TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kryptx Archive

View 0 posts and 35 comments by kryptx on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This. I am not unwilling to vote, especially for initiatives. But the candidates? I wouldn't be able to sleep at night knowing I helped elect any of those shitheads.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 06:16 PM
5

Not only what's gender equality, but what does it mean to "believe in" it?
/r/MensRights26/04/19 09:30 PM
1

Yeah, opensource.org is not a highly technical organization, nor do they have any authority. It's mostly an advocacy group. Men tend not to be attracted to working for advocacy groups. To be honest, I find it a little odd that VMWare thought it was worth mentioning like this. Even if it's the first time it's happened, I'd think you'd have to be a pretty radical feminist to think it's something to brag about.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 07:39 PM
10

WHERE SHOULD MEN GO? Jesus. As men are squeezed out of positions women want, anywhere they are squeezed into, there are accusations of prejudice. Tell me where it's okay if they happen to wind up being the majority. Apparently it's just sewage workers and the NBA.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 11:43 PM
17

If it's taxpayer dollars, as he claimed, I would disagree. I can't find enough info on USA Hockey to be sure, but it certainly looks like they are non-profit and funded by private donations. If that's the case, then ... yeah, who cares? Not our money.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 09:33 PM
1

it's only a matter of time before big boy hits back. I don't think we'll be so fortunate. Part of their strategy is to disarm the big boy. They do that by telling boys and men "don't work hard to earn a lot of money because this is a manifestation of patriarchy and privilege over the lower class", telling girls and women "DO work hard to earn a lot of money because that's how we overthrow them", and telling organizations "hire more women and fewer men, even if the men you happen to interview are…
/r/MensRights06/02/19 04:01 PM
27

Yeah, it sucks when somebody can just say they're oppressed and change the rules in their favor, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights05/02/19 07:04 PM
1

You know, I have never visited /r/MGTOW, and I don't feel especially inclined to. Although I do feel that becoming a disciplined, fully independent individual is a worthy goal and one I aspire to, joining a community of "men going their own way" feels like an impossible contradiction to me. The idea that I'm "going my own way" says nothing about what I have in common with other people who are going their own way. Our paths will naturally cross wherever our interests intersect. What, exactly, wou…
/r/MensRights30/01/19 05:29 PM
5

I'm honestly not sure if, as a response to somebody feeling uncomfortable as a result of my presence in public, I'd rather be asked to leave or physically attacked. It's close, but I think I'd rather be attacked. Like you said, it makes it more evident who the attacker actually is, rather than leaving it up to ambiguous perception.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 06:03 PM
2

This is horrible hate-mongering and abuse of power, but there is a tiny nugget of kindness. The very last line lets you know -- look, if someone accuses you of something, and you said something that may be consistent with a popular stereotype about men, this will be considered evidence, for better or worse.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 04:00 PM
3

A few years ago there was this one girl on Tinder who I had been trying to get to go out with me for weeks, to no avail. When I traded my Acura TL for a brand-new BMW 535 (the Acura was only a few years old, btw -- this was a terrible decision) , she invited me over to her place that very night. Drove straight there from the dealership.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 12:11 AM
5

“We did it purely for security reasons, because it’s statistically proven that women are more likely to be victims of [sexually] violent crime than men,” Wait what? The word "sexually" dramatically changes the factual nature of this sentence. Why is it in brackets? Did he say it or not?
/r/MensRights28/01/19 08:15 PM
5

I'm sure there are plenty of waste management companies who would be happy to provide her with a manager.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 04:44 PM
24

He actually was convicted of manslaughter and not murder according to the article. Bad OP.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 03:45 PM
41

Here's how it works. Oppression goes into the victim group's Discrimination Account. Later, it is to be spent by members of the group who were never oppressed, on behalf of their ancestors, against those who look like they might be descendants of dead former oppressors (but only local oppressors -- those who committed atrocities in other countries are not considered). This will cause them to roll over in their graves and we'll all feel warm and fuzzy.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:43 PM
1

Yep. Bigender means the person identifies as both male and female.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 08:55 PM
2

I know this 4-year old who can't urinate normally because he had a botched circumcision. He's lucky. Some of these poor saps have much bigger problems. Thank God @DrChaya came around so I can let him know he shouldn't be such a pussy.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:03 PM
2

What's amazing about it is how many people believe it despite how obvious it is that it's bullshit. Just read the front page of the tinder subreddit and you'll encounter half a dozen instances of rule 1 and 2. Look, we're all beautiful in our own way, but unless you take care of your body, you will be less attractive, and that's going to make your life harder even if you're not an aspiring model or actor.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 05:05 AM
2

Personally, this one feels to me like it's the most obvious and ought to be the easiest to get people on your side. If I was writing a first article, I'd want to start with something very palatable. I would definitely stay away from domestic violence and any other topic that is already deeply entrenched in peoples' minds as a women's issue. If someone stands up against "let's not cut parts off of our babies for no reason anymore" then it should be obvious to you and your other readers that that …
/r/MensRights31/10/18 05:51 PM
1

Sorry, Barack! I'll try and do better.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 07:07 PM
1

According to the video, they are moving forward with the charge of disposing of her baby. The dropped charge is that she didn't seek assistance during childbirth.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 03:19 PM
3

Michael Kimmel I found the problem.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 10:39 PM
1

What strikes me most about these arguments is the dismissive tone. If someone said these things to me, we'd have to have a conversation about basic respect before we could hope to productively address any of the above topics.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 10:22 PM
8

Mens rights is just what we have in common. It doesn't make us the same.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 06:58 PM
22

That is a mighty broad brush you're painting us with.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 06:57 PM
1

Imagine the psychological effects this has on a violent person. As long as you're having a genuine reaction, the law will back you up. Terrifying.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 09:43 PM
38

Thus, saying “all men are scum” would be, technically, against Facebook’s policy. Technically. Oh, those pedants, they'll getcha.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 03:46 AM
9

Not to mention, Google is not just any monopoly. It is, quite literally, humanity's primary source of information.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 06:44 PM
131

How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and how hard it is to undo that work again! Mark Twain
/r/MensRights23/01/18 04:14 PM
8

It's unfortunate, but the belief that men have deliberately exploited and suppressed women to their own advantage throughout history is a very effective psychological justification for doing the inverse.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 10:22 PM
34

But in my eyes the most important point the movie made is, that just because you go and make aware of problems in laws or society that affact men, doesn't make you a "Women hater". I don't think that's the most important point, but I'm here to agree regardless -- women like Cassie Jaye and Karen Straughan are heroes for, as Karen put it in one of her videos, "giving men moral permission" (and I don't remember the exact quote, so I'm paraphrasing the rest) to attack feminism and expose it for the…
/r/MensRights10/01/18 05:05 PM
12

I strongly suspect the author doesn't even know the owner's gender. This is extremely important -- they are simply reporting the information they have.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 05:12 PM
2

Either through bloodshed, disease, or some other catastrophe How about widespread male homelessness as a result of unemployment due to all the dangerous, difficult, manual jobs (which only men are under sufficient pressure to do) increasingly being done by machines?
/r/MensRights15/12/17 08:09 PM
1

Can't we just make a single ribbon with both colors? It really doesn't seem that complicated to me.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 01:28 AM
1

As a cultural minority, we are more or less obligated to be respectful even when those who oppose us are not.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 05:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter