TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

laserdollars420 Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by laserdollars420 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

By your own advice, I would also like to point out you flew off the handle a bit in your initial response to my first comment here. I wasn't trying to put words in your mouth at all, just agreeing with your claim that without a conviction there is nothing to go off. In the context of the thread, my comment was just stating that if we're using this logic then there's no reason to be upset at Cardi B either. It was more directed at people reading the thread and in light of the thread as a whole, n…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/20 04:05 PM
1

The entire thread has been about why people should be upset at Cardi B. I was simply agreeing with you that a lack of conviction should mean we treat them both as innocent, since that was the topic of the thread. Sounds like we've been on the same page all along. Sorry for misinterpreting your intent.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/20 03:56 PM
1

Sorry, allow me to be more clear. You accused me of defending others for assuming Kobe is guilty. I am not defending people accusing Kobe of any guilt. To your second point: admission does not equal guilt. Many people lie or exaggerate for a lot of different reasons. In your first comment you claimed that a conviction should be the bar for guilt. I agree. So let's lay off both.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/20 03:45 PM
1

I'm not defending anyone here. The comment I originally responded to was you saying that Kobe was not convicted, so therefore any claims about his alleged assault are false. I was simply stating that using that same logic, we should also treat any claims about Cardi B's guilt as false as well. If you think people should stop attacking Kobe, you must also feel that people should stop attacking Cardi B, since there is no evidence of guilt in either case.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/20 03:20 PM
1

No convictions, no guilt. That's your logic and I'm sticking to it.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/20 02:30 PM
0

Might wanna look at the usernames. I haven't said anything about Kobe's guilt. All I'm saying is there is an equal amount of evidence for both and that therefore they can be held to the same standard. You can't defend Kobe while also attacking Cardi B. And no I do not take an offhanded admission as actual evidence of guilt since there is an equal chance she is just lying to play into her image like many rappers do about crimes they may or may not have actually committed.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/20 01:29 PM
0

Good point. Cardi B wasn't convicted either so by that logic I guess we're all good here.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/20 01:06 PM
2

I've seen posts with the genders swapped and trust me, the sub is consistent in the idea that significant others should discuss large purchases before making them. They also largely agree with you that it's not necessarily a permission thing so much as having a discussion about it first. Another factor is separate vs joint accounts and in this case the husband spent this money from the joint account, which means he absolutely should've consulted his wife first.
/r/MGTOW27/09/19 10:00 PM
-1

Yep, they'd still be saying NTA because people generally expect their spouses to communicate with each other before making large purchases no matter their gender.
/r/MGTOW27/09/19 06:59 PM
-1

I mean, the kid is 2. That doesn't really seem that relevant here. It's also not mentioned in the post whatsoever.
/r/MGTOW25/09/19 04:06 PM
-2

If he wants to work, why did he have a baby? This logic can easily cut both ways.
/r/MGTOW25/09/19 03:07 PM
3

I didn't get from the post that she wanted him to change his. She just wanted their kids to have both last names.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 05:20 PM
1

I mainly said it because obviously no one is taking it into account in this thread and because, like I said, I was using that person's own logic/generalizations against them.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 02:19 AM
2

Are you really surprised that no one chooses to go through a horribly traumatic experience for something that offers no benefit for them whatsoever? It's perplexing to me that you have turned such a simple concept into some judgement about women being motivated solely by money.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 12:06 AM
2

Ah well at least now I see where you're coming from, but I feel like you're not considering the fact that most people don't want to go through what is often described as the most painful experience of your life.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 11:57 PM
1

They did use a condom though? And why should it be his decision what she has to endure physically and emotionally? In a perfect world they would have equal say, but when two people disagree and there is no middle ground or compromise there needs to be some sort of tie breaker, and it should go to the person whose body it is and whose health is at stake.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 11:38 PM
5

You're right, no woman has ever chosen to be a surrogate mother for money. Also I'm sorry but I do not understand your thought process on this at all. She didn't want to go through something that would be horrifically painful and likely traumatizing and somehow it has to do with money?
/r/MensRights18/07/19 11:36 PM
5

Why does it never occur to anyone that even in this scenario she would have to go through an incredibly damaging pregnancy (mentally, physically, and emotionally)? It sounds to me like she was more concerned with not having to carry a fetus and go through labor more than anything else.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 10:17 PM
2

Are there clinical studies showing that a man suffers mental health problems from their partner having an abortion? If there are then I will grant you that, but currently all I'm familiar with are the multitude of studies that show how likely it is for women to suffer trauma and mental health issues as a result of labor.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 10:13 PM
2

I’m meaning her mental health or her physical health. I stand by my previous comment. She had unprotected sex and therefore the consequences are something she’ll have to deal with. Why should her consequences be so much worse than the man's, whose body never has to go through what hers would have to go through if he made her keep it?
/r/MensRights18/07/19 09:46 PM
4

if the pregnancy will negatively effect her. This is virtually every single unwanted pregnancy (and many wanted pregnancies), FYI.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 09:42 PM
4

I guess women don’t think about this stuff. And I guess men don't think of the physical toll that a pregnancy takes on a woman (to be clear, this is not what I actually feel; I'm just turning your argument on its head since you seem to be ignoring a lot of factors). All of those things you said would've been helpful, yes, but do nothing to negate the physical and emotional impacts of pregnancy. Also, the OP of that thread mentioned at one point that she already has mental health issues and she w…
/r/MensRights18/07/19 09:37 PM
5

He should’ve been told and given a choice because he helped create that child. A lot to unpack here. Should he have been told? Probably. Should he have been given a choice? What does that even mean? A choice in whether or not she should carry a fetus around inside of her for 9 months and then undergo an incredibly painful and often mentally-damaging labor? I don't think it's his place at all to decide what happens to her body. As for the last point, he helped to conceive the baby, but wouldn't h…
/r/MensRights18/07/19 09:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter