TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

labiaflutteringby Archive

View 0 posts and 94 comments by labiaflutteringby on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

That was closer to a tombstone piledriver, what with the way he turned her upside down
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/17 09:39 AM
-1

its not alleged by the article, he was probably drunk and exaggerating
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/17 06:16 AM
-12

I don't think so
/r/PussyPassDenied28/01/17 01:27 PM
-14

They sliced vegetables over him lol. jeez by the title you'd think they rammed a cucumber up his ass. Enjoy your time off girls
/r/PussyPassDenied28/01/17 12:06 PM
2

I seen a sexy pic of her back when she had a normal haircut, brunette I think. Nice butt too
/r/PussyPass05/01/17 10:07 AM
5

I hope she stops doing drugs and finds a nice man, really do
/r/PussyPass04/01/17 10:30 PM
0

We're not disagreeing though, you're just deflecting because everybody knows /r/pussypassdenied is beatingwomen-lite :3
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/16 09:35 PM
-1

So she's cocky. No pussy pass involved
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/16 10:12 AM
6

He claims to have been poor himself, it's weird that he said this. I'm thinking he just wanted to catch the attention of Michigan voters, and turn the conversation where he's the strongest: inequality. No matter what kind of argument it creates, its drawing attention to where his platform is the most prepared. Almost a Trump-like move, but also a little bit like standard racist Democratic pandering.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 11:36 AM
-15

Apply that kind of logic to every other 7 second video on youtube and see where it gets you.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/15 07:25 PM
-17

That's very weak inductive reasoning, that's why I'm skeptical
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/15 06:52 PM
-18

given the source of this video and the lack of context, i don't think we can draw the conclusion that these are actually random people
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/15 06:43 PM
-33

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1ZDGJpyFdo My interpretation: this guy is a stripper named andre who likes to make funny vids on youtube
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/15 02:06 PM
8

Argentina has a really weird and unfortunate history with gender tension. Got some tough bitches over there
/r/PussyPass29/10/15 04:49 PM
0

the best part is how believable it is. yeah women do some pretty crazy shit in the name of feminism, i'd better just believe everything i read on tumblr from blogs named misandry mermaid
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/15 12:10 AM
0

they do, and then people invent thought terminating cliches like "right you were just PRETENDING to be retarded" and "People like that really exist!" to make themselves feel better, while at the same time ensuring that they are infinitely duped forever
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/15 11:44 PM
11

100% truth. Feminism is deployed as a wedge issue by conservative shills, lol. Makes me even more suspicious of how anti-feminism has been canvassed on reddit in the last 4 years but woah I'm in the wrong subreddit to be saying that kind of shit
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/15 10:41 PM
26

You mean the Jeb Bush intern pretending to be a feminist
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/15 10:05 PM
-11

WOW SHEBOONS QUARANTINED
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/15 09:42 AM
-1

There was literally less than a second between her first punch and his. Judging by the video there's a good chance the officers didn't even see it
/r/PussyPass20/09/15 11:58 PM
-4

Because she was getting her ass kicked?
/r/PussyPass20/09/15 11:57 PM
-10

Yeah I see a pretty fair punch-for-punch transaction going on here, plus a few officers just doing their job
/r/PussyPass20/09/15 12:27 PM
4

She's just a great manipulator. Like a feminist Donald Trump. She gets fired, files a frivolous lawsuit, and she spins it so it looks like she's some feminist martyr fighting important battles.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/15 11:34 AM
-14

If I saw a doe attacking a bear in the woods I'd probably not be too concerned for the bear either lol. His reaction to her is funny up until the point she grabbed the 2x4.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/15 05:54 AM
2

So female privilege is documented here, but not discussed? Maybe you need some rules against dissent if you want a circlejerk
/r/PussyPass12/09/15 05:38 PM
29

A month later, Herbie Boudreau, her father, who allegedly put up the hit money, is also charged with the same offence. Is it just me or does it sound like that family is into some organized crime type shit? Pussy pass + mafia connections sounds like an easy ticket out of charges like this. The article fails to mention that the father cracked the guy in the head with a steel pipe, and was charged with assault, not long before he put up the money for a hitman.
/r/PussyPass11/09/15 11:19 PM
23

hindu puffin
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/15 10:19 PM
1

that wasn't meant to excuse the problem. A guy died from a failure to detect meningitis, which happens too often. It sounds like the medic's fault, in this case. The guy's wife said he seemed impatient, like they were "wasting his time." FTA: he was "exhausted" from working over the Christmas and New Year period. He added that he should have administered penicillin and called for a priority one ambulance response sooner. "when feminism kills" - More like when people can't do their job and make m…
/r/MensRights13/08/15 11:48 PM
0

oh
/r/MensRights13/08/15 11:38 PM
-6

If a neckbeard died from a diabetic mountain dew overdose and a feminist had dismissed his symptoms as 'manstruation', there'd be a subcommittee formed to lead the investigation into the entire gynosphere, and the name of the feminist would be smeared over days of reddit meme coverage. A snack overdose is an acute, deadly, and delicious condition. Male gender activism is a chronic condition that responds better to early treatment but can still be survived if it gets treated within a reasonable p…
/r/MensRights13/08/15 02:07 PM
0

Nope. edit: downvotes? really, reddit?
/r/MensRights13/08/15 11:02 AM
-2

you sound like some kinda san fran freak
/r/MensRights13/08/15 01:45 AM
-4

umm, PMS only affects women?
/r/MensRights13/08/15 01:32 AM
-8

You swapped the words and thus changed the meaning. You can wiggle your own idiocy :)
/r/MensRights12/08/15 11:58 PM
1

I was technically correct, but throwing in "know your place" while being condescending toward a woman is why I got upvotes here. Trust me, I'm a scientist
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/15 11:08 PM
-8

No gender bias, right. A male could totally get told he has PMS instead of ovarian cancer
/r/MensRights12/08/15 11:07 PM
-52

Hey blame the commenter I replied to if you don't think PMS is a fair comparison. Fact is thousands die from ovarian cancer, and it has been misdiagnosed as PMS or IBS. IBS is comparable to man flu in that it doesn't mean 'nothings wrong' but rather 'You're displaying symptoms but its nothing serious".
/r/MensRights12/08/15 02:45 PM
-85

1) still a deadly condition 2) medical professionals either way 3) the person I replied to specifically used 'PMSing' as an example 4) ctrl + f 'menstrual'
/r/MensRights12/08/15 02:22 PM
-109

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2561577/Why-did-long-women-learn-cancer-They-fobbed-months-years-wrong-diagnoses-The-consequences-devastating.html That didnt seem to happen when ovarian cancer was being misdiagnosed as IBS or PMS.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 09:40 AM
24

You are being downvoted because you think you're so great for knowing your place
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/15 08:12 AM
4

Sounds like they "respect the independence of the Union and their democratic processes" to me
/r/PussyPassDenied29/05/15 05:16 PM
7

The union in question is run entirely by students. She's not employed by Goldsmith University, she's just getting a cut of the funding as decided by students. About 150 of the 8000 students voted to kick her out, which wasn't enough apparently.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/05/15 02:32 PM
0

I guess that's all you can expect from a judge named Humphrey in the town of Sudsbury
/r/PussyPass28/05/15 05:35 AM
9

well duh, the patriarchal CIA kickstarted the crack trade, everybody knows that
/r/PussyPass23/05/15 11:34 AM
-3

...because she doesn't star in a show on TLC? She still got plenty of heat for it. It's the first thing that comes up when you google her.
/r/PussyPass22/05/15 11:22 PM
4

yeah, I feel like I'm hearing about 342 women with no sense of self preservation
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 06:21 PM
1

How is it morally wrong for a 17 year old to take a picture of their body? You just keep saying it's illegal therefor it must be wrong. The kids were punished due to the disrespect they showed for the privacy of others, not for the fact that the pornography was technically illegal. The girls who produced it were reprimanded for risking their own privacy, not for producing something illegal.
/r/PussyPass28/04/15 09:41 AM
1

If production and distribution of Child Porn wasn't illegal, we wouldn't even be having this discussion Revenge porn wouldn't be controversial if this were true. Its the same scenario, the same concern for privacy, but with adults.
/r/PussyPass28/04/15 08:44 AM
1

just do this: If teenager #1 sent a nude picture to teenager #2, and teenager #2 then puts that picture up on Instagram without permission, would you still be saying that these two teenagers did something equivalent in terms of wrongness? your answer seems to be "yes because they're both trading child pornography" that's like saying saying pharmacies are bad because they deal drugs i feel like you're ignoring the immorality of posting someone's nudes on the internet without consent
/r/PussyPass27/04/15 06:41 PM
-1

Last I checked, 17 year olds don't get convicted under harsh child pornography laws for having naked pictures of their friends, regardless of gender. Nobody in this story did anyway.
/r/PussyPass27/04/15 04:29 PM
-1

The problem isn't just the distribution of nude photos. It's the non consensual distribution of the photos. Child pornography laws were designed to harshly punish adults who sexually exploit children. Trying to simplify it as "distributing child pornography," ignores the agency of the teenagers we're talking about. If you would, forget about the whole "child pornography" thing for a minute. If adult #1 sent a nude picture to adult #2, and adult #2 then puts that picture up on Instagram without p…
/r/PussyPass27/04/15 04:26 PM
5

lol i just had this exact conversation in another thread about this. Why do people keep bringing up child pornography laws if everyone involved is under 18?
/r/MensRights27/04/15 02:49 PM
-3

Why is that suddenly the question? You said one was "worse" than the other. Analyzing this situation from a legal standpoint is a headache. Even ignoring the fact that they're children, you end up with revenge porn. Non-consensual distribution of nude photos is a tough one. As far as who actually did the "worse" thing... I think it's the kids who publicly distributed nudes of their classmates without proper consent.
/r/PussyPass27/04/15 02:38 PM
0

Only for lack of distinction. It doesn't say "and children possessing/sharing nude pictures of themselves are just as bad as pedophiles"
/r/PussyPass27/04/15 02:06 PM
1

A child sharing pictures of herself, by her own free will, isn't being exploitative.
/r/PussyPass27/04/15 12:30 PM
9

Given that they were illegal and were reading a news story about it, I'm sure they're gone already. I'm sure as hell not typing that into google to find out, tho
/r/PussyPass27/04/15 12:25 PM
0

I wouldn't say that's even. That's private sharing vs public distribution
/r/PussyPass27/04/15 12:15 PM
14

What's retarded is them putting the name of the actual account in the article. You know, just in case any pedos missed out on the action and want to look it up
/r/PussyPass27/04/15 12:04 PM
31

The boys had actually put them up on instagram and twitter. Check the original article this one links to
/r/PussyPass27/04/15 11:16 AM
-1

They are repeating a lie to push their agenda. You keep repeating that, yet there's no evidence. The wage gap statistic itself is fine. It measures exactly what it means to. The conclusions some people draw from it are what you have a problem with, because they usually do it out of ignorance of what the statistic has and hasn't accounted for. The gap is not caused by sex, but because the sexes have different abilities and make different choices. True, especially the 'make different choices' part…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 12:36 AM
-1

That's not evidence for purposeful misinformation. Part of feminism is getting women in the workforce, which in turn will narrow that gap. The issues get conflated often. And it says nothing about your claim that the goal is to push discrimination against men. That reads more like a suspicion than an accusation.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 12:04 AM
-1

Its pretty clear based on the evidence. What evidence is there that this data is being willfully distorted and presented to people, with the end goal being to push discrimination against men?
/r/MensRights16/04/15 11:49 PM
-1

All people who believe that in my experience support the right of women not the be in the kitchen if they choose not to. Expectations are powerful. Especially if your boss secretly thinks you'd be a better fit as a stay-at-home wife. The pay gap myth is not based on ignorance. Its a wilful misrepresentation of reality to push discrimination against men. are you sure about this extraordinary claim? seems a little crazy.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 11:36 PM
-5

Also the hardest to back up, or even recognize if you share the same biases.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 10:58 PM
-1

And in no way sexist or anti-feminist. Sexist? No. Anti-feminist & ignorant of women's issues? Yes. I took the president of the united states as an example. How much more mainstream can t get? You did not. The pay gap myth isn't sexist, it's ignorant. No hate there. Same deal with the rape issue and patriarchal theory. Anti-feminism is not an ideology. Its a rejection of a position. Many people reject feminism on the basis of sexism, ie 'women's place is in the home', or 'women lie to ruin men's…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 10:58 PM
-1

I just had a lot of trouble parsing your comment, so I shitposted out of panic. Standard reddit procedure. ps call me a SJW again. it makes you seem really clever
/r/MensRights16/04/15 10:47 PM
-2

Rand Paul thinks so too. Maybe you should vote for him.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 10:39 PM
1

Sorry, didn't realize I was making you mad. I just don't think those issues show an inherent hate for men. Ignorance, sure, but hate? Anyway, here's some equally ignorant statements from the other side: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CAq-V09UUAAV1Pt.jpg All I'm saying is that the actual sexist ideas of feminism, such as 'men are barbaric', find their mirrors pretty easily within anti-feminist circles, and that dismissing them seems disingenuous. No true anti-feminist...
/r/MensRights16/04/15 10:36 PM
-1

Show me a university official or an elected feminist politician who purports that all men are inherently sexist or some other social justice nonsense. I'll show you elected politicians who think women's place is in the home, and tell female rape victims to 'calm their shit, yo'
/r/MensRights16/04/15 10:11 PM
-5

the red pill?
/r/MensRights16/04/15 10:01 PM
-5

Right, so the observation that many anti-feminists tend to be sexist is valid also.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 09:34 PM
-7

The stereotype of the anti-male feminist who wants to end men isn't limited to small MRA subreddits.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 09:12 PM
-1

True enough. She just doesn't seem to target feminists as her audience, but rather people who are already opposed to feminism. Personally I'd like to see her tackle some common anti-feminist misconceptions, since they make the bulk of her audience. Might as well quell the divisive rhetoric from both ends, right?
/r/MensRights16/04/15 08:15 PM
1

Honest question, what has CH Sommers done for feminism? All she seems to do is criticize other feminists
/r/MensRights16/04/15 07:16 PM
-4

The MRA circlejerks exist but I think other MRAs are quick to call them out and I don't think they are going to acquire power. That's not very comforting. Feminists say the same thing about radical feminist who want to kill all men, yet I hear MRAs complain about them all the time.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 07:10 PM
9

Shoutout to /r/FeMRADebates
/r/MensRights16/04/15 07:07 PM
-1

And she apologized to that person. Why shouldn't she have told the story if she thought it was true? It was a completely relevant response to the question: When I was interviewed by Levo, they asked me “Do you remember a time you were paid less for the same job?” And she doesn't call her critics maniacs, she calls people criticizing feminism on her behalf maniacs: To the maniacs who want to use this as a chit against women’s issues, I ask that you please don’t. Because that would be super shitty…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:35 PM
-2

she would have screamed it from the heavens. I guess you're an expert on Silverman's behavior? Instead, she "misremembers" why she was at the club in the first place, including why she was paid so little She didn't know why she was being paid less at the time. Read the statement. her "apology" was "I shouldn't have said this guy's name" Because her apology was to Martin, who she wrongly accused of paying her less than she was worth. If you want an apology for this instance of feminism being supp…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:10 PM
-10

There you go. This presentation is terrible, but all the cheap comments saying "Oh so I can rape a toaster/vibrator/car then?" completely miss the point.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 04:26 PM
-10

The opening question is "When does a robot stop being a thing and become someone?" She doesn't assert that having sex with inanimate objects is rape. The stock image is pretty distasteful, but I'm not a politically correct kind of person so I don't much care.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 03:55 PM
3

can't tell if false flag or not. damn poe's law
/r/MensRights16/04/15 03:45 PM
-3

Healthy cynicism, I guess. edit: cyn·i·cism an inclination to believe that people are motivated purely by self-interest; skepticism.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 03:35 PM
7

That first sentence is taken as a divine truth in any Salon article, as far as I can tell. They weren't using anything about this story to support it. That paragraph mainly seems to say "Bickering about anecdotes like these tends to obscure the real issue"
/r/MensRights16/04/15 03:33 PM
-4

Do tell, I'm actually curious.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 03:08 PM
-5

This is what I thought when this story first cropped up, before Silverman responded to Martin. People were already accusing her of lying. And I'm like, "For what?" What purpose would lying have here?
/r/MensRights16/04/15 03:02 PM
-11

(Can't see the vid, but my take would be: Not an issue unless you are dealing with an AI, and an AI could say no.) pretty much sums up this whole thread. Yes, the video is about rape in terms of AI. Why is everybody talking about having sex with inanimate objects?
/r/MensRights16/04/15 02:52 PM
0

I just miss when shitty journalists and sensationalist headlines were called out on reddit. I feel like the author has done something worse than who she's reporting on here by carelessly fanning the flames. At best, she's ignorant of what she's reporting on because she couldn't be bothered to read the statement. At worst, she's lying on purpose to get more hits.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 02:29 PM
96

She was trying to use the ol' "subtle misogyny" angle. Where even you, a male who does everything right and treats people with respect, can still be an instrument of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 01:31 PM
100

It makes me wonder why the headline is blatantly lying. She doesn't admit to 'making it up' anywhere, in fact she explicitly says: Oh goodness. All I can say is I remember that story exactly how I said it. Read her full statement. edit: Might have something to do with this author's history of clickbait journalism. "Is fracking a feminist issue?" and "I actually went to Starbucks and asked about racial issues. This is what happened" are such riveting pieces.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 01:28 PM
17

Ironically, most of the headlines about this story are false. She didn't admit to lying. Oh goodness. All I can say is I remember that story exactly how I said it Then when Todd pointed out that he received 60 dollars for the same spot I went back inside and asked Al why Todd got sixty dollars and I got ten. That’s when he certainly could have said “Because it was a guest spot, Sarah. I was just being super nice and gave you ten dollars for cab money.” But instead, (and I will always remember th…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/15 01:23 PM
4

She has already changed the policies about posting pics since february. Because protecting the honour of sluts is apparently a priority in reddit. That's actually more about creepshots and photos taken off facebook.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 06:16 AM
14

I'm a feminist and similar things have happened to me on reddit. Doxxing isn't ever acceptable.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 11:37 AM
42

A lot of them were probably hot at first. They know exactly when they can stop caring about their appearance. The ol' bait and switch.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/15 07:04 PM
3

Problem with the red pill's idea of 'alpha' is that it encourages cool emotional detachment. Due to selection bias, your alphas are going to be callous, skilled manipulators, generally having less natural regard for other people's emotions than your average person. There is no innate problem with having social hierarchy, nor with that hierarchy being gamed by sociopaths. Whether that hierarchy is a problem is purely a matter of ideology. Right now TRP ideals are being threatened by ideas of equa…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/15 08:33 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter