| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | "Having more women than men graduate from college is what Title IX is all about, [Obama] writes."And I'd be willing to wager men spend more money on electronics and associated accessories. What's your point? | /r/MensRights | 11/07/12 05:53 PM |
| 4 | Oh look it's this crap again: "The excessive use of video games in pursuit of the next thing is creating a generation of risk-adverse guys who are unable (and unwilling) to navigate the complexities and risks inherent to real-life relationships, school and employment""Such new brains are also totally out of sync in traditional school classes, which are analog, static and interactively passive." Clearly they haven't been informed that the new trend in education is moving away from the "traditional" class and pushing for more interaction and application in the classroom. And what's this garbage about delayed gratification? If you get to work on a project or study a topic that is interesting to you, the process is it's its own reward. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/12 05:16 PM |
| 0 | Fuck this mentalityA real, adult man would do several of these things, depending on the situation. Why don't I break it down for you? 1 and 2: Sometimes you need to follow her/call her back, sometimes it's better to leave her alone. If you just said something stupid that upset her, for example, you ought to go apologize. If she walked out because you're both too angry to think straight, leave it alone until you've both cooled down. 3 and 4: generally shouldn't be done...don't want to encourage that sort of behavio… | /r/MensRights | 01/02/12 03:50 PM |
| 3 | Wife deceived Husband into Marriage, but still entitled to Property – Courts holdsDunno...spreading Vulcanism, I suppose? Or just plain common sense. If you're marrying someone with a sexual history, it's best to err on the side of caution. Most STD's are spread by people who don't know they're infected. | /r/MensRights | 13/12/11 02:52 AM |
| 11 | Wife deceived Husband into Marriage, but still entitled to Property – Courts holdsHave to agree. It might have been a scumbag thing of her to do, but apparently that sort of legal protection doesn't exist where he is. Pre-nuptial agreements and both partners getting tested before marriage are good ideas, though. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/11 06:54 PM |
| 3 | Trial judge unconstitutionally coerces a jury to find a man guilty in a 'he said, she said' rape caseThe appellate court was referring to forcing the jurors to come to a unanimous verdict, any verdict, in which case one group of jurors or another (the "guilty" group or the "not guilty group) would have to change their vote for the sake of unanimity, and not because they were truly convinced of his guilt or innocence. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/11 12:21 AM |
| 3 | Trial judge unconstitutionally coerces a jury to find a man guilty in a 'he said, she said' rape caseI was thinking along those same lines myself. Not that the judge was in the right by any means, though. If you have a hung jury, you can't tell them to go back in there and render a verdict. But it's pretty clear that he never even implied that they had to come back with a guilty verdict. Probably just wanted the case closed and out of his hair, and it came back to bite him in the butt. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/11 11:58 PM |
| 2 | Female kicks Male in testicles "as if she was going to punt a football", which made him to fall to the ground for 10 minutes. Male retaliates. Male gets prosecuted.The stories are so drastically different that it is difficult to know which is actually true. If he really did attack the two people who were trying to diffuse the situation, then he ought to have been arrested. If it happened the way he tells it (where they were being aggressive towards him), then he shouldn't have been arrested. Shame no one had a camera phone and/or the presence of mind to record the incident. The memories of intoxicated individuals are not exactly reliable. | /r/MensRights | 29/09/11 09:29 PM |
| 1 | The Death Penalty , your own view.From the perspective of utilitarianism, it is an ethical issue. The cost is not just from incarceration. That would be incurred even if they got a life sentence. Much of the cost comes from the much lengthier trial process and subsequent appeals. | /r/MensRights | 28/09/11 08:06 PM |
| 3 | The Death Penalty , your own view.One reason to be against it is the cost. I did some research for an ethics project a couple of years ago, and found out that "capital cases" (where the death penalty is being sought) cost way more than cases where life sentences are being sought. Ex: In North Carolina, in the years 2007 and 2008, the state could have saved $11 million per year if the death penalty did not exist. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/11 06:44 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter