TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kulkija Archive

View 1 post and 89 comments by kulkija on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
21

kulkija/r/MensRights14/02/13 01:14 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Steroids are actually very common. A lot of people in the weightlifting scene would not consider them extreme at all.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 12:36 AM
2

It's almost as if similar crimes have been committed since then.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 03:53 PM
7

Aziz Shavershian died because of an existing heart defect that was exacerbated by steroids. His appearance is somewhat more attainable and natural-looking, but that is simply because he died before he could get further along the path he was walking. There are hundreds of bodybuilders, actors, models, pro wrestlers and so on who have died trying to achieve the proportions we see in comic books and magazine covers. Andreas Münzer died because he had slowly destroyed his internal organs over the co…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 03:43 PM
3

The fact that this screencap exists means the guy basically has a case set in stone. Honestly, even with court bias, my money's on the guy this time.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 11:34 PM
1

I am a man who has been raped, and I find trigger warnings to be kind of offensive. The last thing I need is to be infantilized and treated differently because of my past experiences - kid gloves are not always the way to go.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 09:44 PM
2

Well, this is interesting. Apparently it hasn't been brought to court in Nevada, though similar rulings for different establishments have ruled in favour of men. It's illegal in Cali, New York, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Unfortunately, many states are still lightyears behind, and some explicitly approve of lower prices for women, even in government-owned facilities and events.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 03:46 PM
2

It is undeniably discriminatory though. It's illegal in many countries, and many states too. I'm pretty sure it's legal in Nevada though.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 03:21 PM
1

I get what you're trying to say, but I think you're reaching a bit. Particle theory has a lot of unique technical terms because it is incredibly complicated; it involves things which, when they were discovered, we literally had no words to describe. I won't dispute that there's a lot of professional exclusion in highly technical fields with a lot of jargon, but you can't claim that gender theory has jargon because it's too technical to describe without jargon. It has jargon because women's studi…
/r/MensRights30/01/14 05:09 AM
2

Honestly, I agree because of all the unique jargon they use. The ideas themselves are not that crazy, but gender theory employs a lot of terminology that is literally never used anywhere else. I suppose it serves to make the proponents of the idea feel like a special club - but, in fairness, cults and radical political movements employ the exact same strategy. It helps keep their members in an "us-versus-them" mentality.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 12:00 AM
5

Maybe you're not, but the majority of the sub definitely is.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 07:25 PM
27

Honestly, I have no problem with action figures and super heroes having unattainable bodies. They're supposed to represent iconic, unattainable ideals in their personalities too. The whole idea is not "feel bad if you're not this", it's "feel good because Superman is an awesome unstoppable force of righteousness"
/r/MensRights26/01/14 07:17 PM
0

It's a bit of both. Feminists do a strange about-face when it comes to prison rape. If a man gets raped in prison, suddenly it's his fault for committing a crime. Obviously he must be a homosexual too, and a pedophile. Now that he's been raped, he's more likely to become a rapist himself. I wish these weren't actual things I've heard, but they are. They blame the victim, making accusations that imply the victim wanted it and / or deserved it. What you're seeing is the weird feminist switch from …
/r/MensRights24/01/14 01:42 PM
3

I don't want to downplay how extortionistic this is, but I want to be fair; this guy made a very, very bad legal decision by not going through official channels.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 06:55 AM
17

Married rapists are still rapists.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 01:48 PM
1

Yes, yes, they're mixed economies, but I honestly think there's little difference between calling them "socialistic forms of capitalism" or "capitalistic forms of socialism" Anyways, if you actually want to dispel ignorance, I suggest you talk to Mr. "SOCIALISTS ARE HIJACKING AMERICA" above.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 01:15 PM
2

What do you mean? Scandinavia is pretty much purely social democracies. It's not exactly a bad thing either
/r/MensRights19/01/14 05:27 PM
5

Except that they aren't actually socialists. Sweden and Norway are socialist. America's Democrats are just demand-side capitalists, rather than supply-side.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 03:19 PM
6

When a reasonable person wouldn't believe there are dire consequences for not going along with the demand, I would say it's no longer coercion. There are already gender-neutral legal provisions for this. IMO, including special clauses for abusive SO's effectively makes the "sympathy card" into law - and as you know, when people play the sympathy card in court, women tend to win and men tend to lose.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 03:00 PM
15

I hope you are being sarcastic. Legislation that eliminates personal responsibility is highly inappropriate for both men and women. Unless people are truly being coerced, say, with the threat of violence, they should always be held accountable for their actions.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 02:44 PM
3

You should have gotten into D&D. Heheh
/r/MensRights12/01/14 07:29 PM
3

No, that means a minimum of 25% were falsely accused, and had enough evidence to prove that they were not guilty. Unfortunately, these days courts often treat the accused as guilty-until-proven-innocent when it comes to rape allegations. It's likely there are many outside the 25% who were falsely convicted, and probably some inside the 25% who were falsely exonerated, but I doubt a DoJ study could clear it up beyond making a well-informed estimate.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 04:16 AM
37

Because the post is a quote about feminism?
/r/MensRights10/01/14 12:38 PM
1

I went through something similar a number of years back. PM me if you want someone to talk to about it.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 01:50 PM
1

The first statement can be anything though, even a negative. I suspect his point was more along the lines that "No feminists are for equality" I know feminists who are also egalitarian, and pointed this out. His response was to say they're clearly not feminists then. Kinda cut and dried, IMO.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:45 PM
8

You misunderstand. I'm not disagreeing that feminism has made a negative impact on men's rights overall. I'm just saying that it's a fallacy to claim that feminists who support men's rights aren't feminists. Honestly, they're incredibly important allies to have, and we shouldn't be alienating them by trying to tell them what to call their ideology.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 05:35 PM
33

That's not feminism. You're using the No True Scotsman fallacy. It's a pain in the ass when feminists claim that MRA's are all rape apologists - and if someone points out an MRA who isn't, they claim "Oh, well that's not an MRA" There are reasonable feminists; they just don't dominate public discourse, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 05:02 PM
13

If it's ambiguous, why did you assume /u/Pecanpig meant it in the most offensive way possible, then comment on this assumed meaning? You know, instead of asking?
/r/MensRights29/12/13 09:51 PM
3

I don't know how carefully you read the comments here, but we're not exactly shouting "censor this filth!" Denouncing double standards and male disposability is kind of central to the MRM. From what I understand, the people objecting to this film are not offended that free artistic expression exists, but that misandry and female-on-male violence are so broadly accepted. I won't lie, it bothers me that the attitudes in this film are so common. It bothers me that a big-budget film like this can ma…
/r/MensRights22/12/13 02:21 PM
5

If there were a movie about three dudes who poison and beat the shit out of a cheating woman, it would really not be okay. This isn't okay either.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 02:00 PM
36

It's from a journal he kept, later included in his autobiography. Evil comes to us men of imagination wearing as its mask all the virtues. I have certainly known more men destroyed by the desire to have wife and child and to keep them in comfort than I have seen destroyed by drink and harlots.Extract 38 (p. 328) Took me 3 seconds to find with Google. Next time you are skeptical, try that first.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 03:42 PM
2

hole based economy So, uhh, like Vegas? Or Thailand?
/r/MensRights12/11/13 04:57 AM
7

...and I would really prefer it if people didn't hit me, so I don't hit them. I understand where you're coming from, but I'm not an eye for an eye kind of guy, and I don't think it's even remotely pathetic to turn the other cheek.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 01:30 AM
5

I am really not sure if you're trolling. All I can say is that disagreement is not "descending into an abyss of untruths"
/r/MensRights31/10/13 01:21 AM
4

Some men don't let their self-respect depend on hitting people in the face. I sure don't.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 01:12 AM
11

You smack the fucking bitch in the fucking face. You will get kicked out by the bouncers and arrested for doing this. Sometimes the only winning strategy is to leave.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 01:10 AM
10

Go ahead man - I'm all ears.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:20 PM
13

You sure you aren't just repeating what the feminists say about men who get raped? They really do love to victim-blame when the victim is a guy, underage or no. The three guys she interviewed went to reporters because they couldn't go to police. That's putting a very shame-filled part of your life on public display for the sake of advocacy and awareness. IMO, it takes some cajones.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:18 PM
29

Hey now. I am the "Ben" mentioned in the article. I can tell you firsthand that it happens, it matters, and that it is absolutely not "nonsense" False accusations are a terrible thing - they can ruin lives as surely as rape can. Obviously it is important to continue raising awareness of it, and campaign for fair treatment of the accused. However, that does not mean we should further vilify and marginalize male rape victims. They have it bad enough from the feminists already - we don't need that …
/r/MensRights30/10/13 09:59 PM
5

Or, just, you know, the English language. Some people prefer to use "his" instead of "their" when the gender is unspecified or otherwise unknown.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 08:45 PM
-2

80 percent tax, lulz.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 12:44 PM
5

Honestly, serious as cancer is, I think a funny campaign would be more memorable - and thus more successful. Same deal with Movember - I think it's such a success because a sudden, massive profusion of handlebar mustaches is pretty funny.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 06:29 PM
10

It's not even that hard to check. Campaign for it could be hilarious too. "Play with your balls erryday. Seriously though, you could die if you don't."
/r/MensRights28/10/13 12:17 PM
10

Feeling of tightness or pain in the chest Pain in the arms, neck, back, or jaw Sweating Shortness of breath Stomachache, nausea They're actually very similar, it's just that not many people know that neck pain can mean a heart attack.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 12:14 PM
5

I think the general feminist assumption is that if anything is not specifically "for women", then it's "for men" - even if it is really and truly for everyone. Non-gendered heart disease campaign? That's for men. Walk-in clinics? For men. Entire health care system? Yep. Men. Without a ludicrous amount of extra resources (typically an "equal" amount to the "men only" services), feminists see this as oppression.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 12:10 PM
7

This is because of feminist stereotyping of the MRM. This exists in Calgary, as it exists everywhere, but it doesn't mean there is no one involved with the MRM here.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 09:08 PM
4

no one who cares Don't be so sure - I'm a Calgarian, been coming to this sub for a while now. Know quite a few people who are sympathetic to the MRM too.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 07:14 PM
10

I don't think anyone can achieve peace with a 4-year-old.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 11:27 PM
2

coughcoughThatchercough Sorry, it's a bit dusty in here.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 11:26 PM
3

I was showered in them by the feminists on my Facebook when I posted the link to said story. There are some pretty naïve folk out there. It's fair to say OP was exaggerating for emphasis, but I have to point out that you defended similar exaggeration when it's employed by feminists. Makes your argument seem a little solipsistic.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 11:20 PM
1

Yep. Locked in and nowhere to go.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 10:01 PM
3

Actually, men report DV significantly less than women, mainly owing to the fact that female abusers are rarely arrested (Felson and Pare, (2007) p. 436), and that often male victims will be arrested instead (Hoyle, Carolyn; Young, Richard New Visions of Crime Victims(2002) pp. 94-96). Male victims of DV have very few resources at their disposal. Women have the police on their side, women's shelters, and a strongly favorable bias in the courts. Men are simply expected to suck it up and deal with …
/r/MensRights25/10/13 05:35 PM
1

I would not be surprised if this happened in Canada. The fact that this woman thought to report it speaks volumes about what we will try to prosecute here.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 03:52 PM
5

This is not true. DV affects both men and women. 27% of cases are perpetrated by men only, 24% by women only, and 49% of cases involve mutual violence. I would ask you to do your research before you dismiss half the victims of a violent crime, but I suspect you're not open to changing your mind.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 01:03 PM
13

Technically it's Google's users that stereotype men. Their suggestions correspond to the most common queries by other people who typed the same thing. Just kind of goes to show how pervasive these stereotypes are, though.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 02:11 AM
9

Canadian here. I'm sorry for my country's behaviour.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 01:56 AM
1

There is no link.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 02:27 PM
1

I don't know about that - Pavlichenko even gave Zaytsev a run for his money. Zaytsev had about 4 total kills for every 3 of Pavlichenko's, but Pavlichenko took down more than 3 times as many enemy snipers. The USSR also made good use of female pilots. There are many military roles, even combat-oriented ones, that women can fulfill as proficiently as men. Just, you know, not infantry.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 12:29 AM
1

Reporting in. But I'm Albertan, so it doesn't count.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 12:17 AM
1

In Canada, not so much.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 04:48 PM
5

Feminism has never been specific to the left in Canada, even from the beginning. The majority of the Famous Five were right-leaning; they included the first female judge, who supported eugenics and blazed the trail for the modern day war on drugs. Also among the five was the first female provincial MLA in the British Empire, elected in opposition to the Liberals. The first federal MLA was elected immediately after constitutional reforms enacted by the Conservatives. I don't know what province yo…
/r/MensRights23/10/13 04:44 PM
25

Canadian here. Looooots of right-wing feminists in this country. Feminism is not unique to or even typical of the left. Well, in Canada at least. Could be a different situation in the States.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 01:08 PM
1

Actually, eating as much protein as the average bodybuilder does is extremely hard on your liver and kidneys. Add to that the fact that they also starve and dehydrate themselves down to <1% body fat on a regular basis for competitions, well... you can be in incredible shape, but still have some pretty nasty health problems as a result.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 12:20 AM
1

This is why anecdotes in general are unreliable. Everyone has confirmation bias.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 01:28 PM
2

Honestly, I would not reciprocate or even respond to her actions. It's likely she's trying to goad you into a confrontation. She obviously believes that people with different beliefs can't peacefully coexist, so you can irrefutably prove her wrong while doing nothing wrong yourself. Take the high road - leave her be.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 03:21 AM
6

Exactly. Just because she didn't write it doesn't excuse her endorsement and spreading of it. It'd be like a pedophile defending the posting of child porn by saying "But... but... it's a repost!"
/r/MensRights18/10/13 12:22 AM
1

Whoosh.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:26 AM
3

This man speaks the truth. Meant it as an example of a place where it's pretty bad. I am making something of a claim, but it's based on my experience rather than one YouTube video. In the dozen or so major universities I've had experience with around the country, none had a reasonable, egalitarian Women's Studies faculty.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 03:35 PM
5

I've been to the U of Alberta, UBC, the U of Calgary, and MRU. I've spoken extensively with students from McGill, U Leth, U Vic, and Van Island U. I know this isn't even close to every university in Canada, but every single one that I've been to or dealt with here has a very actively misandric Women's Studies faculty. There is a pattern, and the pattern is that a faculty like Women's Studies ends up being an insular echo chamber that radicalizes its members very easily.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 03:26 PM
11

Pretty much every Canadian university is brimming with violently radical women's studies majors.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 05:12 AM
3

Calgarian here. Unfortunately I am not surprised.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 04:58 AM
2

I think it's hilarious how offensive the term "mansplaining" is. Imagine the shitstorm that would ensue if you told a lass she was "womansplaining"
/r/MensRights11/10/13 01:59 PM
15

You're talking as if these higher-paying jobs are unavailable to women. They are not - they just entail hard physical labour and lots of overtime, and most female dropouts would prefer to work at Starbucks.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 01:29 AM
3

Same boat as me brother. Sleep-rape victim fistbump.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 01:33 AM
2

I've been raped by a woman, yes. TL;DR Crazy ex broke into my house, legs all slashed up, and went to town while I was asleep. When I woke up, covered in her blood, she told me she'd kill herself if I didn't have sex with her. That was lovely.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 01:31 AM
1

Actually, no - the common myth that it stunts your growth isn't actually true. (Source) The cigarettes thing is really awful though.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 12:18 PM
8

Right, first off, it sounds like the club doesn't have a problem with discussing MR so much as they have a problem endorsing MR. This is a crucial difference. I mean, your Men's Rights topic got voted to the top in the discussion. Anything is on the table there, and that's good. That said, I can't imagine a free thought club would want to endorse any ideology at all. That would kind of go against their prerogative, wouldn't it?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:09 PM
1

That's a fair point, but I think we could probably draw the line at a loss that would actually get noticed or mentioned by one's sexual partners. I think there's a reason sex advice columns talk about things like "deathgrip" affecting sexual performance, but not circumcision.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 04:58 PM
1

I am aware, hence my decrying of traditional methods. Had you read my above post you would know that I have done my research.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 02:32 AM
1

It's hardly necessary to ask. Locker rooms are a thing, and circumcised men have a different gait - and beside all that, statistics are a thing as well. I have known perhaps 500 men in my life, and I know that in my region, roughly 60-70% of my generation is circumcised. None of them, not one, has mentioned their lack of a foreskin in a negative light. When I have broached the topic, of all the men I know, they simply don't give a shit about whether or not they're circumcised.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 02:29 AM
2

some rape victims recover and move on quite easily. that does not work as a n argument for banning rape That is completely irrelevant. I am not arguing for the legalization of rape. Besides, all of the above are extremely cut and dry. Rape and assault are not accepted cultural practices anywhere, because they obviously cause lasting harm to other people. I'm not saying circumcision is without trauma, but where do you draw the line? Cutting the umbilical? Piercing young girls' ears? Giving infant…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 02:23 AM
2

Also, you shouldn't extrapolate your experience and handling of it to all circumcised people. Of course, that's why I said things like "to me", and "I personally" and "I think" and "I feel"", and "in my experience" You, sir, are disingenuously taking words out of my mouth. I am not saying circumcision has any benefits. I am not saying there is any legitimate reason to perform circumcision. I am not saying it is right to perform such a procedure on an infant. I am not saying all circumcised men h…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 01:26 AM
8

Indeed, social acceptance is a factor. Plus, for me there's no sense of loss if I never had it to begin with - I feel the same way about having foreskin as I feel about having breasts. It's interesting to think about, but this is the way I am, so I'd prefer to focus on enjoying what I've got rather than bemoaning what I never had. I won't deny that my logic also applies to the milder forms of FGM as well. Obviously I agree that the only reasonable thing to do is to keep people intact and, you kn…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 12:35 AM
8

I don't mind getting downvoted - I understand that my opinion is considered controversial among MRA's, and I wouldn't have shared it if I were worried about losing internet points. Like I said, I personally wouldn't do it to my children because I think it's unnecessary. I also think it should only be performed by licensed medical professionals, and not religious leaders - the traditional method is unsanitary and, frankly, dangerous. In a perfect world, I think it shouldn't be performed at all, b…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 10:26 PM
10

The thing is, circumcised males are not all emotionally wounded as a result of it. In fact, I'd hazard that most of them don't really care. I am circumcised, and although I wouldn't do it to my children, I don't feel that I have been adversely affected by it at all. I have a healthy sex life; I have no difficulty achieving orgasm whether on my own or with a partner, and not once have any of my partners even mentioned the state of my foreskin. To me, it's a non-issue, and although I understand th…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 06:52 PM
1

These are primarily young, socially awkward, and frustrated women venting about how much they hate men. The new feminists. Dated a woman who turned out to be an SRSer - can confirm. For the first while, she basically acted like a normal human being, but then the worms started coming out of the woodwork. Six months in, she was always very angry, constantly looking for things to be offended by, lots of man-hate, frequently went on fantasy power-trips about crushing men's genitals, etc. If I were e…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 06:21 PM
5

Was going to say just that. She's still on the hook for murder, and the article doesn't sound sympathetic at all. It's a sordid story, and it reads like one.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 12:33 AM
13

This, a thousand times this. It's an awful double-standard that MRA's really should bring to light more often.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 05:14 PM
24

Actually, erections can be entirely involuntary without prostate simulation. I would know from experience. (Copy + pasted from a previous post of mine in AskMen) ...a woman can physically rape a man. I have been raped by a woman. I'd recently ended a relationship with an abusive woman; she tried to control who my friends were, what I believed, what I spent my time doing, and what I spent my money on. She used self-harm, suicide threats, and physical violence to get her way, although she only res…
/r/MensRights06/02/13 05:12 PM
1

Evolutionary imperative.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 08:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter