TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kryptoday Archive

View 0 posts and 39 comments by kryptoday on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No. Mods have full control of their subs. Admins don't give a fuck and would probably never overrule a ban. I thought some subs had an auto-ban bot, where if you posted to one sub you got banned from another. Or maybe that was a rumour. In any case mods can do what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 02:07 PM
4

I'm not a RPW but I hope you listen to me anyway. If what you say is true, then you are suffering domestic abuse/domestic violence. It is NOT your fault he loses control. It sounds like he has severe emotional problems and they are taking a toll on you. You are a loyal wife, but being loyal does NOT mean suffering abuse. He is not being alpha. He is being psychotic. I'm involved in the kinky sex community, and consent is number one thing you want to establish before any sort of freakiness. He so…
/r/RedPillWomen30/12/14 09:26 AM
1

Have you filed a complaint? I think it's important you do.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 07:51 AM
4

So, going along with the focus of your post, why do you think there's a discrepancy between reported stimulation and actual stimulation?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/14 07:21 AM
1

Wow, definitely seems like an abusive relationship. It's good you got out. Hopefully she gets help and you meet someone better for you.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 08:31 AM
0

It's high enough for a fairly decent correlation to be made. If both genders are equally talkative in progressive academic settings then maybe your theory isn't quite right.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:11 PM
0

Actually they're equally talkative. Maybe try and actually research the stuff you're talking about rather than just regurgitating shit you've half-read based on gender stereotypes.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 12:58 PM
1

No. Don't politicise this tragedy. Especially when there are barely any details.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 07:43 AM
2

She swears women can't hold a quality (key word) conversation as well as men. She says girls just talk stories and non-sense about them selves. Thankfully her friends aren't representative of an entire gender
/r/MensRights13/08/14 06:04 AM
0

I agree
/r/MensRights17/07/14 12:09 PM
3

I believe /r/CensoredByFeminists was created for posts like these Anyway... It was probably deleted because a) they get a lot of trolls talking about false rape accusations b) they believe rape is worse than lying about rape c) they don't think false rape accusers should serve the same (or half) amount of time as rapists, as they did not commit rape d) they saw you post in mr and didn't want the drama
/r/MensRights17/07/14 08:37 AM
-4

Some people are anti-gun and democrats represent them. It makes sense they will continue to further that line of policy/conversation, especially when mass-shootings happen. Because women are manipulated by emotion more than fact. They feel. Facts and statistics are meaningless. It's about dead white babies, dead white babies, dead white babies. You're a fool.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 01:47 PM
0

There's a difference in saying 'the vast majority of swing voters are women so politicians make sure to address them' and 'as opposed to men, women are so easily swayed based on their feelings that politicians can manipulate them with empty compliments'
/r/MensRights24/06/14 01:04 PM
2

Oh I agree. It's just /u/snockadilez was implying that only women vote like that
/r/MensRights24/06/14 12:59 PM
3

But why even say it? Do you think a majority of women vote like that?
/r/MensRights24/06/14 11:27 AM
3

Or maybe you could just not imply that all women's actions are based on easily manipulated feelings
/r/MensRights24/06/14 11:18 AM
6

You don't need to tell women about concrete policies to get their votes, just make them feel good Because women don't think, they only feel? Way to be stupidly condescending.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 10:49 AM
2

You wish you were there to sing a song about brutally assaulting women? All the while a few women were forced to listen (in a confined space/surrounded by men)?
/r/MensRights22/06/14 10:02 PM
1

And? They're investigating. That's it.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 11:32 AM
1

So? It looks like they were very clear about what they were agreeing to. They weren't struggling to walk or talk - they just looked buzzed and ready to party.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 12:49 AM
2

They agreed to it though? This isn't a mr issue.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 12:11 AM
2

They're unethical, but they're not a cheater.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 07:49 AM
0

How does he pander? And what was wrong with the end?
/r/MensRights28/04/14 08:37 AM
1

the sentence for that crime should be 1.5x the penalty that their victim would have gotten. But why? They didn't rape anyone. They lied. They should be charged accordingly. And why do you feel they should be charged 1.5x? Why not 2x, or 4x? It's really arbitrary. It is a very serious crime. And so is rape. So is murder. So are a lot of crimes. I think false rape accusers should get harsher sentences, but not 1.5x that of a rapist. It is not at all akin to perjury It is exactly perjury, and women…
/r/MensRights25/04/14 07:22 AM
0

the sentence should be at least 1.5 times that which the falsely accused could have served if found guilty of the falsely accused crime That's ridiculous. You can't sentence them to 1.5x the penalty of a rapist when they've lied about being raped. They should be charged with perjury (or something akin to it). You don't want people to be charged/sentenced with crimes they haven't committed, yet you're happy to send someone to jail with the prison sentence of a crime they haven't committed? Stupid…
/r/MensRights23/04/14 07:27 AM
4

I don't see the problem with the word. It's extremely common in Australia.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 03:01 PM
2

What kind of class is this for? By which I mean, what kind of class would assign an essay about which gender is more degraded/oppressed for liking very traditionally gender-specific things? Different things get shamed in different ways for different reasons. You used the Twilight example for women, and you could use wrestling as an example for men. None of these are good examples because the topic is shitty. Maybe if you could elaborate more I'd understand.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 08:02 AM
1

A slut is someone who has a lot of sex with different people. You can be a slut who doesn't hurt feelings and just likes sex. Or you can be a slut who manipulates people and is dishonest. Your ex just sounds like a shitty person.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 07:53 AM
1

Actually 140 is a perfectly acceptable sample size.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 08:33 AM
9

Exactly right - no label should be forced upon any person unless they've specifically chosen it.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 11:02 AM
2

Haha I think it's Jack Antonoff
/r/MensRights15/11/13 08:19 AM
2

No worries. I realise what I say may not be the usual thing that's said here, but that's ok. I'll just say what I think. I agree. It is unfair. But I think we should start with the smaller things like, as I said, the male contraceptive and fixing the child support laws. If correcting those things doesn't help make both genders equal, then we should take more drastic measures. But I feel it's not as simple as that, because biologically a female is the only one who can bear children. I'm not sayin…
/r/MensRights13/11/13 10:09 AM
-1

Going to say outright here: I'm not against LPS, but I'm not for it. I feel we need to put in place other more important rights for men (like the male contraceptive and fixing the fucked up child support shit) before that can be a legitimate alternative. Once they've been put in place for a while, we should reassess, and then come up with a solution if need be. But I feel most MRAs and feminists agree on a woman's right to abortion, as do I. To be frank, yes, LPS would 'violate' the rights of th…
/r/MensRights13/11/13 09:22 AM
-2

Well it's generally not considered normal to remove the tonsils/appendix/gall bladder at birth, so I can kind of understand that. That nurse sounds like a fucking champ. I would try and refrain from equating it to female stuff. Males and females are different (and similar) in many ways.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 04:18 PM
4

Well, the term "rape culture" was first coined when talking about male prison rape.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 02:51 PM
3

But you have to remember there are a lot of males who are ok with it being done to their sons - mainly males who have had it done themselves.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 02:44 PM
10

Catholicism falls under the Christianity umbrella...
/r/seduction28/07/13 09:44 AM
2

Have you ever been in love before her? I know I'm in no position to say what 'love' is for other people, but honestly it sounds more like deep infatuation. Sleepless nights and constant thoughts about the other person are all symptoms of infatuation, especially considering you've only known her for a short period of time. For me at least, love is [partly] knowing everything about the other person, warts and all, and loving them despite/because of those things. Anyway, yeah if she's flat out said…
/r/seduction28/08/12 02:12 PM
2

As a girl, I probably wouldn't expect too many things from this chick (so I hope you aren't really in love with her). Do you pay for the climbing or does she pay for herself? If she's not paying, she may be using you. It sounds like you two did have a little moment when you when back to hers to smoke etc. In terms of the person she says she's dating, assuming they exist, it's possible she was doubting the decision to date him, which then led to that moment. Perhaps things started going well with…
/r/seduction28/08/12 01:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter