditional" marriage they want via "a la cart". You could, you know, try. Or maybe you're not clear on what sexism means?
/r/MensRights19/10/16 10:46 PM
3

Alright, I'll take the troll bait. Explain how this is sexist - that there is prejudice or discrimination, or how this fosters stereotypes based on social roles.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 10:15 PM
2

Sure, it's possible, but not in this case. She was my ex fiance and she had full permission to do those things. I just warned that if I went to bed angry at her, she should be prepared for the hate fucking of her life when she wakes me up. I do this with every female I've had a relationship with. Being woken up with sex is awesome. Hell, even as my ex, if she broke into my house just to sex me up, I wouldn't complain. She was completely out of my league. She was crazy though, and I have a surpri…
/r/MensRights19/10/16 10:04 PM
–

You don't need to be conscious for your body to respond to stimuli. I was woken up with a blow job once. Well, actually, she was getting ready to straddle me and I happened to wake up into it. I felt the BJ but thought I was dreaming.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 09:54 PM
1

If you two want to get married, you need to decide which parts of the traditional courting that you do like, don't like, and even go further with that in the marriage planning. Then find a compromise. I hate it when people turn this into an MRA or feminist issue. Maybe she doesn't want a diamond ring. Maybe she wants something that comes from the heart, something that had actual thought put into it. Have a discussion with her, and compromise. If you can't do that here, your future marriage is al…
/r/MensRights19/10/16 08:24 AM
4

So what is your aim in trying to discredit their fluency?
/r/MensRights19/10/16 08:20 AM
0

They are getting knocked down one by one, but the problem is that the MSM isn't covering it. The Podesta emails released by Wikileaks shows clearly that MSM has been working with Hillary's campaign, and they have been doing so since the primaries, possibly even before that. Yet, people want to believe these allegations are true because Trump dares to say politically incorrect things.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 01:19 PM
2

It's hard to take this seriously. Not even a shred of anecdotal evidence being shown. What is this? Concern trolling?
/r/MensRights15/10/16 10:59 PM
–

I say both are full of shit. The feminists don't understand what they preach, and Michelle Obama is just playing politics.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 10:52 PM
2

Correct The Record, which is a super PAC for the Clinton Campaign. They've been shilling all over Reddit. /r/politics entire mod team is now composed of them. One of their mods just very recently is a new account and has full mod powers. Even if you're not into politics, it's interesting to see the dirty game they're playing. Just checking out that sub, you will see zero anti-hillary posts. They all get deleted rather quickly. Also, you had a down vote before I hoped in here.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 10:45 PM
2

I see CTR is alive and well in here. Forbid if we make parody of the stream of conveniently timed allegations against Trump.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 09:44 PM
1

lolololol ITT, some tard tries using the "no true scotsman" fallacy. You just done rekt yourself, son.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:06 AM
1

Still with that bullshit? You're blaming Trump for policies that our politicians have enabled. Good for those companies that wish to stay here. In some instances, those companies simply can't afford to leave the country. Try taking out your anger at the very politicians who never work for our benefit. The current system is broken and the only other major candidate is a fucking criminal who subverts democracy at every turn. So, fuck off with your bullshit you fucking shill. No one is buying it.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 11:57 PM
2

Oh god, keep showing your ignorance. Yes, let's blame Trump for what most other business have done - out source their labor elsewhere cheaper because the laws in this country have made it lucrative to do so. Again, fuck off with your bullshit. No one is buying it.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 11:46 PM
1

Yeah, you're absolutely right. Because he does business outside of the country, he never hires Americans when he has businesses inside of America. You can take your dumb bullshit elsewhere. No one is buying it.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 11:27 PM
1

Yeah, you're right, it is totally Trumps fault he had the ability to do all of these things. It has nothing to do with the policies enacted by our leaders that ultimately made these choices sound fiscal choices at all. If the political powers that be don't like American business people doing these things, then they shouldn't have policies that enable these things. It's dumb to begrudge the man for taking advantage of the very things that we would take advantage of if given the chance.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 10:15 PM
3

I think your statement says plenty about you. You'd rather support someone who willingly takes illegal actions to subvert democracy.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 04:00 PM
–

I think in this case it's easy to pick a choice if you were inclined to choose between the two. One of them has been subverting democracy for a while now. The other one just has questionable views and the establishment hates them.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 03:37 PM
2

This is an interesting view point to explore. It doesn't matter what side your on, everyone is always, "will someone think of the children victims?" I don't think it's insignificant to say that there are people who are absolutely not harmed by this at all. How many of us would have gladly slept with one of our teachers?
/r/MensRights13/10/16 02:23 PM
1

Let's be honest here. Politics polarizes our country between democrat and republican. These are the two major parties held by the majority of the voters. Based on that, there really is only two choices. People pretty much ignore Jill Stein and Gary Johnson, or any other third party candidate. Trump isn't good for our cause, sure. I agree. Hillary isn't good for anyone. I'd rather vote for the jerk who makes insensitive comments than the jerk who not only makes insensitive comments, but has shown…
/r/MensRights13/10/16 02:20 PM
4

Absolutely. I don't play into the games of allegations against Bill Clinton either, just to be clear on where I stand on this issue. This could have been a moment of taking the high road. Instead the media has decided to work with Clinton's campaign and throw out the most ridiculous things and ignore real issues. I don't know how anyone can support Hillary over Trump if they really feel those are the only two options. Hillary will absolutely destroy men and their rights in this country.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 02:12 PM
–

I'm going to soap box rant here and feel free to disagree with me all you want. I feel this particular instance points to a much larger issue. If you take notice every time something damning comes out from the wikileaks releases, something more incredulous comes out against Donald so that the majority of mainstream media can do a blackout on what is clear evidence of not only subversion of democracy, but downright criminal activity. And the real shitty part about this? It's going to get worse. T…
/r/MensRights13/10/16 02:06 PM
5

The people are in the comments section of the original article. Many of them claim he leaves them alone if they make it clear they aren't interested.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 03:51 PM
-3

It's interesting to see that some dipwad who'd rather not have real conversation is going through each of these articles and downvoting anyone, anyone, who isn't at all bothered by Trump's speech. If you don't agree with them, try to silence them! Come out of the woodworks, you fucking coward.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 02:22 AM
-1

She hardly seemed receptive? Did you watch the entire video? It's later shown she is actively engaging in friendly flirting and banter with Trump and Bush, not shying away from it, not keeping things strictly professional.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 02:19 AM
1

Well since you broke your reply into two separate posts, I'll just condense my reply here. Your stance on college education: Fair enough. The opportunity for equality in that regard I agree with and I just never really considered it. Your stance on everything else: Look, I don't care who we piss off. America is the greatest country on this planet. We're a country that was mostly built on ideas at its very core, not on divisions of borders and resource wars. This is the best system that we as a s…
/r/MensRights12/10/16 01:16 AM
–

Why should there be outrage? Nothing Trump said is implicitly means someone is going to be a lecherous sexual predator. The faux outrage over what he said is ridiculous, but what you're trying to do is equally as ridiculous.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 10:59 PM
–

This whole article is about women's education globally. You can't compare the west to the rest of the world and just assume those statistics will be useful. In third world countries where there's a real problem men will disproportionally have more education than women. They also suffer other issues, such as classism, but it depends on the region. I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing for women to be brought closer to parity in other areas of the world.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 10:57 PM
–

This is not a men's rights issue. It's a free speech issue.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 09:19 PM
3

I'd like to see Lauren and her crew go full ape shit on these assholes just once. The fact that they have so much restraint and composure is something to be truly marveled. These are hot button issues and ego's flare up, but you're never going to get any sane and rational person to agree with you just because you want to assault people. If I was the camera person, the moment someone smacked my camera away is the moment they get their teeth knocked into their throat. It is not okay for you to mak…
/r/MensRights11/10/16 09:18 PM
1

Seems like to me that's a choice a man would be willingly making. They're free to accept those terms, or not to accept those terms.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 09:12 PM
13

Fat girl tries to publicly shame a fat man for being at a McDonalds. Pot calling the kettle black.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 09:11 PM
–

Not that it matters, since the exact quote of it is everywhere, but I did. If they allow him to do it, it is implied consent. I wonder if you have anything of substance to discuss to any of the actual points I made.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 08:37 PM
-1

I don't disagree with the sentiment in regards to your rape comment, but in regards to marriage in this instance, the dude done fucked up. I would never marry a woman that I didn't see without makeup first because that's a priority for me. How does she look without makeup? Clearly this guy never really thought through what he wanted from a relationship.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:57 PM
–

And how is this a mens rights issue? It seems like this is a case of an idiot not properly checking out the merchandise before he bought it.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 06:19 AM
–

I get that there might issues that people find are more important than the MRM. They're free to believe whatever they want in regards to that. But holy shit when people like /u/omegaphallic do mental gymnastics to say how Hillary is great for MRM, I can only agree with you.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:51 AM
6

Uh, it says he signed it in law, as in actually signed the document. It's now a federal law. It now has to happen regardless of who is in charge. I doubt any Presidential nominee is going to say this is a bad thing. It's a win for everyone.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:24 AM
1

If she actually does offer free university education it will level the playing field between men and women. Hillary also supports paternity care. And how does this level the playing field? Seems to me that men are choosing to not go to college. And under estimate how much influence Trump will have, appoints, vetoes, Trump has stated that he will choose someone who upholds the constitution of the united states. Someone who respects the first and second ammendments as specific talking points. The …
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:05 AM
2

And the funny sad part about this? Had this Asian girl told this guy to leave her alone, he would have! Modern day feminism wants everyone to believe this tactic never works, but here we have witness reports that it works!
/r/MensRights10/10/16 09:29 PM
3

It's an interesting take that MRM would prefer Clinton over Trump, since Hillary would definitely make it worse for man since she's so insistent on pandering to modern day feminist issues, while Trump would at least be neutral to it. I personally support Trump. Everyone hates him - he's not going to have an easy time passing any legislation. This could be a net positive thing as it will have congress working together for once. Worst case scenario he gets nothing accomplished. The country isn't a…
/r/MensRights10/10/16 08:57 PM
5

Take note it's a brand new account too. They're just trolling.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 12:05 PM
2

This used to be an easy thing to discern when we take context into account. Nowadays? I wouldn't even risk it.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 11:53 AM
1

I've noticed this a lot too. At the end of the day I don't care about unsubstantiated claims made towards Trump or Clinton when it comes to these type of things. They're both powerful men and women are drawn to that. They throw themselves at them or at least try to get near them so they can have a taste of what they offer.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 11:50 AM
1

I made the following statement: Well, a lot of gold diggers hang around those type of men too. The question is if it's unwanted. How many of them don't want that type of attention? The number is probably smaller than you think. Which means that if they don't want to be touched in that way, it is sexual assault. The assumption somewhere in the line of thinking through out this topic that he's done it. We're also talking about hypotheticals here. I don't buy that he's actually done this to any ext…
/r/MensRights09/10/16 11:32 PM
–

I Don't need any numbers on a statistic that can't be calculated unless Trump keeps a little black book of all the pussies he's grabbed. What I can do is offer reasonable assumptions based on logic. Apparently to you, reasonable logical leaps are talking out of my ass, but whatever. Let's consider that it's a month away from the polls. If he's such a terrible person, why aren't all of these women now coming out to say that he sexually assaulted them? Where are the plethora of allegations of puss…
/r/MensRights09/10/16 10:57 PM
–

Well, a lot of gold diggers hang around those type of men too. The question is if it's unwanted. How many of them don't want that type of attention? The number is probably smaller than you think.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 10:32 PM
3

Social issues have become very political lately. They are intertwined together.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 05:39 PM
–

Is this the argument you really want to use for consent? Stepping outside of this situation for a moment, people misread signals quite often and go in for the kiss. Should we condemn them as sexual deviants? Inside of this situation, there's plenty of women who throw themselves at power and wealth, and would find the attention quite welcome. If Trump gets away with it often enough because he's rarely admonished for it, it would prove his stance correct.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 05:38 PM
3

What is this cheese religion and where can I sign up? I need to liberate all the cheese!
/r/MensRights09/10/16 03:45 PM
–

I don't care, generally speaking, that there's some moral outrage over this. There are people who do not engage in this type of banter, regardless of their gender. They're also probably the same type of people who very religious and don't consume media with these type of themes either. How they feel is fine and I'm not going to argue with them over that. What gets me is the hypocrites come out of the woodworks over this statement. It shows a ton of intellectual bankruptcy. If this offends, stop …
/r/MensRights09/10/16 03:38 PM
6

The White Knight is strong with someone in the article. Holy shit. As a human being, he should feel ashamed that he made such a ridiculous leap in logic.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 03:30 PM
2

This is just amusing. I'll just grab some popcorn.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 06:20 PM
5

I'm sure some of those accusations are false, but it seems like they have an issue with the staff not properly checking ID. Staff who are too lazy to check ID are usually too lazy to properly handle business inside the building as well. It's hard to take the side of the business here when they can't even do the basic stuff correctly.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 03:46 PM
1

I just wanted to pop in here and say I've noticed a lot of the same things around here. I get that there's going to be overlap between ideologies, but if they want to red pill all over the place, they could just visit the appropriate sub. Integrity is important, even if we're being looked down upon just because we like movement. One day that integrity does shine through, but it never will if we don't take efforts to enforce it ourselves.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 03:33 PM
3

It's easy to do as there is a lot of overlap. People go into "red pill" mode quite often here on this sub.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 03:28 PM
1

All the video shows is that she was intoxicated. How do we know how her mental faculties are when she's intoxicated like that? I can be pretty rational and aware when I'm drunk, even to the point of passing out. Furthermore, how is he supposed to know what her mental faculties are like when she's that drunk if he's just meeting her?
/r/MensRights08/10/16 11:54 AM
–

I think your reasoning behind the easier job is a bit disingenuous. Running a household takes a lot of work too. It is certainly less dangerous and sure in some cases easier, but "just existing" is not how it gets done. It does take actual effort.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 11:36 AM
2

Sororities don't party? Are you kidding? Do you believe that these women are that chaste and never do anything? Reality doesn't fit the narrative you're trying to spin here.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 09:45 AM
3

I was in a civil suit once. I can't say how much it cost as I didn't front the bill. When I switched jobs, a couple years ago, I did so knowing that my former employer would come after me, and I made sure I got it in writing that my new employer would cover all of my legal expenses. This is just all background contextual information. What I can speak of about the process was after the first day in court, all of the anxiety came rushing to me like a ton bricks when I went to bed that night. I cou…
/r/MensRights07/10/16 11:14 PM
3

Ok, so you're 19. This probably isn't going to be your "rest of your life" type of job. Hardly anyone does that anymore. So what can you do? If you really feel you bring a lot to the table and want to stay employed there, ask for that raise. Do be prepared to qualify why you deserve one. How do you positively affect the companies bottom line? You could also talk to a lawyer. For many a consultation is free. If you really wish to pursue this, do be prepared to shell out some money up front. If wh…
/r/MensRights07/10/16 10:17 PM
–

This is also happening at sororities as well. This is not a mens rights issue. It's an issue for everyone.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 10:09 PM
5

This is a more effective way of banning men. Because why not? It's funny how inclusive we want to be as a society, but we are so quick to use a heavy hand and make large swipes to shut down the thought processes of large groups.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 10:07 PM
1

Taking a moment to step outside of this specific issue, seeking legal counsel, even for a retainer or a letter, can be costly. I know this as i was in a similar situation once. The moment people started accusing me of shit i got a lawyer. Having him on retainer cost me about 1500. It's a good thing i did as they went to the police and once the police talked to my lawyer the case was seemingly dropped for the moment. Due to statute of limitations i still have the remaining amount with my lawyer i…
/r/MensRights05/10/16 04:05 PM
–

This is probably the best advice if you have the resources to do so.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 11:39 PM
1

Shoe0nHead did a similar video today as well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvZlnus_OIE
/r/MensRights04/10/16 11:33 PM
1

It happens here. The best you can do is call it out when you see it. It's what I do.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 11:30 PM
2

It's interesting to see how they view as all men being bad in all situations regardless of any circumstances or reasonableness. All you need is a few short sentences with no context about how so man wronged a woman and you see the crazies coming out of the woodwork demonizing the guy.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 11:30 PM
1

I dunno about you, but fights are scary. I'd rather leave that stuff to the people who seem to be more equipped to handle it. If that makes me a dick or a coward, so be it.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 11:20 PM
2

Seriously? Is that how we on /r/MensRights want to compose ourselves? Part of point of this is that body shaming is not ok. And look at what you did, you body shamed.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 04:19 PM
1

I would like to fact check this, as this is the first time I'm hearing about it. The only thing I can find in regards to any central park rape hoax is the incident 25 years ago. People claim he's racists for a lot of stupid things that aren't racist given the context, and I have yet to see a contemporary example of it. If true, this would be a first and start making all the things he did / said 20 plus years ago relevant. The worst thing I can say about Trump is that he clearly has fascist tende…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 10:01 AM
1

The fascist aspects of Trump are scary, no doubt. His stances are based off of fear and it's easy to understand where that fear comes from. Any cursory glance at anything relating to Islam in the news, or just what Muslim's believe when looking at polls show it's not a peaceful religion. Outright banning a group of people isn't going to work (and quite frankly I find the idea abhorrent). Neither is treating the ideas behind Islam and their followers with the special snowflake stick going to work…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 12:32 AM
1

Are his opinions from 25 years ago relevant today? People can change in 25 years.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 11:15 PM
4

I have actually ran into this a lot on here on Reddit. When I mention that people, everyone, should be aware of their surroundings - people tell me it's victim blaming. The fact is criminals look for easy targets. But again, I'm told this is victim blaming and people should be able to do whatever they wish. Apparently idealistic notions, to them, beat reality.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 11:34 PM
1

Generally speaking, women's self defense courses are actually quite common as standard martial arts is mostly dominated by men. I can only assume this is a university sponsored thing. So yeah, it should just offer a mixed gender self defense course. What they often teach to women here can also be easily applied by men. I do however find these programs to be a poor substitute to a real martial arts program. Martial arts schools usually hold free seminars like this to get women interested in signi…
/r/MensRights26/09/16 11:29 PM
–

It's called integrity. I'd rather use a service where I didn't have to go out of my way to make a political point.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 06:01 PM
-1

TIL.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 02:54 PM
–

I've never heard of, or seen, guys going around groping a random woman's vag. Boobs and butts, yes, but vag? Is this really a thing?
/r/MensRights23/09/16 10:18 PM
6

2x has at least one discussion going on about it.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 04:03 PM
8

I would have to agree. It seems people like using this sub as an outlet to complain about the shit women do.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 09:34 PM
9

Same here. If she didn't act like a spoiled indignant child, he wouldn't have reacted that way.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 08:42 PM
3

I think it's great that women are learning how to handle themselves if shit ever goes down. It would be more wise if a better self defense course was mandatory over boxing, but hey, knowing how to place yourself and how to look for a punch is fucking useful.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 08:39 PM
6

I don't think it would be wise to piggy back off of the BLM movement. That group has turned into a hate group. It's something that the MRA movement wants to be careful of.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 08:50 PM
2

And how is that a Mens Rights thing? Men cheat on women all the time. Women being cheaters doesn't diminish our rights anymore than men being cheaters diminishes womens rights.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 12:58 AM
1

And how does this pertain to Mens Rights?
/r/MensRights21/09/16 12:52 AM
1

I don't think biology class is an appropriate place to be teaching birth control. I agree to an extent. It's hard to tell if there's a sex ed class that's separate, or if the biology teacher is taking it upon himself to teach sex ed for whatever reason that may be. If there's no formal sex ed classes, biology classes would be a good place to teach it.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 08:47 PM
–

I don't think there's much I could add to this article. Campuses just need to get rid of these special things regarding gender. Men definitely don't need classes where they're told raping people are bad. It would also be really nice if there could be actual dialog between feminists and men so we can dispel all of this patriarchy nonsense and how privileged white men are. I would love to have all of this privilege that I supposedly have. Fucking sign me up, you know? I don't see it as an issue th…
/r/MensRights19/09/16 08:42 PM
-2

Well, looking through some things of hers, if she did file for divorce, it's pretty clear in the end the husband was at fault. Infidelity is kind of a big deal to a lot of people. They had problems and instead of fixing it, he decided that having a mistress and ignoring marital issues was the best course. I certainly wouldn't tolerate anyone cheating on me and I'd dump them in a heartbeat. If she had cheated on him, you'd be slinging even worse insults at her. She has taken a realistic view on t…
/r/MensRights19/09/16 03:37 AM
1

All it says is that they're getting divorced, not that she initiated it. Again, context of said divorce is not in the article.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 02:32 AM
–

Nowhere in the article does it state she's divorcing him. We have no context into the circumstances around it.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 01:37 AM
3

This guy fucks.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 12:05 AM
1

Your job is to be supportive when they need it. However, they could also be unwilling to admit that it's a problem due to stereotypes of masculinity. Dig up some statistics on this type of violence and explain to them that it's way more common than they think, and that if they ever want your support, they have it.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 12:02 AM
1

2X in general just hates men. The entire narrative there is men bad, women good, but only if they agree with us. Since it's a place for women's perspectives, apparently their perspective is exactly that. This sub isn't about that at all. This is for being caught up on issues of mens rights and discussing things related to it. We love women as long as they aren't third wave feminists trying to emasculate us at every opportunity that they get. I realize we discuss other things here. It just doesn'…
/r/MensRights19/09/16 12:00 AM
–

Not that this matters, but does it say in the article that she wanted the divorce and not him? Because I can't find that anywhere. I'm all for hopping on hate trains, but let's direct our annoyance and anger the right way. Even if she did dump him, do we know the facts surrounding it? There's a lot to assume here. Our narratives should rely on facts, not unsubstantiated hyperbole. I just think she's a bit dumb for not being better with her finances and realizing she doesn't need to live the life…
/r/MensRights18/09/16 11:48 PM
–

I sympathize with the fact that she's set on her alimony to afford the life of raising three children by staying at home, where the father is virtually not in their lives. She also admits she has a lot of nice things and can easily afford them due to the alimony, but also some of those nice things were from her marriage and were supplied to her. She complains she can't date downwards in the social ladder so she can continue her lifestyle... Well hello? I'm sure there's a ton of people on /r/pers…
/r/MensRights18/09/16 08:13 PM
1

Years? Does she have other channels besides this one? All I see on this channel is content going back a few months.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 07:58 PM
2

After watching a few videos, the lady narrator in these videos has a new subscription.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 06:49 PM
–

People do the shit talking because MRA's have a strong dislike towards third wave feminism. Society, for whatever reason, still views feminism as a force of good. Very few modern feminists speak out against the ills of what a lot of the radical portion of their movement does, so you have people butting heads all over the place.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 03:07 PM
2

I feel sad for people like this. They've probably gone through some terrible shit in their life, never sought help, and channel all of what they're feeling through anger.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 02:54 PM
4

I honestly would like to take feminism seriously. It's hard to take it seriously when all they do is blather on how men don't fit into their stereotyped gender role, while women are free to do what they want. If feminists want negative masculinity attacked and broken down, wouldn't the correct solution to be not condoning stereotypes in the first place? I think gender roles are shit and people in general should be free to do what makes them happy as long as they don't hurt anyone in the process.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 10:16 PM
2

I would have called her an asshole for taking the opportunity to try and turn the sub into something it's not. There's a time and place for everything. I wish people would understand this.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 10:10 PM
1

This is what makes this issue so damn difficult. I want people to have body autonomy, but in instances like these where I helped the person create something, I also want to have a say in the outcome of it. I was a part of the process, and when you do things like this, you know you're taking the risk that this could happen. Both people are taking that risk. If my inclusion was important enough at the conception of it, why is it no longer important when you (rhetorically speaking) decide that you …
/r/MensRights16/09/16 10:03 PM
1

The users of Reddit make no sense. I perfectly understood your position when I read this stuff when you originally posted everything.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 09:45 PM
1

I must say, well played on the devil's advocate thing. You certainly stuck pretty hard to the written word of the law approach while everyone else is concerned with the spirit of the law. I think you might have slipped up once or twice, perhaps on purpose as a subtle nod to what you're doing, but I'm fucking impressed that you held your ground here. Sometimes fighting the opposing idea is a great exercise in understanding why we feel the way we do. You have given me new insights, but unfortunate…
/r/MensRights16/09/16 09:43 PM
3

Your conclusion makes absolutely no sense in context to what /u/KrogerPornStar is saying. They're definitely all for no one being charged. We don't need to speak about equality here when it's clearly obvious that the spirit of the law isn't even being followed. Sometimes the issues are beyond gender issues and more to do with shitty humans being shitheads.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 09:42 PM
–

In the US it is considered assault.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 04:03 PM
3

It's a shame that in this day and age we can't take people for their word alone and that be enough. In this instance a DNA test is the only reasonable outcome so you don't walk into that situation blindly.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 12:05 AM
1

Certainly, her being the first female president in the US would be a historic point, as was Obama being the first black president in the US is a historic point. What's maddening is that early in her campaign it was her only talking point. Her gender has no basis on her ability to do her job and it's completely irrelevant.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 04:21 PM
7

Very eloquent. I wanted to say these things, but I would have written an incredibly long wall of text. You hit all of the necessary points succinctly.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 04:15 PM
1

Hey, way to address my point about your comment of civilized society. You just go ahead and keep blame shifting though.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 01:01 PM
–

If our society was so civilized as you point out, people wouldn't be assaulting other people by spitting on them. They would call out their ideas and discuss with them why they're wrong. They would have an actual conversation. All your doing is blame shifting the situation. If someone assaults me, I have every right to defend myself. How I defend myself depends on the situation.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 12:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter