kyzfrintin Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-4	The term “mansplain” isn’t just sexist hate speech, it is often also a narcissistic deflection people resort to when they feel intellectually inadequate. 100% of nagging accusations against women are just men feeling called out and unable to admit it, so resorting to insults	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/05/25 10:37 AM
-4	The term “mansplain” isn’t just sexist hate speech, it is often also a narcissistic deflection people resort to when they feel intellectually inadequate. Jesus christ you guys are so deliberately oblivious and miserable	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/05/25 10:36 AM
1	Invalidating men’s issues is counterproductive to feminism. Because that seems to be the way most feminists operate Really?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/05/25 10:00 AM
1	Invalidating men’s issues is counterproductive to feminism. They are sincere. I also never said this was limited to twitter, or said anything about tweets before you did. The statement "anyone with more than 3 twitter followers" just means "anyone with an actual following". The fact that you'll only accept tweets is a you problem. Lastly, i just don't care any more. I've come to realise, after reading a few more threads, that this sub reddit is "left wing" in name only. You're all a bunch of liberals at best, and have the exact same implicit beliefs as a…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/05/25 09:59 AM
1	Invalidating men’s issues is counterproductive to feminism. If we define "benefiting from and upholding a system where men benefit more from patriarchy than women" as "oppression" then no there is no difference between thinking all men are oppressors and thinking men benefit more from the patriarchy. Why would we define it that way? "If we define this in a way tailored to make my claim correct, then I'm correct".	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/05/25 02:47 AM
1	Invalidating men’s issues is counterproductive to feminism. More distinction without a difference. How is that, exactly? I'm actually asking - are you saying there is difference between someone who oppresses and someone who doesn't? Or is this you yet again repeating that there is no difference between believing all men are oppressors, and believing that men belong to a gender that benefits more from patriarchy than women do? How do we define whether or not a man is oppressing women? I'm not sure I believe this is a sincere question. What about abuse? Ha…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/05/25 12:27 AM
1	Invalidating men’s issues is counterproductive to feminism. by which standard do they tell apart the men who are oppressors from the ones which are not? Oppression	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/05/25 10:38 PM
1	Invalidating men’s issues is counterproductive to feminism. Saying i didn't explain is just a bare faced lie. My explanation was the very first thing I said to you.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/05/25 08:50 PM
1	Invalidating men’s issues is counterproductive to feminism. You asked for proof that any feminists whatsoever talk about men's issues ever, even a little bit. Don't move the goalposts.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/05/25 07:11 PM
1	Invalidating men’s issues is counterproductive to feminism. Its only the "fallacy fallacy" when it stands alone, with no justification, as if the name of the fallacy were a magic spell. I didn't do that, though: I explained my point. I'll read further when you demonstrate any ability to keep up.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/05/25 07:08 PM
0	Invalidating men’s issues is counterproductive to feminism. I'm not talking elaborately or metaphorically. This really isn't anywhere near the level of abstraction deserving of "in English please". If you've never heard of the motte and bailey fallacy, it's quite simply just a rhetorical bait and switch. State any absurd belief, then, when questioned, retreat to something else more sensible. Such as, "feminists claim all men are oppressors", then "feminists claim society is patriarchal". I won't bother to explain the very simple idea of tying yourself in…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/05/25 01:31 PM
0	Invalidating men’s issues is counterproductive to feminism. You're trying desperately to fit your motte into your bailey, but it is physically impossible and so you have tied yourself in an endless, infinite knot. It's quite a sight.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/05/25 09:49 AM
1	Invalidating men’s issues is counterproductive to feminism. One of the most prominent leftists/females on social media directly addressing men's issues in a nuanced way: https://youtu.be/S1xxcKCGljY?si=z2qtg2SqZk_qriaW And another: https://youtu.be/AeGEv0YVLtw?si=b2PRcpegLxbfxXGI Here's one i saw just yesterday: https://youtu.be/SbdymMmnspQ?si=LtC40p6qmRrNTnek Feminists have always recognised that men struggle in their own way, and face their own challenges.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/05/25 09:47 AM
1	Invalidating men’s issues is counterproductive to feminism. When was the last time you heard them talk about teaching w0men to not rape men? Protesting against biased family court or for equal jail sentences for men and w0men? Every single time a feminist with more than 3 Twitter followers speaks about men Btw, not every claim of "they don't fit the definition of the word you're using" is a no true Scotsman fallacy. Is a three-wheeled cycling implement a true bicycle? Is it a no true Scotsmen if I point out bicycles have two wheels? Of course not, and it…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	20/05/25 02:47 PM
1	Invalidating men’s issues is counterproductive to feminism. the feminist view of society being organized as a patriarchy set up for the benefit of men at the expense of women is not mainstream feminism? Nice Bailey, but i was talking about your motte: the claim that all men are oppressors. Yes, the claim that all men are oppressors and all women victims is an extremist, fringe view. Believing that society is patriarchy is not the same as believing all men are oppressors, any more than saying Nazis are fascists is calling all Germans fascists.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	20/05/25 02:46 PM
1	Invalidating men’s issues is counterproductive to feminism. Now admit you're either lying, being lazy, or simply don't know what you're talking about. It is BEYOND ABSURD to say the entire movement is completely divorced from its theory. You might as well say socialists as a whole view worker ownership as untenable, or that capitalists hate owning things.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	20/05/25 11:53 AM
2	Invalidating men’s issues is counterproductive to feminism. This "male oppressor/female victim dynamic" is not a set in stone rule of feminism. It is a fringe, extremist view that should not be taken seriously as representative of feminism.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	20/05/25 11:52 AM
1	Boys aren't going to the manosphere or red pill content because they necessarily like what's being said. They feel it's the only place they are authorized to be. And current feminist discourse isn't helping. While I agree in general that the left is lacking when it comes to appealing to men specifically in regards to positive masculinity, I don't accept the idea that feminism is in any large way man hating, or that masculinity is itself seen as a negative thing. In fact, I see many feminists talking quite freely about the struggles men face, and putting forward positive visions of masculinity: honesty, empathy, strength of character and protecting those you love. And this isn't new - feminists have …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	20/05/25 11:49 AM
6	Kesha gets denied a hug from Jerry Seinfeld "I might be wrong, but I'm still right."	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/11/19 08:52 PM
7	Open Cuckoldry So... It's a joke. Because it still is a joke.	/r/MGTOW	26/04/16 11:25 PM