TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

lasercow Archive

View 1 posts and 122 comments by lasercow on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

because they assert that ANYONE who believes that women should have the same rights as men IS a feminist by definition so they believe that people are buying into negative portrayals of feminism by refusing to awknowledge it. The problem is two three fold 1) "Women should have the same rights as men" is a problematic statement or belief because what rights exactly do men have, what are rights in the first place, and what if any rights do men lack that are extended to women. If you believe that W…
/r/MensRights03/01/15 09:31 PM
8

It's not just women....guys think every guy is like them or just some stereotype. Basically people are stupid about people
/r/seduction17/05/14 04:38 PM
2

Smert
/r/seduction17/05/14 04:35 PM
2

please do
/r/MensRights06/03/14 07:29 PM
2

im just saying, dont be a dick. thank you for translating
/r/MensRights06/03/14 06:50 PM
0

without a translator? how am I supposed to do that? I dont speak the fucking language
/r/MensRights06/03/14 05:37 PM
6

I am more concerned when I see the 2 first raw of a parking reserved for Women (not family, women) than this. wtf is this? where does this happen? either women, or family? that is fucked up
/r/MensRights06/03/14 05:35 PM
5

Lots of compounded rejection.....rejection is closely associated with male gender and early schooling to me.....rejection of who and how I was
/r/MensRights20/12/13 10:55 PM
-1

True....which is y it bothers me that protections against age discrimination is only ever written and enforced to protect elderly. But elderly people are often predated upon, abused, demonized and ignored. They have privilege and are also discriminated against
/r/MensRights11/09/13 08:21 PM
-6

Yes because I'm much more interested in youth rights than in gender issues....op said some bullshit tho....n half the pics in the op were irrelevant or misleadingly presented That doesn't say how old he is....nor does it justify talking about the youth in a derogatory way.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 02:01 PM
-1

So ageism isn't a thing? It's totally fine to use someone's age as a basis for critisim? What if they are elderly? Is it fine to discount them then? The youth and the elderly are very often discriminated against and are very vulnerable and often completely denied rights. You know what? You clearly arnt interested in equality. I'm done Fuck off
/r/MensRights11/09/13 01:57 AM
2

You displayed ageism and depicted op as an angry male child stereotype....that at least is pretty bullshit. Teenagers often have a better head on their shoulders than adults....especially when dealing with these issues. You have no right to insult the youth
/r/MensRights11/09/13 12:51 AM
1

maybe you are right...not my experience.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 08:31 PM
2

for low skilled labor yes...still going to be a lower middle class income
/r/MensRights13/05/13 05:38 PM
0

I think that few people get less attention than very fat, very ugly women who are starting to show their age. I have no basis for thinking this really...its just what I would guess.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 05:37 PM
6

garbage workers are usually municiple employees...and thus are more likely to be unionized...even if they arnt, most of them are still going to have health care, pension plans, and decent wages because thats how public employees are compensated. construction workers are paid more because construction/carpentry isnt actually low skill labor at all.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 05:35 PM
2

because even multi-murderers sometimes get parole
/r/MensRights04/05/13 03:52 PM
2

me either
/r/MensRights23/04/13 04:39 PM
1

thats fucking stupid and nonsensical though. what you are saying is that there is no difference between non consensual forced penetration rape when both parties are 14 years old, and consensual intercourse when both parties are 14 years old. thats stupid...we need better laws
/r/MensRights21/04/13 09:59 PM
1

no not really...same age people having sex with each other is either consensual or not. what is it mutual rape?
/r/MensRights20/04/13 09:49 PM
1

not really...it sets the age of consent differently in specific situations.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 03:33 PM
2

Ya I thought that was weird....I think that, it must include Washington DC
/r/MensRights20/04/13 03:32 PM
2

almost every state in the US that has an age of consent lower than 18 has an age difference law. so at least most US states think there should be
/r/MensRights20/04/13 02:06 PM
1

obviously an age difference law that is nuanced.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 02:05 PM
2

18 is a relatively uncommon age of consent...16 is much more common. but ya...i dont think its over simplification i think its carelessness and disregard...these laws are passed to protect young people from predation by older people...and the people who wrote them just didnt care who was hurt by it and didnt craft the law carefully
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:56 PM
1

age difference laws solve the issue of "draw the line somewhere" yes draw the line somewhere, but then legalize people who are close in age but on opposite sides of the line. thats what most US states have done.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:41 PM
8

It's kind of a situation where you have to draw the line somewhere. thats what statutory rape is...when consensual sex occurs across 'the line' it is statutory rape. They probably shouldn't have been having sex if there was that musch distrust between them anyway what are you talking about? what distrust? for all we know she testified that it was completely consensual and supports him? in all likelihood it was someone else that accused him, otherwise consent and normal rape would be the issue.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:38 PM
2

how do we know that? asking not challenging.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:36 PM
4

word. fyi Colorado has an age difference law of 10 years for those 15 or above, but an age of consent of 17.... weird right?
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:35 PM
2

now thats fucking stupid.... but that used to be the case in lots of US states...and for some reason the age of consent was always lower for females...which I am still surprised by. To be clear, I dont think any US states have gender based age of consent laws anymore.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:33 PM
2

are there age difference laws in the UK? to protect people like this dude who had sex with people almost the same age?
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:29 PM
1

thats how it works in NY anyway.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:28 PM
9

I dont think its an 8 year window dude...could be wrong but you should cite
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:27 PM
2

assume the age of consent is 16 (as it is in 30 of the 50 US states) a 15 year old (of either gender) has sex with a 17 year old (of either gender) this state also does not have a romeo and juliet law. Statutory rape has occurred...the 17 year old is now a rapist under the law...regardless of the gender of either teenager. and yes there are some states where this is the case.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:24 PM
6

this would not be considered statutory rape in most US states...very few make this illegal. most states have passed romeo and juliet laws specifically to fix the problem that teenagers who are close in age are not legally allowed to have sex with each other.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:21 PM
0

yes, but almost every state has redressed this problem and fixed it with romeo and juliet laws...whatever state this happened in has been negligent.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:19 PM
2

thats basically what the law in most states is...the problem is that a few states have not dealt with the age difference problem
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:16 PM
3

the real issue is that a teenager is being put on the sex offender registry for having consensual sex with another teenager who is close in age. the issue is that that is illegal and it shouldn't be and it criminalizes normal sexual behavior for youth of a certain age. a secondary issue is that there is gender bias in enforcement, and prosecution of people who fall victim to this stupid punitive pointless law.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:15 PM
7

age of majorety no the issue...age of consent is the issue wikipedia on age of consent in US
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:11 PM
1

the issue here is the age of consent not the age of majority...in most US states the age of consent is 16 wikipedia
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:10 PM
1

I actually have no idea...i deal with this issue because it comes up in youth rights circles...feminists havnt had much to say about it that I have heard. But this isnt a major issue for us...just one that comes up.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:09 PM
1

laws are also strikingly different between states. just ask wikipedia
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:06 PM
1

the issue is the age of consent...which in most states is 16. most states (where 16 is the age of consent) also have romeo and juliet laws to allow teenagers who are close in age but on opposite sides of the age of consent to legally have sex.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:05 PM
3

this would not be statutory rape in most states...very few states have ages of consent of 16 while also having no are difference law (romeo and juliet law) that makes it legal for people between 12 and 16 to have sex with those who are close in age.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:02 PM
2

check out Georgia's laws on the issue. then for a different reason...check out Colorado's. Laws about this issue are weirdly all over the map.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 12:59 PM
6

12 states states have an age of consent of 18.....but they are among the most populous states. 9 states have an age of consent of 17 30 states have an age of consent of 16 wikipedia
/r/MensRights20/04/13 12:57 PM
2

the fact that they were both under the age of majorety is not the issue. one of them was under the age of consent. We dont know what state this is in, but most US states have an age of consent of 16...most of them also have age difference laws (romeo and juliet laws) that allow teenagers between 12 and 16 to legally have sex with people within a certain age...usually 2-4 years, but sometimes more, Colorado has an age difference law of 10 years for 15 year olds.... but there are some states with …
/r/MensRights20/04/13 12:52 PM
2

the age of majority is not the issue. the age of consent is. most US states have an age of consent of 16
/r/MensRights20/04/13 12:46 PM
17

its kind of absurd to define a 17 year old and a 15 year old having sex as statutory rape. thats the point.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 12:33 PM
4

no thats not the question...she was under the age of consent and he wasnt....that would only be the real question if they were both under the age of consent. the point is that its messed up that someone is criminalized for having sex with someone who might be in the same fucking grade in highschool.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 12:32 PM
2

Having a couple of women try to do that at one function is still an absurdly high number. if it was 1 woman or maaaybe 2 you could say that it might not be a pattern
/r/MensRights07/04/13 04:21 PM
2

ya it should be...why cant we use the actual word pairs for anything?
/r/MensRights07/04/13 03:38 PM
2

You may or may not be right about that. I think it depends on the details of how the talk went, (I didnt realize it was so late, that was a bad call) but either way, he learned and gained from it. He may not have been strong enough to walk away, but it seems like he will be next time
/r/seduction20/03/13 03:51 PM
1

and this is why I never could really get involved in seddit or any part of this community. Im a natural…not a prodigy, just pretty good… My game is not always on point, but I am intuitive about women, I love women, and I click with alot of them. I miss lots of opportunities…like five minutes ago sitting at the same computer I am typing at now, a college girl sat at the computer next to me, engaged me in a little tiny conversation, and smiled at me a few times…I talked to her and was friendly and…
/r/seduction20/03/13 03:40 PM
19

I dunno, I think its kinda cool how he was straight up with her and put in the effort to communicate. probobly got more catharsis, closure, growth, and confidence from doing it that way…plus if he did it in a cool and respectful way, then she probobly appreciated it too
/r/seduction20/03/13 03:21 PM
0

Very few states have the situation that you discribed. I believe NY is one of them though.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 08:43 PM
1

There are some states where this would be illegal, but in the vast majority of states it would be perfectly legal. Most states have an age of consent of 16 and even many who dont have age difference laws...only a few specific states still prohibit a 19 year old and a 16 year old
/r/MensRights27/02/13 08:42 PM
5

she did say that it is 'the problem'
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:44 AM
5

Women are often told "you don't need men, let me take you shopping for a vibrator" by their friends and shit. its common enough that it would show up in a sitcom. men on the other hand are mocked for masturbating and attacked for watching porn. women who watch porn are liberated, men who do are creeps. it does seem that women are being told that they don't need men and that masturbating is a way to avoid being too effected by them, whereas men are told that they do need women and masturbating is…
/r/MensRights03/01/13 11:35 PM
0

no....just saying that there is such a thing as excessive force.. There is no such thing as overkill when it comes to defending yourself. I was only talking about this statement. excessive force has to be clear and easily demonstrable if you are going to accuse some of it.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 05:02 PM
0

there is such a thing as excessive use of force...you cant shoot someone for shoving you. shoving is assault...could result in injury, but that doesnt justify shooting them. if someone attacks you with a wiffle ball bat it is still assault...but again, that doesnt mean you can shoot them.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 04:12 AM
26

are you even a little surprised?
/r/MensRights16/10/12 04:08 AM
2

well, he's a mainstream asshole. They never run a balanced budget. clearly a generalized insult directed at all politicians who are involved in government deficits and branding them as "mainstream" with a connotation of "the problem" for doing so. I learned that from Economics. Reagan took economics and beat it into submission to fit his political ideologies and to please his corporate friends and supporters. Reaganomics is pretty fucked up, just like any economic viewpoint derived from any poli…
/r/MensRights07/05/12 10:58 PM
2

You are right. The huge deficits of the last decade previous to the financial crisis were unbelievable. Paying for 2 wars while having a huge new 10 year tax cut plan was extremely irresponsible. If we had not run those massive deficits then, we would be alot better off now when we really need to deficit spend in a big way. We could have another stimulus/jobs/infrastructure bill give more assistance to homeowners with difficult mortgages, and have a tax rebate, and still be far below uncomfortab…
/r/MensRights07/05/12 10:41 PM
6

This is very true. go back and edit to include it!
/r/MensRights07/05/12 07:01 PM
11

There are lots of male SRSers. They are just as horrible as the female ones.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 07:00 PM
33

people who post in SRS are unwelcome anywhere.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 06:59 PM
3

You do realize there are very good reasons for running a deficit in a recession? In fact it is the only responsible option if there is a market for your government debt?
/r/MensRights07/05/12 06:57 PM
6

no he is the Messiah of the Self-righteous, the voice validating people who think they know better than everyone else, by providing them with a wallpaper thin vision of how it would be if people who really know were in charge.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 06:55 PM
1

dont. its not gunna work
/r/seduction01/05/12 08:42 PM
1

Its better to have happened to a thief regardless of sex talk about cruel and unusual punishment. no due process etc. no I cant agree with you that Its better to have happened to a thief regardless of sex thieves are not necessarily even bad people. plenty of people have turned the thievery out of desperation. They are also human, and this is a massive crime against human rights and dignity.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 07:11 PM
1

coercion has a legal definition, and there are legal definitions of consent. (something like cannot be given under duress) It is then up to the legal system to determine where to draw the line. I suspect that none of the things you just listed would fall under it. but ya there will always be a grey area in these things.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 08:48 PM
1

If you first said no, but later gave in to some reason, and sexual actions ONLY happened after you gave in... is it rape? Does it depend upon why you gave in just like you cant force someone to consent to sex with a gun to their head, or by blackmailing them with the threat of ruining their career, you cant threaten them into consenting. This is difficult to prove, and sometimes difficult to differentiate what should be considered coercive enough to invalidate consent. (is it coercion if you thr…
/r/MensRights07/04/12 04:37 PM
1

first off, did you mean sexual advances? secondly, it is possible to give consent without verbally saying it, and still have it be clear as day. For instance if a person is the one who initiates sex, it is virtually always clear that they gave consent. If you first said no, but later gave in to some reason, and sexual actions ONLY happened after you gave in... is it rape? Does it depend upon why you gave in no I do not think that is rape, if the second time you give explicit or implicit consent.…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 02:01 PM
2

I got confused too when you said that, I thought I had made a mistake. had to go back and check. (I read that one too)
/r/MensRights05/04/12 09:01 PM
4

as described, he initiated the sex.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 07:32 PM
1

technically rape is the incident. If you consent to sex and then regret it and have nightmares about it, it is still not rape if you consented. If you are raped, but decide that you enjoyed it afterwards, and you dont suffer any problems from it....it is still rape and when I said then its a different story I meant it is much less clear if consent was given or not I did not mean then clearly consent was given.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 06:29 PM
2

I get your point but if a guy says no, and then passively goes along with it, thats rape. if a guy (or a girl) says no, and then actively participates in initiating it, then its a different story
/r/MensRights05/04/12 06:17 PM
9

even so, we should all agree that in this case he explicitly did not have consent. Therefor this would be rape
/r/MensRights05/04/12 06:15 PM
9

but in this case he explicitly had consent withdrawn, and just didnt think it was for real. Not a leg to stand on.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 06:14 PM
5

"lets see if we can make it better"
/r/seduction24/02/12 02:03 PM
0

the irony of seeing you post here dude
/r/seduction24/02/12 01:40 PM
0

very common for guys in their 30s to marry single mothers
/r/MensRights19/02/12 10:32 PM
2

exactly
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:34 AM
7

this is bullshit. some people can still walk when they dont even recognize people's faces
/r/MensRights12/02/12 11:09 PM
3

He means that the reason the OP believed the charge was because the OP thought the girl was a slut. the OP thinks sluts are more likely to be raped therefore the OP believed she had been raped.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 03:07 AM
1

I dont think this has much to do with reality
/r/MensRights11/01/12 03:05 AM
7

I think you are onto something here
/r/MensRights11/01/12 03:05 AM
4

people who feel guilty about their promiscuity often lie about it. thats the only thing I would feel solid saying in this conversation.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 03:02 AM
1

we dont believe your anecdotes. you can stop making them up. doesnt mean none of the things you are raising are valid, though I dont agree with you about what the major problems are. make your arguments from justifiable positions and established facts
/r/MensRights11/01/12 02:57 AM
1

Basic human rights should be established for all as a backdrop. We need more rights than just basic human rights. our culture and society provide more rights to American citizens regardless of their sub-group than basic human rights guarantees them. Freedom of speech, the right of habeas corpus, and many other fundamental rights are not guaranteed in the UN definition of human rights. Discrimination and oppression of sub-groups exist even with human rights guaranteed, and some human rights are d…
/r/MensRights23/08/11 05:47 PM
1

Ya. I dont think I ever came across this article before though.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:52 PM
1

I was only asking if it changes the legal status. Not really sure how to react to the rest of it.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:50 PM
4

I don't think you are helping anyone with that moral code. You dont have to give a shit about anyone. But you should never look the other way over murder. That is about a clear an example of dispicable morality as I can think of.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 11:48 PM
2

Is he not still legally the father? does he lose his legal rights as a father because he did not turn out to be the biological father?
/r/MensRights05/07/11 11:30 PM
5

No statement like this is ever acceptable. Killing sprees = bad. justifications for them? nope.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 11:29 PM
4

part 2 Direct link to foxnews article for sources or whatever
/r/MensRights05/07/11 11:10 PM
2

Thanks, I guess dress codes are different in the UK. virtually all US schools have dress codes of some kind, but public schools generally have very limited ones because several major court cases decided that they were unduly restricting student freedom of speech. There was an anti-vietnam armband protest that was banned by a last minute change to the dress code to disallow all armbands, and a court case saying that hairstyle/hairlength is a legitimate medium for political expression (during the …
/r/MensRights11/05/11 09:25 PM
14

This is pretty hateful. I am cross-posting this link to r/youthrights First off the military is a voluntary membership organization, school is not. I don't know the law governing school attendance in this area, and whether this young man's family has a choice as to which school he attends, but in the US (where I do know the law) dress codes are usually considered infringements on freedom of expression in the public school setting especially as they pertain to hairstyle, political speech, gender …
/r/MensRights10/05/11 06:16 PM
0

good point
/r/MensRights04/05/11 03:35 AM
0

unless there is other evidence, such as being drugged, circumstantial evidence, etc.
/r/MensRights04/05/11 12:30 AM
0

You don't know their relationship status or anything about their views on relationships. Its between them. If you get involved when you don't even have a connection to them that is more than casual then you are imposing your ideas about relationships on them and their situation. Who knows what stage their relationship is in, for all we know it is about to end for different reasons. Maybe he is a douche and she is cheating on him because she no longer cares and she is going to dump him without te…
/r/MensRights04/05/11 12:08 AM
1

ad hominem
/r/MensRights03/05/11 11:58 PM
1

good research. you are right that it seems likely money was involved. but we cant assume
/r/MensRights02/05/11 05:27 PM
1

true that is common. but that doesnt mean that is what is going on every time
/r/MensRights02/05/11 05:26 PM
6

Yup that was my first reaction. I guess self defense falls under that never?
/r/MensRights29/04/11 04:14 PM
1

I would like to know how that language was introduced and how it was treated by the court.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 04:13 PM
-2

I agree with you that the circumstances are troubling, but there was no reference to money in all of this. for all we know she is independently wealthy.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 04:05 PM
2

It seems that the government isn't as good an example of a substituted dependency as the socially constructed privilages that allow women in certain situations to shed responcibility for their actions or the outcomes of their decisions. When women believe that they are being held back in their career because they are a woman, but the reality is that they have not been working as hard or sacrificing as much as the male colleague that they are comparing themself to it means that the worth of her w…
/r/MensRights29/04/11 01:17 AM
3

Nevertheless I am giving it. I have read alot of discussions between people open minded feminists and open minded MRA that still decend into ad hominems and choas, It really really felt good to read this also my username comes from this which you should totally read no one has ever commented on it before which is really weird now that I think about it.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 12:57 AM
1

I agree but the Fringe make the reasonable moderates seem more reasonable. Malcome X made Martin Luthar King more legitimate just by existing, etc. (nothing against Malcome X, I have great respect for him and his personal journey, but he did make it easier for american society to adjust to King's softer approach)
/r/MensRights29/04/11 12:46 AM
1

And a special thanks to you OP for coming to this subreddit with such a possitive attitude arm extended laurels in hand across the divide. Thank you.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 12:35 AM
2

I just want to say its been a pleasure reading both of your posts...
/r/MensRights29/04/11 12:34 AM
1

It depends on which state or country you are in. Apparently rape is a lot more gender neutral in some states in the US than in others. Also apparently in the UK you have to have a penis to commit rape.
/r/MensRights15/04/11 02:19 PM
2

There is a technical difference between lying and being intentionally misleading, but is there a substantive difference?
/r/MensRights14/04/11 09:02 PM
2

Thank you for your anecdote and your user name. Got link about it?
/r/MensRights12/04/11 03:11 PM
1

I totally agree with that! In fact I support open relationships too so you never have to limit yourself!
/r/MensRights31/03/11 10:06 PM
3

Sometimes shes not just jerking you around. people are complex psychological beings. If she wants you, but shes afraid to admit it, shes intimidated by you, she has trouble opening up, or any number of things like that she is not intentionally jerking you around, or being selfish or manipulative. Very similar behaviors might come from someone who is being selfish, manipulative, or otherwise jerking you around or toying with you. I have encountered a girl who was very self protective because she …
/r/MensRights31/03/11 06:19 PM
1

but sometimes the attraction exists...but the situation creates obstacles. Like chasing a very innocent girl who isn't used to being chased and starts to run away at the first sign of direct courtship. sometimes that girl is worth chasing indefinitely with the most delicate touch. Sometimes you do that land later find out you got way more invested then it was worth. Sometimes you have a one night stand, that turns into another hookup, and eventually you get really excited about each other. It ca…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 04:56 PM
3

Why have so many rules about what you are looking for and what you do in particular situations. There are girls I would pursue carefully for months (extended courtship) and girls who I would lose interest in if it didn't happen right away. But sometimes those girls that Happen right away turn into the ones that you want to be with. I'm just saying adapt yourself to the situation and the individual. Do what feels right this time not what you told yourself you should do because of your rules.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 04:24 PM
1

lol (upvote for you) I don't really care if you are sincere in this statement or not. It is funny and ballsy to say it here. nonetheless in a serious tone Boobies might exempt you from the necessity of buying milk for your cereal, but not from having to pay your share. also unrelated I think the risk of paying for too many things is the risk of being manipulated but also conversely the risk of excessive dependency. Edit: added topic separator in bold, and upvote indicator
/r/MensRights29/03/11 05:37 PM
1

There are plenty of men who do think that. Don't substitute your own biases for theirs.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 06:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter