TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kurokabau Archive

View 3 posts and 483 comments by kurokabau on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
22

She was pretty chill tbh.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/17 06:23 PM
1

Alternatively, since they're a bazillionaire there is a lot more public eye on them and will be a lot more hate directed to him because of it.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/17 08:58 AM
36

Safe space policy...
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/15 04:09 PM
0

Why would the prefer mixed hour? Because YOU don't want it.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/15 01:31 PM
6

ok?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/15 08:34 AM
1

justiceporn, not pussypassdenied.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/15 10:49 AM
-2

I enjoyed the first ones, but the orgasm, jap's eye, and miscarriage were in poor taste for a public place. Especially the miscarriage one. And still no one using a pussypass. Just an annoyed bystander.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/15 10:42 AM
55

This bot exists?! Way to fight the Murdoch power bot.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/15 06:35 PM
1

How many times did he have to warn her?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/14 10:20 AM
-3

Where would i read that?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/14 09:41 PM
-12

Yeah. I think it basically moves along his face, but there was no force there. It was a bit over the line teasing. Outrageous response from him.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/14 02:50 PM
3

To be fair, the people were quite reasonable too. Everyone was talking pretty calmly and when she was gonna get cuffed, she accepted it.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/14 02:40 PM
0

Errrr, how hard did she actually hit him with the shoe?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/14 02:31 PM
1

I just wanna know when i'm free to leave to be honest. If im required to stay i'd be happy to but i do feel as those police can deliberately make it seem like you're not allowed to go when I am. It would also make these videos more enjoyable if I knew when they are and aren't allowed to go. If you stop to answer, you are detaining yourself. Better? haha, now i'm more confused. OK, what is it called when i'm being forced to stay? I think the UK might be more strict in this sense, i think they're …
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/14 01:47 PM
2

Fair enough, you'll see me complying at point 2 then. Just to be sure I don't have an option in the matter. if you are not walking away from the cops at that very moment... you are being detained. Isn't detained where you're not allowed to leave? If not, at what point am I arrested? willingly submitted to detention Do you mean: complied with their tell of detention? Willingly submitted sounds like they weren't actually forcing you to but you said you're fine with it? I'm from the UK btw so maybe…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/14 01:16 PM
11

The cop kinda mutters 'shit' to himself quietly after he punches her. He seems upset with himself for doing it. Maybe it was excessive (i personally think it was) but she did resist arrest and did kick out, hope he doesn't get disciplined.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/14 12:08 PM
2

Sooo, would I be a douche if i refused until they resorted to number 3? Or are the cuffs out at this point at number 2? Once I see cuffs, there isn't any other scenario where i'm not being detained right but am cuffed?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/14 12:04 PM
3

What's the difference between Tell and Order?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/14 11:39 AM
6

Can we us archive for these kind of posts? I don't wanna click an article that is going to be fucking horrendous and give them ad revenue/clicks.
/r/PussyPass07/11/14 02:00 PM
3

He's 6! He doesn't even know what sex is.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 12:24 PM
1

suspicion he HAD a gun. They didn't think he might have a gun, he actually had it.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 05:27 PM
-6

If boys are expelled for chewing pop tarts in the shape of a gun, imagine if one finds a gun in his backpack with the only thing he can say in his defense is, "I don't know how it got there, officer, I swear!" Hang on, one of those should be an expulsion offence. A zero tolerance to bringing guns into school isn't the worse thing in the world. Obviously the pop tart thing is ridiculous but that's nothing to do with this situation. Remember that in this case, McKeegan was 100% innocent. And the c…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 05:04 PM
2

She tried to get a boy railroaded by a zero tolerance system that is predominantly - if not only - used against young men. Is that because they're male, or because mostly males have guns though? Is there evidence men and women are treating differently on this zero tolerance policy? I don't actually know this policy though because i'm not american. Had she not confessed, there's a good chance he would have spent the rest of his life either in prison or in a "mental health" facility. Is that relev…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 04:28 PM
5

Why is this posted here? "Woman commits and crime and is sentenced accordingly"
/r/MensRights31/10/14 04:11 PM
21

"What you doing hitting a girl"? Proceeds to punch a child in the face
/r/PussyPass31/10/14 03:25 PM
2

I don't like mondays
/r/MensRights25/10/14 02:41 PM
1

The Daily Fascist
/r/MensRights20/10/14 03:50 PM
0

so when people moan to vogue about using anorexic women in their ads which harm young children's body image, we shouldn't be upset about that because it's just a symptom and is from a private company? This ad shows society's perception of how we treat men and women. It is an example of what needs to be changed, if we allow these ads to keep running then how are we gonnna change that perception? But please enlighten me, what's the real cause we should fight?
/r/MensRights08/10/14 10:15 AM
-1

Society perceives violence against men for humour is ok but violence against women for humour is not ok. What don't you get?
/r/MensRights08/10/14 10:08 AM
1

The point is. Just because they're willing doesn't make it OK. As society we have dictated in American the child can't make such a decision under 18. That's the law regardless of how willing they are.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 10:56 PM
1

Can 8 year olds consent? Y'know, what if they were 'willing'?
/r/MensRights03/10/14 12:33 PM
0

source?
/r/MensRights02/10/14 08:42 AM
2

Seems like a pretty good case to me..
/r/MensRights02/10/14 08:42 AM
-3

Getting an abortion is going to be a horrible experience.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 08:40 AM
-1

What's the maximum sentence for battery? I actually dont think it is attempted murder though. I wanna see her go down for decades though.
/r/PussyPass01/10/14 03:09 PM
1

She may just be ignorant on the topic. The 80$ thing has been shoved down the general publics throats for a while now, maybe she just generally doesn't know there's an alternative view to why that's happened?
/r/MensRights23/09/14 12:44 PM
3

narcissistic attention whores. this is why people don't like us.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 12:37 PM
6

"I don't feel safe with him", just because you don't like him, doesn't mean you don't feel safe.
/r/PussyPass22/09/14 08:33 AM
-3

I don't know California law, it's the law in the UK that rape victims have the right to anonymity. I thought the US had the same law.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 04:04 PM
-2

No. But that information should be shared in court.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 02:49 PM
8

I.e if a doctor was accused of raping his patient it makes sense to publish his name so other victims could potentially join the prosecution, who were previously too intimidated thinking they would not be believed. If the doctor is accused, then his name should be kept secret until he is charged. If he is charged with rape, that means they have enough evidence to actually go to trial, before then all they have is 'he said she said'. Announcing a name before, in he hope to gather more evidence is…
/r/MensRights19/09/14 02:06 PM
29

Technically until he is cleared she is still the 'victim'. And rape victims aren't allowed to be named. The paper would only legally be allowed to report her name once he is cleared, and even then not unless she is actually convicted of fabrication because she is still a supposed 'victim'.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 10:06 AM
10

years of back child support when he was unaware that a child even existed This is the current law though, I don't agree with it, but this is regularly enforced. My issue is that the police aren't going after a known criminal! They have his age, they have the paternity test, its like 99% fullproof she's a pedophile. There shouldn't have to be a 'he needs to press charges', they should arrest her right now and put her infront of a judge.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 12:18 PM
19

I was pretty riled up but then, "According to state law, parents like Olivas have to pay up unless the person seeking child support has been found guilty of sexual assault with a minor or sexual assault." So.. if he presses charges (and proves to be true which wouldn't take much due to simple math), then he won't have to pay? Isn't that exactly what the law should be?
/r/MensRights05/09/14 08:38 AM
16

What's your solution? Let him get out of being a dad? Yes.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 08:35 AM
2

I'm not saying more men are campaigning on women's rights than women. I'm saying more men are campaigning on women's rights than men's rights.
/r/PussyPass27/08/14 04:50 PM
2

I guess I wonder also why I don't see more men fighting for women's issues? There are a LOT of male feminists. I'd wager there are more male feminists than MRAs. I genuinely believe there are more men campaigning on women's rights than men's rights.
/r/PussyPass27/08/14 10:52 AM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/PussyPass/comments/2e8f6h/from_19972007_men_were_roughly_10x_more_likely/cjxfmoi Confirmed to be about gender bias.
/r/PussyPass22/08/14 03:17 PM
3

Perfect, thank-you. Wasn't trying to call you out, just didn't want to read it all to check! That couples thing is shocking.
/r/PussyPass22/08/14 03:16 PM
3

Anecdotally I know very few women that buy it straight from a dealer. They usually get it off their male friends.
/r/PussyPass22/08/14 12:37 PM
5

It's a long read. Can you just confirm that it's 10x more likely to be arrested after being caught, rather than men having 10x more often?
/r/PussyPass22/08/14 08:31 AM
2

I meant how you've called it a bottle of win, rather than a bottle of wine.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 09:38 PM
1

And there was a lot of alcohol abuse with awkward situations like chugging an entire bottle of win I lol'd
/r/MensRights20/08/14 08:35 AM
1

I no longer ever want to get married. I just don't see the point now, all I see is a thousand risks that could ruin my life.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 09:18 AM
5

Guardian columnist sigh
/r/MensRights15/08/14 08:48 AM
8

that glass seemed pretty flimsy?
/r/PussyPass30/07/14 05:23 PM
3

Not sexist, but your comment was nice.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 08:10 AM
1

I disagree I think the implication is clearly because there is more men than women. Otherwise he wouldn't have phrased it as such with 'male dominated culture' which is often cited in this way. He could've easily have phrased it more gender neutral if that was truly what he meant. This is still just one guy who is defending his client so i'm really not that arsed about it.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 10:08 AM
1

"You'll see more sexual harassment cases in Silicon Valley because of the male dominated culture," said Mathew Da Vega, a lawyer representing Shi. He acknowledged this particular case is different because it involves two women. I can't tell if he's saying: There'll be more sexual harassment because there's more men there, or because of the type of culture men bring with them.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 07:41 AM
4

What's the issue?
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:46 PM
1

More than 731. They could be from 1-3 years apart.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 07:15 AM
1

Seriously, no one wants you here on this sub. No one likes racists except other racists.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 11:09 PM
172

How there is any punishment at all for anyone amazes me. They're kids! They're 2 years apart, this is not what the law is for. No one is being protected here, and no one is a victim.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 05:51 PM
2

The good ones? Or the bad? I suspect both. Being a politician with the label of feminist basically means no one can attack you or your views, I think people struggle to create backlash against a feminist, or even a woman politician for that matter, because it's taboo and anyone working under that banner can get a lot of immediate support even with questionable positions.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 08:46 AM
1

Can you point me to the good side of todays MRAs? It's a silly question because as soon as you say 'this thing' there will be a rebuttal for it. Feminism has worked for different people, those people will see the good side. MRM is working for other people, and those people will see the good in that. How about feminism's work on improving girl's body image? Trying to get rid of the compulsion to be come size 00?
/r/MensRights03/07/14 08:43 AM
1

> "TheVTM" I don't know what that is. nevermind.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 08:39 AM
-1

Radfems just shout the loudest or get the most attention. No one moans about a regular feminist article, because it's no big deal. When a radfem shows up and writes something outrageous, we all get outraged and discuss it, thus giving it more time.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 11:55 PM
2

The point is, stop generalising a whole set of people of 'being like that'. It's unfair when people do it to us, its unfair when we do it to them. Criticise their general ideologies, but don't attack them on the actions of the minority.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 08:39 PM
4

You do realise thats basically what they were saying about the #notallmen? "half the m&m's being poisoned, so i wont eat any". You're using the exact same argument they were.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 07:43 PM
12

Was a joke. I'm saying, even though in the last 20 years there has been a clear and dramatic drop, it would probably be reported as that rape is actually higher than it was in 1974 and imply that we haven't done anything to prevent it.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:31 PM
9

Reported as "Rape has not dropped at all since 1970 ".
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:19 PM
3

Then we should only conclude only applies to 18-22 years olds and no further conclusions. 18-22 year old women are more likely to hit their partners then 18-22 year old men.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 07:37 PM
5

1000 isn't that small. If it was sampled properly. TV ratings are sampled from about 5'000 people.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 04:13 PM
4

Do you have citations?
/r/MensRights25/06/14 04:09 PM
2

I haven't read it, but if there is 'lack of evidence', then well, that's that. What more can they do? If they've ignored evidence then that's a different story.
/r/PussyPass23/06/14 04:07 PM
5

isn't this sub against the concept of 'victim blaming'? Yes. I mean, if you're going to parade your wealth in public and get intoxicated with seedy strippers who'll do anything to get money off you, then aren't you responsible for the situation you've put yourself in? The situation, yes. Those men should have covered their drinks to begin with. Probably Yeah, the strippers shouldn't have done it Yes but these men are clearly responsible for what happened to them. WTF?! No. The criminal is respon…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 12:41 PM
6

He's turning to the people that vilified his gender so much that the hotel he was staying at wouldn't believe he wasn't the violent one. Makes sense.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 10:41 AM
2

I don't expect any converts. I just think people will watch it, and have a good (i.e. not bad) experience with a prolific MRA. Doesn't have to be life-changing, or even be remember-able. Just interaction without having a negative outcome is a good thing. Gets people used to the idea of them being there, and gets used to them existing within their life which will subtly make being an MRA have less stigma. The more occasions the MRM is in the limelight without a negative connotation, just helps th…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:41 PM
1

He could have tried to be more convincing. Perhaps if it was more a 'debate' he would have? Do you not think people will have more of a good impression about the MRM rather than bad then from that segment?
/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:21 PM
17

I thought his lack of engagement was a good thing. He didn't come across as a bitter old man. If he had countered her points, he would have been countering issues women face, whereas instead he just pushed forward with the issues men face. He kept it about men's issues (with the frequent feminism blaming though) which was good. I wish he had better postures and wasn't quite so fat, just because overall appearance means a lot. But his attitude and responses were great. I myself didn't get the sen…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:07 PM
13

He came across very well. Calm, well thought out responses. Listing many facts and issues. His response to the 5% DV being found guilty was a perfect response. I think this definitely shed a good light on the MRA movement.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 01:34 PM
2

The factual thinkers vs the subjective interpreters.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 10:08 AM
2

Ah... would've been rage worthy if it was a genuine submission.
/r/PussyPass23/05/14 08:27 PM
1

What sub was it?
/r/PussyPass23/05/14 07:55 PM
17

If she's too unintelligent to be convicted of child abuse, then she's too unintelligent to look after her children.
/r/PussyPass23/05/14 03:08 PM
14

The woman, who cannot be named, Why not?! Judge O'Neill said the woman gave the boy alcohol, drugs and freedom, but that was not evidence of grooming or predatory behaviour. There's another crime in itself. The woman now has six children and Judge O'Neill said her family circumstances had to be taken into account in the sentence. There's the blatant pussypass.
/r/PussyPass23/05/14 03:04 PM
0

fuck me... I took a screenshot of what you wrote. I'm done here. You're just playing ignorant now.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 09:29 PM
0

Taking care of the home wasn't even included in your list. And it's what you excluded not included that's the problem. How do still not understand this? Do you know yours? I'll bet you don't. I'll bet you don't even have a place, which is why you try to tell others theirs. What you on about? You are telling her that's not the way it's supposed to be? Nope, i'm saying it's not the only thing she is good for.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 09:20 PM
0

"Who is upvoting this? These posts are what label /r/ MRAs as misogynists." I was talking about both your posts. And honestly, if she thinks those things are the only thing women are good for, then yes, she is a misogynist too. You can be racist against your own race, you can be sexist against your own sex. This shouldn't be hard to understand (well, maybe for you). Hell, son, I gave them much more utility than he did. Aww, what a nice man you are, don't worry women, you're also useful for sucki…
/r/MensRights21/05/14 09:00 PM
0

You response was misogynistic and was literally expanding on the original misogynistic comment. Seriously, are you a bit slow in the head? This conversation would make a lot more sense then.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 08:16 PM
0

Are you in denial or something?
/r/MensRights21/05/14 07:51 PM
1

Can you do one for ShitRedditSays? nevermind, i see you have a list.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 03:47 PM
3

Isn't it good to tell the website that this is good content by clicking it?
/r/MensRights21/05/14 03:20 PM
0

Traditionalism does not equate to being a misogynist no matter what you've been conditioned to believe. Small and limited government is not misogynistic either by the way... However, your comments like 'only good purposes for women' are extremely misogynistic and dismissive of women. You can try hide behind your wife all you want, but it appears you can't hide your true thoughts and feelings on the capabilities of women.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 01:14 PM
0

You're a moron. You've tried to say "well my gf dosen't think im a misogynist so there. Point proven". I wonder why that is just an awful argument... Its like saying "I'm not racist, I have a black friend". There's also no evidence that even happened. People like you, are what makes the men's right movement look like misogynistic far right assholes.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 12:55 PM
0

Oh does she? Oh shit, you've got me! Well played, you win this argument with that undeniably true, not fake, non-doctored second hand statement from "your woman".
/r/MensRights21/05/14 12:45 PM
1

nor ingrained prejudice against women my woman knows her place I honestly can't tell if you're a troll or someone who is genuinely just a misogynistic asshole anymore.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 12:35 PM
0

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/misogyny
/r/MensRights21/05/14 12:30 PM
1

Misogyny doesn't just mean hate. You're being blatantly prejudice against women.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 08:23 AM
1

Who is upvoting this? These posts are what label /r/ MRAs as misogynists.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 12:37 PM
0

I don't click buzzfeed articles. Any nice summary of it?
/r/MensRights20/05/14 12:36 PM
24

£500 !? But she was drunk and so can't be held responsible for any of the actions! God damn patriarchy forcing women to pay men for actions they can't control! ^^<sup>Just</sup> ^^<sup>in</sup> ^^<sup>case:</sup> ^^<sup>/s</sup>
/r/PussyPass20/05/14 10:13 AM
8

no one calls it 'reverse sexism' except for feminists.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 03:05 PM
11

I dunno, outside of AvfM and reddit I never see the MRM anywhere.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 05:14 PM
3

Seriously?! Fucking hell, that's atrocious.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 05:14 PM
3

This didn't get to air though I assume?
/r/MensRights02/05/14 04:05 PM
8

I don't mind this campaign, but why is 'bitch' there but words like dick aren't? Don't people call both genders these words now anyway?
/r/MensRights28/04/14 04:55 PM
8

I didn't think the art / STEM difference would be so blunt as this.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 04:51 PM
5

At least all the youtube commentators are against her. This doesn't seem to be a very popular opinion.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 08:31 AM
1

Bullshitter confirmed.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 07:44 AM
1

Im from the UK. Edit: But i don't mind, show me the american laws. I'm also going to bed now, but I will respond tomorrow.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 12:51 AM
1

Right, I think we both know now you've said something you shouldn't of. You've made a claim you know a law that means only men can't associate with who they want and have been called out on it. You can't back it up because it doesn't exist. You also make assumptions that just because someone holds a common feminist view it's ok to assume they're a feminist without any actual conclusive evidence. You're basically a tumblrina but for men's rights, making shit up and making assumptions. If you're n…
/r/MensRights23/04/14 12:40 AM
1

I'm looking for the law you specified which means only men are not allowed to associate with who they want. Please specify it.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 12:22 AM
1

As I clearly said earlier, I don't think the show is sexist. I just think it's without evidence to label the author as a feminist. Now please, tell me what law it is you speak of?
/r/MensRights23/04/14 12:05 AM
1

Seems false to me. Egalitarians might also argue that it's the right of an individual to be free to choose associations with others that they feel most comfortable with. Currently, the only group not allowed this right explicitly under the law is men. You're implying men, under law, are the only people who can't choose who they associate with. What law is this?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 11:56 PM
1

elaborate on what?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 11:50 PM
1

Right... nice one.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 11:38 PM
1

Currently, the only group not allowed this right explicitly under the law is men. hmm? Could you elaborate for me please?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 11:27 PM
1

Why do they have to belong to a group? Gender egalitarians may think that all single gender areas is sexist and that we should all be allowed in exactly the same places. It could be a guy or gal from a random tribe in south america for all we know. People don't have to be categorised into groups.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 11:13 PM
1

People who aren't a feminist can hold this view too.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 10:50 PM
1

If the statement that allowing all male spaces is sexist isn't feminist then we have entered a completely different era, because that was party line as far as i was aware up until a few hours ago. No one has said it isn't. Just because it is a feminist view doesn't mean the view is only held be feminists. If you're not arguing that the view is feminist so it is fair to assume the author is feminist then why have you jumped into a discussion discussing precisely that?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 10:49 PM
0

That comment wasn't, but this discussion is about whether the author is a feminist. You're saying the view is feminist but i'm saying it's irrelevant when guessing what the author is. I don't think the show is sexist. I just think it's without evidence to label the author as a feminist.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 09:32 PM
5

Be fair here, you can think something is sexist against women and not be a feminist. Just because feminists would probably think it is sexist, doesn't mean the people who think it is sexist are feminists.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 09:19 PM
8

Nah, it's just someone who genuinely has disdain for men.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 12:21 PM
1

She claimed but there was no evidence.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 07:43 AM
1

One man won't affect the median which is usually how the average wage is calculated.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 10:12 AM
2

I think there should be a separate sub for these posts. I get it's someone ignoring the men's issue in favour of pushing a feminist agenda. But one person's view on facebook isn't needed here.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 12:38 PM
4

Both could be true.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 12:36 PM
14

It's kinda relevant to pussypass in the sense she acted out thinking she'd get one?
/r/PussyPass05/04/14 09:24 AM
16

he should have stood his ground, and flinched FORWARD, as if to hit her again, to remind her what happened the last time she tried it. I think as a cop he needs to be seen to minimize violence though. He'd probably get in trouble if he was looking too aggressive after she is now a "distressed" person.
/r/PussyPass05/04/14 09:23 AM
5

It's an interview so he probably didn't have references and studies to hand to back up his claims. It doesn't mean it was made without basis though, Of course it doesn't mean it was made with basis either. But it would be harsh to dismiss his point entirely as an assertion without evidence since it was just a face to face discussion.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 01:35 PM
7

Good god, I should've known you'd be an obese chick as well. Good to know! Just an FYI: Fat chicks aren't pretty. They're not hot. They're not appealing. They're fat. Jeez dude...
/r/PussyPass25/03/14 11:51 PM
2

I dunno, I would have though so but perhaps you're right and it just qualifies as sexual assault.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 04:14 PM
8

I dunno, she may actually need psychiatric help. I hope people don't ask the husband for the money back though, it's not his fault and it looks like he's spent it on cribs n baby things.
/r/PussyPass25/03/14 03:14 PM
2

what about 'attempted rape'?
/r/MensRights25/03/14 03:09 PM
9

source?
/r/MensRights24/03/14 09:09 PM
3

Because women are self-entitled cunts who only care about themselves. wtf.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 01:22 PM
9

C'mon guys, it's one person's tweet. I think we need a separate sub for these kind of posts.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 08:31 PM
1

Ten teenage boys were arrested and charged after female schoolmates gave them explicit photos and videos of themselves that were later shared with other teens. That being said; The suspects, all aged between 13 and 15, were charged in youth court Thursday with producing, possessing and distributing child pornography. I think distribution should be the only one they are called up upon. And i hope for a lenient sentence since this is obviously not for what the law was intended for and it says it w…
/r/PussyPass19/03/14 04:19 PM
27

I think this kinda post should stay in TiA. Having an argument on tumblr with a teenage feminist doesn't seem like a very valuable post for this sub to me.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 10:20 PM
2

women aren't a minority.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 09:14 AM
2

I couldn't watch any further after this.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 11:19 AM
18

I'm with this approach. Call the police and film, if no one is under any personal danger, stay away.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 04:10 PM
8

There hasn't even been a sentence yet... This is just 'woman in jail for committing crime'.
/r/PussyPass01/03/14 10:11 PM
1

All jokes are ok, or none of them are.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 08:26 AM
-6

It's just a joke. It may bother you, but it probably shouldn't.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 09:25 PM
3

If they had said 'white only', would that have been allowed? Has there ever been a case?
/r/MensRights27/02/14 06:00 PM
6

Have you seen how frequent /r/feminism is with the ban hammer? Take a look in the mirror.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 12:52 AM
19

You think calling some women bitches is the same as hating or thinking less of all women? Nice one.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 09:04 PM
37

Do you know what a joke is?
/r/MensRights20/02/14 07:28 PM
2

But the only ones that did, were men. So it's not surprising that the majority of historical figures are men and not equally spread among the sexes.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 01:24 AM
3

I prefer to say 'the people in control, were men'. It's a small change, but it changes the interpretation a lot.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 09:22 PM
10

Well.. that and women weren't allowed to actually get an education for a lot of it.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 07:01 PM
2

My analogy fitted perfectly to what you said. I expanded a cohort to include people that would make the statistic less significant which is exactly what you have done. Statistic say 'teenagers are more likely to crash' (based on teenagers that can actually drive) but by expanding the sample range to include all teenagers ( including ones without cars or a licence) it makes the statistic look wrong, which is exactly what you've done. You're 'don't be worried, only 4% receive child support by sayi…
/r/MensRights15/02/14 03:42 AM
2

Anyone ages 15 and over is capable of receiving child support or alimony. No they're not. You HAVE to get married to get alimony, you HAVE to have a child to get child support. Honestly, you're a moron if you can't see this. You're cherry picking.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 02:08 AM
2

It was a biased and misleading stat. You are pointing out the 'vast majority' of women haven't done that, but you're using misleading statistics to try and prove that point. Those don't back up your point at all. It's like me saying, it actually a myth that teenage drivers are worse in the UK, when looking at a pool of 13-19 year olds they actually had the lowest crash rates. This is because 13-16 years old can't actually drive and we're including 17-19 years old who still haven't actually learn…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 08:32 AM
2

But your .4% is wrong. You've taken no. of women receiving alimony/total women which is completely wrong since you can only get alimony if you've actually been married and if you've been divorced. Your 4% is most likely very skewed too, since you're including all the women who haven't actually had children and so would be impossible to receive child support. You can't make a basis of how many would do an act if most of them haven't even had the opportunity to actually do it. Your stats are wrong…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 02:22 AM
-4

That includes all women over 15. Single, married, divorced.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 02:08 AM
1

Why the fuck can't courts use any form of common sense? No one in the world would agree with this.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 01:35 AM
1

Takes into account unreported rapes. We can't dismiss the women rape figures that count them and then include them in male rape figures.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 12:27 AM
5

It's a percentage of the total. So it is not showing what you think. The statistic you're looking for single abusive mothers/total single mothers to compare to single abusive fathers/total single fathers. Currently you're looking at. single abusive mothers/total abusive parents to compare to single abusive fathers/total abusive parents So those percentages won't tell you if a single mother or a single father is more likely to abuse.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 06:28 PM
12

Children have more mothers than fathers due family courts. So it is important to note that this is just showing frequency rather than whether a mother or father is more likely to abuse.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 06:21 PM
7

Respect? Let me quote them for you. "make me view females as even lesser beings." And if you think feminism can make you view a whole gender less, you have some serious problems.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 07:39 PM
7

Just think about what you wrote.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 05:40 PM
1

Just saying, it was a bit pre-emptive.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 12:45 PM
1

An edit after 4 downvotes? You need to chill out. 4 downvotes..
/r/MensRights26/01/14 11:48 AM
3

Men are typically leaders in all walks of life. So you'd be completely fine with typically male being in that definition for leader. Fair enough. If you like to enforce gender stereotypes then I guess that's just you. Perhaps I should add to the US dictionary definition of murder 'typically a black male'. That's cool too yeah? It's not necessarily historical but word's meanings change over time so why should it have to be 'historical'? That's not really relevant to a modern day definition of a w…
/r/MensRights25/01/14 06:38 PM
4

As /u/therapy said; " If you want an example that goes back to the "beginnings of records of society", how about the definition of "leader"? Those have been men in practically all cases in history. However it would be offensive in a modern dictionary to define "leader" as "a person that leads, typically male". " Is that ok?
/r/MensRights25/01/14 05:36 PM
4

I don't think you know what permanent means. You can't change the past but you change your name after being an adult, you can change your address when you're adult, you can change your education when you're an adult you can change your diet when an adult, you can't change being circumcised when you're an adult.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 10:15 PM
6

Naming, Residential area, schooling, diet Not one of those is permanent after reaching adulthood. Thoughts and feelings about tattooing kids?
/r/MensRights24/01/14 07:06 PM
2

Have you not seen how much information they've been gathering?
/r/MensRights23/01/14 06:34 PM
0

The BNP has a decent amount of support too..
/r/MensRights21/01/14 12:38 AM
-1

There not really 'fairly tame'. They're the most extreme right wing party with any decent voting standing except for the BNP.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 12:37 AM
-4

Unfortunately. Nigel Farage is not someone you want supporting this statement.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 12:36 AM
10

/r/PussyPass
/r/MensRights15/01/14 01:16 PM
-2

http://www.reddit.com/r/no_sob_story/comments/1uuiqu/woman_holding_sign/celu8cs "I don't know what 'feminism' means because:"
/r/MensRights10/01/14 06:29 PM
2

The men who have to wait longer to do a shit.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 04:26 PM
6

I'm going to blow all your minds now. A restraunt has two restrooms, a Mens Room and a Womens Room They want to install a changing table They install it in the Women's room NOT TO BE SEXIST because mothers change diapers too. They make the room with the changing table co-ed so fathers can use it too.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 04:26 PM
1

If there were two unisex bathrooms, feminists and women would complain, but the transgendered and men would be fine with it. This one would have no grounds for a lawsuit though.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 04:24 PM
3

Can't we just piss standing up into regular toilets with the door open? Or piss into sinks.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 11:31 PM
13

Your son will never remember the circumcision Is this really relevant?
/r/MensRights06/01/14 04:18 PM
10

That makes it ok?
/r/MensRights06/01/14 04:12 PM
7

The best thing to do is to help your son understand why he shouldn't get his son circumcised when the time comes.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 04:08 PM
3

Still, comparing one man's view (which was spoken, not written down) to "the largest feminist grassroots organisation in the U.S." who has legal advice isn't really the same thing.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 02:18 AM
1

Godwin's law (also known as Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies or Godwin's Law of Nazi Analogies[1][2]) is an assertion made by Mike Godwin in 1990[2] that has become an Internet adage. It states: "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1."[2][3] In other words, Godwin said that, given enough time, in any online discussion—regardless of topic or scope—someone inevitably makes a comparison to Hitler or the Nazis.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 02:13 AM
9

flip the genders. Is it still reasonable? This picture inparticular "After the attack, Mr Aitken required 30 stitches and two hours of surgery. He suffered damage to his nerves and a severed artery" She is a dangerous person and 120 hours unpaid work isn't going to change that.
/r/PussyPass01/01/14 04:28 AM
1

The UK has one of the highest ages of consent in europe. It is predominantly 15 with some places even having as low as 13.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 02:04 PM
1

The problem is, even though it's just awful is that this is one of the most read websites in the world. Number 13 in the UK and It even ranks 102 on Alexa
/r/MensRights31/12/13 02:01 PM
0

i know.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 09:56 PM
-5

2-8% is hardly defined as 'rare'.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 09:30 PM
1

I think you are the one misinterpreting what i'm saying. I'm saying it is preposterous that any disciplinary hearing can even have the audacity to even claim that someone has commited a criminal act when the police can't and punish them in how they feel they should. The university is claiming that someone might have committed rape. I know this is not a criminal trial, I know he won't get an actual criminal sentence. But whatever happens afterwards will be due to their hearing, i.e. banned from u…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 10:12 PM
1

THESE ARE NOT CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS. You cannot be jailed by the county or the state purely because of a disciplinary hearing. Anyone who tells you different is lying. I know that... It's like the John Terry racism thing, FA find him guilty, police say he's not guilty. I just don't get how a company can find you guilty of a crime (which has a life sentence) when the police won't find you guilty or even charge you. If a company finds you guilty of rape (i.e. punishes you for a crime), surely they …
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:35 PM
1

I just meant, sure if you are being accused of a crime, be it in a disciplinary hearing or not, you should be entitled to an attorney. Since the doctor thing was not an actual crime, but really, just poor job performance I can understand why people wouldn't be allowed to bring attorneys into the workplace. If being accused of a crime though, your testimony is future evidence and as such, attorneys should be allowed to be present (imo).
/r/MensRights17/12/13 06:39 PM
-1

Then you sue for lack of evidence i guess?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 06:00 PM
1

Why were you not allowed in though? Also, say this happened to someone, what would happen if they just refused to answer any questions? Also, these doctors aren't actually being accused of a crime though are they? They have negligence insurance incase this happens so the hospital is only accusing them of acting poorly at their job, not an actual criminal offence.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 04:31 PM
1

What happens if you refuse to answer any questions?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 04:21 PM
2

Do you have some examples?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 04:19 PM
22

They aren't getting the money simply because of a vagina. They worked hard for their degrees and their line of work The point of it, is to encourage women to do the postgraduate degree in engineering. Not give them money because they've already done it. And men work hard for their degrees too. Or disabled people? How dare they get special treatment. Because that's the same as giving it to a woman... This sub is about sexual unfairness, not people getting grant money which they deserve because th…
/r/PussyPass12/12/13 02:39 PM
1

caused by other men I don't really get how this is relevant.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 12:59 AM
3

I really wish they hadn't use the word 'fucking'.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 10:08 AM
3

She argued that the figures demonstrate that women’s pay is finally beginning to reflect the higher standards achieved by the fairer sex on leaving school and university. higher standards? fairer sex?
/r/MensRights09/12/13 01:35 PM
4

lt's family said Monday they believe the fatal shooting was an accident and harbor no bad feelings toward Steele. . The four people at the apartment told investigators the same story, police said. Madison Flint, who lives there, invited friends over to hang out. One of them, Joshua Henry, brought a pistol and showed it off to the group, police said. They passed it around and practiced firing it without the bullets inside. Then, Henry reloaded the pistol and set it on the counter, police said. La…
/r/PussyPass09/12/13 01:21 PM
3

The father – who, unlike the child’s mother, cannot claim legal aid Does anyone know why? Is it because he's working, she's not?
/r/MensRights09/12/13 11:14 AM
1

Not your theoretical fantasy. Huh?
/r/MensRights06/12/13 12:52 AM
2

assault?! o.O
/r/MensRights06/12/13 12:38 AM
5

legally.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 12:19 AM
1

I want to get drunk and yell over some loud rap, but possibly hook up with both Group A and B. I don't know though until hours later if the drinking was good enough, how much will you charge me? Also, how many thought police offers do you have on staff?
/r/MensRights06/12/13 12:18 AM
2

That is the nature of what the club is selling. And it is totally legal. Nope. But you're right. If they act illegally and tell lots of lies they can easily get away with it.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 12:12 AM
1

Right ok. I thought it was strange that police would basically 'give up' trying to enforce it.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 09:46 PM
6

Because it is an order of protection and not an injunction for harassment the police are required to attempt to serve it 3 times. I don't understand the 'required to attempt to serve it 3 times'. Could you elaborate on that for me please?
/r/MensRights04/12/13 01:34 PM
16

All the comments were against the article though. Every single one.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 05:33 PM
1

Well, let's investigate his options. He can refuse to pay. Well, in theory she may not be able to afford the abortion. In this case, abortion is no longer her option. She can't have an abortion, so he can't have a financial abortion. Why should one have the option of an abortion if the other doesn't? I don't think convincing a man pay for half the abortion of his baby, to prevent a financial commitment of the next 18 years to be that hard. Either he pays half an abortion, or in theory she may no…
/r/MensRights30/11/13 11:07 AM
2

I am in absolutely no way condoning Lulu.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 12:06 PM
4

I was more thinking of when they get hold of 'nudes', track down the name and facebook and send the images to their friends etc. It's really common, there are threads dedicated to past endeavors.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 11:52 AM
2

The problem is that a) and b) will indistinguishable in the eyes of the law. 4 Scenarios; Both want baby. Fine. The father says he wants to be the father and is liable for half the costs of the entire pregnancy (and childcare on the basis they stay together after the birth.) Neither want baby. Pay half each for abortion. You could debate that it's the woman's issue now since it's only affecting her, but if she couldn't afford it then would it be her fault she had to keep the baby? In this scenar…
/r/MensRights29/11/13 11:45 AM
1

While I agreed with Paul on most of this, and I hate to sound like I'm tone-policing, I must say Paul made a total ass of himself in this. Specifically in the final unstructured portion of the debate. This. When Paul kept shouting over him, and when he started exclaiming 'Oh look, the patriarchy!!!' It made AvfM look like dicks basically. It was so disappointing after, as you said, he was destroying him in the structured part.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 11:04 AM
1

Youtube leave people's deaths on youtube but take this one down?
/r/MensRights29/11/13 10:25 AM
5

That's true and I do suspect this won't be used very often in a large quantity. But if someone has 3 kids, they'd be entitled to 54 weeks unpaid leave (i.e., they can leave whenever they want to!). That threat will always be there even if it isn't taken up most of the time. They wouldn't have written that rule unless they thought some people would use it? I'd hate to have those people employed.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 10:19 AM
1

Read the comments on the article too. No one thought it was sexist.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 10:16 AM
6

Have you ever been on 4chan?
/r/MensRights29/11/13 09:59 AM
3

In addition, all parents of children under 18 will have the right to take up to 18 weeks of unpaid parental leave per parent per child per year. At the moment this right only exists for parents of children under the age of five. Err... that really sucks for employers. Great news on the rights for fathers though. By giving men more rights, even women will benefit because now there will be no reason to employ a man over a woman on the grounds of pregnancy since both can take time off for it. Is th…
/r/MensRights29/11/13 09:07 AM
1

I think we have a serious difference of opinion in when anesthetic is necessary. You seem to think it's only necessary when the patient doesn't actually die. No matter what the pain level, the anesthetic isn't necessary unless they may die. Is local anesthetic ever necessary?
/r/MensRights29/11/13 07:53 AM
1

16 days ago?! I can't remember this convo very well You don't definitely need anesthetic, it's just incredibly painful without it. You also didn't need anesthetic to do leg amputations or remove teeth some time ago.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 12:17 AM
2

Huh? How has WHO turned them down exactly? I'm not sure at what point WHO would ever get involved. Even if they did say something, that still wouldn't influence pharmaceuticals to stop researching it. If money is to be made, they'll make it. It's not the same as amazon at all or the others because WHO doesn't sell medicine. It only buys it in (and as far as i'm aware, they don't buy the pill). So it's not alike at all. WHO saying they don't endorse it is more like a popular reviewer slating some…
/r/MensRights25/11/13 08:05 PM
8

What are you talking about? The WHO is probably the largest supporter of clinical trials in the world. Huh? I was saying, that someone doesn't need WHO's permissions to do research like clinical trials. They're not the ones who give the permission as far as I'm aware. getting the product licensed will be very difficult or impossible. Why would it be difficult or impossible?
/r/MensRights25/11/13 06:09 PM
25

As far as I'm aware, WHO doesn't actually need to support clinical trials into anything? WHO can't stop people doing research can they? I also don't believe it is WHO who licenses products. It will be a countries' own body. Such as the MHRA for the UK.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 05:07 PM
33

no more male contraceptive research would be supported or permitted by them and that all existing programs must stop immediately source?
/r/MensRights25/11/13 04:35 PM
2

Yeah, I think those domestic violent people will take finding out about the check really well. It definitely wouldn't anger them at all.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 04:15 PM
17

Honestly, this looked pretty childish. Not necessarily the message, but the presentation. I didn't like the comics.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 09:56 PM
3

What makes these feminists and not just women?
/r/MensRights22/11/13 01:17 PM
1

What proof does he have? He would require a paternity test which would need the consent of the mother. Or if the child was over 18.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 11:53 AM
5

Agreed, I definitely see it as a joke now. I think if i saw it on facebook myself i'd still take it as a joke. Seeing it on mensrights probably made me instinctively try to see the sexism in it rather than take it at face value as a joke on facebook.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 10:44 PM
24

I was a bit pissed off till I saw these two comments. Thank-you for keeping me grounded.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 10:35 PM
5

Do you have any idea on how the money raised is split?
/r/MensRights14/11/13 04:21 PM
8

derailing Every damn time!
/r/MensRights14/11/13 04:18 PM
6

But they are far more likely to be feminist than the population at large Other than the fact females are more likely to be feminists, I still don't see why HR are more likely to be feminists than other professions. Or perhaps that was your point? But if you say something bad about feminists in the real world, there aren't any white knights or feministas that are going to start screaming their heads off. You'll probably get more than a few 'I agrees', though. I'm still very cautious when i speak …
/r/MensRights13/11/13 08:46 PM
8

Nothing more than casual conversation, I have no reason to believe that feminists flood to HR jobs more than any other job.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 08:42 PM
21

seemed like a pretty baseless assumption
/r/MensRights13/11/13 07:36 PM
18

typically female feminists are they? :/
/r/MensRights13/11/13 06:09 PM
1

Cheers for the life lesson...
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:36 PM
1

Just because everyone wants more money doesn't mean MPs become MPs for the money. Just because they want a pay increase doesn't mean they don't want to help the country still. This would be pretty cool You can't 'factor that in' though since the state isn't paying that plus not all MPs do have second jobs (I do not know how many though). Yes, there are too many MPs who don't give a shit who don't go to the house of commons, try to rob the country with expenses. But they're still in the minority …
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:30 PM
1

The drone believes master's lies. Another attempt to ignore facts without any kind of response. So whos is it? Surely you get to decide, while you're alive, by writing your will. It's sure as hell not the government's. Is what is yours not really yours? Yep, you can, you can give it away, which should be taxed. They all get paid more than £66k, and they all get expenses. Most of them have second homes that are likely (speculation) worth in excess of half a million pounds each. Only as of recentl…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:12 PM
1

That's what they said. For over a hundred quid a month, I'm looking for something more specific, really. I'm sure when you move out of your parents' house you will enjoy the council tax system just as much as I do. Sigh, another attempted attack, I pay my council tax like everyone else, I pay for the potholes to be filled in for when I go to work, I pay like everyone else for the parks to be up kept, I pay like everyone else for refuse to be taken away etc. Stop bitching about it, council tax is…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 10:19 PM
0

Looks like you didn't realise what MPs were paid. I don't think you know the difference between paid, expenses and breaking the law. MPS were paid the 66k salary, expensed travel and stole the second homes from taxpayers money. I expected you to say exactly this. And it is still not relevant. All the time you do this, rebuttal it then! Don't just try and toss something out because you haven't got an answer to it. Oh would you look at that, you imitated me. How very college-age of you. Oh would y…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 09:59 PM
0

It's not anything to do with the point at hand. They can jointly own/rent out/buy the other's share/whatever. It's not important. If they can buy the other's share out then they're not going to lose the home... If they rent out, they've basically lost the home, if they jointly own then you have two families in one house. Of course it is important, if you want to use an anecdote to describe a situation where sentimental value should be valued then taxing the rich then i will use the same too. I c…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 09:04 PM
1

They jointly own the property. It's fairly common and not hugely difficult to understand. Obviously this can happen, but somehow I don't think two families will live under the same roof. I'm telling you that the children earn enough to live but not enough to pay out a large sum. It's fairly straightforward. I guess you could just ignore all the maths I showed you. That's a valid way to defend your point. Well, I don't care if someone's rich. You got jealousy issues? I don't think having a nice h…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 08:22 PM
1

Middle income in this case means they get by comfortably but don't have the cash to pay the tax on the house. It doesn't need to have a specific value. Sigh, so vague. Someone could be property retailer and have 95% of his estate in property. I think anyone in the top 25% has to be classed as a high earner. Anyone less than that can only be taxed up to 14% of their estate. That means, for anyone to lose their family home they'd have to have over 86% of their estate in that single building. Stuff…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 07:41 PM
1

A family home. They've lived there for a few generations. Elderly family member dies. Middle income children can't afford to pay the tax. No more family home. Buying another house isn't the answer to the problem. It's not just bricks and mortar, you know. Or maybe you just see the world ...differently. You didn't define 'middle income', please define what you mean here. Yes I do. Is there any difference between trying to give your child a £1 million home or £1 million cash? Not for tax it should…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 07:31 PM
1

What do you count a mid level? taxing the dead is ludicrous You could argue that once someone dies, no one owns it, which would normally default to the the government/country owning it. Edit: Marriage is another issue, anti-marriage people could say this doesn't matter either. I probably think only stuff earned while married can be passed over tax-free. This means you wouldnt be able to marry into wealth and keep it all. For example, if someone leaves their child a house as inheritance, unless t…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 07:20 PM
1

it affects the low/mid level households far more than the rich ones in real terms. I guess that is you conceding to that point then. Why? Because everything we do is taxed. Why should me giving you money be any different to me paying for a service? Why not just gift each other rather than pay? Either tax everything you do with money, or tax none of it basically except for income. Edit: Do you agree with VAT? After all, it's taxed on the first person's income, then taxed on the second person's in…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 07:04 PM
0

40% had enough to be taxed on. Doesn't mean the amount of tax is that significant to their estate worth. The top 25% has over a £500k estate and so anyone under that threshold (about 15% of people pay less than 14% inheritance tax). And then another 60% of people pay nothing. So only 1/4 will pay more than 15% inheritance tax. So no, inheritance tax does not affect low income families at all (bottom 60%) and middle income earner will pay only upto 14%. Morally? Well I think gifts should be taxed…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 06:58 PM
0

I editted it before I saw your reply. Right about gift tax, wrong about people being affected by it.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 06:46 PM
1

No it doesn't. It stops families that work hard and pay taxes from passing their own legitimately earned wealth on, and it affects the low/mid level households far more than the rich ones in real terms. i said "Inheritance tax stops people becoming wealthy through heritage." Which is precisely what it does. That was such a stupid reply. Affects low level households more? No... Low income households won't have an estate of over 300k. Bit of a non sequitur there Nope. Not true. In the UK it's £325…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 06:29 PM
1

I didn't mean there was a 'gift tax', just that gifts are subject to tax. Inheritance tax is different as it depends on death. It's appalling and morally reprehensible. lol. no. In theory I could just give all my wealth before I die to someone. It doesn't matter when you give it/someone inherits because at the end of the day, you're still giving it someone. Inheritance tax stops people becoming wealthy through heritage. It helps spread the wealth so people don't get rich through lineage. Looks l…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 04:24 PM
0

dense with brain cells.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 01:08 PM
-3

Gifts are subject to tax. So should inheritance. It's like when you get paid and then buy something with it. You get charged income tax as well as VAT. When you inherit something, you are charged income tax and so you are charged inheritance tax because it is basically 'a gift'. If you didnt charge gift tax, then you could just pay all your employees in 'gifts' and they'd never get charged income tax for it.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 06:20 PM
2

Not if the relationship was over. Then he owes her nothing as he is just spending his part of the earning himself. If the relationship is not over, and they are sharing the income between them, then maybe she is indeed entitled to some of it.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 06:18 PM
10

Not quite true. He has a child with her and had a shared income at the time the ticket was bought. "But attorneys for Sanchez say Quezada purchased the ticket based on the couple's shared earnings. Sanchez and Quezada lived together for 10 years, have a child together and shared ownership of a grocery store in Passaic, attorneys say." I have no idea if it's true or not. But don't they announce winners a instantly? So to be an ex-gf they'd have to have split up less than a week after he bought th…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 11:44 AM
1

We should tax all charities the same. We all put into the government pot a a fair rate each. But we let some people decide to not pay the government (to help schools, health etc.) but get to choose to put those taxes into whatever charity they want. Including these I don't see why my taxes go to pay for schools, but someone else's gets to save a certain type of tree or fund some scam artist under the cover as fundraiser (read the #1 on the link, it's shameful).
/r/MensRights10/11/13 11:29 AM
-7

Income is income. If I worked for on minimum wage and finally got a house and the such but someone who worked for millions each yeah but blew it all on whatever. In theory your system would tax me more when I win the lottery because I was wise and saved up my money and got some property. Using the UK tax rate here (i don't know the US) but if I earn less than £40k I get taxed 20% and anything over that I get taxed 40%. So If someone won the lottery who earnt 30k (only paid 20%) and someone won t…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 11:24 AM
1

No, i interpreted it as him saying people dont need to have anaesthetic for a circumcision. It's like me saying I dont need to give you anaesthetic when i take out one of your teeth. I showed him a link of when people don't have anaesthetic to show how bad it is. It was to show the horror when used without (to show that you definitely do need anaesthetic) and then showed him the consequence of it with the deaths due to it, to show how there is no winning with circumcision. I interpreted it as hi…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 11:02 AM
1

In that case, your definition of FGM is extremely rare. When people talk about FGM, they mean female circumcision. All circumcision it mutilation. Cutting off a part of someone's body is mutilating it. Define other things how you want. But saying circumcisions isn't mutilation is wrong. Here [NSFW] is a gallery of circumcision that has meant men are physically unable to have sex or won't due to embarrassment.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 01:06 AM
1

Which one is not mutilation?
/r/MensRights10/11/13 12:51 AM
1

You don't need anaesthetic for circumcision and plenty use anaesthetic for piercing. I am telling what happens not what I think should happen. So how does that detract from anything I've said? Babies are mutilated without anaesthetic, risking infection and death and causing great pain, or babies are mutilated with anaesthetic where many will die from the anaesthetic. I sincerely doubt you'll find anyone here who thinks piercing a baby is ok. And the numbing agent used for piercing is not the sam…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 12:36 AM
0

You don't need anaesthetic for circumcision You sadistic bastard. Seriously, what the hell is wrong with you? Circumcisions deaths, many due to anaesthetic
/r/MensRights10/11/13 12:01 AM
3

You don't need anaesthetic which kills a lot of children to have a piercing.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 10:54 PM
5

You're right, they're definitely not same. After all, one is legal and the other isn't!
/r/MensRights09/11/13 10:51 PM
5

about 100 up, 250 down when i saw it. still a terrible ratio
/r/MensRights08/11/13 06:37 PM
7

"ria48, Sunderland, United Kingdom, 16 hours ago Its so rare for the father to get custody and thank goodness it is. A mother and child have a bond that far exceeds that of the father and it is so important for that bond not to be broken especially in the formative years. Any father who loves his child would know that and want it to."
/r/MensRights08/11/13 01:58 PM
2

Save the link too with the bullet points.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 10:27 AM
2

Actuaries make assumptions based on what they know of your lifestyle, and people like you. Even how you pay your bills, what you do, or what you buy. But it's all on data, it's not about gender at all. Gender is just one category, there are many more relevant categories. Yes... that's my point. They use gender as an aspect of their calculation. Now they are no longer allowed to. Yes but who pays the fines? Premium holders. It's a bit of moot point. If they charge too much then you go to a compet…
/r/MensRights06/11/13 09:50 PM
2

Only insecure people feel condescended on. Maybe you're telling us something about yourself. That was the insulting bit, that's why i 'added' it. Ok so the actuary just uses whether someone goes to Gyn or not. Boom, gender. Yes, because only one gender goes to the gym?! The whole gender thing is irrelevant cause in healthcare it is more likely that they're basing on probability of someone having a particular procedure, and thus implicitly based on gender. Irrelevant? lol, no. If I know your sex …
/r/MensRights06/11/13 08:28 PM
2

Condescending? I'd say pretty direct..Only insecure people feel condescended on. Maybe you're telling us something about yourself. Add insulting. However, the thing is this .. They don't have to ask your gender. They have decades of data they can use to find your gender if they needed to, and in healthcare it's very easy to figure. Ok? They're not allowed to base it on gender though. That's literally all i've stated. They can't ask you that question. My point is that there's no reason to up in a…
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:37 PM
1

I've got no idea, i'm not a big fan.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:33 PM
1

No worries, I get you what you mean. Definitely agreed, it's given women an immense amount of power over their reproductive system, now we really need to give men power of theirs. That's just R&D though, nothing we can do, just gotta wait.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:30 PM
1

majority or the norm Yeah... no one is saying that. That's kinda twisted my words. Condoms are free from the doctor too. no?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:17 PM
1

even more
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:15 PM
2

Doesn't it have to be about a non-male? As in, they conversation topic must be about something other than a man. Voldemort wouldn't count.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:14 PM
1

Some complain that the pill has actually trapped a lot of men into unwanted pregnancies. By faking being on the pill men have been tricked/trapped into a pregnancy. I have no statistic as to how prevalent this is. We do need the male pill though.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:10 PM
2

The actuaries don't only use gender anyway, there are a host of factors that make up a premium. Yeah... obviously. No need to be condescending. I know they have to try and work around it, but legally they can't ask you your sex, or use that information. Doesn't stop them asking loads of other questions that get the same info across. I don't think they're even allowed to ask for a genetic history too even if the client knows it. Are you really bringing up EU in regards to health insurance? ?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:05 PM
-1

I am. Usually females rapists are just ignored, not specified there are none or can't be any. Edit: Nevermind, didn't realise it was a law book.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 06:59 PM
0

This looks oversimplified. We need to know the health risks associated with each one. I don't believe both are used purely for contraceptive. We don't need to be outraged until the science is researched.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 06:52 PM
1

female birth control does help men avoid situations where they are trapped by pregnancy How do you mean?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 06:51 PM
2

I believe the EU recently ruled that car insurance and health(life?) insurance can no longer be based on gender. Quite annoying for actuaries.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 06:49 PM
3

Which do you think there would be more outcry over?
/r/MensRights05/11/13 07:14 PM
1

You're an idiot, you know nothing about foreskin. You don't even know where it goes. You think these people just throw away that foreskin? You truly are ignorant. It goes in Oprah's skin cream of course! Edit: Here's a good website about infant mortality rates due to circumcisions too It's describes some infant deaths and causes on the website too. It truly awful and shocking.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 11:22 PM
1

Oh my god this is horrific. I've never see anything like it.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 11:18 PM
1

"This study finds that approximately 117 neonatal circumcision-related deaths (9.01/100,000) occur annually in the United States, about 1.3% of male neonatal deaths from all causes." Does this change your mind at all? May I also ask, what is your opinion on Jehovah's witness refusing blood transfusions and organ transplants for their children?
/r/MensRights04/11/13 11:16 PM
1

You think there won't be an social stigma to being that guy that organised a sex education class? This should be organised by the school with appropriate funding given to it too.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 11:07 PM
0

They are illegal in the UK i believe, perhaps other places too
/r/MensRights04/11/13 10:48 PM
6

I'm scared to even have a child with a woman.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 10:45 PM
1

When my student council voted in a new law/rule thing, that says we will oppose all sexism. They literally then voted in a policy next that said a minimum of 50% of women will be elected to attend NUS conference (and therefore a maximum of 50% men). This meant women were twice as likely to be elected than a man to the same position if the odds of men and women being elected were equal. i couldn't believe the hypocrisy and why no one thought my point was even valid and everyone (bar a few [3 i th…
/r/MensRights04/11/13 10:09 PM
1

You're raising awareness of the article we've all just read. So you're raising awareness of something we've literally just became aware of by moaning about said article.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 10:00 AM
1

Not when you're moaning to other people moaning about the exact same thing.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 08:51 AM
14

There's a lot of rightfully placed anger here, but what do we want changed because of this article? Whose fault is it that the system is so easy to work in favour of the defendant? How do we get false accusers punished? I like a good moan and groan about current systems, but what is it that is driving these issues forward?
/r/MensRights30/10/13 04:17 PM
-19

Basically this, let's not ostracize those lurkers with broad sweeping generalizations. They have nothing to defend here, as obviously any person reading the article would not be in the woman's favour.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 04:13 PM
2

It's only cruel if the people at the stall treat them differently because they are male.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 04:06 PM
2

Both. It wouldn't work if either one of those criteria weren't met.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 03:22 PM
5

Only give each one of them 75 cents.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 09:04 AM
8

While I agree, one single example almost never proves something.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 09:23 PM
10

Does this not make his point even more valid?
/r/MensRights25/10/13 03:16 PM
2

Every single bit of sexism has two sides, it's obvious because sexism means sexes being treated differently. Father's not getting time with their children after divorces? That's just sexism against women because they've been lumped with more responsibility! Women can't be conscripted? That's the patriarchy telling women what they can and can't do? Women off the titanic first? That's the patriarchy making women endure this treacherous life more. Women socially encouraged to become housewives, tha…
/r/MensRights23/10/13 08:48 AM
2

Yeah exactly. I get saying 'including children' as they are meant to be the innocence. But saying 'including women' just shows how worthless and disposable men are. If this isn't institutionalised sexism then I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 06:31 PM
2

Have you tried typing into google 'including women and children'?
/r/MensRights22/10/13 01:08 PM
5

Am i being daft? That article doesn't mention prison does it? Confirmed for daftness.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 02:41 PM
5

Yeah so? She got a suspended jail sentence. Justice is served! /s
/r/MensRights18/10/13 09:03 AM
2

I'm more interested in her response.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 08:51 AM
1

Yeah, the younger you are the less risk you have of heart disease. Heart disease covers a lot of different heart related issues, it's still a big killer, I was just trying to show that as a #1 killer, it's a slightly skewed statistic.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 09:08 PM
0

Anyone that dies of old age pretty much dies of 'heart disease'.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 12:46 PM
1

Apologies, thought you had more hands on experience. Still, cheers for the info!
/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:38 PM
1

At what point do you have to live in Arizona in order to get their child support laws?
/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:10 PM
2

Child support would still exist without marriage.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:08 PM
0

Every downvote he gets gives me less confidence in this subreddit.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:08 PM
3

The money isn't for the new child. The money is for his own child. He is helping his ex pay for his own child more now though because his ex has less money to spend on that child because the new child is taking up some of their resources. What if the new child was being looked after by the ex because it was a family member's orphan? Is that the ex's fault? Again we see that males are being held responsible for the decisions women make - a decision which has absolutely nothing to do with OP whats…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:05 PM
1

It's 50/50 custody. Which, in my opinion, is the best scenario for a child given the best circumstances. Gaining another child can happen in a few ways. An accident (condoms don't always work), adoption (this would be actively seeking a new child but I believe this wouldn't happen since the adoption agency wouldn't let them without the appropriate support), through death, (i.e. a family member dying and you taking care of their kids), or through marriage (and so the child was already being cared…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:00 PM
1

It does presuppose that there is no other income and that support is equal to the minimum needed. But remember, if the ex had other income (through a father(2) for child(2) for instance) then this would be taken into account of her income and so the father(1) may even have to pay less child support because of the additional income the ex is receiving. I think this is right? /u/Gadflyii ? The minimum needed is a far more difficult issue. It's of course very subjective and I thinking no one really…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:51 PM
0

I can't think of any better method. If you don't up the child(1) support when another child(2) enters the mix then your child(1) won't get what they need when away from you because some of the child(1) support you're giving will have to be spend on child(2) because your ex won't have enough money. Giving more child(1) support is to help your own child(1) while they are away since your ex will be having to split their own money on child(1) and child(2). This is still based on income though so you…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 12:25 PM
2

No idea why you're being downvoted. Ignoring the other problems of giving fathers visitations rights and alimony, this seems like a great way to do child support. This is only Arizona correct? Also, is this done in common practice? Stuff like visitation rights are meant to be unbiased legally but we obviously do see that this isn't carried out. Is child support handled as well in practice as it does on legal paper? You mention 50% as 'standard', in practice it isn't though as it is heavily in th…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 12:08 PM
4

I'd award a Delta if I could. This does seem close to the ideal? I assume if the father was jobless he'd have no support to pay?
/r/MensRights15/10/13 07:50 AM
0

I do agree with your first point. By not having a show there again, it is telling the people in charge that this is not ok. I never said they owe someone. If they would've gone back to that place to perform, but are now not because of that one person, the rest are being punished for that one person's actions. This isn't necessarily 1D's fault of course. If they genuinely feel unsafe, or as you've pointed out, want to send a message to people in charge, then they should. If they don't want to do …
/r/MensRights14/10/13 05:28 PM
2

Harsh to punish everyone for what a single person did.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 03:45 PM
1

I enjoyed this because she says she doesn't really get what feminism is and so she was just speaking from her heart about what she thought was right without any hidden agenda.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 06:08 PM
2

I'm now banned from there. Apparently any opposing opinion is a troll.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 01:27 PM
0

This was someone's comment on the article "This does seem outrageous. But if the man still wants to be involved in the kids lives as a father, he should have to continue playing child support. If he wants to abandon them, then fine, he shouldn't have to pay child support. The person who wronged him wasn't the children, it was his ex-wife and some other man. So I think that the man should have to pay child support as a condition of seeing the kids, but then after the children are grown, he should…
/r/MensRights09/10/13 08:48 AM
1

A bully at work. Is there an HR department? Also, is she being sexist towards you or just against the 'men in her life'? I think this would be important when contacting HR.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 01:50 PM
-2

Then raises the issue that women are more susceptible to peer pressure than men. This appears to be more about the battle of the sexes.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 12:46 AM
-3

But this talks about the negative in women. When we ourselves don't approve of talking about negatives in men.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 11:57 PM
-2

No more informed then the last comment. I still didn't read the article but it's pretty clear what it's about from the title.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 11:55 PM
-5

It's about the lack of men's rights.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 11:53 PM
-5

Hilarious. You're posting an article trying to say that men aren't more corrupt than women and that women are worse than men because they bow down to social pressure. You're trying to counter sexism with sexism. What's the point? It's counter productive. What men's right is the issue here?
/r/MensRights27/09/13 09:15 PM
-10

I didn't read the article, but is this really about men's rights?
/r/MensRights27/09/13 09:05 PM
2

He's only a coward if he wanted to intervene but didn't.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 03:58 PM
1

A dude was slamming his wife's head against the wall. You should've called the police... Any person slamming another person's head into a wall could cause serious brain damage/death.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 03:55 PM
2

Obvious counter argument. Why are women being kept out of these glamorous jobs?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 03:22 PM
0

It's a parody ridiculing the original video. This is not something to be upset about in the slightest. The original video was bad and objectifying for women. (I don't have much problem with the lyrics mind you). They've over done it on the lyrics, but the video, from what i saw, is good satire.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 05:52 PM
1

27 November 2010
/r/MensRights29/08/13 12:55 PM
1

If the child happened to be with the father and the father had a paternity test proving so. Can a man prevent the mother from seeing the child until he sees her visitation rights?
/r/MensRights28/08/13 12:40 PM
1

Wish I hadn't clicked on that at work...
/r/MensRights28/08/13 12:37 PM
1

There were far more than 4/5 http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1kxilo/hi_people_on_this_site_seem_to_talk_about/cbu9hqz This post alone you decided to end the conversation at listed more than that just there. And your addressing was no more than 'blaming on the patriarchy'. I'm just disappointed, I didn't expect much but I did expect more. There is no patriarchy, it doesn't exist. The quicker you can stop blaming men for men and women's problems the quicker we can start addressing issu…
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:49 PM
1

I had to stop watching. That was horrible.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:33 PM
2

I'm so disappointed in you Kate150. Every time you were challenged in this thread with a source or facts you just abandoned that discussion. You obviously haven't researched feminism's effect on men or men's issues. There were countless examples given here and your only responses generally consisted off 'feminism is helping men too' and 'patriarchy'. I don't think you cited a single source in this entire post. And I can't remember any facts or statistics you brought forward.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:28 PM
1

One is socially undignified whereas the other is celebrated. Being a pro sportman is a good thing, being a porn star is a bad thing. This is what society tells us. If being a porn star was celebrated then people wouldnt complain about it, but we see it as undignified. I personally have no problem with people being porn stars and don't see it as exploitation since they dont have to do it. There is a definitely a difference though between being a sportman than a stripper.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:13 PM
1

Paragraphs?
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:06 PM
1

Utterly pointless and basically just showing bitterness. Let's keep posts meaningful and relevant.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 11:40 PM
1

To be fair, there is certainly a double standard here. She is being labelled a slut (though she did do it to two people) while he is praised. Edit: Reading the comments i've learned that she is accusing sexual assault from a completely different guy which we do not have information on. I'm quite firmly on the girl's side here. What she did was shameful and what she gets from online bullying is all down to her. But there is a clear and obvious double standard in that the men are receiving none of…
/r/MensRights24/08/13 11:32 PM
1

When I was at university girls would often come to pee in the men's room because of the shorter lines. There is nothing you can do. Ask them to leave and the girls will laugh at you and tbh, so will the other men. Try report it? Nothing. There was no winning in this situation.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 11:27 PM
2

healthcare should be the same for everyone in my opinion. Would you charge black people more if sickle cell anemia was more common? Should we charge people more who are born with life long diseases? I don't think anyone should ever have to pay more than another person for healthcare. You say men lose out in obamacare. It's just that men and women are going to pay the same, so men are going to pay more for something they use less. But that's just how taxes work, we pay for things we might not nec…
/r/MensRights24/08/13 02:23 PM
2

You're not allowed to discriminate on gender in the UK at least for car insurance.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 12:55 PM
1

in England it is now illegal to discriminate against gender for car insurance. This was a consequence of someone in the EU campaigning for equal heath care insurance which meant all insurance is now gender free.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 12:54 PM
1

Then men should pay more for car insurance.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 11:35 AM
1

Definitely one of his better videos.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:17 PM
1

He's 16, this is sexism he is facing, why should he not have somewhere to talk about things that are affecting him?
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:03 PM
1

Is removing the clitoris not the same principle as removing the foreskin? Both make sex much less enjoyable. Fusing the vagina is horrendous though, I dont think there is a male equivalent to that, short to fusing the end of the penis up.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 04:26 PM
4

Would it be allowed for men to publish their dicks in the university paper? I think not.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 01:49 PM
2

Or she could serve 4 years and then earn and pay the money back after release.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 12:12 PM
7

trope please don't encourage the misuse of that word.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 06:14 PM
2

I used to be a feminist (i.e., pro women's rights, thought women were oppressed, wanted to help out, but never really actively engaged). Then I became a student councillor, where most debates were extremely boring. Then came an event and two new policies which turned my eye. First the event was the woman's councillor deciding she was going to use the women's bus to get home because it was cheap (like 50p/£1), I joked I was going to get it too then. She then proceeded to angrily tell me that I wa…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 05:16 PM
1

I think i read women make up over 80% of total personal expenditure. (Shopping)
/r/MensRights08/08/13 04:23 PM
2

Will children understand the humour?
/r/MensRights08/08/13 04:21 PM
1

I want to follow Goldman round throwing little tiny stones at him, none that can hurt, just really really annoying ones. Whenever he'd tell me to stop, I'd just yell 'you're stupid' and carry on.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 04:20 PM
1

I kinda though the comment (person's comment she read out) was meant to be satirical to point out that only men are picked out on and not black people. When one would be clearly racist, why is the other not immediately sexist?
/r/MensRights06/08/13 03:28 PM
14

Gifted and talented in sport more like.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 03:14 PM
7

Is slapping the right way to go?
/r/MensRights30/07/13 04:09 PM
3

What society are you living in?
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:14 PM
14

Last time I got slapped by a girl (we were both drunk), I slapped her back, just as hard (so not enough to leave a mark). She was obviously totally shocked and started screaming "He hit me, he hit me!" Next think I know two polices officers turn up, the male one talks to her, the female to me, I explain exactly what happened, how I was struck first and how i retaliated with the same force. He then comes over and put me bent over a police car and gets his cuffs out. He tells me he's going to arre…
/r/MensRights21/07/13 09:55 PM
0

Because society has already told us the feminist way is the right way. Thats why I assume most people don't feel the need to join feminist forums. But i think MensRights is bigger because our views are controversial and different from the norm, so we have to seek out somewhere to talk about them.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 10:59 AM
-2

More men feel the need to talk about MRAs, everyone else is already a feminist by default.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 12:39 AM
4

I do subscribe to /r/feminism. It's good to hear opposing ideas rather than just sitting in a circlejerk. The severity of the injuries are listed above, a bite mark, and a bloody nose. If a man had given a woman a bloody nose you can be sure that the police would be holding him in custody. The two main reasons for not pressing charges is fear, or not wanting to on a loved one. You're right she could have been defending herself, in that case he must have been threatening violence against her, in …
/r/MensRights18/07/13 03:07 PM
8

One incidence of domestic violence is one too many. A bloody nose AND a bite mark? That seems like more than 'out of hand' to me.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 02:15 PM
2

What if she refuses to hand it over?
/r/MensRights18/07/13 01:49 PM
2

The problem is, I want to have kids. However, I want to be a single parent. I don't think men have much luck in this scenario?
/r/MensRights18/07/13 01:06 PM
4

I'd rather see my father who paper aborted than who left after I was born. The first screams 'I don't want a child, i'm not ready', the latter says, I don't want this child'.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 12:48 PM
2

Jesus christ...
/r/MensRights17/07/13 08:16 AM
-3

Not if it was picked completely at random.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 03:06 PM
1

The 2 officers talk alone, then come over and cuff me risk me, take my wallet, phone, and keys, then seat me in the back of my car while they check my background and a warren search. Jeez, learn to read.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:40 PM
1

but they DID leave him alone.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 12:07 PM
1

You're missing the point. If they were able to leave him alone and uncuffed to have a little chat, why could they also not do a background check while uncuffed? If he was safe enough to be left alone, at what point did they suddenly consider him a threat to the point of being detained?
/r/MensRights13/07/13 11:34 AM
1

After a few minutes the police show up. Two female police. One goes and talks to the girls, the other talks to me.... The 2 officers talk alone, then come over and cuff me risk me, ... All the while the two sunbathing girls are all giddy about me being in cuffs and taking my pic and text/posting like crazy. So no, they talked to them separately first and then they left him alone, then come back to cuff him.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 11:24 AM
1

Wasn't he detained after the conversation? If it wasn't necessary then, why would it be after? Also, there were two girls, surely those two could overpower the single female officer talking to them?
/r/MensRights13/07/13 10:48 AM
6

A claim is enough to be probably cause? Do people not have rights?
/r/MensRights13/07/13 10:04 AM
1

Why was it necessary for him to be detained after the police had talked to girls and him seperately? After they know the stories, which currently are only stories, how do you decide? Why were cuffs necessary?
/r/MensRights13/07/13 10:02 AM
4

Isn't recording perfectly legal? I mean. he's not going to stand afar and record, he's going to be recording his actions, i.e. walking up to the girls, telling them to leave, and them telling him no.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 09:49 AM
-4

There are many reasons for this to not be here. It has nothing to do with men's rights. It doesn't show evidence that men don't have the same attitude towards women. It's not sourced.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 05:12 PM
1

Giving up a child for adoption is different to abandoning a child.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 04:02 PM
6

I don't know what Lego Discovery actually is, but I definitely don't have a problem with events for children where only adults can attend as guardians. I assume the adults don't really 'attend' but are purely there to make sure their child is ok?
/r/MensRights10/07/13 05:15 PM
12

Fair enough. So there is no issue whatsoever?
/r/MensRights10/07/13 05:03 PM
10

Is this applied to all adults then? Men and women aged 18+?
/r/MensRights10/07/13 04:29 PM
1

It's OK, you just can't think up a very good response.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 04:09 PM
1

best. rebuttal. ever.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 04:06 PM
1

No one gives a shit if you think owning an SUV is immoral. If 50% of the people did, then they could get it banned. Of course morality is subjective. But the majority's morals make up the law. IF the majority of people thought overeating was immoral, then they could campaign for it to become a law and then it would become illegal. If 99% of people think weed is not immoral then eventually it will become legal. And the more polls saying people do indeed think weed is ok, the more likely we keep g…
/r/MensRights10/07/13 03:56 PM
1

You think it's fair to abandon a child? We should be allowed to? You do realise that it is illegal? You are legally not allowed to abandon a child. It is immoral and so it is made illegal. That is why we look down on people for doing it.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 03:13 PM
0

The law is EXACTLY there to enforce morality. It is immoral to kill, so we ban it. It is immoral to steal, so we ban it. It is immoral for companies to monopolize markets as this leads to bad for competitive development and the spread of wealth, so we ban it. Laws are precisely there to enforce human's morals. It was immoral for gay people to marry, now our morals are changing we are allowing it. Just because we got most of our morals from religion doesn't mean we got them all from there.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 03:12 PM
-1

Why would you support a policy if you think it is morally wrong?
/r/MensRights10/07/13 10:20 AM
-1

So you support the policy, but anyone that tries to use it you; criticize and judge for using that exact policy you support. It's like me saying, I support the choice of abortion, but if you ever use it you're a disgusting human being. Because, y'know, we should all be allowed to choose whether to be dickholes or disgusting humans beings.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 07:46 AM
-2

So you think people should be allowed a paper abortion but when this guy basically does that he's a dickhole?
/r/MensRights09/07/13 11:45 PM
1

6 7 8 How do you think male contraceptive pills will effect society? (xpost from Askmen) effect -> affect.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 08:51 AM
0

Men will be much more carefree when it comes to sex. Men will no longer be able to be tricked into becoming a father (though many of the more naive still will). For some reason women see the pill as oppressive by forcing the burden of contraception on them, but if there becomes a male pill I will feel safer, and more in control. In general, births will decline in the western world.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 08:50 AM
3

If it's tongue in cheek/a joke then there is nothing to worry about. Is it ok to make jokes based on gender. As long as you weren't genuinely offended at the time, then it's not something to worry about.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 08:47 AM
3

Gandhi beat his wife.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 08:34 AM
7

Yeah, everyone is always recorded 24/7 at conventions. This incident probably lasted less than 3min before the second employee arrived.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 08:33 AM
9

Still, I don't think that's the issue. He was separating two people after someone had cried for help. If he wasn't aggressive I don't think there is any need for us to criticize the employee here. He separated and then listened to the people's accounts. What more can he do?
/r/MensRights09/07/13 08:30 AM
-1

It is impossible for men to be overpowered by women, duh. This is just a male fantasy and the patriarchy is to blame for this video. It's disgusting to see male producers try to abuse this female artist into being objectified by us by putting her into an impossible situation. God damn patriarchy.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 03:41 PM
5

So what? It only took 5 false rape charges and 77 previous convictions. Those almighty 2 years are definitely justified. I mean c'mon, it's nearly 1/8th of what a rape charge would get! I can sleep so easy tonight thanks to this justice system.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 11:21 PM
2

You can't have a proper discussion without different thoughts.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 11:05 PM
16

That's the point. The fact that there is even a market for this. There is no other use for this other than evil.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 11:04 PM
2

As far as I know you're entitled to regain your court fees if you win the case from the opposition. Which in this case is the ex-wife and the state. The judge has just made a judgement call on who should pay what. What i mean is, is that this doesn't even count as a punishment since this is just what happens in court. I have no idea, there are quite a few crimes here committed by the ex wife and extreme negligence from the police. The guy is suing though. Schehtman has since hired San Francisco …
/r/MensRights06/07/13 12:30 PM
3

The judge’s unusually scathing order sanctions prosecutors and Schehtman’s ex-wife, ordering them to each pay $7,645 in legal fees. Circuit Judge Pedro Echarte, in his Jan. 8 order, called their actions “reprehensible” and “irresponsible.” This isn't even a punishment. You're just paying legal fees because you lost which is a given anyway.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 12:07 PM
2

Not a men's rights issue. It just shows that people will blindly sign something that they think may help them. This could be applied to so many different things. This does not support men's rights or even affect men. Keep this to r/cringe, i don't think it belongs here.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 04:19 PM
-1

It's not a job. It's prize money. People aren't paid to be there, there is no 'job'. You are rewarded for the competition, however men and women are separated due to biological differences.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 03:02 PM
1

I think it was Serena that said she would welcome 5 sets?
/r/MensRights04/07/13 12:30 PM
-2

It doesn't matter if men are better. Women are less able at sports, but why should we give them less money to play sport? It's not their fault they can't compete with men. Both men and women should be able to enjoy sport, and we should reward both for their accomplishments. By taking money away from women's tennis we make it harder for them to take up the sport professionally. It's true men bring more money to sport via sponsorship and the such, and if sport was purely business it would make sen…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 12:30 PM
-1

Yes, women are less tired and enter more tournaments in general (even after Wimbledon their recovery time is shorter) and so get more prize money.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 12:32 PM
8

Make women play 5 sets. Everyone wins.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 12:28 PM
5

Surely it's pay per hour? So long hours doesn't come into it (unless its unpaid overtime). I didn't read it, but if the pay is the same for the jobs, I would definitely pick childcare as my profession. Surely it's supply and demand? People are paid as little as they are allowed to get away with up to the point of minimum wage. People pay enough to get the quality of workers they need. Why are people trying to equate two unequal professions? If there aren't enough child carers, pay them more, if …
/r/MensRights26/06/13 12:58 PM
3

everyday sexism. It's a pretty big thing.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:29 AM
2

Facebook is a public forum and so everyone can see your complaint. Your email is private and so they don't give two hoots. For all we know, the policy was only for mothers and the staff acted accordingly but risking backlash from the facebook complaint they bowed down. Count this as a win.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 09:06 PM
9

I was quite fond of Ted :(.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 05:09 PM
0

Men aren't getting screwed. They are just losing out the most. Men and women will be paying the same costs for the healthcare, basically it is a tax by age. No one in the UK moans about the NHS where women use it more because thats not what a health service is about. As a society we are all able to gain access to the services we need, be it someone who needs to give birth or someone who needs cancer treatment. In an ideal society I would hope that me and my sister would pay the same for healthca…
/r/MensRights26/05/13 10:59 AM
12

and take a picture please.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 04:11 PM
1

Wasn't talking about any link, but yeah. Owell.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:29 PM
1

Why not? She'd already defined as a feminist.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:17 PM
1

I invite you to have a conversation with me about why I believe feminism is hate, and why feminists who actually believe everything that feminism tells them are hateful people for believing it. I thought you were going to discuss feminist views, not 'why you should not associate with the term feminist'. I was just disappointed.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:08 PM
1

I was hoping for such a better conversation than trying to define a feminist or a WRA.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:02 PM
2

At least there is no gender bias in what you say.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:38 PM
1

Either way, I don't agree with them. But you won't find many feminists against abortion.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:30 PM
31

I think "sex is consent to motherhood" therefore illegalise abortion. Is pretty much the only arguement actually needed as to why "sex is consent to fatherhood" is wrong. Women haven't consented to motherhood when they get pregnant, they have a choice for a period afterwards. Much like a man should have. There will be other arguments for and against, but i think there's no real rebuttal to that point.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 02:18 PM
2

Thank god family courts always side with the women.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 12:30 PM
2

Should the victim have their name secret then? If you say they should, I do no respect your opinion. If you think they should not be given the right to anonymity then i'd respect your opinion as at least you'd be treating everyone equally.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 10:57 AM
19

Stop trying to rationalise gender quotas. They are horrendous.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 10:54 AM
5

god fucking damn it.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 06:56 PM
3

She said that men were embracing misogyny, homophobia and violence?! Is she saying that men are becoming more sexist? From her article earlier that is definitely not the message i thought she was going to spread. I shall have go retract my supporting abbott tweet now.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 07:29 PM
3

Could you give me a quick summary of what she's saying on channel 4? The europa league final has got my attention
/r/MensRights15/05/13 07:17 PM
1

The US have only recently started to recognise health inequalities between the rich and poor. Oh Obama <3
/r/MensRights15/05/13 07:15 PM
1

Editted by her? This is the BBC my friend. Articles also often include other people's opinions on a topic. The professor is also meant to be arguing against one of her points. In her article she draws our attention to many men's issues, "During the talk, Ms Abbott will highlight research by the Men's Health Forum, a charity which aims to tackle male health inequalities, which suggests that men are more likely to take their own lives than women, have lower educational attainment at all levels of …
/r/MensRights15/05/13 07:14 PM
3

I'm fairly confident labour have gender quotas
/r/MensRights15/05/13 04:47 PM
3

He says? That last quote was from a male professor not abbot.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 04:45 PM
1

It would be good if the people paying child support could pay for actual things, such as, contributing to an american college fund rather than into the other person's account.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 12:33 PM
2

Only your first point is acceptable. The insult is that being a girl is a bad thing. This is not ok.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 12:29 PM
0

How is this sexism acceptable?
/r/MensRights15/05/13 12:24 PM
14

You cant ask someone on a date? What.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 06:00 PM
7

feminists start as early as 8th grade, so should we. I wish he didn't have to bother with it, and to be honest i hope it doesn't take up his free time since he's still just a kid. But I implore kids today to make use of time in school to develop an understanding and a personal view on issues today.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:49 PM
25

Because she had no respect for what he may or may not have wanted. Am i allowed to go up to random girls, pull down their trousers and start oral sex on them? I promise i'll stop if they say no, but if they just let me, then cool thats cool? Of course not, the crime was committed as soon as she pulled down his trousers, a second crime started when she started oral sex with out permission. Now, just because he decided that he did want it (after it had started) doesn't mean a crime wasn't committe…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 05:31 PM
4

No, it's not about being sexualised. Do you let your mum see you naked? I don't, it would be embarrassing that's not be fearing my mum will sexualise my fit body but to me it's a private matter. I shut my door when I change, Do you? It's the organ I use with my partners, it is when I am at my most intimate and it's private. Heck, when it's summer do you just walk around naked? I assume you don't give a shit who sees you naked. Maybe I should stick to stalls, as I certainly want privacy when I go…
/r/MensRights03/05/13 06:09 PM
1

But she wouldn't make up the lie in the first place if she could go to prison for it. (theoretically)
/r/MensRights03/05/13 01:00 PM
2

I don't think the false accusers can be held responsible if it makes the news (unless purposely leaked) but, if it makes the news, all papers and media should have to report the false accusers name with the same amount of time/page coverage to them being a false accuser, with a personal apology from the person. They should also have to allocate the same time/page coverage of a personal apology from the paper/media apologising for their mistake to the actual victim with the victim's discretion wh…
/r/MensRights03/05/13 12:59 PM
3

I kinda wanna see the evidence.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 12:38 PM
151

Definitely bring it up, this is sexism. Why on earth are the females allowed to into the males?! Men's privacy is actually more likely to be violated since men use urinals. Even so, both should stick to their own gender's toilets.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 12:35 PM
0

thanks again
/r/MensRights02/05/13 05:12 PM
1

will do. Cheers
/r/MensRights02/05/13 04:25 PM
1

Sooo, tonight or last night?
/r/MensRights02/05/13 04:13 PM
4

Great article, thanks for sharing.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 11:40 PM
11

Did you watch the video? Another woman did this in 1993 and GOT OFF by claiming insanity.... What the fuck.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 05:29 PM
1

I've watched them all now (except the first one), thank-you for sharing them.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 12:36 PM
1

Number [25], I have no words, no words at all. They were 8th graders, 14? And no punishment?!! Why were they not expelled? If the roles were reversed....
/r/MensRights29/04/13 09:02 AM
6

For me it is freedom of speech. It may sound silly and nonsense but as a whilte male I am allowed little say on gender or race issues. If i see discrimination against a man, I can not speak up in fear of being labelled a sexist and have my opinion ignored because as a white man i do not know what it is like to ever have it worse than others. In the world it is a noble cause to stand up for women's issues and it is blasphemy to stand up for men's. Now, feminists will argue that men have all the s…
/r/MensRights29/04/13 08:45 AM
1

The adults have still been discriminated on. They have been ignored in favour of the children. They have been treated negatively based on their age. Children may need more help but it is still discrimination nonetheless. One is treated positively and one is treated negatively based on a preconception of whom you want to help. Ignoring someone is still discrimination if you don't ignore someone else based on some specific criteria. If i decided give everyone a tenner based on their ownership of a…
/r/MensRights29/04/13 08:29 AM
0

Surely that is just violence?
/r/MensRights26/04/13 10:48 PM
3

If his ninja skills were indeed mastery beyond legends could exagerate, then she hadn't made an attack? Now, if she had moved even an inch towards him with a weapon, motioning an attack, then throw the book at her. I'm only pitching my fork as soon as the monster takes a swipe at me.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 08:32 PM
5

If that's the law's words then i stand corrected. I thought domestic violence would require a scenario where law/living arrangements tied you together. Basically, if you lived with the person, or were married/parents or were being financially supported by the person.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 04:21 PM
1

1) while this will help, is 3 months still enough? If i attack you with a cleaver i feel as though there are very few to no scenarios where that sentence is enough even if i had just swung and missed. 2) Induce it? It was pre-meditated. There is no defence for crime of passion here. Even if there wasn't torture could 3 months be enough to justify and attack with 3 different weapons? 3) Why indeed when I can see no scenario where an attack with a deadly weapon could be worth only 3 months. I thin…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:42 PM
3

Isn't domestic kinda synonymous with household/family? The ex filled neither of these criteria. I don't think this is domestic violence. But let's definitely focus on the jail time!
/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:31 PM
14

3 months... 3 months?! How the hell did she only get 3 months?
/r/MensRights26/04/13 12:48 PM
1

but you're saying choosing women over men is 'positive' discrimination?! men being neglected for women, is 'positive'? Really? In your scenario, women have been treated differently to men, they have been treating positively and men have been treating negatively. It's purely discrimination which is a negative thing to do. edit: punctuation.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 07:59 AM
2

Who cares whose fault it is?! I don't blame the germans for Hitler anymore. I don't have abnormal fear of my queen because the monarchy has mass murdered before. The problem is that the issue is NOW, and we need to fix everyone's issues NOW! As a man, none of this is my fault!! I have very little influence and power and i'm suffering. Just because it was a "patriarchy" in the past, don't blame me! I'll help your issues, if you help mine too.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 07:15 AM
2

Couldn't you argue "giving food to homeless women" is not positive discrimination because you've given food to women and not men? Aka, negative discrimination. "Giving food to homeless people" has no discrimination, (unless you say rich people should get it too) but thats more an argument for socialism.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 07:05 AM
2

8 people get voted in. A minimum of 50% women get elected. So, this is the same as, taking the top 8 women voted (the max that can get voted in), and the top 4 men (the max that can get voted in) from all the possible candidates. So you now have 12 people. You now just take the top 8 voted candidates from that. Which could be 4/4 or 8/0. There are twice as many women in that pool, so twice as likely to win. I could probably do a few calculations with the binomial distribution if you were interes…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 06:40 AM
5

My student union voted to have a minimum of 50% women get elected the annual NUS event. 8 people get voted in. Mathematically this means the probability of a woman being elected is 2/3, a man is 1/3. By having the word 'minimum' it now means women are twice as likely to get voted in as men. I told people how this was unfair in council, i argued that the officer had shown no evidence of gender voting bias. All she had was 'winning candidates'. No info on voting skewness, no info on how many of ea…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 09:46 PM
5

What would happen if you stopped making payments until you were allowed visitation rights? Would the judge just immediately rule against you?
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:30 PM
1

What if a woman lied about birth control? Then surely that must be rape.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:18 PM
15

I'm from the UK so don't know american custody/alimony laws. But i find the whole statement 'anti-women' totally unjustified? The new legislation never mentions men or women once. It says that they should get equal custody (no sexism here), and purely limits alimony payments regardless of which gender is paying which. Just because it may effect women more, since they choose to stay at home while the man works doesn't make it anti women? It just means they will primarily lose out. It's like sayin…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 09:13 PM
1

Also, there are more nerve endings in the foreskins. Cutting it off basically means he will get less pleasure from sex for the rest of his life.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 08:54 PM
3

This has made my day.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 10:24 AM
1

It says it was banned anyway? So, not really much to say on this.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 10:07 AM
2

10 years in prison.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 09:57 AM
2

I've heard this response way too many times. It gives me so little hope for change. Obviously you're being ironic, but so many people will believe it to be true.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 09:57 AM
1

pretty much this. It's just double standards being brought into attention in a light way.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 11:40 AM
1

What were the repealed sections 10-15?
/r/MensRights13/04/13 11:07 AM
1

Apologies, 24 weeks. http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Abortion/Pages/Introduction.aspx
/r/MensRights12/04/13 10:17 PM
1

That subreddit exists?!!?!
/r/MensRights12/04/13 07:44 PM
1

The sexism started when the boys and girls were separated to take part in different activities.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 07:22 PM
1

I've had the same issue, standing up for myself about issues that affect me as a man, making me a sexist. I used to be scared to post things on twitter about cases and issues. To be honest, i still am. I now make my profile private and post (still with great care) to my known followers. Many will still say things, but at least i know it's unlikely to escalate. I'm gradually being able to post more and more as I begin to accept the title that many of them will give me as the sexist pig.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 07:16 PM
1

I believe that when a future mum and dad find out they are indeed soon to be. They each have their own individual rights. The woman should have the right to; An abortion Medicalcare support and care during pregnancy The man should have the right to; Opting out of becoming the father of the child. This means he will have no right to see the child once born if he opts out. He also has no legal binding to support the child once born financially. I think the man should have the right, up to the poin…
/r/MensRights12/04/13 07:08 PM
8

There is something wrong with this. It focuses attention on women and renders men's needs secondary. The line 'This Act shall promote gender equality' is enough and let's us help everyone that needs it. edit: grammar
/r/MensRights12/04/13 06:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter