TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kyrie-eleison Archive

View 0 posts and 20 comments by kyrie-eleison on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
97

If women express their sexuality, they're "liberated" and "fighting the patriarchy." If a man does the same, he's "invoking privilege," "objectifying women" or "being oppressive."
/r/MensRights23/09/12 10:58 PM
4

Aside from coincidentally preferring a double-edged razor, none of these would "make me feel like a man." I don't feel the need to conform to traditional gender stereotypes.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 11:28 PM
2

I don't, no. Just like Feminism, the men's rights movement has its share of crazies.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 06:06 AM
1

I didn't realize anyone would need one.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 04:58 AM
25

A philosophy professor of mine actually wrote a short article arguing that if a woman has the right to an abortion, the father should have the right to abdicate all responsibility to the child. EDIT [warning: pdf]: Found it.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 06:32 PM
4

It's always at the bottom for me. Doesn't really get in the way.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 05:17 PM
7

It only references "scumbag husbands." There's no reason it couldn't have shown an androgynous hand and read "spouse," not that the product should exist at all, of course.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 12:28 PM
7

I wish this had been taught in high school, though I wish my school had sex ed to begin with.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 10:13 PM
1

That's very true. My background is mostly literary theory / continental philosophy, so I tend to lean toward the abstract / hypothetical / structural. I wish there were an easy way to mark the distinction in speech and writing.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 01:30 AM
0

But therein lies the problem. Feminism is supposed to be about gender equality, with the general tactic of maintaining and expanding women's rights, which, at the time of its inception, was the most sensible approach. Today, though, Feminism's supposed to have evolved into equality for both genders. So, a woman telling a man to "man up" expressly violates contemporary Feminism.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 05:00 PM
5

I don't think so. It smells like one because we're dealing with the definition of a classification, but I think "man up" does violate the fundamental principles of Feminism, unless someone would define it as something other than a movement in favor of gender equality.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 03:04 PM
0

And that would be a sexist, perverted view of men's rights.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 12:20 AM
1

I think it's more romantic when the man spoils the woman. I think it's more romantic when men and women treat each other equally. Well maybe they should wear suits more often than they do. It's just clothing. The car in itself doesn't matter. It's just one more way in which modern men fall short. Fall short of what? Your arbitrary definition of a "real man"?
/r/MensRights07/05/12 12:18 AM
3

I'm inclined to believe you're a troll, but regardless... Chivalry died when women (rightfully) demanded equality. If the genders are equal, then there's no reason the onus should lie solely on the man. Why shouldn't the woman pay her share? Why should the man have to "dazzle her all evening"? The women I date are entirely capable of opening doors for themselves. Dating shouldn't be about the man impressing the woman to prove he's worthy. These days, jeans and a shirt are acceptable "date" attir…
/r/MensRights06/05/12 11:41 PM
3

I'd consider myself a gender egalitarian. Using words like MRA and feminist perpetuate the gender binary. The problem for a lot of the men here is that "feminism" has, partially, turned into, at best, a disregard for the possibility that there may be negatives to being male, and, at worst, blatant misandry. So, the definition of "feminism" can lead to confusion. (Equal rights for women vs. women are better vs. men are evil vs. first wave feminism, second wave, etc. etc.) Regardless, I highly rec…
/r/MensRights03/05/12 12:30 AM
1

I would define intelligence differently, but, working from your own, I suppose the loss of "whom" as datum would be a net loss of intelligence. However, as a student of linguistics, I cannot stress enough that language change is nothing negative. Why preserve "whom" if the majority of speakers don't care to keep it? We have "who" filling the same role, just as effectively. There's no loss of meaning, there's no confusion, whatever prejudiced value-judgments you're placing on the objective "who."…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 11:52 PM
2

Are you really equating intelligence to an outdated pronoun?
/r/MensRights23/04/12 09:17 PM
0

Oh, please. "Whom" is dying, if not dead.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 08:23 PM
0

When people speak in their native dialect, it's often easy to identify them by it.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 03:42 AM
2

I dislike feminism because addressing the problems of a single gender will not bring equality.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter