TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ladut Archive

View 0 posts and 62 comments by ladut on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm not a social scientist, but it really depends. Some questions don't actually require controls, and in others it would be impossible or unethical to implement; but for what they were trying to accomplish, controls were absolutely required and they would've been easy to implement.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 03:37 PM
1

This might be the same one you're thinking of - they first simply tried to publish borderline nonsense into the top journals, but IIRC 6 out of 6 got rejected. So they got clever and started trying to publish somewhat more nuanced, kinda-sorta plausible stuff and that's when things started getting accepted. I actually looked at all the journals they published in, and none (at a glance) appeared to be predatory publications (like the example you're thinking of).
/r/MensRights31/03/19 03:35 PM
5

It's currently a big topic of discussion among the scientific community, and is a continuation of similar discussions that have been going on for years. It is worth noting though that the methodology used for this project was not particularly sound. Given that there are no controls, it's a subject of debate as to whether or not this is a problem limited to grievance studies or a science-wide problem. It's also worth noting that they are not the first group to stage a hoax like this to make a poi…
/r/MensRights30/03/19 05:10 PM
9

It has since been retracted by the journal. If you're looking for an interesting take on the subject, check out /r/science 's thread on what they did. A lot less "yeah, gotem!" and a lot more about whether what they did was scientifically valid or will ultimately make a difference.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 05:03 PM
6

If someone wants to start a riot, for example, and all they do is whip a crowd into a frenzy but don't actually participate in the violence, are they just off the hook? They were literally the catalyst that turned the crowd into a mob, but somehow because they didn't do the bad thing themselves they're in the clear? Manipulation is a powerful tool, and people in power are especially good at utilizing it to do shady shit while technically keeping their hands clean. Sure, it might be difficult to …
/r/MensRights22/03/19 11:01 PM
3

Totaling a car costs your insurance company more than multiple fender benders. I don't know if what the above poster said is true, but assuming it is, it makes sense from a purely fiscal point of view.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 10:12 PM
12

I don't know that that assumption is necessarily correct, but I don't know for sure. Assuming that's true though, stabbing wounds are still more likely to hemorrhage more severely than gunshot wounds on average. That's what I learned as an Army Medic anyway.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 05:24 PM
2

Look man, maybe I am being more of an asshole than I need to be, but while you may not often have to think about issues in India, I think about them a lot; and I hear people every day spouting some blatantly absurd and ignorant shit. I get that you were just repeating what you took to be truthful from somewhere else, so sorry for being a dick about that. The situation in India isn't as cut and dry as that. For starters, there isn't this pervasive "assertive, self-reliant cowboy" attitude like we…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 04:01 AM
1

I wrote about how the government should get more involved and the police should be more active, other things... Totally, but none of those things will result in immediate improvements. They take some time to become effective, and in the mean time, short-term, inexpensive things can be done to help women get through their day in peace. ...but you ignore that... Nah dawg, remember when I said in the first comment I made that, "I'm not saying they shouldn't keep working on it?" That was me acknowle…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 03:28 AM
1

So it was in an entirely different thread with different people commenting and you made the statement: "We've already established that it's guys with knives threatening women that's the problem in India." I think it's pretty fair to criticize that statement, my dude. Not only was it not a part of the conversation we were having, but even in that thread it was not "established" that that was the problem. Even with context, the shit you said was objectively, factually wrong.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:52 AM
-1

Ohh, I see what you're saying now. These women in India can just turn around and confront the guy. Call the police and Bam no more groping pervs. Well shit, problem solved my dude, I'll tell my wife to tell all her friends. You may have just singlehandedly saved all the women of India. Do you really thing that hasn't been tried? For starters, it's often impossible to even know who grabbed you in a crowded bus, and contrary to what you seem to believe, women aren't falsely accusing random strange…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:38 AM
0

We've already established that it's guys with knives threatening women that's the problem in India. No, no we haven't. I just looked at the context for this entire thread chain and nowhere does anyone other than you talk about dudes with knives. The idea that this is the primary method of sexual assault for dudes in India is frankly so goddamn stupid that it almost isn't worth responding to. But I will anyway: See, my wife is Indian, she spent the first 20-something years of her life in India, a…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:09 AM
-1

There is a lot they can do, but very few of them can result in near-immediate improvement in the lives of the women riding the bus, and it costs basically nothing to do. I'm not spreading lies, what I put up there is called an opinion, and given that my wife is Indian, and many in our friend circle are Indian women, I'd argue that mine is probably better informed than yours. Also, this has literally nothing to do with Western women. It's about a city in India, and if you try to look at Eastern c…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 01:48 AM
-2

Honestly, governments in general usually do not or cannot accurately account for crimes that are self-reported. Remember, men in the US are frequently sexually assaulted, but only very recently have these reporting agencies shown just how common it is. We saw reports in the media before our government recognized it as a problem.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 07:52 PM
0

That's not the topic of conversation though. If anything, since we can't determine whether a groping is intentional or not and persecute those who are guilty, it makes segregation in public transportation a more attractive proposition in India.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 07:47 PM
-1

That's much easier said than done, and there's very little an individual or city can do in the short term to change a problem that has developed over centuries. I'm not saying they shouldn't keep working on it, but in the mean time, this helps women who are groped daily in public transportation from having to deal with that bullshit for at least part of their commute.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 07:42 PM
4

This isn't in the west though, it's in Bangalore. And yes, in many places in the developing world there are men that straight up are of the opinion that it isn't that big a deal.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 07:38 PM
61

This is a meta-analysis, meaning it pooled and analyzed data from many different primary sources, 111 for this particular analysis. Due to the nature of the topic being studied, many of the primary sources would likely be self-reported, either by the victims or perpetrators.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 11:09 PM
-1

The problem is, this little venting area here can be seen by literally everyone, and anyone even remotely critical of the movement can have a field day with shitty things said and phrases taken out of context. Whether we like it or not, stuff like this does make the movement look bad.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 04:45 PM
0

Honestly, not really. Both are despicable, and both are terrifying if they might ever apply to you.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 02:32 AM
1

Define dirty. Do you mean number of bacteria, or probability of an infectious dose being present on a surface? Because if it's the former, then yes your phone is covered in bacteria, that's common knowledge, but most are non-pathogenic. In a bathroom that was recently visited by a sick person, the toilet may still have fewer microbes per square inch overall, but the probability of being exposed to an infectious dose of some fecal microbes are very high.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 06:11 PM
1

I think I do, actually, having a background in medical microbiology. For most E. coli strains, 10<sup>6</sup> or 10<sup>7</sup> is the ID<sup>50,</sup> true, but for O157H7 it's estimated that only 10<sup>3</sup> or so is required for infection, same with some salmonella strains if not less. Furthermore, you can become I'll from far less than rolling in shit. 10<sup>6</sup> isn't really that much when we're talking about bacteria. A single seemingly clean tomato can contain that much on it's sur…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 06:04 PM
-1

Disease transmission is a numbers game as often as it's a presence/absence thing. For some diseases like the norovirus, 5% is more than enough to cause illness, so it doesn't matter either way. Salmonella, E. coli, and countless others do have thresholds that could reasonably be avoided by lowering the lid.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 06:20 AM
1

No, there weren't that many to begin with. That thread was overwhelmingly positive and supportive.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 03:15 PM
32

Why is she a slut for sharing a nude with her boyfriend? It was the authorities that charged him, not her pressing charges. For fucks sake, you can advocate for men's rights without acting like the "mysogynistic male" stereotype that causes this movement so much grief. She shouldn't be charged for something that a consenting adult could do legally and neither should he.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 06:40 PM
-3

Army-wide the physical standards for women are lower than men due to anatomical differences (for example, the push up standards are lower due to less developed upper body muscles, but the sit up standards are the same). It wasn't really a surprise to anyone who knows this that their run times were longer. It wasn't special treatment any more than it's ever been in the military.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 07:54 PM
2

I've met some pretty badass Indian aunties in my day, my mother in law among them. All the actual blatant sexism and real tangible rape culture (if you want to call it that), and many still manage to do incredible things.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 07:47 PM
1

I'd like to see the cost/benefit analysis you did to determine that. And honestly, if you view it that way, there's very few things in life that you're not at risk of being screwed over for doing. Any time you interact with a child you're at risk of being accused a pedophile. Every time you interact with a woman you're at risk of being called a rapist or pervert. Better avoid those at all costs. We're talking about saving a fucking life. The benefit, while not received by you, is much bigger tha…
/r/MensRights22/12/16 03:03 PM
1

Fortunately in the years since the lawsuit I referenced, new research strongly suggests that the old assumption "moving a suspected back injury will cripple them for life" is not true in the vast majority of cases. In fact, something like less than 2% of actual spinal cord injuries are worsened by reasonable amounts of movement in a rescue situation. On top of that, only a small percentage of suspected spinal cord injuries turn out to be actual injuries. So you're looking at maybe a 1 in 200 cha…
/r/MensRights22/12/16 05:08 AM
4

It's a sign of the times we now live in. You're fooling yourself if you think that it hasn't always been that way. If anything, it's been much better than it has in the last 100 years. Racial tensions have recently flared up, but nothing like even 30 years ago, political tensions are high here, but not dangerously so (yet anyway), crime is on a consistent decline... Gender tensions are higher than they've been since maybe suffrage, but it's still a minority of women who are radical feminists.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 04:18 AM
2

You could be sued for pulling someone out of a car that was on fire Just a point of contention here, most states have good samaritan laws that protect you in cases like this. California recently ruled that their good samaritan law extends only to "medical care" (The Cali Supreme Court shit the fucking bed so goddamn bad on that ruling it's ridiculous, but that's besides the point), but so long as what you do is "reasonable" for the situation then you're probably alright. I say all this because t…
/r/MensRights22/12/16 04:15 AM
1

Marijuana was never mentioned in this comment or the comment he replied to. Also I'm fairly certain he wasn't literally saying it was like smoking meth. It's fairly obvious they were talking about how serious it's taken by society.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 01:55 PM
2

FWIW there's still a big difference in reasoning ability between a 17 year old and a 30 year old. Hell, there's a noticeable difference between a 14 and 17 year old's reasoning ability. You can argue that there isn't or that it's minimal, but you'd be patently wrong. Ask literally any developmental psychologist. I agree with many of your sentiments, but you're oversimplifying a lot of things and making some easily disproved statements (such as this one, or your insistence that a power dynamic do…
/r/MensRights04/06/16 01:51 PM
5

I don't know what you're implying here. Are you saying that MRAs are by definition also anti-immigration? If so, that makes no damn sense to me, as the two philosophies are in no way related.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 06:45 PM
1

The US military, at least at the higher levels, has been making good strides in this direction. Unfortunately at the unit level, it's a big mixed bag. Unit leaders (not exclusively, but in my experience it's usually the NCOs) often still hold to their outdated or biased opinions, and it is sometimes difficult for even women to get the help they need. A male victim of rape is often looked down on and considered weak or whatever by both his peers and leadership. Still a ways to go before the avera…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:26 PM
1

I was never in the Navy, but the Army? Yes. I'm pretty sure the EO programs between the two are very similar if not the same, so I've probably seen/experienced most of that crap. I will say though that in my 7 years, I never saw a sexual harassment/assault investigation that appeared to be false. If anything, I hear about people being sexually assaulted far more often than I see it being reported. I've also never seen a female pass or get signed off for something she didn't earn in my unit (thou…
/r/MensRights12/10/15 12:28 PM
7

I'm gonna be honest, I didn't get that at all. I think it's to encourage reenlistment among females because they are in the minority and the Navy wants to equal out the ranks. I don't see an issue in that at all. The more I look at it, the more confused I become as to why you're offended, and why this belongs here at all. There are plenty of legitimate things to take issue with, legitimate examples of inequality or sexism; so I don't know why you'd choose to make a point about this. Doing so onl…
/r/MensRights11/10/15 12:46 AM
13

Regardless of the down votes I'm about to receive, I have to agree with you. As much as I want to support men's issues advocacy, I find a sizeable number of men who seem to fall into the same trap radical feminists do: a hyper simplistic us vs them worldview that further polarizes the issues.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 10:20 PM
1

Focusing on a particular issue or the concerns of a group of people does not imply that other related issues are not relevant/important. It's folly to expect someone who has an interest in a particular subject to become equally as active in all related subjects for fear of belittling another. If I'm interested in testicular cancer research because it has personally affected me, it would be pretty fucked up for someone to say, "Well other cancers exist too. By focusing on testicular cancer, you'r…
/r/MensRights26/12/14 06:14 PM
0

exactly why FEMINISM doesn't need to exist, just like MANISM doesn't need to exist. Sorry, I've been following this convo, and I had to pipe in here. I don't quite follow the logic, how does the fact that, "both genders face their own issues," somehow negate the usefulness of advocacy groups? Because that's what feminism boils down to when you remove the extremists and the bullshit statistics. Sexism still exists (I'm in the Army, and oh god is it still an issue), even if you believe men's issue…
/r/MensRights26/12/14 08:10 AM
7

And the act of someone grabbing your balls is not sexual assault?
/r/MensRights29/11/14 06:56 PM
16

One example is not evidence that this is common or easy. This was such an extreme example it's almost difficult to believe it is real. Is it proof in concept? Yes, but it's a huge logical leap to apply this to women in general.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 06:17 PM
13

That's OPs point: the average person should be treated as an innocent. Why not strive for that in stead of dragging everyone else down?
/r/MensRights26/02/14 10:33 PM
6

99% of breast cancer victims are women, therefore it's acceptable to make the assumption that a given woman has breast cancer. That's a fallacious argument.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 04:14 AM
0

You should read the reply I made to /u/supersaddy, as it addresses socioeconomic status somewhat. Context is important here, amongst people of the same SES, race and gender play a significant role. Perhaps the role of race and gender are incorrectly overemphasized in comparison to SES in parts of society, but it would also be fallacy to underestimate their impact.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 04:34 AM
0

I would agree, majority privilege is probably more appropriate, but in the US whites are the majority, and males do make up the majority of politicians, business owners, and other positions of power. Whether we call our privilege "white," or "male," or "majority," is irrelevant; the fact of the matter is that it exists, and it's consequences are the same regardless of name.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 01:41 AM
1

The unidirectional definition of racism you put forth has some problems. Due to the heterogeneity of the US and the world (if you're not from the US then I apologize, but my criticisms apply elsewhere), power isn't always unidirectional, and isn't equally concentrated among all areas. Furthermore, other stratifying forces (chiefly socioeconomic status) can have a much greater influence on power structure than race or gender in certain areas. First of all, power does not originate from any single…
/r/MensRights24/12/13 10:08 PM
-2

I don't think that's what he's saying. Think of it like this: say you're fortunate enough to be born into some wealth - you will, for your entire life (probably), have opportunities that many others will not. Is it your fault? No. Should you feel guilty? No, but you should acknowledge that you got the lucky draw in an unequal system, and understand that others are suffering for want of what you have. You don't need to give it away, you don't need to apologize, but be humbled that you got lucky. …
/r/MensRights24/12/13 09:33 PM
0

I agree that threats and harassment should be taken more seriously than some off-hand insult, however I think that the social/historical context of offense against certain groups should be considered before dismissing an insult as being equal to any other. Some insults like "ginger," or "fat ass," might be harmful and offensive, but the discrimination faced by the insultees are generally of a non-violent nature; and the people insulting are typically less invested in their belief than the next e…
/r/MensRights24/12/13 09:07 PM
1

You're creating a false dilemma: MRM vs Feminism, which is exactly what I hate about radical feminists. It is possible to be aware of inequalities faced by both sexes and advocate for the correction of such issues, and it is also possible to be critical of a movement without being against it. I have feminist friends, friends that I sometimes disagree with, but also highly respect. Your attitude is childish and counterintuitive to what the MRM is trying to do.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 02:23 AM
5

Backwards baseball cap dude was pretty weird looking, and the girl in the first picture wasn't the beacon of stereotypical beauty either. I'd have to disagree with your assessment, for these ads at least.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:42 AM
4

This sub is full of sexist men who think everything is an attack on their very small ego as a man. Unfortunately, both the MR and feminist movements have a disproportionately large number of these types of people I've come to find. Objectively, both parties have important issues that they advocate for, but it get's clouded by ad hominem arguments and hypersensitivity to criticism.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:40 AM
1

These ads were divided roughly half and half between men and women. The sample size is simply too small to conclude that it was advocating for white knighting. I think this type of advertising could be effective, though there are obviously huge flaws that need to be addressed.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:35 AM
0

I appear to be a minority, but I kind of like these ads. They obviously can be improved upon (chiefly by addressing the fact that they only concern male on female rape), but they suggest that rape prevention is and should be a cultural movement rather than just blaming the rapist. Before anyone downvotes me for that last statement, let me explain: Though a rapist's actions are solely the decision of the rapist, there are often times things that potential victims and bystanders can do to prevent …
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:32 AM
1

The training is improving, but the bulk of my unit are still pitiful.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 02:58 AM
1

I suppose that makes you more fortunate than I, though before the military, I had never known anything like it. Rape jokes are made to be "socially acceptable" ways to beat your chest I've found in the military; and it's so bad in my unit in particular that you're almost alienated if you don't laugh and joke along. Hell, just after the last sexual assault prevention training thing I went out to lunch with a few guys, and one of the more senior NCOs actually asked (more told) the waitress if she …
/r/MensRights10/06/13 02:57 AM
1

Fair enough, and in many/most cases it is.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 02:50 AM
1

You are working under the assumption that the "culture we live in" is homogenous. The military might be defined as a "closed community," but it's a community millions of people in size, and one that also spends a good chunk of it's time intermingled among society at large (they are not really a closed community). The sum total of United States culture may not condone victim shaming or rapist apologism (new word I just invented), but the US is historically very dynamic and varied, and it would be…
/r/MensRights10/06/13 02:48 AM
1

It depends on who you're around. I am constantly disgusted by the attitudes about rape, sex, and gender roles in society that are held by people in the military (at least the small sphere I've been exposed to), as well as the attitudes held by more college students than I would like to believe (and I study at a liberal arts college in one of the more liberal cities in the Midwest). As to it's prevalence country/worldwide I cannot speak, but it certainly isn't absent.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 02:34 AM
2

You lose important details and distinctions when you try to condense social issues. MRM folks should know this all too intimately, being at the receiving end of oversimplifications about what rape is and who can commit it. I have to agree with /u/Slyfox00 on this one, your summary is kind of reactionary: your conclusion was made 30 seconds into the video, and you saw what you wanted to see.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 02:30 AM
2

I quite literally received training on Sexual harassment/assault prevention and reporting procedures earlier today, and saw it for the first time through the lens of the MSM movement. While the booklet may, in fact, contain this typo (I did not read it), the training has been updated to emphasize that both men and women can be victim and assailant. They spent a great deal trying to dispel the notion that sexual assault was a unidirectional thing, and I was impressed at how forward-thinking the m…
/r/MensRights10/06/13 02:26 AM
5

I'm torn: As an advocate for Men's rights, I like this. As an advocate of gay rights and a firm believer that two men or two women can raise a child just as well as a heterosexual couple, however, I cannot agree with the sentiment that a father figure is uniquely important to the development of a young man.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 12:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter