TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

laccase Archive

View 0 posts and 80 comments by laccase on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

There is a pattern here. Denying it is counterproductive. There seems to be a pattern in the places you attended school and worked. Or, you may be operating under confirmation bias. I only suspect the second because you use: ratio of girls to men If you're comfortable answering, what field are you in? In my two fields of study, at the grad level, the women are doing amazingly well gradewise, and the percentage of women is getting close to 50%. In the undergrad classes, there are fewer women, but…
/r/MensRights10/02/13 06:48 PM
6

I've also seen guys in my engineering classes complain about having the girl (the only one) as a partner, without ever having met her. She's actually a killer programmer. I've seen far too many of my peers assume that women are incompetent until proven otherwise.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 04:27 AM
1

Out of curiosity, why is the default that someone would speak lengthily about a topic without expertise in the area? That sounds like an illogical setup. Why is it the default that a person in disagreement would interrupt another person who is speaking? From the women in my life, I've heard that the default for them is a strange balance between coming off as reasonably intelligent, but also not "flaunting" their intelligence. I've also wandered around 2x before, and there was a compelling post a…
/r/MensRights10/02/13 04:25 AM
0

Feminists in germany helped block the ban That's appalling. But I also can't find a reference to it. Did they really do that? Quite frankly, they find it funny. There are always trolls. Quite frankly, I think this is about equal to when there was a thread on r/mensrights extolling (and encouraging) people to troll on the "I need feminism..." tumblr.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 04:00 AM
7

I'd say end the hypocrisy, either well all get cut or no one does As someone lucky enough not to be from the US, I'm glad my culture doesn't cut girls or boys. However, I think that most women are educated enough to understand the argument that male circumcision is bad for reasons "x,y,z..." and would oppose it, or at least sign a petition against it. However, the clergy will not. This is from my experience, back when the American Academy of Pediatrics was about to make an announcement on their …
/r/MensRights08/02/13 06:32 PM
10

Out of curiosity, what is the context of the ban? Is it non-child-friendly sites or a ban applicable to everyone? If it's for child-friendliness, I can see why sites with swear words would be blocked. I once turned on the "family" setting to see what would happen, and any page that used anything remotely controversial (e.g. the NYTimes, for war coverage at the time) would be blocked. Other than that, it does sound terribly like quote-mining. AVfM does make some good points, but as with any blog …
/r/MensRights08/02/13 06:24 PM
1

My impression, before seeing some more of this subreddit, was that men's rightists supported posting people's personal information with the intent of harassment and intimidation, since y'all link to Elam's site, the one of RegisterHer fame.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 06:15 PM
3

IIRC, there was even a post on this subreddit extolling someone here for trashing on the "I need feminism..." tumblr.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 06:12 PM
2

I hope this gains enough traction. And I wonder what Phyllis Schlafly will say/do about it.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 06:19 AM
3

Arkansas law will wait until after a conviction of rape, to protect people from being automatically punished upon a charge rather than a conviction. Sounds like they're defining rape as being convicted of rape in court.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 06:18 AM
1

Good to know. I'll make sure to finish up my paperwork before (if) I move to NY.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 09:20 PM
1

But tribal affiliation doesn't necessitate a name change. I'm Chinese, and women keep their birth names -- since meaning counts, the name might not make sense afterwards. As a scientist, name-changing after marriage sounds like a bureaucratic nightmare.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 07:00 AM
13

And no exceptions for the rich folk, hopefully.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 11:44 PM
3

Really? I thought it was the same for any name change -- driver's license, social security card, visas/passports, security permits, and something for the tax stuff.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 11:32 PM
3

It sounds like a lot of paperwork to change a name after marriage. I made a small change to my name two years ago, and I'm still not done.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 09:16 PM
3

In response to an askmen's question I posted, men's list seem to include financially successful, above-average beautiful (someone said 7+), intellectual, and makes kids/family a priority. I'm not sure what women want, but the responses on askmen must be from men much picker than me.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 08:00 PM
5

Slightly off topic, but wasn't there some debacle about /r/feminism and /r/feminisms not being feminist anymore? I thought a bunch of feminists created yet another subreddit. So if the feminists are gone, who is running /r/feminism?
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:53 PM
5

But Phyllis Schlafly is alive and still wealthy.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:52 PM
3

It does make me wonder, why is it the norm in western culture to change names upon marrying in the first place?
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:49 PM
1

To me its pretty fucking clear she fucked someone else raw, and wants an abortion to avoid the pregnancy. I didn't get that impression at all. It sounds like if she cheated, she could have also gotten an early first trimester abortion without telling. Also, considering the dependency of condoms and withdrawal on proper use, and the problems of patch-form drug delivery (existed in pain medicine, could extend to birth control), the failure rate of their contraception choices are pretty reasonable.…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 05:22 PM
1

I see it as less of a game than a failing of the justice and social services system. Truly, what recourse is there in the US for the people<sup>1</sup> who are victims, but judged not to be victims by the court? <sup>1</sup> The women/girls mentioned in the article, but especially also the men prevented from even coming forward with their stories by pre-existing bias.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 08:29 AM
12

It was described to me that there are experiences that I can never share. I have never experienced gender dysphoria, had to regret my parents decision to circumcise (glad they did not!), had a mental illness or disability, suffered from sexual abuse/assault, lived in extreme poverty, etc. There are experiences I can listen to others describe, sympathize -- but not ever successfully live vicariously through their stories of life. So when that NYTimes columnist wrote an article, essentially callin…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 08:24 AM
6

Yes, I read it. I see the observation from the study, that these girls believe their action is futile. The next steps you claim in the essay as necessary, I'm having trouble understanding the way you step to each one. The girls believe their action is futile because the social view says their intelligence is an "unchanging attribute." This sounds like the theory of the person's research, which may be true. Let's say it is. The reason these girls think their intelligence is an unchanging attribut…
/r/MensRights02/02/13 11:48 PM
1

Take the top three things Feminists are fighting for, the top three things Masculists are fighting for, and compare them. Actually, what are they nowadays?
/r/MensRights02/02/13 07:25 PM
8

Researchers have uncovered the reason for this difference in how difficulty is interpreted, and it is simply this: More often than not, Bright Girls believe that their abilities are innate and unchangeable, while bright boys believe that they can develop ability through effort and practice....We continue to carry these beliefs, often unconsciously, around with us throughout our lives. And because Bright Girls are particularly likely to see their abilities as innate and unchangeable, they grow up…
/r/MensRights02/02/13 07:12 PM
2

I thought (and still think) my teachers are pretty smart. Some of them were also lecturers at a nearby private university (ranked consistently in the top ten for engineering<sup>1.)</sup> We had a gifted program, and those teachers were superb. Guess I lucked out. <sup>1</sup> My schedule was heavily loaded with math/science courses, so I can't say much about the other subjects offered.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 06:06 PM
8

So my interpretation was: more women than men go to college, but there are higher prices than ever -- affects more women than men --> oppression of women. Insert something about Obama. What kind of nut comes up with this stuff? Am I going crazy?
/r/MensRights02/02/13 04:16 PM
6

I don't agree with pulling quotes out of concept and misrepresenting content. That quote was an argument attacking the religious argument that says having health insurance pay for birth control violates the employer's religious freedom. Here is some context: “If you take a step back and think about that, you work at a restaurant or you work at a store, and your boss is able to deny you leukemia coverage or contraception coverage or blood transfusions or any number of medical concerns that someon…
/r/MensRights02/02/13 07:38 AM
0

I understand. Asian male here = over-represented minority, if there can be such a thing.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 06:55 AM
2

Maybe I'm just a naive 20-something but I've never seen one medical campaign in my life time or work life that told me to go rub my testes for lumps or go to the doctor to have my prostate examined. Uh... I have... and do... I've been to events where they hand out fake testicles for us to practice on, and I've only a year on you. My layman opinion on the matter is that because we are so disposable, why does it matter if more of us die? Not really. Even my research into a disease that affects men…
/r/MensRights02/02/13 06:46 AM
9

Most women who attend our universities major in non-STEM (read bullshit) majors like English, Art, and Art History. I actually took several courses with women who said they were proud to be in "new media" programs. Basically, they're wasting the university's time and your money with their grants and subsidized loans. I'm not sure why non-STEM majors are automatically bullshit. A lot of the texts-based majors do the sort of research that actually makes them very good at the type of coding used in…
/r/MensRights02/02/13 06:29 AM
13

Nope. It took far too long to see what the designer was trying to communicate.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 06:18 AM
4

Since it was fairly recently determined that women present with different symptoms, raising awareness in emergency physician staff to recognize these symptoms<sup>1</sup> , make women more aware of their risk and these symptoms<sup>2</sup> (i.e. go to the hospital if you feel xyz), and lastly raise awareness among researchers to stop pursuing single-gender research models when the disease affects both men and women. <sup>1</sup> and not write them off as heartburn, nerves/stress, PMS, or hypocho…
/r/MensRights02/02/13 06:16 AM
2

A few years ago, I attended a medical conference with my research mentor. There was a session on increasing awareness and diagnosis of boys and young men with autoimmune diseases. Why? More women than men have autoimmune diseases. A girl/young woman presenting classical symptoms enters the doctor's office, and it's one of the first things screened for. It was less likely for the boy/young man, who might not have the classical symptoms, so it's more likely to be missed.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 06:04 AM
6

I think many people have problem with Bayesian statistics. It is more likely for men than women to have heart disease. Among the population of men with heart disease, more are diagnosed earlier. Among the population of women with heart disease, differences in symptom presentation mean later diagnosis or misdiagnosis is more frequent. Overall, more men than women die of heart disease, but that is because more men than women get heart disease.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 06:02 AM
1

Isn't she in Colorado? I thought pot became alright there. A teacher is always teaching to kids that look up to them. If this is how you would like you daughter to act this would be a good teacher for you. So countries with public nude beaches have no teachers who go nude in their free time?
/r/MensRights02/02/13 05:55 AM
11

Better: don't get knocked for interfering with free speech. Exercise freedom of speech with new posters.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 05:46 AM
1

The female condom is an interesting concept. However, it does not seem to be as ubiquitous or low-cost as the typical condom handed out for free by the student health center. Spermicides sound like they have a lot of strange side effects such as irritation, vaginal pH imbalance, etc. and very high failure rates for the trouble. The Pill was only recently made "free," and apparent interpreted by insurance carriers as providing one type of pill for free on the plan. There are also, for various rea…
/r/MensRights02/02/13 05:41 AM
5

I think TheFarnell said it very concisely here. There is a medical context to this campaign. Heart disease awareness, among lay people and physicians is lower for women than men. There are gendered differences in disease symptoms and response to treatment. Many of these differences were missed because it wasn't known until the 90s that there were these differences -- because of mostly men studied for clinical research and male animal models. There have been campaigns alerting men of their risk f…
/r/MensRights02/02/13 05:30 AM
9

I'm not sure how many people in your college are believing this stuff. This poster was poorly designed, and it's not very clear what the point of it is.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 05:26 AM
3

I know of several labs doing research on heart tissue, that are pulling only from Caucasian male cadavers and male animal models. This is good for keeping the subject population homogeneous and ruling out confounding variables, but this is also a good way to miss gendered nuances in disease presentation and response to treatment. I don't often see the research study modeling general health, that goes out of the way to recruit women subjects. Even my project does not, because it's much harder to …
/r/MensRights02/02/13 05:17 AM
2

Women have a lower diagnosis rate and are less responsive to treatment because there are gender differences in symptoms and response to treatment, which wasn't known until the 90s, and until then, research primarily focused on using men in clinical studies and male animal models. It wasn't intentional sexism -- male animals to prevent interference from the estrus cycle, (Caucasian) male clinical study participants to keep the subject population homogeneous. Even now, my research pulls from all C…
/r/MensRights02/02/13 05:11 AM
3

Thanks for providing the correct medical facts. I'm glad you beat me to it :) Really, all-male clinical research and animal model studies have limitations when the presentation of disease and response to therapy have gender differences.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 05:08 AM
8

My school was nicer then. I made a deal with my high school math/chemistry/physics teachers: if I get the right answer, I get the points. If I get the wrong answer, no partial credit. I showed whatever work felt necessary (i.e. little to none). If for whatever reason, the teacher suspected I was cheating, we'd have a little chat, I'd scrawl on the blackboard, it would be right, and life went on.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 04:49 AM
2

I also believe that if a man and woman goes into a sexual relationship both absolutely opposed to having a child, and the woman willfully becomes pregnant for whatever reason, that is bad for the man, and something should be done to address that. However, there are also two cases that legal parental surrender would make more complicated: Accidental pregnancies do happen. If the man and the woman are both morally opposed to abortion, the woman would be affected more severely. This is especially p…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 04:26 AM
2

Sounds like she's receiving praise primarily for being a college senior using her time and extreme-couponing skills for a charity. The charity she chose was a battered women's shelter. I'd bet that someone who donated to homes/education programs for abused male youth, men's homeless shelters, prostate cancer research, etc. would also receive praise for going out of their way to be charitable. Edit: Damnit, please don't brigade another subreddit. Why don't you give it to a cause that doesn't disc…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 04:03 AM
3

Actually, is there any good, unbiased news covering of the Toronto incident? I can't find any might just end up watching the footage myself. What did people do that was illegal? What is the legal context of free speech at UT?
/r/MensRights01/02/13 03:49 AM
1

Yes. The circumcision threads had a lot of downvotes for people who supported circumcision. The collagen-enhanced skin cream threads had a lot of people who got the science and facts wrong. Lastly, there have been a few threads I've seen when people have linked another subreddit's thread, which then turned into a dead forest of deleted comments, and then have a huge complain-fest about censorship on other subreddits. Perhaps, unless it directly mentions men's rights, it might be good form not to…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 03:47 AM
1

AHA has better things to do than respond to than the perception of sexism from the masses who didn't know that the lower rate of women's (and female animal models) inclusion in heart disease research means that women are more likely to be undiagnosed, and when diagnosed, offered treatment primarily tested on men, even though there is good scientific evidence that men and women present with different symptoms and respond to some therapies differently.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 03:35 AM
3

Thank you for posting actual information about the context of women's heart disease --instead of a knee-jerk emotional reaction to assumed sexism. As a hopeful future doctor, I definitely got a sinking feeling when the prof described a near-miss case, that the doctor had caught because he had recently attended a conference describing women's heart attack symptoms. Who knows what therapies that might have worked better on women than men that were nixed, or what other diseases that have less data …
/r/MensRights01/02/13 03:32 AM
4

Heart disease affects both men and women, but the historically male-oriented research into detection and treatment of heart disease results in misdiagnosis and undertreatment for women. For example, men and women having heart attacks have some symptoms in common, but a significant population of women present with different symptoms, resulting in delayed treatment for these women. Part of the problem is that for many years, to keep medical research subjects as homogeneous as possible, the subject…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 03:26 AM
1

Yes. The man was not able to give consent.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 02:51 AM
3

Well, there's: y'all, peeps, humans
/r/MensRights29/01/13 03:09 PM
1

I think people have now set up a donation for members of Henrietta Lack's family. She was so poor, she was buried in an unmarked plot -- Hopkins donated a headstone. That's an interesting problem though, because to the best of my knowledge, gov't regulations require tissue samples to be stripped of identifying information.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:25 PM
1

Not SkinMedica, and they don't have to. That's the joy about having a good cell line: Advanced BioHealing and SkinMedica’s cells lines are both derived from a single foreskin. Someone else did the investigative journalism but the cell lines in my lab (not from foreskin) are doing well.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:56 PM
1

My friends got into this argument one evening, so I posted it on askmen. We looked over these again today. Men can be ridiculously picky too. Career woman + above average (7-ish) + great personality + time for a family. I remember our health teacher making us list desirable in partners in 8th grade. The lists were all insanely long, but the boys' were almost all based on looks. Even as a guy, I thought it was pretty shallow.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 08:39 AM
2

What? These are kids from very low-income families, who suddenly don't qualify for financial aid because their dads were assholes who won't release any financial info, so that the kid can get the paperwork in order. There were bright kids who got accepted into ivy league universities from inner city schools who lost their scholarships. They couldn't even get financial aid at the state school. These are kids who 1) can't get a loan, because they'd need an adult with good credit to cosign and 2) w…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 08:29 AM
1

It was explained to me that custody should go to the parent who spends most of the time raising the kid, because this parent has the most experience so far with the kid, and it's better to keep the home environment stable for the kid. So, really, it's for the kids sake that custody goes to the stay-at-home mother if the father barely spends time with his family. I like the idea of the courts looking out for the children's best interests, since they had no fault in the divorce.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 08:21 AM
3

My girl friends (strictly platonic!) were often bothered by this behavior, and I'd have to walk around with them, even in the mall. I mean, I'd turn around to look at something interesting, we'd get separated, and a guy would start hassling her. This happened all the time. Maybe you didn't notice because the idiots don't do this to men, only women?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 08:16 AM
5

That's shitty for the dad, but also really shitty for the kid who now can't afford to go to college.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 08:12 AM
3

I'm on the phone with my mom on my way to yoga when a guy leans out of a doorway, drags on his cigarette and gestures with his pelvis how much he is enjoying my yoga pants. I'm walking home from the grocery store and a middle-aged guy, maybe high, maybe drunk, yells at me, "Get back here, girl!" I’m waiting for the bus when a carful of bros whips by; one leans out the passenger window, points at the girls waiting at the bus stop and yells, "Yes, Yes, No...Yes!" After work, I'm walking from the t…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 07:55 AM
2

However, shouldn't he have the right to sign an agreement with her saying he didn't want offspring, and if she wanted to keep the baby, she would assume all financial responsibility (even though that would likely not stand a chance in court)? I've also been thinking about this, because the teen pregnancy rate was something miserably high back home. In the hallways, I would frequently hear the guys talking to their girls, about how they would always take care of their "baby mamas." But when the g…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:57 AM
3

Now let's talk about the draft. Can the US please get rid of the selective service? As a Canadian, it means I'll not end up living here.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:47 AM
2

It's quite bad. Apparently, in the state where I live, it was illegal for a man and woman who were not married to cohabit together, and it was illegal for more than four women to live together without a man in the same house (which is why we have no sororities). Anyways, these laws stayed laws until they were unearthed some time ago to add extra charges.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:45 AM
2

There are some weird old laws on the books. My high school newspaper used to include a selection in the funnies section. It is illegal top wear a dake [?] moustache that causes laughter in church. (Alabama) While it is legal to shoot bears, waking sleeping bear for the purpose of taking a photograph is prohibited. (Alaska) In Tucson, it is illegal for women to wear pants. In Glendale, it is illegal to drive a car in reverse. (Arizona) A man can legally beat his wife, but not more than once a mon…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:43 AM
-2

I don't know for sure, and I'm not sure googling it shows that you're an expert. This is anecdotal, but at my high school, where single motherhood was fairly common, a lot of students had deadbeat fathers. It was really sad when many of the smart kids couldn't get financial aid for college because the fathers willfully withheld their financial information, as some sort of retribution against the mothers.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:38 AM
2

I've been a lurker for a long time, and I once stumbled across this article trying to describe constantly being hit on from a man's point of view. I think it was the constant onslaught of interruptions and peoplee demanding this guy's attention that really drove home the point for me. The next day, another girl: “Hey, can I buy you a coffee?” This time, I was trying to work out a difficult programming solution in my mind, and she asked me at exactly the right moment to have all of my thoughts co…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:34 AM
8

Please see my comment. There are no actual foreskins in the skin cream.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:23 AM
16

There was another thread in men's rights discussing this. Here is some context: 10 years ago, one infant foreskin was donated for research. Cell lines from that tissue is currently used in various skin-related projects, such as treating burn victims. Someone found out that that particular cells can produce compounds apparently useful in facial cream and commercialized a cream using those compounds. Oprah has endorsed that brand of cream. Now then, I am for the prohibition of infant circumcision …
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:22 AM
2

I think the point is that the average man dressing like a woman gets much more trouble than the average woman dressing like a man in the streets. You might be a gentleman and a scholar, but it doesn't mean everyone around you follows the standards of being a decent human being.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:11 AM
2

So, would it be your opinion, that only heterosexual men are men, while it's degrading for a man to be anything else?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:06 AM
1

Well, apologies for not knowing that beforehand. Apparently there were infants circumcised without pain management, and there was a paper to test the efficacy of one analgesic. As I mentioned, I'm not circumcised, and my culture doesn't believe in circumcision. I did ask my American friends, and they said they remembered nothing. Thank you for the correction. And I'm not sure how you interpreted my post as being for circumcision. It was only my opinion that the path to gaining support of prohibi…
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:55 PM
4

The use of HeLa cells in research is sometimes an ethical issue because they were derived from patient tissue taken without consent and used for research without with<sup>1</sup> neither her consent nor her family's consent at the time. Her family didn't find out about any of this until it was published (it would now be a breach of patient privacy) in popular magazines. The derivation of both the HeLa cell line and the cell lines from the 10 year old foreskin are potentially unethical. Yet, is s…
/r/MensRights27/01/13 06:50 PM
10

Edit to add: I'm glad you also actually read this miserable excuse for journalism. It has byproducts from stem cells from cell lines from one foreskin donated who knows how long 10 years ago, probably with parental permission and requisite legal paperwork. “Our TNS formula was bio-engineered from a single tissue donation collected over 10 years ago for wound healing research.” If any byproduct from that donation is problematic, then we should also stop all research worldwide on HeLa cells and di…
/r/MensRights27/01/13 06:24 PM
4

Well, they did used to remove tonsils and adenoids pre-emptively, if you can trust (and stomach) this recollection from Roald Dahl.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 04:39 PM
9

At least from my observation, from a culture that does not circumcise, it's bundled with religious freedom or something like that in the US. It's somehow involved for the Christians and the Jewish, both groups which have a major say in US policy. I go to a university with strong pro-religious undertones (even though it's supposedly a secular university), and so circumcision is sort of an avoided topic. A group on my campus tried to support an American Peds resolution against infant male circumci…
/r/MensRights27/01/13 04:33 PM
2

Yes. When I used to read about murderers, it seemed common that when a kid disappears, parent(s) or guardian(s) are harassed as potentially being the fault of the disappearance, whether they're at fault or not.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 06:32 AM
2

I've always wondered about the fitness standard. How physical must military work be? A lot of the ROTC students go on do work like radio, signal processing, etc. In fact, two alums said they never even saw war -- they were stationed in nuclear medicine and something secret about detecting something chemical, and got to go to Europe. Would it be possible to lower the standards for everyone? They also complained lots about the run of the mill soldier being like an "over-arrogant high schooler," wh…
/r/MensRights27/01/13 04:28 AM
2

More importantly, where are the unions who fight for worker safety?
/r/MensRights27/01/13 04:02 AM
6

Now that you've realized she isn't what you thought, maybe take down her contact information and tack on an edit to your post? That site has you listed a few times, this profile was last updated in 1995. I doubt that directory site existed in 1995, but it lists the same address and description. [Edit to add rest of quote] According to Alexa that directory site is 9 years old and builds it's own profiles based on gathered information or has user created profiles. It's possible this is just a case…
/r/MensRights27/01/13 03:50 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter