TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

lallen Archive

View 0 posts and 9 comments by lallen on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

OK I had to get off my phone and do this more properly. The unnecessary surgery I'm talking about is not because the hospitals I work at haven't been following european or international guidelines, but just the fact that the NNT of RALP/RRP to prevent a death is variable depending on the risk assessment of the cancer. Even for the most high risk cancer types, we are talking about a NNT of 13. In layman's terms (you probably understand the term but man in the thread don't) that means you have to …
/r/MensRights01/12/19 08:18 AM
0

I know it is a blood test. If it is elevated enough or if there is doubt, a biopsy is done. If a biopsy finds cancerous cells surgery is often done, which is often unnecessary. I am a consultant anaesthesist, i treat these patients when they come in for unnecessary procedures. What is your qualification?
/r/MensRights01/12/19 07:37 AM
0

Yes, and there is a 98% chance that they would have been fine without the operation
/r/MensRights01/12/19 12:20 AM
3

I can agree with those points! It is just not a good tool for general population screening
/r/MensRights30/11/19 08:12 PM
2

RALP is likely way overstated in its benefits compared to RRP. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4220385/ "RALP appears to provide beneficial potency rates compared with RRP; however, these effects are most pronounced at high-volume centers with experienced surgeons" so at best a slight improvement if you happen to have surgery at the right centre. Additionaly it is not correct that "prostate cancer is a slowly growing cancer". It can be, but that is not the type that kills you. The p…
/r/MensRights30/11/19 06:43 PM
-3

They are not as actively harmful as unnecessary workup and treatment from an elevated PSA. Check out https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jpd9HavqMiI for a Quick summary, or check out uptodate for more details. Wether or not screening is actually useful at all to reduce mortality is debated. If it is (one study showed a relative reduction of 20%) it came at a NNT of 50. That is a LOT of impotent and/or incontinent men Who would have been fine without any screening. I am a man and a doctor. I will not g…
/r/MensRights30/11/19 06:30 PM
-6

PSA screening doesn't help you live
/r/MensRights30/11/19 05:57 PM
-17

The PSA test is pretty worthless, the medical community seems to get to a consensus that it should not be used as a routine screening tool. Until something better is discovered (and documented with higher specifity and sensitivity) it makes sense to decrease the use of testing
/r/MensRights30/11/19 05:56 PM
14

It says in norwegian "Oslo tingrett mener det 91 minutter lange lydopptaket viser at det ikke fant sted noen voldtekt, og at fornærmede utvilsomt ga en uriktig forklaring i anmeldelsen." I don't know why the translation is way off. The correct translation would be: "Oslo district court finds that the 91-minute audio recording shows that there was no rape, and that the plaintiff undoubtedly gave an inncorrect explanation in her lodgment"
/r/PussyPassDenied20/11/14 04:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter