TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

l2ka Archive

View 13 posts and 98 comments by l2ka on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
345

l2ka/r/PussyPass30/08/14 07:37 PM
203

l2ka/r/PussyPass18/08/14 02:36 AM
188

Edu./Occu.l2ka/r/MensRights12/10/15 02:58 PM
123

Anti-MRMl2ka/r/MensRights03/08/15 02:18 PM
112

l2ka/r/PussyPass14/04/15 02:23 PM
110

l2ka/r/PussyPass26/01/15 12:56 AM
86

l2ka/r/PussyPass07/05/15 03:03 PM
68

l2ka/r/MensRights01/08/16 04:18 PM
55

Marriage/Divorcel2ka/r/MensRights26/07/15 04:31 PM
53

Discriminationl2ka/r/MensRights19/10/15 04:06 AM
53

l2ka/r/MensRights04/08/16 05:08 AM
29

Generall2ka/r/MensRights30/10/15 11:54 PM
6

Discriminationl2ka/r/MensRights09/03/19 05:16 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

a couple thousand You sure about that percentage bud?
/r/PussyPass06/03/20 11:14 PM
1

I do believe this is just another, all be it more specific term for the Horseshoe Theory. A dual sided system that runs on the same principles no matter which end you choose.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 10:34 AM
60

Daddy Kart™
/r/MensRights14/04/19 03:18 AM
17

In all my years on this subreddit, I think this is the most grievous PP I've ever seen. The difference in what would happen to a man in this case is so obvious I can't even put into words.
/r/PussyPass04/04/19 10:46 AM
1

What the fuck did I just watch? The hypocrisy there was far beyond fathomable.
/r/PussyPass12/03/19 06:05 PM
14

Lincoln.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 09:20 AM
1

Is that all?
/r/MensRights08/03/19 08:14 PM
1

Ok, I'm bored, let's do this. Rape is a 1 time violation that might or might not scar you. Mind-control affects you in ways you won't understand for years, if you are lucky. Would you say it was better if he said emphatically "no" but got fucked anyhow? Nah, he just took the easy route. Not as bad in the immediate (you are correct!), but he's so fucked in the head, he can't even interpret his own emotions until later. He has no recourse, he is a man. [Topic related] That is the issue to a large …
/r/MensRights28/02/19 02:10 PM
1

I won't feel sorry for him for falling for it But that IS your duty sir. He is a victim of worse than rape.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 12:07 PM
19

But it worked so well with Ghostbusters (2016), didn't it?
/r/MensRights26/02/19 07:57 AM
4

Be there for your friends. In Spades. Please.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 12:56 AM
4

If she doesn't know, we can't tell her.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 06:27 AM
1

no amateurs at psychological games I'm very glad you understand this. Too many here think it's a simple matter to just RedPill their way through tough times. The reality is, if you open your heart to someone, you make yourself vulnerable to these things. Sure, one could plow through life and never do that, but there is no sure fire way to give love and not take a chance of falling prey to one of these people. Male or female. It really is a skill, just like socialization. Some who are adept at it…
/r/MensRights06/08/16 02:23 AM
3

People like this will never engage in logical debate. Whenever someone's argument is nothign more than "nanny-nanny-boo-boo", you're just wasting your time. I am glad, however, you posted this for others to see and think about.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 11:55 PM
1

I think you are spot on about everything. Any peaceful resolution relies mainly on her. Also, as you pointed out, any little error OP makes will hurt him, while she can carry on in her manner undisturbed indefinitely. While changing his attitude could help if done carefully and properly, you have hit on something that many people on the outside fail to understand. And this is also why this is a men's issue. Essentially that leaving a person like this is a cost/benefit analysis. A man does not al…
/r/MensRights05/08/16 03:20 PM
11

No problem. You are already aware of gaslighting as a tactic, which is good. But that doesn't stop it from being effective, hence your confusion. If you reviewed the abuse checklist I linked before, you've probably noticed that you meet nearly (if not all) of the non-violent signs of being abused. Violence may come later of course, either directly or via proxy. But guilt trips and emotional control seem to be her main methods for now and if I had to guess, she sounds like a proxy abuser if it ev…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 08:22 PM
24

Note to other readers: I am normally suspicious of throwaways, but in this case I believe this is credible for 2 main reasons. First off, this isn't exactly the kind of thing someone might feel comfortable (or safe) posting on a well used account. Secondly, the specifics of this are just too spot on. It's the small things like saying she claims the plastic bin belongs to her. It sounds small and trivial and ridiculous. That's why it gives a sense of reality to all this. So unless this is a cut/p…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 05:54 PM
11

Not only did the old "heroic single moms" trope get mentioned (do unheroic ones even exist anymore?), but they were STILL outraged that the specific word "girl" wasn't used. Constantly moving those goalposts so often it's on wheels.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 05:26 AM
12

How one company benefits from this.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 05:12 AM
25

a public oath to the girls This is so stupid, it's funny. Then I remember people take this sort of thing seriously and lose the smile. What possible more could they want from the boys? An oath to what, bow in their presence like some sort of royalty? Like you said, if both genders did it, it might make for a respectable notion, but just the boys is ludicrous. Bravo for teaching your son not to be a doormat.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 02:44 AM
60

Report: Stating Current Year Still Leading Argument For Social Reform
/r/MensRights30/07/16 03:03 PM
20

Well sure, it's all part of the 3 part series to domination via perpetual victimhood: The first is burying your head in the sand - "Even in the face of outstanding evidence to the contrary, it's true!" The second is moving the goalposts to still accommodate the premise - "Well, there is still enough validity to some of the other details to qualify, so it's basically true!" The third and final is just plain misplaced punitive comeuppance - "Welllll, those men have had this coming for a long time …
/r/MensRights29/07/16 02:25 PM
16

chose That's the hard part, it's a conscious effort. Too many people just stumble through life and never think about, let alone choose to be different unless it's immediately beneficial. After all, why would they? If things seem fine moment to moment, their emotions just run rampant and they don't logically consider squat.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 01:31 AM
16

Just a suggestion, but how about a less clickbaity title next time?
/r/MensRights28/07/16 01:33 PM
42

The fact that these were small children makes this exponentially worse. What possible gain is there?
/r/MensRights24/07/16 04:53 PM
30

Gaby Dunn complaining about men saying hi to her. THIS is the type of person who is being catered to here.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 08:46 PM
19

If this mentality is followed through to conclusion, you can expect these "field trips" to be ever more specific. Why not have the boys take a "gender equality" class while waiting? Why not make passing it mandatory for graduation? Why not use this as an opportunity to teach boys not to objectify women? Why not make the boys dress formal that day to make it respectable? Why not allow the girls to dress as they please that day to encourage self expression? Why not award all the girls a special ce…
/r/MensRights28/06/16 06:01 PM
23

Male version: "What is 72/9?" (multiple choice, one correct answer) Female version: "How does 72/9 make you feel?" (fill in the blank, all answers correct) Resulting headline: "See! Women really are better at math!"
/r/MensRights28/06/16 05:23 PM
16

the stronger party The real kicker about this is that it's a false cause. The reality is that we hear all the time how women are "just as capable" at anything and everything and therefore deserve to have a foot in every door, at or exceeding 50% (but only when it's a good thing). A 95 lb. man would be arrested vs. a 250 lb. woman any day so that's not even correct. It's all just subterfuge and doublespeak for something else. Many people have been gaslighted into believing this nonsense and don't…
/r/MensRights19/06/16 02:10 AM
21

The biggest problem with that is no has ANY IDEA what OPs profile looked like. I guess if it had nothing but bikini shots at the Tiki Bar and said "Bring it on boys ;-)" it might attract the wrong people. She could be making the whole thing up, who knows. That aside, no one even bothers to consider what type of men (not age or job type, but MINDSET) are using the site(s) she used. No one bothers to consider what works with the women on those site(s). If it's a hookup site, guess what? If it's a …
/r/MensRights11/06/16 09:52 PM
16

...worried about the effect such machines might have on people’s ability to form human relationships. They are basically saying exactly what you said from the diamond dealer's perspective. I don’t think they’re being aimed at the lesbian market quite yet. WTF does this even mean? The problem is not that sex robots are available: it’s that they are wanted. You can say that again Missy. There is nothing less erotic than someone believing or insisting that whatever else might be going on... ...they…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 09:49 PM
37

This^ is just the evolution of this
/r/MensRights10/06/16 06:06 PM
11

Phase II: Get people to care and take this seriously.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 11:39 PM
12

You are very close. While her insecurity, control tactics, and digging for emotional ammunition to use against him are paramount here, there is the "small" issue of the sisterhood mentality. Because even if he didn't do anything wrong, he still did. I'd like to introduce to you the concept for when all else fails: Micro-Cheating
/r/MensRights29/05/16 08:03 PM
10

That was hilarious to read. Here's a few highlights... So much for chivalry. I find it amazing that these "modern women" who shudder at traditional roles suddenly refer to this term that is over 800 years old as if it is owed to them. “I cut him off so quickly and stopped texting him back,” Bailey told The Post. “I do not have time for scrubs.” He could be good looking, intelligent, confident, and the sweetest guy you ever met. But if he doesn't throw cash at you like you are swirling around a p…
/r/MensRights27/05/16 10:46 PM
8

I saw almost exactly the same thing. One logical fallacy after another. No substance, just one tactic after another trying to make their view sound correct. I can tolerate conflicting points of view or honesty about intent for an opposing side, but this type of thing in this quantity, is the lowest form of human communication. In this case, it is extra aggravating to even read for a few key reasons... This person is not a troll and actually believes these arguments are sound. Said person is a fu…
/r/MensRights18/05/16 08:06 PM
83

I noticed a particularly aggravating discussion in the Facebook comments section. I was nearly convinced the "woman" defending "feminism" was troll due to the repetitive and outlandish nature of her comments. Turns out, after a simple search, she is real & actually a college professor. Anyhow, here it is... She and Tocqueville obviously does/did not not understand what feminism is or what feminists have fought (for and against) for so long. It's not about erasing anything, it's simply about equa…
/r/MensRights18/05/16 02:17 PM
13

Here's what I see. "Permission" is a red herring. This is about choice, not permission. No one bothers to ask whether he wants his own child!? Ridiculous. The whole part about how it's really his fault because he didn't do a Google search on how to beg for permission and prove his worthiness to be what he already is, the father and in this case the secondary default custodian, and "That's just the way it is.", is beyond offensive to basic humanity. As Douglas Adams displayed in the flippant natu…
/r/MensRights17/05/16 04:49 PM
15

In other news: Local repeat car thief want to know why he's being targeted by authorities. Says he's "Just trying to help the automotive industry."
/r/MensRights17/05/16 04:20 PM
16

The problem is defining "respect." What you consider respect is deluded to include things like the accommodation of trivial matters of the heart to others. Self centered people don't seem to get that things like not bumping into them or letting them speak their mind does not equate to agreeing with everything they feel and constantly giving them what they want.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 06:24 PM
8

That is a very tough question to answer accurately for a few reasons. In part because saying you agree with something doesn't mean you agree it's actually a problem (i.e. Society DOES pressure women to "look good"). Secondly, because a lot of what they say is not really what they mean, so can agree with the statement, but not the implication (i.e. We want equality! But we only want men to be drafted). And finally, because since the presumed reason for a problem is not always accurate, therefore …
/r/MensRights05/05/16 11:41 PM
18

How I pictured those other posters
/r/MensRights05/05/16 11:19 PM
9

None of this really changes anything. A certain portion of women feel oppressed, and that's all that matters, is the proof, and no amount of facts will change their mind. This might be the only thing both sides completely agree on. One example of why this is the simple matter that men are, all in all, born physically stronger than women. This can never be fixed, therefore true absolute "equality" can never be achieved. Women will always be overall physically weaker, which when you throw out logi…
/r/MensRights03/05/16 02:21 PM
19

Some jurors view that more as a right of passage into manhood than a criminal act. Source of problem detected.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 01:34 PM
5

Not to mention outsourcing employees.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 04:47 AM
15

Well it all falls back to the common notion that anything that happens to women is exponentially worse, even if it so occurs that men experience the same thing worse or more often. "Today, 100 people died." ~audience shrugs it off as part of life "...including 30 women." ~audience shudders with anger Here's a good video on this.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 07:45 PM
28

At the risk of getting sidetracked (the hitting and scratching part is covered here all the time), there's a lot to be said about the lopsided jealousy you mentioned. After all, what kind of attitude leads to thinking it's perfectly fine to claw you up but gosh forbid you ever retaliated? It's exactly the same kind of self-centered, egotistical, narcissistic, borderline sociopathic behavior with a different flavor. The problem isn't so much that girls/women/people can be nuts, but that for certa…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 07:37 PM
58

"I know I'm not welcome here I'll be gone in a minute I promise" As long as you have clear logical arguments, and have constructive criticism, post away. Completely agree with you on this. Feminists are most assuredly welcome here when using rational talk and not emotional logic. Varying opinions are abound here as it is and this should not be an echo chamber. "I think the main difference is ... are a direct response to the idea of constantly making women feel it's their responsibility alone to …
/r/MensRights07/01/16 04:34 PM

My issue has never been so much with the sociopaths but with the people who hand them a microphone and push them to the front of the stage. How/why are these individuals becoming the "voice of the people"? We already see this garbage trickling down into college campuses (supported by the staff). They get featured on the news as heroes (Sarkessian). And these Nazi toned rants are generally tolerated by the public.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 03:49 PM
27

Wow, those comments are a absolute trainwreck. i want one particular man to talk to me. It's always the nice ones who leave me alone. (But then if they talk to me are they still nice? Dilemma.) Translation: I am impossible to please and will find something wrong with everyone. I can't go with killing all men, since I have a great son who is the light of my life and a great partner, who surprises me in good ways every day. But I could go with killing all dudebros, that would be legit! Translation…
/r/MensRights25/12/15 02:06 AM
42

That's not a normal thought process. It is for some people. It's emotional reasoning at it's finest and it can be used to supplant logic and twist situations to any form one likes. In this case, it requires a few unofficial prerequisite beliefs such as that men always want sex, with anyone, at any time. That the victim in a M v. F situation will always be the F. And that something must be done about any injustice ever committed. Of course, if you flat out asked them these questions, you would ge…
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:29 PM
20

They should enjoy it while it lasts. People are getting hip to their game.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 04:52 AM
73

Most of those comments are foul mouthed young women, imagine that.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 01:04 AM
30

not just because of laziness, but because they aren't being rewarded for it I thinks it's actually way worse than that. Even the most simple of men (willing to work honest & hard for respectable pay/not looking for a pat on the back for it) can be utterly destroyed by failed marriages, child support, legal issues, and overall competition for even a meager piece of the pie. If a man falls or is pushed into a pit of desperation, there is virtually no escape. Women, of course, are largely immune fr…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 07:54 PM
14

"Satire" my ass, more like a documentary with actor portrayals. EDIT: The comments section from /r/videos is chock full of interesting stories about similar events.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 01:01 PM
255

Aghast, my 17-year-old son walked out. Less than two hours later, he went to choir practice, where he and his classmates practiced a parody of "Cell Block Tango" from the musical "Chicago" that features the “six merry murderesses of Cook County Jail” singing about killing their lovers. Here's one verse: Hah! He had it coming He had it coming He took a flower In its prime And then he used it And he abused it It was a murder But not a crime! Why don't they just take all the boys and girls into a r…
/r/MensRights25/11/15 04:52 PM
72

No, that's why they exist. You might think they would just start a 3rd Scouts for allowing both but we all know that's not the way this works.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 02:53 AM
26

Correct ALL the errors, turn them back in, and say you thought it was an assignment. Insist they grade it since you spent so much time on it. You'll either get an A+ or the most pride inducing F of all time. Make your views known, they sure are.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 07:24 AM
21

Don't joke. Today's absurdities are tomorrows realities. Surely, notarized pre-consent forms approved by a staff administrator with a small fee would come first though.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 08:59 PM
29

Anything with "___livesmatter" will come across as a parody of the other one. Something like "menmattertoo" would be fresher. Otherwise great idea, even if it just outs hypocrisy like how the man asking for a day on men's issues did so in Parliament.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 01:47 PM
28

"Too much baggage." It's starting to feel like this is the new "fat acceptance" campaign. Shaming men into dating even the nuttiest of women and making them wallow in guilt for not being attracted to it. Also what about all those nice male feminists, why aren't you trying to date them? I thought women didn't go for assholes. It's not like you might find them boring... 1000x this. It really drives the point home that what they say is not accurate. The part later in the article where someone else …
/r/MensRights27/10/15 01:24 PM

So I guess if she turned down a guy because he said he was a MRA and she better not pull any "crazy femnisst sh_t", it would be ok to call her a slut in an online article? Because that's essentially what she did.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 01:19 PM
30

I've noticed "nice guy" [to women] means "He's a good guy, but I don't want to date him, maybe someone else should?" & "_uckboy" (plus a lot of other name calling terms) mean "I feel obligated to call him something disgusting, but I actually very much want him to take me to bed, however I'm more than a tad pissed he doesn't want to." It's essentially trying to be something you are not, even when it conflicts with your actual desires and common sense. Plus something something selfish pride. Some …
/r/MensRights27/10/15 01:11 PM
65

This one (a different girl I believe), speaks even more about this mentality... “Honestly, even if they're supportive, even if they say all the right things, and really want to discuss my job, it makes me feel weird about hooking up with them,” Just let this statement, along with the others, coupled with the entire agenda soak in a minute.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 07:48 PM
18

You have accidentally stumbled on to something here. You see, THAT'S THE IDEA. In reality, this 10 minute method will never be practiced because even if men took it seriously, women would object or mock him at the moment. It just serves to demonize men for existing whenever it's convenient.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 01:23 PM
33

You don't fight an evil by adopting and practicing it. ~Ayn Rand
/r/MensRights07/09/15 11:58 AM
53

I found myself thinking there must at least one like you, and then here you are. We all know you would get arrested and probably public shaming to say the least, BUT, I couldn't help but think while listening to this... person, rant on about what a pile of shit this guy was (and knowing his deal from the title) that: If this woman starting doing this to the wrong person, not even a hateful or violent person, but an emotionally charged person, she might well get punched very very hard, consequenc…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 01:03 PM
7

What puzzles me most is that someone has the gall to say that having a fast paced, sweaty, difficult, and I'm sure not that well paying job (for the hours worked) is some kind of privilege. I have the distinct feeling at some point in the future, your average man will be told breathing air is a privilege (for them) due to the (to be established) fact that they are inferior beings who deserve nothing but a tortuous death by default.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 07:41 AM

I honestly wonder if it really would. “And he writhed inside at what seemed the cruelty and unfairness of the demand. He had not yet learned that if you do one good deed your reward usually is to do another and harder and better one.” ― C.S. Lewis
/r/MensRights21/08/15 06:04 PM
17

The problem is that they are convoluting the definitions of "object". plus a slew of other unethical debating techniques, whilst avoiding any debate at all. "Object" defined: 1 a material thing that can be seen and touched. (what they mean) "Object" defined: 2 a person or thing to which a specified action or feeling is directed. (what you mean)
/r/MensRights21/08/15 03:09 PM
29

Who wants to bet there will be people sympathizing with this woman Soon as I read the title I thought this immediately. And here's why... As far as absurd excuses for defending these acts go, this has got to be one of the most PC to exist. Certain people will be thinking subconsciously - a) Woman did bad = Must be man to blame - b) No females [important] harmed = Not really a monster - c) Did for girl's sake = Meant well. Hard to believe, but if one has more hate for men than love for children […
/r/MensRights19/08/15 06:02 AM

"You're such a nice guy. You're going to make some girl happy one day." Translation: Once a woman has had her fun with badboys, maybe accidentally slipped out a few kids, gained a few dozen pounds, and needs a stable provider, she'll pick you up for the late term run while maybe or maybe not being faithful. Just hang in there pal. In the meantime (till your mid 30's) don't watch porn, don't use strippers or prostitutes, and NEVER ask for sex. It'll pay off (for us, haha), we swear. Happy indeed.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 06:20 PM
23

What really got me here (aside from the fact these girls would probably flip nuts if their fiancé did anything remotely similar) was the whole "[even sort of] drunk girls can't consent" thing going around lately. By that logic, this stripper was a rapist 100 times over and should be serving a life sentence. Gosh forbid we hold someone (looking at the bride's to be here in particular) responsible for their own deplorable actions and quit pretending the big bad man is always to blame. Might as wel…
/r/MensRights09/08/15 06:56 PM
26

This honestly sounds like an SNL skit. Seriously, shouting "SEXISM!" because you are chilly at your cushy office job is just a new level of unbelievable.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 02:47 PM

Any suggestion outside of that narrow narrative boundary, is considered hateful. This is more or less how this link was provided to me. It is supposed "proof" that all MRAs (which is becoming a derogatory term for no real reason), therefore all posters/commenters/subscribers/viewers of this sub are by default, hateful. It just makes no sense.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 03:00 PM
7

It's right in the title. So it is. It's just so hard to believe that this passes for journalism.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 02:14 PM

Am I reading this right or is she saying not to blame groups for individual actions, then proceeds to do exactly that?
/r/MensRights28/07/15 02:04 PM
8

Glad you asked... Wikipedia YouTube
/r/MensRights27/07/15 07:07 PM
42

When you figure out how to convince women and/or feminists and/or society in general to accept a televised panel of men doing that, please proceed. In the meantime all we have is to point out hypocrisies and hold those who judge others to their own standards. If these giggling lady-girls or the network televising them had to worry about consequences for promoting this mentality (the way men would have to), you would probably see less pressure on men for the same type of things. It is far easier …
/r/MensRights27/07/15 04:51 PM
144

This episode from 2012 was much more honest about the matter. Seriously though, this is kind of old news and indeed beyond rage inducing.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 02:26 PM

Well the first response to that will be the old cliche that men abandon their wives and children.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 04:45 PM

What a waste of good airtime. She just kept bringing up domestic violence and abuse (which was NOT the topic) and he wasted all his time countering it. It was like watching two dogs fight over a chew toy because they are hungry.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 03:56 PM
76

Believe me, I completely understand your 1/2 empty glass approach but want to add a few things... Considering this man could have actually been convicted, this is a small victory. Considering the news actually reported it (factually) correctly, even more so. Considering they not only exonerated the man but did something to her, even MORE so. Yes, he probably had a bad time and will continue to suffer the effects but here's the slippery slope: If small (relative) victories are downplayed, pretty …
/r/MensRights25/07/15 03:53 PM

Thank you for noticing, and caring.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 04:44 PM
27

I noticed the ole' "real man" argument thrown in there.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 12:02 AM
17

You jest but this is an extremely widespread, all be it not vocalized as such, mentality.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 11:00 AM
4

This sounds familiar, let me try an /r/newsflip type deal here and swap some words for others... New witchcraft survey shows educated men think it's better to burn innocent women for sorcery they didn't commit than to let a guilty witch escape unpunished Wonder if they would still approve if it were their asses on the line?
/r/MensRights19/06/15 06:45 AM
115

woman starts attacking random man ~ "whoa." man puts his hand up to defend ~ "whoawhoawhoa chilchill" woman attacks random man more and pulls his hair ~ "silence" man stands up and finally fights back ~ "heyheyhey she's possesed" man is now retaliating in full ~ "call emergency, shit" [man tackled to ground] The overall attitude here is just nauseating. I'm sure if a "possesed man started attacking a woman, or even another man, things would have gone quite differently.
/r/PussyPass14/06/15 02:42 PM
10

Who said he has to be in attendance???
/r/MensRights27/05/15 04:16 PM
14

Womenarewonderful
/r/MensRights17/05/15 10:28 PM
29

This though process used to make sense. But current freedoms and cherry picking at ideals makes it seem ludicrous.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 02:43 PM
24

I had a feeling this was coming. Thanks for doing the legwork.
/r/PussyPass25/04/15 05:33 PM
27

How2become a star on pussypass... Step 1: Act like a crazed lunatic. Step 2: Have child become upset because of YOUR actions. Step 3: Get off the hook because kid is "having a fit." {terms & conditions: must own a vaginer} Classic.
/r/PussyPass05/02/15 03:51 PM
76

From comments: This video is shameful. The fact of the matter is men do not get assaulted, beaten and killed on a daily basis by women. The introduction of "harassment" in such a belittling way just demonstrates how males like to minimize and deny the point that far too many women are abused by men in this world and the threat is real and not something to be ridiculed. It is sad to see that this video chooses to mock the harassment of women on the street which is just part of a much larger probl…
/r/PussyPass27/01/15 03:39 PM
40

And you just know the vast majority of people will read that article and think to themselves, "Yeah, that kinda makes sense, those poor women."
/r/PussyPass07/11/14 06:08 AM
17

haha, just found this one in /r/nongolfers
/r/PussyPass11/08/14 05:05 PM
26

Well between this and the fact that the #1 post on /r/funny (#6 on all) is about the smiling woman who beat her husband with a golfclub, there seems to be huge potential to make a point today. EDIT: Now what brave soul will post that to /r/funny ?
/r/PussyPass11/08/14 03:13 PM
33

Do it.
/r/PussyPass11/08/14 02:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter