TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

lampishthing Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by lampishthing on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

The thing is that women sometimes sit down without looking because they're used to female only bathrooms. In the case that the lid is down this is kind of funny but a little gross. In the case where the seat is up this is way gross.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/19 08:21 AM
38

Yeah hairpulling is not a go to guy move.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/18 08:57 AM

Both should be unisex, one sign is man/woman the other is woman/man.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 01:37 PM

Women go to the toilet more frequently and (I think) take longer? A fairer solution would be all unisex toilets with a gender preference.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 01:36 PM
8

He links a HuffPo article from 2013 that compares medians and uses this as the headline. In the same article it mentions a study that controls for other factors (as if this concept was crazy) which says a more correct measure of the gap is 1/3 of that stated. Wilful frickin ignorance.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 08:46 PM
5

Yeah, the first time I came here there was a great feeling of validation when I found posts about father's rights. Before that I'd never really felt it was ok to articulate that I thought family courts were sexist in design and outcomes.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 06:16 PM
8

Try rephrasing it. Something like 'do you think men should be able to opt out of parenthood?' And clarify a bit in the text. And put a [serious] tag on it. Mod removal seems a bit reactionary but it does sound like you are advocating a position for the sake of furthering it rather than being interested in people's answers.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 01:01 PM
3

I must disagree. He was right in following through on his threat but he should have gone with 'pick somewhere else or we're getting salads' instead of giving him nothing. I say this solely because of the context of the divorce. You have to be soooo careful. I don't believe for a second that that psychologist thinks he's "wholly unfit" - the bitch is just trying to get paid the most she can.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 11:59 AM
10

This guy was being a fucking creep by the sounds of it. If a woman was doing this to a man I'd call her a fucking creep too. This is not a men's rights issue. This is a nanny state issue, if anything at all.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 01:54 PM
15

In Ireland you can do her for defamation as well. It's what happens if someone gets incorrectly accused of shoplifting (even if only for a matter of seconds). Typical payout is about €12, 000.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 06:29 PM
1

I was more worried about the poor driver, to be honest.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 12:28 PM
11

I would definitely agree with this. You need to clear the air with your boss and make it absolutely clear that you would have done the same for a man. I would leave out the "one of two..." paragraph though. Never give ammunition.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 03:36 PM
5

Damn those sexy white guys.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 03:27 PM
15

Maybe, but rather convenient as I wouldn't have had to alter my commute.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 03:25 PM
7

Death by jumping in front of a train is fairly popular. Considered it myself years ago. (No such issues now.)
/r/MensRights30/08/13 02:59 PM
2

My point is that if you're a housespouse then homekeeping is your work. So a househusband who dies dropping his kids to school, if that is exclusively his responsibility, is as validly a work-related death as a woman who gets killed driving between offices. I'm just trying to point out that the data is inherently skewed to a certain extent and that that should be acknowledged. That said, I sincerely doubt including these figures would overpower the current result.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 12:32 PM
2

A lot of people will say "meh" to 124 deaths in an entire year. Compare this to cancers and the terrifying numbers presented in the news and ads for charities.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 10:43 AM
1

I went through the data the guy got his numbers from (it seemed high to me) and he's a little off but not enough to matter. 128 worker deaths, 123 men and 4 women. so 96.9% :P Interestingly the "member of public" deaths are 37m, 24f - much more even split. One thing I would like to point out is that housewives and househusbands are not included in these statistics. If you want to make the argument about there being no wage gap because of women choosing family over careers then I think it is nece…
/r/MensRights05/07/13 10:41 AM
0

That sounds like a leap. Does the 2007 study say that the higher earning women are being paid more than men?
/r/MensRights10/05/13 05:22 PM
1

Yes, any description of another person's thought processes is hypothetical but the language used when referring to them is important as it can connote evidence which is not there. That pisses off people who legitimately disagree with you like our Jesuit friend up there. You're making an assertion about jj's thoughts with no concrete basis and you're passing it off as an obvious truth. It is not an obvious truth. If it was people wouldn't be disagreeing with you! It's probably true but that's not…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 09:44 PM
1

I think that if you are going to argue the fairness of your views on an equality issue then you should either i) not assume anyone's thought process or ii) highlight that said thought process is hypothetical. Even that's a bit dodge. I'm not saying the assumption was wrong but I am definitely saying that the "Judge's" actions did not definitively indicate that she thought the woman's claims were "bullshit". She could very well have considered the claim possible but beyond the scope of the presen…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:20 PM
1

My hat is off to Judge Judy for not believing this allegation without proof, and speaking up when the father was effectively bound and gagged by custom and law from speaking.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 07:01 PM
2

To be be fair to Mr. MyAccountIsASaint in your post you said "I think... I think... seeing through all the bullshit..." With the last part you dropped the possibility of speculation that the abuse happened and thus fall into your own criticism. That said, it looks like there's only a petty difference between ye. It is waaay too easy to argue on the internet.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter