| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | A female employee can have consensual sex with their boss 40 or 50 times, but that sex can still be considered "unwelcome" and thus unlawful harassment.And its worse for men because they can't so easily claim to be sexually harassed, ppl are very reluctant to believe a man is being sexually harassed by a woman. Then if its an attractive woman ppl would say things to a man they wouldn't say to a woman like telling them they should have had sex with her and attempting to make the male victim feel like 'less of a man' because he didn't jump to the opportunity to have sex with his attractive boss. Much like the differences if a teacher is a male or… | /r/MensRights | 17/10/17 03:56 AM |
| 3 | That “male privilege” thoughI don't understand how what the man did is considered a sex crime because it was stated it was consensual sex. If anything it could maybe be some kind of simple assault and it should be taken into account it was a moment of passion. But if it was so bothersome why did she not stop having sex? I didn't read anything more than her asking him to stop touching her boobs and if she did ask him to stop(sex) then obviously he must have as she isn't accusing him of rape or anything so that would be clea… | /r/MensRights | 13/10/17 11:43 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter