TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

knowless Archive

View 3 posts and 1,262 comments by knowless on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,262 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Continue adding to the debate! /r/whereshouldimove
/r/MensRights18/12/15 03:53 AM
1

That took courage, thanks for doing that.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 07:37 PM
4

I don't personally care deeply about the circumsision debate, I'm focused on other things, but just because your experience makes you prone to believe that altering a boys genitals unnecessarily at birth isn't sadistic doesn't change that it is generally a procedure that causes more complications to a healthy child then were it not done.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 11:47 PM
2

Astro-turfing, media spin, etc.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 04:01 PM
1

Off topic but i wanted to float this idea again: I've pitched the idea of a open world social work sim before, I honestly think it could be a pretty cool game, like you're a deeply in debt single woman in her mid thirties working out of a dilapidated county building that used to be a train station or something, and the majority of the game narrative focuses on the futility of trying to allocate what little resources you have under your control to just barely keep the community from imploding. In…
/r/MensRights07/06/15 02:56 PM
1

Well, she is using anti-discrimination legislation to attack a former employer, but who knows right?
/r/MensRights07/06/15 12:34 AM
1

Actually it's about ethics in crowd sourced news aggregation.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 12:32 AM
1

wasn't that tried and sidelined because people in actual positions of legal authority got it cut down? can someone remind me of the url, im fairly certain that elam and avfm were associated with it. it detailed female spousal abuse and discriminate sentencing for equal crimes? did someone monetarily important get featured or something?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 12:52 AM
2

they get whatever they want in exchange for providing the adequate legislation, no questions asked!
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:54 AM
3

oh you!
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:16 AM
2

i'm pretty sure it's about physical contact, it doesn't even have to be "sexual" in nature.. victorian²; hide your ankles ladies!
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:13 AM
3

"man-up" /s
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:10 AM
3

we can pretend VAWA is gender neutral because they swapped a few words, but c'mon, no court under this financial regime will want that precedent on their hands, the military is largely man-up conservatives and domestically feminism is the law of the land, any male that spoke up would be crushed in that grinder, actual gender equality isn't even an achievable goal right now. at least it seems that way to me.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:05 AM
5

the point is to apply it selectively to destroy political opposition, so as long as you don't practice wrongthink you're in the clear, but remember, if you ever wrongthink in the future then it was most definitely rape.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:01 AM
1

Nah, let them do the placement.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 09:28 PM
1

Ide get a stack and anonymously donate them to campus women's centers.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 07:29 PM
2

Oh my god, please tell me "honk if you think all men are rapists" is a real bumper sticker that I can buy.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 04:57 PM
14

A woman not willing to take a paternity test isn't trustworthy enough to marry.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 06:02 PM
5

They were purple right? Or light blue maybe?
/r/MensRights11/05/15 04:17 PM
2

Destabalising entire cultures for generations was totally worth it though..
/r/MensRights11/05/15 04:14 PM
4

i am 100% in favor of an all female workforce.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 02:50 PM
2

See, judging by kids responses in this thread I would peg him as either trolling, or trolling, but either way your quote gives me some conviction that that shirt is a more solid school wide learning experience then they were prepared to offer.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 11:32 PM
2

Huh. Well okay then.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 06:35 PM
3

What's indirect discrimination?
/r/MensRights20/04/15 05:56 PM
7

Great summary, hits all the points made in the article.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 02:28 PM
2

They will show themselves to be what they despise,
/r/MensRights18/04/15 10:13 PM
2

But dat funding?
/r/MensRights15/04/15 01:30 AM
3

If they are concerned for the projects of alimony children then they can fund them personally.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 01:29 AM
4

Men that capitalize on their sex appeal end up broken and homeless. Society should provide for those truly innocent of manipulation regardless of bias.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 01:24 AM
1

For real, in the like 3+ or whatever years I've been reading this sub this is one of the most common posts, i was actually surprised there hadn't been one for a bit.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 03:35 PM
2

But it's totally working for them.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 03:52 PM
7

Seriously, what in the ever loving fuck?
/r/MensRights11/04/15 10:23 PM
3

The "proving masculinity" argument has to be some of the most insulting bullshit I've ever heard.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 10:15 PM
1

You could file for incorporation in some states for like a couple hundred bucks, probably less, Nevada is notoriously easy. I could do it tomorrow, and I am by no means wealthy.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 02:42 PM
8

I wonder if it's intentional or not?
/r/MensRights06/04/15 02:53 PM
4

That's right bitch, I'm holding the door open for you!! as if you were an elderly man, or a child, or fucking anyone really! Bwahahahaha...
/r/MensRights11/03/15 02:41 PM
1

Oh, I read it wrong, OKcupid is still terrible.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 07:17 PM
-1

Exactly, so call okcupid out for allowing its employees to use the site to harass and encourage others to, is not like it matters right?
/r/MensRights10/02/15 04:01 PM
3

Let them swing that banhammer, they can all just circlejerk away their days. Means nothing to me.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 02:26 AM
5

That's not what you initially wrote, goodbye.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 06:05 AM
2

OK, but do you stand by your initial statement still or what?
/r/MensRights02/02/15 02:54 AM
3

OK, but you stand by your initial statement still or what?
/r/MensRights02/02/15 02:51 AM
6

You sound very wealthy.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 01:00 AM
1

Well then move to Arkansas right?
/r/MensRights01/02/15 11:59 PM
1

It was gender neutral before, that wasn't good enough
/r/MensRights01/02/15 11:16 PM
3

Wait, you honestly think you can't live on 12k a year?
/r/MensRights01/02/15 11:02 PM
10

Well that's too bad, a good party just takes a little initiative to get rolling, maybe in the future they can really put their minds to it and give it a solid try.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:51 PM
21

Wait, why don't the sororities throw their own parties?
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:16 PM
5

Who fucking knows.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 03:33 PM
6

Not really
/r/MensRights29/01/15 03:17 PM
4

I assume he means they were both drunk and the male thought(or it was) consensual at the time, but the female had second thoughts after she sobered up.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 03:15 PM
1

So videotape everything and have consent forms with you? Signed by both parties and a witness? Or will that not be admissible?
/r/MensRights29/01/15 03:09 PM
1

Haha
/r/MensRights25/01/15 02:10 PM
1

Haha
/r/MensRights25/01/15 02:09 PM
1

An explicit lie of omission in their methodology? who would have thought?!?
/r/MensRights23/01/15 04:29 PM
1

They're in it for control, they give up once no one is praising them. Actually addressing men's issues should put them in their place quick, once they realize how pointlessly frivolous their arguments actually are. But who knows.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 04:07 PM
1

I still don't think Marcotte has ever worked a day in her life.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 04:04 PM
6

She's raising the monsters she's trying to "fight", always the same bullshit.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 05:39 PM
1

Good luck.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 05:37 PM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights20/01/15 07:35 PM
2

If this is actually real then please dear God form a campaign to eliminate, or at the very least regulate gossip mags at the same level as pornography. I am totally serious. Please.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 06:55 PM
13

Textbook spousal abuse.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 09:44 PM
-2

.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 08:43 PM
-2

Would you pay me to?
/r/MensRights16/01/15 08:36 PM
20

"Multiculturalism" like "anti-racism" just means against whites.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 08:32 PM
-3

Why?
/r/MensRights16/01/15 08:13 PM
-15

I'm sorry that you feel that way.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 05:12 PM
-14

Here's the thing, who cares? Give them what they want, actual education will no longer happen in acedimia, win/win.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 04:35 PM
4

Anything else would surprise me.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 04:29 PM
1

That is an amazing idea, especially if you can run with it without ever breaking character, it would be legendary.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 10:06 PM
1

I just can't wait until Marcotte finally devolves into her true form, she's getting closer by the day.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 09:25 PM
2

That's feminism for you, intellectually dishonest psychological assault.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 09:02 PM
1

Is this article consistently misusing "a prior" in place of "a priori"?
/r/MensRights31/12/14 12:40 AM
1

i concur trilby tipping intensifies
/r/MensRights08/12/14 06:50 AM
1

oh man, POF really needs some new public relations advisors.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 06:49 AM
2

lol, people respond to you.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 06:48 AM
2

best answer, online dating is the dive bar of the internet.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 06:46 AM
1

Meh, give me a woman with the patience to actually have a legitimate conversation with me without treating me like I'm retarded and maybe we can talk "feminism". This article said nothing. Bro-country is a step back in our evolution. As we regress to a time when people were less free to be themselves Uh, sorry to burst your bubble bro, but I am currently not free to "be myself" because who I am doesn't fit the dominant narrative, and you're doing nothing that will alter that, so, yeah..
/r/MensRights28/11/14 08:37 PM
4

I love that apparently hair and eye color aren't evidence of racial distinction, but skin color is.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 10:00 PM
-1

somesones looking for a fight! there are many sides to feminism tell me about that, can they be described as something besides "feminism"?
/r/MensRights14/11/14 07:09 AM
-1

feminism is just fundamentalist religious teachings dressed up as progressive social ideology. why are you so tied to your label?
/r/MensRights14/11/14 06:57 AM
2

Well if it does I'll be sure to ask for a raise for the first time in my life!
/r/MensRights07/11/14 09:38 PM
1

Tell that to every penniless fuck that ever tried to make a dollar.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 03:13 AM
2

oh, but remember, the only people that have to fill out the cards are those that have to take out loans to attend a university. so it's only the stupidest of the most privileged.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 03:50 AM
2

finally just watched the video. if this wasn't staged, and she didn't antagonize/pay.promote anyone/thing, and this is actually what she has to "put up with", then i want her to pay me for her to do my job for me. literally, the physical job that i do or don't work, i want her to pay me hourly based on a set percentage of her wealth and inheritable wealth, for me to supervise her performing the daily tasks i undertake to have a roof, heat, water and food.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 02:58 AM
3

"i'm sorry little lady, how bout you just step in side while we men handle this like adults."
/r/MensRights04/11/14 02:49 AM
1

totally not weird at all.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 02:34 AM
2

now she can fuck whoever she wants and if daddy finds out it wont matter.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 02:32 AM
5

just go apply to be a ceo, you're a shoe-in!
/r/MensRights04/11/14 02:02 AM
1

I'm sorry, i honestly don't care all that much about the whole thing, she just seems like a disingenuous hack, but yes, if i were to actively attempt to put forward a working agenda attempting to alter the feminist victim narrative in video games i would generally agree with you.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 08:47 PM
1

i like her now though after this, the interview made her look fucking useless.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 05:43 PM
3

omg, they gave her tens of thousands of dollars to do nothing but sit around and play video games, and she hasn't..
/r/MensRights01/11/14 05:35 PM
-2

Isn't this pretty clear grounds for an unlawful termination/defamation suit? Do LGBT groups care so little about their freedoms that they're going to let this slide?
/r/MensRights01/11/14 03:03 AM
1

"Mother Jones | Smart, Fearless Journalism"
/r/MensRights01/11/14 02:58 AM
0

You're welcome Anita.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 09:51 PM
1

Yup, all it will do is spur on hyper masculine attitudes, while at the same time giving women a blank check to claim rape. If there is a "rape culture" they're the ones creating it.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 08:00 PM
3

My point is in the language: "...a lack of confidence or wimpy manner, not consent-seeking itself, which can be sought in a confident, assertive, charismatic manner...", she's just mocking the dude, that's it.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 02:36 PM
3

I liked the story about the woman trying to bait him for a rape charge.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 02:31 PM
8

"Perhaps women supposedly put off by your attempts to seek consent were actually reacting to a lack of confidence or wimpy manner, not consent-seeking itself, which can be sought in a confident, assertive, charismatic manner." Also known as: "I'm not gonna outright call you a pathetic little bitch, but you're a pathetic little bitch."
/r/MensRights21/10/14 02:28 PM
2

Is this for real? Like actually? Wow, absolutely no faith left in american media or society. Anyone who honestly wonders why feminism is under attack is delusional, this is perverse.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 12:43 AM
1

The Republicans can call me a bitch all they want, doesn't change the truth.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 02:49 PM
2

I mean seriously, all of the registered concealed carry crowd would be known to the police already, in a searchable database most likely. If she's actually afraid of her speeches getting shot up by law abiding citizens then she is either delusional or in the wrong line of work. Anyone, anywhere, can walk into a venue with a firearm, a law isn't going to stop that, if she wanted metal detectors then fine, catch those carrying illegally, it's just so incredibly naive I can't even understand it.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 02:30 PM
1

I think it might be intentional.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 04:12 PM
1

Compile issues, draw stances, cite cases. Cotwa does it best right now, but that could be expanded in a simplified and accessible format across all issues. The entire site essentially a FAQ with a homepage.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 03:15 AM
2

Literally everything is rape.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 01:02 AM
1

Troll harder. I expected more from you.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 01:01 AM
2

Who cares, the government is printing free money for single moms, taxes aren't real, and there will never be consequences for fucking over huge groups of people ever, see the American slave trade for a good example of this in practice.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 01:00 AM
1

My dating pool is zero, even in major cities, so yeah, foregone conclusion.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 12:54 AM
0

"The speaker, Anita Sarkeesian, canceled the presentation. She was concerned about the fact that state law prevented the university from keeping people with a legal concealed firearm permit from entering the event." Political ploy, as always.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 09:32 PM
1

Facebook has admitted to running social engineering campaigns on users without their consent, so no, it's not just algorithms.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 02:33 PM
2

Helping women does not include harming men. In the eyes of the unaffiliated public they are sister organisations.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 01:29 AM
2

So the YWCA is free to vilify men? That seems illogical and against Christian theology and secular morality.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 01:21 AM
2

Why?
/r/MensRights15/10/14 01:18 AM
0

Are they not sister organisations, or is one a subsidiary? Either way both are representative of the larger organization and brand. Your splitting hairs exemplifies the very nature of the complaint.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 01:15 AM
1

They don't "believe themselves to be" they ensure it. Its a mind game chasing the highest net worth. "I'm a misogynist".
/r/MensRights15/10/14 12:40 AM
1

They're just raising strong stoic men, which are instrumental to our success as a society, someone needs to shoulder the burden.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 12:37 AM
6

It's a strength through numbers thing, it's cult like in its adherence to it's adherents views, self replicating circular logic based in a victim mentality when the reality is very much the opposite as to who holds social power.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 12:35 AM
2

What do they mean by "entitlement" because every time I see it used the implication is that men don't deserve any kind of compensation(or even the ability to negotiate costs) for labor. I'm not talking about transactional attitudes towards private social interactions, but broadly, as a whole.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 12:31 AM
2

Right, but if you don't give them the perception of an adequate angle of attack they might not try at all.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 02:32 PM
2

I have no idea, I just assume they're lying.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 02:30 PM
3

Right, life's a battle and you better be winning. No place for empathy when there's money to be made.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 04:50 PM
2

tåler Huh, i might just call for someone to talk to.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 03:00 AM
1

Research across all of human culture what the capability of retaining a beard means.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 02:36 AM
1

Well at least you don't need to teach her how to paint her face i guess.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 02:33 AM
1

Play the fucking gif. The next woman that complains about my chest hair needs to Togtfo.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 02:32 AM
10

Child sex trafficking shouldn't be ignored if a woman is the "prime suspect". Feminism.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 02:29 AM
3

Came here to say this.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 06:46 PM
12

If parental involvement at school is the only issue, and not sexism, then yeah. Is you're opinion disregarded because of "lack of experience", because you weren't given records or access in a timely manner? Why? These are state funded institutions, if they value their "contribution" to society then demand that they explain what exactly they were unable to teach your child, and why their method failed, "kindly" of course. Allow them to prove themselves to hold no bias thorough actual remedial act…
/r/MensRights01/10/14 02:03 AM
49

It's cool though, give mom a break, make the decisions for a change.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 01:52 AM
1

Yeah, it seems counter productive enough that the "unintended" consequences don't seem to be.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 01:11 AM
2

An affirmative consent standard, a woman no longer needs to refuse sexual advances for it to still be considered rape, a man just needs to not gain explicit consent moment to moment, it's insane.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 04:01 PM
1

It's really more semantic than anything, at least you didn't say epistemological.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 01:19 AM
1

So women can't be held responsible for violent crimes? Is that your point? Or should we just go back to taking out the closest male relative if a woman dares step out of her place?
/r/MensRights28/09/14 10:23 PM
9

That's it, I'm starting a male only sorority.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:38 PM
2

She's essentially just bitching that a movie star agreed with her, but phrased it as "how bout we all not be such cunts about this?". Instead of taking up the pitchfork and working towards "equality" by targeting white men in the west with rhetoric designed to destroy them (and men in general, but of course, mostly those of European descent, because fuck them the most obviously). Its the same line they always yell, class war forever, except being white makes you upper class even if you aren't, i…
/r/MensRights27/09/14 02:48 PM
0

They are hard line ideological leftists, all you have to do is say faggot or nigger and they're fine with you dieing, irrespective of anything else about your life, they don't care about anything but ideological purity, and will eventually kill for it.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 01:19 AM
1

When will people get that?
/r/MensRights16/09/14 01:03 AM
1

Of fucking course it's in Portland.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 01:00 AM
2

Post your own threads then, no one is stopping you, be proactive and direct focus on the issues that you think matter instead of bitching.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 12:39 AM
1

Kate fagan thinks the nfl should fund chivalry courses for highschool athletes?
/r/MensRights14/09/14 10:28 PM
0

It's a bullshit industry, if you're good you're good.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 05:03 AM
2

Oh sorry, i just generally assume women can't cook very well.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 03:48 AM
3

Where do you live that it's assumed that a woman knows how to cook?
/r/MensRights14/09/14 03:43 AM
1

To Sanford: You got taken down buddy, all you can do from here is fight to the death. You have no rights, your life is a show trial, and no one will have any remorse getting you closer to the grave. Good luck man.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 12:37 AM
5

That must be why the author harped on the "four-course meal" trope, because she's never worked in a kitchen.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 12:27 AM
1

;p
/r/MensRights14/09/14 12:19 AM
1

Awesome.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 04:59 PM
1

That's how dahmer got his start.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 01:20 AM
2

Do you understand the massive road block you're going to encounter by stating that women are biologically predisposed towards manipulative social behavior?
/r/MensRights11/09/14 01:03 AM
1

What about single men? Whose going to pay them?
/r/MensRights10/09/14 05:01 PM
2

He wasn't "contributing to the discussion".
/r/MensRights10/09/14 03:13 PM
-2

Respect earns respect.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 08:38 PM
1

...
/r/MensRights08/09/14 03:08 PM
2

...so did the feminist girl help the unconscious one?
/r/MensRights08/09/14 02:53 PM
2

How long would it take to find a guardian sanctioned article that did just that? I'm guessing not long.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 01:15 AM
1

I thought it was odd, didn't Roger Elliott initially fatally wound more with a knife? Odd right?
/r/MensRights05/09/14 04:33 AM
1

"Mass shooting" is a pretty loosely defined term, generally applied when it suits a particular political agenda. In places that ban civilian ownership of firearms they're usually stabbings or bombings, but to the same effect. I don't know what's up with the "unknown" category, i assume some one set a bot on death totals for specific types of crime reports, then as the media narrative shifted they moved on to other endeavors without clarifying parameters after a shift, or maybe just neglected nec…
/r/MensRights05/09/14 02:21 AM
1

"most recent mass shooting"
/r/MensRights05/09/14 01:08 AM
10

Fucking called it.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 04:53 PM
1

I want their citation from the SPLC.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 02:37 PM
1

The daily show crowd loved him, it was really a shame, he had a chance at the presidency.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 12:21 AM
5

"president" because George Washington was embarrassed being referred to as "king". haters gonna hate.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 12:14 AM
2

Does anyone else think this is hilarious? Because i do.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 05:54 PM
6

It's because they want to "catch" "rapists", the entire encounter can be 100% consensual, it's a tool for blackmail or explicit destruction through seduction. To whoever upthread was saying this will apply equally to men and women, lol, no it won't.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 04:57 PM
2

At what point does it become politically palatable to point out that they implicitly support systematic child rape if it is against the "correct group"?
/r/MensRights31/08/14 10:33 PM
1

Fought = picked
/r/MensRights31/08/14 02:10 AM
0

So then a woman should choose her partners more carefully as well, because if a man cheats it was because she didn't recognize the warning signs?
/r/MensRights31/08/14 12:37 AM
1

If this thread is to be believed it's already happened, and the woman succeeded. Would love a followup or verification on that of course.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 11:11 PM
2

If a woman cheats it's still the mans fault? Nice.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 10:46 PM
2

Hah hah hah...
/r/MensRights30/08/14 04:05 AM
-2

Momentum is a hell of a drug.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 03:25 AM
6

I wish i could agree, but oney is just 2x lite. /r/mensrights should not be a default in my opinion, as none of the gender specific subs should, but this is the same debate as lgbt vs. glbt, as in, human nature and pointless, because it will always be the same outcome, biologically as necessity all groups will put women first. Nice run-on right?
/r/MensRights30/08/14 03:22 AM
19

In you're screenshots the mod suggested you take the discussion elsewhere, where were they suggesting you go?
/r/MensRights29/08/14 12:34 AM
6

There is absolutely no way this could be abused.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 12:30 AM
7

Stay classy, cracked.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 11:48 PM
7

I think a good summary is that they condone leading men on then dropping them hard to prove that men feel "entitled to sex", because if they didn't then they would be fine with "just being friends", regardless that that type of emotional manipulation is a huge red flag(they of course spin this around by saying that being hurt by rejection, even when intentional emotional damage done to someone, is a red flag, the sociopathic nature of this line of reasoning should be obvious). All it actually do…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 05:59 PM
2

"domestic violence" legislation is the avenue they're taking to criminalize political dissent.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 05:27 PM
19

Equality means women having the ability to pick their slave/s to sacrifice to the state.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 02:46 AM
1

I love that I'm being downvoted for backing the notion that consent is an ongoing and evolving process, but that after the fact this is no longer the case, you people are fucking retarded. Have fun with the world you're building for your children, they will resent you for it. Stop! No just joking, keep going, okay bye. sirens
/r/MensRights20/08/14 02:27 AM
7

"It is impossible to extricate yourself from collective rights relating to gender, race, or sexuality. Unless you wish to withdraw from society, you will both benefit and suffer from political and social changes to what women can and cannot do..." Pure gold..
/r/MensRights19/08/14 11:01 PM
1

I agree! Abolish women's prisons!
/r/MensRights19/08/14 03:57 AM
3

Hella weird right?
/r/MensRights19/08/14 02:40 AM
3

They're called gold diggers as the kindest term, lady.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 02:31 AM
6

Reminds me of body worlds, when i went they arranged the display so that anyone looking at any of the female portraits(that's a nicer word than "corpses" right?) was made isolated and blatantly obvious to the rest of the people viewing the exhibit, whereas the cocks were full on in your face. All I'm saying was that it was a really shitty date.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 02:26 AM
166

"remember when i said, Done?" You literally raped her mind man, you're sick.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 07:09 PM
-5

Do you disagree with the statement you're responding to?
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:51 PM
6

You haven't been following the "rape culture" witch hunts on college campuses? Or the "affirmative consent" bill in California? Or the "campus safety" bills in congress?
/r/MensRights18/08/14 03:46 PM
-1

Even your phrasing is insulting, you can't "withdraw consent after the fact", call it what it is, a false rape allegation.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 03:44 PM
3

"patriarchy!" Sorry m'lady, but in fact, yes. tips keffiyeh handcuffs
/r/MensRights18/08/14 01:36 AM
1

My point was in showing the change that two years made on her perspective, from "cheating is liberating" to "why is casual sex not meaningful", it's a pretty solid reversal, and says more about the author than any political point she could try to make. Also, you're quote, although the summary paragraph, might as well have been cherry picked, as it has absolutely no relation to the rest of the article.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 08:30 PM
2

Look, they're hilariously ironic! Like middle-schoolers! These are the people we want in control, paving the way to the future!
/r/MensRights17/08/14 07:10 AM
1

That's victim blaming. You do realise that currently a bipartisan group of lawmakers in the federal congress is drafting legislation which explicitly states, in the wording of the law, that the accuser be referred to as "victim" without any test to the veracity of their claim? But yes, perjury is a felony.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 06:41 AM
2

Compare and contrast Seriously, read that article, then tell me this woman has anything meaningful to contribute to the discussion. "feminism" everybody.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 06:27 AM
0

No, I'm not sure why you're arguing with me, I'm just stating facts.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 01:48 AM
0

She can claim it was self defense, or retaliation for previous abuse, both valid under current law.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 12:48 AM
3

Right, he should leave her, but he shouldn't have to, she should be in jail.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 07:37 PM
9

Because she's a woman.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 07:31 PM
0

#yesallwomen
/r/MensRights16/08/14 07:02 PM
10

#yesallwomen
/r/MensRights16/08/14 06:57 PM
0

It's the patriarchy, but actual factual, for real, not some idiot spewing retardation, it's the top level elites(of both sexes) choosing women (and men they can render subservient) explicitly as the new middle(management)class, all the while muddling the debate with semantic bullshit about the definition of "gender", their husband is the state, and men are it's slaves. It is as anti "equality" as it gets. I look forward to "college" participation and graduation rates for women reaching 90%+.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 01:49 AM
6

It's honestly hilarious to me that the western world is seemingly intentionally driving itself into irrelevance by not giving men any option to succeed.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 01:37 AM
3

Please elaborate.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 04:42 PM
1

You read the article where a woman has gathered a following calling for genocide and you don't understand what I'm trying to say?
/r/MensRights15/08/14 02:31 PM
1

There's no point, the nature of political dialogue in the USA and western world makes my viewpoint irrelevant, by design of the framework set in place.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 02:28 PM
-1

I appreciate that you don't want to read the source material, that's commendable in it's irrelevance.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 05:37 AM
-1

Did you read the initial article? If so, do you represent the faction of womanhood who feels that a 9 to 1 ratio is something beyond fantasy? And in it's Utopian endeavor isn't akin to the genocides of the fascists and communists? Or am i commenting on the wrong article?
/r/MensRights15/08/14 04:47 AM
0

I'm a racist. Because i believe that regardless of my heritage i have a right to defend myself.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 04:33 AM
2

Please look into the fertility badges under Nazi leadership, also rwanda. Subsuming maternal urges is as prevalent as that of paternal, to deny the female element in atrocities is to deny that females have agency/culpability. This isn't gendered in the end, but the methods of reinforcing control derive from biological certainties.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 04:21 AM
1

This is the only way to eliminate predatory behaviors that target "legal" structures of enforced sexuality.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 01:49 AM
0

It isn't about men, it's a slow burn revolution to replace populations.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 01:33 AM
1

They want to hide their genocidal tendencies by framing it as part of the "gender debate", when it's quite clear from their rhetoric that their true goal is to enact ideological mass murder and slavery. Hiding behind a cutesy face doesn't deny or controvert your intentions. Lol, you trolled me right?
/r/MensRights15/08/14 01:32 AM
3

" Women are given free reign to label men as misogynist without limit. In other words they are given free reign to refer to men as woman hating, when the term applies.They are never ever accused of being inflammatory for that. I have expressed the widely held view among many men fighting for equal rights that this was "Another disgraceful and shameful case of a stitchup on an older white male by a misandrous criminal prosecution service"." How is that inflammatory? I'm not familiar with the case…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 01:21 AM
3

Man, I'm glad I'm still banned over there. Pure retardation (i reintroduced that word back into my daily vocabulary specifically because of people like them, i hope they're proud of me!).
/r/MensRights15/08/14 01:03 AM
5

This is some pol pot level bullshit.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 02:28 PM
0

A feminist/communist/theocratic one at that!
/r/MensRights14/08/14 02:26 PM
3

Get "more education"? For what? Seriously, point to how "more" "better" education will magically create jobs? Or is this more bootstrappy retardation? Start a business! Lol, selling what? To who? I'm sure if i just got an MBA id know the answer!
/r/MensRights13/08/14 06:11 PM
4

Women have a monopoly on high status males attention, thus "communication skills", unless of course the "alpha" is gay or non-responsive to seduction, then the subversive white knighting becomes a beautiful display.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 04:35 AM
1

Gynocentrism, naturally; mens utility is measured by the number of women they can foster, inverted generally to belay the opposite. Think lion pride.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 03:50 AM
1

If they don't want legally equal heterosexual relationships regardless of race or class, then that's their decision.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 03:33 AM
2

Trains filled with conscientious objectors, Is that good enough for you?
/r/MensRights12/08/14 04:52 AM
2

What's your objection?
/r/MensRights12/08/14 04:35 AM
2

Unaware of what?
/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:30 AM
9

Anti-war positions are now hate speech on the grounds that the majority of soldiers are male, and thus, defending the interests of a predominately male group over that of women is misogynistic.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 02:37 PM
3

I feel for the girl, i would legitimately want to help her if i was able, but the actions of the mother from the details given are clearly predatory, and i feel that for the situation the biological father made the right decision in making his feelings and intentions clear. He doesn't want a repeat of what happened with the mother with Op, I'm fairly certain that if she goes about her life in a legitimate fashion that in years time he would reconsider a relationship, but decades of clearly abusi…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 10:05 PM
2

You get payed to foster children in the us, it's a racket, (not always, but the potential for abuse has been clearly demonstrated times over).
/r/MensRights10/08/14 09:57 PM
1

I would think a more proper phrasing would be "sir, do i have a right to self defense, and if so, in what context and to what degree?" Again, lawyer, get a lawyer (i know you've already said you can't afford one..)
/r/MensRights10/08/14 07:30 PM
18

Can we please make a distinction between physical attractiveness and the sheer brutality that unmitigated bigotry has on the soul?
/r/MensRights08/08/14 02:54 AM
1

I'm sorry that you don't understand that setting up governmentaly funded lesser courts in jurisdictions already presided over constitutes the admissal of evidence between the two and a common standard.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 02:19 AM
0

Title xi funding.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 01:57 AM
1

Have you ever heard of the concept of double jeopardy? If so, on what basis would a schools issue of punishment supersede that of a court?
/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:26 AM
14

Sexual assault isn't a crime?
/r/MensRights05/08/14 09:13 PM
4

The next level for them at this point apparently is to wander around a park naked, covered in blood(goat, cow, menstrual, whatever), dildo in hand, and each time someone looks in their direction, to vigorously insert said dildo into one of their orifices, while screaming: "why are you stare raping me". I don't know what video op is referencing.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 03:17 PM
3

Parade a male stripper half naked around a womens college and see what happens, I'm honestly curious.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 03:04 PM
6

The only point is that it should be a choice, the assumption that at birth a male should have part of their genitals removed should itself be removed.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 03:38 AM
13

The nature of female privilege is to deny it exists, for a male it is to assert when it doesn't.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 02:17 AM
1

I don't get it, it's like he wants to fight me irl..
/r/MensRights03/08/14 10:12 PM
7

U wut m8?
/r/MensRights03/08/14 10:10 PM
2

Said it before, say it again: It doesn't matter if you're "trolling" or "being trolled". The nature of social discourse has become irrevocably changed by instantaneous worldwide communication, the dialogue speaks for itself whether sincere or not, and will shape the debate regardless. Troll lest not ye be trolled, for that which you shitpost may become you're waking nightmare.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 12:44 AM
1

Those officers pensions are probably invested in companies that profit off of the tobacco trade.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 12:47 AM
6

You get put on a regristry, if they follow the Duluth model then you're wife/gf can stab you then call the police and have you put on a registry that will restrict your movement, employment, and housing prospects for life
/r/MensRights02/08/14 12:34 AM
73

All PUA's do is mirror back the exact behaviors that women use in their favor in the dating market.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 08:30 PM
3

not entirely But the ramifications of the above change might be to include male victims, or to just redefine rape to include an extremely broad set of varying circumstances.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 04:00 PM
1

I generally agree, it's pretty understandable though, pink is essentially condoning slavery.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 03:13 PM
21

Men can't be raped. Edit: Downvote all you like, that's their reasoning. This is where it's going, kangaroo courts to destroy men who get in the way of their agenda.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 02:17 PM
1

Trigger warning: comments section
/r/MensRights30/07/14 09:33 PM
2

Especially if she's got a knife!
/r/MensRights29/07/14 02:32 PM
6

Take actions which engender the nature of the case with the complainant, no obvious exercised abuse of power here! Keep administering "justice"™!
/r/MensRights29/07/14 01:02 AM
1

Dude, I'm a high school drop out that makes barely above the minimum wage, I'm almost thirty. I get it.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 02:16 PM
0

Just putting it out there, maybe someone will see the comment, i don't feel like emailing 4h because of a typo.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 06:48 PM
-4

" ...challenging them | think creatively and critically.." Please fix typo: ..them to think..
/r/MensRights26/07/14 06:34 PM
3

You have never been the target of a feminist stalking/harassment campaign.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 06:15 PM
6

Until blacks and hispanics are represented proportionally in anything but the working poor and destitute they and their cultural leaders will be forced into violence as their only effective means of self determination. I'm white, i wish it was all inclusive, but i can understand their reasoning, whether or not i view it as an effective strategy.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 05:29 PM
1

Matriarchal lineage don't real shitlord. And the law privileges none above another, equality truly, now march.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 05:02 AM
1

Sorry, misreply. Up thread, disregard.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 04:19 AM
1

Let's recap. Legal right to property.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 04:18 AM
1

What do you mean? Because I've worked manual labor my entire life.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 04:07 AM
-1

Then in this regard, what policy would you propose to make the potential for gendered abuse negligible in a military setting that includes both sexes?
/r/MensRights26/07/14 03:54 AM
1

Poe's law
/r/MensRights24/07/14 07:50 PM
1

How about you swing by and get a picture?
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:01 PM
1

That's the thing, this entire sub and topic in general is poe territory, it doesn't even matter if someones trolling or not.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:58 PM
1

Truly brilliant, continue onward proud soul.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:18 PM
2

Treat me like a dog and I'll act like one. Treat me like a person and then maybe you deserve respect.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:33 AM
1

I go for one full length folding and a multi-tool.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:30 PM
0

And then?
/r/MensRights23/07/14 02:24 AM
1

Good work.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 02:22 AM
1

How do you negotiate your wage?
/r/MensRights23/07/14 02:05 AM
1

I carry multiple knives for utility.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 01:37 AM
1

Why do you deserve your home.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 01:35 AM
6

"...failed to see offensive or defensive feminist rhetoric within the context..." Do you consider malicious false allegations to be merely "offensive rhetoric"?
/r/MensRights22/07/14 10:33 PM
14

How will they keep track of who is and who isn't notified, if there is no public record, what would stop the police from using this as a blanket intimidation tactic against personal enemies? Police officers daughter anyone? This also opens up more opportunities for bribing authorities, in ways i would rather not have to explain.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 04:51 PM
16

He doesn't understand that he's condoning lynch mobs.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 04:47 PM
3

An undated "fact sheet" from a feminist group in Santa Rosa? I can use a copy machine too.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 12:29 PM
6

Head of Scotlands national rape task force to create database of men they find "sleazy".
/r/MensRights19/07/14 09:00 PM
1

Internalized misandry is a perfect term for white knighting.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 08:28 PM
3

They're amphetamines, over time they act the same as other stimulants, destroying your ability to feel emotional attachment. The ultimate "man up".
/r/MensRights17/07/14 01:23 AM
1

You can be jailed for back child support (not sure on alimony) even if you have no means to pay or employment..
/r/MensRights16/07/14 10:12 PM
2

She's going to spend her free time trying to shape discourse and legislation against human rights. "...or that sex is private and we "like what we like" and should leave it at that, are harmful, whether or not the participants are consenting."
/r/MensRights16/07/14 06:39 PM
1

Sounds great!
/r/MensRights16/07/14 02:24 PM
0

In an environment of limited means women generally have stronger networks, as men are relegated to specific tasks, whereas women comprise the workforce of the home, which interconnects. If a society is impoverished to the point that this network actively starts to become hostile to those "not providing for them", then they will use their collective force to rectify their perceived iniquity, be it internal or external. If you want to argue that a cabal of wealthy men specifically disenfranchises …
/r/MensRights16/07/14 03:05 AM
-5

Women start wars, men fight them.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 10:42 PM
1

Maybe i should try that, i might actually get some responses then.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 05:17 PM
1

Oh dear god, if only they could make it retroactive, middle aged women having to sign up for the draft.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 02:53 PM
3

"According to UK statistics, girls consistently outperform boys at all levels of education in the UK... The trend of women achieving higher academic grades continues to the next level of education, where in 2005/06 women outperformed men in A levels in all subject groups with the exception of French, German and Spanish." Sounds like your men are trying to escape.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 12:33 PM
8

Misogyny = mild Inconvenience + vagina.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 04:25 AM
1

Just walk away, it's better that way for everyone.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:59 AM
-2

Lol, man up faggot.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:54 AM
1

Yup
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:43 AM
-8

Feminists: Lol bitch cry more faggot.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:32 AM
0

The nature of law.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:29 AM
-3

Women will get abortions if it's politically expedient whether or not it's legal. The debate is a distraction from the clawing at power.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:16 AM
1

Good. But the best still make themselves, regardless of sex/gender.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:11 AM
1

So your saying America is at war with itself non-hyperbolically?
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:07 AM
81

The judge that issued the warrant needs to be unseated and criminally investigated.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 02:56 AM
6

So can a higher court issue an injunction and press criminal charges against the judge and police? Or is that not how it works?
/r/MensRights09/07/14 05:04 PM
1

Gynocentrism is the crux of culturally degenerative subversive policies. "it's for the children"
/r/MensRights06/07/14 03:51 AM
2

This is hypothetical.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 04:36 PM
2

My religion clearly states that profit is theft through fraud, however i must hold a job to survive, does my employer have the right to demand that i adhere to their belief that in order to keep my job i must turn a profit for them?
/r/MensRights05/07/14 03:45 PM
1

Because single men are a threat to them.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 03:38 PM
10

Huh, guess we don't need any form of affirmative action for females then?
/r/MensRights05/07/14 01:16 PM
1

That's essentially my go to argument with any IRL feminist to nullify any debate, simply "pass the ERA".
/r/MensRights05/07/14 01:08 PM
1

I don't like putting my name on things politically, but id sign it.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 01:07 PM
3

Help to abate anti-male hiring practices in education maybe?
/r/MensRights01/07/14 10:35 PM
2

Links/specifics
/r/MensRights30/06/14 05:47 PM
-1

No.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 05:38 PM
4

Who cares, you should already realise how dishonest they are, if their followers are incapable of judging things for themselves then what could you possibly do to change that situation?
/r/MensRights28/06/14 02:13 AM
1

7%
/r/MensRights26/06/14 04:10 PM
-22

Completed without placement? So a terrorist cell?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 05:33 AM
-34

Nice, good job y'all. Have fun.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 04:26 AM
-41

lol
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:57 AM
-43

It's called feminism. Men are naturally stronger than women in all aspects, that's why they don't need assistance, no woman is capable of fighting front line infantry, that's why they are excluded, because they are needed at home to make homes. Any instance of a woman abusing a man or child is isolated, and not representative of the demographic at large, but each man is responsible for the actions of all who share their birth right. It's not abuse when it's a man, because they need to learn to c…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:01 AM
2

Why would i or anyone defer to feminists on something like that?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:17 AM
2

Sad but true.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:14 AM
1

Already shut the fuck down, never heard of it before today/Elliott.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:13 AM
1

Can someone link me to a prominent anti-PUA sub or website?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 12:09 AM
1

I haven't been looking at visa requirements recently, but i might have to again soon. I'll probably end up in south America, but that's mainly because i don't think Germany or other similar nations would take me in for several reasons.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:45 PM
3

I didn't, just checked the bullet points, sounded like the same tired bullshit, I'll check it again though. Edit: read the whole thing #yesallmen
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:06 PM
8

Its funny that they don't see the inherent irony of the matter if they had just made that about modern feminism.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:05 PM
1

That's the point though, they're not even attacking "rape" at this point, just male sexual freedom in general.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:01 PM
2

I honestly can't understand why else they would be pushing this agenda so hard, and in the face of pretty much no supporting facts at this point, besides the "mutual shared experience of all women collectively for all of human history."
/r/MensRights03/06/14 01:52 PM
1

site wont let me view comments or listen to audio, so i don't know the contents.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 01:58 AM
1

.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 12:05 AM
1

There is no discussion, they just want to know how better to manipulate your life.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 05:53 PM
1

I can't figure it out, don't really care at this point, long train of abuses etc etc, alright that's generally what i would have assumed.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:54 PM
2

However you wish to do it.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:45 PM
12

Women are the ones who promote "toxic masculinity" not men.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:43 PM
1

Crazy.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:42 PM
1

Imgur(i assume) no longer grants me access to their site, care to summarize the opinions?
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:36 PM
2

I'm asking you; you were asking "what danger" and in my mind as a rhetorical device that implies that there is no danger, so i assumed, based on tone and location, that you were in turn implying that it's mens paternal urges themselves that are the threat. Did i misunderstand you? Or does society in fact face threats that men are more willing to face on average than women?
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:32 PM
3

You sorry little fucking shitlord, how dare you defend yourself!
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:59 PM
2

A surplus of men of course.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:26 PM
4

Ok.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 06:47 PM
3

Pretty much, that's why i use the term honest debate, because a lot of times it comes down to them feigning ignorance of their implication, so either they really are that stupid, or they're using dishonest tactics, either way that alone refutes their argument by making their stance void.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 06:15 PM
3

Sounds great, guess i won't quit drinking after all.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 04:33 PM
1

You are incapable of honest debate.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 04:06 PM
1

" For what reason would the woman be in bad mood the next morning? Maybe people should put a little more time in getting to know their sexual partners before engaging in sexual relationships." Are you serious?
/r/MensRights01/06/14 03:44 PM
1

Why is it relevant? Why don't you list some reasons?
/r/MensRights01/06/14 02:40 PM
1

" For what reason would the woman be in bad mood the next morning?" That is irrelevant bullshit, and sick. Women shouldn't have the right to retroactively remove consent, you are condoning deeply abusive patterns of behavior.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 02:33 PM
0

It's usually because I'm drunk, and i put up with stupid bullshit less when i am.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 01:38 PM
-2

Good job, dig that grave harder. Yes, you are a dishonest liar and no court should treat your word as equal to that of a mans.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 10:15 PM
6

Who cares, enslaving whites is the answer.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 09:07 PM
6

Your take away, which is dishonest, and says more about you than me is: "it is irrelevant to get to know someone before sex."
/r/MensRights31/05/14 08:28 PM
0

I was going to comment before reading yours: "what adult male doesn't immediately assess threat." The entire argument that women are afraid is so ridiculously insane it really shouldn't be given any acknowledgment beyond a nod, followed by "don't worry sweet cheeks, men don't have fee-fees."
/r/MensRights31/05/14 08:18 PM
9

Irrelevant.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 08:13 PM
7

This is what happens when you define sociopathy and manipulative behavior as "intelligent" instead of fraud.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 07:37 PM
2

Pass the ERA.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 07:35 PM
6

Not just the next morning, indefinitely.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 07:34 PM
1

I get it now. I didn't before, but i do now.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 01:42 PM
2

Men externalise their rage? That is counter to everything I've ever experienced.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 01:38 PM
6

"Don't be that girl" was primarily a campaign launched in satire of the concept of only vilifying men, and how it actually exacerbates the problem to take an adversarial approach by alienating the only people you need to reach.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 01:22 PM
2

They're not trying to stop anything, they know they can dismantle communities by destroying the boys.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 01:02 PM
8

Well they already took away his chance to have a career and family beyond "i go from town to town and work whatever job someone will give me for little to nothing, and sometimes women look at me" so i'de say go for it.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 11:22 PM
1

Marcotte is a horrible human being who thrives off of creating misery.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:53 PM
2

Have you honestly never had someone tell you that if you believe in equality that by definition you are a feminist?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:44 PM
1

Get a hobby, always decent advice.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:43 PM
1

I personally think that proving myself worthy to people that don't want or need me as a part of their society is kind of pointless.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:42 PM
1

Right, but it's demographically targeted and intentional.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:25 PM
6

Right, but we live in a patriarchy where women are oppressed though.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:10 PM
1

Who are my peers? What if they hate me?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:22 PM
1

The mrm exists because feminism claims to be the only ideology seeking gender equality, but in practice they consistently work only in the favor of women and to the detriment of men. I feel you on the rite of passage thing, but it's intentional, if you force men into perpetual adolescence then they are more easily controlled through attacks on their "masculinity". Ideally humanism is the goal, but when groups actively work against the rights of others (feminism) then there has to be a counter.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:22 PM
1

You're a misogynist for even raping her to hear that opinion.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:54 PM
2

Hey, let's pass the ERA.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 03:51 PM
1

I meet pretty much every bullet point.. Like, all of them..
/r/MensRights27/05/14 02:53 PM
0

Besides him being a serial killer, we could have probly been friends. But I'm also very lonely, as most people can't relate to me or my life.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:25 PM
0

Because "feminism" is just play time where women go so the adults can talk
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:07 PM
8

I was taught to respect, protect, and obey women.. Sex was never discussed.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 09:35 PM
1

Hey, it's the longest standing constitution on the planet, obviously due for a rewrite.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 11:49 PM
4

It's sort of the basis of individual liberty and self definition(determination) in a democratic society.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 12:38 AM
3

There are levels of uncertainty, yes, infinite both up and down scale wise, but there are also things we know with abject certainty once a couple of base assumptions are put in place, like that we live in something called "reality" which has discernible "laws" and "facts" which we can test for their relevance and pertinence under specific circumstances using something referred to as the "scientific method". My go to analogy is thus: if you want to debate the validity of the scientific method as …
/r/MensRights07/05/14 12:27 AM
6

So you're saying that nothing is real and we're actually just a benevolent collection of alligator cyborg dreams? Awesome.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 12:16 AM
2

Yeah, i mean, i was already fucking bitches and getting high by then, at least if it had been with my teacher maybe i would have stayed in school. It's totally appropriate behavior, absolutely nothing wrong with it.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 05:46 PM
2

None of that is relevant to me.. I take issue with pretty much every point.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 05:12 PM
1

Hopefully either copy lingers long enough.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 01:33 AM
2

Could someone resubmit under a different title with a direct link? Great article.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 12:11 AM
2

Yeah, i figure it's just a way to reject people, i generally don't bother even trying to have civil/intelligent/whatever conversions with women that drop their relationship status randomly in conversions, because it shows all they're thinking about is sex, or that they view me as some kind of potential threat because of some innate insecurity they feel in regards to men.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:25 PM
3

I would love if women held themselves to higher standards, and instead of lying about their relationship status attempted to "educate me on the agency of women".
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:36 PM
1

The premise denies that neutrality of opinion can exist, which is just as essential and rational a human quality as self interest, and is the root of non violence.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 06:24 PM
1

So in summary, always exploit and negate the existence of those who might cause you even the slightest inconvenience, while building in yourself a healthy sense of arrogance for gaming the good will of others, it's the American/Christian/(insert majority group here) way!
/r/MensRights05/05/14 03:30 AM
1

It makes me both happy and sad that i didn't finish college, knowing full well that i could have bullshitted my way through a post grad social science/gender studies degree never having to work a day in my life. Some times i dream of going back and just pulling a perpetual student, because honestly, why the fuck not?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 03:13 AM
1

I wonder how these institutions make money? i mean, when they're not literally enslaving womens minds with exactly what they want to hear.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 10:30 AM
2

It just feeds the idea that the only rational action is to exploit whoever you can, which blows, because I'm really not into slavery and genocide, but if that's the world i have to live in, then wtf? Power and all that. Every word twisted To suit as i desire And yet the masses comprehend I wish myself upon their righteous fire
/r/MensRights04/05/14 07:02 AM
5

That's the point though, it's all a "social experiment", far too intelligent to ever fall for anything that obvious, i mean it's machiavellian, truly unrivaled. All these little ants, dancing about, ha ha ha, foolish little creatures, if only they could taste power like i have.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 06:33 AM
7

OMFG you are so masterful, send me your bank info.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 06:24 AM
7

It's not delusional, it's intentional.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 06:18 AM
2

I'm sorry, but what the fuck does this person mean by "flexibility"? I'm used to getting laid off for lack of work, so i honestly have no idea what is even being discussed.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 05:43 AM
3

Good, let's make college campuses women only safe spaces.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 02:40 PM
1

Nothing of merit to address.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 02:38 PM
1

... You trust people?
/r/MensRights30/04/14 02:19 PM
-3

Male tears.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 01:46 PM
10

Fuck it, time for a Speedo and pink mesh tank top, really get the learning on.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 01:44 PM
2

It's obviously a leading question. The intent ls to show that men are irresponsible, evil, and unworthy of any choice or rights in regard to whether or not they want to be parents. Even when women under law have access to birth control, abortion, adoption, child support, alimony, domestic violence shelters, et al, where in response men have the all powerful condom at their disposal.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 01:28 PM
5

How do you feel the MRM backed Legal paternal surrender will affect the importance of fathers? Do you think that it would be abused by men who decide not to be fathers after impregnating a woman, or as a way to seek revenge(infidelity, dissatisfaction with the relationship)? If a woman is in multiple sexual relationships at a time then why should one man even consider offering themselves up legally as the "father"? If she "was impregnated" (by no will of her own of course), then why shouldn't th…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 02:23 AM
4

My favorite line that they quoted: “Teach men the difference between the level of pleasure they’re used to, and the level of pleasure that is possible.” Lol, so you're going to work for me or something? How rich is this fucking twat? Or did i miss her meaning? But yeah, "male bodied", because biology doesn't exert any effect on consciousness.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 12:52 AM
2

Calls for singular action in the face of a multifaceted problem are bound for subversion. You know as well as i that there is no way guide every man down the same path and leave a single set of footprints.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 10:30 PM
1

What do you want done differently?
/r/MensRights29/04/14 08:46 PM
1

Sounds like a pretentious bitch.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 08:43 PM
3

But femsplain is quicker to say.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 01:36 PM
2

Especially when it's enforced by the law right?
/r/MensRights28/04/14 01:48 PM
1

Really? Because most places I've worked never payed time and half.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 01:46 PM
18

"A lawyer who works 80 hours a week at a big corporate law firm is paid more than double one who works 40 hours a week as an in-house counsel at a small business." OMFG
/r/MensRights28/04/14 01:39 PM
4

They feel powerful, that doesn't make them psychotic narcissists, because obviously they're just weak littler flowers who are trying to vet the barrage of bad bad men who make them feel "unsafe".
/r/MensRights28/04/14 12:17 AM
3

It's a logical extension of their dogma, so even though it's probably fake, there is a significant(any) portion of the population who would view it as a legitimate line of reasoning. It's hilarious because shaming language. No woman should ever have to explicitly tell a man who obviously isn't masculine that they are worthless, they should be able to figure that out for themselves. Retards. But yeah. "you should appreciate me for who i am". I love the alerting the authorities angle, truly brilli…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 12:14 AM
1

I literally just cut up a few trees for firewood, does that mean i have a beard?
/r/MensRights27/04/14 06:26 PM
7

I've been hearing the neckbeard thing for over a decade and still have no idea what it's in reference to.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 04:45 PM
2

I agree. i am a terrible person who deserves to be isolated. Obviously.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 02:50 AM
1

Is /r/feminisms still hostile?
/r/MensRights26/04/14 12:29 AM
3

I want this to happen so bad.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 12:19 AM
2

Buy four, keep one for yourself, and give three to girls you've never talked to before.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 05:28 PM
1

Or maybe poorer men are more likely to be victims of violent crime and have little to no actual support network?
/r/MensRights25/04/14 05:25 PM
1

I've known a few. And don't disagree with you.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 02:00 PM
-1

I love that you're the one telling me that. Who is this "us who have minds like evil teenagers"?
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:24 PM
1

Because every experience I've had with feminism has been?
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:23 PM
-11

No, every right minded, and thinking, individual on gods green earth believes that.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:18 AM
2

This dumb bitch just endorsed the worst of the PUA community as the ideal man. Gladly single at your request m'dear, (as if any woman ever would even look at me).
/r/MensRights24/04/14 12:44 AM
16

Saved text to my device, will backup later.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 12:17 AM
2

Yeah, i was kicked out of any campaign anyone was foolish enough for inviting me into.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 02:17 PM
11

Literally had a woman tell me yesterday that men had access to a form of birth control equivalent to that of a woman, "chemical castration" in her own words.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 01:38 PM
1

You say that like it's a bad thing. Look at vawa for instance, anyone who claimed there was anything wrong with the phrasing was immediately called a misogynist, it was played retardedly hard for political points, specifically rallying women, it wasn't anywhere near gender neutral until last year, in the UK you had an act as early as 1975 that explicitly stated it applied to men. I didn't find a corresponding domestic violence act, but I'm pretty sure the rough equivalent to what in the UK is ca…
/r/MensRights23/04/14 01:26 PM
0

Totally equivalent to not allowing for men only events or spaces.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 01:17 PM
0

Meh
/r/MensRights23/04/14 02:07 AM
2

Explain? Because I'm watching this wash out.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 01:45 AM
1

No need.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 01:12 AM
1

What country are you living in, if you want the "law" then i need context. If you are American, then i will supply you with VAWA, title XI, preponderance of evidence, et al. These have or are in the process of being rewritten to include male victims. I would implore you to understand that throughout my entire life the letter of the law excluded me.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 12:50 AM
0

Are there anti discrimination laws based on gender? Which country do you reside in so i can research it for you?
/r/MensRights23/04/14 12:32 AM
0

Deference, which argument are you looking for?
/r/MensRights23/04/14 12:13 AM
1

Is a reality show which seeks to include only men sexist?
/r/MensRights23/04/14 12:03 AM
1

" Currently, the only group not allowed this right explicitly under the law is men." As it pertains to the right of free association. Is this true or false? You asked the question.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 11:52 PM
1

Do you want me to answer for you? You're the one throwing leading questions, why don't you elaborate?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 11:45 PM
1

What thread are you in? Or was this just free advertising for the patriarchy?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 11:33 PM
1

Right, but i had to redefine my framing to get a strait answer. Egalitarians might also argue that it's the right of an individual to be free to choose associations with others that they feel most comfortable with. Currently, the only group not allowed this right explicitly under the law is men.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 11:25 PM
1

What groups besides feminists hold that allowing for men only spaces to exist is inherently sexist? I fully understand your point stating that other groups could hold that viewpoint, but who? Why? And how would it be relevant to point this out?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 11:11 PM
2

If the statement that allowing all male spaces is sexist isn't feminist then we have entered a completely different era, because that was party line as far as i was aware up until a few hours ago. And i never ascribed affiliation to the author in a larger association, merely stated that the comment itself is an integral part of a larger understanding.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 09:58 PM
5

I'm not even using feminist as a common noun in reference to a person here, I'm addressing the viewpoint as a portion of a body of dogma. In what world is allowing for environments that are male only "inherently sexist"?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 09:24 PM
3

Your post is irrelevant. Claiming a viewpoint to be feminist is self evidentiary if there is in fact a definition of feminism to begin with. Care to reread your own portion of this exchange?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 09:11 PM
8

Don't dodge the question. What ideology would claim that an all male reality show is "inherently sexist". Name one.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 08:57 PM
2

What in the ever loving fuck is your definition of feminism?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 08:45 PM
2

Me too, id watch it.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 08:44 PM
12

"Not including women in a show specifically designed to be male only is sexist." Explain how that isn't feminist, and if it isn't what is it?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 08:42 PM
1

Which sub would you claim as the counterpoint to this?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 01:54 PM
13

Or they will argue that labor jobs like that are sexist, when in reality they are just highly competitive, and so being, you will be ripped apart for any perceived failing, not just because you have a vagina. The new guy always gets blamed for everything. Also is true for genders reversed in the care industries.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 01:38 PM
3

Right in front of you bub.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 02:36 AM
2

Nah, let the 90lb teenager do it. She's always chatting on Facebook anyway, she won't even mind if there aren't any customers.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 02:29 AM
1

Women need to piss more than men, it's a proven fact.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 02:27 AM
5

... ... .. .... ..
/r/MensRights22/04/14 02:25 AM
7

Vending machine lunch, how can you not feel shitty about that? It's a waste of money and not really food at the same time.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 02:12 AM
13

Honestly, the onion is probably more influential then time.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 02:12 AM
3

What could a social worker do to help a man? I'm honestly confused here.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 01:44 PM
4

Did you miss the last century?
/r/MensRights20/04/14 09:33 PM
4

Disrespectful to everyone, yay. I fully look forward to and encourage female only populations granted their right to exist and procreate artificially. Primarily because once that point is reached it's only a small step to full blown evolutionary transformation beyond humanity as we know it. I highly doubt they will have any better or worse success societaly than a gender dichotomous one would, and wish them luck.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 09:21 PM
1

I don't speak even a little bit of French, but this apparently is a translation.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 09:08 PM
4

But it hurts my feels to admit it, can't we just lie and twist the law around using pointless semantic arguments?
/r/MensRights20/04/14 07:11 PM
3

Just the ones indoctrinated into self exclusion from the gene pool i.e feminism.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 04:07 AM
3

Confirmed, i am a misogynist hate criminal.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 04:04 AM
-3

No.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 02:22 AM
-4

They will fawn and faint, put on their gloves and pick up a tool, every bit of them. Every last one. To support the notion that they, like men, help and handle, in the worst of times. Mud and muck, swept away, like it was the blood that they caused spilled. "oh well, the mess is all cleaned up!" Each time, and always, were you there? Or was it convenient momentarily. As a people can we condone this? Or is the exploitation obvious? Nothing runs quite like a woman without funding.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 10:12 PM
1

Try to build consensus when you have protected minorities filibustering for the status quo, it's hard. Especially when it's double plus ungood to point out how the actual structure operates in comparison to how it's"perceived".
/r/MensRights19/04/14 09:33 PM
2

Blop, 2%, they give away rape allegations like white male cishet men bazooka candy grenades at children, or take them away, I'm not sure at this point. It's something like that though.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 09:29 PM
1

Wait, you're calling me a conspiracy theorist?
/r/MensRights19/04/14 02:15 PM
1

Ron Paul. Anyway, carry on. I hate dem/rep bullshit, do you think the unions hire anyone?
/r/MensRights19/04/14 01:29 AM
1

You only add to it, why was the file released in an improperly constructed manner?
/r/MensRights19/04/14 01:28 AM
1

Dude, they are equivalent in the least, especially when trying to snipe the base. I haven't read barrack obamas biography, but i did download the birth certificate posted to whitehouse.gov And when i opened it they hadn't compressed the layers, so either they(infiltration or otherwise) intentionally released a document which could be openly viewed as scrubbed; whoever was in charge of preparing the document was lazy/malicious, or what? I don't believe in dem/rep because there are too many unansw…
/r/MensRights19/04/14 01:01 AM
1

So do you think the democrats are actually for getting money out of politics?
/r/MensRights19/04/14 12:29 AM
1

So you argue in one comment that the democrats tact is more deft, then you ask in another for forthright assertions from the republicans, all the while ignoring the political maneuvering in favor of the ones that tell you sweeter lies?
/r/MensRights18/04/14 11:47 PM
1

Birther issue aside, are you stating that only republicans use this tactic in a thread that is evidentiary of both sides doing so?
/r/MensRights18/04/14 11:42 PM
1

"Bad drivers" don't bother registering their vehicle and don't give a shit about licensing(personal or vehicle), let alone insurance. I drive a wrecked vehicle that i bought off of a guy who got it from an insurance auction for a price to me of a bit over 1k(i definitely overpaid, the entire sale was hilarious if you aren't me really), i don't even like cars, but i do all the maintenance on it (learned a lot, which is cool i guess). The only thing i like less than working on cars is dealing with…
/r/MensRights18/04/14 11:31 PM
0

But didn't you see the infomercial? I have a condition, that by the way, can only be fixed by using this experimental medication.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 11:10 PM
3

I voted for Gary Johnson last election, a housemate voted for Jill Stein, i encouraged her to vote her mind, not what people wanted her too. It's better than absolute apathy.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 01:41 PM
1

How are the democrats different?
/r/MensRights18/04/14 01:04 AM
-1

What religion is predominant in Indonesia?
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:59 AM
1

Last presidential the green party candidate got herself intentionally arrested at a tree sit while votes were being tallied.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:56 AM
2

wave
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:47 AM
3

"salary $0" Huh, so you provide food and housing then, transportation?
/r/MensRights17/04/14 02:04 PM
-7

Bitch, I am the least misogynistic person you will ever meet. No woman can or would match me, if you want to try, then go for it. In the pit or in the kitchen, dance or speech. And no flitty cuntery, you have to commit for once.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 02:26 AM
2

It's what it is, they're already playing the other end of the table. People like to dance, but games are both.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 02:11 AM
5

Nope.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 01:16 AM
15

Omfglol:: " The big question here is where do they go when they age? MRA blogs and forums have been around for awhile,[sic] so where are the older ones? They’re clearly growing out of it. I’d like to say they are going to grow up and grow out of misogyny, and hopefully some will. Unfortunately, I do think a large chunk will probably just drift into the Christian right and abandon their atheism. You get a little older and start craving an orderly house and stop feeling oppressed by shaving and sh…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 01:14 AM
2

Bowlers my friend, wave of the future.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 01:34 PM
3

Please yes.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:59 PM
5

You know what i really need? To be dehumanised further, that will really jump start my empathy.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:58 PM
1

This guy is right, I'm done with the internet now.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 11:50 PM
1

This to me goes back to social conditioning for men, you're supposed to "work hard" but hard work doesn't pay the bills. Smiling pretty and (managing relationships)building connections on social networks does.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 01:44 PM
6

To any scandinavians, are attempts to legally limit the scope of male circumcision met with accusations of anti-semitism? Because this article is from a Jewish publication.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 12:05 AM
3

Feminism literally doesn't real. In their own terms feminism is the action arm of the patriarchy. "Daddies Daughter" is their only manifesto. "Save us from the bad men". Anything they want done they beg for, "from the structure that "oppresses" them". This is an immutable truth, and the crux. If "feminism" is a legitimate social force, and not just an ancillary factor which can be discredited for obvious reasons of intermixed social force, then please point to one example which exists outside of…
/r/MensRights12/04/14 10:31 PM
2

Have you ever tried to find a custom fitted fedora? I mean seriously, all of the milliners in the phone book are more concerned with wimples, let alone finding a decent used one that sets right.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 09:36 PM
3

So id never heard of thoughtcatalog before now.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 09:30 PM
1

I apologize for all unintended consequences, but i believe this is potentially relevant. I would have linked to it or would have tagged it on a separate post but i didn't see an opportunity
/r/MensRights10/04/14 02:37 AM
7

It was designed by a Canadian firm headed by a classmate(literal definition, i don't know if they sat at the same table at lunch or whatever) of Michelle Obama. Link is to snopes page.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 11:50 PM
25

Welp, gay men can't be oppressed, ideologically sound. Let the games begin.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 06:41 PM
1

Don't worry too much about that, there still isn't much there. The pay gap argument broke down to men not focusing enough on their personal life, while admitting the necessity of doing so for a male, and still avoiding the denial of female privilege while holding to a standard that vilifies men. Pretty much SOP.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 02:14 AM
1

I never had any contact with the mods, this was near on 3 years ago. One day for some reason the ban was lifted, no idea why. I am not happy or sad about my ability to post there, i honestly don't give a shit. You're initial assessment was dead on "i have no idea how they justify it" and neither does anyone, post modernism works wonders that way.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 01:22 AM
2

The only reason why I'm unbanned on this account is that eventually they were forced to concede my point.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 01:08 AM
16

So if you "say you're a feminist" your opinions are worth more? Cool, glad to know intellectually their discussions have no merit.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 12:50 AM
7

What is that rule?
/r/MensRights07/04/14 11:53 PM
14

Nah, once the pressure is off they'll start pedant and pandering to the radfems in all of them again. Even though they changed the language in their charter to reflect that feminism itself promotes equality by addressing women's issues, they still attempt to claim authority over the whole of the equality debate in the very same document, i know they can revert in a heart beat, they have forever lost my trust, nothing to be done about it, and in the end it is inconsequential.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 11:52 PM
12

Please don't use your children for political battles. She is an individual that doesn't deserve to be indoctrinated in a cultural moment which she both doesn't understand, and will pass.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 01:51 AM
11

I am the embodiment of hate, and espouse the degradation of all things good, blessed be the patriarchy, may we as brothers rule eternally, rod in one hand, sickle in the other, first to subjugate, secondly to reap. We are all that is great, fear us, respect us, for we destroy at will, and through that destruction bring creation. This is the eternal rape which we enforce upon all the earth. Never a task has befallen us that cannot be rectified through our unitary will, let us speak at once and as…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 11:55 PM
4

I would love to see how many signatures this petition would get, purely hypothetically of course.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 07:39 PM
5

How do you define "misogynist", what things would a misogynist do that a normal, right thinking individual, wouldn't?
/r/MensRights03/04/14 07:36 PM
2

it's tradition!
/r/MensRights03/04/14 07:27 PM
6

Any and all feminist groups i've had contact with were hostile to me at least, if not openly demeaning towards my circumstance in life. If the author actually believes that i am masochistic enough to pretend that i would be anything but a tool for their agenda she is sorely mistaken.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 05:56 PM
5

In order to find an example of the dangers facing women on campus, one need look no further than the recent disgusting and abhorrent assault on a female Queen’s student, who was involved in the debate surrounding the de-ratification of the MIAS. While MIAS Club President Mohammed Albaghdadi was quick to condemn the attack, he also absolved the MIAS of any responsibility, despite the multitude of unanswered questions surrounding the investigation. Whatever the actual circumstances of her attack, …
/r/MensRights03/04/14 05:51 PM
9

How is a young woman wearing revealing clothing allowing men to sexually harass women?
/r/MensRights03/04/14 05:43 PM
6

Is the end goal to let females be naked in any environment? I really don't get what the goal is except to harass men.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 05:38 PM
4

At least she didn't ;) at the end. I love that she wouldn't ever be able to recognize females as even having the ability to sexually harass males. Choice comment up top:" For the record, I also think you can teach girls to be respectful, and you can expect them to control themselves -- especially middle school students. I thought that would have been assumed. I'm sorry if I wan't clear." Why "especially middle school students"? That's like the worst age group. Wouldn't girls being respectful ent…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 05:27 PM
1

I know that feel.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 05:02 PM
2

Feeling inadequate isn't good for anyone, it causes harm to the self and others. I would never be able to know, and can only hope that you choose a path that benefits yourself and harms no one.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 01:11 AM
6

Reveling in other peoples misery is a bad thing to do. I agree with you.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 12:29 AM
3

In a thread with easily identifiable implications toward intentional paternity fraud no less. Let's go back to the other active thread currently on the front page about mens reproductive procedures not being covered under the ACA, or even just consider what mens non surgical options are. Oh that's right, condoms, but what if she pokes holes in them?
/r/MensRights01/04/14 11:49 PM
4

If leaving someone for controlling and abusive behavior makes you a misogynist then id say go for it, it could be the new "victim".
/r/MensRights31/03/14 10:22 PM
3

If men are the oppressors, then go for it, lead the way, but I'm out, you can't force my consent. I didn't read the whole exchange, i might look at it later, but just the trolling naked woman abusing her sexuality to gain political advantage through manipulating men into violence on her behalf was enough for me to check out.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 01:23 AM
-1

my opinion several deleted paragraphs go here.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 12:52 AM
1

I don't know how schools are run now, but would offering both gender segregated and inclusive housing be a better alternative than one or neither?
/r/MensRights30/03/14 12:15 AM
6

" let's get one thing straight: men, as a group, do not face systematic oppression" Why are individuals voices discounted because they are part of a specific demographic?
/r/MensRights30/03/14 12:01 AM
3

Are there publicly funded religious higher learning institutions in the united states?
/r/MensRights29/03/14 10:53 PM
-2

This is a beautiful installation piece, or it's real and completely insane, seconded.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 09:34 PM
2

Was that like WACO?
/r/MensRights29/03/14 08:26 PM
1

So listened to a bit, sad i missed it live, but i think one thing you guys were missing was intergenerational understandings, if things can be reduced beyond the artificial boundaries of the immediate understandings of your family and/or peers, and instead synthesized (i know that makes me a racist/nationalist) then the irrational singular ideological perspective starts to lack sense. The entire point of destructive and cultish ideologies is to deconstruct your sense of self by framing those clo…
/r/MensRights29/03/14 04:35 AM
3

Are the bleachers in the picture the "girls" ones?
/r/MensRights29/03/14 03:04 AM
2

These words replaced my attempt to help the author get more allowance money from her husband.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 02:44 AM
1

Okay, this isn't the time or place for this: but what is normal in regards to autism? As far as i can tell autism is a catchall for idiosyncratic behavior. If i "don't understand my place" does that automatically mean I'm "autistic", the whole thing reeks of anti-intellectualism to a degree akin to eugenics. Ill go read the dsm entry again with the full knowledge that aspergers was both included and removed within my lifetime.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 01:55 AM
3

They would get wind of it and file on her behalf before he even got there.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 12:31 AM
3

Obviously staring at my tits, that means i can hit him.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 12:24 AM
1

Where do you post recordings of your talks?
/r/MensRights28/03/14 02:32 AM
1

Well my retarded ass forgot i lived in mountain, so maybe that was your problem too? Ill guess not unless they post their recording.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 02:18 AM
5

Not really, my last assault was over dishes, it cost me way more than a tooth, I'm sure i "deserved it" though. Also no edit tag. Even though obvious.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 10:37 PM
0

Not really
/r/MensRights27/03/14 09:26 PM
2

Thanks Obama.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 09:07 PM
2

reason article, better sourced
/r/MensRights27/03/14 08:47 PM
2

Offer constructive nonbiased support regardless of gender, give your husband ample room to impart experience. On the nature of masculinity and your interactions with your boy: treat him as an individual, but express what you find as worth while in men while allowing your husband to demonstrate(not in some immediate sense, but as a continuing understanding), this is all reliant on whether or not your child even needs any instruction on gendered interactions, through competent example most don't. …
/r/MensRights27/03/14 08:34 PM
3

Copied, edited, and deleted.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 06:35 PM
2

If you frequent conservative boards you'll find that communist leaders are generally mentioned more than Hitler, but in the same form as a Godwin.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 04:10 PM
2

This doesn't even address that even an accusation of DV bars an individual from owning firearms.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 04:05 PM
0

I second volunteering at homeless shelters/soup kitchens, or pretty much any organization that deals with the disadvantaged.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 04:02 PM
6

It doesn't matter. If specific words, instead of ideas, are the only foundation for what defines "correct thought," then you've already lost.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 03:49 PM
3

TIL: outside physical stimulation of the genitals causes arousal.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 11:05 PM
1

Till the day i dir.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 10:51 PM
3

If you feel objectified, then put on a goddam veil. You can't have it both ways, exploiting your sex when it pleases you, and decrying it when it benefits you. But I'm the misogynist, because I'll voice it, and the ones who know it but bow to your graces aren't, because they willingly lie to you because they know you are inferior. Because, here we are.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 10:43 PM
2

Look you fedora wielding crotch beard, just get it into your head, gender is immutable, if a woman deems you adequate to enter her secret places you are granted majestic power. Sheesh, it's like I'm speaking wall here.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 10:26 PM
0

So are we at two or three months before the backlash?
/r/MensRights26/03/14 10:23 PM
2

Not everyone comes to the same conclusions. Ron Haskins, a Republican architect of the Clinton-era welfare reform, is an old friend of Edin's but thinks she's being too kind to her subjects. Her book, he says, is "extremely valuable. But I think she put the best possible face on these young men. I think it's possible to be much less sympathetic than she is. Someone has to start demanding that these guys shape up."
/r/MensRights26/03/14 04:11 PM
1

Over a steaming bowl of chicken soup near the Urban Promise headquarters in Camden, Nelson and Edin marvel at how little policymakers know about the economic realities that poor people face. "You hear people say there's not material poverty in the US," says Nelson; census data, the argument goes, shows that most of America's poor have TVs and air conditioning. But Edin—who is writing her first mass-market book on extreme poverty with colleague Luke Shaefer—*says the people they're finding in Cle…
/r/MensRights26/03/14 04:09 PM
3

White knitting on a losing cause.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 05:01 AM
3

This article is brilliant. and i hope the legislation doubly so.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 04:35 AM
3

Is like a religion or something.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 04:18 AM
1

Here , and
/r/MensRights26/03/14 01:25 AM
1

Could you link to initial post?
/r/MensRights26/03/14 01:06 AM
1

I'm coming at this from a much simpler perspective, also one which doesn't place positive social consequences on acting "masculine". What is your definition of masculine, if you wish to continue, or if you want to confuse the debate, feel free to use multiple varying definitions based on separate social metrics.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 12:20 AM
3

There's no way I'm getting on twitter.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 10:43 PM
2

Do you believe that appointments to judicial posts are not done for political reasons?
/r/MensRights25/03/14 10:39 PM
8

We don't vote on laws? Or the people who create them?
/r/MensRights25/03/14 10:13 PM
11

Louisiana not los angelas
/r/MensRights25/03/14 09:40 PM
1

How is that hostile?
/r/MensRights25/03/14 09:26 PM
1

Are you replying to this: " Not allowing yourself to be forced to conform to others standards is masculine."
/r/MensRights25/03/14 09:19 PM
1

I want to know how I'm viewed within the context of the greater culture, why shouldn't i?
/r/MensRights25/03/14 09:17 PM
1

If i am a member of the plu/tocracy then please, i insist, revoke my credentials at the border to reality. Because I'm digging here, and I'm not sure my plot Is gonna yield, even though it's mandatory.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 01:46 AM
0

Not allowing yourself to be forced to conform to others standards is masculine.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 02:29 PM
1

I really wanna know how i rank on the "traditional masculinity" graph.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 02:27 PM
1

Comparing household income without "class" distinctions leaves you in a philosophical bind. The next retort well invariably deflect based on previous delineation. Anyone in a relationship where a specified standard of living for their child/ren, with no fraud attached by any party, which allows for a mother(or father!) to "stay at home" is a defined group. When a couple chooses to place themselves in a position from their mutually agreed upon starting point that either falls below, neutral, or a…
/r/MensRights24/03/14 02:52 AM
12

Go for it lady. Just remember that no one gave a shit when i offered my help initially, or cared what i had to say, or even sympathized with anything negative in my life. "Show us what a good ally you are by standing in the line of fire for once, and when you do, don’t immediately turn around and ask us for praise." LoL
/r/MensRights23/03/14 09:48 PM
2

I don't disagree entirely. However if he were female i doubt he would have the same life experience, or garner the same reaction.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 03:40 PM
2

Article says initial report said he had a knife.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 02:25 PM
22

How in the fuck are police so ill trained, or this man so superhumanly fit, that there was no way to negotiate or use any other method besides projectile weapons? something crucial is being left out.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 01:12 AM
12

Lol, what are you even talking about? you literally can't be sexist against men, shitlord.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 12:36 AM
5

They just hate wagon and try to either deconstruct or rage. They banned me for nothing, same as SRS did a while back, and feminism/s etc before them.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 12:35 AM
9

Misandry don't real, only gynocentric feels.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 12:31 AM
1

But then she'll just blackmail the husband and sabotage the relationship further.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 01:29 PM
5

But forcing women to be responsible for their actions is rape. It's like what rape actually is, except that it has absolutely nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 12:48 AM
1

.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 12:18 AM
1

I was almost certain this thread had a different image attached to it earlier, and no rightsbot to be found. Edit:I'm saying conspiracy.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 06:49 PM
1

you're actually giving fucking credence? but that denies your entire premise. ?
/r/MensRights20/03/14 04:39 AM
0

well then maybe we'll meet again in a few years. my initial request was for you to bring specific statements from our discussion and qualify them as being unintelligible to you, while explicitly showing them, not to point to the reasons why in general you couldn't understand my point, as that would be irrellevant to my request. but you declined to do so. so either contribute based on my lack of understanding of the language, or don't, so far you've done neither. i don't await further reply. unle…
/r/MensRights20/03/14 04:26 AM
1

at large or in definate?
/r/MensRights20/03/14 04:02 AM
1

welcom to /r/feminisms thats fine, i understnad; words are hard. would you like to point out and explain why certain combinations were difficult for you to parse? was it syntax or vocabulary? or was my grammer just a bit off? punctuation
/r/MensRights20/03/14 03:27 AM
3

implied student governement action, a group on campus applied to or was rewarded offiial status, and now is being sought to be banned. hence "de-ratified". otherwise heavy form trolling or lacking in information. i second your request.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 02:40 AM
1

"raitfy"?
/r/MensRights20/03/14 02:37 AM
1

im sorry you were raised like that.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 02:21 AM
1

well im sorry for derailing then, i guess my paranoia gets the best of me sometimes. childrens stories are thusly for a reason. and no culture lays claim to the night or day.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 02:11 AM
0

context is important, the president set out recently to create a task force to address and find recumpance due to racial discrimination particularly in the case of black and hispanic men and boys. this sub is listed as a possible source of hate violence from a prominent black lobblying group. your image could very well be a trap, especially with current attitudes and language. so i'm not trying to draw you as anything but well meaning, but in the atmosphere that we all must engage in certain thi…
/r/MensRights20/03/14 01:57 AM
-3

alright, well being color blind is well and good, but if the childs skin tone had been lighter, especially if they could be identified as northern european, in america, this image would have been construed as being white supremacist, for the simple reason that a white male was portrayed as being abused. i'm not faulting your intentions, merely trying to point out from my perspective how the argument generally pans out. i don't think any sane person could find the image funny because taking joy i…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 11:27 PM
-2

what do you think the context is socially and racially?
/r/MensRights19/03/14 11:07 PM
-5

men are legally obligated to allow themselves to be assaulted. especially those who have no recource due to their financial or familial status. this is ignored not because patriarchy, but because it is acceptable for a woman to use her attributes and status to further denigrate a man by whatever means necesarry so as to extract the maximum financial and social gain. the claim that this would be found through women utilising the male power structure is false only in the sense that the structure i…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 10:58 PM
6

you haven't, you infact denied the request.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 10:22 PM
4

Would you like to talk about your experience privately? Because I'm open to that.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 10:14 PM
6

You're a winner, i can feel it.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 10:06 PM
1

" Stand strait, head tall, never give them a reason to think you're afraid."
/r/MensRights19/03/14 09:46 PM
0

Geographically it's an interesting choice, at the very least it would be a marker that could be used in other research, but that verges on some pretty heavy handed tactics to get data. /conspiracy off
/r/MensRights19/03/14 09:22 PM
2

His entire statement denies the entire feminist school of thought has any political power, as if there was never a time in herstory when the media advanced the idea that women are in undue stress to conform to a specific role, and that mens necessity to do the same is denied. I would love to be able to discuss these issues without using deconstructive linguistic tactics, but there really isn't any other lens available, i honestly wouldn't care at all except that there are very real discrepancies…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 08:32 PM
2

So if you're for openness and truth, then please feel free to demonstrate how i failed your litmus test.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 07:28 PM
2

Move those goalposts by false association. 1 poorly worded and misleading, 2 obvious case of "tough on crime" 3 systemic corruption can't be ruled out especially because the shelter itself had to settle for negligence 4 active seduction/regret used to destroy a man, 5 separate issue, not enough information. c no Systemic corruption is not the fault of men unless it is, if you feel like there should be justice then align yourself with those capable of attaining it in your own life, don't complain…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 10:57 AM
2

this article?
/r/MensRights19/03/14 07:26 AM
2

No, periods aren't required here
/r/MensRights19/03/14 06:51 AM
2

Yeah, that's more than i made in manufacturing.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 06:36 AM
1

Or access to markets.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 06:33 AM
5

Just because okay.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 03:38 AM
3

...and a pony
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:13 AM
7

It's not even embarrassment, they can seduce a man then claim rape to destroy him.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 10:18 PM
0

Nah, the more i talk the more I'm harassed.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 12:40 PM
1

All i can do is describe my experience, you can choose to deny it, most do.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 10:35 PM
1

It was an easier catch all than listing every/any organization, geographic or otherwise, or a sub group/partition of an organization, as it would work in concert in many cases between both opposing and agreeing entities, and subordinate departments within both.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 07:54 AM
3

My favorite part is how "sympathetic women of means" overlook you if you don't bow to their oppression.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 09:51 PM
0

Oh no, you weren't mistaken. I was explicitly stating that there was a mainstream call out from snl, which is the bottom of the barrel rank and file pr hand out, and explicit hate from writers on all of the influential liberal outlets for the low/middle class(comedy writers). This would also draw the reactionaries from the "right" or conservatives because funding/pussy pass/white knight. So yeah, basically calling into question the motivations of (essentially everyone) isn't really a great survi…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 09:32 PM
1

I get annoyed when people point to the difference between the sexes as only being "men are stronger" Because women in general have stronger lower musculature, and men upper. Or "men are more intelligent" Because women in general categorize subject matter based on their inter relation, where as men based on the implication of the one point as it interacts on its immediate circumstance. These are both equally valid and necessary, to all shades of understanding, be it scientific or social. As we as…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 08:43 PM
1

And you just accurately stated how to set the stage for a coup in any opposing facility.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 08:20 PM
1

So freedom of mobility is there for a reason right? Political borders are just arbitrary lines on a map?
/r/MensRights15/03/14 08:09 PM
7

Thanks for putting in the effort to point by point refute, it gets extremely tiring going over the same argument over and over again, almost as if the people coming here for a fight all have the same conditioning or something.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 01:01 PM
1

...
/r/MensRights15/03/14 01:49 AM
3

Just remember, they love men with money. Especially the ones who "whole heartedly agree with the plight of women".
/r/MensRights15/03/14 12:37 AM
1

Ah ok, so you were the one misconstruing my opinion on my personal life with some kind of overarching theory on society at large?
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:38 PM
1

This doesn't change anything on the consent or false allegation front, written consent with a witness present sill advised.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 01:21 PM
1

I'm sorry, but this is way too far down thread for me, the topics been altered on several levels, can you rephrase your question so that i have something concrete to answer?
/r/MensRights14/03/14 12:49 PM
1

I couldn't imagine my father having given my mother orders either.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:31 AM
1

My only issue is that supposedly someone was raped, which is a real crime. But yeah, i appreciate free speech.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 07:46 PM
1

i came from a family that was not allowed to express any emotion let alone physical contact. so i honestly and from my experience don't understand what you're trying to express. but beyond that, sure, people can adapt i suppose, but presupposing the broader social environment in which they are attempting to reconstruct their lives might hinder their ability to actively participate in the reality they would like to foster is not really outlandish, it might be good to recognize why such attitudes …
/r/MensRights13/03/14 03:51 AM
1

The current system of enforcing parental rights is biased in many ways, one of the significant factors is being unfavorably classified as an unfit male, which under the current system lends itself extensively to racial bias. But at it's heart is the belief that as a man, you have no capacity for caring for children. Spend some time here and you will understand why this is in no way the case.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 03:15 AM
1

Really? Advocating for assaults against a specific individual is an "alumni issue" Wow. You guys are on top of your game, go usa!
/r/MensRights13/03/14 02:16 AM
1

how is it pertinent whether a student was able to access materials through the campus connection or through their own ingenuity, are your standards so low that you don't expect even one of your first year undergrads to have even basic computer skills?
/r/MensRights13/03/14 01:33 AM
1

why is the individual who made those claims not being charged with conspiracy and commissioning of a crime? "petitioning the university is the appropriate course of action in this case." because your students are retarded right? and cant just access connections available not specifically through the university? are you 9?
/r/MensRights13/03/14 01:00 AM
1

Once the issue of primary aggressor laws being dealt with in a way so that men aren't branded for life for merely having the audacity to not just lay down and let themselves be murdered, then potentially. But in the current environment i only see them being used in a way that further alienates and entraps men. this was my comment on the thread for that story, if that gives you an idea of my perspective.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 08:31 PM
2

Flawless
/r/MensRights12/03/14 05:50 PM
1

I could agree with most of that. Still doesn't really effect my outcomes even if i took the advice, but thanks for putting in the effort.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 04:45 PM
1

Yeah, it's bizarre, as in my memory it has never been an issue. Barely even discussed in comparison to viable contraception for men, and more reciprocal/egalitarian policies as to either custody, or the ability to be free from parental obligation.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 04:38 PM
3

He hits every sjw base imaginable without at any point actually addressing the underlying issues, all while at the same time completely derailing and misconstruing the debate.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 04:32 PM
1

You are a heterosexual male? What age range? Could you point me towards the parts you think are useful for men?
/r/MensRights12/03/14 02:37 PM
1

Are you male?
/r/MensRights12/03/14 02:28 PM
1

I read it, the advice does not apply to me or my circumstance.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 02:12 PM
-16

Well stay a while, let's see what else you contribute to this vibrant discussion!
/r/MensRights12/03/14 12:38 PM
2

There's really no point in bothering with this one, currently posting over in AMR, I'm already banned there so can't reply, truly irredeemably narcissistic: ..."I hope someone in their lives offline, tries for an intervention."... In regards to MRAs "only knowing sadness",
/r/MensRights12/03/14 12:36 PM
1

Do they even have the right to know the charges against them? Or is that out the window already too?
/r/MensRights12/03/14 12:22 PM
0

Getting into any kind of union job where you'd be making anywhere near what a teacher would make(or more) would require a good bit of effort, I'm not saying like six years of getting drunk near where a university is hard, but difficult none the less.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 12:14 PM
-1

I love being called a lunatic.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 12:10 PM
2

My favorite part is when they attack my work ethic.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 12:02 PM
4

I couldn't think of any other reason myself, i mean, if they were being intimidated they could present that as evidence as well? I understand not wanting to get run out of town, but is the entire legal system that corrupt/incompetent?
/r/MensRights12/03/14 10:42 AM
1

I swear to god, if McDonalds raises their wage to $15 I'm going to move someplace that has one, i haven't made that much in.. Well, pretty much ever.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 10:39 AM
1

Teaching is actually a fairly lucrative profession in comparison to many of the trades, at least in my experience. Let alone against compensation for just general labor.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 10:30 AM
19

I like that i choose hazardous jobs to "prove my masculinity," news to me, i thought it was because i have no other option.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 10:20 AM
1

Go for it. I think it was actually on this username, years ago, before i wound up here(MR) that i was rambling on about how I'm fairly certain i could be characterized as a victim of MbPs. I think the typical replies on that thread were generally something like:"sounds like you were just raised by a single mother".
/r/MensRights12/03/14 10:02 AM
1

It literally doesn't matter, they will just make stuff up if they need to, because they profit off of it. The whole thing is not being dissuaded, they can slander and libel all they like. Just as long as you're still standing none of it matters.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 09:19 AM
3

I'm not even mad.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 09:04 AM
2

They can't because she's a woman.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 08:20 AM
0

Apologizm in the face of objective fact that society is, and always has been, created for and catered to women. Just remember though, feminism is necessary, and in no way motivated by either hate or hypergamy. Don't even lie, this article is in no way about "people", it is about women.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 08:09 AM
1

It seems like standard operating procedure for women to me.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 08:00 AM
1

You just gotta get out there and try!
/r/MensRights12/03/14 07:50 AM
1

None of it is odd, it's all very intentional.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 07:46 AM
1

just a reminder
/r/MensRights12/03/14 07:38 AM
1

Because a male would have served life for even one of her charges?
/r/MensRights11/03/14 10:51 PM
1

This is easy: sado/masochist. Sadistic Masochistic One enjoys the pain of others The other enjoys inflicting pain upon themself. A sociopath uses socially acceptable avenues to cause mass harm. A psychopath does not, because their pleasure is derived through the overtness of the act.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 10:46 PM
7

"One of the most beneficial services we offer is a Court watch program. We attend court hearings to support our members. We don't speak or hold signs, but our presence is statement to the lawyers and judges that we are watching and will report on the proceedings." Right in the feels.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 10:28 PM
7

I am what happens when you do that to boys, that should be warning enough. Rape hysteria don't real, male privilege, patriarchy. "don't rape people, asshole" and that's why I'm essentially celibate at this point, because there are no women worth fighting for in this environment. Edit after reading the article: the entire thing literally undermines, exploits, and trivialises my entire life experience. I wish i wasn't going all SJW on this, but seriously, the shit that was done to me(ooh wait, nvm…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 08:40 PM
17

I saved his article where he defended a womens right to cuckold a man. And when i bring it up, even here, people go all NAFALT. right, that's why they totally supported it at the time until the extreme backlash, then threw him under the bus.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 08:37 PM
1

The nature of this discussion from my perspective, and from the intent of purpose of this board, comes down to when and where an individual is legally justified in defense of their person. I'm not sure if you're new here or it's me, but examples of men being robbed of authority over themselves, let alone there families or their dependants are pretty standard fare here. Would you stand by the argument that child custody in the case of divorce or separation that primary care giver status should in…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 06:44 PM
1

My issue is that under the laws of the united states of America and it's constitution that i should not have to defer to any authority but my own. In regards to my perceived "sexism", my statements have clearly been in regard to my own household, and where they weren't were in reference to situations where the rule of law already didn't apply. If you honestly believe your first paragraph i would love to introduce you to someone. It would change nothing what the sex of the officer was. Do you bel…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 05:58 PM
1

In a situation where there was a group of people actively hunting me down would it not be within my rights to use deadly force to defend myself? Why would a lone female police officer be my best defense here? I'm not understanding your hypothetical.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 05:33 PM
1

That's a perfect analogy for our entire society.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:18 PM
0

This has nothing to do with physical strength, and everything to do with my right to self determination. Your entire argument is based on faulty assumptions and childish reasoning. I innately have the authority over my own life and actions, and no one has the right to say otherwise. Even if a woman is "more qualified".
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:02 PM
1

No, it's the definition of individualism, i have the innate right to choose to live the life that i want for myself. Go back and reread my comments, you are misinterpreting them.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 12:09 AM
0

You really are a presumptuous little thing, please explain why I'm sexist again, this is all so new to me. Educate me as it were. Why are you putting words in my mouth? Is it because you have no argument? Is it because I'm not presenting anything to attack based on your flawed ideology, so instead you have to make pretend? Who are you? How old are you, what race, nationality, sex, and gender?
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:57 PM
0

Yes, i would say "nah, I'll do my own thing" and if you knew me, you'd realize why that's not "idiotic". You're really going to descend into name calling this early? You should sit down with me some time, you might learn something.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:39 PM
1

I would not accept a situation in my personal life where a woman or child had authority over me in any potentially dangerous situation, do you think that's sexist?
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:27 PM
0

Do you really live in a world so devoid of danger that people never need to form organisations to protect their life and property?
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:12 PM
1

Yeah, i was significantly underwhelmed
/r/MensRights10/03/14 08:00 PM
1

Wow, finally watched the clip, that was amazing. I'm gonna remember that every time i cash a paycheck. It's like the majority of women in that group don't realise they only have the privilege to shame that man because the men in their lives shield and protect them from outside threats, crazy. i mean seriously, was that the entire intention with the "jewelry party" thing? To point out the vanity and childishness of kept women?
/r/MensRights10/03/14 12:35 AM
1

I'm honestly a little angry that such a well written and prescient piece is being overshadowed by this whole snl thing.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 12:09 AM
-11

Over nine thousand my friend. Edit: hi.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 02:49 PM
11

That they used the term "mens rights activist" is actually pretty big, since that's the label(aside from mens human rights activist) that people generally seem to self identify with.. Same with the mainstreaming of the term misandry, not even in the popular lexicon (with few exceptions) until very recently.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 01:35 PM
1

Flew away.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 01:32 PM
9

I don't think it's even on the radar here. I've tried to go to planned parenthood before(because supposedly it offers services to men, because, you know, federal funding and all that), but that's mainly because I couldn't find any resources for men besides an aids clinic in the gay district that was only open like three hours a day a couple days a week. That or the youth drop-in/methadone clinic, the county facility was also all women. I just need to remind myself that if you don't make good mon…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 12:58 PM
9

Mark the date, let's see where we are a year from now.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 12:48 PM
39

It's generally not good policy to constantly deride and humiliate a subset of the population.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 11:45 AM
0

The expansion of "domestic abuse" into this territory is just an excuse to cede all sovereignty of the individual to the state, it would effectively criminalize ANY dispute within the home and allow for anonymous "tips" of "abuse" being all that's necessary to destroy families and individuals still under the naive impression that these laws are there to safeguard anyone's well being. The real abusers will as always have no contact with the state except to infiltrate and abuse unjust laws, while …
/r/MensRights06/03/14 05:28 PM
2

Hey SRS? i know you're watching "low hanging fruit" and all, what do you think? Slippery slope yet? Ready to admit your motivations?
/r/MensRights06/03/14 05:14 PM
1

Maybe we should restructure our legal system so as to remove some of these incentives for crime?
/r/MensRights05/03/14 04:14 PM
1

This really could have been cleared up like 10 comments ago, i thought this was pretty good, some one posted it in here, it verges on (is) TRP, but taken from a neutral perspective there's some pretty decent analogues, it was sort of a reminder to me of the reality behind the constant bullshit that gender debates get into. If not taken too literally i think it serves a purpose. I'm sorry if I've been frustrating you, but my life is a mess in all honesty, and i often frustrate myself. Currently I…
/r/MensRights04/03/14 02:58 AM
1

It's bad enough competing with men who want to "out do" me, adding women in there too just makes everything that much more shitty, that being said, if you're better you're better, regardless.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 08:33 PM
-2

What are you doing?
/r/MensRights03/03/14 06:36 PM
1

Exactly, that's the wobble this whole thing seems to be stuck in, back and forth between legitimacy.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 06:35 PM
0

You or me?
/r/MensRights03/03/14 06:31 PM
1

Any specific sector or region? Or more like selling time clock software?
/r/MensRights03/03/14 03:51 AM
4

Men shouldn't need to feel powerful, or in control of their lives or destiny, only subservience. This just seems like concern trolling to me.. You really think most of the people in here are gonna call their congressional representative the next time vawa is up for renewal?
/r/MensRights03/03/14 03:49 AM
1

Right, and down thread you were given links and dismissed them, it of itself might be a false equivocation, but your tenacity definitely outweighs the breadth of such.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 03:42 AM
1

Nice, i look forward to getting banned again.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 03:37 AM
1

What kind of work do you do?
/r/MensRights03/03/14 03:20 AM
9

You have got to be trolling, if you want a debate on the validity of the innocence project then start a thread on it, you are derailing so absurdly i can't even take you seriously. If you think you're pointing out some grand fallacy in the initial statement, which you can't seem to stop attacking for what seems to be no sane or justifiable reason, then you are sorely mistaken. In its entirety: ""The MRM's attempts to frame the "false rape accusation" argument as some sort of underserved underdog…
/r/MensRights03/03/14 03:17 AM
8

So exhonerations of men falsely convicted of rape in what way undermines the case that men who are accused of rape can be so falsely?
/r/MensRights03/03/14 03:04 AM
5

They used to give the mother xanex, now they just feed the kid meth
/r/MensRights03/03/14 02:28 AM
1

I seriously feel like you are probably much much younger than me, either that or possibly drunk.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 02:09 AM
3

Go to /r/feminisms and see what they think.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 01:52 AM
13

So you're really splitting hairs over wrongful convictions vs false claims? I'm pretty sure being falsely accused, jailed, and convicted for a crime you didn't commit still counts as a false allegation somewhere down the line.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 01:30 AM
8

No, you see, they're going to fix your issues for you, because they're smarter then you obviously, and prettier and more popular, so who cares what you have to say you stupid man, just shut up and like what you get, if you don't it's your own fault.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 01:14 AM
12

Are you fucking serious?
/r/MensRights02/03/14 11:31 PM
14

It's pretty great "OF COURSE i recognize these as legitimate issues!! (now, right before i try to co-opt it)"
/r/MensRights02/03/14 11:01 PM
0

What is my point?
/r/MensRights01/03/14 06:52 PM
1

You have no idea what my politics are.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 06:51 PM
1

Why are you in this subreddit to begin with? You don't seem too concerned with the intent here.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 03:38 PM
2

You believe we live in a democracy?
/r/MensRights01/03/14 02:33 AM
2

Good for you!
/r/MensRights01/03/14 02:31 AM
0

Do you think the media is real life?
/r/MensRights01/03/14 02:31 AM
1

I understand your perspective, but this all seems forced to me. And if these are the kinds of racialised tactics that are going to be used then there's nothing i can do. Don't discount mobs just trying to fuck this up because they can.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 02:26 AM
10

Egalitarianism has existed for quite a bit.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 02:09 AM
0

I'm sorry you're disappointed, but you really didn't provide a topic to begin with.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 01:41 AM
1

Interesting perspective.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 01:11 AM
0

I'm just trying to figure out the same of you.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 12:44 AM
3

Please quit generalizing using terms like "minorities", speak instead of the individual community you are assessing, there are cities that are majority black. I would assume the same for hispanic. Attacking the "religious base" that votes republican quite likely alienates many "minorities". But i agree with you, the right is finished in this country, but probably not for the reasons you ascribe to it.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 12:43 AM
0

I'm already familiar with all of those sites, do you have others?
/r/MensRights01/03/14 12:24 AM
0

Point me to an mrm site.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 12:17 AM
1

You said you were interested in who was more likely to be the perpetrator in specific crimes. Women in general use men to commit acts of violence on their behalf, this is what you were talking about right?
/r/MensRights28/02/14 09:57 PM
1

So charging women with conspiracy or commissioning of a crime with legal penalties to the same degree as the actual perpetrator/s right?
/r/MensRights28/02/14 09:00 PM
8

Yup.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 03:55 AM
23

Her entire performance was childish.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 03:45 AM
10

I have been harassed for almost my entire life for arguing against feminism. I could make a good argument for it being the reason i was kicked out of highschool. Along with just being a worthless fuckup of course.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:37 AM
2

Who should they?
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:35 AM
1

They call them "shit tests"
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:28 AM
3

I understand your point.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 12:12 AM
3

Article does not address headline target. Also "...the theory that women use domestic violence charges to manipulate men." Huh, hi there little buddy... (and somehow I'm the one saying something insulting).
/r/MensRights27/02/14 12:09 AM
4

This angers me to no end.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 11:52 PM
4

You're dealing with a community which has as one is it's central arguments to bring some kind of impartial justice to domestic disputes, you know, like when the police automatically attack the man whether or not they were even involved to begin with because of procedure?
/r/MensRights26/02/14 11:38 PM
1

Pretty much.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 09:45 PM
2

Yeah, this kind of shit is "triggering" to me as well. Because I'm an "abusive asshole" who "deserves everything he gets".
/r/MensRights26/02/14 09:45 PM
2

They're not getting paid enough to think.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 09:34 PM
1

"primary aggressor"
/r/MensRights26/02/14 09:24 PM
4

I wouldn't mind knowing myself, a good example of why a trust should be administered by an impartial party.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 02:58 AM
2

Young women need good role models.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 02:53 AM
21

I specifically seek out resolutions to violence which leave both parties in a better place once over. But if the state of the law allows women full range of violence up to and including murder and felonious assault then anyone should have the right to defend themselves to the same degree(return to just law). This isn't even touching on the structures which would abuse said leniency in sentencing disparity and range of action to their explicit personal benefit. The sheer ignorance of ignoring the…
/r/MensRights26/02/14 02:09 AM
1

The specific public publication was for 2011, i haven't seen a retraction or any attempt to revisit the subject for those who don't pay membership fees or get their magazine.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 01:56 AM
3

You have absolutely no idea what they're up against.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 09:35 PM
5

No one has ever given a fuck about what i say
/r/MensRights25/02/14 09:33 PM
1

I don't. There's no one who would bother to listen.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 05:41 PM
2

The mrm is viewed as extremist, definitely, the SPLC lists this forum specifically as a threat.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 05:30 PM
2

This isn't even weird, it's the logical progression based on the tenets of their ideology.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 12:40 AM
1

So you believe that someone can't be critical of groups within their own nation?
/r/MensRights24/02/14 11:55 PM
2

"American women" does not count as an all inclusive racial group, and ignoring the final caveat of the initial statement, along with the obvious intent, consistently, severely undermines your argument. I understand that you don't want an honest debate on anything here, since you'r just rabid and out for blood over semantics, i just find it annoying how intentionally clueless and belligerent this entire exchange was on your part.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 11:52 PM
2

By the blessing of godwins grace, to eventually lift those poor damned souls up to a realm where neither side can rightfully know the truth.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 02:45 AM
-1

What kind of fucking English do you speak?
/r/MensRights24/02/14 02:42 AM
3

In context its actually fucking neither! "What the fucking fuck?! No wonder American women are so fucked up. They're actually reading and following this type of advice."
/r/MensRights24/02/14 02:41 AM
2

How in the fuck is it racist?
/r/MensRights24/02/14 02:36 AM
4

This is why i don't bother playing.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 02:31 AM
13

Goooo team!
/r/MensRights22/02/14 01:34 AM
5

That is fucking insane.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 02:59 AM
3

I think a good portion of the people here, are so, because of similar events in their own lives..
/r/MensRights21/02/14 02:48 AM
2

I take issue with the entire premise, there seems to be an extremely low threshold for what is considered violence, under that definition i experience hate violence/crime every single day. I don't think under the definitions used that you could have a more sound methodology, hence the problem. I can't even get into the insular nature of many communities, and the increased/deceased prevalence of reporting based on status within the community, political atmosphere, or just for funding.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 03:13 PM
2

Only vaccinate women though.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 04:10 AM
1

I will never understand how a country can pass off a fucking knife ban.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 02:13 AM
6

That was an insane trip there: " It is tempting to decry frustrating restrictions on academic research as violations of academic freedom. Yet I would encourage student and worker organizers to instead use a framework of justice. After all, if we give up our obsessive reliance on the doctrine of academic freedom, we can consider more thoughtfully what is just." I can't wait to see what kind of changes need to be made to the legal system...
/r/MensRights20/02/14 01:53 AM
1

Huh.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 01:33 AM
6

From the methodology section(paraphrased): all incidents are either self reported, or reported through ally organizations which are contacted through the agency. "hate violence" can be as little as a "symbolic expression of prejudice." Edit: to draw parallels.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 01:13 AM
0

Sadness. Bit okay.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 09:29 PM
2

Okay, if someone/thing/group is downvoting rightsbot then we've got problems.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 09:14 PM
1

I'm merely outlining their logic or lack thereof.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 09:11 PM
1

Women should be the sole arbiters of themselves and their bodies, thus, even when under a legally binding financial contract established for the benefit of the children of a couple, men should have no say over whether or not that child is biologically his, as it is at the womans sole discretion who she allows to impregnate her, the man can have no control over her actions in this regard, as it limits the womans agency and right to self determination. This is why i will never get married.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 08:24 PM
1

I'm not using that line of reasoning here (someone fits my definition of gay). I'm stating that if the nature of their attack was based on a politically motivating factor, such as anti-homophobia, that there is evidence of this in the fact that they literally branded him with a symbol associated with fascism. But since only protected groups can claim hate crime status, retaliation in this manner wouldn't be viewed as a hate crime, even though the motivations are identical but in reverse.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 06:07 PM
-1

Couldn't tell ya, all i know is from the article, so supposedly they aren't being charged with a hate crime. I guess the (police, prosecution) believe that a retaliatory act of kidnapping, torture, and branding him a fascist had nothing to do with their perception of the insult being an ideologically motivating factor on their part, they probably would have done the same if he'd called their friend a "loser" right?
/r/MensRights19/02/14 05:52 PM
1

Right, i get that, but also from the oregonlive article this took place around powell and 122. i could totally believe this happened.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 05:09 PM
1

It's a hate crime because THEY were ideologically motivated based on their perceptions of him being a "certain type of person".
/r/MensRights19/02/14 04:58 PM
0

Looks like 2011
/r/MensRights19/02/14 04:40 PM
2

It's extremely bizarre to me that somehow I'm the racist/sexist/bigot because i acknowledge that a random man of indefinite race could have a more tormented experience in modern America than a woman of another indefinite race.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 03:50 PM
19

Once they hold institutional power they will deny and redefine.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 10:33 PM
67

This isn't just bullies on the internet, these are real people who believe real things that effect how they interact in the world.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 10:32 PM
4

The original post was from someone majoring in French, likely first year in college, said it was from an education class, that's all i could find.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 10:29 PM
191

Can someone please identify what textbook that is and what curriculum it's being introduced under?
/r/MensRights18/02/14 09:48 PM
1

Nah, just bored man, I've got this, or the Koran, or the book of Mormon.. You need a better imagination by the way.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 04:21 AM
0

You don't believe that an individuals choices in life are limited based on what they can earn? Would financially have been a better word?
/r/MensRights18/02/14 04:10 AM
0

Monetarily?
/r/MensRights18/02/14 03:41 AM
0

How do you think a woman who isn't wealthy gets to dictate their life without "gender-biased" inputs?
/r/MensRights18/02/14 03:32 AM
-1

You read something different there? Weird. What does "a woman not being forced into her traditional gender role" mean to you?
/r/MensRights18/02/14 03:21 AM
1

Nah, this shit is over the top, i honestly have no idea what's going on, probably pissed off the new proto_SRS and getting brigaded. I was rambling at /r/againstmensrights earlier, maybe some kind of bizarre butterfly effect.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 02:21 AM
8

There is no "feminists" anyone can hold the banner, and if they aren't kept in check by other "feminists" then they will continue to lead the way. Is that clarifying?.. I was initially going to just tell you to reread my initial post until it made sense to you.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 01:42 AM
9

Feminism is the term applied to the political will of women within a society.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 01:00 AM
3

I demand answers
/r/MensRights17/02/14 11:53 PM
-7

I concur
/r/MensRights17/02/14 11:53 PM
1

Distinguishable in the paradox between the realities being a figment, for their part solved, although i lost interest after that bridge was crossed.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 11:46 PM
2

If any of you had RTFA you would have seen this: " Preliminary research carried out last year has already provided worrying feedback revealing children’s attitudes to sex, consent and peer pressure. According to the work, pupils’ twisted outlook on sex has seen girls encouraged to re-enact scenes from porn films. The local authorities believe the move to ban MTV will see less children exposed to sexually explicit videos."
/r/MensRights17/02/14 11:03 PM
2

Subtext. Also, my race isn't recognized as being one. So i agree on your "" around races.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 10:12 PM
3

There is no fairness unless you find it, if a woman is put off by offering to split the first date then there's a good chance she is too immature to handle life with anything less than luxury provided her, hence, let her fall on her ass, maybe she'll come back a little more humble, or maybe not at all.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 10:08 PM
3

They will find a man or they won't, that's the game, the woman who wrote this blog got exceptionally lucky, she gets to live the life of a pampered child until she dies supposedly. She is in absolutely no position to give advice on anything or to anyone who also doesn't have a "husband who makes six figures."
/r/MensRights17/02/14 10:04 PM
-6

So if i get you right, you think women actually deserve both the state and their husband to provide for them?
/r/MensRights17/02/14 09:59 PM
0

I lolled
/r/MensRights17/02/14 09:56 PM
7

The problem is that an hr manager wouldn't see that as a blatant violation of the only thing they're hired to do.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 09:49 PM
1

You put too much effort into that, thank you.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 09:46 PM
8

So knowledge should be abolished or only retained by a select few?
/r/MensRights17/02/14 09:43 PM
2

What do you think people here believe?
/r/MensRights17/02/14 09:41 PM
3

No, you see, men and women are exactly the same, physical reality is lying to you. That body you think you experience, you know, yours? Is completely different and you just don't know it, it's just a perceptional distortion on your part arising from some unnameable and indistinguishable feature of your being which also doesn't truly exist, but still has the power to facilitate your actions regardless.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 09:39 PM
4

Real don't feel, only feels feel.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 09:31 PM
1

I don't suffer crying women any longer. They want a "man" then that's what they get.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 03:37 PM
1

So should i shovel shit or "apply myself"? Because i guarantee i could make a union wage.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 01:00 AM
1

You are
/r/MensRights13/02/14 12:40 AM
4

War.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 12:36 AM
-1

Females manipulate social environments more readily than males. A male teacher would recognize the game being played, a female would, and would then pass it on without rebuttal as the way things should be.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 12:28 AM
0

Do you know what the red cross even is? They pick up the battlefield.. If that isn't plain enough for you then i don't know how to count the ways.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 11:28 PM
7

All the benefits, none of the responsibilities. I'm sure they'll use their money wisely.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 11:25 PM
1

Get to your point.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 11:22 PM
1

Explain how having someone manage an ungodly amount of money for me or dropping it in my lap in any way constitutes an advantage, what is your background in finance?
/r/MensRights12/02/14 11:15 PM
1

No you don't Seriously though, how much do you think i make a year? After rent and bills would be hilarious.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 11:12 PM
2

Then you game the system and make less to pay less...
/r/MensRights12/02/14 11:09 PM
2

I too want equal pay for equal work, or at least acknowledgment for the fact that i could be in a shipyard but am instead cleaning up peoples shit. I'm male you riveting cunts.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 11:07 PM
2

There's no strippers union where you live?
/r/MensRights12/02/14 11:03 PM
1

How?
/r/MensRights12/02/14 10:32 PM
1

If incomes are averaged. I'm sorry, it's just that i know way more men who make little to nothing, on par or below women, so i don't really get your point at all, you got a job for me or what?
/r/MensRights12/02/14 10:31 PM
2

Key word there is "likely".
/r/MensRights12/02/14 05:20 PM
5

What advantages are there to being a man?
/r/MensRights12/02/14 04:44 PM
6

One reason was getting punched in the face by a woman because i questioned the scope of the patriarchy, but that was relatively minor in comparison to others. Also, your question is trappy and poorly worded. "that women are not discriminated against and that men are in our society." You don't understand the issue based on that statement, black and white thinking without respect to individual circumstance.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 04:22 PM
1

Misquoted. Insufficient. Door is unlocked and i am armed.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 01:33 AM
1

Women do inherently devolve a space towards their benefit though. If that was his non negotiable point then i might be with that. I am yet to meet a woman who would voluntarily take on poverty to be with me. One at least that didn't demand violent or military service as a prerequisite.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 01:09 AM
3

Can someone explain this to me, i never knew about or went to mgtow, tried to google nacho Vidal and first result was a porn actor, is that the same guy? Any info appreciated.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 09:11 PM
1

I think that if you hired someone to investigate their hiring practices their findings could be used as testimony, the methodology would have to be sound, and clear evidence obtained within legal guidelines. I am not a lawyer of any sort, if you are seriously considering any legal action you should contact one, maybe also consider going to avoiceformen.com and seeing if they thought they could do anything for you.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 08:44 PM
1

Someone else would have to do this anonymously, and even then it could jeopardize his situation.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 05:58 PM
1

From my experience in completely different fields, yes, you are being very realistic.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 05:56 PM
1

Do they even have any industry left? Are they going to ban the knowledge of how to sharpen things too?
/r/MensRights11/02/14 05:46 PM
1

My view of what an "adult" is considers using gossip and emotional blackmail as being ruled out by definition. The majority of women and many men tend to disagree, as shown by their actions. If you feel my above two statements were in any way contradictory towards each other than there is very little i can say to help you understand my point.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 05:42 PM
1

I haven't had what i consider a real conversion irl in years, barring maybe one or two exceptions, it starts to wear on a person.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 04:38 PM
2

Look man, have you never listened. This is the game, whether or not you see it, it sees you.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 12:39 AM
3

Nah, you see, if you actually knew me you might understand what I'm saying, would you appreciate a rebuttal or clarification of my previous statement? In brief: treating everyone with respect has a lot to do with the individuals own emotional capacities and awareness, and to do that sincerely one must understand that of others.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 11:48 PM
2

Someone following you who you don't want around?
/r/MensRights10/02/14 08:21 PM
9

Just realize that they are adult children and treat them as such, Scott adams approach. There's no point in arguing, or in granting them any innate anything, the constant rape hysteria mixed with the "all males are abusers" is just projection of their innate desire to be coddled and protected. So just lie to them and protect their delicate sensibilities while they scheme for the day when finally they are the empress of the world. Its all pointless bullshit, its really quite hysterical.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 08:18 PM
-1

Fake it til you make it.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 07:28 PM
11

You're my only friend rightsbot
/r/MensRights06/02/14 03:52 AM
-6

You actually comprehend? Or just another?
/r/MensRights06/02/14 03:51 AM
1

I swear to god there's a rainbow, but all i see is grey.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 03:35 AM
1

Such beauty, such knowledge, school is the way baby.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 03:34 AM
-2

Look, they're getting paid right? So who gives a shit? But let's censor art while we're at it because fuck you. Also, the link is dead so i have no idea the piece being discussed.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 03:32 AM
1

I am paid less than the wait staff.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 03:04 AM
1

Not really. "appearance" is subjective, outcomes are not. Put me out of a job, i dare you.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 02:19 AM
1

If you can do my job then take it, it's open availability, you just have to give up your: social life, autonomy, bodily integrity, financial stability, and self respect, among other things. Open to all. But haven't met many women open to the call, i think cause its warmer and you make more money inside. But maybe it's just because of "appearance," who knows right?
/r/MensRights06/02/14 02:17 AM
28

I have asked multiple female relatives to find me on it and all of them have declined to do so. Not paranoia inducing at all.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 10:59 PM
2

"it is an artifact from a bygone era" while citing macbeth... Equality though, amirite? Always been the goal.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 10:57 PM
1

Which one?
/r/MensRights05/02/14 10:46 PM
20

go ahead, leave if you like, our responsibility here,.. is finished.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 04:26 AM
3

Good, you had me worried for a second.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 11:49 PM
3

I love how it's all political too, they'll set up traps and go after you in fucking bizarre ways, I'm gonna write a book on it someday i swear, I've seen the same con pulled like four times in the past month, these people are fucking terrible and evil.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 11:42 PM
3

... So you'r saying i should quit drinking or what?
/r/MensRights04/02/14 11:35 PM
1

So where then should we start? Because I'm under the impression that I'm experiencing some pretty systemic and systematic harassment, which leaves me largely incapable of effecting any positive change in my circumstance.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 11:15 PM
12

She doesn't realize it's useful until she's dying. Sorry, it's taken me a fucking decade to get that one.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 11:05 PM
8

There "is no movement" because you would be hunted down/unemployable if you tried to start one. (besides those that you know, already exist) And alot of those that would be willing have no support or way to do anything financially, hence, you know, the entire problem?
/r/MensRights04/02/14 10:59 PM
1

You want to see my resume?
/r/MensRights03/02/14 06:35 PM
0

If i were a woman i am exactly the kind if man i would want. I wouldn't need a woman who couldn't accept that.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 08:38 PM
4

That's just his style.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 05:37 PM
2

I would think that.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 11:28 PM
1

I will never make that much in my entire life.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:23 PM
2

Brilliant response.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 04:51 PM
0

You are paid to complete a task, not all work is created equal.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 07:40 PM
1

Since when is a sauna and massage female territory?
/r/MensRights30/01/14 07:38 PM
1

Because there are people in the world who are starving. Good intentions don't buy dinner.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 07:37 PM
5

If you want to talk about wasted potential, look at my life, this man up bullshit does not fly with me.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 09:58 PM
11

Harassment of males happens differently, guided by traditional roles, they flaunt their "sexual prowess", or use their influence with women to ostracize, it's still sexual harassment, but flavored to what destroys male egos. It can come from either sex or groups.. It's all the same.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 09:56 PM
6

I'm going to remember their rejection of morality long after they do.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 04:44 PM
0

look around you
/r/MensRights29/01/14 04:02 PM
4

He just wants his bitch squad to start some shit. That is all. He wants them riled up so they can hopefully get some kind of situation to politicize, and have a "national debate" over.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 03:08 PM
13

He is a member of what is referred to as a "political party".
/r/MensRights29/01/14 03:01 PM
1

Country shopping, there is no where in America for me any more.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 10:35 PM
11

C is going to be extremely successful in life, these are the people our society wants to promote to positions of power.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 10:29 PM
1

People are shitty everywhere and there's no point.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 10:23 PM
1

Its insane that someone with my political history has gone full spectrum, but what option do they offer except total subservience? Its fucking insane.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 09:29 PM
3

If I'm angry I'm ignored, if I'm passive I'm ignored. It literally does not matter. They think they "win" by "controlling" your emotions, so fuck them, I'll act however i fucking want. "you won't get anywhere with that kind of attitude" "i am in control of your life"
/r/MensRights27/01/14 09:26 PM
3

Yeah, pretty much.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 08:50 PM
9

The absence of a clear aggressor is perpetually the game of the abuser.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 05:25 AM
2

I'm still staked for situations similar. They won't give up until I'm dead, through whatever method. If i can't have you, no one can.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 05:22 AM
9

This is the kind of dude that thinks if i shave and wear a suit then i automatically deserve my pay check. They believe that "hard work" gets you somewhere, even when work that's available pays a third of what it did for them, and is extremely scarce in comparison. I really really want someone from gen x or older to lecture me on "work ethic" again, then have them see exactly what my prospects have been, and if they actually believe they could have handled it. I'll even take them on a little hik…
/r/MensRights20/01/14 08:49 PM
4

Genx don't get genlost..
/r/MensRights20/01/14 08:31 PM
1

Man, that sounds really healthy for the children involved.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 03:49 PM
1

You just described the beginnings of a potentially great framework. Still shitty, but potentially more transparent.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 03:44 PM
0

Oh god, please play big green tractor, i LOVE THAT SONG. Bonus points when everyone hates rap and country.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 03:40 PM
3

If you've got a rebellious kid buy them some odouls and watch them get wasted. Just don't let them read the bottle until after a couple. "it tastes better in a glass".
/r/MensRights30/11/13 03:38 PM
1

Do you mean by coworkers or patients?
/r/MensRights30/11/13 07:01 AM
1

How many times have you had your life threatened at work.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 06:02 AM
1

Explain what kind of harassment you've had at work then we'll talk.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 06:01 AM
0

Fuck you cunt.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 05:59 AM
2

Of course it bothers me, but what fucking fairy tale do you live in where that matters?
/r/MensRights29/11/13 06:48 PM
8

Modern slavery
/r/MensRights29/11/13 06:47 PM
5

i wish there was some option for the dude.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 06:36 PM
2

A lot of things bother me, wtf does that matter? This feels bullshit actually holds up in court?
/r/MensRights29/11/13 06:31 PM
0

I have had this done to me by numerous women, check your tone shitlord.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 06:30 PM
1

Nice, then I've definitely been sexually harassed, i had no idea.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 06:20 PM
4

Sometime around 1967.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 06:05 PM
5

It will be assumed that if you are in an Mra circle that you are a white male, as the author notes, they are being targeted for systematic removal and depopulation. People like the author cannot comprehend that anyone without the "social privilege"(the cornerstone of their ideology) that they are attempting to dismantle would align themselves with something that in their view is "fundamentally incompatible", such as the rights of men, it goes against the inverted social pyramid or whatever they'…
/r/MensRights29/11/13 05:48 PM
-2

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=POwaPdAPyNs&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DPOwaPdAPyNs ...
/r/MensRights28/11/13 05:09 AM
-5

Lol, nothing. So much the same. Smile Wave.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 04:58 AM
-3

Critique please before downvote. Also cite experience and career/field. If you're taking issue with the obvious discrepancy between the founding principles of Microsoft juxtaposed against their current corporate platform then you're strait retarded. Seriously guys, i need some help here. Oh, what's that? Right. What's your advice then? Bitch? Post it.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 04:47 AM
2

Its all about buying favor.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 12:12 AM
-7

Just move to Seattle and get a job on the floor right? I'm sure they're hiring in assembly, they've got to be (they manufacture in America right? Maybe not..), otherwise just code or make hobby electronics where you live. I know that's a bullshit response, and it still sucks, but just because they aren't giving you free money for a course that might or might not even be relevant to the industry today doesn't mean you can't break in if you follow your intuition. Just one good hit man, whether phy…
/r/MensRights28/11/13 12:11 AM
24

This is the first anti DV ad targeting men that I've ever seen that wasn't terrible.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 11:42 PM
6

This guy sounds way more polite than i would have been, which is a good thing.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 11:37 PM
1

Pretty much. Its actually one of my biggest fears, getting thrown in an institution, you could say it makes me anxious, paranoid at times even.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 10:29 PM
2

Just being a sarcastic Dick, i don't even remember all the random diagnosis i have,. I'm sure i could get all manners of: anxiety/depression, bi polar, major depression, most likely add or adhd, ptsd, paranoid schizophrenia, etc etc. I'm barely exaggerating.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 05:43 PM
1

You don't have much experience with modern psychiatry do you?
/r/MensRights27/11/13 02:57 PM
4

The last person that told me to "man up" was my sister, and i told her in no uncertain terms that if she ever said that to me again she would in fact see exactly what that meant. If a woman ever tells me to "man up" then she better be ready to "woman up" by shutting the fuck up immediately, putting on a veil, quitting her job and handing over control over all of her property to her nearest male relative or spouse. She should also be prepared to grovel for mercy lest i inform the police of her tr…
/r/MensRights27/11/13 02:22 PM
14

No.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 07:30 PM
1

Pretty much.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 07:28 PM
1

If the choice was between me, or me worth more money, she would choose me with more money.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 02:30 PM
2

fuck the whole mess, i literally can't afford healthcare under this shit and don't qualify for subsidies, thanks obama.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 02:18 AM
2

How many of those dollars collected for "breast cancer awareness" actually go to real research?
/r/MensRights19/11/13 02:38 PM
0

How is this news? It's been obvious throughout all of western literature.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 02:28 PM
7

Oh man, the gossipy bullshit is alive and well with many men..
/r/MensRights19/11/13 02:26 PM
3

Not surprised
/r/MensRights19/11/13 02:23 PM
39

It's always about teh wimminz even when it explicitly isn't.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 02:21 PM
1

I understood the article and don't fully agree.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 02:18 PM
6

i agree more with you than the premise of the article. it's not latent societal homophobia that discourages men from being affectionate, it's demonetization of masculinity and heterosexuality, as you stated it, any physical affection shown by a male is deemed to be grooming by a dangerous pervert and rapist.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 11:13 PM
18

At the fucking least she should be charged as an accomplice.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 06:55 PM
3

That doesn't sound insane at all.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 06:53 PM
9

You deserve compensation from the woman who did this.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 06:52 PM
2

..they.. Are, still a thing right? Or did they lose power or something?
/r/MensRights15/11/13 04:01 AM
0

Huh. Good to know the jap crowd has other things to worry about i guess?
/r/MensRights15/11/13 04:00 AM
2

Have you ever been? What's the joke? Generally 4 stacks up there with like, real life find you fuck with you, are you saying they're losing their edge?
/r/MensRights15/11/13 03:58 AM
3

The story wasn't about wanting custody for the Childs sake.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 04:57 PM
1

Wat? Uh.. Me 2 hours ago.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 04:55 PM
3

Oh fair weather friends, such beauty in their passing. As the storm lifts and the bay again only filled with those ships worthy.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 02:54 PM
5

Child support
/r/MensRights14/11/13 02:45 PM
2

I love horowitz outlining his genocidal urges so clearly.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 05:58 PM
2

Sorry, i can't readily run video on this, otherwise i might have something to say.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 05:18 AM
1

Yeah, things've been weird yaknow, thought i might as well be polite.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 03:49 AM
1

No, i haven't logged in for a week. But you can imagine i was planning my clever come back all along if it makes you feel better.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 03:33 AM
2

Yeah, gonna look for other articles on this.. From what i can gather the courts called bullshit on her uk/us tactics of claim abuse, win full custody + alimony for life, and instead found that her behavior was paranoid and delusional. Also, every fucking article favors her. And many of them repeat the "but after only a week" line, which apparently I'm supposed to feel bad for her about?
/r/MensRights07/11/13 03:32 AM
0

Pro tip, fuck you.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 03:01 AM
3

I am certain that you are involved in this personally, and denying that contacting his so under any circumstances and revealing his identity is still a huge breach of trust. Your reply sounds exactly like what this sub is supposed to fight against.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 03:00 AM
-3

Not wanting to be labeled as a "guy who posts to Mensrights", but i can understand your choice, although, "be the change you want to see" and all that. humans are such vain, childish creatures. If only i had the same impulse for social cowardice as you, then i too could find a woman who would c/overly control my existence, instead i.m one step above cabin in the woods with a dog and a rifle. This is not meant to be insulting. My own cowardice manifests in different ways.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:36 PM
4

I've known far too many ungrateful twats to drop it all at the feet of pretty girls, but I'm not get to argue just now.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:27 PM
7

I understand you rightsbot, and i value you as a friend.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 10:09 PM
5

Murder is also natural, that's why we humans try to guide this thing called "society" with things called "laws". I don't personally fight for supremacy of my demographic groups because I'm not a child and I can view society in a more nuanced fashion then that, but you're correct, most feminists don't, which is why i don't support them and believe then to be useless parasites and ideologues. If i took the advice of must feminists i would be a chauvenistic neo-Nazi.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 06:25 PM
4

In my experience as a male, being assaulted doesn't apparently count as a crime. I always "had it coming", all the women agree(and most men).
/r/MensRights26/10/13 07:17 PM
8

I don't think a lot of these guys have had women assault them. Especially not with a deadly weapon.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 07:14 PM
4

It gets pretty pointless after a while, everything's a fucking trap. Laws are rigged, societies rigged, I'm trying to wait it out but it's hard to keep my head in it, largely because this has been going on for so long, so many generations. Eventually you can see how people either just give in and exploit it, lying all the way, or fall by the wayside unnoticed or demonised. There are also the true believers, who push even when evidence is against them, barely rewarded for their servility, and the…
/r/MensRights24/10/13 11:20 PM
2

This seems planned. You know, political?
/r/MensRights22/10/13 11:17 PM
1

This it's quite possibly the best job I've ever had, but it's always too early to tell.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 11:12 PM
1

For what profession? Can you guess the kinds of jobs i work? Or are you just going to stalk me because you don't understand what I'm saying? If i have to shave for a job that's another five bucks an hour easy. I assume a good portion of the people on here have normal desk jobs, i wander around between (generally low paying) labor, construction, factory, and kitchen work, me dealing with the public is an anomaly which i tend to avoid, although i understand that i help to "build the brand" of my e…
/r/MensRights21/10/13 10:11 PM
2

Literally the wind, change, movement, i infer understanding and expectations based on the alteration of the environment that i witness. No one source or combination there of defines my understanding, only the ultimate outcome of their derivation.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 10:21 PM
1

Humans who attempt through their appearance to gain greater acceptance, status, or wealth by means of their sexual desirability, instead of through an honest labor by their mind or body.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 10:14 PM
1

So chest hair is comparable to cleavage? Never knew i was so well endowed. I'll make sure to be more modest in the future.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 10:11 PM
2

Thank you, i try my best.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 10:07 PM
-26

Sorry whores, but I'm gonna call you whores, I'm not shaving my chest. And if you're bitch enough to bitch about it? Then shut the fuck up, because you're either stupidly controlling, or dumb, make sure to trim those tit hairs though. Because god made you better right? I fucking hate this shit. Some day i can live in a world without bigots, but until then, I'll have to hear sexist screeds by "feminists" or "women" who pretend to know how people should alter their bodies to be desirable. But tota…
/r/MensRights19/10/13 01:31 AM
4

Stranger in a strange land
/r/MensRights19/10/13 01:08 AM
1

It's so god damn fucking obvious though, it's completely ridiculous, and also shows just how embarrassingly little this young woman understands men(out just humans in general i guess) Also the blatant indoctrination, even if poorly executed in this case.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 06:51 PM
2

Why are universities offering degrees in professional attention whoring?
/r/MensRights17/10/13 06:37 PM
9

"journalism" is dead and buried in the west, the few people that seem to have any integrity left don't seem to want to work for the "legitimate" media.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 06:36 PM
4

"his rhetoric is problematic" I can't take that word seriously, it shows innate bias just by it's use.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 03:21 PM
3

And now I'm certain that i am not in any way paranoid.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 11:47 PM
2

I read the wind.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:01 PM
1

Irish here, dude...
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:00 PM
1

Yeah, it would be nice if the supreme court would get that point too and dial back some of this bullshit legislation, seeing as how this principle has been in place since fucking Rome.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 10:34 PM
3

Most likely systemic grading discrepancies at particular institutions, evidenced by specific demographic subsets being fine in an earlier institution, a substantial drop at the following, and a re-elevation at the next. Either that or individual educators who have a consistent grading pattern across the board for the year which doesn't match the break down of the previous or following. In the case of a conspiracy these patterns might get more entangled or stretched based on the conspiring elemen…
/r/MensRights09/10/13 10:25 PM
6

Master your memetics, who dropped the arguments first, follow the trail. The cornerstone of an archway may not be seen, but without it it could not stand
/r/MensRights09/10/13 10:19 PM
0

You are confused, like a child gets, gtfo..
/r/MensRights09/10/13 10:14 PM
0

Wow, gtfo troll.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 10:14 PM
3

No one has ever said to you "if the world was run by women there would be no more war"(paraphrased)? You sound woefully ignorant or misinformed, think recent secretary of state overseeing multiple bloody coupes that destabilized an entire region of countries.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 10:13 PM
10

You mean profit off of them right?
/r/MensRights09/10/13 10:02 PM
-1

Uc Santa Cruz added to my list of college Towns to bum through. Gonna make a tour out if, hit up a place, stay for awhile, crash parties, post fliers, drop pamphlets, and move on.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 10:01 PM
3

You paved the path of civilization out to the savage lands, and now that they have control of the infrastructure they'll march right in and declare with a strait face that they belong on you're tiny island, and you'll be too brainwashed by generations of propaganda to disbelieve them. They'll do it by convincing your women that they're oppressed, and come in through the back door while you're at work, until eventually it isn't your house at all besides that you labor to pay for it. And they'll l…
/r/MensRights09/10/13 09:55 PM
0

It's a bloodless coupe of America, jfk was a major ratchet point, you're right, it is accelerating.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 09:49 PM
9

Why should it matter if someone possess' narcotics?
/r/MensRights09/10/13 09:46 PM
3

Take the car
/r/MensRights06/10/13 04:03 PM
7

Don't take her word for meaning anything, she can rescind it, or have someone file charges on her behalf. Take your possessions and leave, including your vehicle, cut off all contact. You are in a life threatening situation, treat it as such.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 04:01 PM
1

His digs at the mgtow were uncalled for and off base..
/r/MensRights04/10/13 11:30 PM
1

I wish ide had somewhere to ask a question like this when i was in school. My education in high school was effectively ended by a renegade teacher. I went on to university before my grade graduated. I doubt anyone would have believed me then, but it was definitely motivated by sexism.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 11:20 PM
3

I like how "security on campus, inc's" logo is a swastika. Great article by the way.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 05:01 PM
-14

Nah man, she means blue states, and they're winning.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 01:33 AM
0

http://www.thefempire.org/ srs reddit clone already online. sorry boys, already taken. http://www.thefempire.org/r/mensrights
/r/MensRights17/09/13 03:26 AM
3

It all makes so much more sense why no one talks to me.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 12:54 AM
1

Don't worry about it.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 02:50 PM
1

I'll be there, pencil me in for 4 o'clock.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 02:48 PM
3

Yay hypocrisy! How many points do you get? You choose. Id love to serve on your dictatorship, err, non-jury, wait, what kind of structure are you a proponent of?
/r/MensRights08/09/13 12:40 AM
4

...
/r/MensRights08/09/13 12:27 AM
6

That's called a civil war, get some historical perspective.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 12:27 AM
8

... Where have you lived in Mexico?
/r/MensRights08/09/13 12:25 AM
5

Hey, have you ever been to this crazy place called the usa? I hear they have violence there.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 12:25 AM
3

I too approve of public stoning of whores.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 12:24 AM
14

I do relish being laughed at years ago when stating that s.c.u.m was real shit. Thanks for not believing me jackasses! Remember, everything is literally rape. Also intersectionality applies to murder and crime in much the same way as it does to sjw politics. Got a bitch that's down to murder people we need dead in the community because honestly who cares, she'll do it? yay! If you don't understand or believe the link then ok. Have fun.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 12:22 AM
0

I think the only time I've been bitched out here was on kloo2yoo's farewell thread because i was being a drunken jackass..
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:31 PM
1

You want to say that to my face motherfucker?
/r/MensRights09/08/13 03:14 AM
1

i'm actually pretty disappointed that i would have to write a pointed synopses to get something going on this, i see a lot of pretty transparent analogies and workable scenarios presented, and don't understand why i would need to go further on that. even it being released the same time as kick-as could lead to multiple topics, not the least of which being station in society and false/pseudo-understanding in relation to age and income, and how that effects the power someone can demonstrate and ho…
/r/MensRights05/08/13 06:30 AM
2

the rape plays exactly as it would given the presented narrative, he knew that she was attracted to him based on her perception of his power, the rape only occurred after he gained wide recognition(news report). that in and of itself should be something to find issue with..
/r/MensRights05/08/13 06:25 AM
3

Anyone that quotes the "merriam-Webster dictionary" as their source is either trolling, woefully unprepared for any rational non-rhetorical talking point infused semantic bullshit arguments, or a child. Thank you for taking the time to refute their pointless claims however. And no, i didn't even read anything past citing the dictionary, because that is equal parts retarded and pointless.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 06:30 PM
4

her obvious gender binary is what really shows the flaw in her argument, it's childish. i can guarantee that if we had coffee and discussed art, philosophy, politics, whatever; that we would get along, as long as she could view me as genderless, but that's the problem, people with these kind of ingrained sexists attitudes can't see past the idea that i'm a man (and what that means about me to them in their mind), it completely taints and nullifies any conversation we could have had. that's why i…
/r/MensRights31/07/13 08:23 AM
1

Schwyzer is in it for the pussy and nothing else. His piece on willingly tricking another man to raise his child was pretty telling, all in all a grade a worthless fucking piece of shit.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:25 PM
27

How is this not a form of slavery?
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:59 PM
1

Not sure how you go about this, but that prosecutor needs to be disbarred.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:39 PM
1

Lol, I'm buying a fedora now, i always wanted one. That or a sick bowler, either way.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:29 PM
3

Yeah, but barely, still agenda driven. Obvious by talking points alone. If they were in any way serious they would have used someone that actually knows English.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 11:55 AM
4

"and how many posters did you put up?" Wow bitch, i hope that's your English deficiency talking, because holy shit. Other side of the continent and you just pissed me off enough to go canvassing for free, and I'm barely a young man any more. half assed pseudo journalism or total fake. Jesus. I do love the parts attempting to distinguish a leadership role, lol, total ignorance to how males operate. "who's in charge here?" Lol You apparently..
/r/MensRights16/07/13 11:51 AM
1

This article made my blood boil. I'm not going to go all anecdotal on this shit, but seriously, fuck the whole thing. For factors like "chronic unemployment", you mean like when a society totally abandons/ostrasizes someone? Only to take them back in as a slave to abuse for short term profit?
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:00 AM
0

That's sad.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:35 AM
1

"The assumption among rape-prevention activists is that alarming statistics must be met with more anti-rape rhetoric, more aggressively delivered, started younger, and embedded more neurotically in the brains of men and boys. But the sheer weight of all this well-intentioned shaming is already causing push-back, and not just from the slavering misogynists these activists imagine they are fighting. Perhaps it's time to consider that what we need is not more anti-rape initiatives, but smarter ones…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:29 AM
2

Lol.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 01:12 AM
2

For this conversation to progress in any meaningful way i would need to know your age, race, ethnicity, income, marital status, etc.. Otherwise it's a wash from the beginning. The only relevant discussion is on spending decisions, as of now i consider you to be mad trolling. Delineating responsibilities is very different from "allowing an so to do what you "don't like""
/r/MensRights15/07/13 12:44 AM
2

Did you mean generalizations? Or are you content to speak on your actions? Sorry, now I'm confused.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 12:33 AM
1

Yeah.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 12:30 AM
1

Motorcycles, that 15% Is all motorcycles.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 12:25 AM
2

Are you serious? It doesn't matter who makes spending decisions, as if people have no individual agency?
/r/MensRights15/07/13 12:23 AM
2

Vain women don't impress me.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 12:20 AM
2

If i explained my life to you you would understand why your advice is useless to me, thanks for the effort though.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 04:01 AM
2

Where do i meet women that aren't like this? I'm poor.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 07:21 PM
2

It's because she's a worthless whore, not a mother.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 08:56 PM
4

This is the first year in my life where numerous family members haven't "reminded"(harassed) me to contact my mother. I don't celebrate holidays at all, and only have under duress or contrition. The article exemplifies the entitled attitudes which give me only abject nonparticipation as my only recourse.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 08:54 PM
2

Thank you
/r/MensRights05/05/13 01:53 PM
1

and I stand by my statement; women start wars. (better watch your punctuation little buddy)
/r/MensRights21/03/13 12:17 PM
1

I'm always drunk, it does me well with dealing with dumb shit. I'm sure you can understand; I'm fucking wasted right now.. How's that sovereign debt crisis treating you? It's cool though, because I was drunk, right?
/r/MensRights21/03/13 12:12 PM
3

reinstating the draft eh?
/r/MensRights22/02/13 03:14 AM
1

bout sums it up, a group of women bitching about not being able to control people, feminism, just behind an intellectual shield that imparts some semblance of rationality and place for it in the indoctrination complex. Once the initial framework is complete then they switch terms, and call it "liberal", fun times had by all really, that kind demeanor is shattered the second you try to assert any authority over your own actions, which to them is an affront to their coercion.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 03:12 AM
1

merkel? women and men fight difrent. k? i love the retarded and confounding idiocy of the masses when they view a single individual as acting independently, as if there are no other factors to their stance. LOL MMKAY CAPLOCKS TO COOL, NO WOMAN PRESIDENT MEANS NO WOMEN EVER EXSERT POWER. seriously, look into structures of power, the head of state is not necessarily who determines finances... this is simple shit that you brainwashed fucks just don't seem to get. people are part of a closed system,…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 12:04 PM
-11

women start wars, men fight them.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 10:46 PM
3

sorry, but the darkies are outbreeding whites in america. if you think it's blind ignorant racism then move to central detroit and make friends. socialism will always be a force for using the apparatus of the state to rob those who produce. not gonna pretend that i should be talking for MRAs in general, but seriously, masculinity is intrinsically linked to independence and individualism. it's just the fucking way it is. you are far behind in this race, i'm not sure if it's because you are young,…
/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:11 PM
2

just put a woman on the poster, sure this point has already been made.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 01:12 AM
2

I"m here to reiterate this point.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:56 AM
1

rumors, devoid of context, live on in the memory of all that hear them, more difficult to dispel than to create. it's most important for an individual to be proven guilty. and presumed innocent, if the populace is too naive or hasty, and can't spot the con, then the progression to the next stage of societal digression is imminent. those that manipulate public perception are immune in a society which does not presume innocence; because they alter the perceptions of those set out to judge, before …
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:52 AM
0

lol, it's a really great strategy to belittle the majority of the population, they will stay in submission forever.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:46 AM
7

she doesn't need you. the state will provide.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter