TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ksflksd Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by ksflksd on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
24

America is also doing a mass "voluntary" circumcision campaign in Africa to supposedly combat HIV. It is truly sick.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 09:52 PM
6

Are you sure you're not misunderstanding their argument? Because it doesn't make sense. Personally I wouldn't rely too much on the deaths argument because we don't have much reliable data. Doctors are obviously loathe to attribute death to a completely unnecessary surgery, so will list "blood loss" or whatever. The study that found 100 deaths per year was done by an intactivist without any scientific expertise, if I'm not mistaken.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 08:58 PM
90

Please have her watch a video of one being done. No amount of arguments and articles are more eloquent than seeing and hearing what it actually is.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 02:47 AM
10

Men have a great psychological need to see their penis as good and desirable. A mutilated thing does not sound good and desirable. Therefore they either reject premise that circumcision is a mutilation, or they sacrifice the comfort of thinking their penis is desirable and good. Which is easier?
/r/MensRights30/09/20 08:49 PM
3

Given that every culture which practices fgm also practices circumcision, aren't they about equally as common?
/r/MensRights30/09/20 06:21 PM
11

The foreskin is a functional and pleasurable part of the penis. If there is no medical issue necessitating its removal then individuals should be allowed to decide whether they want it removed or not. This is taken for granted for any other part of the body, but the male foreskin is a strange exception due to circumcision being an ancient religious ritual that became "medicalized" during a time when it was thought masturbation caused various illnesses and that circumcision would discourage mastu…
/r/MensRights13/09/20 07:06 PM
1

If Danish people want to do that, power to them. But for those of us in other countries I think it's arrogant to say they should bow to our pressure. It reminds me too much of what the ADL did when Iceland was considering a circumcision age restriction. We have the moral right on our side and don't need to threaten and blackmail.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 06:28 PM
-3

I think we should think of it as supporting them rather than pressuring them. We all value human rights and Denmark is showing courage in at least attempting to stand up for them. They're getting plenty of "pressuring" from religious hard-liners who are using shaming and guilt tactics.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 05:58 PM
2

I don't understand what you're trying to say. Circumcision and vaccination are not similar in any way.
/r/MensRights26/08/20 09:37 PM
3

When pushing against something that has become a societal norm, you will be viewed as inappropriate by many. Has no bearing on whether you a morally right or wrong. See slavery, women's suffrage etc...
/r/MensRights26/08/20 06:21 PM
18

"Male celebrity prefers women get their beef flaps trimmed, preferably without their consent". I wonder how that article would go down.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 02:10 AM
6

"Genital mutilation is something those savage Africans do. We just snip the excess skin off the penis so it's cleaner and healthier."
/r/MensRights27/07/20 09:06 PM
8

It is against the law to cut up the genitals of a female child. I'm sure you instinctively know why, even if some quack were to tell you it's "cleaner" or "healthier". Those laws should be gender neutral instead of protecting only one sex from permanent and unnecessary surgery.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 02:07 AM
9

Infections are not common in the majority of the world that doesn't practice circumcision. Girls have higher UTI rates than boys yet we treat them sensibly with antibiotics, not genital surgery.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 05:31 AM
13

It wouldn't even be a question if the child weren't male. In every other instance except circumcision, surgery is done only if there is a severe risk to not doing it, or if the patient specifically requests it. People only waffle about on circumicision's obvious cruelty and senselessness because "I already had it done to me/did it to my child, so there must be some good reason for it."
/r/MensRights20/07/20 11:38 PM
5

Very good graphic. Covers the reasons that I am afraid to ever speak about my own feelings.
/r/MensRights12/07/20 05:44 PM
18

That aggression can also take the form of insisting how much they don't care and what a non-issue it is. Or taking the guise of being ultra rational by googling any pro-circumcision research they can find, pasting links, and insisting it is entirely a "medical" and "scientific" issue divorced of any moral or emotional component. When pressed, you'll find most of these people are deeply invested in maintaining the illusion that circumcision is somehow beneficial or at the very least neutral. Ther…
/r/MensRights12/07/20 05:32 PM
4

Is wonder what the ratio of circumcision to fgm is within Europe? I understand neither are widespread, but I suspect circumcision is far more so based on world rates.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 01:39 AM
30

People who do bring it up are met with: "stop derailing! They are totally different issues and fgm is so much worse!" This is like a religious mantra - no amount of reasoned argument will stop it from being repeated. People want to exclude men from the topic of genital mutilation even though men are more likely to be victims of it by an order of magnitude. I can't stand when white women, whose genitals are protected by law, lecture and shame me about not understanding genital mutilation. I fucki…
/r/MensRights26/06/20 06:21 PM
8

baby boys turn into men. so even though it may hinder many men it has helped many men. You keep saying circumcision has "helped many men". Aside from that being true or not, I can also say that mastectomies have "helped many women" who otherwise may have died from breast cancer. Yet does that give a doctor the right to cut the breasts off a healthy patient without her consent? if i smash a window and blame you how is that your fault? you didn't smash it? i consented to smash it. Dude what are yo…
/r/MensRights14/06/20 09:49 PM
6

doctors take the hypocratic oath Which famously says "first, do no harm". Cutting body parts off a perfectly healthy patient who has not requested it is obvious harm. the consent form explains the risks to the parents and then the parents read and sign it if they choose to. Surgery should not be offered in the first place unless the child has severe deformity or illness. A healthy penis does not come close to meeting those criteria. circumsion has helped many men We aren't talking about men with…
/r/MensRights14/06/20 09:32 PM
8

don't blame the doctors becuase it was your parents that consented. The doctor needs to be out their helping people. he/she didn't do anything wrong unless you are David Reimer. No, a supposed expert in the workings of the human body should absolutely know basic male anatomy. They are far more to blame than parents who do not have that knowledge by default.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 09:09 PM
4

Also the reason behind the snip of my tip was medical so that probably has something to do with my misunderstanding. There you go. 99% of the time it's done for no medical reason at all. As a general rule, people like to keep from cutting parts of their body off permanently unless there is a legitimate medical problem. And even in that case, they prefer to to make the decision themselves or at least be consulted. Since this is being done on the most personal and private part of the body, then ye…
/r/MensRights30/03/20 03:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter