TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

lacrimosoPraeteritus Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by lacrimosoPraeteritus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm talking about what I saw. The classic way of claiming your "lived experiences" as evidence. Edit: Gonna write this here so I don't forget. In another interview with multiple people, a woman accused Peterson of talking about femininity as though it was bad. Peterson was commenting on how feminizing men causes issues. I bet the woman would call forcing a trans person to live by the sex they're born as abuse.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/18 05:13 PM
3

1/3 x3 + C
/r/PussyPassDenied15/02/18 05:20 AM
1

The idea that you cannot at all question the victim is ridiculous. One thing that bothers me with recent sexual assault cases is that people like to call alleged victims, victims. Assuming that the people are victims and that a crime occurred in order to frame any objection/question a person might have as rape apologia.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 04:10 PM
2

Pierce Harlan is being a bit emotional. This is outrageous to me too, but the emotion shouldn't be directed at you. She says that people should be believed until there is evidence not to. What's the alternative? Assume the accuser is lying until enough evidence comes to life? No, the alternative is to withhold judgment. Withholding judgement falls under the category of "not believing the accusers claim." Not believing something is true does not mean you believe that it is false. However, if you …
/r/MensRights09/06/16 07:46 PM
2

If only ignorance and incredulity could prove things wrong. Link Link Liiiinnnk
/r/MensRights22/01/16 10:31 PM
1

Philosophy is always lumped in with all the worthless degrees, but I'm not too sure that's true. I haven't really looked into, but I have run across several articles claiming that Philosophy majors actually do pretty well for themselves with an average annual income of around ~65k iirc.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 04:40 AM
2

I vaguely recall reading a story online (veracity uncertain) about a black man who went around befriending kkk/racist groups. Supposedly he actually changed a lot of minds and got groups to disband.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 03:54 AM
1

She's like a hard 110 at best.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 03:01 AM
-2

Hah.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 06:36 AM
-1

Huh?
/r/MensRights16/12/15 06:17 AM
-4

Do you really think this is "harmless?" Nooo, I just said that for shits and giggles - yes I do. It's harmless. If so I have an upcoming book called throw stones at girls. Yeah, that'd be harmless too. Although it'd be unsuccessful because children wouldn't relate to the material. Also if people were to object to that book, I'd think they're being just as dumb as you're being right now.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 06:00 AM
-6

OOOooooOOooo Downvotes! How scary! Who cares? This one really isn't an issue guys. Harmless child fun. This really does make the sub look whiny.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 05:09 AM
1

For what it's worth, I agree with you. I've never agreed with the way people call every statement involving race racist. I think adopting sjw-ish thinking and terminology is a poor way to go. By all means point out the hypocrisy that they'd consider a similar statement about a different race as racist, but don't adopt their muddled thinking.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:06 AM
2

considered
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:00 AM
1

To me To him it's not.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 09:59 AM
3

Damn that poster came off as immature. They couldn't stop themselves from framing everything in terms of their goals. Reminds me of a younger friend of mine who wants to be rich. They look at everyone decision everyone else makes that didn't result in them moving towards making more money as a waste of time. "That's cool that they traveled, but it was a waste of time. What do they have to show for it?" It wasn't their goal to make money, there are more things to life than money, just like there …
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:53 AM
1

I didn't think she was anybody special. My surprise was because of that fact. I like that she's in it though simply because of how popular that incident is. That said, I'd wouldn't like it if they focused a large segment of the doc on her.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 03:45 PM
43

Wow, this looks really interesting. They even got big red in there. I like the filmmakers commentary of her uncertainty too. For anyone wondering, this doc seems to be about mens rights advocates and not about red piller stuff. The title seems to be using that phrase in the general "uncovering the uncomfortable truth" sense.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 02:22 AM
1

I absolutely disagree that if something is illegal then it is necessarily wrong.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 02:44 PM
5

I too am going to make an effort to not direct these words at women. I won't. I rarely use these kinds of words at people anyways though. There's nothing wrong with gender specific words it's a normal part of language.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 09:22 PM
16

Women are just as capable as learning as males. He never said they weren't.... You're projecting hard there buddy.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 02:34 PM
1

Your examples do not sound like oppression to me. Ah, I think I figured out why im hung up on not calling it oppression. Most times I've heard about oppression throughout my life it's been closely related to particularly awful tyrannies/dictatorships. Whereas I see gender issues as social/cultural/religious issues. I guess some of the issues are technically oppression, but I think the word oppression just doesn't fit in this context. Don't get me wrong though. I'm not saying that the things that…
/r/MensRights23/04/15 02:17 AM
1

The context of the discussion is about oppression due to gender. I'm using gender here to refer to sex. (male/female) It seems to me some people are saying that people haven't been oppressed due to their gender. Depending on what they define as oppression, I might agree with them.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 08:10 PM
1

"Women were never oppressed either." Chocoboat you do seem to be unintentionally misreading what people are writing.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 12:18 PM
1

Oh alright, I did think you were taking about Rp. Haha, shortly after or exchange I saw a post on RP titled something like "Redpill is not just another PUA subreddit" which was amusing. I haven't looked too much into the PUA, but I probably agree with you on them.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 11:15 AM
3

I'd have to disagree with you then. I didn't say they were trying to trick women, but that they are manipulating them. I understand learning to become sociable and gaining some self esteem; however, the RP not only advocates an inaccurate worldview, but it often exemplifies sociopathic/narcissistic type behavior. If you're intrigued by the sub check it out for awhile. I think you will end up seeing that stuff and negative views on women regularly.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 04:33 AM
1

I'd have to agree with you. I've looked around that sub the past couple of weeks and my impression of them is that they are self-centered and immature. Focusing way too much on one aspect of life, seemingly claiming they understand all of life because they're rose colored view of people was shattered. Its never been easy for me to disseminate Bargain Brand WorldviewsTM but I'm gonna bring up some things about RP that's been bugging me. RPers have had the curtains lifted and they see the way thin…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 01:13 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter