TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

larryjack Archive

View 0 posts and 69 comments by larryjack on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

You guard is high because of a lot of trolling here I guess. My fault of using that term and not explaining correctly. Not at all. Just a suggestion. Absolutely, already avoid what I don't need to be repeatedly exposed to. Take my comment for what it is, just my opinion.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/17 06:43 PM
4

Why don't compartmentalize the hate in a related sub instead of a flair? All feminism, rape marriage, paternity fraud, western culture fall, etc. goes there. Yes, unfortunately it would be another burden to moderate. Sometime, all this negativity is too much and somehow annoying, and perhaps not that healthy for the mind on the long term. Yes, these things exist, and men must be aware of them, but apart complaining and being aware, there's so much a post on a web forum can do.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/17 06:25 PM
1

Most men today are lost because what is shown to them is only carefully filtered data. If they only see the "Hollywood" way and no other way, how can they possibly think about treating women like they should be treated (red)?
/r/TheRedPill26/12/16 03:48 PM
3

And why almost nobody does this? It seems so mundane, so simple, there must be something else too.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/16 03:45 PM
3

Killing marriage is part of the plan. There are many interlaced implications, which some of them are: less power to the people since they're more divided (the bigger the group the bigger its power, a one-person group has less power) less power to people also means they are more easily controlled less children of the demographic attacked by the killing of marriage Add Open Borders and Welfare to that and in a few generations you can see where it goes. A mixed and impure race, that's gonna happen.…
/r/TheRedPill18/12/16 08:05 AM
11

Thanks for the post, I liked it. Your father is right, and he expressed it very eloquently. I somehow got to the same conclusion, expressing it in this way: Give them the opportunity to cheat you easily, for a small price. If they cheat you for that little, that's how much they value themselves, hence they're worthless. But your father said it better: you're paying to know their true character. On a Machiavellian perspective, you can use this technique when you do want to initialize an attack bu…
/r/TheRedPill15/12/16 06:50 PM
5

You should also see it from the macro point of view. The 60-80% will always exist, it is the group of the Lesser Men, but if they fail too much shit tests and they devaluate too much their value, the value of all the Men as a group will decrease, which mean the power as a group of Women will increase. You can be all the alpha you want, but men just want a submissive woman who gives blowjobs at order and shut her mouth up when he says so. If Women's power increases too much, the bargain will tend…
/r/TheRedPill15/12/16 03:17 PM
1

Yeah, good to know. The next step of understanding a truth is to use it for your purposes (right, that's what most lack in their life). People don't give a f-ck about you, indeed, in the sense you're saying here. There's only two ways, though, for people to care about you: They gain something if they care. They lose something if they don't. It's about bargains. You have a purpose, you need to achieve it. You need to use people, you need to give people something for them to give something back. Y…
/r/TheRedPill15/12/16 03:05 PM
1

What do you need answers for?
/r/TheRedPill04/12/16 12:08 AM
1

As a general and useful rule, if something happens, even if it seems to "just happen", it is convenient to ask "qui bono?"
/r/TheRedPill03/12/16 07:12 PM
1

What do you think about race? It is such a hot topic and mostly a tabu and a loaded topic that might raise some questions. For the sake of argument, if we suppose race is a valid way to categorize humans on hearth, wouldn't it be convenient to make it believe like it is not? It is the exact same thing happening with The Blue Pill and The Red Pill view of the world. If you know something to be true, would't it be convenient that some other people (perhaps a lot of them) believe the actual opposit…
/r/TheRedPill03/12/16 07:11 PM
2

I don't know why you're getting downvoted. Used the word 'group' because it is neutral and not loaded like the word 'race', which can too easily trigger emotional responses. One of the problem that are encountered in explaining these things is that people see things from their point of view, plus even if one is open minded it is difficult to see a point of view which by default is not overtly portrayed publicly. Obviously, if you are part of the more potent group you want things to stay that way…
/r/TheRedPill03/12/16 07:05 PM
1

'Bad' or 'good' are perspectives. How would you conquer a nation? It's either through quick brute force, or long and steady subtle moves. The problem with the former is that it's easier to combat because it's easy to see what is causing the changes. The latter is effective because due to the longevity of the process a multitude of other reasons for the changes that must be made in effect can be injected together with the real reasons. The effect will be: there is no way to precisely tell what is…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/16 10:55 PM
5

Depopulation is part of the goal. First, every group must be made equal. Empowering minorities, and depowering the most powerful group. Divided people are easier to control. Just wait some decades.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/16 09:48 PM
1

There is no excuse for not taking action right now It's a full paradigm shift. Once you get it you will actually need to find excuses to justify your planned actions.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/16 08:30 PM
1

Are you an employer or an employee?
/r/TheRedPill06/11/16 03:38 PM
1

If "no one cares" and it's "just a form of putting a mental concept into words" why not use less esoteric and metaphyscical terms? That's exactly one of the infinite manifestations of Game. You want to 'bend reality' by making other people do what you want them to do. You are basically saying that you want that OP changes his way of doing, in the actual case you want him to change how it puts mental concepts into words. And you are doing it by asking it. Game needs to be described in abstract te…
/r/TheRedPill06/11/16 03:14 PM
1

To convince of what actually? The 'what' is one and only. How you do it, the actual implementation is what makes the difference. Why do you care about metaphysical woo woos? It's just a form of putting into words a mental concept made by a specific person, I mean who cares. Do you have any additional examples? So you believe that creating a global company, or a successful dynasty or giving zero money, close to zero time and attention and have plenty of sex are pretty much mundane stuff that peop…
/r/TheRedPill06/11/16 02:44 PM
1

Give 10 meaningful and different examples of "bending reality". Creating a product and make other people buy it Making women want to fuck you Also, every kind of negotiation, you are an investor, you decide to back a company, you want as much ownership as you can obtain for as little money as needed to maximally grow the company and to make the founders work hard for it have maximum amount of sex for as little as commitment and time and money as possible Stopping others from taking control over …
/r/TheRedPill06/11/16 02:05 PM
1

OUR concept of game is m-f interaction, flirting. YOUR concept of game is some esoteric, metaphysical and pseudoscientific babble If I influence someone to do something it's hardly "bending the reality". It's called persuasion, marketing, advertising etc. There is nothing metaphysical here. It seems esoteric and metaphysical because it has perhaps infinite applications. It is convenient to use abstract terms to describe it. M-f interactions are just one kind of interaction a person can engage in…
/r/TheRedPill05/11/16 05:49 PM
1

What would be the end goal after full centralized control is obtained?
/r/TheRedPill25/10/16 02:50 PM
26

Good efficient method. I think one key takeaway is to never buy into the sour grapes rationalization that "you pay for sex one way or another" by so many Blue Pill guys here. You're paying with the effort of building something they (women) want: abs (excellent physique) and good sex. There is no way to not pay. But a Man can choose the currency of the transaction. Women can't, their currency is only sex. (Special case: they're needed to raise offspring.) Low value men (betas) pay with kindness, …
/r/TheRedPill25/10/16 12:56 PM
1

Personalized teaching, of course it works. The Teacher Figure will decide what to teach and he will carefully choose what to teach as to ultimately provide benefits to him. Older family components teaching younger ones? They will teach the younger ones what they need to know as to benefit the family. Mainstream education system teaching millions of children? It will teach them what they need to know as to benefit the system. If I'd be the System I'd try to make parents so busy and so "I just wan…
/r/TheRedPill15/10/16 07:06 PM
6

They? Do you mean the Elite, the Masons, the Illuminati, or the Reptilians?
/r/TheRedPill15/10/16 04:47 PM
4

TRP advocates stoicism, therefore acknowledge what you can change and what you cannot then take advantage of it, otherwise why knowing things if you don't use the knowledge? Are you (reader of this, not just OP) scared society is going in a direction you don't like it to go? Do you have the power to change its direction? If no, read as much as you need but then go on with your shit. As a side note, a strategy of some people is to just spread the knowledge, waiting and hoping someone else will ch…
/r/TheRedPill15/10/16 04:32 PM
3

You're talking about: How to become God. It's all the same shit again: Increase the Delta. Either increase the power of a group of Humans, making them Super-Humans (Gods) among the rest of Humans Or, decrease other Humans' power, making them Sub-Humans, so that the group of Humans will be Gods among the Sub-Humans. (1) is more difficult to implement than (2).
/r/TheRedPill07/10/16 03:57 PM
3

You own the means of production. You use them to create the tangible product. You sell the product. It's about the cost and the means of acquiring the means of production which I hide and then I steer your attention toward fictitious means. You got what you need nonetheless, but you didn't got what you didn't know you needed. Never said it applies to the OP.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/16 05:59 PM
9

To all the people out there who needs a method to make money: Find the target market (people that share a common problem) Give high detailed step-by-step descriptions to obtain a result that solves the problem Just lay out the necessary theory to explain the steps in the description (Possibly heighten enthusiasm, it won't be difficult since you're solving their problem) But never give them the seeds to plant the tree, only sell them the fruits. So when they finish the fruits they will come back …
/r/TheRedPill30/09/16 05:23 PM
13

Her: I want us to get serious You: Body language mimicking a serious posture (subtextually mocking her) Her: I want us to get serious (Bad) Him: I don’t want a serious relationship because I want other people too (Better) Him: I am not ready for a serious relationship yet (Best) Him: I cannot get into a serious relationship because... In every answer you give you adopt the same word she used ('serious'), essentially entering her frame. The 1st rule of Frame is: just because someone asked you a q…
/r/TheRedPill28/09/16 09:36 PM
1

Well put. This will be understood only by those who already know. For them, it is assumed, hence no need to talk about it. For the rest, you call it point of the iceberg, I'd like to visualize superficial knowledge as leaves of a tree. As someone who eats some 48 leaves from the tree, he will never grasp the seed that will make him create the tree.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/16 05:02 PM
13

The main characteristic of Power Talk is that you have a clear agenda to achieve. The game is then played as: You need to understand the agenda of the other person (cognitive empathy is one of the tools) You need to push your agenda without leaking information about your agenda and at the same time, you need to extract information from the other part without making it appear like you're trying to extract information about his agenda The next layer is: since the other part is also trying to extra…
/r/TheRedPill25/09/16 08:14 PM
61

One can say anything he wants, but the fact that you spent time with her remains. Women can say many bullshits, but they ruthlessly notice the facts. The problem is that you actually have spent time with her, that implies you are interested in spending time with her, which implies you don't have better options, and yet, you didn't fuck her. The transaction is between time (attention given) and sex. The more valuable your time and attention is the quicker you get the sex. Betas' time value is inf…
/r/TheRedPill25/09/16 08:40 AM
1

Language control is a very useful tool. It is somehow an art. Not everyone is capable to do it. And most are also not capable to see it as what it is: a twisted mind control tool.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/16 09:12 PM
2

At some levels it is safer to assume everybody is DT and trying to find evidences for the contrary. Until then, DT they remain.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/16 05:47 AM
6

Dichotomic thinking is not useful in this case. It's about tendencies. There will be always someone more alpha and someone more beta. Men work in hierarchical systems. See also: contextual power. In some hierarchies you are at the top, in some others you are under someone else. But your inherent 'alphaness' remains the same. And on the long run, your 'alphaness' will decree in how many hierarchies you are at the top, and in how many you are not. Examples? You work for someone else, but you comma…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 02:19 PM
30

Eugenics and social engineering are needed to combat eugenics and social engineering. 3 years are nothing. Plans for generations. One must have full control on what goes into his body and mind. But first, one must acknowledge that such control can be exerted. Doable but not feasible for everybody since they have to worry about practical things such as: pay the bills, shit at work, keep the bitch quiet, buy the next shit, or they just don't care.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 11:51 AM
1

That's obvious. Women are women. You cannot change humans' natural tendencies. What you can change is how the behavior is seen in society and culture. If there is little to none consequences for a behavior that benefits me or my group but damages others or other groups, do you think I will not take the opportunity to engage in that behavior? Carrots and sticks are needed to control. Carrots for humans' tendencies are provides by Nature you eat the sweet, 'Nature' has provides you a system that r…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 11:37 AM
6

When does an embryo become a child? When does a boiling frog become a dead frog? If there was a switch point it will be easy to predict it and avoid it. Slow, tiny changes are much less likely to be perceived as such.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 09:17 AM
1

Truth never changes so my words can change but the core ideas don't. That's why I wrote "your choice of words". By what you state in your writings, your goal is to increase awareness. Is that correct or am I misunderstanding? Your choice of words is peculiar. You usually describe entities such Game, or Frame, or 777, etc. It seems you avoid describing the process under such nominalizations. And, since 'you goal' as stated before, it seems strange, because the first thing I will do if I wanted to…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/16 06:35 PM
-1

It's interesting to note your repetitiveness. Fact: repetitiveness works. Ironically, your choice of words has the effect of being un-understandable by those who perhaps need them the most. Your goal is to higher awareness. But understanding is also a function of mental capabilities. I guess you just shrug about it.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/16 03:40 PM
1

It's about information exchange. You seek out info that are as close as possible to the real state of things. Yes, people respond truthfully, but that's only one aspect of it. You must come to understand their intent without even having to ask. The truest the information you have the better your decisions will be. On your side instead, you must make think the "opponent" (very broad term) that he/she is acquiring true info when in fact they are not (a mix works better). In that way the decisions …
/r/TheRedPill16/09/16 12:55 PM
5

Control the Frame: Just because someone asked you a question it doesn't mean you ought to respond. Which it doesn't translate into "being an asshole because you don't answer." Do it with class and wit. See, for instance, how politicians do respond to a question but actually do not respond (do not trap themselves and do not provide the info the questioner asked). I'm not saying talk like politicians either. It's about Frame. Frame is controlling what is talked about who gets the information and t…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/16 10:37 AM
3

People (most of them) don't really care about putting energies, time and effort into planning and meta programming themselves. (Won't even pass in their mind to program others, we could add.) They are happy with being given something they can immediately see that works, which also depends on their capability of elaborating the content (if it's higher than their capabilities they won't accept it (get it)). As much as it is important to seek out the info you are trying to acquire through a researc…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/16 10:19 AM
0

You're just talking about numbers and you are implying that since your calculations the the value of a man is such and such and the value of a woman is such and such. Value is in the eye of the buyer. It is not written on stones. Value of pussy these days has been increased (for the betas) because these days to buy pussy a beta will provide but then there is also the risk he will lose much more in case of divorce. Also, the buyer's (the beta) control of his currency (to provide) has been decreas…
/r/TheRedPill12/09/16 04:50 PM
2

Problem is: it's a high level concept and if you describe it in high level terms, most of the people won't get it. They need examples, manifestations of the concept to be able to grasp it. Being a "receiver" and never a "giver" is just another way of saying "someone who does not have Frame and Game". He who has Game can "go around the world" and give. Not in the charity sense, but to create something and make it use by others, which is basically "Spreading your Will" or similarly "Spreading your…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/16 07:44 AM
3

If there are two or more groups of people and one or more is able to subdue one or other groups, whose fault is? If it works, it works. If some groups are able to dumb others down it is because they are good enough to think and implement a plan to make it happen, and the subdued groups are gullible enough to fall to that plan. Easy as that. If the subdued group was better than it is, they wouldn't become subdued.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/16 07:14 AM
1

Ok It just seemed, at least to me, that your tone displayed too much panic. I mean, it is serious, but people don't need to be in panic.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 09:30 PM
3

It seems your ability to see how you appear in the eye of others is getting blurred. You want to spread your message but you're slowly decreasing your credibility.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 05:52 PM
1

So how do you explain to roaches that they can change/improve their way of act? You can't. Most of them see the manifestations and they can only work on that level, trying to find motives for the manifestations on the same plane of manifestations. Whereas motives, sources, lays on higher levels. And how to you avoid the higher levels to not take advantage of lower ones? Going even higher? The beauty of It is that It is independent from any explanation. Teach a point to see in 2D and you might ev…
/r/TheRedPill03/09/16 07:26 PM
0

The Red Pill seeks thed path "back" from mythology in order to reconnect with the Truth which is to rediscover creation. That's still a reactive process. But, it's necessary for the next one: being able to create and propagate your own creations upon others. If everybody push creations nobody consume. Flow of energy interrupted, and you don't want that. Boost it and boom it. Rise and repeat.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/16 05:39 PM
1

It's always a pleasant surprise to see how Game can be effective, isn't it. So astonishing to see a person who truly believes in something that will actually make him no better than he is. And I was also a believer of that book too. I perhaps understood why they cannot see. It's because they have actually never needed to push a real agenda upon others. How many of these people here had a need to implement something similar to "how can I make millions of people believe X?", or generally speaking …
/r/TheRedPill30/08/16 08:47 PM
1

Then you imagine you are god and actually control the universe and your own ego corrupts and blinds you... you stop seeing. Then, we should define god as also someone who cannot be corrupt by his own ego. Like, god is almighty and he made the universe. But if he's the almighty can he create a stone that not even himself can lift? It's about definitions, right? But before those definitions exist, there must be some entity who decides the definition. There's something that is there, I don't know w…
/r/TheRedPill30/08/16 08:16 PM
1

I had this sometimes happen. It's like activating a collective conscious. It's true. It happens to me too and it's clearly happening to others too. We are aware of things, and we breathe the same red air, so to say. It's like, when you physically frequent a specific place you bump into other people who are in that same place. There exist a mental level of things, apart the physical plane of manifestation. There must be a connection our mind can make, maybe we can predict future occurrences or th…
/r/TheRedPill30/08/16 08:02 PM
1

I don't know if I know it all. As for now, I know that perhaps Natural Laws are part of this great state of truthness about Reality. The fact is that they can be explained, they can be put into words. But there other parts which cannot be ever put into words. And who might know how many other parts there can be. DT might be an evolutionary response to that, where when in nature the laws get hidden, some humans develop certain mechanism to possess the same powers that others would have from the k…
/r/TheRedPill29/08/16 03:05 PM
1

I see what you mean. You talk about DT traits which describe human traits. I talk about a state of knowledge which lays outside humans. Absolutely, one who is not DT cannot acquire such traits. The DT traits die when the human dies. The Knowledge exists before the human is born and it will continue to exist after he dies. I talk about the knowledge of the state of "truthness" of Reality which can be potentially acquired by every human, but some humans can make it harder for other ones to acquire…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/16 07:51 PM
1

Mere knowledge is equal to no knowledge. But the capability to use the knowledge is dependent on some factors like: current power of the Knowledge Implemeter, and the current power of those the Impleter's actions will effect. The power of those effected also includes the knowledge about been able to know the intentions of the Implementer (which—ironically?, no reflexively—depends on the ability of the implementer to avoid the effected to know.) Have-Game People vs. No-Game People is easy. But Ha…
/r/TheRedPill25/08/16 08:35 PM
1

basically The Red Pill with DT lenses is The Red Pill on steroids (where what used to be considered impossible is now very possible or Game is when you become the magician and apply emotional indoctrination to others. as /u/NeoreactionSafe would say) You are talking from the point of view of who does not use steroids. Hence, assuming "normal" is "not using steroids". But what if what you call "using steroids" normal. At that point, you have a normal state (natural state (natural laws?)), which i…
/r/TheRedPill25/08/16 06:10 PM
2

I think you are a bigot if you don't agree on what I say.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/16 10:08 PM
4

And they're all about Strategy, Game, how to be DT, how to influence others, how to win friends and all that. It's so strange that you met so many people that, let's take just that book about winning friends, and they all go about acclaiming it and the likes. But then, the same people who acclaim those kind of books, when they are presented the core ideas from which the ideas in those books are created from they seem to not be able to see or accept them. So strange. Or so low IQ and low aware? N…
/r/TheRedPill23/08/16 04:23 PM
1

they are really combined into one Energy, spec. Flows of Energy. Transfers of Energy. Also, clashes of Energies. Since everything is Energy, conscious capabilities of controlling Energy create effects in the manifested world. Game and Frame are nominalizations of processes.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/16 08:45 PM
1

Fact remains: A group of people can leverage their mental capabilities and create movements that they can spread on the world (which essentially is Game). There are other groups which are not even capable to deal with the complexity of some concepts, and never in their life they will be capable to create such kind of complexities. Yes, absolutely, they can be explained, they can be shown these complexities, you can easily explain all of it to them. But, you see, it is spoiled on the root since t…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/16 06:09 PM
1

I see what you mean. Words are not easy to use as they are easily perceived differently. This is all very esoteric. Red pill is a praxeology not a philosophy. We are interested in the technical workings and everything must begin from there. Take just one concept as an example: frame. Then take a man who doesn't know what it is, and a man who knows what it is. The praxeology, or as I would say, the manifestations of being aware of the concept of frame will be: to be able to use it and create mani…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/16 01:27 PM
-4

That's on the technical plane. Go higher than that. Someone must have first thought about Grammar, Logic and Rhetoric before they came to be together and labelled under the term "Trivium." Critical thinking is about acknowledging that any tangible manifestation (either they be material or ideas) are a direct consequence of a previous intangible mental process. When you see it, you will be able to analyze already created manifestations on their deep roots. And then, over time, you will be able to…
/r/TheRedPill19/08/16 05:12 PM
1

Hence, the closer one goes to the source, the purer the "unmanifested" energy is the more complex its manifestations can be. People see the tangible manifestations, the leafs, and they try to make sense of them on the dimensional level of the manifestation. Whereas the "sense" of the manifested derives from the intangible level(s) (the mind). The purer the sources of energy one can manage and control, the greater the power of its manifestations. Game has indeed different levels of intangibility.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/16 08:51 PM
1

That's clear. I wanted to contribute with an additional point of view.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/16 08:30 PM
2

Seems like some spiritual/metaphysical stuff. To which your initial reactive response was something akin to a dismissal. Association is how the mind works. Whenever you find yourself having an almost automatic response to something intangible (response to fire on the skin is understandable, but ideas?), think about the motive(s) for that response. Whenever something is associated with something else, think, why it is associated? Perhaps someone pushed for that association? Perhaps yes, perhaps n…
/r/TheRedPill17/08/16 07:48 PM
1

Exactly. Most of those who will read this will have a specific reaction. That reaction was induced. The fact remains: The Knowledge is there, it exists in and of itself, it is independent from any human being and form of live. If we don't exists, the things that happen in the universe will continue to happen. Humans came, and they have captured some, if not most of, "The Knowledge". It bears to repeat: The Knowledge (what it is about, how it is structured, its principles and so on) does not depe…
/r/TheRedPill13/08/16 08:56 PM
1

An alpha is a leader, and a beta is a follower. A person can be high quality, muscular, good looking, whatever, but if they are weak within the context of the group they are a beta. What about the owners? People here talk a lot about physical characteristics, but why not-tangible characteristics are less talked about? Mmmh perhaps exactly because they are intangible. We know that the less the IQ the more they rely on the tangible and the less they can create and bare complex structures and situa…
/r/TheRedPill13/08/16 08:33 PM
1

The actual asking whether one is beta makes him beta. If you're satisfied with your decisions you don't need other people's approval.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/16 08:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter