TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

lala_xyyz Archive

View 0 posts and 633 comments by lala_xyyz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I didn't say women changed, the environment changed which enabled the current behavior. And not that enabled behavior is being fed back into the gene pool using these policies. And that environment change is entirely the men's fault (not ours, bot our father, grandfathers and grand-grandfathers). Sure, the marriage 1.0 wasn't all rainbow and sunshine - but it enabled MOST of the men to mate with a SINGLE woman, and it sustained the CIVILIZATION. Now that contract is broken. Most men are no longe…
/r/TheRedPill22/05/23 11:57 AM
21

"We" didn't fuck up, the generation of men that gave women voting rights, the pill, no-fault divorce and all these privileges did. They did for the promise of a pussy. "If women had sexual freedom, every man would have sex all the time". Well guess how that went. Now, we are just reaping consequences of actions whose trajectory was set a century ago.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/23 07:24 PM
1

8,000 YEARS AGO, 17 WOMEN REPRODUCED FOR EVERY ONE MAN. And for almost 2 million years before that it was roughly one for one, and many thousands of year after that. This one-off bottleneck was due to technological breakthrough (in this case - agriculture which ensured food security and centralization of power in cities) are not representative of general tenedency. Someone could also take a look at European countries in the 20th century where that ratio was similarly skewed due to many wars and …
/r/TheRedPill30/10/22 05:24 PM
2

60% (majority) of male genes were deemed unworthy of replication by women. No, this is not what happened. It was not sexual selection by women that caused only half of men to reproduce. It was higher death rates of men before they could have offspring, due to war, competition among men (including revenge and blood feuds), and working in risky professions. Sexually, homo sapiens has been egalitarian ever since the species existed, and many species before that.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/22 05:12 PM
3

Azov is running white supremacy camps for youth while at the same time waging war with the closest ethnic group they have (with the most blonde/blue-eyed people in the world), being goated by the likes of ((Zelensky)) and ((Nulandman)) to fight to their last man with the weapons the West keeps gladly sending over (they don't even have to pay for it, Western taxpayers do). You can't make this shit up.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/22 06:42 PM
4

The West will buttfuck Ukraine like they did Russia in the 1990s. All the banks, energy sector, telcos and mass media will be privatized and controlled by foreign capital. Certain ethnic group that Zelensky belongs to will constitute most of the new billionaires. Birth rates will dwindle, educated youth will mass emigrate, and "New Europeans" will be imported as replacements. Ştrategic US army bases will pop up like they did in Kosovo and the brainwashed populace will think they are "safe" by be…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/22 12:43 PM
1

Stalin intentionally starved millions of Ukrainians in the Holodomor No he didn't, it was a class warfare and millions of ethnic Russians and other ethnicities were also starved to death. The term "Holodmor" was propagandized by Ukrainians fascist diaspora in Canada to rhyme with Holocaust
/r/TheRedPill23/04/22 12:35 PM
1

Female chimpanzees are much less selective than human females though. They literally mate with any male that attempts. and yet despite this, chimpanzee alpha male fathers 50% of all kids in the pack, and his co-alphas 30-40% of the rest. sure the rest get some placating sex, but they don't get to reproduce, and they know their place at the penalty of death. That's why alphas in chimp tribes have to be on the lookout for other low status males all the time and use violence towards them when neces…
/r/TheRedPill07/12/21 10:28 PM
1

Virginity was prized only when marriage was invented, before that in hunter/gatherer humans probably didn't even had concept for virginity Read an anthropology 101 text book bro, don't embarrass yourself. There was social hierarchy like in every animal group. Boys have the urge to compete and create hierarchy even before puberty. Not all animals (not even all primates) are hierarchical. Homo sapiens are absolutely not like chimpanzees where you have alpha male that breeds the females (along with…
/r/TheRedPill06/12/21 08:43 AM
3

but the earliest recorded evidence of marriage was recorded 2350 B.C. and because it wasn't recorded in writing, it means it didn't exist? are you perhaps a liberal? your train of thought fits that political leaning It is also know that until some point in time some tribes didn't have reproductive consciousness, which means they didn't knew that sex leads to marriage no it's not, you're full of shit. paternity perhaps was not well understood but everyone knew sex=reproduction. and virginity (to …
/r/TheRedPill05/12/21 12:26 PM
4

How was it controlled then? Were there there sophisticated religious institutions back then who held hypergamy in check or some kind of marriage overseer? Hunter gatherer societies had population of maximum of 300 people, basically everyone knew everyone. You don't need "sophisticated" cultural institutions when simple gossip would suffice. Every marriage can simply be "overseen" by everyone else in the tribe. Marriages were arranged in order to solidify intra-tribal or intra-family alliances, a…
/r/TheRedPill03/12/21 05:41 PM
10

. Essentially this is a digression back to the days before humans started forming larger communities and built the first civilizations. Hypergamy was the status quo in prehistoric times. Not this bullshit again. Hypergamy and non-monogamy was never "usual", not even in the era of hunter-gatherer societies which accidentally covers 95% of our species' history. All the hunger-gatherer societies are egalitarian, and in all of them female sexuality was controlled, and 85-90% of marriages was arrange…
/r/TheRedPill03/12/21 12:44 AM
25

it has started as a race to the bottom when the women were given voting rights. the fix is thus very simple. I actually wonder at which percentage of young male population being virgins/incels/bottom feeders will the system implode? or is it just going to be a demographic takeover by patriarchal systems such as Islam, and both non-attractive western men and overpriced western women will die out together
/r/TheRedPill23/08/21 12:45 PM
1

Aborigines, European Whites and Asians underwent completely separate evolutions for 30-50k, depending on the date of their initial migration. Later migrations and intermixing in the historical period obscured the picture a bit, but the evolution was almost 100% isolated. There was also a lot of splits and admixings within the continental race, but there was next to none contacts between continental races. In the border areas of course there would be "transitional" races, those didn't impact the …
/r/TheRedPill20/08/21 04:46 PM
3

My theory is non white races were mostly used as workers or slaves long back by whites. no they didn't, whites diverged genetically 45-50k years ago from Africans, and Asians about 35k years ago. there was almost no interaction between races across continents until few centuries ago because human mobility was very low. blacks also are extremely divergent internally and not a single "race"
/r/TheRedPill14/08/21 09:50 AM
1

The point is that dumb racists with low IQ what does being a racist have anything to do with low IQ? I know extremely intelligent racists, as well as extremely dumb "anti-racists" (I've put quotation marks because they are actually racists but too dumb to recognize it, since they endorse equality of outcome, affirmative action and similar discriminatory practices).
/r/TheRedPill14/08/21 09:34 AM
1

maybe if you volunteer your mother, wife, sister and daughter we could try replicating it?
/r/TheRedPill14/08/21 09:26 AM
1

and why the fuck would you not be able to replicate this particular study? is there anything methodologically wrong with it? are you seriously arguing that just because some studies in some shit fields cannot be replicated, every study needs to be taken with a grain of salt? gtfo
/r/TheRedPill13/08/21 10:26 PM
1

it's a peer reviewed study published in a legitimate journal, cited by many others. you're a fucking retard. gtfo
/r/TheRedPill13/08/21 09:46 PM
1

We dont know what exactly makes a man attractive and the actual percentage breakdown We absolutely can, there were many studies on this. Real studies, not fucking tinder data lol. For example: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5745404/ "Three sets of photographs of men's bodies were shown to raters who estimated either their physical strength or their attractiveness. Estimates of physical strength determined over 70% of men's bodily attractiveness. Additional analyses showed that tall…
/r/TheRedPill13/08/21 06:59 PM
2

studies have shown that face is about 50% of looks, height and muscles are the rest 50% but face can also be improved with proper haircut, hygene, low bodyfat and even surgery but if you also max out on non-physical stuff (money, status, education/knowledge) your total score can still be very high women only have looks, the rest are irrelevant in the sexual marketplace. and they max it out maximally using makeup, clothes etc. most women are pretty ugly actually
/r/TheRedPill13/08/21 11:31 AM
2

Alpha male is just an abstraction to separate arousing traits from attracting traits indeed but you didn't explicitliy mention it as such. you mention it in the context of that of dominance hierarchy, such as it is used with chimpanzees, wolves, gorillas etc. there are no alpha males in the history of homo sapiens that monopolized the women for reproduction, such society never existed. neither is disproportionality in reproduction rates between men and women due to women "choosing" the preferred…
/r/TheRedPill10/08/21 06:17 PM
2

indeed, we need a systematic solution that operate at a societal level, and not some stupid "pull yourself by the bootstraps" advice because "it's all your fault". it's an oppresion operating at a systematic level, it deserves a systematic response. such a lack of empathy by men towards their fellow men shows me that there is almost no hope
/r/TheRedPill10/08/21 05:01 PM
1

Still doesn't change that NO ONE OWES YOU SEX. actually it kind of does. society has a duty to provide each man a mate, otherwise when enough men don't have a stake in the future of society, they ten to burn it down. it has happened many times in the past and civilization regressed. access to reproductive vaginas is a biological imperative for men. if you don't think that is the case, don't be surprised to be at the receiving end of some violent revolution, or some street robber who was the fift…
/r/TheRedPill10/08/21 04:51 PM
2

You can find genetic studies of our ancestors showing breeding has never happened 1:1 between male and female and that the ratios fluctuate from anywhere between 1:3 to 1:17 male to female. Fewer men had access to reproduction than women. not this alpha male bullshit again. every single pre-agricultural (hunter-gatherer) society that anthropologists know of was egalitarian, where each man had (at least) one woman. all post-agriculture sedentary societies normalized egalutarian pair-bonding via m…
/r/TheRedPill10/08/21 04:10 PM
4

it's not a hate group, it's just raw femininity on a public display. once you strip away all the lies and cultural masks, FDS is what is left this allows women to completely control the sexual market and just use top tier men for sex while forcing the other 90 percent of men to pay for their lifestyles, benefits etc via taxation, welfare etc. this is the feminist dream, and in fact it was written by many feminist writers. they wouldn't mind killing most of the men, and would breed the most attra…
/r/TheRedPill10/08/21 01:19 PM
11

Pericles himself, possibly the greatest statesman ever to draw breath, was manipulated behind the scenes by what we would today call a brothel madam and former whore The greatest Byzantine emperor Justinian, who built Hagia Sophia and is worshipped as a saint, married a brothel whore. She on the other hand hooked up Justinian's top general Belisarius with her whore friend who prior to meeting him already had a bunch of children with various men. Those were the most powerful, cream-of-the-crop al…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/21 06:58 PM
1

CRISPR will bring in the day and age of a whole new level of racism. It will be the genetic elitists vs the primitive, unaltered, genetic freeballing mongrels which are basically the people of today, only more economically suppressed and unable to afford such modifications. We can't make large-scale modification in the genome that affect traits such as intelligence, height, beauty etc and we never will. Genes don't work like that, there is no "on" and "off" switch for complex traits. CRISPR tech…
/r/TheRedPill12/12/20 11:12 AM
7

In EE divorce rates are at 50% or more, and fertility rates are even lower than in the West. It's BS that women are more conservative and family-oriented. If anything, they are even nastier gold digging hoes
/r/TheRedPill18/09/20 08:08 PM
1

joints an connective tissue in general develop slower than muscles, but residual pain is usually a good giveaway that you need to dial down on weights. barbell squat in particular is a dangerous exercise because it's biomechanically unsound. human spine simply did not evolve to carry load in that position and knees are stronger than quads because they need to absorb the force created when running which is several times your bodyweight, and not because we needed to carry weights on our back up an…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/20 05:03 PM
3

that is all BS. powerlifters don't go below parallel because they don't have to, and neither do pro bodybuilders who don't even lock out. deep squats are just bro science by idiots. 95% of guys don't have the mobility to pull them out properly
/r/TheRedPill17/08/20 06:52 AM
1

why squat partial ROM when a full ROM takes care of all ranges? you're just making your training unnecessarily inefficient. because going below parallel won't cause your quads to grow more or get stronger. and most guys don't have the mobility to properly execute it and will butt wink
/r/TheRedPill16/08/20 08:55 PM
2

If your tribe consists of 50 females and 50 males, the maximum neonates you can have next year is 50. So if you go to war and lose 25 males, you can still have 50 babies next year. But if you lose 25 females, you can only have 25 babies next year. Then your rival tribe can conquer you. So it’s protect the women at all costs. This shouldn’t come as a surprise to any of you. it's actually exactly the opposite: if you don't have enough men to protect the tribe, others will conquer you. hunter-gathe…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/20 11:06 PM
2

mods delete this degeneracy
/r/TheRedPill21/06/20 11:10 AM
2

In times of trouble and grief, you will see who truly cares for you and who are actually there for you. nah it's only then when it becomes glaringly obvious and you cannot ignore it. there were probably countless previous times where red flags manifested themselves, but we chose to ignore them because they are not that important, because of sunk cost fallacy or because of our self-delusion usually due to ego.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/20 07:49 AM
2

age of consent laws are actually early 20th century fiction, and they were forced by women who were afraid that their men would leave them for younger hotter migrant women. it also nicely fits into the depopulation agenda of the elites human species is 300,000 years old, and for more than 99% of its history women were impregnated on average at the age of 14 end of discussion
/r/TheRedPill17/06/20 01:54 AM
1

ah the bush bitch I still watch Eddie's stand up shows from time to time, and it blows my mind how red-pilled he was decades ago when was only 20 years old
/r/TheRedPill19/05/20 02:57 PM
0

Stupid ad hominems blah blah. yes they are lying, just as WHO lied, China lied and politicians keep lying. they're inflating the number of deaths to justify the measures which killed the economy. Yes, I mentioned the flu in the first place, because that's a virus with an actual 0.1% death rate. (one of the many sources) that's just one flue season not flu in general. it depends on the virus and the demographcs. old country and sick people (like majority in the US) = lots of deaths. that season w…
/r/TheRedPill08/05/20 06:26 PM
0

What? How does it even matter? old people are more sick because they have weaker immune system and other chronic diseases. so the virus can finish them off easier. 90% of the dead are 70+. if you are below 50 and get a virus chances are 1:10 000 iirc Do you mean demographically? Why isn't Germany having the same issue then? people are healthier and better healthcare. not all parts of Italy have the same issue either like Bergamo which is the most polluted region in Europe. newer evidence also sh…
/r/TheRedPill08/05/20 04:40 PM
-2

italy has a population of 60 million, so it should have 60k dead in total. but also it's very polluted and old country, so about 100k sounds. not good, but not bad either. italy's crude death rate is about 0.1% under normal circumstances anyway, I bet at lest half of those cases would overlap and real excessive mortality is even below 0.1%
/r/TheRedPill07/05/20 07:37 PM
2

tell me a country where it's 0.2% or higher
/r/TheRedPill07/05/20 06:37 PM
3

those are stats from China, Italy and several other countries. this week they did mass testing in many countries in Europe and when you extrapolate the percentage of those who have had the virus to the entire population, you get about the same percentage, 0.15% max.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/20 05:34 PM
5

it's not a false flag, it really is a virus but it has been blown out of proportion (mere 0.1% mortality rate across all age groups, 90% of deaths are 70+) and authorities in almost every country opportunistically took advantage of it to increase the power of the government. judging by the lethargic responses of the masses, technocratic dictatorship seems like inevitability at this point. the only redeeming feature of this virus is, given how relatively harmless it is, the next time another glob…
/r/TheRedPill07/05/20 05:27 PM
1

The 80/20 Principle it's not that good of a book imho but the principle is still valid. the actual takeaway imho should be the emphasis on the last 20%, that it takes 80% of effort and is simply not worth it and you're wasting your time unless it's your actual life goal
/r/TheRedPill04/05/20 12:29 AM
1

survey on this and found that happiness didn't increase with income after 75k - because you can buy things you want and need, you can have a little fun with the money that's pretty close to 80% income percentile. there is a book on applying pareto principle to every facet of your life, including learning new stuff. the only thing where a man should be near 100% expert is in very few areas that are related to his job/mission, and for everything else goals should be 80%
/r/TheRedPill03/05/20 11:39 PM
1

the chains were made because stakes were too high and women had no choice. for the 95% of our species history women were married and impregnated on average by the time they were 14 years old. a huge percentage of births were from rape (by their mates or other men), that's why most women have rape fantasies and can branch swing in a blink of an eye. we bred these hoes, and the only way it can be fixed is by breeding them out. 10,000 year ago woman who wouldn't want to give it up for an invader wh…
/r/TheRedPill24/04/20 12:06 AM
1

they came through culture not genetics. gene and culture interact and co-evolve together. it's no accident that the resurgence of female hypergamy in this era coincides with devolution of cultural norms. if we reestablish the norms it won't fix the underlying biological problem. unbridled female sexuality has already caused destruction of many civilizations throughout the recorded history, it's not a new problem but only now can we properly analyze it and put it into a perspective. I say we shou…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/20 11:19 PM
2

there is no evidence for that. women's brains are stuck with the mating strategies that stopped being relevant a long time ago, way before races split
/r/TheRedPill23/04/20 04:41 PM
10

Feminism will destroy itself eventually. Both pussy-worshiping simps and career-oriented hoes waiting for Mr Big until their ovaries dry up will be bred out of gene pool. In each successive generation men will be a bit more red-pilled, and women will be a bit more homely and conducive to early motherhood. I say screw the controlled SMP - that's what got us into this trouble in the first place. Let the nature take care of the problem itself. We need directed breeding of women not another set of c…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/20 02:54 PM
27

vet hard boys. for me women from broken households are a no-go zone for gfs, only usable for PnD. if her parents are together and she doesn't have a healthy relationship with her dad, it's 95% certain that she is a ho as well. you want the type of a woman that would take care of her parents if they end up bed-ridden. behavioral traits are largely genetic, so her parents are a good proxy for how she will end up in the old age (both physically and mentally)
/r/TheRedPill22/04/20 06:55 PM
4

yeah, the moment someone "young" dies it's all over the media. and then you scratch the surface and you see that the young adult with "no underlying symptoms" was an obese fuck. death rates for those under the age of 50 across the entire population is 0.1%, and that is mostly sick people anyway that would've died from other pathogens or walking down the street. it's all lies to protect the sorry boomer asses
/r/TheRedPill15/04/20 08:15 AM
2

there is no "fairness" in death, ti happens and you could die from any cause. smoking kills an order of magnitude more people each year than this corona virus would if it infected the entire population this moment. your argument is dumb emotional appealing and what-if. personally, I don't give a shit what happens to the entire boomer generation, they can drop dead all and I wouldn't give two shits..
/r/TheRedPill15/04/20 08:12 AM
0

This is the difference between 500,000 deaths, 5 million, or even more. If you infect a population and 4% dies from it because that's just out of your control, then you work to control that which you can control, which is to LIMIT HOW MANY PEOPLE GET IT IN THE FIRST PLACE. you can't limit it, the virus is too contagious. and even if you can, you can't save people because they can be reinfected even if they survive the first infection. and the 4% figure is way overblown, the reliable per 1M data …
/r/TheRedPill14/04/20 10:57 PM
1

shouldn't 10mg of zinc per day be enough? that's the dosage I'm taking
/r/TheRedPill14/04/20 10:45 PM
2

It's insane to me that people think a 99.99% effective quarantine is going to eliminate a virus that spreads as easily as CoVID. This is simply slowing the spread, destroying our economy to save the lives of the old people who make the laws. And the funniest shit is, these dinosaurs convinced the healthy young work force to throw their lives away to spare the boomers, and these millennial retards gladly took the bait without thinking twice. How boomers have managed the fuck the economy once more…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/20 10:28 PM
3

The funniest thing is, in three months since this virus has traveled the globe, just about anyobdy could have dropped significant amount of excessive fat, stopped smoking (you lung starts to recover even just a week after you quit smoking) and improve your immune system significantly with better nutrition and workout. It still wasn't late. And yet, I doubt less than 1% did. I pity old people but they are at the end of the life anyway so it's not a waste. For everyone else, there was literally no…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/20 10:21 PM
1

Or is it the case that you have twice as many female ancestors as male ancestors because high-quality males made an average of two babies and low-quality males made an average of zero. not again this bullshit. there were no "alphas" in hunter-gatherers, they were egalitarian. human ancestors since almost 2 million years ago were egalitarian. humans are not chimpanzees were alpha males and their few close associates monopolize uteri, and never have been. the reason why you have more male than fem…
/r/TheRedPill12/04/20 11:53 AM
2

a lot of people know the meaning of life is to shag and have tons of babies, old people knew this inherently, but with the red-pill they can relearn this as a science I disagree, they knew jack shit. old people were forced to marry very young by their families, or by social expectations (everyone was doing it). those same old people didn't do anything to maintain the social structure that has benefited them and generations before. instead, they worked actively to destroy it, and the fuck the eco…
/r/TheRedPill12/03/20 10:14 AM
1

dude, 150kg BP at 75- for juniors puts you literally in the 85th spot at the all-time list worldwide. It's not super-elite, but it's definitely elite.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/20 01:08 AM
1

he's not a natty. everyone with "mind-blowing" strength and the lack of muscle mass to support it is on PEDs
/r/TheRedPill12/03/20 01:04 AM
0

I don't think you have a clue what living in Islamic country looks like. Even Arabians and Iranians (where capital punishment laws still exist) are mostly pussy-whipped simps and (in case of Iranians) in financial servitude to the missus and her family. It's a far cry from early Islam.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/20 12:37 AM
2

Better ask why the Vikings, Goths and Norsemen emigrated to Iceland and conquered the rest of the Europe. The ones that were left in the Scandinavia were the compliant collectivist cucks genetically primed for feminism and open borders.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/20 12:26 AM
4

I don't think I've ever made this amount of effort to fuck a woman (and nor I plan to).
/r/TheRedPill12/03/20 12:09 AM
2

I think you need to read up on the trilateral commission bilderberg group and agenda 21 etc. rich and powerful people socialize and try to consolidate their wealth and power? happened since time immemorial. No one fucking tells you how to live and the information isnt available until after you have suffered through it or lived outside it. Exactly, and that's how it's supposed to work. truth isn't for everyone. most people are too dumb to accept the red pill, let alone some darker truths on the f…
/r/TheRedPill03/03/20 07:17 AM
3

they put hormone blockers in almost all our products we consume on a daily basis. tell us to eat breakfast cereal give us a bad food pyramid which is a bunch of lies. They put soy in all our food and genetically modify everything while blasting our meat with growth hormone and steroids. eat organic, buy meat from trusted farmers outside the city, cook your own food...yeah it takes time and money, but it can be done. It's easier to just go eating at McDonald's and drink soda filled with sugar. ob…
/r/TheRedPill01/03/20 08:38 PM
7

There is no conspiracy, it's mostly disparate financial incentives. Eating healthy food, drinking quality water and exercising requires conscious sustained effort and investing money for benefits that are not immediately tangible, which is something that 80% of people lack. They can be motivated by immediate or short-term results, but something that builds to a lifetime-worth of progress in looks, longevity and health is beyond their gratification span. I used to think like you, but now I in fac…
/r/TheRedPill01/03/20 02:05 PM
1

We've been patrilocal and patrilineal since 6 million years ago. Not having a son means disrespecting the heritage of your ancestors' Y chromosome.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/20 09:42 PM
0

Kobe was not alpha. He raped a young woman who wouldn't give it up for him, he gave money to his siblings to buy their support for his non-black wife, and he didn't have a son. He's an inspiration for his work ethic, team loyalty and the strength of will but that's it. He's a good guy, but I wouldn't go as far as calling him an alpha. Many high-achieving athletes are weak in their heads, in NBA LeBron is another example. The real alphas were guys like Jordan, Malone and Bird.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/20 03:24 PM
8

Guess who pushed for the age of consent laws, and kept it raising higher and higher? Yeah you guessed it - feminist women, to outlaw their competition, namely young poor women immigrants to the US who would give it up for anyone willing to marry them.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/20 11:59 PM
1

This is the correct answer. Feminism has manifested itself in many failed civilizations in their last stages, read "The fate of empires" by Glubb. It's a symptom not a cause. Once the society accumulates enough excessive wealth, social structure falls apart, starting from extended family, then to nuclear family and finally with individuals themselves (trans and androgynous degenerates). That which was once a necessity is now a hindrance. It can be reset either by a war (which destroys wealth) or…
/r/TheRedPill27/01/20 09:10 PM
2

Your anecdotal evidence is irrelevant in general scheme of things. Even if 10% of women would be "competent", it's still too much of a hassle to suffer the rest of the 90% being given opportunity, which inevitably leads to shit described in the article.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/20 08:42 PM
1

last year I absolutely crushed the market getting over 60% growth (as well as 50% growth in my dividend portfolio) Last year most major tech stocks have seen obscene growths. When the next crisis hits that will all retrace massively. Those growth figures are completely unsastainable and they will get crushed down. Over the long term, you will _not- be beating indexes.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/20 08:15 PM
1

If you stop working out you'll also lose muscles. As I said, vast majority of streoid users are on it for life. What is your point exactly? I'm in my third year of lifting, I'm not huge but I'm pretty strong and still on almost linear progress. I can't complain.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/20 03:36 PM
1

What about 4 weeks after they stop taking supraphisiological doses of steroids? What about all the time after that? Where are the results at those times? The study doesn't account for that. it doesn't matter really, that wasn't the original point argued. and let's be honest, the vast majority guys on drugs do it for a lifetime so it doesn't matter. they get addicted to low-effort gains and big muscles. of course they'll lose shitload of lean muscle mass off-cycle, but if you want to grow muscle …
/r/TheRedPill23/01/20 11:15 AM
1

Yes that's literally how it works. If you take steroids without working out, you will gain more muscle and strength than someone who works out without using steroids.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/20 10:46 PM
-1

I don't juice, but I'm just saying that you can literally buy muscles with steroids, and it's very cheap as well (cheaper than most quality supplements)
/r/TheRedPill13/01/20 09:05 AM
-1

You can’t buy big muscles Yes you can, it's called steroids.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/20 08:57 PM
2

Call me a narcissist or a slave to my ego, but I felt relieved to be from under their thump. As if I had to be grateful to them for letting me sleep in a bunk bed with other Vietnam war vets who are coughing up a lung and spreading the flu around. Goddammit the entire Western civilization needs to be burned to the ground.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/20 11:55 PM
1

I see it here in RedPill all the time. 'What is the perfect haircut, the perfect approach, the perfect line, perfect frame control, perfect answer to some bitch's text'. my favorite: the perfect training split, the perfect exercise selection, the perfect set of supplements, the perfect number of sets and rep ranges etc. just pick any fucking program, stick to it for three years, and you're near 80% of your genetic potential. all training programs and methods ultimately lead to the same goal, ove…
/r/TheRedPill09/01/20 11:44 PM
2

On the other end of spectrum you have the "getting the job done" programmers who utilize black-box libs and copy/paste code, do zero documentation/comments, hack shit away in huge methods or incomprehensible one-liners, and you end up with a patchwork of a system that one dares to make significant changes to because no one understands it all and it could all easily crash. You need to balance both approaches.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/20 06:20 PM
3

Or wait for "perfect" conditions to go to the gym. Whenever it's bad weather it's funny how gym attendance drops like 50% or more.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/20 06:14 PM
1

Treat women as inferior beings which they are. They cannot be loyal, self-reflect on their behavior or love you sefllessly. They can only get tingles for alpha seed. However you can keep them in check by successively impregnating them. Otherwise you're just wasting your time.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/20 05:50 PM
1

The government can't ban drugs because there is so demand. drugs can be 100% banned and the only reason why they are not is because they serve a purpose, from keeping the lower classes occupied to intelligence agencies making money it will be available either elsewhere or illicitly in the U.S. artificial wombs are banned in like dozen countries, why doesn't some other country develop them? because no one else has the tech. True, but irrelevant. The advantageous genes will be highly valuable and …
/r/TheRedPill02/01/20 11:20 PM
1

They said the same thing about computers. dna editing is not a mass-produced consumer good. it's a controlled, regulated tech. it's literally illegal to even cut yourself or consume plants that you grow in your own garden, that's how much health industry is regulated. it's a cartel, and is extremely resistant to consumerism. doctors and pharma want your money, and they want it only through licensed dealers. And even if only the rich have access -- which I doubt will be the case forever -- the de…
/r/TheRedPill02/01/20 08:37 PM
1

It is the nature of technology to get more reliable and cheaper. It's only a matter of time. some tech is too dangerous, it will never happen. perhaps for the ultra-rich and powerful only, and only in a very limited set of scenarios (prenatal screening), but it will never be available to everyone, at this moment for the insurance reason alone. we don't know jack shit about how DNA maps to actual physiological processes and will not for at least 50 years. This does not matter. All that matters is…
/r/TheRedPill02/01/20 05:17 PM
1

designer babies will never happen, there is too much uncertainty with gene editing and no insurance will cover for it. perhaps in 200 years, if at all. "good" and "bad" genes are human constructs, such things don't exists, and each trait in its extreme form comes with a cost. e.g. you can have super-high IQ without some neurodegenerative disorders or social dysfunctions, be seven feet tall without significantly reducing your life span and endangering health etc. since artificial wombs for humans…
/r/TheRedPill31/12/19 10:47 PM
1

the root of the problem is the monetary/banking system in the whole world who steals our ages from everyone using taxes and inflation both genders are victims of the banking cartel unless we fix that, then these problems affecting men and women will continue banking cartel exists in the traditional societies as well, and has been for centuries. there children take care of their parents and elder relatives. it's a matter of culture and instilled values
/r/TheRedPill25/12/19 04:48 PM
2

fun fact: "witches" in the Middle Ages that were burned at a stake where mostly equivalent to modern whores. perhaps they are feeling a subconscious connection lol
/r/TheRedPill25/12/19 04:43 PM
1

Human beings are essentially arrogant children who think they outwitted nature. Uhm, we have outwitted nature. There is no more natural selection, and pretty soon there will be no sexual selection. There already isn't the latter for those smart enough to carve their own futures.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/19 04:31 PM
1

We are in an era, though, where they are trying to sell cuckoldry as just another life choice, and where a woman can cuckold a man, throw it in his face, and receive no real punishment. So women today are less incentivized to keep it a secret. we indeed are, but that situation is NOT normal, and never has been in the history of our species. it will reset itself hard because it's not sustainable
/r/TheRedPill21/12/19 07:30 PM
1

Once again, adultery was very rare because it was punishable by death. Read ancient Germanic law codes yourself. In the Middle Ages lots of those laws were relaxed in urban communities, but it's still prevalent to this day in e.g. Islamic countries. I've recall reading a vivid a story on late 19th century how in Crimea peasants marched a cheating woman across the village, beating and humiliating her. It really was a serious fucking matter. Priests indulged in sex as did popes themselves. But che…
/r/TheRedPill20/12/19 09:04 AM
1

Looks like you need a trip to some distant country. With a new cell phone.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/19 05:01 PM
1

the chief and elders probably created a lot of bastards while the younger men were off drilling or fighting No they didn't, adultery was punishable by death.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/19 12:49 PM
1

You are mixing IQ and intelligence. IQ determined by is genetic potential (intelligence), education and proper feeding.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/19 12:39 PM
2

Turning into a socialism has nothing to do with female leadership or vote. It was men that lead the charge on and voted in 99% of the socialist policies, including women's suffrage. Of course at one point socialist avalanche becomes self-sustaining, but before that happened the snow ball was pushed steadily for a long time by an endless horde of dumb men.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/19 12:25 PM
3

Poor people have children as an insurance policy even in piss-poor countries where there is no government subsidy. there is basically inverse correlation between GDP and total fertility rate. The same correlation is valid within every country for per household income. Vast majority of the born children are poor countries and the poor people within rich countries.
/r/TheRedPill07/12/19 02:02 PM
1

“something cultural happened” yes. yes, it’s called hypergamy. no it isn't, women didn't have any reproductive choice back then
/r/TheRedPill07/12/19 09:30 AM
2

if only 1 man is reproducing for 17 women and men and women of appropriate age are about equal in the population how else could this be happening it's called war and cultural change which enabled some groups significantly higher reproductive success. it just happened at some point in time, it wasn't a persistent ratio throughout human history. it has nothing to do with hypergamy either. in a few generations that ratio gets eliminated in favor of a more stable one 1.x : 1
/r/TheRedPill07/12/19 09:27 AM
8

In 2019 USA, with it's emphasis on couples, rich men vastly out-reproduce poor men, at a guess by 2:1 Complete bullshit, today poor people have significantly higher reproduction rates than rich people, regardless whether they are men or women. That has not been the case in history though, but now it is.
/r/TheRedPill07/12/19 08:52 AM
16

Average woman had exactly zero reproductive choice in early agricultural societies, and up until very recent history. It's the reason why their general sexual preferences are still stuck on the stone age criteria. They could have individual preferences, but their choices could be overridden by the family. Those that wouldn't want to get married, were lesbians etc. would end up in nunneries and such.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/19 04:10 PM
-6

This has nothing to do with hypergamy.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/19 04:07 PM
0

if you want an intelligent son, adopt a jewish son. if you want a strong son, adopt an eastern european. why reproduce using your genes because jewish IQ genes lead to neurodegenerative desease, eastern european strength genes are correlated with stupidity and corruption. only my genes are perfect, and only I can make an educated choice to mix them with other genes especially if you were raised in a shitty household? that's completely irrelevant, no one chooses where and how they were raised. be…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/19 08:43 AM
2

the point is doing heavy deadlifts and its variant supplemental lifts eventually will grow your traps like no dumbbell shrug can that is just pure bullshit
/r/TheRedPill03/12/19 02:34 PM
1

parent-child relationship cannot be properly established unless there is genetic connection nordics don't have the highest IQ, ashkenazi jews and northern Asians do africans are not physically the most powerful, eastern europeans are
/r/TheRedPill03/12/19 08:57 AM
1

How the hell did we get the carcasses back to camp? carrying something on your back while walking is not the same as deadlifting. it's mostly an aerobic exercise. and the weight is not that large, and multiple men would carry each their own piece. the dead lift movement as it is done today is not natural in any sense. in fact, it's so unnatural that you have to unlearn your instinctual movements when picking something up from the ground (like curving your back). I'm personally entirely uninteres…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/19 08:15 PM
3

Nope. I am lean and muscular. Perhaps, but 90% of people doing deadlifts are fat asses. There's no point in doing curls because it's not a natural human movement pattern. if it's not a natural movement we wouldn't have had elbow flexors. human ancestors used the movement as did we for the last 200k years since we began hunting and preparing food using man-made tools. you want to know what is unnatural? sqats and deadlifts. spine hasn't evolved to handle any kind of excessive pressure on your bac…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/19 06:37 PM
14

both are pathetic. rock bands with artificial "value" inflated by media propaganda are but a symptom of degeneracy. there is nothing impressive about fucking a bunch of dumb women who throw themselves at you because they hope you get them pregnant so that they can milk you.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/19 05:33 PM
3

I am doing curl because I'm smart enough to make a program that makes use of them. In your case, I guess there is no point doing curls if your arms are covered with an inch of fat anyway.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/19 05:19 PM
1

I posed this to the OP as well: if someone had vile parents, why reproduce and continue their filthy genetic legacy? you have 50% each of your parent's genome, and double digit percentage of those are alleles that weren't even activated in them. your children will have 25% of both of them, within and 5,6 generations anything "bad" could get selected against and reduced to 2,3%. your particular genetic heritage is actually irrelevant in terms of evolution, the only thing that matters is the filte…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/19 01:54 PM
2

If all men knew just how dumb, materialistic, vain and deluded women truly were, we'd have sharia instituted before nightfall.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/19 01:15 PM
3

deadlift is one of the dumbest exercises ever if your goal is to develop your entire body. most bodybuilders never do it. doing any kinds of programs that include 1RM and rep ranges less than 6 as well. almost all the powerlifters are unhealthily fat and each and every one has a history of injuries (that's why they hate Larry Wheels so much, cause he shows that you can both look good and be strong). if you want to be a competitive lifter or have a fetish for strength that's a another thing, but …
/r/TheRedPill02/12/19 12:45 PM
6

I do think it's pityful that some men resent people like this for what they do. men like them are the reason why the civilization is in the pitiful state it is. there is nothing to glorify about fucking groupies, both are pathetic
/r/TheRedPill02/12/19 10:49 AM
2

Upper middle class and above white women have low divorce rates. IIRC education is irrelevant, divorce rates per partner count are the same. it is probable though that the more educated woman is the less promiscuous she is
/r/TheRedPill28/11/19 05:46 PM
1

Another way is leaving the smaller cities and studying in the bigger where no one knows them, then play virgins when they come back. I know a dozen girls who did exactly that. One was fucking different tourists every week and then at 25 she came back to her backwoods city and married a dude down the street that she's been "dating" since high school. In "traditional" countries such as Eastern Europe and Balkans divorce rates are just as high as in the West, i.e. near 50%. The hypergamy is here, h…
/r/TheRedPill28/11/19 09:10 AM
0

She'll pair bond just fine. The fucked up women who can't pair bond are the ones who end up with the stupid high n-counts, that's nonsense, the difference in probability of a divorce between a woman with an n-count of one to n-count of zero is larger between a woman of an n-count 20 to n-count of one. there might be exceptions of course, but for the statistical majority, unless she's a virgin, she's permanently damaged
/r/TheRedPill28/11/19 09:05 AM
10

Women listen to messengers, not messages. That used to be grandmothers, who were 2 generations apart and could take a lifetime-span look on the decisions the women of their generation took in their youth. Today with broken families and women giving birth very late there are no grandmothers around, and consequently no such advice.
/r/TheRedPill28/11/19 08:53 AM
2

I wonder if a drug could be developed to reset the nervous system's tolerance towards chemicals that cause the effect of "falling in love". Perhaps sluts and alpha-widows can be redeemed, just put them on that therapy just before the wedding and enjoy the first love experience. Also every 3-4 years into the marriage as well, just in case lol
/r/TheRedPill28/11/19 08:43 AM
2

It's also important to take not of the opposite stuff women say and do - these are actions that are beyond her control, her genetically hard-wired behaviors that she evolved not to understand but simply follow. The stuff that is not hypocritical is the sensible part that they share with men.
/r/TheRedPill28/11/19 08:30 AM
1

it's not an opinion it's a fact. oxytocin is released when a woman orgasms, when she gives births, when she breastfeeds and so on. it is NOT released when two people hug, kiss, cuddle or have orgasm-less sex, and especially not in huge quantities. that a made-up lie invented to give credence to some absurd pet theory
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/11/19 06:34 PM
1

It's not a common knowledge, and what I read on oxytocin release mechanisms none of which include kissing, cuddling, hugs and shit
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/11/19 06:09 PM
1

let me guess - you tried googling it, and first few pages of hits were useless.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/11/19 05:57 PM
1

the orgasm releases oxytocin, which makes her bond to the man which produced it. that aftercare nonsense of yours is just ex post facto
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/11/19 05:36 PM
1

Thousands of studies support this. Here is a decent article, albeit from the Daily Mall: Why don't you link to such a study then? A single one would be fine for me. That shitty daily fail article means nothing.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/11/19 05:31 PM
9

as long as 80% of men are clueless simps that will marry these whores, it's all pointless. you can make them see this tweet as the first thing when they wake up their entire lives, yet they will still grovel at the feet of these whores and give them resources, money and attention.
/r/MGTOW25/11/19 05:22 PM
1

"giving oxytocine to produce effect X" is not the same as "effect X produces oxytocine"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/11/19 05:18 PM
1

However, cuddling, hugs, and orgasmless sex also gives them a huge dose of Oxy. AFAIK this is false. [Citation needed] (clinical studies please)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/11/19 04:56 PM
26

oxytocin and other hormones are literally being released during an orgasm. oxytocin itself is called a hormone of affiliation, and has according to many primatologists been co-opted by evolution as a basis for pair-bonding. Eddie Murhpy noticed this as well long ago XD
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/11/19 04:47 PM
1

there will be no shedding of humanity, just like there was no shedding of our ape ancestors once we ventured from the trees to open savannah and started walking upright, just as there was no shedding of bacteria once the multi-cellular organisms evolved. the weak, dependent, women etc will have their ecological niches, the rest of us will evolve and choose a different path
/r/TheRedPill24/11/19 10:09 PM
1

As a capitalist, im Personally perfectly ok with half my income going to “society” since I have to acknowledge the fact that this “society” provided an environment for me to reach my present (and future) success. of course Uncle Tom. I wonder at which point would you lose allegiance to that society, if stealing 50% of your working income isn't enough. is it when they recruit you and send you to fight against some unknown men in the name of "national security"? when they rape you in the court of …
/r/TheRedPill21/11/19 06:37 PM
2

I want...I...me me me her solipsism is off the charts. write to the Santa bitch, perhaps there are few alpha bucks left in the warehouse
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/11/19 09:24 PM
7

While I was a kid attending a church, old women were the majority of the churchgoers, especially at weird hours such as early morning. An old man that used to hang around there told me that most of these old women praying and going to the mass daily where top sluts when they were younger. I was laughing and thought that he was joking, but now I now he was right all along.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/11/19 10:53 AM
6

it's dual mating strategy in action. securing resources from one type of guy, and securing sperm from another. hamster is providing ad hoc explanations if cognitive dissonance arises. she doesn't regret it one bit, and she never will, and will do the same all over again.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/11/19 10:48 AM
6

No bitch, you don't have any time at 38
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/11/19 10:37 AM
4

40%? Pfff. In Europe the cumulative tax rate is 50-65% of your income depending on the country. For every euro you earn for yourself you earn at least another one for the degenerate leftists communist budget-sucking scum. All in the name of "solidarity", "thinking of the children" etc.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/11/19 04:59 PM
2

I'm from that region and I'm familiar with the people there. Balkans repelled Ottoman, Persian, Arab etc invaders over the centuries, the region was literally six centuries under Ottoman yoke with heavy state-mandated islamicization, blood taxes etc. and yet has managed to repel them. the current problems in Western countries are nothing compared to that. solving them is all a matter of will and consciousness
/r/TheRedPill15/11/19 06:37 PM
2

personally I've been affected 100x more with white folks injustice, stupidity etc. If you're in the US you have essentially the same problem, it's the currently old selfish white folks that outsourced manufacturing to Asia, embraced feminism, saddled their kids with debt and bubble economies etc. In the Eastern Europe countries are experiencing massive youth exoduses and catastrophic birth rates because corrupt old elites are taxing them to death to keep the socialist bubble alive, and at the sa…
/r/TheRedPill15/11/19 03:35 PM
1

artificial wombs research for humans is already banned in a number of developed countries and the tech is in its infancy. I don't think that designed children other than for elimination of simplest Mendelian traits (usually diseases) will ever be ever be a possibility, the genome is simply too complex and there are too many risk factors. marriage will bottom out eventually at some 20-30% rate, and will turn into a social status marker with the religious, well-to-do and others. patriarchal societ…
/r/TheRedPill14/11/19 07:09 AM
0

and the reason i said people cheat, not just women is because men cheat plenty as well from what i've seen, who cheats more... who knows, probably women just cos of the pure access they have to dick. but the key is that I think the reason cheating is so rampant today is that it's just another symptom of a society that is based on consumerism and hedonism. cheating is just another form of that muffin you shouldn't of eaten cos you're a fat fuck. men have cheated since time immemorial. the importa…
/r/TheRedPill13/11/19 03:00 PM
3

Current raw bench press world record holder Julius Maddox started lifting at 25 as well.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/19 10:49 AM
49

David Laid is on steroids, that's anything but "natural transformation" lol. He's also doing 1RM lifts which is absolutely unnecessary to sculpt your body and will only lead to injuries. 8x8 at 70% of 1RM with 30 sec pauses between sets seems a bit excessive to me. I'm doing that kind of weight for four to five sets and I'm dead, usually at/near failure at the last rep. If I did it for 8 sets I wouldn't have had the strength to do more than a single exercise per muscle group.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/19 10:02 AM
3

This Website has the best concise guide I found on stretching. Find the stretching section on the menu on the left. You can also find examples for individual exercises mentioned on youtube.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/19 08:02 PM
5

dynamic warmup can also be done with your main exercises at lower weights with many reps. there is no need for some special warmup sequence for most muscle groups. I only do special warmups for shoulders
/r/TheRedPill12/11/19 07:57 PM
24

that's stupid, because most money tinder makes is from guys
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/11/19 07:52 PM
1

Every man has something he's naturally good at. You need to find what it is give it all to it.
/r/TheRedPill10/11/19 10:47 PM
11

Nature's punishment for whoring in your youth is truly tantalizing. By continuing to attract attention from males wanting to fuck you, it gives you just enough hope that it's not late enough, and then smacks you in the head with such cruel statistics when hope is most needed.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/11/19 08:00 PM
19

I'm not American, but wow. Thanks god for Donald Trump.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/11/19 07:56 PM
27

Better a 30 yr old woman than a 16 yr old to raise a child. Biologically this is a sound no. As a women on her own, she can't raise a child properly, regardless of age.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/11/19 07:48 PM
4

moral of the story? disregard females, acquire currency
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/11/19 07:43 PM
8

I...me...my.... And she wonders why she's single. There is no "I" in a relationship, bitch.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/11/19 04:37 PM
16

Women, by contrast, did not show a marked difference in their attraction to men who might work above or below them. How stupid can you be to believe in this? So was the feminist movement some sort of cruel hoax? The more women achieve, the less desirable they are? Women want to be in a relationship with guys they can seriously talk to -- unfortunately, a lot of those guys want to be in relationships with women they don't have to talk to. Yes, we men are gonna breed "smart women" out of existence…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/11/19 01:07 PM
4

Exactly. Age is irrelevant to increase your value as man. There is even a Jeff Bezos meme for that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/11/19 01:00 PM
2

I don't socialize with fat women at all, let alone date them. To me they are subhumans. I also openly shame fat men.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/11/19 01:04 PM
16

a technologically-driven reproductive utopia using artificial wombs, with the family unit completely dissolved (a bit more likely); laws are already in place prohibiting such research. surrogate mothers are being banned one country after another. the sisterhood will not allow an attack on their vagina monopoly. patriarchy will return naturally, via cultural change and birth rates. hoes like the one in the video will have at most 1-2 kids, if any. The more a woman is feminist, career-driven, peni…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/11/19 05:40 PM
9

I don't share your optimism sadly, as I feel the compulsion to consider women to be more valuable is the result of nature, not nurture. Women are the bottleneck in human reproduction, so the genetic programming to protect them at all costs is what survived the best because the tribe that kept the most women alive and healthy is the one that grew the most. The tribe didn't just protect women, it controlled their breeding. Adulterous women were killed and the tribe made sure that no man was left w…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/11/19 05:27 PM
2

I call out smart women on their physical defects (they are usually a bit overweight), it drives them nuts.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/11/19 11:00 AM
1

no smile = bitch
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/11/19 08:57 AM
29

Somebody tell her that the magic tits spell doesn't work if you have the baby shield active.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/11/19 11:13 PM
2

Major wars wiped out entire generations of men every few decades. The relative peace that we enjoy post-WW2 is a historical anomaly. Women didn't have it "easier" by not being self-sufficient, but at least they were alive.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/11/19 11:10 PM
5

She has an exquisite taste in mate selection I see. Is that fine fellow the father of her child as well?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/11/19 11:07 PM
17

"You don't own me" "I don't see a ring on your finger" "Man's commitment, man's choice"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/11/19 12:54 PM
1

eugenics is happening already naturally by aborting defective foetuses or people maladaptive to the current economic or cultural climate (dumb, irresponsible, lazy, feminist etc.) dying early, being poor or not having kids. not all black folks are "bad", many are good guys that can fit with zero problems into a modern society, much more than many white dysgenic trash that you can find in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. nature always finds a way to pit groups against each others, and personally I'…
/r/TheRedPill07/11/19 09:54 AM
10

hopefully she's childless, which makes another self-indulgent myopic hoe eliminated from the gene pool. so long and thanks for all the pussy, bitch!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/11/19 05:10 PM
1

This is the right thing to do, fight injustice with injustice. I also advise men to install trojan horses on their girlfriends/wives PCs and cell phones. If they can kill your reputation with false accusations, so can you with incriminating photos, texts or videos.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/11/19 10:53 AM
1

The best lays I had were when the women gave it away for free, Now that I think about it, it's true for me as well. Spending money dating should only be reserved for women that have already been screened heavily and have child-bearing prospects. If she has any red flags she's in the hoe category.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/11/19 10:44 AM
127

I also occasionally self-fuck, and not masturbate.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/11/19 10:39 AM
22

When will women learn that men and women are not the same, most men aren't out fucking a different girl every weekend anyway, they aren't balancing some equality thing and how women behave sexually is a big factor in who a man chooses to raise his children and basically promise to take care of forever, even when she is saggy and old? They will never learn. It's up to men to realize that women are biologically self-destructive and that the success of civilization depends on curtailing their sexua…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/11/19 02:05 PM
3

Manipulation, lies, deceit are the core of woman's personality. That is how they live and succeed in a world. Even this post represents a way of her telling herself that she's a "good person".
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/11/19 02:02 PM
6

As is so often the case on this sub, the answer to the question, WAATGM is "back in your 20s where you left them" My favorite answer is: "They went with all the good women". It absolves them from personal responsibility that your answer implies and instead emphasizes their own inadequacies that Good Men thought were deal breakers. Women lack self-awareness and hate being responsible for their own mistakes, but will react to clues as to how to change their own behavior to attract a good man. Perh…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/11/19 10:46 AM
2

Women are entirely clueless that their value resides in their youth. They know. I've been dating early 30s chick recently and the topic of marriage came up. I told her I don't even think about marrying a woman above 30 unless she's at least 3 month pregnant with me, with a healthy fetus, preferably male. I said that as calmly as a judge reading a death sentence verdict. If some "lesser" man told her that in a non-private setting I bet she'd throw a fit. The women in this article know they fucked…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/11/19 10:41 AM
3

You can smell the stench of rotten ovaries from the picture.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/11/19 10:31 AM
6

Unfortunately far too many people still see a college degree as a proxy for intelligence. I speculate the reason for this is due to either laziness or the inability to determine intelligence by those who want a quick means to know the level of intelligence of a given person. Women are too dumb to assess intelligence other than by overt credentials. They are like any other status symbols to them that can be outdone only by an even bigger status symbol. Being super-smart and not having a PhD to th…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/11/19 10:27 AM
1

Now she is looking into the abyssal future of dying alone in a nursing home with no family to give two shits about her. I feel no joy at this. I feel no pity either. She made her choice, over and over, for decades. Actually I feel a bit of Schadenfreude just thinking about her rotting ovaries and the prospect of those cock-carousel riding bitches dying in poverty and solitude in some dilapidated nursing home.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/11/19 10:05 AM
1

An excellent proxy for woman's degree of self-delusion and solipsism is the usage of the first-person pronoun. In this case you can see that she is clearly insane.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/11/19 09:40 AM
0

it's a common usage aspie. see e.g. urban dictionary
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/11/19 04:42 PM
0

in a broader sense, cuck is anyone who lets others exploit him, like a literal cuckold lets his wife being exploited by a bull. having only daughters is a testament to your poor fucking skills, you literally create life that other men will fuck. it's as cuck as you can get
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/11/19 11:02 AM
1

thanks bro, I'll manage from that
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/11/19 12:08 AM
0

if you produce only daughters you are a cuck. real man make sons. See Elon, five sons from the tube
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/11/19 04:12 PM
0

can you please find a link to that study? news article is also fine
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/11/19 01:06 PM
-1

yeah but unless he produced a son, he's still a cuck
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/11/19 01:02 PM
5

I don't blame him but the royal family who blessed the marriage with her. when young Archie turns out to be a classical gangbanger from the hood, it will be all the punishment that they need
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/11/19 12:53 PM
8

these are all projections, I think it will peak at about 30-40%. marriageable cohort of women will have many kids and will eventually self-select and the unmarriagable women coming from divorced parents and broken families will be permanently tainted, and eventually dying out
/r/TheRedPill01/11/19 10:26 PM
10

I used to think this as well, but I don't think artificial wombs and surrogacy can scale society-wide. Marriage as an institution is too resistant. Surrogacy is being banned country after country for the last 20 years. What I think is happen is that simply women that are not naturally feminine, submissive, fearful of being alone in old age, that want to have many children and so on will after several generations replace all the masculine, feminazi, empowered, high-IQ low-fertility bitches that h…
/r/TheRedPill01/11/19 07:47 PM
3

Not only that - blue-pilled simps deserve to be exploited and destroyed by these bitches for being such idiots. If they cannot learn from their own experience, they deserve whatever they get.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/11/19 09:34 AM
2

"Well traveled" means "well ridden." And I don't mean trains, planes and automobiles. Well it could mean trains.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/10/19 01:48 PM
4

If she's not chasing you, you're wasting your time. Only pursue women that give you clear IOIs, and nothing else. Keep increasing your value, attractiveness and wealth, and opportunities will abound.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/10/19 01:44 PM
2

I found this this - longevity loss is about -0.5y/cm. But that's an average across all height groups, the taller you are above average the bigger the loss, after about 190cm it's no longer linear but exponential. relative mortality also increases. again, that's for tall white ethnicities, for other's the cutoff point is different (if the average is lower then it's lower)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/10/19 08:14 AM
2

there are hundreds of studies on that topic, I don't recall which one was that. But you can easily find charts of height vs male mortality - there is a significant exponential rise after 190cm (or lower depending on ethnicity, as height is largely genetic. I'm talking from a perspective of a white guy from EE)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/10/19 07:50 AM
1

In the long run, life is fair. Everyone gets what they deserve. And we here are just diagnosing the mismatch of the input and output at a crucial mid-life age, when it becomes the most apparent.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/10/19 06:28 PM
3

Her "art" video of a random guy having sex with her simulating rape was posted here a few years ago. I pity any guy who gets to marry this crazy bitch.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/19 10:14 AM
2

Exactly. In my former country most of judges are women. It's one of the most corrupt shitholes in Europe.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/19 07:47 PM
3

There is alot of out right hatred in that sub, I guess because they are dealing with alot of the bottom % of males. That would suggest that the SMV of these women isn't high enough to do any better. It's very telling. Exactly. Young, attractive, fertile women need no dating strategy.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/10/19 01:47 AM
3

I don't hate them, I just see them as inferior to men. Children in adult bodies whose choices must be limited.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/19 01:16 AM
5

You don't have any power with modern laws.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/19 01:08 AM
12

Sisterhood Über Alles. This and the fact that women posses no sense of justice or honor. To them, laws are just the rules to follow, or else.. She will milk any man for any dime she can, if she can get away with it.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/19 06:43 PM
2

interesting perspective. do more women than men enter those Gesamtschule and Gymnasiums, like they do in universities now?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/10/19 02:08 PM
3

You don’t see as many tall old guys shuffling about I originate from the region where men are among the tallest in the world (Dinaric Alps). Median height for 18 year olds is like 185cm. you can see plenty of people taller than 2 meters every day in the street even in small towns. I see zero of them in the 70+ year old age bracket. because none exist
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/10/19 02:00 PM
5

190cm (roughly 6'3) is the highest height you can go without any damage to your longevity and agility. anything higher than that and your biomechanics is ruined, and your organs suffer (usually heart). there is a reason why world's strongest men are all around 190cm give or take a few cm. I've read a study on correlation between longevity and height and IIRC above 190cm for every extra one cm you lose about a one year of life.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/10/19 01:53 PM
12

adulterous and cuckolding women were just plainly killed during the 99% of our species history
/r/TheRedPill16/10/19 09:01 AM
7

On the day that I found out, I was like, I wanted to reject her, because I said my boundary was I will not raise another man’s child from an affair. My mom put me straight. She was like, “She’s innocent in this. Don’t blame her.” sisterhood uber alles. women are willing to cuck their own kids in support of it
/r/TheRedPill15/10/19 10:58 PM
5

in the UK suffragettes wanted universal female suffrage, but qualified suffrage for men. it was a man-hating movement from the start, even before they got the right to vote
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/10/19 05:43 PM
3

there is no evidence that intelligence genes are gender-specific. it's a combination of intelligence of both parents that affects the intelligence of children. that being said don't mate with high-IQ woman if you yourself are high-IQ - about one sigma above average (110-120 max) is enough to amplify the hereditary effect of intelligence without risking autism, social retardation or illnesses caused by combining high-IQ alleles.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/10/19 01:40 PM
1

Yes they are, differences in physical strength among men are negligible when it comes to life vs death fight
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/10/19 08:34 AM
1

I'm not advocating that the children be kidnapped, or that people should be randomly sterilized. I'm advocating that it should be the letter of the law, an accepted social norm that is implemented by professionals if conditions align. Progressives have pushed for the laws that get millions of unborn kids murdered every year, or that any man can be financially raped at a court by his wife, or that every man can have his reputation ruined with women's lies (and women lie 99% of everything they say…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/10/19 04:35 PM
1

cutting Fallopian tubes is not violence
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/10/19 04:11 PM
16

that bitch has more red flags than a CPC congress. the extent guys are willing to go just to get some pussy :facepalm:
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/10/19 12:23 AM
1

How, specifically, do you get two thirds female ancestors and one third male ancestors from monogamy? In "normal" circumstances there are already 10-20% more females than males just due to higher male death rates. Add periodic genocides which kill all men but keep women, cuckolding, longer average lifespans for women which could have other mates after their partner's death, better survival fitness for the children of few men that could afford more than one wife.. it could easily add up. That rat…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/10/19 06:19 AM
1

Humans are hierarchical. They follow or lead, but not both. Egalitarianism is not possible because it requires an equal distribution of strengths and weaknesses. In hunter-gatherer societies this is exactly what happens. Everyone is equally "strong" and "powerful". Of 200,000 years of our species' history, that is how we lived for 185,000 years. When human ancestors started to walk on their feet they freed their hands, which enabled usage of tools and weapons. Weapons are the ultimate equalizer …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/19 10:37 PM
1

Also, you give its detractors credit they certainly do not deserve, since the theory has been verified through studies of the human genome. Specifically: Two thirds of our ancestors turns out to have been female, only one third were male. That doesn't really prove anything. "Ancestors" can go arbitrarily distant in hominin history. 6 million years ago we were still mating with the common ancestor of polygamous chimpanzees. Also since men have had much higher mortality than women, both in normal …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/19 10:27 PM
0

hunter-gatherer tribes were not "noble", they were very savage end embroiled in constant warfare. After the dispersion and settling from Africa some 50,000 years ago population growth has basically been stagnant due to the intensity of the warfare. As for the rest of your comment, you must have confused me with someone. you are butthurt that your little "tribal alpha" theory god debunked and now you see enemies in every corner and resort to ad hominem attacks
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/19 05:43 PM
1

they would benefit even more from cutting Fallopian tubes
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/19 02:24 PM
3

baby boomers just have the inverse Midas touch - everything they touched turned to shit. when I hear older men claiming that "there are still good women out there" because xy years ago he married a 19yo virgin who bore him 3 kids and never cheated, I want to punch them in the face.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/19 02:19 PM
3

If Billy had something that Chad wanted, Billy would either have to give it up or be killed. The possibility for a weak man to control resources of any significance is an invention of modern society. Back in the day only alphas controlled resources, although they may have shared with betas in the context of group dynamics. Complete bullshit. Hunter-gatherer bands were egalitarian, there was no alpha. Harem behavior and resource monopolization was eliminated in hominin predecessors almost 2 milli…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/19 10:07 AM
14

Not all women are how you describe. In fact, I would venture a great deal more than you expect. 16 years ago there was no facebook, tinder and smartphones. SMP is completely different now. 19 year old virgin today is the equivalent of a pink unicorn flying across the sky
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/19 09:52 AM
11

And this is fellas why women shouldn't have any voting and reproduction rights, and their marriages should be arranged by their families. Their brains still operate on a stone-age level dynamics.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/19 09:38 AM
4

Begone, thot
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/10/19 05:30 PM
27

The black guys that date white women are usually good guys that are professionals and can’t stand black women. I’m not racist but I cringe at having to talk to black women. They have the worst attitudes in the world just like Indian women. I noticed that too, in bodybuilding where top contestants are usually black, basically all the top guys have white wives. Just look at the last several Mr. Olympias: Ronnie Coleman, Phil Heath, Shawn Rhoden, Brandon Curry etc. So basically it's either trash-tr…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/10/19 04:03 PM
2

to make things clear: top men plowing through many women is not polygamy. If they were actually impregnating them and/or having them as their wives, it would be. Each woman individually dreams of alpha bucks committing to them alone. Personally I think what would indeed push society over the age is actually legalizing polygamous marriage in order to have women "settling for a piece of alpha" in full display. In order words, accelerationism of the development in order to minimize cross-generation…
/r/TheRedPill02/10/19 09:46 AM
9

OK I've skimmed the entire technical report. To make things clear: I don't think those are that important issues. We will adapt. Clean water can be easily obtained from the sea and atmosphere. If need be, CO2 can be reduced using carbon capture. Year ago I crunched some numbers and it took like 0,1% of world GDP to cut global CO2 emissions by something like 30%. Personally I think that 10 times more pressing issues are the extinction of various species (particularly macrofauna) and the pollution…
/r/TheRedPill02/10/19 09:26 AM
8

From your study: In some aspects of the climate system, including changes in drought, changes in tropical cyclone activity, Antarctic warming, Antarctic sea ice extent, and Antarctic mass balance, confdence in attribution to human influence remains low due to modelling uncertainties and low agreement between scientifc studies. There you go.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/19 08:48 AM
11

but the propaganda is real, like the "global warming" stuff that we've been fed with until they realized it's stupid because winters are getting harsher, and now the meaningless "climate change" is the new catch phrase. We get it, anthropogenic climate change is real, but its effects are far overblown and it's being used to push a carbon credit system that the globalists will use to control population. they can all fuck off
/r/TheRedPill01/10/19 11:01 PM
1

Be it islam or not, marriage in virtually every society is a social contract, regulated by law and/or social norms. But it does not mean it can't be biological, since most human interaction and activity is social and biological at the same time. "If it is a social contract, then it can't be biological" is a false dichotomy. monogamous marriage evolved after monogamy. marriage is just a phenotypical extension of the biological reality, extending it to a lifetime bond. polygamous marriages with mo…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre30/09/19 07:31 PM
1

Half of all marriages end in divorce..... maybe where you’re from but where I’m from, maybe about 1/5 end in divorce. You sound like a very pessimistic person. and where do you come frome, 1920s? GTFO
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/19 02:24 PM
1

Many modern Islam countries are no different in sex ratio than non-muslim countries, and they are polygamorous societies. no they are not. marriage in islam is a strict social contract, there is a limit on the number of wives and they come with a bunch of strings attached (you must be able to afford them first and foremost). that is not the same as biological polygamy "fucking many women" is not the same as "polygamy"? no it isn't. fucking is not the same as reproduction, and one man is not the …
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre30/09/19 02:04 PM
1

Intermarrying daughters and polygamy is not mutually exclusive. In other words, intermarrying daughters does not always mean monogamy. that's only if you completely exchange all the daughters, and that particular social arrangment hasn't been recorded afaik. it's simply suboptimal You just ignore numerous anthropological literature which have recorded polygamurous societies. there are no such societies. those are all instances of "few man have more than one women", which is of course natural bec…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre30/09/19 11:18 AM
1

If It is not unnatural, why most of human societies have been polygamorous? no they haven't. polygamous society cannot defend itself against monogamous society where kinship is known and bands/tribes can form alliances by intermarrying daughters. they have all been wiped from the face of the earth. "fucking many women" is not the same as "polygamy". The widespread of monogamy as a social, legal institution on a global scale is only a recent phenomena. monogamy is literally printed in our DNA. it…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre29/09/19 11:35 PM
5

only face on images = fat
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/09/19 06:38 PM
3

the inability to cook is one of my top five elimination criteria. they all end up being fat later in life
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/09/19 06:34 PM
1

what is racial harmony? aesthetic beauty is arbitrary and thus irrelevant. third reich was just as bad as the soviet union
/r/TheRedPill27/09/19 04:13 PM
2

American women ancestry is mostly from western coast of Africa where fat women are the cultural norm. In Mauritania girls are literally being force-fed to be "big and beautiful". Eastern African women are leaner. The problem with them though is that they're mostly Muslim, so no physical activity and covered had to toe is the norm.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/09/19 09:47 AM
68

One said she'd rather have no options than too many options. Fucking lmao. 15 years later Wish granted!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/09/19 08:49 AM
7

"And stay down"
/r/PussyPassDenied26/09/19 12:41 AM
1

that still doesn't explain why psychopathy has spread so much from the hunter-gatherer times. the answer is simple: for psychopaths it's easy to impregnate and abandon the women, without having second thoughts. it's the same instinct that drives common folks to socialism - milk the resources stolen from others and don't care what happens to everyone else later, even your own children. I'd say 90%+ of the population is on the "spectrum" of psychopathy
/r/TheRedPill25/09/19 11:50 PM
1

We've just gotten smarter and adjusted the scale with time. We haven't gotten smarter, intelligence has remained the same. what has happened with IQ increase is entirely due to environment. IQ is just a measure of intelligence (a not a particularly good one), not the intelligence itself. Anyways, recent studies have shown that Flynn effect is reversing in developed countries, and the reversal is the greatest in low-IQ range.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/09/19 02:07 PM
8

that kid on top of the rock doing a selfie with a burning asteroid hitting the atmosphere would be a more apt comparison to the modern age
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/09/19 11:14 PM
2

goddammit now I need an eye bleach
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/09/19 11:09 PM
1

Why aren't there incel riots though? Are they unfit or just too pacifistic? They are lazy cowards. Unless you won genetic lottery you should be making offerings at the Iron Temple at least three times a week, full-effort, otherwise you don't get to protest that bitches don't want you. Which surprise surprise they don't. Also, I don't consider ISIS anything but a glownigger cell It's a modern form of exterminating the violent and the rebellious of the gene pool, the process that has been going on…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre24/09/19 02:21 PM
1

But general point does stand - young fit men deprived of sexual reproduction throw uprisings. ISIS was largely comprised of such men - a large part of the ISIS appeal was access to women and a fight against the modernity. men feel it on an instinctual level
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre24/09/19 02:09 PM
1

natural selection sends personal greetings bitch
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/09/19 10:18 AM
1

fructose goes through liver and you don't get fat tissue if you're training regularly. I also never blend fruits (except citruses which I also take daily, 2 oranges and a lemon) because it destroys fibers which interferes with digestion
/r/TheRedPill23/09/19 12:02 AM
0

well I tell that to women in their face and they mostly agree
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 02:10 PM
4

I've read that the Arab Springs protests were caused by the conduct of some woman and the discontent of bachelor men had a very big effect on the protest itself. I will add the source when I find it eventually. Mohamed Bouazizi Bouazizi's family claims he was publicly humiliated, that a 45-year-old female municipal official, Faida Hamdi,[2][10][15] slapped him in the face, spat at him, confiscated his electronic weighing scales, and tossed aside his produce cart.[20] It was also stated that she …
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/09/19 11:42 AM
1

load of BS. monogamy is not unnatural, it's perfectly natural extension of the pair-bonding and mate-guarding instincts that were naturally selected for, since at least 1.7 million years ago in times of Homo ergaster. Primates that are naturally polygamous like gorillas exhibit significant physical differences between sexes, homans don't. 99% of men and women can even today only exhibit love towards a single mate, unless they've been corrupted by excessive sexual indulgence (and that includes po…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/09/19 11:08 AM
1

I think you're missing the point. Mate selection is still tied to intelligence. It is but only for high-IQ people. Physicists, mathematicians and engineers are not exactly top of the SMP crop. The Flynn Effect could still be operative on a world-wide scale. No it isn't, it has maxed out. Better schooling, nutrition and cognitive developmeent has diminishing returns, like every other process. That's why it matters knowing whether the reduced IQ is coming from immigration or from mate selection. I…
/r/TheRedPill22/09/19 09:54 AM
1

What difference does it make if they are an ever-diminishing percentage of total human population? Neanderthals were once more widespread than Homo sapiens as well. The problem are high-IQ women which don't reproduce sufficiently. Giving them sexual freedom was a big fucking mistake.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/19 10:03 PM
1

It doesn't matter if the fertility rates of those above the median IQ, and especially those of sigma and above, are below the replacement level. Assortative mating fixes things a little (new studies show that Flynn effect despite regressing for the general population, is still going on for the right part of the bell curve), but overall the future is dysgenic thanks to femlib.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/19 08:59 PM
3

fruits are necessary for vitamins but should be dosed (I eat about 200 grams of mixed fruits per day). yes sugar is sugar, but fruit sugar doesn't fuck you up nearly as much as processed food sugar
/r/TheRedPill21/09/19 11:51 AM
1

Eugenics is all about advancement of intelligence. It is intelligence that is pushing human evolution, since the agriculture was invented. All the other traits have been historically proven to be dysgenic and leading to extinction. Feminism is just one of them.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/19 05:54 PM
4

Women are apologetically eugenic. They get to be because for a small window they're constantly showered in attention. Feminism/femlib was created by Margaret Sanger explicitly as an eugenic project. The irony is that the smartest men and especially women today have the least kids. (Smart man can get money and status, smart but ugly woman is an unfixable fault). Being attracted to someone on the basis of physical attractiveness hasn't been "eugenic" for the last 10,000 years.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/19 01:11 PM
2

Friendzone levels are usually measured in μSloan.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/09/19 11:20 PM
42

This is an example of how women exhibit no loyalty and easily ignore years of personal investment by their partner. All that matters is now, now now. Just like that, in an instant, all the shared experiences that you had and the support you provided could be tossed out of the window for some gina tingles for a neighborhood Chad.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/09/19 11:47 PM
6

The sad reality of the situation is that the young women of today are the children of fools who would rather see their children destroy themselves rather than admit that they were wrong. A concise description of the baby boomer generation.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/09/19 03:23 PM
2

is there a term for that inverse butterfly transformation?
/r/TheRedPill17/09/19 12:04 PM
13

Her answer to most men is, sucks for you, idk what to tell you. Yet here is she is, alone and unwilling to even consider compromising or changing herself. It sucks for her 10x as much. An ugly women is an unfixable defect. Any man, no matter how ugly, can get ripped, earn shitload of money, accrue power, or become a renowned expert in some skill that he was endowed with. It is the choice of our generation to fuck off from the plantation. She has none.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/09/19 11:39 AM
28

If she looks like the model whose picture graces the article she might do it, but chances are that she's fat and frumpy. If she doesn't have her own picture, it means she's fat and/or ugly. Attractive women will never fail to advertise themselves to the prospective alphas on any available medium.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/09/19 11:35 AM
5

revenge is a quite motivating purpose
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/09/19 11:23 PM
15

Exactly. A dozen more encounters like this, and she's 30+, bitter about men, physiologically incapable of pair bonding and redirecting unfulfilled motherly instincts into pets. A story old as time. Bitches think they can do better in the SMP that they deserve, but they end up being a cum dumpster.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/19 03:34 PM
1

Marriage was killed in ancient societies as well not by tech advancements but by men turning into simps allowing women to earn their own money, vote and (surprise, surprise) unleash hypergamy onto the SMP. Read Glubb and Unwin. There was no welfare, great economic surplus or washing mashines back then. It has already happened before. It's the whore instinct from the stone age that men haven't exterminated yet. For extra reading: Malleus Maleficarum, witches = whores.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/19 11:00 PM
1

This what hitting the wall at full speed looks like.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/09/19 07:33 PM
4

QED
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/09/19 01:41 AM
16

Well she said she's a business woman after all.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/09/19 01:38 AM
5

Your strategy doesn't scale to civilization level. Right now in Western countries more than 50% of women of reproductive age are not "settling" and are wasting their eggs, leading to soon total collapse of the society. 10 years from now, when you're old, wrinkled and post-Wall your man should, following the same strategy, dump you and find himself 20-something woman because he would be settling for less were he to stay loyal. I don't expect you to understand or relate to any of this.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/09/19 01:32 AM
4

was a single mom for about 8 years until I finally met someone that was perfect for me. I am so glad I waited, my line of thinking was I was better off single forever than I would have been with someone I didn't feel anything for. "It worked for me so everyone should do the same". Femlogic 101
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/09/19 01:03 AM
13

What I love is that these broads don't understand it's not them who are settling, it's the man who would have to wife this thing. Women never get to really choose. In their 20s its the alphas having their pick of the sluts, and in the 30s it's the well-off late booming betas. Men are the one's who always "settle" when they go LTR or marry, because in the natural environment that the feminist society is regressing to, such men would have several woman at their disposal.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/09/19 12:57 AM
4

In the end she talks about how you shouldn't worry about the small things and that there is no "perfect one". She should pass that timeless advice to her granddaughters so that they don't repeat the same mistake. Oh wait..
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/19 02:43 PM
2

it's funny how in their 20s women are desperate to get laid by Chads, and in the 30s and 40s by well-off betas. in both cases they don't really have the choice, it's the men that they want that are doing picking and choosing.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/09/19 11:59 AM
-1

I don't hate women, I just see them as lesser being than a man. dumber, weaker, like children in grown-up bodies who ruin their lives without parental/social supervision. inferior to man in every respect
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/19 10:30 AM
83

just reading these stories my dick shrinks back into my body
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/19 10:25 AM
4

/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen/
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/19 10:23 AM
1

LOL you are either a woman or a blue-pilled simp. Register a dating app account with the most hideous women you can find image of and observe. Try putting a transvestite as well. You'd still get more matches than 80% of average blokes.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/19 01:07 PM
4

the beta invisibility cloak doesn't turn off until hamster hits the wall head-on in full speed, it's common knowledge man
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/09/19 12:13 AM
1

if today a bitch tried to shame me to enlist into some stupid war I'd punch her in the face. the government can suck dick as well
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/09/19 12:00 AM
309

All right boys, which one of you is going to man up and marry this delicate flower? Please form an orderly queue so that she can take her pick.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/09/19 01:12 PM
7

Well I agree somewhat but the kid is still grandkid. By making an example of the grandkid you disincentive that kind of behavior in the future. Yeah it's not the kid's fault, but such is life. Some principles are more important than kin because they affect the basis on which the civilized society is formed.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/19 09:34 AM
4

yes my grandma was like that. she couldn't stand being a parasite and not doing anything. she worked on her small farm two weeks until she died of old age, and the only reason why she stopped was because she became bedridden and was physically incapable of it. she never took vacation and owned no excessive luxury. her two daughters were semi-parasites, and her granddaughters are all either gold-diggers or parasitic trash. it's unbelievable how things change fast
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/09/19 09:04 AM
10

For those of you leaving nasty comments about my choosing to have a baby with a guy who didn’t want kids, well he told me he did. I also was told by my doctor I couldn’t get pregnant without hormones so our daughter was a surprise. Let me get this straight: the guy who wanted a kid nutted in a woman who couldn't get pregnant and then left when she actually got pregnant? Nah, everything is perfectly consistent /s
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/09/19 10:20 PM
13

crickets
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/09/19 10:16 PM
13

just reading that thread is a huge red pill or the normies suddenly the age-old tradition of the punishment of death for cheating women doesn't seem so radical and out of time, does it?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/09/19 07:35 PM
2

In China short women are plainly said exactly that
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/09/19 09:11 AM
4

They flushed it out in Weimer Germany which was a spectacle of sexual debauchery before Nazis came to power. The same ((group)) is driving all the globohomo femlib miscagenation agenda. Corporations, women and weak men support it all because they profit (or they think they profit) from it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/09/19 08:57 AM
31

The world wants to be deceived, so let it be deceived Originally referring to religion, but also applicable to other obvious falsehoods. Selling lies has been a profitable activity ever since the first shaman claimed to have a hotline with the god almighty. Human mind (woman's especially so) seems to have an inborn susceptibility to be fed comfortable lies that make reality a lot more palatable. That's why believing in lies and self-delusion ("I am a good person", "I don't deserve this" etc) usu…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/09/19 08:35 AM
9

those sex dolls or robots don't even have to be "real", they just have to be "real enough", so that you can cum. personally I think it's gonna be a mixture of tactile replication + virtual reality rather than a complete visual replication of a woman.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/09/19 08:25 AM
38

The challenge is greatest for high-achieving women in their 30s looking for equally successful men. Analysis of 2006 census figures by the Monash University sociologist, Genevieve Heard, reveals that almost one in four of degree-educated women in their 30s will miss out on a man of similar age and educational achievement. I like it how they present having a degree as a "high achievement" for women. No cunt, having a degree in lesbian studies does not mean you deserve a 6'2 guy with a PhD and a s…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/09/19 06:48 AM
30

I like this translation from the hoespeak.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/09/19 09:15 PM
1

Is there anything of promise (visible works) where things REALLY matter? NO. Everywhere I have looked is just another pile of garbage that can't be cleaned up as fast as it is made. There is nothing new under the sun. All is vanity.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/19 09:06 PM
0

just google it, you even have a wikipedia article. monogamy is genetic for humans. lifetime monogamy however is an evolved social institution (marriage, dowry etc.) with feedback into the genetics (killing of adulterous women, lack of marriage prospects for promiscuous women etc.)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/09/19 09:01 PM
1

actually if history has shown everything, it's that the collapse arrives rapidly. yes the small things that you describe occur at a snail's pace, but big SHTF moments will occur as well such as market collapses that cannot be fixed with money printing, and which will send the economy into a tail spin. anything not on rock-solid foundations will die. two missing salaries is all that it takes to turn majority of the populace into animals
/r/TheRedPill08/09/19 06:48 PM
61

that's why I keep telling men to put a trojan horse on every digital device of your LTR/wife. these bitches aren't loyal and you need to sniff that shit out early on, otherwise you're gonna waste a lot of time and resources (you lost 4 years). you need to be your own intelligence agency
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/09/19 04:18 PM
13

It's kind of beautiful really. Across the world in various countries feminism empirically proves itself as a fertility-negative strategy, driving its own extinction. And the cohort of women with the least children are those with the highest IQ, education and career ambition, and with the biggest delusions on their SMP value.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre08/09/19 11:05 AM
4

I don't see a ring on my finger
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/09/19 12:25 PM
28

prostitutes are the most honest women gold diggers are just a few notches below
/r/TheRedPill07/09/19 12:02 PM
1

because of the public outrage
/r/TheRedPill07/09/19 10:26 AM
2

they've only used in the scenarios I described, trivial modifications and even those have had unforeseen consequences. polygenic traits that are most interesting (height, IQ, behavior etc.) are impossible to "engineer" that way. once monster babies start getting born the practice will be killed lol. we can't even engineer organisms that are 100x less complex than human DNA that way. simple traits that are either "on" or "off" are an entirely different category. for humans we already have embryo …
/r/TheRedPill07/09/19 10:21 AM
3

Chromosome picking. Take the "best" 23 chromosomes from each parent and make a baby using those. As far as I can tell we have the technology to do this now. Since it's not editing the chromosomes not even sure there is an ethical problem to it. Currently the best tech only does embryo screening for IVF (search: Genomic Prediction). I suspect that in the near future all the rich will make babies via IVF and select for high IQ, height etc, and lowly peasants will reproduce "naturally". In the futu…
/r/TheRedPill06/09/19 09:40 PM
7

and when AI algos screw your polygenic traits and give your child some disorder, who's gonna cover for that? only 100% clinically tested modifications will be allowed, which means that only absolutely trivial modifications, usually against some hereditary illnesses, will ever be approved
/r/TheRedPill06/09/19 09:32 PM
4

Robots will be to expensive anyways for the next several decades. If you rent them they won't. Brothels with sex robots that are better looking than any woman and which could recreate the experience to the extent that you can ejaculate is all that is needed to crush the price of pussy.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/19 09:25 PM
1

few dozen generations is enough to entirely reprogram any behavior, even physical features, just look at selective breeding in agriculture and with dogs, chicken etc. human evolution is also driven by culture (gene-culture coevolution), and marriage is the focal point of civilization. without it, we regress to stone-age mating strategies exhibited by modern women, which eventually ruin the civilization that allowed it and let it be replaced by a more evolved civilization that curbs it
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/09/19 07:49 PM
2

huge difference there, the entire concept of monogramy and marriage and equality goes against the majority of human history. marriage was an evolved social institution. monogamous coupling however is older than our species, at least since homo ergaster 1.5 million years ago.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/09/19 07:28 PM
3

a family-oriented, marriage-seeking, socially-awkward virgin lmao you really think she's a fucking marriage-seeking virgin?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/09/19 07:11 PM
2

Yeah some of those 40-year olds who work out and take care of their skin look better than many late 20s party hoes who smoke and eat crap
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/09/19 10:45 AM
1

logic is a sexist relic of the patriarchy
/r/PussyPassDenied06/09/19 12:12 AM
6

Someone should make a business for saving/reviving marriage by instilling dread into wives. It would do wonders. Hire some HB6+ to flirt, make random calls, make the hubby experience the "situational alpha" in social settings with wife present etc.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/19 11:02 PM
47

Teaching them wouldn't change anything. The slut instinct is genetic, it evolved for a purpose and it's baked into the woman's DNA. They would still spend their youth riding cocks in rotation. The appeal of the alpha cock and their conscious or subconscious fantasy of impregnating them trumps everything. They don't give a shit about commitment when everything is handed to them on a plate while they are hot and young. You can't fight nature with giving them an "educated" choice. Women's narcissis…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/09/19 01:59 PM
5

why? she didn't feel sorry for shitting on 80%+ of men in her teens and 20s. she's a selfish, stupid child that deserves to be laughed at
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/09/19 01:36 PM
4

I just checked, she isn't married and doesn't have children.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/09/19 01:31 PM
58

I think this is the far bigger factor in the relationship marketplace than women hitting the wall. Women in the 30s want men their age or older, but men in the 30s can hit on anything 16+. They hold all the cards and don't want to put up with artificial barriers erected by 30+ harridans suddenly wanting to settle down and take things the slow way. If anything, older women should giving up their pussy on the first date in order to trap men, not acting like prudes. It's just fucking retarded.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/09/19 12:32 PM
1

the reality is more like 50 million instead of a billion, but it doesn't matter. the order of magnitude is similar. the effective contribution is effectively zero because mongols didn't establish long-living inbred bloodlines like European aristocrats
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/09/19 05:03 PM
3

I was gonna write this exact thing. women being crazy is not a bug, it's a feature. they evolved to be like hypergamous with dual mating strategy and attracted to scum. and men in our ancient past are mostly responsible for it because they bred them to be whores while raping and plundering, and they evolved manipulation, lying, cuckolding, both serial monogamy and fucking 10 men at a time, to protect themselves. since civilization started whores have been being bred out of gene pool though socia…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/09/19 02:19 AM
1

go back 30 generations, each human had 1 billion ancestors (assuming no overlap). that number of "descendants" is quite irrelevant, the actual genetic contribution is GK to any living human is effectively zero.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/09/19 02:12 AM
6

Whare are all the good single 30+ ladies? They left with all the good men. I'll show myself out..
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/09/19 01:09 AM
2

Cops and DA won't consider it at all... Not even to charge her with perjury. They literally said they don't care and their only goal is to prove I did what she claimed initially. and then someone says that I should care about the demise of the Western civilization lmao. let it all burn. open the borders and lets get this shit over with
/r/TheRedPill01/09/19 03:13 PM
3

but the thing is men and women both hoe around, but it’s not the majority in either population 80% of women fuck 20% of men. the current generation has the least sex of any other, but only for men. enough with thes false generalizations
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/09/19 12:25 AM
4

Think Boeing, and the cluster fuck when they got rid of their engineers and out soursed they IT to india. The Boeing crashes are the female equivalent of hitting the wall. The company had it so good for such a long time (government contracts, managers squeezing profits and bonuses by outsourcing), that it thought it can get away with just about anything from its workforce. When it came crashing down (pun intended), here comes hamstering and the inability to realize that after now, things are nev…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre31/08/19 09:26 AM
3

Weak men betrayed the privileges and rights they inherited. those same weak men are getting screwed the most in the current sexual market. as are the career-oriented women in the marriage market. good riddance to both of them
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre31/08/19 01:27 AM
1

Pairbonding is bro science. It has been in fact scientifically proven. The more premartal sex partners, the more chance of a divorce. Why do all these virgin girls cheat then if pairbonding is so strong? This statement is an example of broscience.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/08/19 07:41 PM
3

the thing is, women like her don't even consider men who can't have sex at will as men. to them, such men are invisible. hence the entire WAATGM thing. they only see the top 10-20% alphas willing to cheat and having access to easy sex when they say "men cheat just as much". their brain simply cannot fathom any other reality than being with such alphas
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/08/19 07:34 PM
1

That's not a good model to emulate. it was until a few generations ago, when the vast majority of men worked physical jobs and were thus naturally "alphas". now we need another model, but being a strong high-T mutherfucker is a step one, hence why the very first TRP advice is: go lift.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/08/19 01:18 PM
3

I went into this feeling confident in who I am and secure in myself. I had the best of intentions, not wanting to hurt anyone, neither him, nor myself. And he’s left me hurt, dispirited, and wanting to absolutely crawl back into myself again. Never in my life have I ever felt so worthless. I feel like a fucking shell of a human being. This is why women were married of as virgins at a young age. Because they are fucking stupid, and left to their devices, they get played, lose the ability to pairb…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/08/19 12:50 PM
8

Women are not marrying because they don't have to; they're way too picky; and they aren't trying. Women don't start trying until they absolutely have to. Hear, hear. The only reason why religious cults have had explosive demographics is because of arranged marriages, and extreme social pressure to marry very young. Their brothers and fathers would vet the prospective suitors, and after a few babies were on the way she would eventually develop "love" for her husband (who was mostly away from the …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/08/19 09:29 AM
20

they would rather share a Chad than get stuck with betafag Billy
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/08/19 09:20 AM
5

single moms and their "chads" should be sterilized, their kids taken away to institutions or for adoption
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/08/19 06:56 PM
1

Are you suggesting that the rest of the 13 children she bore where not his? As for her adultery, it all comes from non-primary sources so it's far from certain
/r/TheRedPill26/08/19 09:37 AM
14

"I will see you again. But not yet, not yet."
/r/TheRedPill25/08/19 11:33 PM
1

There is a need they have to unleash chaos, and then sit in the middle of it, unable to solve it. And that will burn you as hell. it's a need to make men compete against each other, so that they can see who's the best and than they can fuck him
/r/TheRedPill25/08/19 12:12 PM
-4

Well I just fucked my 21yo baby sitter (I'm 33)... she has a bf back in germany. Such a cutie, so much fun on all fours :) You know, in some other times guys like you would be having their heads chopped off.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/19 09:58 AM
6

Monogamy is unnatural. And that does not make it a bad thing. Civilization is also unnatural. Do you know what other things are natural? Rape, cannibalism, the law of strength and dying of curable illnesses. Would it be OK if I crush your skull with a rock while you're asleep, rape and impregnate your daughter, kill your male children and your wife? Because that's the future where we're going towards with this whole "natural" logic. Monogamy is the optimal social arrangement for sustaining civil…
/r/TheRedPill25/08/19 09:55 AM
1

lmao. for my advice you can always claim plausible deniability, for yours - not so much
/r/TheRedPill25/08/19 08:21 AM
1

Pretty much. Historically, labor has accounted for about 2/3 of production and capital 1/3. That ratio held pretty firm from pre-industrial times all the way up to a few decades ago. Now labor’s share of production is in free fall. [citation needed]
/r/TheRedPill23/08/19 04:04 PM
8

Step 1: Automate your job without telling your company. Make sure there is a dead-man switch on the automation or that you have to login and press a button. also: make sure you document your job as little as possible. if you write code or automate a lot of your work - keep your company code without comments, and automation scripts private. make sure that the code has some bugs that require periodic "interventions" that can be easily done, but only if you know what you're doing. add dependencies …
/r/TheRedPill23/08/19 03:53 PM
1

there is nothing you can do to fight the system. you can only help yourself personally by not letting the system take an advantage of you, and/or by taking advantage of others using the system
/r/TheRedPill23/08/19 02:20 PM
2

when you figure out how the system works - the lying manipulative hypergamous bitches that the women are; the media brainwashing and propaganda in the service of the military-industrial complex, the globohomo and cultural marxists; the amount of wealth stolen through taxation and the fiat money scam; the poisonous crap that is being sold as food and drinks; the election system based on bribing the electorate from the public purse; the stupidity of average Joe who thinks you're crazy if you menti…
/r/TheRedPill23/08/19 02:02 PM
3

Explanations come from a woman (Jean Twenge), who is biologically incapable of self-reflection with respect to women's own sexual strategy. Men who don't have sex in reality (the below top 20%) simply don't exist for women. For them, men who don't have sex according to study results is some subcategory of fuckable alphas that simply decide to focus on their careers or opt for abstinence for some higher purpose. Hence the dumb explanations.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/19 11:30 PM
16

or even better, index the upvote count by the number of subscribers at the time the post was made. if that kind of info is available, that is.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/19 11:15 PM
2

there is not enough options for all men because women will rather share top 20% men than touch the bottom 80%. that's why monogamous marriage was the optimal social arrangement. it's the stability point for the society. without it you have first sub-replacement fertility rates, then half of men population gets starved for sex and childless men don't have an interest in the future of society, and then you have war and lots of dead "alphas".
/r/TheRedPill21/08/19 08:02 AM
1

why is that crazy? women have had no reproductive choice until men gave them. they relied on lies and manipulation and paternity fraud, and when that was curbed with virginity demands and arranged marriages, they were nothing but baby factories. and they were having much happier and fulfilling lives. it's a win-win situation for all parties concerned.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/19 07:52 AM
1

all that happened just one or two generations ago, depending on the country. all that it takes is for men to decide to do it. countless societies already failed by letting women's hypergamous nature go wild, we can easily break the loop. if the top 20% men will it, the rest of the men will follow along, and women will have no choice but to obey
/r/TheRedPill21/08/19 07:50 AM
-27

they can't learn it or understand it on their own. it goes gainst hypergamy. the only way it can happen is to strip them of the right to choose, and force monogamous coupling down their throats.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/19 09:55 AM
1

especially when 90% of what you're spewing doesn't even check out at the most basic levels in my own daily life. I'm "spewing" facts. numbers that are rooted in reality. I don't care about your retarded opinions and wishful thinking. your beliefs that women contribute anything economically in relative terms is just that - a belief. studies have shown that they are in fact parasites, and that they do stupid jobs with worthless degrees, that they always vote like communists that they biologically …
/r/TheRedPill10/08/19 11:16 AM
1

you don't have any real arguments so you resort to ad hominem attacks, pathetic
/r/TheRedPill09/08/19 06:10 PM
1

That aside, under-education in women is a huge driver of poverty in the world. The so-called "shitholes" you mentioned exist because of that, and numerous other reasons, like corruption. corruption is not the reason why a society is backwards. corrpution reflects distrust in social institutions such as the rule of law, distrust into state officials, in general into anyone outside their own immediate kin/tribe/ethnoreligious group. corruption is a normal state of affairs in societies, because it …
/r/TheRedPill09/08/19 11:31 AM
1

Emirates are artificial nations, built on oil profits and slavery. They will implode the instant the oil money runs dry. it's not something you'll find a wealth of in almost any country that restricts its women in the way you favor. Western educational institutions were established centuries before women had any rights. women had no contribution to the enlightenment and industrial revolution. them being "educated" is just a waste of resources since men like you are dumb enough to think that wome…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/19 07:02 PM
1

Anyway, you picked a nice paper, but it's ironic that you picked a paper by a man who served so faithfully in a society which, at the time at least, at a phase predating women's rights and even the rights of foreigners. that book was published in 1965, femlib already happened for three generations at that point. white feathers, temperance movement, age of consent..they didn't have WAVA, imprisonment for not paying child support and the presumption of guilt, but everything else was set in motion,…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/19 05:59 PM
1

I see RP more as a personal armor, the set of skills you acquire to defend yourself against exploitation by the gynocracy, the state and other men. It can't solve societal issue because it wasn't meant to scale to that level. Not all men are even capable of red-pilling, especially not after a lifetime of brainwashing and conditioning. Hypergamy isn't the cause because it always existed, but only now at the end of civilization has it been unleashed. Read Glubb's Fate of Empires - the same shit ha…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/19 10:50 AM
1

yes, we escaped the Malthusian trap and there is no more natural selection. there is only a sexual selection, but without extensive intaspecies pressures (no more wars, continual decline of interpersonal violence etc.) it turns dysgenic (the poor and dumb tend to reproduce more because they are subject to more pressures, and it pays to do so) and fertility-negative (most women of reproductive age in the West don't have children currently). it's an era of prosperity, but just before a big fall, l…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/19 10:55 PM
2

and if the friends' and society's reaction is not positive to her infidelity, the story suddenly turns to: "he made me do it" "it was a rape" "i was taken advantage of"
/r/TheRedPill07/08/19 02:06 PM
1

Women are selectors, not caretakers. They need to exclude the weak men and only interact with the winners. only if men let them. that's why women used to be married young by their fathers and brothers, with them having almost no say in the matter. and it worked. now they have "freedom" and western civilization is going the way of the dodo
/r/TheRedPill07/08/19 01:52 PM
4

Don't ask a women anything, she'll only tell you what she believes you want to hear or what is best for the image of women in general: the so called halo effect. nah, they truly believe the shit they, and behave completely opposite. it's evolutionarily beneficial for women not to understand their mating strategy
/r/TheRedPill07/08/19 01:39 PM
3

"I am finding myself attracted" - straight from the horse's mouth. women have no sense of agency, they are just leaves on the wind. environment entirely shapes them, to the extent that their instincts allow them
/r/TheRedPill07/08/19 01:38 PM
3

career thots do it all the was to late 30s if they take care of their body. it's only until their face starts wrinkling that men stop noticing them that they start to panic. by then it's too late, because no one wants their rotten ovaries
/r/TheRedPill07/08/19 01:25 PM
4

it's pretty obvious, isn't it? bulk at winter, cut at summer, enjoy the best of both worlds
/r/TheRedPill05/08/19 05:12 PM
1

you didn't make and points, just incoherent ramblings on hatred. that though process is typical of women. they are unable to think logically and make arguments that run against biological programming. lower life forms, indeed
/r/TheRedPill04/08/19 09:11 PM
0

I don't "hate2 women, at least not inasmuch as I "hate" the bacteria in my guts. you live with them, tolerate them, grow them, but in the end you either flush their byproducts down the toilet, or you use them to feed you energy. hatred is the emotion of a weak, the irrational pathetic brainwashed soyboys likes yourself. no man true to himself thinks of women as nothing else as children in the bodies of a grown-up. now that you mention such emotions repeatedly, I'm starting to think that you're a…
/r/TheRedPill04/08/19 08:02 PM
2

women (and in general all life forms except men) are irrational because nature evolved them to be as such. hardwiring emotional decisions leading to reproductive success is advantageous to random decision making. nature is also misogynstic to human females because they have no other useful purpose other than being baby factories. they are weak, cognitively inferior, unable to innovate, self-reflect, support themselves, and come equipped with a plethora of built-in biases that wreak havoc upon so…
/r/TheRedPill04/08/19 04:21 PM
2

nature is misogynistic and irrational, who are you to bend natural laws to you ideology?
/r/TheRedPill04/08/19 10:22 AM
2

they can make decisions today - to choose their mate. and they are mostly choosing wrong. what I'm saying is that it's better for the future of our species to eliminate such women from the gene pool sooner rather than later. curtailing their choices (like it's done in patriarchal societies) is a solution of course, but all it takes is another wave of femlib to unleash the beast within. let them die childless and bitter
/r/TheRedPill03/08/19 02:04 PM
5

I think women are suffering a lot. They are the prime victims of social and emotional predators which make a lot of money out of their misery. Which in turn makes men miserable as well. victims? they brought it on themselves. it's susceptibility to unrealistic expectations and media propaganda that has rendered them incapable of pair bonding. that susceptibility is mostly genetic, partially environmental. it's only now, for the first time in history, that they can suffer the consequences. the ne…
/r/TheRedPill03/08/19 01:50 PM
1

Its not incredible. Thats how a women's mind works, and it works that way because its the best way to have many strong babies, and to continue with the human race. Yes, thats right, if women weren't solipsistic bitches, we would have extinguished long ago. That hasn't been the case since about 10k years ago when agriculture was invented. even before in tribal hunter-gatherer bands women never really had reproductive choice, they gave up pussy easily and cucked beta men as much as they could, lik…
/r/TheRedPill03/08/19 01:41 PM
3

But how do they write women so well??
/r/TheRedPill01/08/19 02:13 PM
2

Remember guys, don't stick your dick in crazy!
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/19 01:01 PM
3

What's in it for me? Nothing. I am not doing it. there is nothing wrong with enlightened self-interest. the problem is that with that thinking you'll get fucked in modern society where group-level strategy is easily capable of coercing any other individual. you have to organize and be a part of something that best aligns with your ideological viewpoints, otherwise you're going to get crushed
/r/TheRedPill31/07/19 10:04 AM
2

How can anyone be this retarded?
/r/TheRedPill31/07/19 09:54 AM
2

no benefits for lifters as well
/r/TheRedPill24/07/19 09:16 PM
4

These are not facts, these are speculations stated beside facts in a way that makes them appear connected, despite being completely arbitrary and mostly opinions. White population is declining percentage wise, how is that not a fact. Are you fucking retarded? Correct, if this is allowed it will continue, as it does in countries like Russia or Saudi Arabia where the segregation is state-sponsored (Russia: Gay people, Saudi Arabia: Women). But this is not being allowed to continue in the overwhelm…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/19 11:54 AM
8

Facts are facts, not irrelevant and unnecessary.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/19 10:32 AM
14

One of the less known TRP adages: "If she's not chasing you, you're wasting your time." Chasing also encompasses IOIs. Just improve yourself and slay women who indicate interest, it's that simple.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/19 12:41 PM
5

You stated that "most" women are whores" without any proof to back that up. LMAO get the fuck out of this subreddit.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/19 08:16 PM
2

Women were nothing but gatherers and baby factories for the majority of this species' existence. It's not alienation, it's returning to their natural condition. What specific statement do you need references for?
/r/TheRedPill09/07/19 12:35 PM
2

those are all facts corroborated by studies
/r/TheRedPill09/07/19 09:50 AM
1

Intensity is the percentage (relative to your one rep max ) of weight used , what you’re thinking off is rate of perceived exertion (rpe). You need high or medium volume at a decent intensity, not rpe . I can do a set of empty barbel curls with a 100+ reps at rpe 10 , that’s not high intensity. Rpe is irrelevant in the context that you’re using it in , Longer rest periods allow for greater volume at higher intensity , doing 100 rep sets of curls will burn like a motherfucker but good luck growin…
/r/TheRedPill04/07/19 06:26 PM
0

But Bodybuilding form is to optimize tearing your pecs despite no intensity while powerlifters are doing insane grinders reps everyday and still don’t get injured. Shit form . But sure it does let you move more weight. Nonsense, bodybuilding training is by definition high on intensity. You want to lower the rest time between sets, and keep muscle tension constant in the 60-90s range for optimal hypertrophy. Bench press and squat are both much harder when doing the bodybuilding way - without lock…
/r/TheRedPill04/07/19 01:23 PM
0

Benching 315 with perfect powerlifting form is way easier than benching 315 with the bro form , flat back no tightness losing power everywhere , no leg drive shit bar path exhaling like a retard when the bar is on your chest etc Bodybuilding form in bench press is to optimize muscle hypertrophy. You are not "stronger" just because you can lift more weight in a single rep by having leg drive, arching your back and training your CNS and muscle coordination to do a specific movement.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/19 12:08 PM
0

if that were the case they'd be better in creativity which they are not. men are better in every imaginable cognitive metric
/r/TheRedPill03/07/19 10:58 PM
2

I had a college from UK that is making less money then me (I am from the country) and the women nearly kneeled infront of him in many occasions just because of his accent. They had no clue I have more money, better asssets and shit, his superiority by being foreign was laughable. that's just the novelty trick. EE girls will quickly squeeze out the info on your net worth, and when they realize what you are you will be promptly dumped and the word will spread
/r/TheRedPill03/07/19 09:20 PM
3

most EE women are just materialistic whores, very little substance beneath the looks
/r/TheRedPill03/07/19 09:04 PM
3

Yeah grow some balls and approach women in public
/r/TheRedPill03/07/19 09:02 PM
1

In a social setting it's completely different. Face-ugly but strong and/or powerful man that exudes confidence will take any women 10 out of 10 times from a weak pretty-face boy who will probably shit his pants just by looking at him.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/19 08:26 PM
3

that's impossible to prove but makes logical sense. that most women are whores is an observable fact, with whoredom and absence of mate loyalty being a genetically transmittable behavior, as is the fact that twice as many women reproduced than men, and in many cases that we have the genetics evidence (such as the Yamnaya spread) almost all men were killed and most women were absorbed by the conquerors.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/19 03:31 PM
3

There needs to be a balance. this is crucial. the picture is not black or white folks. personally I prefer short sprints (100 meters or less) in a HIIT scenario, incline treadmill fast walking, high-level elliptical or the stairmaster. I abhor running in general because of the pressure it exerts on your knees and foot once you gain any sizeable muscle mass - your joints are simply not built to withstand that kind of pressure in the long run. so I build cardio other way.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/19 12:41 PM
1

HIIT is great, any program is fine. I recommend the 17 minutes program as outlined in this paper. Long-distance running is retarded though. Have you seen how those runners look like? Thanks but no thanks.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/19 12:31 PM
1

Balance is a subcategory of stability. I think the closest you can get to balance in physics is metastability. It's the other way around. Calm sea is stable. Balanced sea level can encompass oscillations from ebb to tide, from droughts to tsunamis. If you kill a billion people because of a looming climate disaster due to overpopulation, that wouldn't keep the population levels stable at all, but it would provide a balance in the big picture. Balance is all about the big picture, whereas stabilit…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/19 10:47 AM
1

Again, stop getting pissy. You were the one droning about consequences. The consequences of your dumbness is that I won't fight your idiocy, and I'll let it destroy you eventually. Are you going to destroy me, or your two-digit IQ peasants with ptichforks high on HFCS, porn and ZOG media propaganda? Says the guy who said stability is bad, evolution is ever changing and there is bo balance. Stability and balance are not the same thing. Dynamical systems are governed by differential equations that…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 10:56 PM
0

Actually yes I could, but my words are clearly wasted on you. You're at the top of the first Dunnings Kruger slope, and you love it. Do you throw a tantrum when you're defeated in a real-world discussion? High-pitched screaming and limbs flailing uncontrollably, before someone slaps you like a little bitch? Says the guy who cares about nobody but himself. You really are delusional. I care about the balance. I don't mind killing a billion people if need be.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 10:21 PM
0

You couldn't debunk jack shit, I'm 10 times smarter than you. I track that sub out of curiosity, keep your enemies closer and all that, so that I don't end up on gallows like myopic self-centered retards such as yourself.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 10:14 PM
0

*You're. Also, no I am not. It's a no-brainer that things you do, or fail to do can have indirect consequences on you. I don't know what you disagree with. That things can have indirect consequences? We live in a stochastic universe. It's impossible to predict the future. There are no direct consequences individual-wise. Every apparently individual decision is just a tipping point of an overwhelming historical trend that has been set long ago. What you are saying is that you want to jump from on…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 05:12 PM
1

My point is that it's IN YOUR BEST INTEREST to take certain duties that don't directly affect you, because they can have indirect co sequences on the long run. No they can't. Your making baseless speculations. The world is big place, societies rise and fall all the time, I don't plan to stick around sifting through the wreckage. Now you say this. But when faced with the gallow, most people start begging for a second chance. Most people deserve gallows. Everyone gets their due in the end. Maybe i…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 11:36 AM
1

You might SAY you are not responsible - you can lie to yourself all you want - but you were in a situation where you made a decision not to do something, and that decision had an outcome. You are responsible, even if you aren't legally culpable. And who knows - maybe that decision will bite you in the ass later on. Absolutely anything I do or don't to can have consequences, be it something you described in a far-fetched scenario, or something trivial everyday stuff. But it is not my duty to do s…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/19 08:24 PM
1

You only have to take responsibility for yourself, and the things you do that affects others. E.g. your kids, bitch you impregnated, liberties that you've violated and so on. Optimal group evolution rests on optimal individual evolution, and the latter requires absolute freedom of association, consuming your own labor's work and focusing your energy to the things you deem fit. Like-minded individuals will self-organize inevitably, like on this forum, communities will form and disband, be it on I…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/19 06:55 PM
0

Not only that - the people who WERE aware of the looming dictatorship would be the victims of other people's idiocy too. That is no longer the case. We have the internet and relatively open borders. I fled my former country which oppressed me through ridiculous taxes on labor, the likes of which would spark an armed revolution in the US. You can buy citizenship of dozens of countries for $10k-$100k. The days of "dictatorships" are long gone. Is it fair that everyone loses, because some people di…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/19 05:03 PM
1

it's all pointless, why bother at all. I might just kill myself this very instant. your logic is absurd
/r/TheRedPill24/06/19 04:49 PM
-2

If the vast majority of the people are dumb enough to have themselves so easily "indoctrinated" as you say, against their own interest, than they deserve everything they get and their former identity and worldview is nothing more than a result of some previous indoctrination. They were pawns before, they remain pawns now. The problem is that the people in power have an uncanny ability to STAY in power, regardless of continent. Elites come and go. There was the priest class, there was the warrior…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/19 12:55 PM
7

LOL I just realized that the OP is a woman. And I wondered why the post sounded so dumb.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/19 11:52 AM
1

Our ancestors needed wars, rituals and peer pressure to cultivate their masculine traits. It was a necessity for the survival of the tribe or nation. In this day and age there are no great wars, and what is needed is awareness, determination and discipline. Those weak-willed men who fail to harness their potential will be left in the dust. In a way, it's a fate that they deserve. I see it as an evolutionary step for men - just like post-wall childless hoes being eliminated from the gene pool is …
/r/TheRedPill24/06/19 11:48 AM
1

And then you get people like the ones leading the European Union - all of them are VEHEMENTLY hegemonists. Example: https://youtu.be/-xg7JwbJfWA The same sentiment can be heard from other leading EU members. Dude, that's the literal tenet of the EU, the so-called "ever-closer union". The two primary mechanisms of it are making binding decisions whose effects will be felt much later in the future, and by then it will be too late to undo them (e.g. the introduction of Euro), and blaming any crises…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/19 11:39 AM
8

It doesn't really. It enables the dumb countries to hit rock bottom faster, and also keeps the most capable and intelligent segments of population free of consequences of the old retards by emigrating. My former country is in the same mess, I don't give two fucks what happens to it. I ain't never gonna be paying again two thirds of my income to any government via taxes, and receive jack shit in return.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/19 01:53 PM
33

The EU will cause the end of Europe as we know it. Look at Greece right now and Spain to a lesser extent. Developed nations going down the toilet. This is not the EU's fault, those countries did it to themselves with socialist economic policies, living on debt and open borders. EU is simply holding them accountable and enabling smart people to escape across the border.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/19 01:28 PM
5

So stem people make technology. Sales people sell it. People who understand both get rich. as an engineer, it's really easy for me to see companies which appear to be just fine income-wise, and yet are about to go bust and they don't even know it. they usually use obsolete tech stacks, underpay they devs which come and go in absurd turnover rates, and have three times as many sales people than engineers. in the end sales is just a scam which works until it doesn't. I think in the very near futur…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/19 01:20 PM
1

"I", "me", "myself", "my own" is every other word lmao. And her "biggest dream" is having family. Her hamster must be running hard.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/19 11:59 AM
1

longer period of education and careers postpone motherhood, often even causing women to price themselves out completely from the sexual market. In the West more than half of all women of reproductive age haven't had kids. Personally I see at as an evolutionary filter (see posts in history).
/r/TheRedPill05/06/19 04:36 PM
2

Jim is not "cucked" he is empowered by his wife. She unshackled him from his flaws which were holding him down all these years. Yes, he's not in the lead. But at least until now, the one in lead seems to have nothing but Jim's best in her mind. No, he's cucked. Slave for the tax and gyno plantation. His "unleashed potential" measures in the amount of money he can produce for her and her child. If a better option came along, such as a richer guy that didn't have to slave away, Jim would be droppe…
/r/TheRedPill02/06/19 03:49 PM
1

A good slave for the gynoplantation.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/19 03:44 PM
2

Her options are actually very simple. Find a guy who is between a 4-6 and accept that Chris Hemsworth is probably not going to sweep her off her feet. it's too late now, the process broke her (alpha-widowed, no ability to reflect and learn from mistakes in the past). Now it's existential anxiety until she's too late to reproduce and can finally come to terms with her lack of purpose.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/19 11:25 AM
4

yup, so many red flags in the text, like it's a CCP congress
/r/TheRedPill23/05/19 11:23 AM
1

To find someone you connect with when you don’t hate being alone is hard. To find that person and also have all the practicalities of starting a life together — their age, location, desire for children — match up just right so it can all come together in a few short years, is miracle-making. TIL billions of people across millennia were magicians.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/19 11:15 AM
2

In a few years we won’t be able to have children, at least not naturally. This has always been a distant reality, a problem saved for later. Solipsistic, materialistic dick-hungry hoes eliminated from the gene pool in one fell swoop. it's beautiful, really.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/19 11:12 AM
3

From a genetic perspective "you" don't exist. That grand-grand-grand-grand child of yours has 3% of your genes. It will have 97% of genes from 31- other persons, completely genetically unrelated to you. "relatedness" is just an arbitrary measure - I'm more related to chimpanzees and Neanderthals than to my distant human ancestors 10+ generations ago.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/19 02:33 PM
3

Your "genetic legacy" will get completely diluted in a few generations - withing five or more your descendants could have more neanderthal DNA than yours. Genes mix freely and don't give a shit. Each of us has point something percent of a shitload of famous historical people. What matters is present, you as an individual, what you accomplish in this pitiful existence. Raising children and grandchildren can complete you as a person like few other things. Jerking off in a bottle or knocking up a r…
/r/TheRedPill21/05/19 01:26 PM
2

You'll be be squatting and benching twice your body weight in a year I'm all for incremental, evolutionary progress, but let's get real.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/19 01:48 PM
1

Just go in vitro, in countries like Ukraine you can choose gender. Also there are sperm centrifuges which you can use at home.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/19 06:04 PM
1

How can an easiness of living create suffering? Women can live on an easy mode, cruising in life, until deep into old age. I'v seen countless examples of that. They are financially subsidized by the taxpayer, emotionally by endless amount of betas available on a mouse click, and by every facet of the entertainment industry. Life is not fair, but their "punishment" comes from the inability to reproduce.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/19 08:38 PM
1

When you see how easily women can get sex, and feel that twinge of resentment and think to yourself that being a woman is easy, you are being solipsistic by projecting your sexual imperative onto the other sex. That's nonsense. It's objectively easier to be an average woman than an average man in today's society, by any metric that I can think of.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/19 02:32 PM
4

Part of my research is about the long-term impacts of the educational sex imbalance. They only get worse. It's very simple: most of those women won't reproduce, or will have at most a single child. Over the long run genes related to female intelligence, emancipation and hypergamy will grow extinct.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/19 12:38 PM
8

Most (90%+) of single mothers today are not because they man left them for some hotter younger chick. Fuck, in some ethnic/racial communities most children are being born out of wedlock. Also if you haven't noticed women no longer give birth to a dozen kids anymore because they're busy jumping on cocks in their 20s.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/19 12:55 AM
3

Your example is an irrelevant exception to the rule.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/19 12:20 AM
3

The hardest thing for all humans to do is change their opinion. It's not relagated to intellectuals. it's not about changing opinion, but being able to do so, i.e. not having any firmed opinion at all other than it being a logically coherent synthesis of your existing knowledge. To do that you must be able to critically examine data and change your "opinion" accordingly, if the data says so. Personally I think Taleb is wee to much on a contrarian train in general. Thinking logically however has …
/r/TheRedPill05/04/19 09:25 PM
1

I don't know why you're being down voted but that's true. He had an open marriage and his wife was banging other dudes.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/19 01:33 PM
9

And this is why women shouldn't have any voting rights.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/19 01:39 AM
8

A piece of investing advice: short any tech company with a female CEO.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/19 01:27 AM
1

no homo, but I kind of agree
/r/TheRedPill30/03/19 01:50 PM
2

If you don't mean combat sports practitioners, than yeah. However fully internalizing red pill means being a fighter in every domain - your body, brain, skills, business, social etc. Women don't love fighters, they love measurable results of hard work - money, social status, status symbols etc. They can pick on the "killer instinct" mentality, but if fail to produce measurable results they'll soon be gone.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/19 08:14 PM
0

It's "funny" because all women do it. They drug you with emotions of love and they rob you of your wealth by making you pay for everything while dating, married and divorced. Robbing alphas of their sperm is just another twist to it.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/19 10:23 AM
42

Fighters all seem a bit retarded though, getting smacked in the head so many time messes with your brain. I'll take my smooth skin over brain illness and cauliflower ears anytime.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/19 11:21 AM
3

women's mate selection instincts were not subjected to natural selection This is correct, not only for mate selection but for everything - intelligence, height, any kind of physical and cognitive ability it is men that exhibit greater variance. Y chromosome is the fastest evolving part of human genome. Women's mate selection criteria are stuck in stone age and that way 50% of fertile women in the West don't have children. Those bloodlines were deemed degenerate by evolution long time ago, it is …
/r/TheRedPill25/03/19 01:07 PM
8

Eastern European women still whore around when they move into the country capital from their small town, when traveling and when (they think) they can't get caught and judged. AWALT. But on average they are better than Western skanks who have been in open hypergamy mode since they were teenagers. But that is changing rapidly, the West now is what the East will look like in a generation. It's the culture that keeps them somewhat in check, not some different biological underpinning.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/19 12:38 PM
0

I come from the Balkans, which has been a confluence of civilizations for thousands of years, a bridge between continents. Persions got denied, Arabs got denied, Mongols god denied, Ottomans got denied, Napoleon got denied, Hitler god denied. Colonizing Goths, Celts, Roman populace was all exterminated. The country I come from is 98% ethnically pure this very day. If Muslims threw a fit they know mosques would be burning the next morning. Spanish and Norwegians are not real nations but artificia…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/03/19 10:23 AM
0

I was never conquered. I smack dumb bitches and manginas such as yourself in their face.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/19 05:42 PM
-1

no it's r/ignoreScientificEvidence.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/19 05:26 PM
-13

I don't hate women but nevertheless I think they're stupid.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/19 11:34 AM
1

I've checked records for height, the Dutch have in the last 150 years grown on average 20 centimeters, Americans 6cm etc. While natural selection hasn't been completely confirmed, some studies show that taller people have had more children so it could be a factor to reproductive success at a time of demographic explosion. 150 years is 5-7 generations so it's really nothing. Macroevolution is just a bunch of microevolutions bunched together.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/19 09:35 AM
1

You mentioned traits selected through natural selection. Paper proves that such traits could be selected in only few generations. Microevolution or Macroevolution doesn't matter. Your thesis is disproven. Anyways trait such as height is macro-evolution, which takes exponentially more time to produce significant change. Height (like IQ) is determined by no single genes, but by many. Of course it would take longer time for it to be selected but nowhere near "tens of thousands of years" like you me…
/r/TheRedPill13/03/19 12:05 PM
1

So somehow human females really fucked up in their selection of mates if size strength and aggression was what they cared about. They selected jack shit for the majority of our species existence. Up until few generations ago everyone was basically living on the edge of starvation. What choice do 14,15,16 year old girls have? Exactly none. They could express their preferences for sure, but otherwise they were married soon to a mate that could sustain them and children. What we have today is their…
/r/TheRedPill13/03/19 12:01 PM
1

A 41% Transsexual population attempt to suicide at some point in their lives - the highst % of any group. That's actually excellent news. Degenerate transsexuals eliminating themselves from the gene pool.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/19 12:43 PM
2

for complex organisms, discernible differences in selected trait through natural selection takes tens of thousands of years, not a few decades. Actually for long-lived species it could take just a few generations.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/19 08:54 AM
1

We are taller now due to better nutrition. Historically, the taller you were, the easier target you were in warfare and less likely you were to survive when the food was low doe to higher basal caloric intake. We are however weaker and less aggressive because those traits have been selected against ever since the dawn of civilization, 10,000 years ago. Death penalties, harsh punishment for violent crimes that effectively meant death such as being ostracized from tribe or city, wealth acquisition…
/r/TheRedPill12/03/19 08:48 AM
5

The outcome is women can select what's best for them It's not about female selection but male survival. Men were crucial to the survival of the tribe/warrior band, and nature made sure that cognitive and physical features exhibited a wide range of outcomes, so that they could ensure survival in every environment. Women weren't evolved to exhibit a wider array of mutations, simply because there was no pressure of natural selection for it. Any surviving male, be it smart or dumb, short or tall, sl…
/r/TheRedPill11/03/19 07:50 PM
1

No true Scotsman, blah blah sod off.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/19 05:06 PM
4

Women don't usually work because they want to be rich assholes, lording power over the unwashed masses. They do it so they can maintain a base level of existence completely independent of attachment to men. This in turn allows them to all pile up on sleeping with the best men, getting pregnant by the best men, etc. It allows them to have alpha children and still survive and raise those children to adulthood. That's worth the grind to them. More than half of women in the West of reproductive age …
/r/TheRedPill09/03/19 04:52 PM
1

Homo ergaster sexual dimorphism was reduced from its australopithecine ancestors, but was still greater than the dimorphism in modern humans. I said roughly but the tendency was still there (and even today men are much stronger than women, but not as much as they used to be). Sexual dimorphism is positively correlated with non-monogamy across species, and that humans evolved away from it only dispels the retarded theory that monogamy was "established by culture" and is not something built into o…
/r/TheRedPill06/03/19 12:13 PM
2

Sorry to bust your little theory, bot monogamous coupling far predates civilization, by millions of years (at least since Homo ergaster, 1.7 million years ago which is our first ancestor where males and females were roughly the same size, indicating that pair bonding was common and there was no harem structure like in gorillas). Monogamy started when weapons were first invented, and strength ceased to be a decisive factor to mate guard. Weapons forced monogamous coupling, which enabled prolongin…
/r/TheRedPill06/03/19 08:28 AM
2

In order for a dna test to work, they have to have something to compare it to. They sure as hell won't be getting that from me any time soon. They could get it from someone related to you if they uploaded it to some DNA service, and track you down. It's just a matte of time until govt has everyone's DNA sample anyway, and you will be retroactively held liable for child expenses for all the missed years. They'll grow up promiscuous anyway, that's just the culture and programming of the society we…
/r/TheRedPill02/03/19 12:46 PM
1

You clearly haven't read much have you? Go read some stoic philsophers or even some literature from the middle ages. This reply has no relevance to my original point. When women have no reproductive rights their assigned male is the only alpha available for her to worship. You are apparently too dumb to comprehend that. Sure he deflowered her, but that's not what initially drew the woman to him. In traditional societies, women were drawn to powerful/high status men. The attraction is built by st…
/r/TheRedPill02/03/19 12:35 PM
1

You can always piss in the toilet. Meaning not fuck cheating bitches, fuck your wife exclusively, fuck prostitutes or not fuck at all.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/19 10:24 PM
1

If the river is made out of people's pees it would be an applicable advice. But it isn't which means your analogy is retarded.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/19 10:02 PM
1

why would it? I can get some rando pregnant, doesn't mean i'll marry her or will stick around. Or she get an abortion. Or the state can track you down via the DNA. And that child without a father would grow up poor and promiscuous, and get killed early on and terminate your bloodline. It's not a viable reproduction strategy on a larger scale. I care nothing for Western Society and hope it burns. Its past its best before date. Why don't you kill yourself? Even better, relocate to some shithole co…
/r/TheRedPill01/03/19 10:01 PM
0

Even then women are attracted to men who's violence is hidden/restrained but is bursting to get out. No, in the setting her husband is the only alpha in her life. The one who deflowered he, the one who provides, and who keeps making her children to keep her a busy and respected mother. Of course there are always more attractive males, or the one with higher status, but both them and her know that hooking up will result in serious consequences. That is where stories of chivalry come from. A viole…
/r/TheRedPill01/03/19 09:59 PM
1

By choosing to fuck a slot, instead of shaming her publicly or by notifying her husband, you're just hastening the degeneracy. You are no worse than she is.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/19 09:20 PM
1

Physical force is not necessary when hypergamy is hamstrung by society's institutions such as laws, tradition and culturally programmed behaviors. That is still at work at Islamic and other traditional countries. It has worked relatively well for hundreds of thousands of years.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/19 09:18 PM
4

Because that egotism will lead to your genetic extinction. You must have a stake in the society's future by means of progeny, or everything you do is for nothing, vapid hedonism.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/19 09:14 PM
1

The society was winning when women had no or limited reproductive choices, when their mates were elected by their fathers and brothers to seal tribal bonds, enhance alliances, family wealth or status. And it has worked pretty good for hundreds of thousands of years.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/19 09:14 PM
1

Nobody is stronger than a bullet or a knife, and all it takes is one half-assed attempt to kill you. Disrespecting other men by intentionally moving into their personal space will work until it doesn't.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/19 02:51 PM
7

Until her hubby finds out and you get smacked in the face with a false rape accusation, or worse beaten or gunned down. Or she gets pregnant and hooks you up for child support. Or gives you AIDS. Etc. Yes you "win" and the husband "loses" but society as a collective loses as well.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/19 02:48 PM
6

that if a man is not able to make his girl infatuated with him all the time, and she is not able to control her behavior, then he should dump her Then every women would cheat whenever the opportunity presents itself. We have better things to do than let hoes make choices on their stone-age level instincts. Mate guarding has been a viable strategy for millions of years for our ancestors, and there is no reason to let it go. You are all fucking retarded and 100% deserve all the crap hypergamy thro…
/r/TheRedPill01/03/19 02:45 PM
11

"Hoes get horny, niggas die" -2Pac
/r/TheRedPill28/02/19 12:33 PM
11

Mate guarding leads to reproductive success. It's an instinct programmed by evolution, and something perfectly normal. However, the laws and social climate in the West is such that it enables indefinite female hypergamy, and as a man there is literally nothing you can do about it. Make no mistake - most Muslim women are hoes as well, and given the right opportunity and freedom to do so, they will branch swing to a male with a higher status, having more money etc. Men today have the freedom to br…
/r/TheRedPill28/02/19 12:29 PM
2

As I said, measured IQ has been rising, but overall average intelligence (per capita) has been declining due to dysgenics. The smarter the man or woman, the less kids they have. Also heavy inbreeding in Muslims (whose demographics are exploding). Measured IQ rise due to better nutrition, schooling etc. has a limit, after that it's going down, and recent surveys have in fact shown that.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/19 09:54 AM
2

No we haven't, measured IQ has been rising in some societies, but overall average intelligence has been declining due to dysgenics.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/19 09:53 AM
1

Then explain how on average we're getting dumber every generation since the mind 19th century.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/19 09:45 PM
7

It's called gracilization and has been observed in all tamed species, as well as human bones even since the forager-settler transition occurred. The soy era is just the peak of this process whereby society's institutions (media, schools and learned behavior) play the role that the death penalty and ostracization played during the history, i.e. removing the non-docile strains from the gene pool. Of course eating crap food, not lifting, breathing poison that passes as air in the cities, sitting on…
/r/TheRedPill21/02/19 09:32 PM
2

She really wasn't at all. That is the biggest red flag. Irreligious women are never loyal and always look to branch swing. Being religious is a necessary precondition for a woman to consider a LTR in my book. It indicates a primordial fear of being left alone and a desire to be submissive to her man. She wants God to arrange her a husband to submit to (as opposed to getting drunk on a night out and leave the chance to let it "happen"). If she's proudly atheist, "liberal", vehement LGBT supporter…
/r/TheRedPill15/02/19 11:06 AM
6

There is nothing inherently wrong with that.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/19 11:49 PM
6

The only thing feminism is doing is breeding feminist hoes and career women out of gene pool. The next generation of womyn will be a bit more docile, a bit more stupid, and have a bit stronger maternal instincts. Little by little, evolution gets rid of degenerate bloodlines. And it's beautiful.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/19 09:35 AM
1

They can be having families even 50 years from now. They can make a choice now, at any moment, to create economic value and attract a mate, out of global pool of 2-3 billion single women of reproductive age. It's not that hard. But they simple choose not to. The problem lies in women in their region, which have through generations ruined marriage laws, voted for excessive taxation and open borders. Until Western men grow back their balls they kind of deserve all this shit.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/19 10:17 PM
1

Remember that social help was virtually non existant compated to today. Homeless childs would die in the streets. It was already hard to make enough for oneself. There was plenty of social help, it just wasn't government and tax-funded institutions, but from your family and extended kin. The only children who would die in the streets would be from those who had neither, which was a form of natural selection, to weed out bloodlines that weren't conducive to forming stable nuclear families with go…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/19 10:59 AM
1

You can already see this happening. Some people are pulling ahead, while others are being left behind and falling out of the gene pool. We think society freed us from natural selection. But society is as much a ruthless wilderness as the plains and jungles we once stalked. Check again, the poor, dumb and degenerate have much higher fertility rates than the rich, disciplined and prosperous. African population quadrupled in half a century whereas European stayed almost the same. That shit has been…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/19 10:53 AM
6

We may not go back to 1 man for 17 women, but it happened less than 10000 years ago and with automation in the future we could get 1 man for 5 women Men will never allow that. Even if they do, the sons of those that did reproduce won't. Open hypergamy is a ticking time bomb that will result in women getting stripped of all reproductive rights, this time for good.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/19 10:42 PM
6

But it has always been like this. The top 20% get to reproduce. It hasn't been like that for hundreds of generations, when the population has been 99.9% smaller than today. We are no longer in the cavemen society. Monogamous marriage has been "invented" by all countries around the globe for a simple reason - it's the optimal group survival strategy. Societies built on harems and with a surplus of young horny men without children implode very quickly.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/19 10:38 PM
3

TLDR- Hypergamy has helped our species to survive through a long evolution in a brutal environment. Embrace it It is also obsolete - note how most "quality" women don't reproduce anymore. Our species' evolution hasn't been about survival for thousands of years now. The sexual selection algos are obsolete, and both Chads and hoes have been bred out of gene pool ever since civilization was created. Western hoes are but a blink in the species timeline. Evolutionary imperative is to reproduce, not t…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/19 10:35 PM
2

It's a theory taken from observation of an animal genetically similar to us. I present it so that we may glean from it what knowledge that we can. Humans and chimpanzees are separated by millions of years of evolution. Even human populations separated by tens of thousands years have significant differences that influence reproductive strategies. You haven't done your research well.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/18 05:34 PM
1

Artificial wombs and clones will come, and that will be the end of female sex. The only question is will it come sooner or later than breeding whores out of gene pool, which is what going on today.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/18 10:39 AM
7

Yes, it's evolutionarily beneficial for them to be ignorant. Women that were"self-aware" and not solipsistic branch-swinging hypergamous hoes were swiftly eliminated from the gene pool, because that strategy is ultimately fertility negative. Modern feminism is just another evolutionary filter, cultural "shit test" for women by species - those unable to pursue their biological imperatives won't have children, or will have them few but without a father, living in poverty or on welfare etc. Female …
/r/TheRedPill22/11/18 10:16 AM
-1

High levels of soreness indicate that you’ve exceeded the capacity to repair muscle Not if you rest enough and eat properly. Soreness is a palpable indicator of muscle damage, which is one of the three elements of hypertrophy. By intensity and duration of soreness it's trivial to estimate whether you need to increase weights. I suspect that your entire post refers to steroid users with enhanced muscle repairs.
/r/TheRedPill22/11/18 09:56 AM
5

Life is about achieving fame, "imperishable fame" as ancient Indo-Europeans knew 6000 years ago. Or Kleos. Having kids is the easiest way of doing so by perpetuating your genes. Other ways require extraordinary courage, talent or sacrifice. The choice is yours.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/18 11:54 PM
1

Bench press (flat) is one of the worst exercises for pectoralis major activation and hypertrophy. I immediately relegate anyone advocating it to the "ignorant" category. It's too heavy on your joints and it's best be used only as a measure of strength progress on other exercises.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/18 06:35 PM
1

it's a watered-down variation of an old advice - don't waste time with women that don't chase you. if she's not chasing you, next the bitch
/r/TheRedPill24/10/18 11:49 AM
1

It doesn't, but the effects are worse. Ironically during controlled hypergamy in the marriage of old men were more aware of it than they are now when it's in the open, because brainwashing is in schools and media (not to mention drugs given to children though food, water and medicine) is harsher.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/18 10:01 AM
0

That's a modern phenomenon, because today's "poor" are actually quite rich by the standards of one or two generations ago. Before whoring around with supicious men and bearing children out of wedlock was not tolerated.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/18 04:06 PM
-1

My retarded statistics put context to your MGTOW "blame women for everything" idea. That context proved your theory pure bs. Welfare boomed the instant women were given the right to vote. They receive most of the tax money via welfare transfers, and their poor life choices driven by their lizard brain are subsidized by working age men (and ironically spinster high-achieving womyn). The poorer the country, the the stronger the social institutions like marriage are, and more hypergamy is curbed. Y…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/18 04:04 PM
1

Single moms don't invalidate the point. It's a wealth transfer from those who work to those who don't. Single mothers are irrelevant since even "working" women are net beneficiaries in tax terms, directly or indirectly. I put working in quotation marks since in almost every developed country approximately two thirds those working for the government are women. Now that you mention them in your retarded stastics - it's only relevant to discuss them as a demographic in the reproductive, child beari…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/18 01:56 PM
0

Of course, but they were tiny. Today in Europe you are taxed more than 100% on labor, far more than it makes economic sense. The only reason why taxes are so high is because two third of population (women, old, children and social dregs) are budgetary parasites. Even in the US what, 60% of budget is spent on social services. Women are natural socialists, and welfare is the primary enabler of open hypergamy.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/18 09:20 AM
1

We don't have to pay for anything. We do because it's the law, and it's a law because womyn vote for welfare and wet their pants for felons. In the developing world criminals don't get pampered and the only medical care they get is shitty food and basic life support.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/18 09:07 AM
1

Our forefathers saw the wisdom in limiting marriage to one man + one woman. The alternative is to allow the upper 20% of men have 80% of the women, leaving hordes of angry betas to literally cause mischief and mayhem, disrupting social order. That has never happened in history, harems are unstable and were thus always limited to the ruler. Powerful men always made sure that average Joe has a stake in the society's future, which means marriage and kids. 20% men hoarding 80% of women is exactly wh…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/18 08:25 AM
3

And for you unempathetic savages who are thinking "fuck that, my taxes shouldn't go to support either option," go spend 35 seconds on Google researching "income inequality and crime" and "crime and social stability." These kids don't just conveniently disappear. Correlation does not imply causation. You have shitload of inequality and crime in modern Western welfare countries, it's just that it's conveniently hidden as a massive taxation, inflation, inability to buy a home or save money, subsidi…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/18 08:19 AM
15

The welfare state doesn't enable hypergamy. Yes it does. The poorer the country the less "open hypergamy" there is.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/18 08:14 AM
1

As regards to girls you describe in the first part of your comment (mutiple children with multiple men, whoring for resources etc..). I have literally 0 example of such girls in the LARGELY EXTENDED social circles of me, my friend, family, coworkers. We probably just don't live in the same environment. Of course girls cheat (and men also with yougner girls) but then what ? Just read Milan Kundera or Russian litterature and you'll see the same described in these old cultures, from men and women. …
/r/TheRedPill17/09/18 04:11 PM
1

I'm not from the US but Balkans. You are naive, all of them whore around, it's just that it isn't advertised publicly as much as in the degenerate Western countries because they have their social status at stake. They'll be judged by their mothers, grandmothers and girlfriends. But make no mistake, they are materialistic whores all of them, from little girls to 60 year olds that get divorced to reexperience young cock without judgement. Hypergamy doesn't care. The way I see it is that women's in…
/r/TheRedPill17/09/18 01:44 PM
3

we are in the middle of an evolutionary power play where its technically in your interesr to promote this thought process if you are a low value male. It's in the interest of the general society as well. Women default to whoring when their material needs are secured. A man will not produce excessive value of his labor for anything else then his children in a free society. No children for most men = no nuclear family as a building block of society = no society. Women's hypergamous instincts were …
/r/TheRedPill17/09/18 12:36 AM
6

They’ll die alone and unhappy... Yes and that's a good thing for our species. Let CC-riding hoes with no maternal instincts, no mate loyalty and no ability to secure the future of their family by selecting a quality mate be altogether eliminated from the gene pool. Don't try to "correct" them by opening their eyes to their solipsism and hypocrisy, and let the evolution do its thing. Good riddance!
/r/TheRedPill17/08/18 09:27 AM
44

Say "they went with all the good women" and observe the hamster having an epileptic seizure.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/18 09:22 AM
1

I watched a documentary on feminist laws in Israel, hypergamy is out in full force. You have a democracy and it's just a matter of time that laws get skewed and gene pool gets cucked. It's a road in a single direction.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/18 11:20 AM
1

Israel has been infected with feminism while orthodoxs and muslims outbreed the normal Jews. It's surrounded by enemies. It's just a matter of time before it implodes (or explodes lel). Should've taken the Soviet offer in Siberia. Muslims are a nuisance not a threat, though a necessary one at this point - it'll simply consolidate ethno-based identities and provide a reason to undo the decades of degenerate progressivism. But this time the job will be done systematically.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/18 11:23 AM
4

The last big pogrom (Holocaust) nearly wiped European Jews. With today's technology for locating and identifying I'd kindly STFU, because if a next big pogrom comes there won't be a need for another one.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/18 07:55 AM
5

There won't be any more big wars, the weapons are too strong now. Missiles are too fast to be intercepted, and nukes can generate extinction level events. What is happening is that conflict is being creating in lower levels of society - between sexes, economic wealth, ideologies (both liberal/conservative as well as sports teams, types of music and fashion and so on) - and women make their choice on their perceived winners. Which of course they are too dumb to make an informed decision on. Hence…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/18 09:41 PM
12

There is a golden rule in the natural world, 'adapt or die'. A lot of men have chosen to die. Better to die a free man, then die as an economic slave for the gynocracy.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/18 09:30 PM
1

And women are responding exactly how nature intended. And nature is responding by pushing such women out of gene pool. More than 50% of women of breeding age in the West are childless. And that is OK - each successive generation of women will have a bit stronger maternal instincts, and a bit stronger dependence on men. It's retarded to invoke evolution/nature as explanation - we conquered that shit long time ago. We create the rules now. "Weakness", "responsibility" and all your bullishit phrase…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/18 09:23 PM
-1

fake and pathetic. OP should be banned from the sub
/r/TheRedPill14/07/18 01:49 PM
3

An wise writer once wrote: All women are whores. Sorry mother, but you're a woman too.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/18 10:35 AM
7

Exactly - it all boils down to financial incentives. Ideology itself is secondary, it's just a necessary part of the feedback loop between the money and votes. Of course, the hamster and hypergamy provides the necessary justification, but it's not the primary cause. The moment that tax money stops flowing into the pocket of these "empowered" women would be the moment they all turn pious, conservative defenders of nuclear family.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/18 09:12 PM
7

It's not the capability for duplicity and manipulation, it's the lack of sens of fairness, honor and guilt. The former is the "natural" state of all organisms trying to survive and reproduce (maximize ROI for your genes), while the latter specifically evolved in humans (and some other higher primates) to support advanced forms of social organization and cooperation, eventually leading to modern civilization. That's also the reason why you see modern feminists openly advocating cuckolding, bonobo…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/18 08:40 PM
0

There is only one way to fix this - war.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/18 01:57 PM
0

The fun part is that women possess an intellect and capacity for critical thought to the exact same degree as men. No they don't, there are huge differences between male and female brains, from size and wiring to structure (e.g. gray/white matter distribution),
/r/TheRedPill18/05/18 11:49 AM
3

Note that almost every sentence has an "I" in it. (I stopped reading after the third paragraph). Women are so solipsistic that they cannot perceive the world outside the me me me lens. The use of the first-person pronoun is directly proportional to the strength of the hamster.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/18 07:43 AM
5

Mine is "They left with all the good women." It just freezes their brains.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/18 05:43 PM
38

It's indeed beautiful to see evolution in progress. It would've been even prettier had he not a child with her. Taken on a grander scale, the feminism acts as an evolutionary filter itself - the career-oriented feminist harpies with low maternal but intense hypergamous instincts, and absolute solipsism with no sense of appreciation of mens' sacrifice by and large get eliminated from the gene pool, with zero or at best a single child. It's just a matter of time before the son gets old enough to c…
/r/TheRedPill22/04/18 09:30 PM
2

The retarded leftist "everyone is equal" ideology. Giving women voting rights. Giving globalist corporations free reign on dictating immigration policies in order to bring down the cost of labor. Lack of group identity, especially the religion-nation mixture. Pussification of men. Brainwashing and sexualization by the media ran by leftards and Jews.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/18 07:53 AM
2

Iceland is an expensive, small and cold place. Irish govt has an official shitskin immigration policy. And this is your modern Swiss school class. Hungary is corrupt as fuck, full of gypsies and taxes are too big, Poland is still 50-50, though Schengen and free movement of shitskins invalidates pretty much any national policy. Nothing will change until traitors are publicly hanged and invaders expelled back to their shitholes.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/18 09:41 PM
3

the number of women who haven't had children is approaching nearly 25% That's an average across all generations, per generation. At this moment in pretty much all Western countries the number of women of reproductive age that have never borne children is > 50%. It'll probably peak somewhere in between (33-37%) as women with lower maternal instincts are removed from the gene pool and replaced by women with higher fertility and maternal instincts.
/r/TheRedPill26/03/18 02:26 PM
1

The brains are "wired" differently? The differences are minimal. You're ignorant, educate yourself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience_of_sex_differences From size (10%), quantity of gray/white matter down to MRI-confirmed wiring I know plenty of successful professional women you can have intelligent conversations with who run rings around their male peers: doctors, lawyers, businesswomen, etc. It's female manipulation at work, not intelligence. Many smart men were and are used, abused a…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/18 10:07 AM
1

nurture IS the deciding factor with regard to who enters into the leadership and managerial castes. without genetic potential, nurture has zero effect. Genetics is the baseline, nurture is the cream. Weak people in leadership roles by birth get crushed, evidence of which are countless revolutions against hereditary rulers. all the affirmative action and positive discrimination in the world can't make up for the women's inherent defects, hence why they all know instinctively, in their guts, that …
/r/TheRedPill18/03/18 12:29 PM
1

I don't deny nurture, I just deny its deciding factor. Nurture is a part of evolutionary process, useful for transmitting survival strategies acquired over generations. What we've have now however is nurture in service of capitalist economy, feminist interest groups, governments eager to keep tabs on population etc. - which is abomination from survivalist standpoints, hence the demographic reversal, mass shootings, trans degeneracy and so on. Every time you give women the right to chose what wil…
/r/TheRedPill18/03/18 01:59 AM
1

The blank state theory has been debunked countless times. Neurplasticity will only get you so much explanatory power. Culturally we're reverting to the natural, free-for-all no-holds-barred sexual marketplace. Good luck chasing unicorns.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/18 12:48 AM
1

I've never seen a story where woman's self-reflectiveness wasn't explainable by other means. They don't have an opinion of their own, they just go with the flow. Their mind has an ability to completely change opinions in an instant without cognitive dissonance, adapt to the new situation while completely disregarding thoughts she head earlier. In that process she'll tell whatever is the most beneficial for her. Objective truth is unobtainable for a woman's mind. That's why they've been stripped …
/r/TheRedPill16/03/18 09:54 AM
1

some women have the discipline and self-control to marry a man for practical reasons, remain faithful, and live out their wildest fantasies with Chad in their head, or if married to Chad, then Brad and Thad. No, these women have been filtered from the gene pool long ago. Any women exhibiting such behavior is doing at as a manipulation tactic to attract a mate, or out of fear of repercussions. Normal women have no ability to self-reflect on their actions, it's evolutionarily disadvantageous for t…
/r/TheRedPill15/03/18 10:51 PM
1

Oh there is still religion, though it's not that much of a factor. People cling very much to their identities though. There is no "Muslim flood", they are just passed further to Germany and other Western European countries. The number of people granted asylum in countries like Serbia and Croatia in the last 25 years in total is like 500, and these are heavily vetted. Every so often you hear Soros NGO propaganda media shitting on how invaders are ill treated, beaten etc. Nobody wants them, and th…
/r/TheRedPill14/01/18 10:00 PM
5

I cannot see any of european civilization surviving personally Balkans overthrew Ottoman yoke after six centuries of occupation, genocide, forced conversions etc., we don't fear IQ-70 inbred dysgenics from Africa and the Middle East. If they start acting out like they do in the Western Europe, mosques will burn along with any fools supporting them.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/18 10:31 AM
5

If you look at the stock charts, the longest business cycle lasted 120 months, so it means another great recession is at the doors. At most summer 2019. The perfect storm is brewing.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/18 12:29 AM
1

Actually, general intelligence has steadily been increasing over at least the past 100-120 years so. Intelligence is genetic and thus hereditary. What has been increasing is the measure of intelligence which is due to better schooling, knowledge management, nutrition and other factors. Genetic intelligence however defines an upper bound on the measure of intelligence, and at some point those factors affecting the measure of intelligence cease to be relevant (diminishing returns), which can be se…
/r/TheRedPill27/12/17 08:31 PM
1

That said, traits like general intelligence and conscientiousness will become (and I think are becoming) increasingly more attractive to women over time. No they won't. People are getting dumber (lesser IQ) on average because there is no more natural selection, since everyone reaches reproduction age, and because dumber and poorer people have more kids (as a hedge). Worse, higher education amongst both men and women negatively correlates with reproductive success, there is 50+ years of data acro…
/r/TheRedPill26/12/17 12:32 PM
1

Actually the female reproductive strategy (hypergamy) leads to an increase in the genetic quality of successive generations. By only mating with the top portion of the male hierarchies and cuckolding the rest, we end up with successive generations of alpha genes propagating. This isn't the case since the advent of culture (the last 10k years). Modern females make choice of what "alpha" is by evolutionary instincts that have zero applications in the modern world. Guys that make the modern world g…
/r/TheRedPill25/12/17 02:50 PM
1

virtuous women who are happy to do their roles Unicorns don't exist. They are all dumb whores. Apparent exceptions are solely due to the fear of the consequences of their immediate environment. But change the environment, and they'll act on their dishonorable, hypergamous instincts. Women are as "virtuous" as society prevents them not to be.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/17 07:03 PM
5

3rd world countries are still increasing their population as technology increases how much food, water and other resources they have. That's why people think the population will still grow to 11 billion, then decline. No it won't. Africa didn't decrease its population growth despite shitload of technological and social improvements after WW2 and the end of colonialism. Neither did most Middle Eastern Muslim countries where patriarchy is going strong. Global population will keep increasing until …
/r/TheRedPill21/09/17 02:04 PM
1

Sure, but mass democracy is doomed. It was a way to buy off the proles in the industrial era ('look, we'll let you decide which of us gets to boss you around!'), and the 1% won't need that for much longer, because they won't need the proles. How exactly is it doomed? What are "elites" going to do exactly? Kill everyone? In the age of mass media and Internet where you go to prison for a politically incorrect tweet? The 1%-ers can't do shit on their own, they're wholly dependent on the system itse…
/r/TheRedPill24/08/17 07:36 PM
5

Demographics is largely irrelevant at this point. Demographics is everything in a democracy. One person = one vote. The land and the political system belongs to the most populous group with a shared identity. As more and more work is automated away, we'll have no need of a large population. There was never a "need" for large population. Population just keeps growing naturally. Demographics on a downward spiral is an aberration, an unnatural trend brought about by unnatural tendencies in the soci…
/r/TheRedPill24/08/17 09:38 AM
48

It's already being dethroned. All Western societies are dying demographically. They have population growth only due to immigration and patriarchal minorities (mostly Muslim, but also various Christian denominations in the US) having lots of children. Feminism is fertility-negative and women supporting it will naturally go extinct. That's why supporting abortion is good in the long term - sluts having accidental pregnancies shouldn't have children anyway.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/17 08:09 PM
1

I'm from there, and the argument that there is less space is idiotic. In my former country in the capitol literally half of flats are empty, and there is no property tax because how would poor grannys (with assets worth half a million euros plus) pay them? One square feet of apartment is like three average salaries. Same shit in every European country, be it poor or rich - laws are established to suck the wealth created by labor from youth to the old who are 10-100x as wealthy. Be it healthcare,…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/17 07:16 AM
1

Well I don't know about you, but I ordinarily slap people in the face when they advocate socialism to me. That after demonstrating to everyone how retarded, hypocritical and pathetic they are, by reducing their arguments to nothing. It's OK to slap, if there is no physical proof of damage they can't report you to the police.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/17 10:36 PM
1

Europe is a dying continent. The youth don't want to have children and flee to Asia and Anglosphere. Demographics is the only indicator of the evolutionary fitness of culture. I'm sure Romans were proud as well of their "living condition" moments before they were overrun by barbarians. The matter is black and white. When 50% of your women of reproductive age don't have children it's red alert. When you work more for others than for yourself it's red alert. When 95% of the wealth is controlled by…
/r/TheRedPill15/08/17 10:33 PM
1

I don't think just because the best and brightest end up in America means that America is creating that value. Only that people know they can keep more of their money there. It would be like the Cayman Islands claiming to be a business hub. They are just creaming of from the others with more realistic tax regimes No idiot, literally the best and the brightest from around the world go to America. Best programmers, scientists, entrepreneurs. They create lots of value because all the money is there…
/r/TheRedPill15/08/17 05:13 PM
0

It went from the most advanced and well run rail system in the world to a clusterfuck of companies draining the public property for profit. That is crumbling infrastructure. And it's still better than "free" and "public" transportation in most other cities. In my former country they still had wooden trams that were like half a century old, and monthly pass was like 10% of average salary (of course it's "free"/subsidized for pensioners, students, family members of employees, public sector workers…
/r/TheRedPill15/08/17 01:24 PM
1

I've already evaded paying more taxes than government has stolen from me throughout my adult life. I don't vote because I don't support democracy. Don't personalize this issue, I'm fine, I'm simply pointing out the inherent injustice.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/17 01:07 PM
3

I'd gladly pay for roads. Schools and hospitals have no place in government hands, apart for some basic plans for the poor. The problem is when you analyze budget, most of the taxes end up not financing basic shit needed for civilization, but pensioners (who are on average pretty rich), military, corporations via public tenders, and various government monopolies in education, healthcare, law etc. If infrastructure, education and healthcare were a priority we wouldn't have had such a crumbling in…
/r/TheRedPill15/08/17 08:25 AM
1

Unfortunately I don't live in US, where taxes are pretty low when compared to Europe. Luckily I don't also have to pay taxes on my global income, which US citizens have to. Anyway, it's not a question of musts - taxes must be paid, it's a critique of the system which sells itself as a fantasy, camouflaged with euphemisms such as "free", "solidarity", "fair share" etc., as well as disrespect for the portion of population that actually keeps the shit going. It uncannily resembles the whole blue pi…
/r/TheRedPill15/08/17 08:16 AM
4

Yeah when you analyze terms such as "public" and "free" and realize what they really mean is "financed by taxes forcibly imposed imposed upon others", it all becomes much clearer. Cleaning shit-stained toilets and sucking dick for money is also a productive job on a free market, you could start with that.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/17 11:25 PM
3

The move towards services has been going on steadily for decades. Agriculture is like 1% of the economy of developed countries, and its feeding everyone. Producing shit and manual jobs are long overdue for automation. We've been automating highly sophisticated cognitive tasks and what is the outcome? Millions upon millions of new programmers needed every day. Algorithms automatically move hundreds of billions of dollars a day on stock markets but we still need even more men to oversee and mainta…
/r/TheRedPill14/08/17 11:09 PM
1

no one single ideology governing the world but that we operate in a sort of amalgamation of ideologies Oh there is a single ideology - the one providing most economic incentives to the ones having an executive power in the society. In a democracy where every moron has a right to vote, once a country becomes sufficiently technologically developed that huge chunks of population can reap the benefits of money stolen by taxing the productive portions of economy, that's inevitably socialism. In some …
/r/TheRedPill14/08/17 10:53 PM
1

"public" is an euphemism for "built from stolen money". If these services were provided by the free market, and you were a productive member of the society, you would've had 10 times better experience simply due to your enhanced disposable income. Just because the government "provides" it doesn't meant that it's either the best or the only possible way.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/17 10:48 PM
7

Google is a company with a political agenda. Julian Assange wrote an interesting piece on it. In short, Google, Facebook and Twitter are in cahoots with the State Department, intelligence agencies and the feminist/globalist/open borders crowd. Never trust them, and never expose yourself to them. But it's pointless to ignore them since they are so pervasive, and provide services not replicable elsewhere - just make sure you minimize your exposure.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 11:36 PM
2

what makes traditional gender roles important to you? I would be interested in learning why you value them highly. Civilization cannot be built or maintained without them. For an individual it means nothing, since individual sexual strategy is amoral. But from the larger society's perspective, it means a lot. If you want to have sons that continue your line, you should care. Otherwise, use women for your pleasure.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/17 10:12 AM
6

My favorite proverb (not from the Bible but heard it from Muslims): "Beat your wife regularly; even if you don't know why, she will."
/r/TheRedPill29/07/17 12:41 PM
2

It will take millennia to eliminate something that has 1,2,5% impact. It's worse - something like 30-40%+ women of the reproductive age don't have children already. Even if it's 5%, it's five generations times 20-25 years = a a mere century to eliminate 30% of the unfit female gene pool. It's a huge chunk by any metric, not to mention the effect of outbreeding by other more fit women. A century is but a blip in the history of our species. What IS happening... and happening fast... is that not on…
/r/TheRedPill28/07/17 10:56 PM
2

It's a biological reality. That they're physically weaker is obvious, but for cognitive ability it's also true - 10% smaller brains, less white matter, very different neuron wiring, IQ more narrowly distributed around the mean, less grit and risk-taking ability etc. There is a reason why all the best fashion designers, cooks, teachers, <insert typical female job> are all men.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/17 09:53 PM
1

That's not what's going on actually. Most Western women today of younger generations won't have children, and the more developed the society and the more educated woman is, the lesser chances are that she'll reproduce at all. Look at the actual numbers. Whores with artificially propped up SMV are being eliminated from the gene pool. And the single moms are statistically the poorest . You can't beat evolution, and evolution only cares about reproductive fitness, and feminism is a fertility negati…
/r/TheRedPill28/07/17 09:30 PM
2

The numbers say otherwise. 30-40% of existing childless women of reproductive age in the developed countries won't have children, ever. The degenerate feminist gene is being weeded out of the gene pool. Meanwhile, fertility rates of the patriarchal alternatives are going through the roof. It's just a matter of time.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/17 04:15 PM
17

That dytopian shit will never materialize. What will happen is that most of those dumb "educated" hoes will self-select into extinction, and the fertility-positive patriarchal cultures (Islam, Orthodoxy, traditionalist Christianity, sub-Saharan Africans..) will drown the dumb Westerners in numbers, imposing their own values. In fact, that's already happening. Sooner or later abortions, egg freezing, divorce, homo marriages and other retarded instruments of feminism against nuclear family will be…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/17 10:50 PM
0

She certainly wouldn't have lived as a pauper if she snagged some much less (with respect to Trump) rich athlete, business owner or a minor celebrity. The point was that she had a plenty of choice, it's not like Trump was her golden ticket. Calling her a trophy wife is a bit far-fetched. Are Gisele Bündchen and Elin Nordegren also throphy wifes just because there spouses are/were much richer? I don't think so.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/17 09:08 AM
1

Nothing's wrong with that per se (I was given birth at a similar age, after more than a decade of trying). But as I sad, for practical purposes. If you meet a women at an age of 35, you need at least one year proper dating period - getting to know her social circle, vacationing together etc., at least six months of cohabitation, marriage planning (where I live marriage is planned a whole year in advance), after marriage an unknown number of attempts at impregnation, 9 months of incubation - in a…
/r/TheRedPill28/05/17 08:58 AM
6

Take the recently elected French President Macron, who's wife has 25 years to his senior. He is a childless virgin degenerate. Just like Merkel, May, Rutte, Gentiloni, Juncker and a host of other Eruopean childless "leaders". They are genetic dead-ends, in no way representative of normalcy or natural order of things. The value of women is in their fertility, nothing else. That's why 35+ women are useless for practical purposes. Ironically, I don't see anyone here on red pill criticism Melania Tr…
/r/TheRedPill27/05/17 10:23 PM
1

There is no need for isolating experiments. They are dumbed-down simplification of reality made up by ivory-tower academicians which enables them to interpret things with their simple minds. Extrapolating them to make general-purpose conclusions for systems hundreds of orders of magnitude more complex is a travesty. As I said - degenerate bloodlines which will be laughed upon further down the line.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/17 06:16 PM
1

Reality is a one big experiment.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/17 06:00 PM
1

evolutionary theory was invented by "academics living off other people's money", Evolution was not invented but discovered - it's an algorithm built into the fabric of the universe. Darwin's Beagle voyage was funded entirely by private means. Modern academic research is but a fancy money laundering - everything worth a dime comes from private sector anyways. Most academic papers are recycled and useless crap, peer-review system is manipulated and broken, and most scientific "research" has proven…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/17 04:05 PM
3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience_of_sex_differences#Male_vs._female_brain_anatomy Very different hardware.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/17 03:02 PM
1

History can be seen as an evolutionary competition between different cultures, representing different reproduction strategies, maximising or minimising different aspects of human potential. Unlike ideologically-colored theories fabricated by morons in the academia living off other people's money, it's reality itself, stripped of any kind of subjective idealism and preconceived bias. Centuries from now, when your bloodline which reeks of commie equalist beta degeneracy is extinct, along with that…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/17 03:00 PM
2

All your arguments can be summarized to... "across history men have been more influential/dominant in X field, therefore it demonstrates that men are psychologically and biologically superior to women" History is evidence by itself. If the nature of biology were any different, across countless cultures and civilizations, history would've yielded different results. But it's not so it hasn't. Patriarchy rules supreme, and women truly are dumb hormone cocktails evolved to bear children. You're hams…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/17 02:46 PM
3

The scientific evidence is quite clear that women and men share near identical cognitive capacities. No it isn't. Mens' brains are 10% bigger and structurally very different. From gray/white matter distribution to the degree of development at the same age. Women are dumber on every metric. They evolved to be reproduction machines not invent things.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/17 02:43 PM
7

humans are not designed to be monogamous They are also not designed to make space shuttles, stock exchanges, GMO food and harvest nuclear energy. Monogamous relationship and nuclear family is the staple of civilization. Preserving it is an evolutionary imperative.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/17 01:20 AM
1

You don't own women Why not? That's all that they really want anyway. To be owned and fucked by a powerful alpha. Their instincts for "independence" are just a variation of that desire.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/17 01:15 AM
4

Why the hell do you care if females ride dicks on erasmus or whatever??? Because it ruins their pair bonding potential. They will be worse off later as potential partners. Everything that keeps female sexuality in check is a good thing.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/16 10:50 AM
4

The royal families don't have influence to the political sphere anymore. Then why do they get invited to Bilderberg meetings, and send their kids to elite boarding schools and colleges to mingle with the capitalist elite?
/r/TheRedPill25/06/16 10:48 AM
6

if someone can produce the product cheaper at a higher quality, he should have to have a right for higher market share No it shouldn't. Nations should protect the prosperity of their citizens. British government should work for the benefit of the British people, not Indian, or Chinese. Wealth coming from globalization asymptotically channels to the pockets of the top few percent, even if means cheaper products for everyone in the short-term. Death of the middle class means death of the nation. U…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/16 10:42 AM
5

As of 2016, commercial surrogacy for foreigners is illegal in India and Thailand. There are other countries where it's perfectly legal though - Russia, Mexico, Georgia, Ukraine. Femicunts in India shut a billion dollar industry. Window of opportunity still exists, but the clock is ticking.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/16 09:46 AM
8

I don't think you know what the word genocide means.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/16 12:55 PM
2

In a way, it is natural. The next step of evolution of our species is beyond nationalism - integration of all individuals into a global system. Be it a Borg-like collective consciousness, or a a racial medley free of observable biological differences. Either way, nuclear family promoting perpetuation of similar genes is a hindrance towards that goal. Even if Islam or other family-oriented fertility-positive cultures demographically substitute white West, the evolutionary imperative of fitness se…
/r/TheRedPill24/01/16 05:11 PM
2

They're brains are so fucked and compartmentalized they don't even know their own bullshit is bullshit. It's the only way for the scam to work. I've met plenty of honest and selfless women, and most of them do not have kids and are not married. Self-deception and solipsism is a trait selected for through reproduction.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/16 01:24 AM
5

From the perspective of resilience, it's better to delegate protection to families than the state. Because if the state fails, entire nation suffers. If a father fails just his family suffers. Failure of the state seems to be however a self-fulfilling prophecy with rich progressivist countries, an inevitability that destroys the society from within.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/16 01:15 AM
1

And they wonder why traditionalist societies stone women to death for adultery. Cuckolding is the ultimate crime, deserving ultimate punishment.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/16 02:43 AM
1

When Russians do it it's called "troll factories" in the MSM. When the West does it it's called Human Science Operations Cell and it's not widely reported.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/16 02:55 AM
1

The Western female is well and truly fucked. Those with weak baby instincts will be left out of the gene pool. What will be left is the women having instincts to have as many babies possible, as young as possible. I see feminism/liberalism as the Great Filter of the unworthy, men and women alike.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/15 01:32 AM
3

Premise still holds, if the Ottomans had allied with Britain/France instead of Germany/Austria-Hungary it would still be around and we would not have a problem in the Middle East. No they wouldn't. Ottoman culture was dysgenic like all Muslim cultures. Their elite forces Jannisaries where hand-picked Christian boys, and slavery was widespread. Once the pool of slaves and renewed gene influxes based on meritocracy was cut, it was doomed to fail.
/r/TheRedPill01/11/15 09:39 AM
14

.I've realised how important I am, how important my life is, and, rather than risk being hurt, I concentrate on me and that's helped me become very successful in my professional life.' Me me me. After failing to perform her basic biological functions she is still solipsistic beyond belief. I, for once, find it excellent news that these stupid self-centered hoes are out of the gene pool.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 10:43 AM
3

We all notice here that secular society provides no basis for family or community. In Communism the state was supposed to replace the family unit. That's why they actively promoted all of those family disintegration movements. They've gone full circle within merely a generation: The early Soviet state sought to remake the family, believing that although the economic emancipation of workers would deprive families of their economic function, it would not destroy them but rather base them exclusive…
/r/TheRedPill18/10/15 10:16 AM
1

It's a blessing in disguise. If she cannot cut through such obvious social propaganda that runs against her health and mate attraction interests by simply keeping her mouth closed, she's not the best choice for gene sharing anyway. The more obvious naive slobs around us, the more obvious pool of worthy women to engage with.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/15 02:05 AM
3

There's no particular path that's better or not better. This is the essence. All paths are the same: they lead nowhere. A warrior must know first that his acts are useless, and yet, he must proceed as if he didn't know it. That's what shamans of ancient Mexico called "controlled folly." A warrior lives by acting, not by thinking about acting, nor by thinking about what he will think when he has finished acting. A warrior chooses a path with heart, any path with heart, and follows it; and then he…
/r/TheRedPill10/10/15 09:36 AM
2

Merkel has been an overall good leader apart from this (appalling) lapse in judgment. Perhaps on domestic front, but her foreign relations record is catastrophic. Beside the idiotic invitation of tens of millions of third-worlders to the heart of Europe, there is also the Greek bailout debacle, Euro meltdown, alienation of Russia over Ukraine, chickening out on Snowden affair which revealed surveillance of both the government and citizenry by the supposed "allies"; and most recently the push for…
/r/TheRedPill27/09/15 04:23 PM
-1

The lack of progress is not a regression. We are already sufficiently technologically advanced today to provide decent living for the majority of the society without them ever working. I originate from a developing country that has merely 28% taxpayer population - for the developed countries percentage could come way down. If the scenario that you describe ever becomes a threat to national security, I have no doubt that the issue will be tackled at the upper echelons of power. Human generations …
/r/TheRedPill26/09/15 08:34 PM
-5

What you'll get is sliding backwards technologically, Malthusian limits reasserting themselves, and hopes for a human future among the stars extinguished. There will be no sliding back to Dark Ages because all of the knowledge and the technological know-how is preserved digitally today, and not stored on perishable paper and in human heads. Islam is more obsessed with social order than The-World-Is-Flat sort of "truths".
/r/TheRedPill26/09/15 08:14 PM
49

The current system in the West won't collapse, it will just be replaced with something else that does place social controls on female sexuality. It will either come through Islam, or through restoration of Marriage 1.0 rules. Feminism is fertility-negative and will weed itself out from the gene pool in the long term. The same is valid for the naive blue-pill men (who get cucked and whose work is used to subsidize fertility-positive cultures through taxes) and jaded but childless red-pill men. Th…
/r/TheRedPill26/09/15 01:14 PM
2

Surrogate motherhood on a donor egg is not cheap. It's also illegal in many jurisdictions. Also, children in their early years need mother to bond with, and have access to breast milk for health reasons. Daughters also need mothers for guidance and imprinting of social values.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/15 12:17 AM
1

I can not imagine a worse hell than being forced to provide and support someone who is aging and steadily becoming more and more unattractive by the day, particularly when I myself look dam good and will continue to look dam good for at least another 30 years or so. If you want to have sons, you have to tolerate female companionship. It's a social contract. You're not with her 24/7 anyways. In the "West" a large chunk of your income is stolen through taxes and given to women anyways. You support…
/r/TheRedPill19/09/15 09:52 PM
0

You need to work on breaking your inner mangina.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/15 01:01 PM
0

It seems this is what modern society produces. Career women and beta men. The future doesn't look bright. It's only natural. Evolution doesn't care about "fairness". The weak shall parish. Your ex will likely slut her way into late adulthood, not having children at all, perhaps one if baby rabies kick in. The weak beta men will get cucked, or pay for another man's kid. In the grand scale of things that behavior is aberrant (as we all know deep inside, despite the brainwashing), and both will be …
/r/TheRedPill12/09/15 08:48 PM
0

No there are not. It doesn't matter that their average citizen's life is shit right now. Every one of those countries will increase its population 3-5x times by the end of this century. That's the only thing that matters in the long run. Why? Because there is no going back to the "winner takes all" wars. Of course, for an individual it sucks to live there. But when we're dealing from the perspective of a society/nation, those are flourishing.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/15 07:53 PM
0

It's not a biography, but a dumb self-portrait of a dumb self-centered whore.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/15 09:55 PM
0

They seem pretty high to me. The only "rich" country with low divorce rate is Italy, most likely because the southern part brings down the average which is Western-Europe style high in the richer north. By that definition sub-Saharan countries are the healthiest societies in the world. They are, and that pains me. Milking technology and aid from the richer countries and out-breeding them. In a few centuries they will constitute 90% of humans.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/15 09:26 AM
0

But that's wrong. The American-type divorce rape is not something so prevalent in Europe. In Eastern Europe no, but the divorce rates are equally high. The only valid measure of society's health is birth rates. The rest doesn't matter in the long run.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/15 09:19 AM
0

The difference is, divorce in the West is a code word for "free stuff" and "CC 2.0", while the divorce in Russia means "fuck this bitch, I'm getting drunk". Divorced women in Russia crave for a reliable BB, while divorced women in the West crave for AF. Life in Russia has always been about survival. Personally I'm in favor of more unregulated narcotics, alcoholism and letting people screw up their lives on their own. It enhances filtering of the weak bloodlines (something that America does well …
/r/TheRedPill08/09/15 08:57 AM
-4

No, it's because she's mentally completely unable to put herself into other people's shoes.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/15 08:20 AM
-1

GDP numbers mean nothing when your culture, social institutions and people degenerate. Compared to what's going on in most of the Western countries, just maintaining the status quo translates into progress.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/15 02:47 AM
2

What is terrifying about the mouse utopia experiment, is that it played out in mere five generations. If you take the industrial revolution as a starting point and extrapolate the span to human generations, were nearing the end in 20-30 years at best. Some societies that started earlier are already in final stages.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/15 02:29 AM
-9

Me me me. There is not a single sentence without the first-person pronoun. Solipsistic bitch that wrote that essay solely to feel good about herself.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/15 10:26 PM
0

This is the correct thinking. Regardless of what path you take, death awaits us all. Therefore, all paths are equally meaningless, but only if you consciously take them.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/15 03:15 AM
0

No one should commit to a slut. We need to breed them out of the gene pool.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/15 12:54 PM
0

The lack of inherent conflict between men and women is an abnormality in evolutionary terms. Evolution progresses based on a conflict. "War is good for the economy" could be paraphrased as "Gender conflict is good for the family". Once that conflict is eliminated, the evolutionary dialectic is lost and such abnormality is considered a dead end which is resolved through self-willing but unconscious termination. Meaning: less reproduction. Chicks which ignore apparently high SMV men will still dig…
/r/TheRedPill24/08/15 10:08 PM
2

It is. On the meaning of the word from Wikipedia: The word eugenics is derived from the Greek word eu ("good" or "well") and the suffix -genēs ("born"), and was coined by Galton in 1883 to replace the word "stirpiculture", which he had used previously but which had come to be mocked due to its perceived sexual overtones.[54] Galton defined eugenics as "the study of all agencies under human control which can improve or impair the racial quality of future generations".[55] Forced eugenics which di…
/r/TheRedPill23/08/15 12:44 AM
0

Society as an imaginary grouping of people can go extinct, when there is no people to constitute it. Since it's imaginary, based on arbitrary criteria, it doesn't really "exist".
/r/TheRedPill22/08/15 07:21 PM
1

The social policies itself are subject to evolutionary pressures. Society doesn't exist as such, it's a fictional construct to drive group evolution. The so-called social Darwinism is just a large-scale manifestation of low-level interplay. If a society enacts a policy that is detrimental to evolutionary goals, that society is deemed to extinction, which is what is going on with the so-called West.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/15 04:02 PM
3

It's an evolutionary imperative. Evolution itself is a form of eugenics. It will come about one way or another, knowingly or unknowingly. Alpha/beta dynamics is also eugenics at play.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/15 03:34 PM
4

Singapore's fertility rate is 1.2. No amount of social engineering will fix that. They are fucked.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/15 02:25 PM
2

There is nothing bad with eugenics if it is voluntary. Everyone has a chance. You decided to screw up your body and life prospects for 30-40 years? Too bad, no kids for you. If we sterilized everyone at birth and "gamified" the human existence and reproduction, will would unleash productivity unmatched in history. No more homeless, abortions, broken families etc. Divorce should also be illegal until all kids reach the age of 18.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/15 02:23 PM
0

It works on Windows 10, at least the portable version does.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/15 01:54 PM
0

Brain Workshop works on Windows XP, Windows Vista, Mac OS X and Linux. See the download page.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/15 01:30 PM
1

To increase fluid intelligence try Brain Workshop. As opposed to lifting, the effect is permanent. It will also improve your memory and REM sleep. FAQ & testimonies. To increase retention use a spaced repetition software like Anki. It will autoschedule daily "exercises" which you can take on your cell phone during the myriad of time-wasting occasions during the day.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/15 01:38 AM
-1

I'm saying she is fit to be a leader and your "Merkel, being a woman, is too incompetent for such long-term planning." is just misogynistic bullshit. It's not BS it's a fact corroborated by history. There is nothing wrong in thinking of women as a gender as inferior, because that's what they are. They are not evolved to be leaders, it's unnatural. You can calibrate the degeneracy of a nation by its embrace of feminism, and appointment of women as ministers of defense and commanders in chief. Jus…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/15 10:40 PM
4

she is a competent political leader that acts based on logical thinking She is not competent. She is not even fit. All of her important decisions are ruinous in the long term. She's a typical short-term thinking woman. Logic is secondary to the strength of will and commitment in leadership. Comparing Merkel to the most unpopular president in the history of Fifth Republic is not a comparative advantage. Hollande is a beta bitch politician not a statesman. What exactly did Merkel did right? What w…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/15 10:34 PM
2

Germany doesn't rule itself, it was in an economical slump before Merkel and is now the economical motor behind the EU. That is not due to Merkel, but her predecessor Schröder and his Agenda 2010 policies which increased competitiveness of the German industry (and fucked the middle class). Merkel, being a woman, is too incompetent for such long-term planning. This is evident from her idiotic mismanagement of the Greek debt crisis and the coup in Ukraine ("let's wait and see what happens"), as we…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/15 10:24 PM
8

Then there is Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany that is doing a damn good job at her position. No she isn't. She's ruining both Germany and Europe in the long term by catering to short-term policies that please the electorate. Her surname has become a word for "doing nothing" in youth slang. She's nothing compared to male leaders of Germany in the past. Germany is doing well because it's a machine by itself, despite her awful leadership not because of it. Women are unfit for the type of pragm…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/15 10:14 PM
0

It's called "the global political awakening". The cat is out of the bag now, and no amount of institutional brainwashing can reverse the momentum.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 02:37 AM
2

25 sentences in the article, containing 21 'I's, 5 'me's and 13 'my's. Solipsism factor = 1,56.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 11:05 PM
8

Hamster can run in both directions simultaneously.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/15 01:06 AM
0

They have actually. Sources or GTFO. they're sickly and weak and have the highest rate of allergies, psychological problems, and chronic illnesses. Physical and mental fitness are two different and separate categories. We're talking about general intelligence here, not bodily features. Of course inbreeding and group selection will worsen you physically.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 10:26 AM
-1

No they haven't. There is a gradual rise in IQ even within subspecies ("races") as you go along the geographic latitude - e.g. northern Europeans are on average a bit smarter than southerner Europeans, Japanese and Chinese are a bit smarter than Southeast Asians etc. The harshness of the environment filters out the weak. That's also the reason why the Jews are so smart - they've been persecuted for centuries but never completely obliterated, which caused the weak-willed and less adaptable (i.e. …
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 09:08 AM
2

I think the reasons are more pragmatic - shifting the financial burden from to the father from the government. They don't want the child to starve so somebody has to pay. All old Indo-European peoples had this mindset. The culture was all about the continuation of the bloodline through sons. It was lost in the modernity with the advent of the collectivist degeneracy. Africa had abundant food and nice climate, so it never went though IQ filters like the northerner civilizations, which created pat…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 02:39 AM
11

i honestly never understood this - to me, this is nothing but white knighting. why the fuck would i care about children i didn`t want in the first place, just because they originate from my sperm? In the Roman Empire child didn't legally exist until the father accepted it. Women could get pregnant and cuckold all they wanted - but if a man didn't want or accept the child as his own, it was as good as an orphan. He could also legally disown them and sell them into slavery if they irritated him.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 10:11 PM
6

2xcromo The top five posts literally have "I" or "me" in the title, lol. What better evidence for female solipsism does one need.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 11:21 AM
1

Related read: Evolution of the Soviet family. Notice how they first tried full-scale feminism and reverted back to the nuclear family.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/15 11:34 PM
5

You can benchmark female solipsism by usage of the first-person pronoun.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/15 01:20 PM
1

You and your genes are two separate things. It's really a false dichotomy. Unless you find a way to mind-upload your consciousness into a physical substrate other than your own biological body, you're still serving genes - just not your genes. It's the genes of other men and women who will leech onto your productivity and take away your money to sustain themselves. A single childless man is taxed more than a man in any other social combination. By the time you die you will have paid millions int…
/r/TheRedPill24/05/15 08:36 PM
0

how's it working out for Russia? No NATO in Ukraine, it's all good. Ruble has lost a ton of its worth, oil is down Both have rebounded. According to apocalyptic predictions Russia should be in a massive recession by now, but that is not the case. Developing economies are much less affected with economic distress because stakes are much lower in preserving the status quo. Putin has zero goodwill and is a zombie, AND he hasn't won a year later. Worthless ad-hominems. You're a retard. my point is i…
/r/TheRedPill24/05/15 08:06 PM
0

Ukraine is a soverign country What good is the sovereignty if you can't enforce it? The so-called sovereign countries forget that they only exist on paper because of the mercy of the great powers.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/15 01:07 PM
-1

all the other first worlds are racist as hell haha. It doesn't matter which sentiments the population harbors. They're still be swamped by immigrants. EU has open borders internally. The rest of anglosphere is also immigration friendly. Seeing how many wars the U.S. had gotten in for oil alone, I highly doubt Africa has much of a chance of "invading". There are no more wars for oil, and there will never be. Populations don't want it. There will be no more Bushes at the helm. The most who profit …
/r/TheRedPill17/05/15 07:56 PM
-1

There are no more traditional wars. What is left is cultural/memetic wars that are purely demographic in nature. Natives have abysmal birth rates and will within few generations be ousted by invaders. Nigeria alone will by the end of the century have a billion people, more than twice as much as European Union. As we speak hundreds of black Muslim men ages 15-35 are invading Europe each day. When your president, the supreme commander of the armed forces, is elected as a member of a non-native cul…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/15 06:55 PM
0

In the big scheme of things there is this thing called democracy, where one human = one vote. The reproductive barriers were erected by people and cultures who are willingly or unwillingly pushing themselves to extinction, and which are in absolute numbers just a tiny fraction of the species. Overall the mankind is growing in numbers and will not be peaking out this century. What will happen is that anti-family cultures (those supportive of feminism in any form) will go extinct, either voted out…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/15 09:32 AM
0

Only if you're on the dole - no thanks. No - you get various tax breaks, govt-subsidized parental leaves as well as additional income in form of child benefits. Where I come from the breakeven point of tax paid/money received is 4 kids. TFR goes hand in hand with the economy. The only way to make people have more kids, is to make having more kids worthwhile It correlates but is not the reason. The poorest countries have the largest TFR, while the richest societies are fertility-negative. The poo…
/r/TheRedPill03/05/15 09:16 AM
0

Your quote is, if anything, supportive of my statement. What I was referring to is the era of wars, food scarcity and abysmal living conditions. Today you get paid just for having kids.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/15 08:49 AM
0

It's hard, but those kind of issues are trivial when compared to issues that grand-(grand-)parents generations faced, when having half a dozen kids. And the situation in the US was waaay better than in e.g. Europe at those times. Yes it would be expensive and hard - but children themselves are human capital, and if properly parented in the early years can overcome most of these problems on their own. Ultimately it boils down to human selfishness - people don't want to be perceived as a religious…
/r/TheRedPill03/05/15 08:22 AM
0

In other words, the so called "natural hierarchy" is a vestige of a long gone era, superseded by technology which turned the planet into a global village and eliminated the need for charm as a survival strategy. Personally, I'd trade my freedom as a man for the shackles of "natural hierarchy" and all that jazz. The tribe doesn't exist anymore, except if I decide to make out of my own selfish needs.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 10:00 PM
0

Yup. The rate of TFR decline since 2007 is quite shocking. It should also be noted that TFR has been below replacement rate since 1971, except for Hispanic mothers.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 09:44 PM
0

The health of an economy does not depend on the number of people participating in it. Govt prints money and steals it through taxing, doling it out to consumers. Consumers create more aggregate demand, growing businesses that make more profit or employ more people, growing the overall economy and filling the govt coffers with even more money. It's a Ponzi scheme yes, but the health of that Ponzi scheme is dependent on the ever growing absolute number of participants, regardless whether they are …
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 11:59 AM
1

These fat fucks will die young, leaving the social security for the few that actually take care of themselves. Nope, with the help of medical technology they can postpone their deaths for a very long time. And that technology is growing increasingly more expensive, taking an ever greater chunk of your income. All things considered, you'll and up paying for them more and more as the technology improves.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 10:54 AM
5

the last time i checked america was one of the few white nations with a birth rate of 2.1 Nope, it's 1.87 now, below replacement. For whites it's even lower. That's why over in europe the muslim populations are far greater and sadly britain and europe has to deal with sjws and muslims. 25% of children born in France are to first-generation non-European immigrants, almost entirely Muslim. It's a disaster in the making. If i could find someone worth wifing and had oodles of spare cash laying aroun…
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 10:40 AM
2

For that kind of money you can hire a small army to get rid of her. Stealthily and permanently. Hell, I know guys that would suicide-bomb her for a fraction of that on their life insurance.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 10:04 AM
6

It's important to realize that from the evolutionary perspective it's beneficial for them not to be able to understand their own behavior. If they did, they could've screwed up behavioral patterns that took millions of years to evolve in try-or-die scenarios by simple self-reflection, or sufficiently strong social conditioning. The resistance is so strong because it's literally the matter of the survival of the species. Those who didn't behave like that never made it in the gene pool. The entire…
/r/TheRedPill26/04/15 09:00 PM
0

but his government is a strong-willed force for evil Putin is the first and foremost a Russian nationalist. His government acts to ensure the prosperity of Russia, even if it means incurring some short-term negatives. That's the nature of politics.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/15 12:23 PM
0

Women are not the active agents of evolution, men are. It is advantageous for us that the feminist career-driven types of women grow extinct, and are replaced by feminine types that are more conducive to fulfilling their biologically programmed role.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/15 12:13 PM
3

Russia is offering a couple thousand for having a child, $450/month to raise the child, and 40% of their previous salary to stay at home and raise the child, and yet Russian women are not having children. Russian TFR has been steadily increasing for the last decade, ever since pro-fertility policies were put in place by Putin. TFR is rapidly converging with that of US, and crude birth rate is even better. TFR reflects genuine movement in childbearing patterns, not merely if there are proportiona…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 08:54 PM
2

It won't since it has no culture to bind the population, which will cause its disintegration the moment shit hit the fan, since no one will be willing to die for the ideal of a non-existing nation. Statesmanship is not about the gdp per capita but conquering and setting the foundations for long-term survival, creating and directing ideologies along the way. At best Singapore will end up like Luxemburg or Qatar, but given its unfavorable geographical position, demographic composition and a limite…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/15 11:15 PM
4

Whatever LKY accomplished doesn't matter in the long run. With the TFR of 0.78 Singapore can at best be described as an IQ shredder. Funny that he made that remark to that woman - she had at most a single child, if any at all. In the long run, demographics is all that matters. Singapore will grow even more wealthy than it is now, and it's just a matter of time before hundreds of millions poor fucks surrounding it start demanding their "fair share" via some global institution. All that prosperity…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/15 06:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter