TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kriboshoe Archive

View 0 posts and 47 comments by kriboshoe on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

The problem is that men are convicted of sex related crimes with low evidence. That needs to be solved. Preventing laws against revenge porn is not a solution to that problem, and is, I'm my opinion, morally wrong.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 04:28 PM
2

I think you are confused. That was the comment he made on 2xc. They were saying that feminists should focus on ensuring abortion is readily available, not that mras should focus on ensuring that it isn't. That probably isn't super clear if you didn't see their comment on the other sub.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 08:18 PM
3

There can be more than one victim. It isn't a competition.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:31 PM
3

Honestly I'm pleased when men's rights is mentioned and not immediately linked to trp.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 02:04 PM
2

That doesn't go as well when they are directed to TRP.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 11:00 AM
8

History of abuse should certainly be factored in when determining custody, and not just when the perpetrator was male.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 12:21 PM
2

Regardless they should be available to qualifying people of either gender in case someone does want to do it now or in the future.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 10:59 AM
4

Do you honestly not think that "men oppressed women"? Like not ever?
/r/MensRights31/05/14 04:12 PM
1

Please put a disclaimer that upvotes and downvotes as seen by RES do not directly correlate to actual upvotes and downvotes before someone tries to insinuate that x% of /r/MensRights[1] wants to make friendzoning illegal.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 03:39 PM
2

You can actually pierce a baby's ears. It's perfectly legal. It shouldn't be though.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:27 PM
1

They can hold whatever views they like so long as I can be as outraged as I see fit.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 02:33 PM
1

The show writers and their views on rape exist in the real world with the rest of us.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 02:24 PM
1

The outrage was largely about the creator's comments that the sex became consensual during the act even though it started out as rape. I tend to agree with that outrage. If it started as rape, then it was rape.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 01:20 PM
9

The problem isn't that there was a rape scene. This was far from the first. The problem was the creators saying it was consensual at the end, which I think is fine because it was what the characters were meant to feel about it, but I wouldn't say it makes it not rape.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 02:12 AM
2

I would argue that feminists do have something to complain about in the wage gap, but most of the complaints I hear are not the right ones. The fact that women choose lower paying jobs is a legacy of traditional gender roles, so that mode of thinking needs to change. In the same vein men need to be seen as the providers, thus the high risk taking. I don't think either has much to do with outright discrimination, just a toxic cultural mindset of what the genders should be like. Unfortunately you …
/r/MensRights09/04/14 02:04 AM
2

In defense of r feminism the top comments of that article agree that this is a useless pissing contest over who has it worse.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 07:45 PM
26

That is exactly the same as the wage gap. You are comparing all men to all women, when the main reason for the gap is that men "choose" higher risk occupations just like women "choose" lower pay occupations. These stats have very similar meanings and likely stem from the same source.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 07:34 PM
4

It's a childless task which affects both genders equally and it has nothing to do with feminism.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 03:20 PM
1

While the policy is obviously horrendously sexist the article did not tie it to feminism. I expected to see a story of femenist groups campaigning against male birth control options being included or something similar from the title.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 12:28 PM
0

The title is very misleading. Most of the links the article provides don't deal with feminism preventing men's rights.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 05:48 PM
-4

We are supposed to be about men's rights. Not random anti-feminism.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 03:13 PM
1

This is not what rape is. Your girlfriend is just into BDSM. Not at all the same thing.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 02:10 AM
3

I mean this is taken from a WordPress. They may as well not exist.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 04:52 PM
5

I think the article's explanation makes a lot of sense. Less men are graduating from college than women, therefore men are making less money on average. Obviously the problem that needs to be dealt with is how men and women are treated differently, particularly non-white men, in the education system.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 02:45 AM
-5

"Because in order to identify as a feminist you have to believe in the concept of "patriarchy" - the idea that all men oppress all women all the time." So you, personally are allowed to define feminism? I would say that in order to be a feminist you have to believe that a. there are some areas in society where inequality exists for women, and b. this inequality should not exist. I would say that in order to be an MRA you would believe the same thing, but for men. These are not in any way mutuall…
/r/MensRights31/08/13 03:55 PM
0

God, is it really that fucking hard to get verbal consent? "Do you want this" "Fuck yes" Done.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 10:53 PM
1

If you go through the lower rated comments in this thread it is pretty clear that not everyone thinks that you should be getting clear consent for sex... so there is certainly the potential for some people to be helped by a campaign like this.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 10:49 PM
1

I don't know, it seems pretty intentionally gender neutral...
/r/MensRights11/08/13 10:46 PM
0

In some situations maybe sometimes silence, coupled with body language, can be considered consent, but there are also plenty of situations were it absolutely cannot. Unless you know that the other party is comfortable with such things it is always better to get a "yes".
/r/MensRights11/08/13 04:17 AM
2

I think you are misinterpreting Chicago. This song, and the show in general, was making fun of the fact that people viewed over-hyped murderesses as celebrities, rather than criminals.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 09:34 PM
4

I'm pretty sure a child with parents in an unhappy marriage are going to be worse off than a child with amicably divorced parents. Source: I've been in the first, then the second situation.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 10:56 PM
3

http://i.imgur.com/U3j9GYu.jpg
/r/MensRights10/02/13 04:23 PM
16

There was an article on /r/feminism yesterday with the same question, just with feminism instead of MR. The author reasoned that a specific group was helpful in order to narrow down on particular issues. In a humanist group MR would be lost in a sea of LGBQ rights, elderly rights, feminism, and equal rights across race and religion. All of these things are important, abut you can't have all of these things at once. Focusing on any one of these things should be a subset of humanism.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 12:07 AM
16

It's an invasion of privacy. I wouldn't want my girlfriend going through my mail.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 12:00 AM
-1

I don't really think she is. She is just trying to get more women to run for public office. Getting more people to run offers more choice and is a good thing. She even states pretty clearly that she doesn't think women are better fit to govern then men, she just thinks that diversity in government is good.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:16 AM
2

I agree that this post was very flawed, but calling MRAs misogynists as a generality is just as unfair. There is no reason anyone can't be both a feminist and a MRA.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 12:46 AM
10

This doesn't seem to have anything to do with feminists.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 11:39 PM
3

Do you have an article to back up feminists protesting the ban on male circumcision, because I couldn't find one. Also defining a group by what they choose not to protest is unfair. You made several good points, but you flooded those good points by naming discrimination men face and arguing that feminists don't protest these. In these cases feminists are not the enemy. They are at worst a passive bystander. We should be pro-men and pro-person in general. Not anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:54 PM
2

They said in the article that they were considering doing just that. Seems pretty fair to me.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:26 PM
3

"The board's decision has been appealed and a court will determine whether hairdressers need to find a new way to charge for their services, in the length of time, or the standard of the cut."
/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:25 PM
28

Feminists are not mentioned in this article. One dude that is trying to promote family, not a particular feminist position, is mentioned in opposition to the law.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:11 PM
38

Is it ever mentioned in the article that Robert Whalen, the man who made the comment about removing the privileges of marriage was a feminist? It wasn't. He is a member of a think tank, and one of the things they do is, for better or worse, promote marriage. Not everyone who disagrees with you is a feminist and not all feminists disagree with you.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:07 PM
-11

That was almost certainly a joke.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 01:53 PM
3

... wouldn't a complete end to false rape accusations be literally the best thing that could happen to actual rape victims? If everyone was sure that the rape accusations that made it through whatever the filtering process was were completely legitimate then they would be taken completely seriously, which they absolutely should. I don't understand how this harms actual victims.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 05:59 PM
-2

Exactly as bad as the original poster.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 02:43 AM
3

I'm going to need all of those links to be clickable. Thanks.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 05:20 PM
1

She was an underdog and she needed some publicity to get her name out there. Seems to have had at least a little success. It was a decent idea.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 11:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter