TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kovu159 Archive

View 7 posts and 271 comments by kovu159 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

He is European. Most US states have Romeo and Juliet laws.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 08:03 PM
22

Do you have any evidence that that’s the case? Genetic anomalies are evident like 8 months earlier than that.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 12:03 PM
16

At 9 months, if you want to terminate the pregnancy, you just deliver the baby. There’s literally 0 reason to kill them first. That’s murder in pretty much every country on earth.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 12:02 PM
7

Those are old numbers, it’s down to 52% and falling for newborns in the US. Collectively stopping normalizing this practice is obviously worth continuing.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 10:04 PM
117

Claim you were a woman all along and now you’re transitioning.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 02:47 AM
18

We live in the most lawsuit happy country on earth, why is no one suing them? I imagine any Nevada male has standing to file suit.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 01:39 AM
25

Many places that’s just outright illegal. Vegas is not one of those places.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 08:58 PM
2

This woman is Nigerian, they have a very old school conservative culture in many ways. The man is expected to provide, many women do all of the house work, it’s like America 1950’s.
/r/MensRights07/03/24 09:50 PM
3

55% is the most recent I saw.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 11:11 PM
8

WTF, it’s not the 70’s, only like half of boys mutilated at birth now.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 04:15 PM
1

YMMMV, that doesn’t resemble any of the marriages I know.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 05:10 PM
2

Raising children. The commitment device is important for the well-being of the kids. That’s why marriage exists. Also in most jurisdictions, common law marriage kicks in after cohabitation anyway.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 05:02 PM
6

$100 is 5 minutes of my lawyers time. Where are you finding these cheap lawyers?
/r/MensRights25/03/22 09:22 PM
3

Consistent doses of estrogen would not cause mood swings. Mood swings are caused by alternating levels of different types of hormones that rise and fall with a menstruel cycle. A male injecting estrogen would not have those swings as they’re moderated by organs they don’t have.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 06:07 PM
6

Trans women people don’t have ovaries so they won’t have a hormonal cycle unless they’re specifically injecting that cycle into their bodies.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 02:50 PM
26

They’re going to say that trans women are not women and don’t qualify for the same policies women get? No, HR wouldn’t touch that with a 12 foot pole.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 02:48 PM
0

Which is why these silly attacks against “conservatives” serve no purpose. Conservatives believe many things for different reasons.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 12:53 AM
22

Not in my experience. Conservatives in my circle tend to also believe in traditional gender roles for women, including primary responsibility for childcare, home work etc.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 09:03 PM
2

That means that if people want good schools for their kids then they have to push for good schools for everyone's kids because they can't just say fuck the peasants I'll go to private school Here in LA, the city spends twice as much money on each public school student as the average private school tuition. We still have one of the worst performing public schools in America. You can’t just boil this down to money.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 01:53 PM
12

Not seeing color is racist now. To be ANTI-racist you have to see color everywhere you go. Keep up with the work norms, bigot.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 02:35 PM
5

Congratulations, and I'm genuinely impressed by the U of T standing up for its commitment to free speech by supporting this talk.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 11:40 PM
3

No, in many European countries, getting a paternity test without the mothers consent is a crime. Not only will you still owe child support, but you can also go to jail.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/09/18 02:47 PM
28

They aren't going to go through the hassle of extraditing you from a non-cooperative country for something that small. Just avoid highly-allied countries, ie anywhere english speaking, or most of Europe.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 04:41 PM
5

You don't need to be told you're banned, you understand that when something is taken away from you and everyone like you and given to the girls instead of you. Kids aren't stupid, you know that. We're not worried about the long term lego preference of these kids, we're worried about them being able to develop in a healthy environment where they're given toys and tools that help them develop, and not being told their interests in technical toys is harmful to girls who are less interested.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 10:50 PM
2

before the schools administration stepped in after a media backlash I can quote myself too.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 10:12 PM
6

The boys have access to legos and enjoy playing with them. No, it was taken away from them. As a punishment for girls not liking a toy that the girls were freely given and encouraged to use, boys were punished by having lego taken away. I don't know how you aren't fundamentally getting that. For a period of 40 minutes the girls were allowed to exclusively play with the lego For 40 minutes a day, for four weeks, before the schools administration stepped in after a media backlash, boys had this ta…
/r/MensRights18/04/17 08:26 PM
7

Her goal was not to deny boys Funny, banning them sound a lot like 'denying boys'. but to further attract girls to using them That is teaching boys that for girls to succeed they have to be forcibly held back. Who is that helping exactly?
/r/MensRights18/04/17 07:40 PM
8

They were banned from playing with lego. That's not a lack of encouragement, thats a ban.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 06:00 PM
13

None of that means boys have to be banned from it in the meantime.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 05:59 PM

To say she made a four or eight week 'girls only' lego period is fine. No boy's psyches or love of legos was harmed Seriously? You don't think banning boys from something for weeks because their 'aggression' in playing with lego blocks is 'making people uncomfortable' is going to mess with anyone's head?
/r/MensRights18/04/17 05:57 PM
2

Road rage caused this incident. Both parties contribute. The guy am replying to suffer so badly from road rage he literally carries a gun with him on the road and has repeatedly kicked cars. He's a menace to society and himself i'm just going to get himself and possibly others killed with him.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 02:43 PM
3

Kicking someone's vehicle is going to help? There's a horn button an inch away from your thumb.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 09:33 PM
4

If you have problems with your anger such that will you literally kick peoples vehicles, you're probably the last person who should be carrying weapons. I have been riding for six years and I've never wound up in a situation like that. I think you need to look at yourself as the possible issue here.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 05:13 PM
3

A motorcyclist kicking her car is literally what caused this. Smashing her mirror would've also resulted in his death.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 08:33 AM
10

You do know that men can feel degraded and threatened as well, right? No one wants a Buzzfeed article written about their butt. You're being pretty one sided here.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 05:38 PM
1

Please leave.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 04:40 PM
3

But why is it a problem that companies want more females in an industry dominated by males? Because we have laws in this country that prevent discrimination based on race, gender, and other characteristics. 'wanting more females' means giving preferential treatment to females, instead of 'wanting the best candidates to apply'. That may well include females, if they choose to apply, or it may not. It's not the role of a company to discriminate.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 08:33 PM
6

I see you haven't been in STEM education in the past 10 years. There are MANY resources and tools available to help recruit, support, and encourage them to succeed, above and beyond what is available to men.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 08:31 PM
8

Holy fuck they found big red. And she looks exactly the same. I gotta see this.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 04:04 PM
1

He was pretty clear this referred to "penetrative sexual assault". Unless your girl has a strap on she's not guilty.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 03:23 PM
1

Lol, like this is a US specific law. European paternity laws are generally even tougher.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 07:57 PM
11

This is not limited to America. In Germany even getting a paternity test done without the mothers consent is illegal.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 04:52 PM
2

Funny, that's what they said the last time the draft was used. People did riot and they kept it active. If the war was bad enough they'd do it. That's why, since the 70's, the government has continually refused to remove it after many challenges, and is now expanding it.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 04:26 PM
2

That sucks, but that was in the 70s. How is that relevant today? Because the exact same law that allowed the draft then is still in power now. All men are still required to register for the draft. There just hasn't been a war since then large enough to require the draft. The risk is still hanging over the head of every single man in America.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 03:57 PM
3

but I can also recognize that the system is rigged against people like me Bullshit. That's defeatist, professional-victim talk. There's literally nothing between you and success. Become rich, influence policy, leave your grandchildren set for life, that's what you should be shooting for.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 01:25 AM

You've just summer up everything wrong with Bernie supporters. Instead of wanting to succeed you want to "bring the upper class down".
/r/MensRights31/01/16 07:51 PM
14

What exactly makes him a douchebag? That's a terrible attitude to have towards someone just because he's successful.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 06:04 PM
1

About 70/30 in my program for undergrad, then my grad school was about 60/40.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 06:26 PM
1

I have been at one of the top engineering schools listed here (wrong coast to be ivy), and yes.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 02:25 AM
1

Right, but your entire point is an assumption. "If even 30%" etc. Do you have any evidence that any percent of top students look at gender ratio of an ivy league as a decision making criteria? Because that's not my experience having gone through this first hand. I agree, IF 30% were actually not applying then sure it would be a problem. But is it? Is it even 5%? None?
/r/MensRights19/01/16 10:38 PM
1

From my experiences at two of the good schools listed in this article, students picked the top school because of its academics and reputation, then the culture was a side benefit after they got here. Talking to friends who choose more second-tier colleges, some of that decision came down to "party culture", but again it was secondary. I'd need to see actual evidence of gender ratio affecting applications to believe it was causing a real problem rather than just some talk after the fact. Caltech …
/r/MensRights19/01/16 07:40 PM
1

It is outlining the results of different gender ratios, it has no evidence that people choose a school based on that ratio. Quality of education trumps all, I don't see Caltech having any issues recruiting man with its 59% ratio.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 04:18 PM
4

You think college kids didn't have sex before mandatory gender ratios? Come the fuck on. Also, I cared much more about getting into an Ivy league school than about how many girls would be there. I wouldn't have said 'no' to Yale if the ratio was 30/70 because I couldn't be bothered to go date people from more than a half mile away. Sex is way down on the list of priorities for kids applying to top tier schools. If they just wanted sex they'd go to UCSB or Penn State or something, not MIT. Trying…
/r/MensRights18/01/16 09:24 PM
1

You want an out of the blue example of literal neuroplasticity changing a genetic instinct after we learn from our parents? Listen to this. the structure of the brain literally changes with conditioning.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 04:19 PM
1

Humans have overcome instinct for thousands of years with technological advances and other changes to society. I'm sorry that you can't see that, and seem unwilling to learn.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 04:04 PM
0

I'll let you think just a little harder first, you'll figure it out. I have faith.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 05:05 AM
-1

They are still the same thing to our biology, people still want to fuck. If you think fucking today is the same as fucking before contraceptives existed in terms of it's place in society, you are competently ignorant. It's a prefect analogy to demonstrate how technology changes gender roles.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 05:04 AM
-2

Polygamy is a legal terminology and therefore irrelevant in the discussion of biological or psychological evolution. The Selective Service is legal terminology, yet it's a sign of an underlying culture. The laws against polygamy are the same. But men having multiple sexual partners is relatively common and widely accepted throughout the world. Where in the world is a man having children with multiple women preferred compared to monogamous marriage-like partnerships and 2-parent family situations…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:41 AM
0

The point is that it's not instinct, it's culture. Culture does change within a few generations. In our great-great grandfathers time the worlds population still took massive hits from disease, war and famine, and protecting women was very important. That doesn't happen anymore. If you believe otherwise, please cite your claims. You're the one asserting it is.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:23 AM
0

These behaviours aren't purely cultural simply because they have to come from somewhere. That somewhere is 'our cultural upbringing'. It wasn't too many years ago when we had massive wars, disease and famine wiping out massive swatches of the human population. Keeping women safe was necessary. That time is past, and only in the last 150ish years. We eliminated those risks, but your great-great-grandparents lived it, and it structured our society in ways that will take a few more years to elimina…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:09 AM
-1

Uh, no. That's called technological advances to better hunting methods. Those same technological advances eliminated the need to 'fight to keep women safe' because people don't die of war, famine, or disease anymore.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:07 AM
-2

Polygamy is evolutionary psychology, we don't allow that in the civilized world either. I take it you're against equal rights then? And support male disposability? Those are just evolutionary facts.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 01:32 AM
-1

Just like running our food to death over the plains of Africa is 'genetic', we moved past that and have changed. Sorry.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 01:30 AM
0

The most valuable members of a community is always the females, and the children. You need females to sustain population, but you only need one male(this will lead to genetic defects,but the population will still manage. This does not apply to modern society. That applied to ancient tribes, early cities, etc. Unless a major, major amount of the population was at risk, this doesn't apply. It's a cultural hangover from when it did matter.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 09:52 PM
0

If America loses it, then that's a sign that they should have been losing it every time that happened to a man. Men are program to protect Women. PERIOD. End of discussion. There is NO OTHER REASON for men to exists. 200 000 years of evolution over 8000 Generations of selective breading. You will not change it. I can't tell if you're trolling or if you're just crazy.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:13 PM
4

What happens when they are taken prisoner and tortured and raped and IsIS releases videos of them raping them and cutting their tits off? The same thing that happens when ISIS release video of male prisoners being raped and tortured and cutting their heads off with dull knives.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:12 PM
-4

It's not 'genetic', it's cultural.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:09 PM
-16

Women can pull women their own size.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:08 PM
18

Literally impossible in the UK. Rape by law requires a penis.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 09:36 PM
0

They built a bunch of buildings, many of which are unsafe and fell over, a bunch of buildings that are unsafe, that are in the middle of nowhere and are completely empty. You know nothing about modern China. I'd be shocked if you even have a passport. I'm not going to waste my time.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 10:47 PM
2

Arrogance is how all old empires fail. You're ignoring facts (obesity, growth) and only thinking about right now. There are not enough military-aged, healthy people in America to fight a WWII sized assault. America is literally too fat.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:30 PM
0

China built a system larger than the entire US Interstate in 15 years. They built a larger high speed rail system than all of Europe in 15 years. Shit, they built literally thousands of cities in that same time frame. If they want naval superiority, they can have it in a decade. They have the money and the technology, but chose to invest in infrastructure right now instead. Nuking their naval carriers would mean nuclear retaliation, as China has promised to do. There is literally no missile defe…
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:27 PM
1

Their air force and navy are rapidly catching up. That said... Even then, we have more than enough people enlisted to deal with that, and wouldn't need a draft. "In about five years, so many young Americans will be grossly overweight that the military will be unable to recruit enough qualified soldiers." America is literally getting too fat to fight.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:17 PM
0

There's no reason for them too, but their military force is growing at a much faster rate than the US. Like their industrial power and their economic power, it will eventually pass the US. America's nuclear force was built in the 60's, it would need a whole lot of work to get past modern Chinese missile defense.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:14 PM
1

China either passed or will shortly pass the USA as the largest economy. Their have longer range nuclear missiles, a more modern missile defense system, a space program, and a rapidly growing navy. China has built more infrastructure than the entire USA in just 20 years.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 08:39 PM
3

You might want to check up on the Chinese military powers. They would never attack for economic reasons, but they certainly will have the power to shortly in a few years. This is a country that went from 0 expressways in the 90's to a system larger than the whole US in 15 years. 0 high speed rail in the 90's to more than the rest of the world combined. They have longer range ICBM's than the American military, a space program, and the largest investments in nuclear power on earth. They also have …
/r/MensRights07/12/15 08:36 PM
4

That's basically where we are right now. The draft hasn't been used in any overseas war since the 70's.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 08:32 PM
4

Fraternities still exist. Highly, highly recommended.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:59 PM
7

They should have both been treated the same for committing the same crime.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 03:06 PM
2

I guess that makes sense. High school was fun. Free time, easy girls, good friends. College was similar with more professional work, but much the same socially. Same now in work, just harder to find people my own age. It's all been really linear.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 01:37 AM
1

Or just clothes and stop giving a fuck what kids wear.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 09:47 PM
5

Uh, so strange you're trying this an American issue, when school uniforms and their strict enforcement is vastly more common in Europe.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 09:46 PM
-4

You don't understand what 'socially stunted' means.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 06:07 PM
13

What kind of school did you go to?!? The exact same rules of how to behave professionally in a working environment learned in highschool carried through into the workplace.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 06:06 PM

And have a bunch of socially stunned kids putting into universities? No. Social skills learned in high school are as important as the course material.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 05:28 PM
3

It's very easy to tell by a girls past if this is something she'd do.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 05:13 AM
1

The difference is if you touch a female striper is a problem. That law must very state to state, because here it's encouraged, not a problem.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 02:39 AM
1

Go to Hawaii.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 02:38 AM
9

And when she starts biting and kicking while you're holding her, just sit there taking it until the police arrive? Yeah, that'll put you in the hospital.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:31 PM
1

The U of T doesn't participate in that rating, that's why they're nowhere on the list. It's explained in your link. (re undergrad research) Are you sure? If you are, that's seriously a game-changer for me. Absolutely. Summer research positions were available to all after first year, profs helped students get grants if they needed them and offered their own funding, and a year long fourth year research thesis program where they matched you with professors and industry partners (if applicable) are…
/r/MensRights29/06/15 03:53 PM
1

Sources for that? It varies greatly by department (departments at u of t are bigger than most universities in Canada.) undergrad students working in research is incredibly common in STEM fields and U of T engineering, including undergrad is top 10 in the world. Placing more emphasis on marks for admission is a good thing, rather than relying on diversity targets, sob stories, family connections and money. It's not Ivy League, it's Canadian, so it can't be. It is the top school in Canada.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 07:50 AM
1

U of T has essays and interviews for all but the easiest degrees.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 07:20 AM
2

Except if we can make them hear something for doing nothing, it makes it worth their while.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 06:56 PM
3

The fat kid is gonna benefit from exercise no matter what his home life is like. Fat kids area national problem we should be trying to eliminate any way we can.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:52 PM
2

Human nature? You mean patriarchy, you shitlord.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:49 PM
6

Or the state could pay for rape babies and punish the rapist. I'd rather my taxes pay for that than the victim.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 12:23 PM
19

I'm so glad that my university scholarship only has three variables. Grades, your income, parents income.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 02:32 PM
1

University of Toronto already has this. They send people around like 3 times before the hours start telling men they need to start leaving. They're in the middle of the day and impact a lot of people. I was able to get my sports centre fees reimbursed and signed up for a coed gym close next to campus by my house.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 01:15 AM
3

I'm gonna go buy a fifth of vodka and a new Porsche, in that order.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 01:18 AM
1

"I identify as a domestic cat therian" Oh lawd what have I stumbled upon here...
/r/MensRights05/02/15 10:14 PM
3

It's something that literally never crosses my mind. Maybe I live in a good city but I've never even considered that I might be in danger.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 03:33 AM
5

This is breakup worthy, mate.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 12:39 AM
10

What's really scary is in that some countries, getting a paternity test without the mothers consent is a crime. This statistic should scare the shit out of people.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 02:37 AM
1

Good for him? Different social circles work differently. Everyone in my wakeboarding club for example uses Facebook as the calendar, if people had to chase you down to go sure they would, but it would be a needless extra step because you chose to be the one person out. I don't enjoy intentionally wasting people's time. My time is valuable and so is everyone elses. If you're liked enough people will invite you on your medium of choice. Great, use mail then.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 04:39 AM
3

Then it must have gotten better. It's literally ubiquitous now, I don't know a single person who doesn't use it whos involved in any campus social groups.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 04:04 AM
3

My moleskin would lack an Internet connection for other people to add things to it. I usually get 2-5 invites a day to stuff appearing in my Facebook calendar from groups I'm involved with. This is how people let others know about events in the Uni world. I don't go actively checking in with everyone all the time to see what's up.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 03:32 AM
9

Facebook is pretty essential if you're involved in a lot of social groups. That's the only way I know everything that's going on between uni parties, my fraternity, school clubs, social sports, work events, etc etc. There's no other one place that tracks all that.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/14 11:36 PM
3

This might fall under the 'good publicity' catagory if political opponents tried to use it against you. They would literally be attacking a victim of an unprovoked physical assault, with video evidence.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 12:08 AM
1

Go to Australia. Most of the good parts of the UK with a more rational approach to life.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/14 08:01 PM
7

No, it's the entire point. Baseless claims with no evidence and no finding of guilt don't deserve power.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 10:53 PM
12

No, there should need to be an actual finding of fault or strong evidence. A single report is not enough evidence to affect the lives of thousands of students and sully the reputations of these organizations. when someone comes forward with serious accusations That's the same thing as saying anyone can make up a claim, call it in and shut down everything whenever they want. "Oh but that never happens"? How many more high profile false allegation cases like this do you need? They've been going on…
/r/MensRights06/12/14 10:12 PM
20

So you're saying anyone should have the ability to shut down all fraternities and sororities whenever they want with a single phone call? With no evidence or actual finding of guilt? And I don't think fraternities have been restored yet.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 08:38 PM

They suspended these organizations, which is very significant. The crys to ban fraternities as a 'breeding ground of misogyny and rape" was everywhere. Should they have just done nothing? They should have started an investigation and acted on the findings. Which, in this case, showed it was all BS.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 08:09 PM
1

In those cases it is as relevant a hobby as, say, tennis.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/14 02:23 PM
6

if you really want to have the most "juice" towards your goals, then any hobby that serves as an escape or release is negative You must not work in tech. Even in the very highest levels venture-capital and cutting-edge start ups to make a lot of money and have a lot of high status individuals video games are a common tool for socializing. It's like being able to talk sports at a blue-collar job. It's just something you have to know in order to fit in and advance with the top level.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/14 08:35 AM
1

I just go through rather large periods of time where I literally don't care about women. At all. I'm so focused on my career, making money, traveling, learning, that I'll just ignore women and turn down advances because I have better shit to do. When I do really want a woman I go and get her. Not everyone cares that much about the 'female rat race'. I opted out basically from the beginning and dabble when I'm bored.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 08:31 PM
2

You're forgetting that a few thousand dollars for a drink is not even a measurable amount of money for these people. It would be like fractions of a penny for you.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/14 06:46 AM
2

Not everyone sees nightclub debauchery as that much fun. Even when being the center of attention in a club, I'd much rather be somewhere else.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/14 06:41 AM
51

Of, if you don't, it's because she wants you.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/14 06:32 AM
6

A large number of people on here are younger guys, students, for whom $5000 to get seriously into scuba diving might not be practical for them until they're working full time. They might want to know that getting involved in a sailing club offers many similar benefits for a fraction of the cost. Sure, more money is obviously better than less money. I build and race rally cars which is a giant black hole of money but something I passionately enjoy. But, just because someone cant afford to build r…
/r/TheRedPill26/11/14 01:58 AM
4

Another useful column to add to all this would be cost. Something like rock climbing costs $100-$500 in gear to get going while running is <$200 to start. Mountain biking will run you $2000 for a decent starter bike while an art class is <$100.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/14 12:22 AM
6

Terrific Post. Here's a handy fiilterable Excel sheet with numbers instead of X's to let you easily find the best activies for what you're looking for. If you want to get really fancy you can use the sums of the rows and columns to optimize your interests for a limited number of activities and a target score in each column.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/14 12:19 AM
7

40hrs/week at a desk. When I get home, I'm usually too tired to go to the gym or walk our dog Because an 8 hour a day government desk job is so fucking hard to handle. I put in nearly twice that in finance roles that are actually stressful and still manage to get a lot of exercise in.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/14 04:05 AM

Please send us a followup. I'm a student in Toronto with similar craziness starting to take root, I'd love to know what comes of this for you.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 07:14 PM
0

This time of year is when we hold alumni banquets and formals with sororities. This would be the second worst time of the year to suspend fraternities, the first being during rush.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 04:38 PM
2

Why is everybody system on making up their own percentages?
/r/TheRedPill20/11/14 06:41 AM
1

I did when I started out. Body fat percentage went down from 11% to 8% and I gained 10 lbs at a little less than three months. But that was training basically 5 days a week.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/14 06:04 AM
7

Absolutely. But, it got me where I wanted to be, and a full time work week now feels like vacation to me compared to the hours I worked in college. 2 years of full on monk mode though, then 2 more of a decent balance. Makes me pissed off when people say 'if you weren't picking up girls weekly in college you're such a loser'. Yeah right, it built my skills, connections and work ethic that means I'm basically set for life.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/14 06:33 AM
3

But getting beyond a quant bitch job at a bank takes a lot of good social skills.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/14 04:24 AM
14

Or are busy studying and working. Having 1-2 hours free a week doesn't make for much of a social life, and tons of people have to put in those hours.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/14 04:22 AM
2

U of T has the first mens center on campus in Canada, and is where the Canadian Federation for Equality (a mens rights group) is very active. Feminists are absolutely furious about it, protesting every event until the police show up. That's progress, probably the most progressive school in Canada for mens rights. That shit doesn't even get off the ground in other places in Canada.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/14 04:18 AM
1

There are explicity restrictions on 'freedom of expression' that limit expression that can be construed of inciting violence, political unrest, and a host of other things.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/14 06:36 PM
12

There are some significant cultural and legal differences.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/14 05:13 PM
0

Accutane. Cure it once forever.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 06:44 PM
10

Fuck off. Standards change around the country, around the world, and by social groups. What works for you is considered sissy in some places, what is scruffy in some places is manly elsewhere. You're making personal attacks instead of actually dealing with criticism. Lot's of major cities aren't full of metrosexuals. You have a long way to go.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 06:40 PM
7

Apparently the girls you know have different ideas of what 'current ideal' is. Around here that is considered a little gay by most women.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 06:22 PM
0

as men, we generally don't care if a woman doesn't have friends, doesn't have a job, or doesn't go to school. What guys are you talking too? That would embarrassing. I only date women who I actually like, and that means having a real brain.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/14 07:15 PM
3

You don't actually know anything about the guy besides that one fact. Hard to judge his SMV.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/14 06:54 PM
6

It's also not rare to get comments as a good looking man either. At least in a decent sized city.
/r/TheRedPill01/11/14 04:31 PM
1

Make them buy you drinks. Boom, attractive girls buying drinks.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/14 10:24 PM
1

My province made it illegal to discriminate on insurance across the board. My health insurance went up but my car insurance went way down.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 03:48 AM
4

in this case, he got the show cancelled That's exactly what he wanted to do. He wasn't there intentionally to bully these guys, he was there to get that show off the air because he legitimately thought it was hurting American politics. He had to stomp a couple people to make it happen, but it was important enough to warrant it in his mind. Based on Jon's statements, it doesn't sound like the hosts were doing a good job anyway. They could have had an adversarial debate show that was still honest …
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 02:47 AM
1

The younger people in the cities, sure. People out in the desert and anyone over 35? Sun protection all the time. Because that's when the cancer starts. Two in three Aussies get skin cancer by age 70, 90% of that is caused by sun exposure.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 05:15 PM
3

That ozone hole is a bitch. The first month I thought 'yeah, I'll get a tan, that'll be great'. No, all the tourists do that and wind up with their skin falling off. The Aussies roll shirts, hats, sunblock, and shades all the times, I imagine summers in New Zealand deserve similar.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 04:07 AM
15

The cancer bit's not worth it. Go to a sunny place like Australia and you'll see that everyone wears sun block and big hats all the time for a damn good reason. A tan isn't worth it.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 03:31 AM
16

I don't respect cheaters. I don't sleep with people I don't respect, or at least those in the negatives.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 09:44 PM
16

I don't want a girl that still hasn't broken up with her boyfriend. I would not bang a girl that I know is still in a relationship. I have a moral code that's worth more than a hookup.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 08:53 PM
1

Superstars are exempt from normal person rules. Some mid level bank VP with a couple million dollars to throw around is in nowhere near the class for sex appeal as the richest man in the world.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 08:31 PM
6

It doesn't matter how rich and powerful you are, a dude in his 60's isn't going to be pulling a 19 year old without paying big money.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 03:59 AM
-1

It's not a "little detail", it's your entire point. Truth is, you still have to put in the effort.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/14 02:53 AM
18

Following some basic social rules isn't breaking frame or making a stand, it's just having basic social skills. "I'm not gonna doing anything if I don't feel like doing it" is way overkill in tiny situations like this, just take the cake and be social rather than being a pariah. Then, for your birthday, order in a big healthy fruit platter.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 07:38 PM
36

Exactly right. Take a tiny piece you don't even need to touch, it's just a basic social custom to take part.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 03:54 PM

This is in an engineering building, not too many hard line academic feminists venture out this far.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:05 AM
9

The poster for that is right underneath this one! I'll definitely go to the event, fingers crossed no one pulls fire alarms and barricades the doors again.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 08:28 PM
2

You just described fraternity life at my school pretty much perfectly. Down to scotch and cigar nights.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 06:33 PM
1

21 years of soap use and no issues to report, there's nowhere for bacteria to live.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 09:50 PM
5

Compare the number of lives saved by vaccination instead.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 12:57 PM
5

Vaccinations protect your health and cause no pain. The "real and medical benefits" of circumscision don't apply in a first world country with thing like "soap" available. Medical complications from circumscision are potentially fatal.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 02:38 AM
6

I'd say surgery forced on infants penises without anesthetic is actually above those. It probably affects the most people of any of these issues. which doesn't adversely affect anyone It adversely affects millions of boys a year. Would you consider getting strapped down without consent and having part of your body cut off "adverse" if it happened to you today instead of when you were younger?
/r/MensRights14/08/14 01:51 AM
9

I think forcible genital surgery on babies with questionable medical benefits that is actually illegal in many parts of the world should actually be pretty high on the list.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 12:56 AM
8

What other mandatory cosmetic surgery do you support?
/r/MensRights14/08/14 12:09 AM
2

Again, if you're not regularly comparing dicks, then how does it affect you? Some people in my family are, some aren't, and it has 0 impact at all whether the rest of them are or aren't.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 06:37 AM
3

Except being a dwarf is something immediately noticeable every single day. How often are people looking at their families dicks?
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:25 AM
2

What conceivable impact does that have on you mentally? How would it affect you? And just think, a few years down the line there'd be plenty more like you in the family tree. Not that it matters unless you spend a lot of time naked with your family.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:24 AM
1

It's the fact they didn't have a choice that was wrong.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:22 AM
1

It's a brewery website, so they can only let people (who say they're) over 18 view it.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 04:00 AM
1

So was the UK, and Australia is about the same level as canada from what I've seen so far. This is certainly not a US only situation!
/r/TheRedPill29/06/14 10:04 PM
1

I don't live in the US either, and none of this sounds unreasonable for countries I've been in.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/14 05:42 AM
1

What does any of that have to do with the US?
/r/TheRedPill29/06/14 01:56 AM
21

'Increases significantly' is a very, very different thing from 'most likely going to be retarded in some way.'. Most likely would infer greater than 50%, which just isn't true.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 05:03 AM
1

There's a lot of other factors that go in to regret that are totally seperate from whether or no she actually thinks your attractive. Reactions from her parents, for example.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 01:49 AM
2

Yeah, in more rural/suburban areas, school is where you meet everyone.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 10:49 PM
1

Eh, I don't see any benefit and a lot of downsides. The only people I know at uni who came from "boys schools" are the awkward recluses who treat girls like foreign objects. I'm sure there's other situations around the world though.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 04:14 PM
0

I went to a co ed school with no drama, never fought for attention, wasn't a douchbag and had plenty of access to teenage girls all the time. That led to lots of relationships, social skills and hookups that just never would have happened otherwise. The addition of women does not automatically make school bad, if anything high school girls were the best part of being in high school.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 01:41 PM
10

That would have been the worst high school life ever as a kid growing up. I can't imagine trying to build up social skills and how to deal with girls from scratch after getting out of an all boys school into the real world.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 07:47 AM
2

Yeah, I've seen that not happen a lot though. Someone's parent dying, sibling dying in a car crash, and the girlfriends/wives helped them through it and are still together.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 08:32 AM
2

Yeah, it's the best thing for your genetic line but a horrible thing for actually being able to live life.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 01:20 AM
0

Or have kids young with beautiful women then settle down later with whomever you want.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/14 10:52 PM
3

Dating one of them is partly what got me here in the first place. The guys in those circles were generally pretty decent, the girls were fucking insane.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 01:48 AM
6

I'm thinking of the black-card carrying, taking daddys jet for the weekend kind of rich. Those girls are insane, at least in my experience.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 12:58 AM
7

Because women from the prestigious families are just as bad. Usually worse, they take entitlement to a whole new level. Have you ever dated a really rich girl?
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 12:29 AM
-1

Different people grow differently. Someone with good genetics, a good trainer, perfect diet and all the time in the world for the gym is going to get those gains in a fraction of the time compared to someone where lifting is a side pursuit.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/14 03:24 AM
1

Until someone famous walks in. Or someone even better looking that isn't in the public eye. There's always someone higher up the totem pole somewhere.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/14 10:36 PM
1

But really, when is that going to happen? 1/1000 times he goes out? It's not even worth worrying about, you're never going to be the best looking guy 100% of the time.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/14 10:30 PM
1

Could I hook up with them? Yes, and I do. But that cuts them out of the relationship pool because I just think it looks bad. And yes Ronnie Coleman does look like a child next to that guy, but neither of them will have any problems at all.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/14 10:17 PM
1

There's a point at which you're also too much taller than a girl. It just looks silly to be seen with a girl a foot shorter than you, and it makes sex less easy. I can't go out with short girls, though that isn't really a bad thing. A fit 6'2" is hardly going to be easily intimidated by a couple extra inches on another guy.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/14 09:40 PM
1

Diminishing returns, like I said.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/14 08:48 AM
1

He's 17, why would he care what 25 year old women care? His demographic (girls his age and younger) would beg on their knees for a chance to just see him.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/14 11:20 PM
1

It's not all great. I'm 6'5" and towering above pretty much every crowd is a little annoying. A couple inches shorter would be more handy, but I'm not complaining. It's just diminishing returns, there's no new benefits to being 6'5" over 6'2.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/14 10:38 PM
1

He gets propositioned by more girls in a night than you'll ever have in your life.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/14 09:55 PM
-1

Maybe you're not somebody who should be procreating! I wouldn't wish anyone those genes.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/14 09:51 PM
0

"No bikinis" would also be appropriate for school. I'm just saying this dress code is too restrictive in an environment where it really doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 04:19 AM
0

Tons of offices in my industry seem to have a dress code of shorts, occasionally shoes, and whatever shirt you feel like. Even in finance jobs from my time in Sydney, business casual included shorts and flip flops.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 12:40 AM
0

Not everyone works in an office with dress codes.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 11:02 PM
1

This report is hardly evidence. A single set of pictures was used from only two models tested on a very small population. There are too many uncontrolled factors to draw any conclusions.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 10:44 AM
1

I don't need to repeat the experiments because the level of success is very high. If it was higher it wouldn't really make a difference.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 10:37 AM
4

Because putting on a fake face doesn't make some people happy. Being congruent with your actual state of mind is more important than putting on some fake attractive face. Being happy has certainly not hurt my game in the least.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 11:22 PM
-2

Sadly that doesn't help with the jail time or the news stories.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/14 10:18 AM
1

I graduated high school three years ago, mine was NOT this slutty. It was a pretty small school so every time anyone lost there virginity or hooked up with someone new, it was big news that got around fast. Maybe because of that reason, but most people had one or two partners by 16, the real sluts had 10 by the time they graduated.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/14 10:18 AM
-2

Sadly, it would still be rape. Even if you have a recording, if it was recorded illegally it cannot be considered as evidence and the jurors can't hear it.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/14 10:06 AM
0

For an actual LRT I like someone with a successfull career of their own, and ambition to do something besides sit around a look pretty. If the girl is just hot but not motivated or successful then that's just a plate to me. A PhD and what she does with it is a huge indicator of quality.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 02:28 PM
1

Am I allowed to complain about "kids these days" yet, as a 21 year old?
/r/MensRights07/04/14 02:47 AM
1

Been to Amsterdam? €50 is the going price for pretty much any girl you want, so around $75.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 01:44 AM
3

Sounds like most everywhere I've lived, in 4 countries so far, and this is the first I've ever heard of it.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 10:28 AM
3

sack tapping TIL this is a thing? Where do you live that this actually happens?
/r/MensRights06/04/14 10:09 AM
12

no benefits in a modern world with actual hygiene Studies about HIV transmission in Africa don't really fall under this category. We're talking about the US/Europe/Developed world, it says that right in this article at the bottom in 'Considerations for the United States'. Did you read your own article? Here's some more sources for you: Recommendation: Circumcision of newborns should not be routinely performed. From the NHS, there are much more effective and less invasive ways of preventing these…
/r/MensRights04/04/14 01:59 AM
10

That's what we like to call equality.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 11:53 PM
18

No, it poses a lot of potential risks, no benefits in a modern world with actual hygiene, and is incredibly painful for the child. It's a cosmetic and religious procedure, that's all.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 11:46 PM
0

Internships. Start a business. Get scholarships. I paid for my own STEM degree from the most expensive engineering school in the country without a cent from my parents, and made a lot of profit over those 4 years. I'm 21. Edit: Who, on TRP, is downvotting a suggestion to take responsibility for your own finances and stay out of debt?
/r/TheRedPill24/03/14 09:41 AM
3

Uh, lots of guys do. I'm 6'5", I don't go out with short girls regardless of what they look like. I love long legs, and being compatible heights makes sex more fun. Plus, a huge size difference looks silly. Are you short by any chance? I wonder if this is just a tall person problem.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/14 09:04 AM
1

The bags been xrayed, so I sure as hell don't care about helping someone else lift it. You can buy in to the fear and let it control your actions, or you can roll with the security theatre and keep treating people like people. I go with the latter.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 10:29 PM
3

You're a little crazy. If someone (regardless of gender) is struggling I help them. There's cameras everywhere to see I didn't come in with them, and I don't live in fear that some bag is going to implicate me in terrorism. You have some anxiety issues.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 01:56 PM
3

Partially because society demonizes men who work with children as potential/likely pedophiles.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 12:41 PM
8

Yeah, like driving, working in a factory, operating a drone, running a computer, etc etc. War is vastly less physical than it was in the past, there's no reason women can't do many jobs just as well.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 10:34 AM
1

Those little metal trays have left permanent burn marks on my hands.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 03:58 PM
10

It's cutting off a body part from a newborn for no medical reason, posing health risks in the process. That's the barbarian part. We don't cut off any other parts of babies, why this one?
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:16 PM
10

I'm circumcised, I'm happy I'm circumcised. And I'm going to have my kids circumcised, that's that. Why? Why not give them the choice?
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:15 PM
9

Yeah, the mother's contacting you for money. That is the sole reason. Any other excuse is a lie, and I think you know it. Bullshit. A family member of mine was adopted and at 15-20 went on a crusade to find her real parents. Kids want to know who their parents are, it isn't just a ruse to get money.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 09:08 AM
9

But if you got arrested they would seize your assets, take your property and savings and pay her anyway with your money while you're in jail.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 09:20 AM
3

Except his own music.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 04:27 PM
4

It is definitely the job of upper management to make sure that middle management is the right size and is actually doing its job. Middle management should be as small as possible, but a lot of places, especially big old companies, get very very fat in the middle.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 08:49 PM
3

Middle management does do that in any well run company. If yours don't then they aren't maximizing their potential. I've worked for a couple big companies that do that very well, and cutting out any part of the pyramid would collapse the rest of it. It's something I never understood until I moved up the management change, I guess I thought so much of the work just magically happened that I didn't know anyone actually had to do it.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 08:22 PM
3

Some middle management could be, definitely not all. There are payroll, conflict resolution and hiring/firing that can't be done by the employees themselves.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 08:20 PM
9

No, I manage middle management. Are you saying those things aren't important? Planning routes, managing pay, hiring people, making schedules and teams, none of that is important? We give middle management goals and objectives (in a case like this, pick up the cities trash under these contracted levels of service). Middle management hires the crews, plans the routes, makes the schedules, manages their pay, tracks their performance, deals with issues and public relations, etc. The front line worke…
/r/MensRights13/05/13 07:23 PM
9

Actually the world does. Middle managers are the ones who make sure those garbage men actually get to your house and pick up your trash. Garbage men with no plan, no one to order their equipment, and no one to make sure they get paid aren't going to clean anything up.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 06:57 PM
3

I don't work in IT, but that is completely different than any office experience I've ever had. There is some very light flirting from either side, but for 99% of the time everyone is just professional at work and no issues are raised by anyone.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 03:30 PM
1

Not sure about other provinces, but BC and Saskatchewan socialized car insurance as well. You have one single government supplier for liability coverage. They still charge men and women different rates.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 01:43 PM
4

Both are insurance for a risk that differs statistically based on gender. What's not comparable?
/r/MensRights17/03/13 04:28 AM
2

Good ol double standards. If it harms women, it's descrimination. If it harms men, it's statistics.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 07:45 PM
1

Parts of it are awesome, I split my time between the two provinces a lot. If you have to be in a city, Calgary is at least within sight of the mountains, but living in a town like Canmore, the Crowsnest Pass, or other places in the mountains are definitely the nicest places to be.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 06:44 PM
9

Healthcare premiums in Canada are gender neutral as well, although some provinces do also forbid discrimination on car insurance. You're right, I just want to see a consistent standard applied to both genders.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 06:23 PM
2

Go to Alberta! They can't descriminate based on age or gender for car insurance, only on years of driving history. I got the same rate as a male at 16 as a woman at 25 would have gotten if it was her first car under her name. My insurance, under my own name, was only $150 a month for a V8 muscle car.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 05:59 PM
42

In the US, the affordable care act made it illegal to charge men and women different rates for health insurance, even though all the math points to women consuming significantly more healthcare resources than men. When those provisions hit this year, mens rates will rise and womens will drop. Why is it OK to disciminate against men in auto insurance, but descriminating against women for health insurance is illegal?
/r/MensRights16/03/13 05:57 PM
2

Unlike the university of Toronto gyms and pools, which have tons of women's only hours throughout the week, and no men's only hours.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 04:16 AM
1

But it's not explicitly about age anymore. Increasingly people in cities are getting licenses later or not at all, so it works out to benefit younger drivers. My premiums were half what my brother payed before this change in law came into effect.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 04:02 AM
7

Alberta, Canada. We have pretty damn affordable private insurance. I was paying less than $150 a month for a V8 2 door from the 70's when I got my license at 16 a couple years ago.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 05:42 PM
9

Age discrimination for car insurance in my province is illegal. It's based on the number of years insured. Whether you get your first car at 16 or 26, you pay the same rates. And no gender discrimination either.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 04:11 PM
5

Age of consent is 16.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 01:30 PM
1

But since most insurance companies stopped covering it as an unnecessary procedure, prevalence plummeted.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 03:38 PM
11

Hmm, girls are always happy about the uncut state of my penis, and I've stories from them of some very screwed up circumcisions. Even in the US, the in the current generation of kids, circumcised kids are the odd ones out as most parents are rejecting the idea.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 02:39 PM
1

Many states have thrown all those out, and only use no-fault divorce now.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 01:13 AM
1

Someone had the audacity to try and start a Conservative Party Club on the U of T campus. It got protested as a hate group.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 03:32 PM
2

That is serious hate being shown by those vandals. I have not seen any in the engineering area get torn down.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 11:27 PM
1

Toronto.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 10:47 PM
1

Here's another poster from earlier in the year: The invisibility of male issues. http://i.imgur.com/KVfqS.jpg
/r/MensRights03/11/12 09:42 PM
-1

Ah yes, still playing kings and castles up there, eh?
/r/MensRights28/05/12 03:06 PM
3

He called his son in law a dingbat every time he walked in the door. I have no idea what she's on about.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 01:10 PM
15

If they were both to drunk to be making decisions, and neither of them could consent, how is he guilty of rape? You have no idea who initiated what.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 04:17 PM
0

It looks like he also had a change of heart about wanting to give her a ride as well.
/r/MensRights15/06/11 11:26 PM
4

But you still use the cover to identify the book.
/r/MensRights28/05/11 06:08 PM
3

But what part of all of that wouldn't have been exactly as possible without having the surgery? I don't think it really causes the harm some people claim, but the problem is that there is no benefit and a lot of pain/risk of complications, even if you don't remember it.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 05:01 AM
1

You have boring suits. People at my workplace have all kinds of light tan, white, yellow, etc suits.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 03:59 AM
13

There's a difference between entitlement and equality. Giving someone preference based on gender, race, religion, etc is pure, textbook discrimination.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 02:10 AM
1

The law was changed in my province on auto insurance a while back. Everyone, regardless of age or gender, has there rates set by their years of experience, training, and driving record. You can be a 25 year old woman who just got a license, or a 16 year old boy (as I was), and pay the same insurance if you both got your license in the same year. I paid a third of what guys my age were just across the border in a province without regulation. If you screw up and crash/get a ticket, your rates are …
/r/MensRights21/01/11 03:58 AM
2

It's reinforcing the fear of men in women traveling alone. On the TTC buses and subways, this notice is under "passenger safety" and clearly says women and female passengers. This is hurtful as a male passenger that I am being viewed as a potential aggressor simply by being in public to the extent where women need separate stops just to feel safe.
/r/MensRights05/01/11 04:47 PM
2

That way there's no adult forcing them or manipulating them. Myself in grade nine still held adults in pretty high authority compared to my peers.
/r/MensRights27/12/10 03:17 AM
2

Yes, that sounds about right, 16 sounds like a good age of consent. 19 and 15 gets into the area where there may be the exploitation or non-understanding of risks that these laws are designed to address. Think of yourself at 19, wouldn't having sex with someone in grade 9 seem a little sick to you?
/r/MensRights26/12/10 08:58 PM
1

I think Canada does it right. 16 is the general age of consent, but there is a 2 year age allowance in the 14-18 range where it is legal. So, an 18 year old and his 16 year old girlfriend is legal, and 14-15 year olds experimenting is legal.
/r/MensRights26/12/10 05:29 PM
3

Luckily that is a small minority. Lot's of illnesses can disqualify you from service.
/r/MensRights15/12/10 11:12 PM
0

More uncited stats, anyways.
/r/MensRights15/12/10 11:10 PM
16

From their posts, they don't look like supremacists. It's white rights, not white supremacy, like how this is mens rights, not male superiority. Still, I don't see why we are listed as related.
/r/MensRights28/11/10 06:02 AM
1

35% tax? Damn, I pay less than that in a high bracket, and at least that covers my healthcare.
/r/MensRights29/10/10 04:01 AM
1

In some small town, I assume. $1200/month would get a decent one bedroom apartment in my city, or a run down two bedroom.
/r/MensRights14/10/10 10:57 PM
1

Why, if you don't mind me asking.
/r/MensRights20/09/10 08:46 PM
1

All of the schedules and information are on the athletics center web site. If I don't get an answer back from them that I am happy with, I can publish all of it.
/r/MensRights19/09/10 07:54 PM
1

I lack appreciation of the snide part of your comment, not the helpful correction. I fail to see any irony in my last comment, only you continuing to be rude.
/r/MensRights19/09/10 01:23 AM

You found a way to make helpful advice rude. I deeply apologize. I'll be far more vigilant in regard to the correctness of my informal online postings from an anonymous account where misspellings mean nothing. I'm asking for advice on a matter related to the subreddit. If any errors exist in the letter please let me know, but picking apart informal comments and leaving snide remarks does not help.
/r/MensRights19/09/10 12:59 AM

Very good points. the poster bias just stuck out to me because their was a large section in that Task Force of Equity report which the addressee co-wrote complaining about the depiction of male athletes. As it is not the main issue I am trying to address, it is a distraction from the point of the letter. I'll take that out of the final copy I send.
/r/MensRights18/09/10 09:04 PM

True, the other issues would likely not be under her control. The poster images don't effect me, the scheduling does. I'll take that part out of the final letter.
/r/MensRights18/09/10 09:01 PM

The rallying against the brochures was actually from a chapter in the 'Task Force on Gender Equity" document calling for equality in public portrayal. It discussed in great detail how depictions of athletes around the facility were mostly male, and requested change. It seems that the result has been to change every single picture to women. I should make that clear, although the woman this letter is two actually co-wrote that document. I am also not rallying against Women's only groups. I rally a…
/r/MensRights18/09/10 06:20 PM
1

Why, then, was it ok to have a woman sit next to an unaccompanied child? If men cannot, then the same law must apply to women. There are female child molesters as well. Supporting this policy only against males is textbook sexual discrimination.
/r/MensRights25/06/10 03:46 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter