TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

l339 Archive

View 0 posts and 119 comments by l339 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Pussy as an insult does not come from the female gender, it actually comes from the old Latin word Pussimus (or something like that) meaning ‘weak mind/spirit’
/r/MensRights17/03/26 06:40 PM
2

Because the ‘chads’ are good looking lol, there is nothing special about that
/r/MensRights27/02/26 06:05 PM
0

I’m very sorry to hear that and I won’t invalidate your experience. I can believe that your situation is worse than the average woman, but I still stand by my word that on average this problem occurs more frequently with women than with men
/r/MensRights24/02/26 11:08 AM
1

I would have to think about that for a sec
/r/MensRights20/02/26 11:13 PM
5

No, but I think they happen on average to women more frequently
/r/MensRights20/02/26 04:49 PM
34

The period thing is actually pretty chill I think, not having huge stomach aches, random bleeding and random mood swings once a month sounds great honestly
/r/MensRights19/02/26 11:29 PM
1

Shame
/r/MensRights13/01/26 05:22 PM
1

Thank you, we would make a great couple based on our MB profiles
/r/MensRights11/01/26 06:17 PM
1

Then you just buy or make a new cake lol
/r/MensRights11/01/26 03:50 PM
2

Yes I would have it, because I ate it lol
/r/MensRights11/01/26 03:49 PM
-2

But then there has to be an expression better suited to explain this phenomenon. Because the have a cake and eat it too just makes no sense linguistically
/r/MensRights11/01/26 12:47 PM
-1

But I don’t have it for later, because I ate it lol
/r/MensRights11/01/26 12:22 AM
5

I am happy I’m not alone lol
/r/MensRights11/01/26 12:21 AM
-25

But I don’t want to have the cake lol. I just ate the cake, so I am fine
/r/MensRights11/01/26 12:20 AM
-33

But why would I want to ‘have’ a cake if I can just eat it. I’m already satisfied I’m able to eat the cake lol
/r/MensRights10/01/26 10:52 PM
-10

Yes I know, but I think the expression is wrong or confusing
/r/MensRights10/01/26 09:41 PM
-59

Why do people always use that expression, makes no sense. It you eat your cake, you’re already having it Edit: the amount of downvotes is crazy, especially considering there are enough people that agree with me that this expression doesn’t make sense
/r/MensRights10/01/26 08:52 PM
6

I just don’t understand why this is still a discussion. It’s like discussing the Earth being flat or vaccines causing autism, it just isn’t true so why try to make it sound true?
/r/MensRights21/12/24 11:07 PM
-2

Sociological and psychological research indicate that girls are actually more agreeable and compliant than me on average. Your argument to refute it ‘just because I feel that way’ isn’t very strong
/r/MensRights04/10/24 04:27 PM
3

But the thing is, the law and generally society doesn’t value a collection of child porn the same as an adult sending their nudes to a minor
/r/MensRights06/07/24 02:42 PM
-4

Didn’t read the article, but if the only thing she did was send nude photo’s then I don’t think she should deserve jail time. I do think she should be heavily fined, lose her job, get her name on the pedophile registry and never be allowed to work with children again
/r/MensRights06/07/24 12:15 PM
1

Really just avoid a lot lot of stuff here. A lot of stuff on Reddit is just political and depressing and everyone getting angry at everyone
/r/MensRights14/06/24 02:15 PM
-3

Better than nothing lol
/r/MensRights15/05/24 01:17 PM
7

I just looked into the rules and I don’t see how your mention breaks rule 3? Maybe post it again lol or talk to a mod to get more insight
/r/MensRights15/05/24 11:41 AM
1

Ah yes a Banga list
/r/MensRights08/05/24 02:25 PM
5

The second and third picture actually don’t get disproven by your Wikipedia search, you’ll need a different search for that
/r/MensRights14/04/24 05:54 PM
3

That Celeste Saulo sounds like an idiot and not a scientist at all
/r/MensRights20/02/24 03:29 AM
1

I think you should revise your arguments
/r/MensRights30/01/24 01:37 AM
-3

Sorry u/TheTinMenBlog but these arguments are pretty bad and doesn’t at all prove that slutshaming doesn’t exist. Firstly the study you cited was conducted in Norway, one of the most progressive societies on the planet. That’s like taking a climate change survey in China and then claiming climate change isn’t an issue for people. Secondly the US survey (not even a study) only covers ideal partners for marriage from the perspective of the opposite sex. Doesn’t say anything of situations outside o…
/r/MensRights30/01/24 01:35 AM
8

You need to take an ultimatum here, also for your own dignity. I would’ve not given into the demands of my father and just done what’s right
/r/MensRights04/12/23 08:17 PM
22

Actually hunting is specifically an endurance task, that’s why we were able to make it so far as a species. No other animal other than humans can run and endure for so long. We were effective as hunters because we would track down prey and never let it rest and then kill it when it was tired. The prey we hunter was stronger and faster than us, so we used other tactics
/r/MensRights28/11/23 09:48 PM
1

That’s an argument you can make, but I think that that’s a different argument from the one I’m trying to make
/r/MensRights02/08/23 10:06 PM
1

I’m gonna play devils advocate here and say that your argument that men are more susceptible to violent crimes that women based on the statistics is a survivorship bias argument. The statistic doesn’t take into account when and where the violent crimes occur the most frequently and it might just be that men put themselves in these positions far more often than women. Let’s say all violent crimes occur at night and during the night 1000 men are out and 500 get assaulted. That’s 50%. Let’s say dur…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 09:35 PM
-15

Why are stupid Fox News esque articles like this posted here? It diminishes the value of this sub and the movement in general
/r/MensRights11/06/23 11:41 AM
-7

Yes… That’s why I’m replying lmao Can you read the comment I’ve replied to?
/r/MensRights27/05/23 01:00 PM
-2

Sure bro, whatever you want I don’t care
/r/MensRights27/05/23 01:00 PM
-10

The knobhead clarified he was British yes. Also having a knobhead police in a western country is quite American yes
/r/MensRights27/05/23 10:43 AM
-7

Quite the opposite actually
/r/MensRights27/05/23 10:41 AM
-9

I’m not replying to the post, I’m replying to a comment
/r/MensRights27/05/23 10:06 AM
-36

Read what?
/r/MensRights27/05/23 09:38 AM
-14

No, but linking violent behavior to police sounds very American to me
/r/MensRights27/05/23 09:38 AM
-77

Cops in the UK are violent without guns? Lol
/r/MensRights27/05/23 08:27 AM
-30

Please read and comprehend. The comment I’m replying to is such an American statement
/r/MensRights27/05/23 08:27 AM
-139

How to tell people you’re American without telling them you’re American
/r/MensRights27/05/23 01:46 AM
14

He dragged it here to point out you’re a hypocrite. My god you are dense
/r/MensRights08/05/23 09:59 PM
3

So a female judge giving the man less rights in a family court is the fault of the man?
/r/MensRights23/04/23 02:45 AM
10

I agree with most points you’ve mentioned, but I disagree with you that dating has become easier, because it hasn’t. It’s not just the standard changing due to socio-economic status, it’s the standard changing, because women have gotten more options and this makes it harder for men to find someone. This increase in options is simply due to social media and has nothing to do with anything but physical attributes
/r/MensRights19/04/23 10:07 AM
15

I agree with this so much. Lived in America for a few years and while it’s easier to find hook-ups, the whole dating scene is way more toxic, sneaky and exhausting and it all comes from the the female side. It’s like women in America are childish and don’t know how to communicate. Finding an actual meaningful partner is much better in Europe
/r/MensRights11/04/23 03:30 AM
2

Into people with self respect lol
/r/MensRights21/02/23 10:24 PM
1

But are you going to take a stance?
/r/MensRights15/02/23 08:53 PM
-11

But still people outside the US have no idea what the state abbreviations are
/r/MensRights07/02/23 03:55 PM
-15

r/USdefaultism
/r/MensRights07/02/23 02:43 PM
5

That could be sexist
/r/MensRights25/01/23 10:40 AM
2

The old legendary saying
/r/MensRights21/11/22 01:02 AM
22

She actually did mention 2 (sort of) privileges men have over women: they’re judged less if they don’t want children (that’s because people care less about men) and men are less likely to be judged when sleeping with a lot of people
/r/MensRights21/11/22 12:28 AM
6

I understand the assumption, but I don’t think they treated you this way just because you’re a man. It’s a special needs school and I understand them being cautious if you’re not the person your niece was expecting
/r/MensRights05/11/22 12:15 AM
1

That’s a fair take, but I fail to see how that’s specifically a gender issue that needs to be posted here. It seems more like an issue OP’s wife has
/r/MensRights31/10/22 06:03 PM
1

It’s broken plate, not a fucking oven that fell on someone. Common consensus is that someone wouldn’t injure themselves badly when breaking a plate. It can happen, but it’s really rare. Furthermore if I were to break something and I was physically injured, I would tell my wife about that ASAP lol. You’re still on the plane crash, it’s still not comparable at all. You’re just looking for a way to defend OP, when there isn’t much to defend in terms of male rights
/r/MensRights31/10/22 05:46 PM
0

You’re comparing a broken plate to an aircraft crashing, wtf? That’s not a good comparison at all lmao
/r/MensRights31/10/22 12:52 PM
-2

Post it on relationshipadvice or something like that. Honestly I get why people wouldn’t have his back. He’s complaining that his wife doesn’t check if he’s okay, which seems kinda stupid, because he probably looks fine and it’s just a plate breaking, not someone’s arm. Also his wife is angry at him for not listening to her advice to not heat the plates, again completely reasonable. He’s just being dramatic and making a sexist issue out of it like a feminist would. And you guys are perpetuating …
/r/MensRights31/10/22 09:58 AM
-2

Bro, you’re really reaching with this. Her treatment of you might be unfair, but it really doesn’t have anything to do with your gender. You’re posting this on the wrong sub
/r/MensRights31/10/22 12:04 AM
9

Diversity doesn’t always lead to successful teams. Like I said often times companies would hire more women to either fill a quota or to become more diversified, but this then often leads to the overall skillset of the team becoming lower. A great example is a friend of mine who owns a restaurant with a bar attached to it. At the bar originally only guys were working. Then he thought it would be a good idea to hire more women for behind the bar. Turns out that that was a bad idea for productivity…
/r/MensRights30/10/22 10:07 AM
46

I’ll bite. Feminism has hurt me personally in the workforce, where I have applied for jobs where I heard multiple times that they would like to hire me, but unfortunately they were under pressure by management to fill a quota of a certain amount of women for ‘diversification’. I’ve seen business go down in quality as well, because they filled a certain quota and the skills of the women they hired weren’t on par with the men
/r/MensRights30/10/22 01:03 AM
5

I think you lack some critical thinking skills or you’re too blinded by your own narrative. Normalizing homosexuality is not the same as pushing the narrative that there much be gay characters in shows, especially where their whole identity relies on being gay. Now I don’t have a problem with either of these points, but just simply someone criticizing a specific agenda like that there much be gay characters in a show isn’t homophobic by itself
/r/MensRights20/10/22 09:44 AM
2

Lmao if this is your way of showing courtesy, then I really can’t see how anybody would ever want to work or talk with you irl. You’re telling me to mind my own business, but you’re the one coming here and starting arguments with people. You’re unwilling to accept the faults in your argumentative skills and as a courtesy I’m trying to give you advice. Take this advice I’m trying to give you, instead of being stubborn and thinking you know everything better. My DM’s are open if you want to talk m…
/r/MensRights05/08/22 06:24 PM
2

I’m trying to advice you, but you’re being incredibly stubborn. If you don’t care about men’s rights, then why comment at all? You’re not trying to hold a discussion it seems, you just want to troll
/r/MensRights05/08/22 05:05 PM
2

Other people have done it before me
/r/MensRights05/08/22 04:14 PM
2

The answers aren’t circular, you just are reading and understanding them
/r/MensRights05/08/22 08:24 AM
2

It’s true that it’s more likely to belong to a minority group, but that doesn’t exclude a situation where men can indeed be oppressed simply for being men. I feel like that’s something you’re not exactly getting
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:01 AM
10

The reason you’re getting downvotes is not because you’re asking questions, but it’s because your line of reasoning as counterarguments is really had and very linear. I think it helps a lot to read the honest and sincere replies to your comments and really just take a moment to understand what is being said, because the way you word your comments it seems like you aren’t actually reading and understanding the replies
/r/MensRights05/08/22 12:40 AM
3

With that kind of statement you can argue that nobody, eg woman and minorities, are oppressed, because the whole group isn’t oppressed. I get what you’re trying to say and factually you are correct, but it literally adds nothing to the discussion and only harms individuals who are actually being oppressed
/r/MensRights05/08/22 12:36 AM
2

And I said it should be democratically chosen through votes and I don’t personally think I have a say in it
/r/MensRights27/07/22 03:30 AM
4

Can you not read? I said that both sides had valid arguments as well as that it should be decided by democratic vote. Those are both opinions I hold which aren’t common and mean something
/r/MensRights27/07/22 02:41 AM
2

It depends how you word it if you would call me either neither or both. I think it should be up to a democratic vote to have abortion legalized or not, preferably separated by state
/r/MensRights26/07/22 11:38 PM
4

I am neither pro-life and pro-choice, I think both sides are valid and have compelling arguments, so I can’t choose one side over the other
/r/MensRights26/07/22 11:29 PM
19

So the thing is that your claim is not coherent at all, unless you come with factual evidence for that 80%. Without the evidence, it’s just bs what you’re spouting
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:35 AM
10

Honestly even if it’s real, it sounds more like either a bad joke or a petty comment and nothing significant. Can’t even remotely say that this sub hates women because of a stupid comment someone posted
/r/MensRights05/01/22 11:35 AM
14

Can you give examples, because I genuinely haven’t see a single post here hating on women for no particular reason
/r/MensRights05/01/22 07:51 AM
2

Read your own stuff you post man
/r/MensRights06/10/21 03:19 PM
6

A patriarchy exists to specifically benefit men, if it wouldn’t then it’s a failed patriarchy
/r/MensRights03/10/21 04:48 PM
7

I’ve read the articles and all the links mentioned in this comment. It’s very loose and stills doesn’t provide proof that the patriarchy exists. I’ll all based of ‘I feel like…’ which isn’t substantial
/r/MensRights03/10/21 04:47 PM
6

I don’t disagree that a women has the right to do with her body what she wants, but equally a man should also have the right to choose to raise a child or to walk away. Also I’ve never mentioned that sex was a right, so idk what you’re on about with that
/r/MensRights29/09/21 05:24 PM
9

Jezus Christ you’re insufferable. Just a heads up sweetie, child birth isn’t the worst suffering a human can go through, not even close. If that was the case nobody would ever have kids to begin with
/r/MensRights29/09/21 03:38 PM
8

Sex takes 2 to participate in, both are equally responsible
/r/MensRights29/09/21 03:32 PM
11

That sounds incredibly hypocritical. Basically what you’re saying is that if a woman had an unwanted pregnancy, she should be able to have a choice to abort because it’s her body. But if the same happens to a man they just need to suck it up and help raise the child? Where is the fairness in that?
/r/MensRights29/09/21 03:31 PM
3

You’d be surprised, popular male twitch streamers and esports players have loads of fangirls
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/09/21 03:13 PM
36

There are literally championships for debating. Of course there are winners and losers
/r/MensRights25/06/21 08:59 PM
-6

Dude what’s the problem with this? He’s everything she’s looking for, but she doesn’t feel it? That can happen, why is that a problem?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/06/21 11:34 AM
1

I’m going to be honest, even if the person is accused and acquitted guilty, that persons name should never be released to the media
/r/MensRights09/06/21 11:17 PM
0

Wtf is a ‘cucklord’ lmao
/r/MensRights31/05/21 01:26 AM
1

I mean I do get how people make the confusion, that’s how most feminists also derived to that conclusion
/r/MensRights31/05/21 12:31 AM
0

It’s not a real word lmao, just like ‘cucklord’
/r/MensRights31/05/21 12:18 AM
1

Except mansplaining is actually a gender neutral term, containing both men and women being able to exhibit this behavior. Only feminists (and you I guess) think it exclusively contains men and that is by definition false
/r/MensRights31/05/21 12:17 AM
-4

And what would be it’s definition? Lmao
/r/MensRights30/05/21 11:53 PM
-4

Womensplaining is not a word
/r/MensRights30/05/21 11:36 PM
0

I have no idea what you’re saying
/r/MensRights30/05/21 11:34 PM
-10

I’m gonna be honest though, this was borderline mansplaining, only the condescending tone was missing. But basically every word you said in your explanation is basic information
/r/MensRights30/05/21 05:10 PM
4

Also he must 100% devote his life to making you happy, otherwise you’re a ‘pick me’ lol
/r/MensRights18/05/21 07:27 PM
1

Calling yourself a panromantic asexual is more logical that calling you both bi- and asexual, but that depends if the other person knows what a panromantic is. Even if you don’t enjoy sex, if you feel a physical sexual attraction towards both genders then you’re bisexual, if you don’t, but feel romantic attraction towards both genders then I’d just call yourself a pansexual or panromantic (which I think makes a lot of sense)
/r/MensRights12/05/21 05:41 PM
2

Mate, you can’t be bisexual and asexual at the same time, that’s not how it works... Either you’re sexually attracted to both genders or not at all
/r/MensRights12/05/21 08:04 AM
2

Honestly that post just feels like an easy karma farming post. Like the majority of people agree with it, it’s like saying people would rather be rich than poor
/r/MensRights09/05/21 11:02 PM
25

Interesting to note, but the subreddit also automatically deleted any post regarding the hardships of either being a man or being white
/r/MensRights19/04/21 02:42 AM
31

Even men without options
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/01/21 04:07 AM
2

Can’t read the article without subscribing. Anybody willing to post the story in the comments?
/r/MensRights25/12/20 02:47 AM
1

There are some logical fallacies here and there, but there are also some good arguments coming out of this
/r/MensRights20/11/20 01:21 PM
1

Just for me personally I’d rather avoid these kinds of pages purely because I feel like it just makes me angry seeing the kind of posts MAPs make online. So I’d rather not follow them because it just makes me be in an angry mood
/r/MensRights10/10/20 12:58 AM
2

So why do you follow this group OP?
/r/MensRights09/10/20 11:58 AM
-6

I think that has more to do with popularity than the standard gender roles
/r/MensRights13/11/19 09:53 AM
2

It’s the idea in society that men are the most privileged group of people, so people get disgusted when talking about their rights in the same sense as people don’t like billionaires talking about how they deserve tax cuts
/r/MensRights22/08/19 03:38 PM
14

This is more than just free speech, it’s promoting violence
/r/MensRights02/07/19 10:07 AM
1

Also a reason why I don’t watch the MSL, the level is just too low, especially since I have other options like the CL
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/19 10:53 AM
146

But they don’t and it never will. Generally people don’t like to watch amateur level football if higher levels are available
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/19 04:50 PM
230

Nobody would believe them
/r/MensRights12/06/19 06:19 PM
0

The second part is quite sexist man, just because someone is a women doesn’t mean that person would do less of a job than a man
/r/MensRights10/04/19 08:35 AM
11

What’s her name?
/r/MensRights01/03/19 03:35 PM
2

Yes it does, it only helps contribute to sexism
/r/MensRights19/01/19 02:21 PM
6

Except that what Milo is saying is simply his freedom of speech and not being racist or sexist in a way. This ad is being sexist.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 08:37 AM
10

Of course we watched the advertisement. It doesn’t matter if you think it’s ‘not that bad’. It’s still about generalizing men m and that has happened for years. It’s still a bad ad that only contributes to sexism in society.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 08:35 AM
67

I feel like this is a very American thing. Here in the Netherlands we can just have normal conversations and flirt with girls without being called a sexual predator. In America females need to sign a fucking consent form for males to be able to prove they weren’t harassing a girl
/r/MensRights03/01/19 10:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter