TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

krudler5 Archive

View 5 posts and 72 comments by krudler5 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's not like the police are going to believe a denial by the guy. Even if they do believe the guy (assuming he is innocent), thanks to crap like the Duluth model a lot of police departments have a "must arrest" policy where one of the two people involved in a alleged domestic dispute must be arrested. And that is usually the guy.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/21 05:15 PM
1

Claim they have no idea who the father is. They may not be certain, but they likely have an idea of who could be the father.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/21 01:53 AM
5

This kind of stuff makes me afraid to have kids. You have no way of knowing whether someone is a decent person (or whether they will use the kids as weapons) until you're going through a divorce, and by then it is too late. I think that collaborative divorce should be a mandatory first step, only proceeding to an adversarial process if the collaborative process fails. When your lawyer has a financial incentive to not go for the "total war" mindset, they'll be more inclined to push their clients …
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/21 04:50 PM
2

She probably applied for some form of social assistance. When you do that, they go after the other parent for child support — you don't have a choice, it's the state's call.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/09/16 11:08 PM
1

What were the Agent Orange leaks?
/r/MensRights12/08/16 01:52 PM
2

When the police ask you if you want to press charges, it doesn't really mean that you have any control over whether they do. Although private prosecutions are a thing in both the US and Canada (although fairly limited and the state — either the DA or the Crown, depending on your country — can opt to take over the case — and probably dismiss the charges).
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/16 01:28 PM
4

In Michigan a friend of mine got socked by her boyfriend, she called the cops because he wouldn't leave the house, which she owns, she didnt want him charged, just gone. From what I've been told the prosecutor is pursuing charges anyways. That's good!
/r/MensRights01/05/16 03:26 PM
8

Ever seen that picture of the couple sorting through their Beanie Baby (sp?) investment collection in front of the judge?
/r/MensRights04/01/16 04:49 PM
5

History has it all wrong: men weren't being benevolent when they put the women & children on the lifeboats when the Titanic was sinking — they were sick of their BS and wanted some 'guy time' before they died. /s
/r/MensRights21/12/15 02:45 AM
2

Unfortunately, that is not true. Generally, in order to sue for slander or libel, the person must know that what they are saying is false, the information must be publicly printed (e.g. a newspaper deliberately printing false and derogatory information about a political candidate). It must also be shown that the statement is being presented as fact and not as an opinion. You don't generally get to sue somebody just because they tell a couple people something untrue.. The aunt may very well genui…
/r/MensRights21/12/15 02:39 AM
38

Who raised us again, if our fathers were absent? Shots fired!
/r/MensRights04/12/15 11:08 AM
2

This may sound like a troll question or stupid question, but I'm looking for a serious reply. If "trans" and "cis" are two sides of the same coin (simply meaning there is a difference), how and why did we start referring to transgendered people as "trans"? Why not "cis"? Is there a specific reason that the prefix "trans" is used and not something else? Just to be clear, I'm not trying to redefine the word or take anything away from anyone or insult anyone or anything. I'm just curious as to the …
/r/MensRights21/05/15 01:02 AM
7

Isn't "cis" a recently-coined term? I can't recall having heard anyone use the term "cis-gender" before the last 3 or 4 years...
/r/MensRights20/05/15 11:25 PM
1

I would LOVE to see that epsiode!!
/r/MensRights10/03/15 02:31 PM
4

I know this thread is about 5 days old at this point, but if you can find the video of that episode, I'd love to see that part.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 02:22 PM
1

I wasn't clear in my posts, but the "pickup artist" tactics I take issue with are primarily things like man slowly escalating the amount of touching he does with the intention of wearing down her resistance to being touched (e.g. starting with light strokes of the arm or face, and progressing to more intimate touching over a period of time). I really don't know how much that kind of stuff plays a role in "pick up artist" tactics. I will admit that after I read about that, I mostly wrote it off a…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 03:54 PM
1

Ya, OK. Keep telling yourself that. LOL
/r/MensRights03/03/15 03:46 PM
4

In my opinion, /r/theredpill and "pick-up artists" are demeaning to women. There's a huge difference between advocating for equal rights as a MRA, and treating women like trash as a "pick-up artist" or someone who genuinely believes the garbage espoused by members of /r/theredpill. I'm not going to give people an excuse to dismiss me as misogynistic simply because you include sexism and demeaning behaviour as "other aspects of the manosphere." You don't need to be an asshole to be a man. You als…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 10:00 PM
2

Thank you for those links. I always appreciate an in-depth reply that cites articles and/or studies for follow-up reading.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 08:23 PM
1

Thank you for the kind words. I don't pretend to have all of the answers to all of society's problems. It would be sheer hubris for me to tell you that your opinion is 110% completely wrong with no merit at all, and that mine is The Only Reasonable Opinion® . I try to keep an open mind, and that can be hard in ideological discussions. Many people have very polarized views about topics like religion, money, feminism/MRM, abortion, etc. To be honest, I sometimes struggle with acknowledging that ot…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 07:59 PM
3

Good point.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 07:36 PM
9

I'm sorry, but are you being sarcastic? Or do you actually take issue with my comment you replied to?
/r/MensRights02/03/15 07:35 PM
5

Very true. In fact, this post on /r/changemyview, titled, "CMV: Feminism isn't the answer for Men" currently has a score of 513 and a 73% upvotes.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 03:34 PM
2

Exactly! In the article, she (wrongly) discusses another article that discusses a recent interview on Fox. Both articles try to make it sound like the interview was bashing women having strong, leading roles in movies. But, if you actually watch the clip (which you can see if you follow the link in OP's article to the article she is referring to), it totally misrepresents the interview.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 03:32 PM
8

I often notice that people conflate the Men's Rights Movement with places like /r/theredpill (which is no different than some feminist sites), and MRA's with "pick-up artists." I have no doubt that there are MRA's that genuinely believe and espouse /r/theredpill BS and/or would describe themselves as "pick-up artists," but it is wrong and unfair to assume that we are all the same. Some of us will disagree with others in the movement, and that's OK. We are not trying to be a totalitarian movement…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 03:29 PM
2

It's too bad that this bill devolved into something focused entirely on women and girls. If the bill implemented the suggestions in a modified way (to include both men and women), it would actually be fantastic! Imagine if there were a staff member in each school "with expertise and the knowledge and confidence to assist pupils in seeking assistance and information," or if education on intimate partner violence and healthy relationships was mandatory on the school curriculum (ideally everywhere!…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:45 PM
1

The section of the population least likely to experience violence, has the entire discourse turned in their direction, and ensures that the actual issue of violence in society cannot be properly understood. Please don't think I'm disagreeing with you, but I'd like you to clarify a something for me: when you say, "[t]he section of the population least likely to experience violence," do you mean in general? It seems to me that the bill is primarily attempting to tackle violence against women/girls…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:40 PM
2

Critics of the Men's Rights movement often conflate Men's Rights with /r/TheRedPill or "pick-up artists." There is a HUGE difference between /r/mensrights and /r/theredpill. I'm Catholic and am against all abortion, so my opinion on the following issue is entirely incidental, but: I firmly believe that allowing a mother to abort a baby that the father wants to raise should be prohibited. A baby shouldn't be killed just because the mother regrets not taking precautions1. Both partners share equal…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:30 PM
5

Douglas Dendinger's nephew is/was suing a (now former) police officer named Chad Cassard. Dendinger needed to earn extra money ($50 in this case), so he agreed to be the process server (the person who formally notifies the person being sued that they are being sued) who delivered the summons to the officer (Cassard). When Dendinger served Cassard, he did it in front of "a group of officers and attorneys clustered around [Cassard]." Dendinger, probably anticipating some backlash from the police f…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:01 PM
1

Wow, I didn't realize it was that bad. I apologize if I was rude or otherwise offensive in my first post. I hope things improve in the future.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 02:23 PM
2

I'm not sure why people are down-voting you. Alimony is one thing, but child support? How could that possibly be controversial? If I had a kid (or more than one), I would have NO problem paying to support them if I got fucked over for custody and didn't win joint custody. Of course I'd want to make sure that the money actually went to the kid(s), but I'd still pay it if there was doubt (it's the right thing to do). As for the wife being threatened with jail: I firmly believe that, unless there i…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 09:34 PM
4

Just in the same way a blonde-haired, blue-eyed aryan well-known at his Catholic church wasn't going to get a taste of his own medicine while he labored for the registration of Jews. If you're referring to Adolph Hitler, I would like to clarify that although his mother was a devout Roman Catholic, by the time Hitler was starting his campaign against the Jews, he was no longer Christian (in fact, he openly disliked Christians). I know this is off-topic, but as a Catholic, I can't stand to see Hit…
/r/MensRights17/02/15 08:40 PM
3

That is SO fucked up :(. I'm glad to hear that you're no longer in that relationship.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 01:50 PM
2

Only caveat to that is to make sure that he doesn't need her permission to record the phone conversations (or even in-person). Some states allow a person to record a conversation as long as at least one person involved in the conversation allows it (which would be OP), but some require that all parties to a conversation must give permission (meaning that he would have to ask her for permission before recording, preferably having that permission recorded).
/r/MensRights09/02/15 01:48 PM
1

I'm sorry, but I honestly don't understand what you mean. What does having (reasonable) restrictions on when and where the parents can move have to do with pre-divorce counseling or trying to make things work? As far as I understand it, that kind of stipulation in the custody agreement greatly benefits the child(ren) if the parents do end up divorcing as it helps to avoid them suddenly being moved to another school (possibly in another city, or even another state/province). It also benefits the …
/r/MensRights03/01/15 08:55 PM
5

Edit: And lastly, always live close enough to the school your child is going to go to, and have it in your custody agreement that the child can not be removed or change schools without both parents approval. (many times the other parent will suddenly try and switch schools to try and force the other to lose custodial grounds, sudden change of jobs, and states you live in, as the years pass if you end up spending less custodial time with your child that enables the other parent to push for even m…
/r/MensRights03/01/15 01:51 PM
2

I agree.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 01:37 PM
2

That's actually a really brilliant idea!
/r/MensRights03/01/15 01:36 PM
7

If he successfully presses charges, then there would be proof that it happened the way he said it did, and that the woman is full of shit if she claims otherwise.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 09:15 PM
8

Close the Gender Studies Feminist Indoctrination Department FTFY
/r/MensRights06/12/14 09:04 PM
4

I don't believe that anybody benefits from a knee-jerk reaction that isn't based on facts determined by an objective, independent, impartial investigation.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 09:02 PM
3

Also, I did some research on George Brown's policies and procedures. It's at the bottom of the page right now, but here is a link: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2na5fk/i_was_denied_my_right_to_vote_at_my_college/cmbzecf
/r/MensRights24/11/14 10:31 PM
2

You might also want to look at the Constitution (2012) and SAGBC By-Laws (2013), which can be found here: http://studentassociation.ca/about/documents/
/r/MensRights24/11/14 10:15 PM
10

OK, so here is some information about GB's anti-discrimination polices taken from here under "PREVENTION OF DISCRIMINATION & HARASSMENT POLICY ". SECTION 2.7 While the College expects that the procedures outlined in the document will lead to internal resolution of issues of discrimination and harassment, every person continues to have a right to seek assistance from the Ontario Human Rights Commission even when steps are being taken under this Policy. and SECTION 3.1 This Policy prohibits discri…
/r/MensRights24/11/14 10:11 PM
40

The equal access to vote would only apply to federal/provincial/municipal elections, not university/college/whatever. However, the college he attends almost certainly has some sort of relevant policy document that outlines student rights and responsibilities.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 09:53 PM
7

You could also try filing a complaint with the Ontario Human Rights Commission.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 09:52 PM
1

Why the age limit?
/r/MensRights11/11/14 04:29 PM
12

Actually, he is. Circumcision in this case is completely unnecessary and there are no benefits. It's equivalent to female genital mutilation. Now, if the son was 14 and was able to provide informed consent for the procedure and decided to go through with it, that's perfectly OK. But forcing a small child to undergo a painful procedure with no benefits, probably only because the dad wants to piss off the mom, is NOT OK, and is most definitely harming the child. Would YOU have chosen to be circumc…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 02:08 AM
14

Excellent point! My only counter-point would be that the urologist in the case testified that circumcisions don't really become problematic (physically, not psychologically) until about age 10. That being said, I of course agree that this is BS. It's unfortunate that the mother agreed to it in the first place. On another note: it is very refreshing to see that it is the mother fighting it. I don't get why the dad is so intent on harming his son??
/r/MensRights10/11/14 10:37 PM
2

As much as I'd like to contact him, I don't believe it will do any good. The best one could hope for is to file an "amicus brief" ("friend of the court"); the judge probably won't even read your email or the OP's petition. Imagine if he did? Anybody and everybody could influence the outcome of a court case. In some cases, that might be OK, but in most it would be inappropriate to have a non-lawyer who has no connection to the case influencing the outcome.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 10:35 PM
1

I've only ever seen the HPV vaccine being advertised to women. Can men get the vaccine? Does it provide any benefit?
/r/MensRights10/11/14 10:32 PM
5

I would not be surprised if this leads to people (and by people, I mean rad feminists) lobbying the legislature to change the law (whether or not the law would stand up in court is another matter, but it doesn't mean they won't try -- just look at all of the states passing abortion laws).
/r/MensRights05/11/14 02:36 PM
1

How can anyone own a colour?! Edit: I mean, I believe you, but it's just so absurd!
/r/MensRights03/11/14 05:33 PM
9

I kept reading that article about opposing the Equal Parenting Bill, kept looking for some potential flaw. Instead we are given gems like: That the best and only way for both parents to be active in a child's life is through joint custody; and That the need for a child to have both parents in their life supersedes the child's need for safety and stability. I can't even begin to understand how having both parents involved would lead to safety & stability issues. If there was overwhelming evidence…
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:58 PM
1

"Hard Out Here" has an 'interesting' bridge: Sometimes it's hard to find the words to say I'll go ahead and say them anyway Forget your balls and grow a pair of tits SMH... Edit: I thought "Ooh La La" was originally by Rod Stewart. TIL!
/r/MensRights25/10/14 11:33 AM
1

Two things popped into my head as I was reading your replies: To illustrate the 60's/70's "male-ness": the song "(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction" by the Rolling Stones To illustrate the modern [female] "very aggressive and dominating and liberating-to-the-extreme": the singer Beyonce I have to agree with what you've written. I think that if an artist were to be so aggressively pro-masculine as Beyonce is pro-feminine, they would probably have poor sales and be called out as a "misogynist."
/r/MensRights24/10/14 11:25 PM
1

There was a 'men's liberation' movement in the 70s I think. and: We've got a men's rights/father's rights party here Can you please tell me more about these two things?
/r/MensRights24/10/14 09:58 PM
1

Police and prosecuting attorney's make their living on knowing when someone is bullshitting. While it's possible to make a false accusation it isn't trivial. Good to know, thank you.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 01:25 PM
1

You make an excellent point.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 01:42 PM
1

Are there any other crimes where you can be arrested and prosecuted merely on someone's accusation? Presumably for most (if not all) other crimes, some form of independent evidence (e.g. video/audio recordings, physical evidence like drugs seized, etc.) is required in order to justify bringing charges. Or, at least, I would sincerely hope.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 10:02 PM
1

This ought to lead to acquittal (actually it ought to lead to the police not arresting in the first place and prosecutors refusing to bring a charge), but there are cases where that's all it took to get a rape conviction and years later DNA evidence finds the guy is innocent. Do you have any idea regarding how often a case comes down to he-said/she-said (or whatever the genders of the parties involved may be)? Do sexual assault cases typically have more evidence than just accuser vs. defendant? …
/r/MensRights04/10/14 10:00 PM
5

It's "funny" (as in strange, not "ha ha"), because I moved to my current city in 2002. Since then, two female teachers predators (one elementary, one secondary) have been arrested and convicted for having sex with a male student. Yet, you never hear the news describing them the way they would a male teacher/predator if they were arrested for having sex with a female student (which, by the way, hasn't happened -- there haven't been any male teachers arrested since I moved here).
/r/MensRights03/10/14 08:52 PM
6

However, some police and prosecutors appear to be willfully refusing to honor their legal duties to protect all victims. One male victim in California was told, "If we arrest her the DA will see a domestic dispute and issue a warrant for your arrest."' In New York, a man recently entered a police station visibly injured from his female abuser, and he stated police tampered with evidence, including records of his trip to the hospital, in order to paint his female abuser as the victim. I'd love to…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 08:48 PM
3

Agreed.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 07:42 PM
18

I actually like the top comment: As someone in this exact position, let me say this: I will take alimony because I have been home and out of the workforce since we married. Now we have two small children, and I had to leave college when I was pregnant with the first. The assumption was that I would finish college once the youngest was in school but his affair has ruined that plan. Now I struggle to find a way to support myself and my kids and the most I can hope for it minimum wage at a fast foo…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 04:30 PM
2

I think they're saying that they will remove the post that was linked to, not the post linking to it.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 09:31 PM
3

I LOVE this: "It appears you have been linked here from another subreddit. TwoXChromosomes doesn't permit linking to other subreddits in order to discourage drama and trolling. Likewise, linking to 2X from other subreddits may be subject to removal. If you wish to discuss a 2X thread in another subreddit please use screenshots instead of direct links in order to keep meta discussions in the appropriate subreddits."
/r/MensRights29/08/14 11:55 AM
1

I really like this comment: In my 15 years of teaching high school, I've seen clear discrimination against boys. When boys mouth off they get suspension while girls get counseling. Boys scare female teachers and receive harsher consequences than girls for the same behaviors. The teacher training universities are full of failed female teachers with strong-minded ideologies about education based on their failed experiences. Preparing teachers for the classroom needs a complete overhaul. No more 1-…
/r/MensRights19/07/14 07:53 PM
1

I love how: Of course I planned on taking my 2 1/2 year old with me. No consideration for the father's rights!
/r/MensRights19/07/14 07:44 PM
5

I have to agree with you on this one.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 07:18 PM
2

It promised specific proposals in another report by the end of this year but indicated they would involve reversing the burden of proof in prosecutions for domestic assault and ending the courts' "gender bias" which meant "perpetrators were often not held accountable for their behaviour". Unbelievable! Are they ACTUALLY recommending that alleged perp's need to prove they're innocent, instead of the state proving they're guilty?! Wow...
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:42 PM
2

Try cross-posting to /r/legaladvice. Make sure to state the province or state you live in in your post. Good luck!
/r/MensRights01/07/14 09:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter