TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kratistos Archive

View 4 posts and 129 comments by kratistos on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

"/u/kratistos found to be a handsome young man, finds study of 2 grandma's" has pretty much the same merit.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 02:30 PM
1

It's very late and I have trouble expressing myself clearly - sorry for that. Yes, the anger is there and it's justified. If we weren't angry, we wouldn't be here - I just want to talk about how we can channel that anger/sadness/disappointment to improve our situation or to raise awareness.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 12:34 AM
0

Men get things when people are scared of them and want to placate them. You see, I think exactly this attitude costs us a lot of support. I like to think another way is possible: In my university, we have a program in which you help disadvantaged, under developed, psychological damaged kids (I study psych). There are only limited places in there and we are roughly 2/3 women and 1/3 men. I convinced my (female, almost cliché feminist) professor to put a quota in for men of 50%. By talking about h…
/r/MensRights01/06/13 12:30 AM
0

Besides the MRA thing, I actually enjoyed the article. I think we all should not be too angry for this. Anger doesn't help much. One important thing to remember is that the author did not say "MRAs are racist women-haters in the closet" he said: "People who state they're MRAs in their online dating profile are racist women-haters in the closet". This is still something I heavily disagree with, but a huge difference. For example: I don't dislike Christians in any way. It seems a tad strange to me…
/r/MensRights01/06/13 12:11 AM
1

Does it matter if the writer is a man or a woman?
/r/MensRights31/05/13 11:58 PM
2

The fact that he has a different (and possibly simply misinformed) opinion on an issue does not make him an asshole.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 11:57 PM
5

At least the online LGBT crowd changed a while back into LgbT - hence the frequent clashes between /r/gaybros and /r/gaymers with /r/lgbt.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 11:55 PM
2

I really don't care which one is "better" and am certain that both have their perks. To me, it's about having a choice.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 05:41 PM
-3

Please don't do this. It's really annoying and doesn't help our cause at all. And yes, it would be just as annoying if you'd have written it sounds like the people there are typical rightists: desperate to censor any opinion that does not conform to dogma.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 01:46 PM
3

So the lgbt's think r/mr is against them? Not really. /r/gaymers, /r/ainbow, /r/gaybros and many other lgbt subreddits are Mensright's supportive or neutral. /r/lgbt focuses heavily on the t part and is filled with crazy mods.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 01:44 PM
3

I like your analysis. I'd like to add that women like porn, too. The whole issue is constantly discussed from the different feminist perspectives. Some, especially older, feminist nut jobs have an attitude that is very similar to Germany's leading feminist Alice Schwarzer: Porn is the theory, rape the praxis. Yep. They actually believe that.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 12:34 PM
2

You and everyone else, no matter which gender.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 12:01 PM
9

If men werent such slaves to their sex drive Why is this upvoted? It's pretty sexist against men. I for myself am not a slave to my sex drive - or at least not more than the girls I know. Edit: It isn't anymore.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 11:01 AM
3

power of the woman to control the man by withholding sex. WTF.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 02:16 PM
12

So, we just dislike everyone who's liked by SRS and like everyone who's disliked by them? That's retarded.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 10:54 AM
0

I'm an European Social Democrat, which probably would be ultra liberal in America. I think this post is bull shit. We all know that. According to the surveys, the majority of /mensrights is liberal. There will always be idiots from all kinds of political sides who try to fight their ideological battles here - downvote and carry on. And please don't start threads like this.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 10:08 AM
2

This is a national issue of the US (and I don't know shit about it, since I'm not American, so I'm not going to argue on the pro's and con's of affirmative action). Men's rights is a way more international one. Edit: But in colleges/areas where whites are a minority, white's center may be reasonable. Again: Not American.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:16 PM
1

The problem with this analogy is, that whites are very rarely disadvantaged because of their skin color. A white's center could talk about how much they suck at dancing and how they can't handle spicy food, but that's pretty much it. Men, on the other side, have a lot of disadvantages because of their gender. Circumcision, work place deaths, traditional gender roles, etc, etc.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 02:09 PM
12

Well, there's no case of men sexually harassing children on airplanes exactly because they prohibit men from sitting next to unaccompanied minors, you silly man. /s Seriously, that doesn't even make me angry. It makes me sad.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 11:47 AM
1

I like emancipated. Those women are emancipated from traditional gender rolls as well as from dogmatic feminism.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 08:24 PM
1

If it's so important to you, it's certainly more important than your hair cut.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 08:32 AM
10

The people who want to be heard are usually those that speak. A very eloquent and polite synonym for "vocal minority", which sounds too condescending. Cool.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 11:56 PM
10

Conversations like this. Mostly very pleasant, sometimes you get the occasional troll, though. And a couple of days ago someone made a "there are liberal MRAs, too" thread, which also made it seem like they're a minority. Edit: Or is it "why do you have issues with this poll?". Sorry then. In the original thread was some criticism I agree with.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 10:47 PM
26

I still have some issues with this poll. But it surprises me really how liberal this subreddit is - always thought this was somewhat of a conservative stronghold.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 10:29 PM
16

That was kind of weird. "MRA invades us! They upvote each other, this is why every MRA is always upvoted here." - "Hi, I'm a MRA. There's no invasion. We also don't get upvoted." - "Yes, yöü dö! Bäm, -20 vötes". Kinda didn't prove their point. :-/
/r/MensRights08/08/12 10:28 PM
9

They also grow up in generally poorer families, etc. The "anti-feminism" of some MRAs sadly turns in a general distrust in anything that's perceived as "politically correct".
/r/MensRights08/08/12 05:08 PM
-9

There are exceptions of course (My kids won't have it as easy as Barack Obama's), but in general I'm pretty glad I'm white.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 03:09 PM
-8

I'm a MRA yet I think white people are privileged in the Western World. Is that so crazy?
/r/MensRights08/08/12 02:39 PM
3

You're absolutely right. Sadly, admitting any male advantages in this subreddit will get you downvoted - while we complain that feminism does exactly the same.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 09:20 AM
1

I also find it hard to believe any could operate a sex slave brothel in any reasonable nation without being reported to the police. As someone who's been living in Berlin for two years now: hahahahahahaha. You got to be kidding me. Edit: Sex trafficking is btw not a female only crime. There are many Romani boys here out on the streets.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 11:56 AM
29

Any strategy which is designed to eliminate rejection or overcome someone's reluctance or indecision or non-participation or which reduces the other person's options is a strategy of sexual assault TIL my girlfriend and I live in a mutually raping relationship. That's kinda scary.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 12:42 AM
4

In theory, theory and praxis are the same. In praxis not.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 10:51 PM
5

I .. didn't suggest that. I suggested that the joke is same kind of joke that people use who think that, etc.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 03:03 PM
9

That's just stupid. It's a joke for the same narrow minded people who think that engineering and medicine are the only truly useful subjects, while Psych, History, Philosophy etc are "useless".
/r/MensRights06/08/12 01:58 PM
1

Sorry man, but this is a bad poll. I know you put a lot of work in it, but still: Some people don't define themselves with two genders I either have no problem with feminism or I think feminism by large is hypocritical and demonizes men? What about middle ground?
/r/MensRights06/08/12 09:50 AM
1

Which is what being traditional in America really is about. I like that about your country. Personal freedom as a tradition - you don't have that in many other places. Good on you, Uncle Sam. Good on you.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 01:05 PM
2

Do we really? Both the girlfriend and I work, we both cook, we both clean. Yet I'm undoubtly manly.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 12:36 PM
2

Well, that happens within the MR movement sometimes, too. Some anti traditional gender roles guys think of traditionalists as dinosaurs, some traditionalists think of the more liberal MRAs as degenerate sissies.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 12:33 PM
0

Can we please stop downvoting the people who criticize the Daily Mail? It really is a bad, often misrepresenting newspaper. So please, take everything you read from them with a even bigger grain of salt than usual. To the topic: The posters really suck. Why is it "Don't leave yourself more vulnerable to forceful sex or even rape"? Where the difference, exactly? And why is it only women and only rape? Is alcohol only dangerous if you're a woman and is the only danger seriously getting raped? What…
/r/MensRights05/08/12 11:51 AM
6

I lurked /r/feminism, they complained about /r/mensrights, I came here to check it out.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 08:18 AM
3

Are you a pedophile? Yes No Not sure. Do you hate women? Yes No Not sure And, more serious, Which of the following statements are you most likely to agree with? Men and Women are more or less equally disadvantaged Men are more disadvantaged than women Women are more disadvantaged than Men Only men are disadvantaged Only women are disadvantaged Edit: Political stand? No idea about good questions
/r/MensRights02/08/12 11:43 PM
1

Good idea, but not very well phrased. Maybe: With whom do you discuss mensrights: Partner Family Some friends Most friends More
/r/MensRights02/08/12 11:39 PM
1

I actually think the article is pretty decent. Certainly not a "media campaign against men". “In the last 100 years the IQ scores of both men and women have risen but women’s have risen faster,” said Flynn. “This is a consequence of modernity. The complexity of the modern world is making our brains adapt and raising our IQ.” He adds that the “improvement is more marked for women than for men because they were disadvantaged in the past.” This is perfectly okay and absolutely true. I really don't …
/r/MensRights23/07/12 12:10 AM
3

. There are twice as many men with an IQ of 120-plus as there are women, there are 30 times the number of men with an IQ of 170-plus as there are women. Maybe because feminism is a bigger thing than "masculism"?
/r/MensRights23/07/12 12:02 AM
1

I neither own a rifle nor a Porsche, yet I have a tiny dick. Checkmate, atheists.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 02:37 PM
2

I agree. Not every jealousy is misandry.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 02:28 PM
27

That's some dystopian shit, man.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 02:22 PM
6

I also found this to be very weird.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 02:17 PM
0

MRAs don't want to abridge women's rights, they just want their own. Nobody wants to control women's bodies and decisions, we just don't want to be at women's mercy when it comes to ours. I'm certain the majority of /r/feminism would absolutely agree with following statement, though: Feminism doesn't want to abridge men's rights, they just want their own. Nobody wants to control men's bodies and decisions, we just don't want to be at men's mercy when it comes to ours. And we shouldn't fall in to…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 09:38 PM
0

No true scotsman? There are enough people out there who label MRAs as "rape apologists" or "protectors of the patriarchy" and claim that everybody who is neither can't be a "real" MRA but is "misguided". I label myself a feminist and I'm as much a feminist (and part of the movement/ideology) as the SRS-cunts, even though you and SRS will disagree on this.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 09:33 PM
-1

Feminists (...) think women need special consideration and treatment from the state. Some do. Some don't. It's a diverse movement.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 05:00 PM
0

Feminism is a hate movement, pure and simple. So, this is absolutely okay and upvoted, but if we're called a hate movement we start to flip tables? Some feminists are cunts (Hi there, SRS!), most aren't. Some MRAs are dicks, most aren't.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 04:59 PM
-2

feminists insist that it is only women that are disadvantaged in our society Some do, some don't. It's a diverse movement.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 04:56 PM
2

Guys. The article linked by OP is not very helpful. If you can read German or use google translate, I recommend the original. A little summary: The harder-to-get-into parking spaces are two out of more than 220 They're designed for people who like the "challenge" of it It's a satire on the actual existing "women only" parking spaces in Germany (usually with more light, closer to the exit, as protection) The mayor who designed those stated it's a joke He does it as marketing gag for his little to…
/r/MensRights11/07/12 01:03 PM
4

Wrong, we're totally Israel's bitch.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 10:24 PM
9

I disagree with you there. In any group, there's a loud yelling subgroup of people who think they're doing it better than the others. We have them, feminism has them, atheism has them. It's just how it is. Try to focus on the quieter, more reasonable members.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 11:26 AM
15

Would you also tell her that on the internet, people know you as GREATBIGDICK? :-)
/r/MensRights06/07/12 12:12 AM
4

The very beautiful answers in this thread amaze me. Thank you, guys. I linked this to /2x and hope some of the daughters over there and can appreciate this thread as much as I do.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 12:04 AM
1

http://www.dict.cc/englisch-deutsch/text+apprehension.html I'll just blame it on this dictionary. From the German wikipedia : Kindeswohl . Die Gefährdung des Kindeswohls dient der Rechtsprechung als Maßstab für einen Eingriff in das Erziehungsrecht der Sorgeberechtigten. Diese Gefährdung als unbestimmter Rechtsbegriff bedarf der Auslegung durch die Rechtsprechung. Im Kern geht es um die erhebliche seelische oder körperliche Gefährdung eines Kindes oder Jugendlichen it talks very cleary about the…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 05:57 PM
2

How dare you to say that! Seriously people, why is this bloke downvoted? Let's stop the whole "I disagree, thus I downvote" shit.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 12:26 PM
0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apprehension_(understanding) Today you learned. Though, I'll give you that, comprehension is probably the better word here. My English is far from perfect. But that's not what that was about, it's about you misunderstanding written sentences in both languages.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 10:54 AM
1

Text apprehension is apparently not your strong side. First the discussion about the "more forward thinking"-thing, now about this. To make the difference perfectly clear for you: In the US you can argue that the wealth and social status of a family member is better for the child, thus rich people have an advantage. It's not like this in Germany, where you'd have to proof that staying with a family member doesn't only give the child a disadvantage but also the well-being is endangered.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 10:35 AM
3

Yeah, the law is with you on this. You get punished, but the state doesn't take your children away. Thankfully.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 11:51 PM
4

I just did. :D My girlfriend came in and complained that I woke her up with my laughter (Here, it's 1:30 am). Holy crap. Suspicion always equals proof, most men are described as at least dangerous and every single one there seems to be über-neurotic and just nuts. My favorite thread so far is "That guy I kinda like goes to Thailand for vacation. Is it possible that he's not there for sex?" and everyone assures her that there's no other possibility. No scuba-diving, no mountain-climbing, not the …
/r/MensRights04/07/12 11:38 PM
-1

You misunderstand that. It's not about what's best for the child (as it is in the US, I believe) but about the general well-being of it - to make sure it's not endangered by any means.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 11:19 PM
8

There are valid reasons to keep a kid away from a parent. Being abusive is one, in Germany. Being a criminal is not.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 11:13 PM
3

I'm sorry. We still love you. downvotes
/r/MensRights04/07/12 05:08 PM
1

To be fair: Those quotes are not quotes about men, but about MRA's. And while I certainly do not like being called a wife-beating, racist homophobic; it's not sexist of them to do so. It's just sad, hateful and ignorant.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 04:50 PM
6

Nice one.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 03:09 PM
16

The not-fat chic has fucking brass knuckles. She can be really, really glad that the dude didn't break every single one of her fingers. Both girls can be glad the black guy didn't even really hit them, but did more of a shoving.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 05:21 PM
4

I'd love to see a smart person's view on this.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 01:11 PM
1

We should send a letter to the kids and explain the situation to them. Maybe someone who was/is in a similar situation to "Deadbeat" dad? They have to know that he loves them and that he wants to care for them, but that it's just utterly impossible and that the world is not black and white.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 01:05 PM
1

That's just not true, dude. Down Syndrome, for example, is likely going to be extinct in a couple of generations, since it's possible to test it early on in the pregnancy, which usually leads to an abortion. Anyway, cultural evolution (memes instead of genes) is much, much more important for humanity.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 01:01 PM
17

100% agreed. With all due respect, thinking that all women are man-haters is just crazy talk. OP needs professional help, that shit is pathological and not a "side effect of the red pill".
/r/MensRights02/07/12 12:46 PM
17

Actually there are some intelligent, calm, understanding people on both "sides" of the issue. Nutjobs, too, though.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 12:42 PM
3

No offense, man, but I was really surprised do read something that thought-out from someone with your username.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 12:20 PM
6

No, you're wrong. The German law system is not as federal as the American. This was ruled after federal law. A higher juristic council (like the Oberamtsgericht, the Bundesgericht or the Verfassungsgericht) could overrule but that's very unlikely. So, the ban applies everywhere in Germany.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 12:03 PM
-1

you demonstrate ignorance by referring to the foreskin as simply just "pre-skin" Only linguistic ignorance, buddy. I'm German and thought that's the right translation of Vorhaut. Apparently it isn't. Chill out - that's only a minor disagreement. Stay civil, don't downvote because you disagree, don't call anyone ignorant. You wouldn't discuss like this face-to-face, so don't do it here. Back to the clit. Comparing clitoris and fore-skin doesn't really work out. Clitoris and glans are homologous; …
/r/MensRights27/06/12 03:16 PM
-3

Man, we really need a novelty account that explains again and again the difference between male and female circumcision. Is male circumcision painful, idiotic, unnecessary, archaic and should be ruled out, like in Germany? Hell, yes. Is it pretty much the same as female circumcision? No. Cutting of a clitoris and sewing the vaginal entrance together is - and we should accept that, even though male circumcision is taken way to lightly - a whole different level of fucked-up-ness than cutting of th…
/r/MensRights27/06/12 02:46 PM
2

You need valid medical reasons. It would be really hard to just "convince" a doctor to do it anyway, because health insurances pay for medical, but nor religious or cosmetical circumcisions. So the doctor could be actually sued for fraud or malpractice. All glory the German health care system.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 11:53 AM
5

You could write emails or whatever to leading newspapers, like Der Spiegel. Surprisingly, even the Zentralrat der Juden (The biggest Jewish organization in Germany, which - due to our history, of course - has a over proportional influence) didn't use the word anti-semitic. Usually, they're pretty quick to do that. So right now, it's all good. But let's give it another week or two.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 11:51 AM
0

I'm sorry for your sad childhood.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 02:46 PM
7

I think you have a very good point. With /MensRights getting bigger, there's the danger that we go the same road as /atheism, which is now much more about Facebookfriends, funny comics and inspirational quotes than about discussions or support.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 01:18 PM
3

I disagree. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/trfwd/feminist_dismisses_misandry_as_just_victimenvy/c4p3dnr
/r/MensRights17/05/12 03:56 PM
-3

This is the best analysis of the text I've read here. Noting this is way more important than the usual "feminists suck" circle jerk.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 03:55 PM
5

It's funny how the post right below this one is complaining about how people bitch about sexist jokes.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 06:27 AM
2

Not all clubs are like this. Go to another, if yours is like that.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 01:36 AM
0

I said that's her point, dude. Living in the Ukraine sucks for both genders, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 04:48 PM
-1

But dude: That's exactly her point - as a women in Ukraine you only get power/money by whoring yourself out.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 12:48 PM
2

This is a bad concept. The world cup 1978 in Argentina, the 1936 Olympics in my country: Those were used as propaganda and to improve the bad pictures of the dictatorships of those countries. I'm very proud that the Captain of the German national team, Lahm, spoke out against the human right violations in the Ukraine (which had, just like your links, nothing to do with prostitution but with Yulia Tymoshenko). It really is the right thing to do.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 12:46 PM
6

All the big football event trafficking claims are hoaxes Nope. I live in Berlin in a somewhat bad neighborhood. 2006, when the World Cup was in Germany, the streets where flooded with Eastern European prostitutes. Prostitution in Germany is legal, but nobody denies that sex traffic is real and a problem.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 12:42 PM
10

Let me try to explain: Europe has a sex slavery problem. Many young women come from Belarus, the baltic States or the Ukraine to Germany and other rich countries with the promise to work as cleaning ladies, manufacturers, etcetera with the help of human traffickers. Instead of this, they get systematically raped and are forced into prostitution. This problem is very real and not a feminist invention. Ukraine is a corrupt country where the organized crime is the real power, censorship is normal a…
/r/MensRights13/05/12 12:38 PM
1

that's her point, dude. "You only notice those issues when I show my tits". She's right and it's a problem.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 12:25 PM
2

Relevant xkcd It's not just that being divorced makes you depressed, being depressed also can get you divorced.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 11:32 PM
1

If my gf would be pregnant I also would be overjoyed, but I don't see abortions as child killing.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 02:39 PM
1

It seems we have different interpretations of OP's post. From what I gathered he isn't against abortion per se, but angry that his SO decided to get one without consulting him. Judging from his response, I understand her. In a perfect world they would have discussed this alone, of course. But even in a perfect world, it's still her decision, not his. If you see abortion in general as child murder, it's of course a different thing. Than, yes: She's going to do something that is unacceptable in yo…
/r/MensRights07/05/12 02:09 PM
2

Your angry reaction really speaks for itself. She was afraid of exactly this reaction and didn't tell you because of this. Yes, she should have talked with you about it, but seeing how your reaction is not "Hey, now I'm sad because she doesn't trust me enough to talk those important things through with me" but "I'm angry at her." I understand her. In the end it's her body and her decision. You have to accept that. This was not an easy decision for her. Go and support her instead of making it eve…
/r/MensRights07/05/12 01:57 PM
9

This is really good news. But I'm not gonna lie: The idea of a needle in my vas deferens scares the shit out of me.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 01:47 PM
2

I really appreciate it. But I disagree with you on this: the true principle and ideal of feminism, You see this as the true ideal of feminism, and so do I. But there are also thousands who have a very different idea about the ideal of feminism. There is no "true" feminism. In the end, it's just a word, that means different things to different people, often abused and because of this often a red flag to others. A lot like socialism, patriotism, christianity and so on. IMO both MRA and feminism ha…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 06:48 PM
1

What exactly is the question? I tried to say: Some people are sore losers because they have been victims of circumstances. I completely understand how you can grow suspicious of women after one broke your heart, your wallet and your pride. Some people never recover from that. We can only pity them and try to help. But there are also some (both in atheism, the pirate party and mensrights, the "movements" I'm somewhat part of), who are bitter, hateful and stupid without the excuse of horrible stuf…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:53 PM
4

Feminism, as an ideology, is based on the non-falsifiable premise that we live in a patriarchal society that oppresses women at every level There certainly is a history of patriarchal parts in our society. The rich and powerful (= the elite) are in nearly all cultures mostly men. Only in the last decades we developed to the point where women have a fair shot at presidency, while still being under represented in the political and economical level. This of course doesn't justify the talk about "op…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:27 PM
1

Well, of course. But not every loser is a victim. Some are just cunts.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 03:55 PM
16

If you want something to be presented as a fact, you should use logic and evidence to show it's a fact. What you wrote sounds a lot like "Gut feeling". I'm tired of the whole holier than though attitude in many movements. Not all feminists are matriachic, emotional, illogical girls (while some certainly are) and not all MRAs are sexist, frustrated losers (while some certainly are).
/r/MensRights02/05/12 03:42 PM
13

I disagree. Not everything that shows "cultish" signs is a religious cult. We aren't much different.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 03:07 PM
13

There's a reason they call themselves a fempire.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 03:05 PM
0

If you start fucking your boss, that's still okay. As long as he isn't a dick about... But the guy OP mentioned sounds like one, so let's hope the women aren't stupid enough to fuck him.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 08:53 PM
-1

In my opinion: You guys are all adults. If he wants to shag up with a student, that's fine in my book; as long as he doesn't harass anyone. And as long as he grades everyone fairly. If he doesn't, you have a problem.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 08:14 PM
1

Why do we assume that's true? We could just go over to /feminism and ask them.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 07:56 PM
-1

Very important point: Don't become bitter. The system is broken, yes. But that doesn't mean that women are evil or that you'll never find love and happiness again.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 12:02 PM
5

Is it really, though? In my experience, it isn't.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 11:04 PM
4

However a man's support is not her choice. It's his choice to make. No that easy. Fathers shouldn't be able to just refuse child support. It exists for good reason. If daddy decides to leave his family, he has to pay for the kids he had voluntarily with his former wife. No choice there.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 12:07 PM
3

One of the many positions that we should share with feminists.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 11:48 AM
2

WTF? Source? This sounds extremely unlikely.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 11:42 AM
-6

we kept having unprotected sex FTFY. Protection is not only a women's issue, this is why so many of us wind up with unwanted kids in the first place.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 11:41 AM
2

Wise words, Lemondoodle.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 01:18 AM
10

I don't have to be an MRA to be an MRA? slamdog uses confusion. It's very effective.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 05:28 PM
7

I'm pretty sure that feminists think the same way about MR.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 05:27 PM
0

I'm far from being on his side, but what makes him a "douche cookie"? He just has a different, apparently pretty conservative, political perspective. On the other hand is ridiculing main stream positions like paid contraceptives kind of stupid. It's not like Fluke's position is in any way out of the ordinary.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 10:34 PM
2

Yeah, we kind of forget often how Islam sucks for both, men and women.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 10:29 PM
2

I still tend to disagree (without being able to cite any sources). Sims, Fable, Tycoons series are complex and gender neutral. In my eyes there are few "deep" games that are clearly targeted to men, like GTA.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 10:19 PM
5

I don't know, man. I play FIFA and some MW3. My SO still play Fable 2, in her quest of fucking every single person in the world. Or something like that.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 09:29 PM
9

We really need to stop our attitude towards stuff like that. We developed something like a chain when presented with articles we disagree with: I disagree with the article That means the author is wrong That means he's either stupid or has bad motives That means he's a bad person and the article is bad Let's grow up, people. I disagree on some points, agree with others. Media does show women as trophies for the hero - but aren't there also male trophies (Prince Charmings) for heroines? I also th…
/r/MensRights27/03/12 08:33 PM
26

Sorry, but I just can't take people seriously who use femsplained/mansplaining.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 08:20 PM
3

Out of curiosity: How did you get a hold of their private messages? Did the mod post it in /r/askreddit?
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:19 PM
1

Please don't get me wrong. It's certainly not America-centric because of ignorant subscribers, it's because it's one of the subreddits where your origin actually matters. We can all relate to funny pictures of cats, but anti-man regulation in a random university in the US isn't that important to me.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 12:30 PM
0

Thanks. This was more or less my impression.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:43 AM
3

This. Boycotting doesn't solve problems, talking does. It also helps to "humanize the enemy", which is a good thing. These spaces are occupied by individuals whom we cannot convince with logic or personal opinions I'm certain many feminists feel the same way about this subreddit.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 01:47 AM
–

Came to this subreddit to see if it'd be like this. It was. Same here. I'm glad only parts of it are like that. To me, MR seems kind of like r/atheism. I share the opinion, but a decent part of the posts don't help anybody and it feels like "moderates" aren't too welcome. Just like /r/atheism, it's also too America-centric to be really interesting for me.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 01:42 AM
9

Because it's not an important part of the following discussion. I downvote it so others can the see the "real" comments first. I'm pretty sure I don't hurt his feelings.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 01:37 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter