TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

lastoflast67 Archive

View 0 posts and 788 comments by lastoflast67 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

you clearly do have a problem with it because when I said it the first time your response was to disagree on the most pointless grounds because you where triggered that RPers gave an answer you couldn't refute. But that's not what my OP is about, and not the sentiments I'm talking about in my OP Who gives a fuck? Defining a strawman redpill position and recruiting people to defend it is ridiculous. What you claim is a "Proposed solution" is up for debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 12:12 AM
0

Your reply to my point an entirely irrelevant disagreement that you clearly just typed out becuase you cant refute what I said but also cant handle the emotional hit of just conceding the point. Again this is why BP always looses your arguments do not hold up at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 11:54 PM
0

Okay, sure... I do think that's already how most people date though Idk why that is relevant to even say, also this whole post is about rp advice why would advice to a general population be to do what you are already doing? That defeats the point of advice. Ur just triggered at this point. Why are you getting pissy at me and making things personal? Im not, im just not coddling you like a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 11:49 PM
1

It absolutely is, if we wanted to settle down with these men we would Its not the advice, which is more conservative advice that many RPers agree with because its just true, is to find the most attractive man that will commit instead of chasing the most attractive man that is also attracted to the woman. Men determining who they do and don't think is "on our level looks wise" doesn't magically create desire in women That's not how that works You can't just give a woman a rating, and a man the sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 11:37 PM
-1

Hypergamy is not a state its a psychological inclination.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 10:56 PM
4

Your comment: So can you explain how this isn't just circular reasoning at that point? If we start with the belief that women are hypergamous (in this manner), and so she always chooses her best option, then de facto any man a woman is with was her best option. This can't be disproven. No women could ever pair with a guy who wasn't her best option (for whatever reason), because if she's with him then he was her best option. Which also makes me question then in that case how can women "choose bet…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 10:38 PM
3

Everything you said is wrong but its also besides the point. Respond to my actual argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 10:26 PM
1

In this para In a post tagged Plus your comment here argues that this is a red pill idea
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 10:21 PM
1

I don’t care what women do. But if a woman can’t find an attractive man willing to commit, it means she has an extremely unattractive personality, is delusional, or both. It’s not good for society to respect these wants and they have no right to attractive men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 10:16 PM
-5

No "best" is a weasel word that allows you to jump around from different definitions whenever you feel like you are loosing the argument. When RP talks about hypergamy this is exactly what they mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 10:10 PM
1

Ok and some red pillers love chocolate ice cream, that doesnt mean liking chocolate ice cream is redpill doctrine. Redpillers believing in something does not mean redpill has doctrine and some people believing in in two ideas does not mean those two ideas are the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 09:37 PM
-6

Because women don't choose their "best" option, hypergamy is the pursuit of the option with the highest value in the sexual market place. So women can choose better by having a multi dimensional judging matrix, and valuing things outside of pure SMV like, likelihood to commit, moral integrity etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 09:35 PM
-1

AF/BB is red-pill doctrine Ok and the point hes making is that societal "solutions" are not redpill doctrine because red pill doesn't have doctrine, its a praxeology. Redpill is not a concern with or advocates for any type of greater fix to society, its just a method for men who are interested in understanding the world around them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 09:28 PM
1

The solution proposed is that these women settle down very early with undesirable men (because as is established, desirable men have options and men with options don't commit to women). These men by definition of the red-pill are the least desirable demographic of men, with neither looks; money; nor status to offer the most desirable group of women that all men want. But at least the women will have committed relationships, and the men will have sex; legacy; and companionship with women who have…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 09:24 PM
2

The dude can be worse than her in every conceivable metric, but if he's better than her other options she's still hypergamous? yes
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 09:19 PM
10

and women also are the ones that call for divorce in most cases so the women likey feel like they have outgrown the man
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 01:39 AM
-1

women hate accountability
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 11:44 PM
0

its much more likely to be cope
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 11:37 PM
8

These prove correlation but not your conclusion. Its just as possible from this that women who feel they are in a positon of power within the relationship are likey to abuse it and therefore the only men that get into relationships under these dynamics are men with low self esteem who dont think they value being treated better.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 11:33 PM

but you hate men so ofc you would say this lol. You should jus change your flair to blue pill and stop larping at purple pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 08:13 PM

You clearly do, you collectively blame all men for the actions of what are literally a tiny minority. That's by definition bigoted stereotyping and gender based hate.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 08:09 PM
5

It does have to be actual hatred, thats what the word means. Also your logic makes no sense, you cant just assume every man who harms another is doing it because he hates men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 08:07 PM
2

Men definitely don't think highly of other men Yeah they think of other men a normal amount.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 08:05 PM
1

Some person on a red pill forum says some thing does not mean this is what red pill says. Also this is just a dumb argument ofc social costs are part of the reason men don't rape, social costs are part of the reason women don't rape as well, women aren't more altruistic they are just less able and have lower sex drives. No one is 100% altruistic, punishments and costs are always why people choose not to do bad things. Moreover these quotes are referring to the minority of men who don't have the …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 08:03 PM
-1

Is it something you also want to adress with said gamers screaming murders about muscular or "unfeminine" or "not sexy enough" women in video games? They're allowed to speak their minds, others are allowed to speak their minds about their opinions, etc. What's the problem? Do you think we should all just not be allowed to do so? invalid comparison men have the right to complain because we are the customers and target audience, feminists are activists and cultural infiltrators. They are not askin…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 10:54 PM
0

No men just do not value the same things women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/25 11:48 PM
9

But even ugly men can be abusive. Even to attractive women. But there are more repercussions to an ugly guy being abusive socially so less of them will be.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 12:23 AM
7

Why Are Attractive Men Assumed to be Worse Partners? Its simple a lot of pro social behaviour is enforced by social environment, so more attractive men simply have less reason to be good partners so more of them will be worse partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 12:23 AM
0

so long as it is not used to pressure people into using it or making people feel unattractive without it. but that is literally what it has done lol. You talk to most women and they would agree they feel pressure to wear makeup, even when there is no hard rule or implicit expectation to do so. The reason is women are hard wired to compete with each other aesthetically, so if you allow one to pull ahead with makeup they will literally all feel compelled to keep up with the meta game and will feel…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 04:12 AM
1

Like antlers do have the function of defence from predators and rivals, that being said I understand your position. Dear shed their antlers in winter and most of the time the antlers they arent even useful for fighting because they are still growing and covered in velvet. Antler growth is to purely for sexual selection and the leading theory on why is that it signals to female dear: "look im so healthy I can spend a ton of resources to grow these useless things on my head and im still able to li…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 04:03 AM
2

Style and fashion don't do much to improve the looks(by looks I mean sexual attraction not aesthetics) of either men or women. Style and fashion for sure do a lot, it might not make a 5 a 9 but if ur an avg guy you can definfely set yourself above the norm since most guys put in very little effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 03:54 AM
1

so your version of positvie masuclinty is that men have 2 dimensional personalities and are capable of super human levels of violence. Really proving your point lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 06:00 PM
4

Ah i see the disconnect here. Hot sorority girls are not a monolith. The 7s sure are sleeping maybe even the 8s, but the 9s and 10s they aren't mostly because they can actually demand monogamy from chad so they just hop from committed relationship to committed relationship. The minority that dont are some type of prostitute and are making money on thier looks whether its modeling OF, being a industry girl that fucks rappers and sports stars etc. When they all get old chad is never going to marry…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 05:28 AM
0

your hot frat Chad will marry some hot sorority Stacy, both of them having some sexual history. No he wont stacy will hypergamously trade up to men who wont commit to her and waste her good years, then she will either settle for some beta bux she cheats on or die alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 04:25 AM
33

Agree with most of the people commenting maybe one or two matches a month and each has a 10-30% chance of replying and those that reply will ghost the moment there is a lul in conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 08:43 PM

You are definetly blue pill lmao what is up with all these BPers false claiming PP for credibility in critiquing RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 08:41 PM
1

building muscle and strength without worrying about also gaining fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 05:15 PM
14

no even if you are ugly you can still do shit like ogre maxing or other methods to increase your masculinity which will then allow for that building of desire. Also a beta provider doesnt understand or utilise his leverage at all, whereas even ugly guys can if they follow redpill.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 02:21 AM

they dont even do that, women defend other women becuase women are vindictive and highly childish. So if a woman gets seen by another to not defend other women, they will take that personally and start rumours or make negative comments to said woman etc. None of this is altruistic its all fear based.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 02:15 PM
1

Literally exact same problem lol. What even is this comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 05:37 PM
2

It's called a gay resort. Lesbians are gay. Did you read it? Lesbians were always allowed in, the one who sued was an asshole who was kicked out for bad behaviour Dont be obtuse it was clearly something created for gay men to meet and hook up, it being called a gay resort is simply because there is no gay male equivalent term of "lesbian".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 11:56 PM
2

Which ones? I'm not being snarky, it's a genuine question. Anything to do with nerd culture, so video games, comic books etc. These are all majority male spaces that have been force feminised by women. Pubs and similar drinking establishments, these places use to be like 99% male and then various governments had initiatives to force them to accommodate women. Sports aswell has a similar story to nerd culture, mostly male fanbases but there are various pushes to accommodate women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 11:54 PM
1

Concepts like sisterhood are typically much stronger than the concept of brotherhood This isnt true women are lying, when they seem to make friends much easier and become much more familiar with each other its not because they are more social or women are actually more open to like each other they are just engaging in this mutual farse, because if one party doesn't play along the other will spread rumours about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 11:50 PM
2

I get together with 6-12 women in my neighborhood regularly, we meet at homes and restaurants The fact that half of them dont show up regularly kind of defeats the point you are making lmao. Also build a social group needs more people then just the people in it, you might meet like 50 people before you gel enough with one person to become friends with them. So you likely had the female social spaces available to you to actually create this group, men don't have that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 11:44 PM
6

why not just improve girl scouts then instead of fucking up boy scouts
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 11:42 PM
12

heterosexuality is not an institution, its a sexuality and monogamy its not an intrinsic to it. Ths institution you are recognising are the social norms and attitudes established by Christianity within western culture that where built to establish monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 10:43 PM
6

Why can't you? Because you cant produce enough babies . Constant growth is not good for the survival of our species. Objectively untrue everything our humanity has achieved was because of this. There is no human progress without humans thinking that the lot of their sons can be better then the lot of theirs. . Astrophysicists did a study confirming that halting growth after a certain period was the best way to ensure even longer survival of the human species. link the study, 2. why should anyone…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 10:20 PM
5

Lesbians pop out babies from sperm donors all the time. it has to be that like 99.99% of sperm doners are straight men, gay men dont want to be donors of sperm. Also this isnt sustainable because women who use sperm donors only choose a very small % of men to be the sperm donor, so in your fantasy land within a generation or two even a large society would quickly run into issues with genetic diversity. . And gay men can impregnate women. None of them want to hence why they are gay. . if anything…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 10:15 PM
10

They're basically saying heterosexuality only works (keeps marriage and families intact) when women are limited and don't have the same level of freedom men have. Wrong, that claim is about monogamy not heterosexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 10:09 PM
-2

no we think women feel entitled to some things, mostly to an overall calibre of guy, and lie about how much weight they put on certain attributes of men. So an example a 6/10 will think she disserves what amounts to an 8/10 overall but lie about how much earnings and height can increase a man from say a 6 to an 8. Moreover the inherent contradictions you are picking up on are because women are incredibly hypocritical and contradictory, and will largely just say whatever in that given moment they…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 05:10 PM
1

What the "red pill" gets confused is cause and effect. People aren't desirable because they're mean and aloof, they're mean and aloof because they're desirable. Wrong again. Red pill doesn't say being mean and aloof makes you desirable, red pill shows that being nice doesn't meaningfully diminish your desirability, because its in response to the blue pill claim that being a nice guy is what attracts women. Also people aren't mean because they are desirable, they are mean for other reasons. Its t…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 12:57 AM
5

the economy is not just a game we play its the means by which we improve peoples lives, the economy crashing through population decline means peoples lives will be way worse, and by way worse I don't just mean ppl wont be able to buy iPhone and xboxes, i mean high rates of crime, suicide trauma etc. Also fuck the environment lol, what value does it hold compared to human suffering or without humans existing. Finally this perspective just makes no sense, overtime the amount of environmental damag…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 12:28 AM
10

That’s what they thought about slavery, secularism and letting normal people vote middle eastern countries directly disproves this lol. Iran went from a realtiviely progressive country to the people choosing to a theocracy, afghanistan had a similar trajectory. The Saudis basically have way more slaves now in the forms of indentured south Asian workers. history never moves in one direction that's a left wing propaganda.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 11:34 PM
3

cruel and oppressive of itself The overwhelming majority of people are not cruel of oppressive. . or destroys its own environment out of greed and want The environment has no practical or philosophical value outside of us.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 11:31 PM
4

But thats not them choosing not to have families that is them saying they want to but cant afford it. And also if you look at korea for example they have really high rates of suicide and like 50% of the young people want to emigrate. So these countries actually directly disprove your position that if people just choose not to have kids it will be good for society or ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 11:28 PM
6

wdym nothing wrong with it, it will mean a massive decrease in quality of life for everyone particularly those people born later. I find this stance from BPers so hypocritical, because you guys are usually against fucking up the environment for the next generation but seem totally ok with fucking up the economy and society for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 11:24 PM
2

False, you agreed BP philosophy of under valuing urself and being overly trust worthy is inferior to caution and self worth. So even you agree RP increases your chances.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 11:01 PM
6

women understand these facts quite well so if a man goes into a relationship without understanding them he will devalue himself, overvalue the woman and not understand her motives at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 10:08 PM
3

Well that's what redpill teaches to you are conceding that it puts men in a better postion.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 10:03 PM
5

a praxeology for understanding male and female intersexual dating and relationship dynamics
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 09:48 PM
4

No that isn't redpill that's not what you aren't getting. Any youtuber saying do "x y and z" isnt giving redpill advice, that is a redpiller giving advice. Redpill is simply the facts about men and women, no prescriptive arguments, no ideological stances, no instruction, no solutions. In regards to your questions, I don't know, its probably impossible to know and its not important. One of the core tenants of RP is that its not seeking to change society through recruitment, its a set of truths me…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 09:48 PM
7

Literally one of the most common red pill tenants is that you should not live for women. You guys really have no idea what you are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 09:36 PM
6

But they are doing all this for something which is actively hurting their chances. Objectively untrue. even if you dont like the conclusions red pill comes to its a fact that you are always going to have better odds if you come into relationships with people with a sense of self value and caution over being overly trusting and having low self worth. What you are doing is conflating RP content not successfully helping every guy with RP not working, some guys just will never be successful with wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 09:34 PM
3

That's not what redpil is lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 09:30 PM
6

Redpill is not a fix, its a way of understanding human psychology, peoples arguments about what you should/shouldn't do isn't red pill its just their opinion. Also because of this there is no "worth" or "not worth", as no one can tell any other adult whether or not its worth it for them to know harsh truths, that's a personal decision you make for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 09:30 PM
1

Its a problem because the vast majority of people only have 1 maybe 2 social circles and the vast majority of men are not going to find success with the first girl they approach, so its effectively locking off the chances of finding a relationship within a social circle. Then when you add that most women are against cold approaches, and how bad dating apps are; it pretty much leaves the avg guy with no right answer as to how hes meant to find a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 06:11 PM
2

Ok but how many social circles are people generally apart of usually one maybe 2, 3 id say is upper bounds. If you say its only appropriate for a guy to try to date 1 or 2 girls per social circle, you are effectively proving OP and what a lot of RPers have said in the comments that you are effectively just closing off all routes for men to approach women, since the vast majority of men will be rejected by the 1st and 2nd girl they approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 05:57 PM
4

No women definitely have a problem with it, it just kicks in when you date more then one girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 02:52 AM
4

but that doesnt mean women like it
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 02:49 AM
0

no it isnt and no they are not. RP recognises that biology benefits some more then others but sees that ultimately most guys can with work get decent returns. BP just believes everything is biologically determined by your looks alone. Moreover what even is this post you are clearly a black piller so own up to that at the beginning of your post instead of pretending like you are making a unbiased critique of redpill.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 06:57 PM
6

, it’s nothing more than biological determinism disguised as self-improvement.# Its actually the opposite that is blackpill
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 06:08 PM
-3

No they don't women tell each other that all men are bad, women never check each other because women don't want honest friends they want emotionally validating friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 06:04 PM
1

thats not equivalent, women report feeling always at risk of potential sexual abuse, really bad hazing really only happens to minority of pledges since most guys that pledge a frat are the type of guy that has the assertiveness not to feel like they are at risk of being bullied.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 03:53 PM
2

But yes, some men are dangerous, no one is really sure which ones and this is why it's fun. No this is wrong. Most men can point out a predator, hence why most of these guys have very few friends. Women don't know which guy is dangerous because women don't put in any effort to really get to know or understand men at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 03:50 PM
5

Its the the combo thats the issue, you can make a anamatronic robot that has the right features that intergrates an llm but its gonna be like the price of an expensive car. We just need the tech to get cheaper at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 07:54 PM
4

Bro look around you we already have good llms with natural human sounding voices, that can hold conversations etc. In fact there are already ppl falling in love and dating them right now. So the emotional connection part of this problem is already solved. The part we are waiting for its just physically making a sex doll that's decently priced, has a decent feel, customisable and maybe animatronic to a degree. This is coming within 10 years easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 07:11 PM
10

From their perspective, men are only going to get this robot because they can make it do things that no real human woman would do (or that no real human man could legally do to another human being. But this is ridiculous we get robots to do this in all other facets of life. People make manufacturing robots so they can pay them nothing and work 24/7, we have robots that will blow themselves up etc. We have always made robots to do the things that humans do not want to do. No this is not about tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 07:02 PM
1

in the face of a chaste woman, but most of these religions then place the blame of being a coomer on the woman if she is showing skin and claim she is intentionally tempting the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 10:35 PM
1

Well then its not hypocrisy since most of these religions hold men and women to different standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 06:39 PM
9

no one is going to spend the money to make convincing bots that like random girls posts, the botting would be how it is now, really obvious fake women who sent links for porn websites. Bots wont provide women with any validation.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 06:34 PM
1

so if your husband wanted to watch porn you would be ok with that, since he doesn't have to put up with jealousy?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 11:19 PM
1

so then why are you talking about cafes and restaurants
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 11:16 PM
1

I don’t count going to a cafe or restaurant as “girls night”. What are you saying
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 10:59 PM
1

This isn't a yes, no, or even anything close to an answer to my question. Address the point. Are you willing to give up going on nights out without him and not wearing any revealing clothes maybe even restrict ur Instagram if its not already to just friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 10:58 PM
1

are you willing to give both up if he gives up porn
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 09:55 PM
1

would you be ok with not wearing revealing clothing and not going on girls nights out while in the relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 05:37 AM
1

Its her problem not his, so its on her to he the impetus to find a solution. It's kind of like how when you have a leaky faucet, it's on the Tenant to report it to the landlord not the landlord to check the house every day for issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 03:57 AM
0

If he says yes would you agree to take down any bikini pictures, and stop wearing revealing clothing for the duration of the relationship, stop going on girls nights out without him etc?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 03:52 AM

This is really a bad question tho ur not really asking if men want submission or independence, ur asking if men to choose between a caricature or a real person. A better question is "do you want a woman that genuinely believes in your judgement and so will trust you when she is unsure vs a woman who is highly independent so if unsure she will take significant convincing to follow your judgment". This comparison is between 2 real people and will show what men actually prefer.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 10:52 PM
1

Firstly your life doesn't matter, you are one person lol, Im also not going to just believe what ur saying without evidence. So stop talking about ur life we are talking about society not you. Secondly its not some parts, its most as I explained in my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 03:56 AM
2

Yes, I've seen the meme of that Instagram post of a woman saying "your money is our money, my money is my money" but never in real life have I seen anyone act that way. I dont believe you, but also objectively most marriages are male breadwinner, most marriages are in demographics where men earn more, men have lower amounts of competition when they earn more and just in general women allways say they care about a man capcity to earn. Also conversely men largely do not care about a woman's earnin…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 03:30 AM
1

Wdym it doesn't exist? The OP is literally a bunch of rights without any accompanying responsibilities and OP claims that this is the definition of old-school feminism. You also cant say the principle is fiction, when you literally agree with it when you say "We're not saying if what your saying is true, women should get it anyways,". At this point you are not arguing in good faith at all, you are just disagreeing because you are triggered.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 03:25 AM
1

My argument is about principles not about any particular situation so I don't need to give an example. Also asking for one is just adhominem, because it shows ur not actually addressing the point, but trying to figure out whether or not im consistent, which is irrelevant to the my actual point that rights should only come with responsibilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 12:57 AM
1

Huh. I've never seen old school feminists that pushed for men to be required to provide for them. This makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 12:54 AM
-1

Rights have responsibilities, OP is a list of 10 rights without any responsibilities therefore I don't agree with it. Thats my argument. Asking what rights go with what responsibility is besides the point, OP is the one who made the list its not my job to fix it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 06:01 PM
-5

No what you have said is gibberish the right to vote was never tied to the responsibility of of provision. You are only saying rights don't come with responsibilities because you are a woman and aren't given as many responsibilities as well as have been told that its wrong for you to have to uphold responsibilities by feminism because feminism just wants to privilege women. All rights come with responsibilities, right to own property comes with financial responsibility of any property you own, r…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 05:58 PM

No you are asking my opinion on something else probably so that you can attack that instead of my argument. Make an argument or support what im saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 05:49 PM
-2

What you are saying is like claiming that two people have an equal ability to travel when one person gets free flights and the other has to pay for their ticket. Equal agency without equal responsibility is privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 05:31 PM
-5

The fact that you are asking that proves my point, rights always come with responsibilities so if you cant even think of any women should have then these are just privileges.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 05:28 PM
2

no because you are asking if i agree with old school feminism, I don't agree with giving women any of these things without responsibilities which is what old school feminism was pushing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 05:27 PM
-12

You are missing the point here. When women didn't have equal pay, men's rights to higher pay came with men's responsibility to be expected to provide. Now that women have equal pay in law there is no social impetus put on women to take up any kind of social responsibility with that capacity to provide, so its effectively a privilege. So the question should not be what responsibilities do men have but what responsibilities have women really gained with their rights?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 05:25 PM
-4

because men have rights with responsibilities
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 05:11 PM
-10

No. I don't disagree with any of the individual points here but the issue with this and all feminist rhetoric is they are only rights. Feminism never talks about or tries to ever impose any partnered/new responsibilities onto women to accompany the rights its asks for, and so all it does is privilege women at the expense of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 04:22 PM
1

ofc they had a choice men did not start loving their daughters or sisters in the 21st century lmao, so if some guy in the tribe tried to rape a woman he would be swiftly beaten and probably killed by that woman's farther, brothers and cousins. Conversely since those men cared about her she would be able to choose someone she liked, its only really royalty that where super restrictive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 05:32 PM
0

but will want a woman that is also attractive and has her shit together But for women to have their shit together the process is not constructive its conservational. As a woman you don't need to go on a journey to build like a man you just need to be raised well, not be a slut, know how to cook and be willing to be submissive to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 05:01 PM
0

Your blind person analogy doesn't work because no one has a right to watch a tv, the TV company didn't have to make TVs to sell it to you, they did so of their own private volition. And actually in the cases where you do have a right to do certain things like voting, its federal law to make poling stations accommodate the disabled. . But this is all besides the point anyway because that argument is already settled, women do not have a federally recognised right to abort. . . Women being able to …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/24 10:09 PM
2

Firstly you cant separate things like that. If it defacto gives women the ability to choose it is giving women ability to choose and that's therefore apart of the moral calculation. But more importantly why do they even get to have that choice? If men can agree to a lifetime of parenting and/or child support in some form at the point of having sex, why do women also not do the same, or at least agree to having to carry the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/24 04:22 AM
0

You're terminally online because you're so emotionally invested in something that does not effect you, that you scoured the internet looking for things you can copy and paste to argue with a stranger These are quotes from you: "ABORTION IS HEALTHCARE I WONT LISTEN TO ANYONE DEBATE THIS" "EVERYONE WHO DISSAGREES WITH ME IS PATHETHETIC" "YOU, NITWITS THAT BELIEVE PAPER ABORTION SHOULD BE AN OPTION" And you are a man aswell lol, this is so embarassing can you not even think of insults that could ki…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/24 04:17 AM
1

Anyone can also get hit by lightning no point talking about edge cases as if they are the majority, childbirth is overwhelmingly safe. You also dont have to keep the kid after you have it, so post partum is not an argument, there are long long waitlists for babies especially now that gay ppl can get married and straight couples are getting married older. . . Legally, parents are not forced to give any part of their body or blood to a child even if they are dying and will die without it. I don’t …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/24 03:10 AM
0

because even bad sex is good sex No this isn't true, bad sex is bad sex, its just as a guy you at least choose to get off in spite of it, women just give up and accept its over.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/24 03:04 AM
1

"terminally online" ur the one arguing that the pro choice movement that constantly talks about womens right to choose when they reproduce(reproductive rights) has nothing to do with the moral principle of parental choice. Secondly uve barely addressed anything ive said and what you have said is just an outright lie. Your argument was verbatim "Abortions are often medically necessary procedures that will result in the death of the mother if not performed" now that ive provided actual data and pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/24 02:51 AM
0

No abortion is a legal right that women have in some states.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/24 01:21 AM
2

You're almost there. There were 3,596,017 pregnancies in 2023. 7% of those, according to your data, resulted in medically necessary abortions, or 251,721. This is dishonest language. If you have a big number, a small % of that big number will also be a big number, it doesn't mean that its evidence of something that statically likely or that happens a often. 240,000 people get struck by lightning globally, should be now pretend like getting hit by lightning is something that happens often since 2…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/24 01:17 AM
2

There is, if a child is conceived a man must pay child support and/or be a part time parent or he will be fined and sometimes jailed.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/24 12:33 AM
0

But you aren't arguing they are just purely different, you are arguing they operate on different moral principles. But you haven't proven that whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/24 12:32 AM
2

they are if the woman gives birth and decides to keep the baby the man must become a parent.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 10:28 PM
1

Lmao you are deeply ignorant. This is an article literal arguing in favour of abortion and even they admit that the numbers are: physical problem with my health(4%) possible problems affecting the health of the fetus (3%) That means 93% of abortions or more then 9 in 10 abortions are not medically necessary at all. Moreover if this where about medically necessary abortions you would all be ok with banning non medically necessary abortions, but you arent because you really want to support the ove…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 10:10 PM
1

The fetus simply lacks personhood. Based on what?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 09:44 PM
2

You can't pick and choose like that. Right to abortion is a legal right not a social advantage, and in the law ther has been great emphasis on bringing up women to be equal to men, therefore men and women must have the same legal responsibilities. The only way what you are saying makes sense if we go back to the time wherein husbands have legal full autonomy over the wives earnings, fathers get default custody, legal to pay women less etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 09:43 PM
0

Abortion is a healthcare procedure, and child support is a legal procedure. Ones right to abortion is not healthcare though so they are the same. . . it is often a vital health service. Not true most abortion patients are young women and are done for convenience, also you don't care about abortions for healthcare.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 09:40 PM
2

neither takes any subsequent action related to reproductive rights Wdym neither the man can't do anything. . . father is free to abandon his child because the mother could have but didn’t take any actions to impede the pregnancy (but also somehow can still claim rights to the child if he desires) Firstly women kill their kids when they find them inconvenient so idk why ur trying to imply some sort of extreme immorality. Secondly the father would not abandon the child he would sacrifice his pater…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 09:33 PM
0

Obviously men have rights to get vasectomies and use condoms and what have you so you’re also wrong on that front So then women dont need abortion rights because they can get hysterectomies. What kind of argument is this? Bodily autonomy does not just end at pregnancy it applies to your agency over your body in all things, that includes whether or not you want to work to provide for a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 09:28 PM
1

Your making a distinction where there is none. Bodily autonomy over whether or not you work to provide or are made to give birth operate on the same moral principle.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 09:21 PM
5

The freedom to choose whether or not they are compelled into being parents after having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 09:21 PM
1

The ethical and moral justification for abortion is rooted in the lack of personhood of a fetus and bodily autonomy. This is all ready a contradiction. If the woman did not consent to having the child by having sex then how can you say the man did as well. The personhood argument is just not real 90% of pro choice people completely ignore this aspect of the debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 09:18 PM
3

you are only saying this becuase you dont have an argument against redpill so you need to straw man it to make it easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 04:55 AM
1

accodring to who? You?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 04:54 AM
1

If you don’t like feminism, you cannot like trp. They behave exactly the same. Wrong redpill is way of understanding an existing world so that you can adapt to it, feminism wants to create and enforce that world a specific world.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 03:14 AM
1

you are just wrong lmao you just completely strawmanned what I said and made up a position that was convenient. You claim here: To me, the phrase "men got the advantage of agency with the disadvantage of responsibility, conversely women got lack of responsibility with lack of ultimate agency" sounds like a direct quote. But whether it is or isn't, these traditional roles are what Red Pillers aspire to. That this is a world I aspired to but left out the fact that i was describing the past and how…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 03:11 AM
-1

bring awareness wont do anything but shorten relationships and prevent them from forming. Monogamy does not come naturally to humans it must be maintained through social stigma and social validation. What we stigmatise and what we validate can be varied but we have to do so to some things, we cannot just let people do whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 09:54 PM
-1

Society needs to get past this phase where men and women are pitted against each other. That requires some dialogue between both sides. We need the exact opposite of things like Fresh & Fit. This is wrong we need stuff like fresh and fit because fresh and fit is part of that conversation, redpill in a big part men expressing what they feel like they disserve in a relationship. And so the only way society can get past this phase is to embrace the fact that men and women's interest are not aligned…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 05:44 AM
0

That is nonsense, if most people ,meaning almost every avg person, was married prior to modernity then society can guarantee it. Also you say artificial like as society is the way it is right now is due to natural choice, thats also nonsense, there where social movements that got government policies to in turn forcefully create the current dating market and society. Moreover society in general is artificial, we aren't all bees from the same colony, our interests are not naturally aligned such th…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 02:47 AM
0

OP said specifically It’s all down to you to become attractive ... there is nothing society can do to fix that or help Here he is claiming that no societal wide change will affect anyone's dating chances. but it would not necessarily increase her organic attraction to/desire for that man. It would simply be a relationship of convenience (and coercion). It actually would because a massive qualifier for a woman to be attracted to man is his capacity to have earn more then her. This is why as women…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 11:16 PM
2

I don't get this weird blue pill gaslighting where you guys try to act like what exists today is just what's always been. My friend nothing else is needed as proven by the centuries prior to modernity wherein the avg men could put in avg effort and get married at a pretty young age to an avg woman and she would never divorce him. So the goal should not be thinking what does the avg man need to do but how can society negatively and positively incentivise the avg woman to accepting avg levels of e…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 07:20 PM
9

But that isnt your argument tho, your words are "It’s all down to you to become attractive.". Yes society cant force people into successful relationships but this does not mean that its all down to the individual and that nothing can be done on a macro level. Society absolutely can massively increase or decrease the attractiveness of getting into a relationship and how most people see most other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 05:56 PM
4

Nah she uses her legal name shows her face and this story about her is known nationwide in the uk. They know they probably just don't care, because they don't care about her.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 09:33 PM
6

but the problem is blaming the men for her fuck ups
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 02:06 AM
12

he will prob burn through all the money quickly by living beyond her means. The black pill about OF that most of these girls never admit, is that most of them are under these management companies that take most if not all of the money and just pay them a flat salary. Also if thye don't have a niece even the successful girls careers usually only last like 5 years and then they go into escorting or camming.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 02:05 AM
1

No that's what you wrote
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 03:57 PM
-1

the past 3 us elections women have been the ones to mostly support the candidate that wants to expand the government and embroil the us in more foreign conflicts. Women in the west also support sending foreign aid to places like ukr the most. Men in general are the ones who support the government spending less money.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 03:37 PM
-1

no
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 03:34 PM
-1

They aren't mutually exclusive. You can be a guy who because of the education system failing boys did not go to college, gets a blue collar job and then ends up still paying more taxes into the system then you use for social welfare benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 03:24 PM
-8

What is the point of a nurse if there is no one to nurse? Also has every nurse added more value in terms of nursing then they have taken out from society? Even just focusing on the medical side of life, can you really claim that a given nurse offset all the time and work it took to educate and train all the nurses doctors, pharmacists etc that provided her healthcare and made sure she was healthy. What about all the hours of research going back to even the fundamentals of the sciences that taugh…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 02:15 AM
0

The point is not about if single men are gonna be violent, the question is whether or not their violence is morally justified. No it isnt becuase A. physical ramifications are more important that philosophical questions, and B. if a large % of young men are violent that defacto justifies it anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 01:57 AM
0

They are not selfish since their kids will be the next generation of tax payers and workers that help maintain society. Like it or nor our economy and culuture is built on the fundamental principle that the population will expand. This is also not a principle that can be changed within a generation or by a shrinking society.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 01:51 AM
1

I am sure you understand that there is never going to be a world where every man who wants a family gets one, there is always going to be some sort of dating/screening process. that is not the aim, the aim is go give enough men a good shot that the ones that want to blow up society dont have enough numbers to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 12:46 AM
-2

I am going down and taking as many idiots as I can with me. Until society finds a way to revive people I am perfectly able to cause more damage than the damage society can do to me. Based and jihad pilled
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 12:45 AM
-7

However that doesn't mean anyone should be compelled to do anything. If you want to be a childless cat lady and have nothing to live for. That is your prerogative. That is entirely your choice. Do you. It's your right to make that bad choice. Nah fuck that, that childless cat lady is still using and has used tax payer facilities as well as just generally enjoyed the fruits of labour of the society as a whole. She can live alone sure but there should be a stigma to doing so, there should be judgm…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 12:43 AM
-4

men pay most of the taxes and use the least amount of its services.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 12:37 AM
-9

Just confused how women don't contribute to it without having children? Simply living your life =/= contribution. Most people are a net drain on society economically and even in terms of productivity most work in most companies/orgs is done by the minority of uber productive people. The real benefit that men bring to society is cededing their capacity for violence to the government and holding the expectation that if need be they will fight for the country. Women hower cannot offer this, if wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 12:36 AM
2

Right now i am spinning my wheels wondering if i want love or even believe in it anymore even if some woman decides to offer me a crumb of love and pussy whether i should believe it or spit in its fact Love is real but that's the problem because love is not the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 11:03 PM
2

red yes blue->red->black->red learned the truth, was massively disheartened by the truth, learned to accept the truth. Im open to considering and engaging with any argument about anything, outside of weird shit like CP. a good argument and evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 10:59 PM
1

My guess is that the men here are younger and not fathers. Is that right? I mean yeah this is a sub that focuses largely on dating, most older men are not single. Also this is a forum on reddit, which is a site again mostly populated by younger single men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 10:56 PM
0

I don’t believe there is any strategic advantage to having Ukrainian babies right now while the state of the war and the nation’s future is undecided. More extremely vulnerable members of society are not helpful at the moment. What about after the war tho? Would you be infavour of ukr putting a tax on single women between 18 and 45 who have no children and/or Ukr asking its allied nations to revoke the refugee status of the young women that fled the country
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 09:24 PM

But now? Now in the world where women are overwhelmingly misandrists who hate men, and are unpleasant, entitled, and narcissistic beyond imagination, the only solution is to just say NO to the traditional role of the betabux. Instead, men should tell themselves the cold hard truth, and instead turn to transactional relationships. No they should just improve instead. If you are successful in business you have decent social skills, you might not be able to apply them romantically but you have them…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 04:09 PM
-1

How long do you think is long enough to actually know someone, and trust them with your body- especially if they are bigger and stronger than you? no idea which is one of the issues with the modern world that feminist have created. Women use to be able to rely on the fact that their dad could vet men approaching them because any guy approaching you to fuck around wouldn't out of fear of him. Now you guys have to do all this urself. If I wasn't sincerely interested than why would I be testing to …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 06:50 PM
1

To play your best hand such that you can get the most attractive women that will treat you the best inside a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 04:49 PM
4

I can tell you from experience if someone is taking their time with you and not hurrying you to bed but still talking to you often, making jokes, etc- they probably want to get there and are sincerely interested. I only rushed to bed with people at my lowest when I was desperate to feel something and those were all empty interactions I regretted. You cant really make this claim because conversely a lot of women who have no real sexual interest will string a guy along because he meets their emoti…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 04:46 PM
5

its not radically different its just further along the same road
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 04:24 PM
2

https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/living-single/202008/half-of-all-single-people-just-dont-want-a-relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 05:52 PM
3

Because the men it doesn't work for have largely just given up trying to date at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 04:18 AM
3

I don’t think those men want to provide anyway, I think they want the fantasy of someone they can control. But it’s just a fantasy. Projection, you are only saying this because you know this is how you would act in this situation. Because you are a woman who isn't use to ever having power over ppl. Like you were saying before, in this situation, that woman would really want nothing to do with you. The kept traditional woman is really the one that only wants you for your money. She can’t live if …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:49 PM
2

How is it not 50/50 if a woman chooses a man that makes as much than her? That’s the definition of 50/50. It seems to me that the big issue here is the stupidity of having children. Because he had to earn enough to be considered by her she did not have to earn anything to be considered by him. Also just because hes not providing as a breadwinner doesn't mean that there is any less pressure, if she picked him because of his earnings its highly unlikely she is going to be ok with him loosing his j…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 06:46 PM
2

None of it is really equipt to help men, the problem is the whole field has oriented itself around women and the female mind. Psychology as a field really needs to have some sort of masculine straight man inclusivity quotas to really have any hope.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 06:00 PM
0

I feel like there is a dichotomy between red pill men who say they feel there is too much pressure on them to be successful and rich to attract a woman, but also want women to adopt the submissive role and rely on them. The problem here is you are applying woman communication to men. When men talk about things we talk about them directly and very rarely implicitly. So when men talk about pressure to provide we are not implying that its too much or a burden that we do not want, we are saying it i…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 05:30 PM
3

so if western society decided to return to a relationship dynamics like that in the middle east you would accept this as what is fair?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 11:54 AM
2

women need to date in their league because its the only way they will have meaningful relationships and more importantly its better for society to not have a bunch of young single sexless men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 11:52 AM

Responding to the title: If the concept of dating can be destroyed by a woman's sense of self and self-preservation, then that concept of dating deserves to be destroyed. No becuase women do not exist in a vacuum unto themselves, if women start thinking exclusively for themselves at the complete expense of men, all that leads to is a race to the bottom. Women like men must make efforts to sacrifice for the other to demonstrate good faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 08:06 AM

also a massive thing this stat is missing is the context that the late 40s is right after the largest global war in human history. So its not supprising women where unsatisified in thier marriages all the guys they actually wanted to date where blown up or came home with ptsd.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 08:02 AM

I'm not so sure there was ever a golden age of dating as the men here seem to imagine it. Wtf lol, for most of the Christianised western worlds history most men where married to their looks match and had multiple kids. The Golden age absolutely did exist feminism and progressive values as a whole just ousted the Christian routed values that ensured monogamy and thus ensured the best outcome for the avg man. in the late 40's large scale anonymous sex surveys were conducted that found that. 77% of…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 07:55 AM
1

they have a lot of people on thier show lol, theyve had destiny on thier show whos a progressive BPer.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 10:56 PM
-5

I think that's a incorrect characterisation of womens media. We as men have media pushed in our faces, our media is co-opted by trans, women and gay men who hate the avg straight man and endlessly try to force highly unpopular themes and elements into our spaces. You women have media made for and by you, by women and gays that largely align with the avg woman ideologically.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 03:41 PM
-2

No ive read maybe 1 article online in my entire life. Women's media unlike mens media does not have activists inside it forcing it to appeal to the opposite gender, so i like most men have consumed almost none of even the most popular of women's entertainment.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 02:29 PM
2

One of the things is media. Look at what clothes women in the media are wearing. Look at the ads, look at what looks the media is showning as feminine, what the media says how a woman should look. So it is no wonder that women might dress provocativelly because all around they are bieng told that this is how a woman looks and you need to look like that to feel like a woman. I get this is media made for men, but is there not stuff made for women where ur just dressed normally?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 01:35 PM
0

so he will need to sufficiently lower his standards No its the opposite, guys need to leverage themselves better. Women genuinely value commitment so if a man puts that on the table up front with hard line terms and conditions he can truly secure, its just most guys chase the slimmest chances of success in getting what they want and show way too much desperation.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 02:34 AM
10

Difference is for men, a lot of them don't rate staying single as a good option. Lmao its the opposite. Most women are never truly single ur always on tail end, at the beginning off or in the middle of some kind of romantic relationship. Even if its just the degs of a lost love or some guy texting you, uve almost allways got somone. Men are actually single, men will actually involuntarily go months and months without any woman even giving him a 2nd glance. That being said, you can be very succes…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 02:30 AM
1

Virtually every woman knows she could hop on an app and get dates within a few minutes. They. Know. There is no reason for a woman to entertain an average man in real life any more than on apps. 90% of the guys on there she doesnt find attractive, and the ones she does are ones she knows definitely just want sex. Plus she has no idea who these men are. The guy in real life she knows is not some dangerous murder aswell as having a good chance that hes actually down for commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 02:25 AM

Remember when MGTOW swore the west was going to fall apart because men would dropping out of love and relationships in droves? It's the same thing here. The vast majority of men and women want to fall in love and be with one another. This is unlike 4b is literally happening right now lmao and they were 100% correct. The west absolutely is reeling from young mens lack of engagement in society. They even speak about this on mainstream news. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnuprsO2-nc
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 06:34 PM

p2025 is not trumps agenda he has his own agenda on his website. P2025 was created completely independent of him by a think tank. You have been lied to. Also women cant do 4b becuase women largely do not fuck the avg man casually so there would be nothing to remove, and u dont have the same cultural background which informed 4b, its literally completely different.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 01:43 AM

im not saying they are, im saying that you cant look at relationships over all for stuff like this becuase older generations had very different social dynamics that do not exist today for younger people.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 10:46 PM

look at that same chart, "Foreign born" has husband primary breadwinner at 61% whereas "us born" is only at 53% and inline with other trends. So its immigrants who are skewing the numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 10:45 PM

The reason is when men can out earn women, women prefer to marry those who out earn them. This is why even tho male breadwinner marriages are decreasing, the demographics where men can still out earn women, like college educated, still have higher rates of marriage then those demographics where there is more earnings equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 10:29 PM

Both egalitarian and female breadwinner marriages have been increasing over time, also male breadwinner has been decreasing. So its not true to say younger couples are more likely then older couples to be male breadwinner. I think you are probably looking at the differences between new marrages of old vs young people which isn't what im talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 10:27 PM

And the majority of marriages are male breadwinner, do you also think that is reflective of the prospects for people in the current dating market? You cant just look at majority becuase majority includes people of several generations that are unaffected by todays dating and relationship trends.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 09:43 PM

Learning these sorts of truths when you previously believed in the fantasies we are all taught will never be easy. Also its better to learn it abruptly becuase the lies are so pervasive in society that if you aren't forced to accept the truth immediately and upfront, you will just come up some cope and rationalise a way to deny them. Look at all the blue pill push back to just the ideas RP talks about, ignore all the podcasts and interviews etc. The avg BP man or woman will literally call you an…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 09:41 PM
8

Men are actually not more emotionally expressive now, not sure why you would think that. Actually, displays of emotion like open weeping as well as platonic physical affection between men was much more accepted prior to the 20th century or so. They literally are and the argument that they aren't becuase they aren't expressing their emotions like women is a complete false dichotomy. Men are treated as beings without inherent value, they must have a "purpose" or a "utility" or else they are isolat…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 01:36 AM
5

It doesnt at all and you prove it, feminist only want to help men when they are victims in spite of masculinity becuase feminist believe that patriarchy causes all problems in society(or at least a lot), so when men are victims becuase they are typically masculine men or when masculinity is not at the root cause of the issue feminists will ignore the issue or try to come up with some other explanation. Your example shows this. Young men today are the most emotionally expressive they have ever be…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 11:48 PM
1

Ok but lets not pretend like feminists dont have a storied history of protesting men's rights movements. I remember like 10 years ago MRA's would hold just pure men's advocacy conferences where they wouldn't talk redpill, conservatism, mgtow; just purely focused on men's mental health issues like suicide divorce homelessness etc and they would regularly get feminists protesting outside and pulling fire alarms. Progressives and feminist hate and are ideologically apposed to true men's advocacy be…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 11:00 PM
5

Its never going to happen becuase fundamentally actual advocacy for men means conceding central principles progressives fought for where wrong. Maybe a progressive left that isn't ideologically actually what we would consider progressive but just uses the term could advocate for men, but for the current movement its just impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 10:55 PM
4

That all men prefer casual sex with a variety of women. This is true, most men just have never had the opportunity to do it or they have but dont have the time and/or energy to balance multiple full relationships. However for sure atleast 70-80% of men would prefer having a main girl and a side chick or two, rather then just one girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/24 03:27 PM
2

You ask the avg woman any contentious issue that feminism has a strong stance on and 6-7 out of 10 of them will tell you they believe in the feminist position. Most women absolutely are blue haired feminists they just wont constantly speak about feminism becuase they aren't interested in politics.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 07:53 PM
1

#killallmen and the whole "i choose the bear" show that most women are blue haired feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 07:16 PM
1

and not all legal abortions would result in a child being born, id argue that women knowing the farther could 100% abandon them with no hope of child support you would see way less women taking pregnancies to term.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 06:02 PM
-1

Why must I “pay to maintain equality”? Paying for ramps for disabled people is you paying to maintain equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 12:31 PM
4

When a child is aborted, you're not "giving it up" to someone else to take care of. One it's aborted, no one has to take care of it. It's resolved. Im not talking about those times, im talking about the times wherein a mother decides she doesnt want to be a mother but doesnt want the abortion, so she gives birth and gives the child up to a fire station or leaves it in the hospital. All you're saying here is "if SOME solutions work, why can't people try ALL solutions???" The answer is because som…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 12:30 PM
3

Becuase civil rights need to be available to all that they can apply to. Are you against paying for ramps so disabled people can vote or access hospitals?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 12:22 PM
4

True but the same applies in the same amount of cases mothers give their kids up for abortion. So either we remove all parental choice or we allow it all.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 12:12 PM
1

Why does the FATHER get to opt out of paying for their own child but I don't get to opt out of paying for his child? You are talking like this is new but this is already an option, if both mother and farther dont want to be parents they can give the child up for adoption wherein you will be paying for the kid that way aswell in the foster system. But moreso the reason you dont get to opt out is becuase as adults its our moral responsibility to maintain a good standard of living for all children …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 12:08 PM
3

Firstly regardless of if a financial abortion existed, if the mother or both parents wanted to give up the child you would be paying anyway via the foster system. Secondly you must pay to maintain equality, its not right to allow for parental choice only for women and not men. So if you really dont want to pay then you should support scraping the foster system any child care subsidies etc and get rid of abortion for all.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 12:05 PM
9

Providing a good life for all children is one of the only things government funds should ever be used for.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 12:01 PM
1

THe overwhelming majority of men would genuinely appreciate being approached. The problem is becuase women are so fearful of rejection, they only approach the most attractive guys they think they have a shot with becuase they dont see it as worth it otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 01:10 AM
1

Nah that's definitely making a move lol. A first move is not contingent on it actually leading anywhere successfully its just the first move made to show clear and overt romantic attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 01:07 AM
1

"as a red pill or purple pill"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 08:54 PM
1

No its mostly fear of rejection. when women find you attractive it doesnt matter if they dont know you they will approach you if they find you attractive enough, but as I said for the majority of guys they are attracted to that attraction is simply not enough to overcome their fear of having thier pride hurt so they dont approach. Its not likely the only reason is the guy is not attractive enough becuase out of 10 guys a girl would actually be attracted to shes only going to approach the top 1 o…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 01:26 AM
1

I think Fear of rejection feeds into this aswell. Women only approach the top % of guys becuase those are the ones where they feel its worth risking rejection becuase they find the guy so attractive, the rest of the guys they might consider just aren't attractive enough to take the hit to their egos.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 01:39 AM
1

They end up reimbursing him for the ring. If they didn’t, most of these men would not propose lol. It’s similar to how when a man gets her flowers, she will venmo him back for it. It doesn’t come “free”, she essentially pays for it. Lmao you are just making shit up. Where is your study showing that most men will Venmo women for flowers or that they will ask for reimbursement for an engagement ring. Yes, but those women are paying for their own half of the rent/mortgage.. so it’s still 50/50. No …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 04:28 AM
5

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/04/13/in-a-growing-share-of-u-s-marriages-husbands-and-wives-earn-about-the-same/st_2023-04-13_breadwinner-wives_01-png/ Most women do not pay for their own engagement rings, that doesnt even make sense lol. Also paying for small things within a relationship like gas or food at a restaurant is nothing if the other person is paying most of the mortgage/rent.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 04:04 AM
1

Not anymore because a lot of women split the finances 50/50 with their husband. Only 30% of marriages are 50/50
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 03:47 AM
2

First the cost is out of reach for most men let alone most young men who are broke. In my experience in the USA, Australia and Europe with escorts is if you want half way decent looking one, they charge at minimum $800 US dollars. Maybe if ur trying to fuck ur favourite in demand pornstar lol, but a quick search will show the prices are around $200 per hour in most places. Anything below that you start getting some really disgusting looking women in my experience Out of all the things to come on…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 03:47 AM
8

Dont trust OP lmao even in a place like Miami the avg price of escorts is $200, the only prostitutes that cost around $800 per hour are going to be like Instagram girls or pornstars. Moreover price is definitely not going to tell you if a girl has been trafficked. Also OPs math is wrong, the novelty of being able to fuck different women who are way out of your league easily counts for like 3x a gf especially long term.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 03:45 AM
0

his prices are way off in the US aswell most hookers charge like $200 per hour. Idk why but this guy is actually lying about having sex with prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 03:40 AM
1

some guys might prefer this but the vast majority will not care about a woman being a virgin at all. Like most things you can do as a woman its not a matter of making urself more attractive as most women are born with enough of what men want, its about not ruining that value.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 03:30 AM
2

incorrect, clear isn't abscence of light, clear is an open passage for light.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 03:27 PM
0

If he wanted his own custom meaning flair he should have done what you did and make one up.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 03:26 PM
1

But redpills are talking about this now. Undesrtand that this does not exist in a vacuum, RP will kill itself if it works. Because it makes the market more competitive by default. Each RP one year late has it harder than the previous, and the previous and so forth. No it wont. Redpill recognises that most men are BP aswell as largely simps, also again since its a praxeology it doesnt actually seek to change this fact, therefore there is no "if redpill workings" becuase redpill has no goals outsi…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 02:48 PM
8

a Black piller talking about crying is rich lol, all you guys do is cry and whine about how u dont get women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 01:51 AM
7

Just becuase red pill talks about social problems does not mean its giving social solutions. Redpill is a praxeology meant to educate men on intersexual dynamics, thats it, what those men do or what they recommend others do is purely their own ideas as individuals. Modern society preaches women's independence for men, yet your whole thought process is shackling a mans life to become more appealing to women? The current system says you're not needed, yet your solution to this is to simply complai…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 01:50 AM
3

Some people find that it provides them with a sense of status to have a partner that everyone finds attractive. But that presumes that status is something that you find attractive in a partner which most men do not.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 12:05 AM
3

no option 1 only comes with 1 there will be no strong sexual chemistry or a lot of sex
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/24 01:44 AM
3

you should put an edit in the bottom becuase most people are saying 1 becuase they think they get both
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/24 01:44 AM
3

Option 2. I have no hard desire for a deep romantic emotional connection, im not 13. Also i already have hours long intellectually stimulating conversations with my friends. I really dont need that from a woman. Sex is really the thing I want from women in a relationship the other stuff is conditionally important.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/24 01:43 AM
3

1 comes with no sex tho
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/24 01:43 AM
-5

Male suffrage came with the draft, so most women did not want things like the right to vote becuase of all the responsibilities they then thought they would have to adopt with it. Feminism really only benefited masculine women, the rest have had declining happiness and satisfaction decade after decade.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 11:38 PM
-3

Lmao no, feminism exist so that businesses and government could devalue labour costs while increasing productivity and tax revenue. Traditional values worked very well and most women did not want to the rights feminist was fighting for.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 11:31 PM
0

No institution can tell you what you as an individual are doing wrong. Absolute horse shit people use to have kids at like 21, dating advice use to be extremely effective, the problem is we broke society becuase of feminism and there is a reluctance to actually give good general advice and/or orient society such that we can go back to giving good general advice becuase that would mean accepting feminism got a lot wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 06:12 PM

For body count, nobody is required to divulge that information unprompted and anyone is able to ask a potential partner. If someone doesn’t want the other person to know, they can (and should) refuse to answer. If they lied about it (male or female) it’s immoral. Then there is nothing wrong with a guy not divulging if he has sex with a prostitutes. It is easy to tell when someone is wearing makeup. It’s not deceptive if you know appearance enhancers are being used, but even if you disagree there…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 08:47 PM

And I'm sure you're thinking, sure, but I don't have to tell her or I could just lie. And that's true, you could...if you want to be a terrible person who has a relationship based entirely on lies that knows their partners would despise the real them. Lmao should women be upfront about body count then? Also what about makeup and flattering posses? Most guys are incapable of really imagining what most women look like without makeup, should all women go bare faced and have Tpose pictures on Instag…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 06:36 PM
3

yes violent crime is generally on a downward trend
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 02:13 AM
8

I think its more about behaviours, sexual predators tend to try to predate on similar types of women they identify as vulnerable. I think that predator interprets female promiscuity it as a woman who is low self esteem who is using her body to get attention from the men she likes but who wouldn't pat attention to her without easy access to her body.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 05:38 AM
1

pre requisite, very few men can actually love a woman without being sexually attracted and reasonably sexually satisfied by her. A good relationship can make sex better but it does not mean that sex is a product of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 06:53 PM
1

But this presumes that if the sex got bad that the relationship would still be good which is not true. Moreover plenty of bad relationships have good sex. You are mistaking a good relationship being something that can make sex better, as being the thing that produces good sex. The sex is a prerequisite becuase without it the relationship crumbles.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 06:52 PM
5

And you think men act better when they have more money and therefore power Generally yes most people do even women which is why they prefer male bosses to female ones. Men due to our biology gives us the capability of serious violence which is a very baseline intrinsically understandable form of power that we just grow up with, and therefore we learn through trial, error, fear confidence and experience how to wield that power such that we dont get are asses beat or turn everyone around us fearfu…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 01:46 PM
4

When men have more money they get to be the man of the house yet when women make more money they’re still expected to act submissive. I’m not saying women who are breadwinners should be annoying, I’m just pointing out that there’s a difference. Submissive is only one way to act that is acceptable, the problem is women are terrible with power and so if thye take any kind of dominance over a man they just dont know how to have the grace to be fair with that power. Also women dont like feeling supe…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 01:21 AM

rredpill is not an idealogy is a praexeology, so it doesnt tell you what to do it gives you insights and information and then you decide how you want to act accordingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/24 01:53 AM
4

The problem isnt the cheating, the problem with your analogy is you are only looking at it from the angle of offense caused to the woman then communicating that. The important part is whether or not its valid for a man to want to know paternity simply for its own sake and whether a woman is justified denying that knowledge. Her feelings are unimportant as feelings do not negate moral justifications. For example if it would really offend your bank teller if you wanted to see a statement of your a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 02:29 AM
1

this is the same thing both people can be affected (by not being the father, by being infected with an std) without knowing it Its not becuase without symptoms the woman would not know she has an std. So its one person who doesnt know asking another person who doesnt know to confirm for the both of them. In the instance of paternity its one person who doesnt know asking someone who knows to confirm for the first person. uh well if the woman knows hes not the father or may not be the father and s…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 02:23 AM
1

its not like the STDs at all. Men can never know paternity without a test women can, whereas with stds the woman could have one witohut knowing herself. So in the first case its one person with knowledge asking the other just to trust them on this monumental life moment, in the other its someone who potentially doesnt have absolute knowledge asking someone else who doesnt have it either to trust them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 10:20 PM
7

The std test comparison doesnt work becuase you are thinking about this only from the woman's perspective of simply what request would cause equal offense but you are ignoring that there is also the mans side whereby he simply doesnt know if that kid is his without the test whereas the woman does. In the case of STD's the woman wouldn't know whether or not she had an std and neither would the man so there really is not that element where someone who has knowledge is asking someone who doesnt to …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 10:16 PM

Well worth is a relative to the market its in. If a bunch of people give what you have for free then its simply not worth anything, also we dont really see our sexuality as an valuable part of who they are, for us its largely a means to an end.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 01:23 AM

No one views it as a conquest its just a natural reaction. Men who where ok with sleaping with promiscuous women in the past raised other mens kids more often, that happens over a couple 100ks years, you get almost no guys who are into promiscuous women becuase they ahve been out bred. This is what it is men just have a natural aversion to this behaviour like women have a natural aversion to timid men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 01:19 AM
2

The truth can be wielded in a harmful way like anything else. if someone says something mean to me, it may be true that they hurt my feelings, but that doesn't mean the best course of action is to go punch them in the face. But say what this person said was really offensive it would be reasonable that you might want to punch them in the face, and so why is it anyones right to remove that choice from you. This is my issue with BP you accept that RP is correct you just dont like men taking those t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 07:36 PM
4

This is the irony of blue pill they are so quick to retort against RP But then the moment you ask "so what do you recommend" they say "i have no idea you have to figure it out on your own" which the avg guy is clearly not going to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 07:16 PM
2

I'm mostly bluepill and denying that this is true is pretty much delusional. The sexual marketplace is inherently amoral, but you don't have to be a dick about it to play the game well. Women like respectful and responsible men who are also masculine and dominant, it's just that those traits tend to correlate with less responsible men. This isnt the case. The traits do not correlate, "less responsibility" correlates with leverage not simply dominance and masculinity. Men who are more physically …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 07:10 PM
3

is this ad admission that the truth is harmful lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 07:08 PM
1

Why cant you love or be attracted to a man you dont respect?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 07:05 PM
1

Submissiveness as a personal trait is a negative one though. It can be read as a lack of maturity, independence or the ability to hold proper boundaries. Realistically if you rely on your partner to make all important decisions, they have to carry on a greater load. A lot of people of both genders aren’t really okay with it, because they want to have a functioning partner, not a dependent. No its only negative if you are also submissive and/or you want someone who will challenge you. A lot of pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 07:03 PM
-9

Its not indisputable becuase we have no idea what these guys accounts where, this woman might not have memory of the event but it could very well be she was just conscious but drugged maybe on ghb. So if her husband puts out a post on a sex website looking for guys to do a gangbang and ur the 15th guy coming in and she seems to be enjoying herself but obviously on something ur just going to think this is just another swinger becuase a lot of these people like to get high and have pretty crazy se…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 03:09 AM
-12

As for men in general, I don't know. This case is extremely troubling to me. That you could let that number of men even know about the rape happening without one of them running to the police is disturbing. I'm assuming they didn't just tell them right off the bat what was going on and there is a period of feeling them out to see if they're ok with it before letting them in on what's happening, but still. Did thye all know tho for sure? It could very well be that they just assumed it was some fe…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 02:27 AM
9

id argue of is more degrading becuase you can actually message and talk to the girl, which a lot of guys use to just say insane shit to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 12:04 AM
3

Just becuase you dont find it funny doesnt mean it isnt a joke or that its fucked up. Jokes are only fucked up if the intention is to be mean spirited malicious or hurtful, words and statements alone are just that. Also every man evaluates every woman sexually. But if its any solice men typically wont treat a woman like shit becuase shes not attractive, if they treat her like shit its becuase her personality outside of that is off-putting in some way.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 06:20 PM
2

No it really is rare becuase most guys do not see their sex life as apart of the same box as the topics they discuss with their friends. Also its seen as really childish to talk about sex like women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 06:06 PM
2

It doesnt make any sense. BP especially on this sub is massively centred around the argument that enabling women's sexual freedom should come at any cost to the incentive structure to monogamy, ive even seen BPers say this to the extent that it should be pursued even if society collapses due to low birth rates. So its crazy to turn around and be like "we need to incentivise monogamy this is bad" when its something that lowers womens bargaining position and increases mens freedom. To copy quote a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 03:44 PM
11

Lmao its so typical for a BPer to be against something like this. Where did all that support for sexual liberation go? You guys only care about sexual liberation if its benefits women and disadvantages men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 03:31 PM
6

Its highly rare, men mostly never talk about women they just had sex with unless maybe you asked for advice and its an update.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 02:12 AM
37

Locker room talk is a myth. Men do speak differently when not around women but its mostly just discussing politically incorrect topics, making jokes women would whine about being offensive etc and sometimes women but almost never women they actually know and definitely not women you just had sex with. Mens conversations are usually about things not people.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 02:11 AM
1

Lol you actually just explained why you are wrong. Its not that men dont offer enough, its that women's sexuality is partly attraction to overmatching in resource acquisition and status. Or in other words women are genetically gold diggers and a mans money is like a woman's phat ass. This is why in demographics where men can out earn and have higher status then women, even in those cases where women are already well off economically or of high status, they have way higher marriage rates. Becuase…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 02:02 AM

Society, its illegal to exclude people based on sex and even if you could figure out some loophole society around you would step in and label you a sexist and an incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 08:32 PM

you clearly dont care
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 07:43 PM

No any time a men do so with policy they will be arrested for sexist discrimination and anytime they do so in the culture greater society comes in and puts enormous social pressure on the people in charge to change the culture to accommodate women. Society at large must make these spaces becuase only with societies blessing can they exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 06:06 PM

Becuase its not a solution its just idealism and fantasy. If society isn't working for people who are otherwise avg the solution is not to brow beat them, its to change society to accommodate those avg ppl. Its not men who have to change its society.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 05:03 PM

This is good personal advice but OP asked what people should do as in what society ought to do, and if society keeps going as it is it will just collapse as most men are not going to take the initiative to improve they will just regress.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 04:24 PM

Isn't it sad that you dont know, we as a society are so use to not giving a fuck about men that when they have problems you have no idea how to help and they have no idea how to articulate their problems. I dont have all the answers but one I think is vitally important is men's spaces. We need to put in an effort to create social spaces that specifically exclude women because women will always find male spaces abrasive and feel entitled to concessions to accommodate them. If we had more men's cl…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 04:22 PM

thats a terrible advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 04:12 PM
-4

Failing to realize that most women have absolutely had their hearts broken by the nerdy guy. No most guys are simps for women who at least close their smv match, that nerdy guy was probably a contextual chad where in that social circle he had a lot of status. So its not really a "nerdy guy" you picked the guy a bunch of other girls want and then you complain when he does the thing that attracted you in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 02:00 AM
0

becuase of %. The avg woman hating man hates women becuase of how a massive % of the female population acts, the avg man hating woman hates men becuase of how a minority of men act that they choose to associate with.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 01:53 AM
1

Most men benefit most from a monogamous sexual market place, however women wanted to destroy it so they could have "sexual freedom".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 01:30 AM
1

No one needs grifters to remind them to work on their physical health, that's universally understood. most adults are fat, so actually most people do need somone to motivate and teach them how to work out. The only secret is learning how to make friends and how to flirt, and TRP doesn't teach either. Thats not the only thing you need lmao, firstly if your out of shape and poor ur not going to be able to maximise the quality of woman you can get, you also wont understand female nature and so how …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 01:27 AM
1

Thats like saying "learning that you got your defrauded caused depression". RP does not cause these problems BP does, RP just allows men to be aware of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 01:21 AM
3

hes getting understanding of frank truths that blue pill will lie to him about to enable womens freedoms at the expense of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 12:50 PM
6

there is no way to prevent it, you just have to go through it. Redpill rage is apart of a lot of guys journey to acceptance. Maybe try to make friends with some women, that way you can atleast women maintain a human face to you as you learn more.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 12:49 PM

splc is not credible lol there an activist organisation at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 01:55 PM
0

And we are all supposed to just trust you but more importantly we are supposed to trust with 0 evidence that this man created the red pill concept of hypergamy or that hes actually a white nationalist. Moreover on that you have yet to state how RP hypergamy is different from scientific hypergamy. Even if I ignore all that and grant all the claims you made are correct, you have yet to prove that devlin represents RP. Your entire argument is built on dishonesty.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 03:36 AM
2

Ok so i googled this book, it was published in 2015, in no way was this the origin of hypergamy in the redpill lol, im pretty sure RP started in the late 90s. Also rollos the rational male came out in 2013. I swear BPers just make shit up half the time. If ur going to criticise something you have to at least concede that its telling the truth about itself, otherwise everything you say is straw man.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 02:14 AM
2

That doesnt make it true lol. Idk why you guys allways go to take or sneako, how hard is it to just watch a rollo video or somone else who has really been RP and still self IDs as RP. BPers allways use arguments from people who arent RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 02:02 AM
0

There not experimenting. They like the women they just dont see them as viable wives.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 01:31 AM
4

was going to say these types of guys are just looking for easier relationships with women who are more mature but they largely do not see the women as viable wives.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 05:08 PM
2

idk who you are trying to lie to. You are literally just making shit up out of thin air. You have no idea what redpill is beyond some vague impression given to you by people that hate redpill. Thats all this is and you cant prove otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 08:17 PM
1

No it isnt thats just a convient straw man you made up.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 08:06 PM
1

You say that like its some condemnation lol. Redpill is not a ideological value system its a praxeology for an individual to better their own personal standing, its entirely practical focused and is not in anyway trying to change society. So its literally part of the point of redpill not to talk about redpill. This is also why ur cope about RPers being single is sexless or not in relationships is bullshit, bc unlike normal guys RP aware guys know exactly how best to sell women a dream.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 07:39 PM
0

you are only easily replaceable if you aren't a charismatic person
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 04:46 AM

That's nonsense, kindness, loyalty an honesty are not sexually attractive traits to women, those traits have minimum requirement(if that) and then the payoff interms of attractiveness has staggeringly diminishing returns. The traits that all women near universally like are going to be the superficial ones like height, facial symmetry, musculature, high social standing, having money etc. These traits dictate options and all the data proves it. And maybe they weren’t talking to a bunch of girls, b…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 08:24 PM

It really is black and white becuase women are not special snowflakes. They all like roughly the same type of guys, becuase they are all human beings that grew up in the same societies with the same morals. For what you are saying to be true all women must have radically different tastes that barely overlap if at all, which is unrealistic for people so similar. Something like 40% to a half of young men have simply given up perusing women, idk why you think that the avg guy is talking to like 2 o…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 05:39 PM
10

Its not just that they also men, becuase "man up" from an effeminate gay is the same as said by a woman. Its that the man also is held to the same standard he is setting for me, and that there is that base level of respect that he believes you can achieve what he has done aswell.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 02:05 AM
1

there are almost no women that dont want a relationship with the majority of men they have sex with.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 01:59 AM
8

very rarely
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 01:26 AM
9

Well first, any time a woman says "man up" its generally good practice to just ignore that for the reasons stated above. Secondly anytime a man is asking you to take on responsibility that he hasn't himself, or that you dont think he would you dont have to take on that responsibility. Then in terms of what challenges you need to meet or what things you ought to do, its those things you think an honourable and impressive man would do tempered with pragmatism, like you dont have to be 100% honoura…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 01:25 AM
13

The type of burden or responsibility is immaterial, the important point is the intention and who is saying the words. Even if a burden is unhealthy or unreasonable, i can at least respect it from a man who has already been doing that thing, becuase ultimately its coming from a place of mutual respect; he is saying "you can achieve what i did so do it". When women say this, its never that, they are always leveraging the fact that masculinity and respect is something that men both need in society …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 10:47 PM
16

and the other is homophobia. "man up" is sexism so it fits right into the trio.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 10:39 PM
61

Mostly only when women say it. This is becuase generally when men say "man up" when they are telling you to take on responsibility that you need to shoulder and is a burden that you know they would or have also taken on. Women however almost exclusively use the term to emasculate men and/or to shame men into doing something they will never have to do. Man up is almost like a light version of f*ggot or Ch*nk.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 10:33 PM
2

Highly dependant. Is this the only option?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 10:27 PM
5

funnily enough i actually agree somewhat with a BP woman, if she isn't attracted to you chances are she is not going to give you her best. Op if you want to know if RP guys only look for or prioritise virgin girls just ask that becuase really all your question comes down to is "would you accept a sub optimal relationship".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 10:26 PM
9

They just want to believe that all RPers are Andrew Tate steryotype, despite the fact that hes a Muslim not RP and even when he was a atheist he rejected the label of redpill.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 10:18 PM
1

You jsut contradicted yourself. You say women dont want a man with options, but then say women dont want a man who had no other option, which would mean he has options lmao. You seem to be thinking there is some middle ground of a man who has options but not this magical "myriad" number, that is too many options, but there isn't. Most women want the same types of things becuase that's how humans are, so its really very bimodal. In most cases men either have no other serious option then the girl …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 08:00 PM
1

women want to feel special. That's becuase they have been told that, its not becuase they naturally feel this. So we have women being picky with respect to this -> smaller pool -> more desperation in men -> pickier women. So it’s always going to be a positive feedback loop. What we need to do is normalize men being alone. Not every guy is going to be paired up and that’s okay! This is a terrible idea, this is how you get increased radicalism and how all the money drains out of your economy and h…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 07:56 PM
-1

They do but a lot of men do not know this, and so they just think they finnaly lucked out and lock down the first half way decent girl, instead of leveraging what they have, becuase they still think of themselves as that 20 something yo kid that women ignore.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 07:47 PM
1

man eaters dont really exist
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 07:27 PM

This is a bad idea becuase then it will allow the government an excuse to collect biological data on every man. The better solution is just to allow the farther to do his dna test in one of the check-ups that couples go to prior to birth or send him some notification to do it prior, and then do the test on the child on the day of birth, or even do it when the child gets their first shots.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 07:25 PM
3

most popular feminist rhetoric is simply just young women justifying being self centred
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 01:46 AM
-6

feminist will argue what ever they think will win them the argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 10:37 PM
1

Well that's what happens when you start believing made up stereotypes without question.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 10:36 PM
1

These are all examples from women's media, and in sex and the city isnt the point that the flaws are a good thing and how those women act is supposed to be empowering.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 04:21 PM
4

do you have any evidence to suggest most pro life people are not Christian? And do you have any evidence that pro choice people are more or equally as likely to adopt?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 02:44 AM
-3

Are you unable to make the logical connection that an implication on Christians is an implication on pro lifers. Or are you truly that bad faith?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 02:40 AM
1

cartoons and tv shows made for a adolescent and under male audience, the adult content you are refering to is not adult content. Its women's TV shows. Adult media marketed toward men doesn't focus on women like that becuase then it would be boring.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 02:33 AM
-1

https://cafo.org/new-barna-research-highlights-christian-adoption-foster-care-among-3-most-notable-vocational-trends/ Practicing Christians (5%) are more than twice as likely to adopt than the general population (2%).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 02:26 AM
2

United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Ireland, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Belgium, Austria, Portugal, Netherlands, Denmark, Finland, Luxembourg, Greece, Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia, Romania, Bulgaria, Croatia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Cyprus, Malta, Iceland, Liechtenstein. Some of these countries even with the mothers consent its still basically impossible to get a paternity test beucae a judge also has to agree which they do not want to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 02:15 AM
0

That's not true at all, pro life people adopt at higher rates then pro choice people.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 02:13 AM
-2

The law . In a lot of western countries you need a judges permission and/or the mothers permission to paternity test a child, with a lot of instances where one or both will refuse becuase the mother doesnt know where the other potential farther is and doesnt want to give up the child support.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 02:12 AM
0

yeah you are just making shit up, you have no idea what the bluepill is whatsoever. Ironically very typically ignorant for a bluepiller.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 02:07 AM
1

extremely common and you dont ignore things. Its just if you are surrounded by women particularly LW women in education as a child they will simply just never address the negative aspects of women while addressing the negative aspects of men. And therefore you will see mens failings as a tendency of men and any womens failings as simply those of the individual women you meet. Also if you look at a lot of boys media the female love interest is typically someone the MC would fall in love with righ…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 02:06 AM
2

You dont even need to avoid shitty women tbh, if you just grow up in a sufficiently left wing space, the adults around you will gaslight you into thinking women are perfect with feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 01:55 AM
-1

That's nonsense, that would make black pill blue pill. Also blue pill characterised by the denial and the refusal to address issues aswell as the romantiscisation. The bluepiller can know women aren't perfect but he will practically always defend the idea of their perfection, and will never accept any meaningful critique that might lead to women changing and giving up some modern privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 01:50 AM
2

and those women are always portrayed as old hags of some kind, there are very few stories where the normal looking woman is evil. But more importantly very few which show the necessary flaws men need to understand. Which is important becuase unlike girls who are constantly told of the evils of men, boys are almost never.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 01:49 AM
-1

This is such a dumb comment. Its a metaphoric not literal, also this part of the matrix is not entertainment, the RP/BP is in of itself a representation of platos cave which is a real philosophical allegory. This is like calling Davinci's The Last Supper "that photo from The Da Vinci Code movie" .
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 01:45 AM
3

So taking a metaphor literally is not autistic but using one is?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 01:42 AM
1

maybe but not toeing the progressive corporate party line will get your company torpedoed by the media which is even worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 08:37 PM
0

Kind of actually I think gaming is special becuase women are terrible at thinking abstractly or understanding things they haven't experienced, so since most have no direct analog they basically just cant accept that gaming is something that is that enjoyable. Also maybe jealousy aswell in that they dont like men enjoying something so much that doesnt involve them or doesnt require people to be right there. Stuff like fishing i think they are more accepting of becuase culturally its seen as more …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 08:06 PM
1

Its becuase of a while ago the no1 consulting company made this bullshit study that said that progressive values bring in more money, and other companies literally just followed suit so now corporate culture is progressive, and therefore any large corp will be unless it wants to associated with the right.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 08:01 PM
0

Becuase its the most popular and its long lasting, you might be entertained by a game for a whole day. And for a woman who's only interesting thing that week is talking to you she's gonna see that as a no go.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 07:56 PM
1

For it to be a woman thing it doesnt need to exclusively only happen to women. Also communication is not the issue, the issue is women dont have hobbies and they are addicted to attention, if they had something to do and they where ok not being constantly validated there would be no problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 07:52 PM
1

Or they will go out with their girl friends every weekend for hours drinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 05:31 PM
2

why would you date a girl that does this lol
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 05:30 PM
2

you dont want her to go with you tho lol, shes gonna want to do completely different stuff and then when you split up she will complain later that ur ignoring her.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 05:29 PM
-1

Exactly the problem isn't the hobby the problem is you have a hobby. Most women have no hobbies and when they get into a relationship they basically want thier BF to fill that whole where a hobby or interest should go. In short most women dont like gaming becuase it means they cant fully monopolise a mans attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 05:26 PM
-1

Nah I think its women not having hobbies. To them people are the more interesting then things in a 2 tiered system where people are always more interesting. So when they get a bf he is the most interesting thing to them, and they assume that the same is for guys, but its not most of us have some form of hoby that will at points be something we want to do more then talk to people even out favourite people. Also I think a lot of guys make the absolutely moronic move of inviting their GF over when …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 05:20 PM
2

Then ur just proving yourself wrong. If most guys are not into metal and they shouldn't get into it to find a gf, then the original rebuttal you are supposed to be supporting which was "women are not that selective, look at the metal scene" is completely false becuase metal girls dont represent women and the scene is not accessible to most men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 05:14 PM
1

Did you? OP said that women only like a really like a small % of men, then the person who brought metal crowds into the convo brought it up as a rebuttal to that, describing how actually women in metal crowds have way lower standards. So if you are saying most guys shouldn't get into metal for this purpose you are confirming OP correct and refuting the original rebuttal. Congrats genius.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 05:07 PM
1

no you can access it in these countries physically but conducting the test will literally get you thrown in jail and none of the results will be admissible in court.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 05:00 PM
1

then what the fuck is the point about talking about metal then lol if its not applicable to the general population of men. Moreover thats terrible advice becuase most men do not enjoy anything that has a sizable female population. Infact most people hobbies are heavily gendered.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 01:56 PM
1

OP was making a moral argument not a legal one, in a lot of European countries you cant even get a dna test for your child to find out if its yours without a judge granting you permission.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 01:54 PM
0

ins't that still a win for the guy? Why would it matter whether or not it is? What implication would that have on men in general inside the metal space or men who might be looking to get inside it to find women?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 06:06 PM
7

But the ratios at these sorts of events is probably going to be like 3 men to every woman if that. Moreover at every music event there are always guys getting lucky, so just becuase the least fat least pale metal head took what was probably his gf home doesnt really mean much.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 05:04 PM
9

When women give advice to men, their goal isn't to help the man find the best relationship for him. There aim is make things easier for other women at the expense of his interests. Or they just give incredibly ignorant advice like "just be confident". This is why men should never ask for advice for women they will rarely actually tell a man how to leverage what he has to get what he wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 02:25 AM
1

Im not saying the accuser should be punished for making an accusation that just goes no where, im saying that the punishment for a false accusation serves the dual purpose. The first of which is punishing those who actually can be proven to have lied which is the accuser is clearly responsible for the harm that has been caused. The second purpose is intimidating those who are thinking about making an accusation they know wont go anywhere, just so they can get a shot at tarnishing a reputation an…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 02:02 AM
0

They aren't if you call 911 for something clearly frivolous that is a crime. Moreover this is not a analogous situation since a 911 call is not necessarily a hard accusation against someone. The accuser having to go through the legal process aswell is not enough of a disincentive. Disincentives need to meet the relative value of what can be gained if the avg bad actor decides to commit the crime. Having to go to court is nothing if you get to ruin the life of someone you dont like. Therefore the…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 01:38 AM
2

Housing, food, luxuries are all things people fight over to attain. Why is a relationship any different? The irony OP is it is actually different as housing, food and a lot of luxuries are heavily regulated by the government. Moreover even things with low gov regulation have high social regulation. There are few markets where there is not some force acting either within or outside of it to maintain its health. The reason is that every market that it totally void of regulation or agreed upon prot…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 01:23 AM
3

I think punishing accusers is always a bad idea, because it's always easier to suggest something didn't happen than prove it did, But then you also give licence to people to make frivolous accusations, moreover the accusation itself causes harm regardless of outcome. Having a punishment for accusers puts cost on the accuser and therefore disincentives bad actors.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 01:16 AM
4

or they actively pursued custody and showed themselves to be the more fit parent. This is a false. Its not that dads get custody when they pursue it, its actually that the only men who have a shot at getting custody are the ones that pursue it. Most law firms will give the client a consultation before they actually decide to take up a case, and in those meetings in 9 out of 10 cases the lawyers will just straight tell the farther that he has no shot at getting his kids and that he would be wasti…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 02:26 PM
4

Women and making things personal lmao. Its not an accurate comparison becuase the avg man is likely not going to assume that a gay mans interest in him is going to translate into women's interest in him. There4 it wont create a mindset of abundance. Moreover the way straight men view sexual attention from gay men is not the same as how straight women view sexual attention from unattractive straight men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:58 PM
13

Lmao you prove my point. Walking and coffee is literally those men showing the woman that he is interested in her, therefore affirming that she is attractive and giving her an abundance mindset.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 11:09 PM
12

Women get both. They get guys who will gawk and also guys who will message them and court them all the time. These things put women in an abundance mindset when it comes to male attention and so they are much less likely to accept abuse. Men get nothing and so men will accept abuse just for female attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 10:38 PM
24

That's absolutely not true. Women might say they dont like attention from men they dont find attractive but they are human beings an affirmation for your physical appearance is always going to make people see themselves as higher value and put them into an abundance mindset.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 10:36 PM
22

A lot of men are simply incredibly desperate. They get 0 attention from women and so are so starved they will take anything aslong as the girl at least crosses attractive/unattractive bar. Moreover a lot of men do not have the sense of self worth to see themselves as worthy of not being abused.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 06:47 PM
56

Its not that, women just get so much more attention from men, so the perceived value of a relationships is just much lower for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 06:45 PM
7

I addressed what you said. You say it makes no sense but both fnf and tate quite obviously believe that women exist in two categories either dating material or sex material. Myron even has a catch phrase for women in the latter as "recreational use only". So there is no disconnect you simply ignore this part of what they say and assume they are tradcons.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 06:43 PM
12

There is only a disconnect becuase you assume redpillers are lying when they say thier intentions. When you grant the barest bones of charity everything is quite simple and explained.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 05:23 PM
7

This leads to usage of dating apps which are designed to milk users, and are also ruthless for men who are not very appealing on their photos, and in general these apps exploit the fact that people are pretty poor at evaluating probability of success. There is a high prize and users(of both genders) naively believe that their chances are real. Its not just that they are designed to milk users, its that they aren't designed for humans. Human heterosexual dating is not symmetrical as the dating st…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 09:51 PM
-1

Its delusional to think that simply changing your perspective will get you think things you want becuase you are already perfect.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 09:44 PM
-2

no its litterally the truth that changing your mindset alone is not self improvement, and that nothing has really improved unless you do things in the real world. Also and this part you missed, the mindset womens self help teaches is just delusional and not productive.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 07:10 PM
-2

No its actually putting in steps to improve your life by forming good habits. Also self improvement mindsets are supposed to be more congruent with reality, yet women's self help mindsets are less congruent and more delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 06:40 PM
1

yes
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 12:58 PM
2

you say "them", but from what i can see the only people saying they dont want kids are blue, purple pill users, who never agreed with the redpill on the "wall" in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 12:58 PM
1

Holding hatred of women, and hating means holding malicious or intense dislike.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 12:25 PM
1

typical millenial woman dodging accountability in owning up to being wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 12:24 PM
3

No you are posing a question, and a question is not refuting a point, Moreover its just in bad taste to ignore an argument and then demand and answer to a question.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 06:55 PM
1

And? That is true for any scientific fact or argument discussed or used in social, political or philosophical discussions. The point of science is to give us facts about the world so that we can talk about those facts outside of a scientific context. If science just stayed in empiricism it would be worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 06:51 PM
-1

None of that is mysoginy. Moreover redpill doesnt say any of that, it states the facts that women trend toward collectivist thinking and are more subject to peer pressure and overall group trends. Andrew Tate Explains What He Meant : "Women are the property of men"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 06:50 PM
1

im not going to answer your question if you dont address what i said first and if you do this again ill stop responding.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 02:27 PM
3

Again you dont understand redpill and are just getting triggered by words without actually reading or understanding what is being said. Red pill makes no demands of women or men, and the recommendation it gives I stated right at the beginning of my comment. Everything I said is true and none of it is hyper online, the only difference between redpill online spaces and irl is that irl people just dont talk about them becuase it implicates that women aren't perfect. And ill say this again redpill i…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 02:25 PM
-4

this isn't a world view its a scientific theory for human dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 01:52 PM
2

it absolutely is true, conservatism is an ideology and thus seeks to change society and reinstate traditional values, it also attributes moral weight to being traditional arguing that the individual must be tradtional for the greater benefit of all. Redpill attributes no moral weight to any decision you make, and is a praxeology, so it just shows a way of looking at society. It also doesnt seek to change it and just gives recommendations as to what is within the interest of an individual man. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 01:50 PM
0

you clearly do not understand redpill. Its not about being unbothered infact the expection is that you will be bothered thats why redpill rage is a term, the recommendation tho is that you accept how society is and how women exist within it. Moreover the issue isnt about women or society not caring its about the lies. If you are going to believe that men being nice to women they dont know is more important then mens QoL I can accept that just come out and admit thats what you are doing. Admit th…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 01:46 PM
0

no its not red pill is a praxeology on dating, its not a world view. Typical blue pill you dont know anything about redpill so you just assume its conservatism.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 01:22 PM
-2

physiognomy is black pill. Redpill also doesnt encourage any of that stuff, it tells men to build value and then gain self confidence from the accomplishments that built your value. Moreover red pill is not a traditional ideology so idk why you are talking about traditional masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 01:21 PM
-1

The thing I don't like about the red pill is how hard it makes the heart Why? How can you put the blame or the ire toward the thing that opens peoples eyes to the uncomfortable truth rather then the forces making the truth so uncomfortable. In general I think most women is you aren't actually against RP, they just dont like guys being mad at them for their privileges and would rather sacrifice a mans QoL if it to make said man nicer to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 01:18 PM
0

becuase that would come with the accountability of accepting they have shallow interests and women will never accept that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 12:04 AM

No this depends if he's not in a state where he can get decent looking women to act properly hes just going to waste his time and money talking to any girl seriously. If he talks to any girl it should be on his terms and be willing to drop girls whenever they become an inconvenience.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 01:52 PM
7

Salsa dancing is very well known for this 😂 But you can try some other activities where there's a healthy gender ratio and with lots of young people. This one is also good becuase you can learn how to dance, which can really boost ur social standing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 05:28 PM
0

nothing if all you have is your attractiveness uve got no hope to find love or any long term commitment from anyone you might actually like. What should happen is before 40 you should learn the other things outside of sex that attract and keep a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 02:37 AM
0

george clooney is not redpill
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 11:09 PM
-1

No becuase part of what she is offering him is sexual exclusivity.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 11:08 PM
0

if he's providing for her which he was he's being loyal, monogamy is not a human trait its something socially enforced. If she out earned him she would hypergamous trade up if she could.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 08:13 PM
30

It doesnt really disprove it. Firstly they got married when he was 53 and she was 36, with them meeting when they where 52 and 35. So its not like he married a woman his own age lol. So when he did his first movie at 22 she was 5. Also looking at the headlines their marriage has basically fallen apart and aparently its becuase he was cheating and prolly fucking some 20 y/o pussy on the side. So redpill vindicated yet again.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 07:09 PM

If a man wasn't taking a girl seriously he would be told to commit or stop talking to her, and if he didn't the dad and brothers would probably come over and fight the guy. So in short the cost would be violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 04:30 PM
-1

Most women don’t get ran through! True but the more attractive the girl the higher likely hood they are. Like a 5/10 and you see no obvious red flags ur probably safe, a 6/10 or 7/10 you should probably just assume they are unless you see strong reasons why they wouldn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 02:55 PM
0

Women do go for bottom 80 but it's only like later in life when they give up on chads who don't wanna settle or think with their brain instead of their heart aka feelings to get the better option. I disagree women definitely go for the 80 while they are young, the dymanic is just not good. You will have do most of the perusing and compromising in the relationship, they will only go for you if you go head first into commitment right away, you will definitely have to pay for everything and she wil…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 02:53 PM
8

Also there where systems in place to ensure monogamy by forcing people to commit or at least having high costs on both the man and woman for not committing, therefore preventing the 80/20
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 02:46 PM
9

The irony that both the right and left in America argue for this. And most europeans have banned both forms of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 09:36 PM
3

Number 4 also applies to society at large. Look at how many women just on this sub have absolutely no care for the maintenance of society or their own cultures if it means some personal sacrifices. If women could somehow reproduce without men, and men disappeared women would still be fucked becuase society would get to like 3 generations, and then it would crumble becuase the young women wouldn't feel any duty to maintain their culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 12:33 AM
-7

It wouldn't becuase as we can see right now when women have autonomy they make choices that are bad for society becuase of ego. So its actually better for them not to have full autonomy and to be restricted socially.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 12:30 AM
4

They end up as heads of a household due to patriarchy and using violence as a means of control. No very few men would ever even threaten to hit their wives, most DV is mutual, and woman initiate most domestic disputes. The truth is violence is apart of reality, and is how ethical principles and norms materialise into society. Therefore men lead becuase men took rights and morality out of the meta physical space, and enforce it in the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 12:29 AM
4

But it’s laughable to paint an entire advocacy group with the same large brush you’re complaining about. The difference is the core values of feminism is anti male.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 05:51 PM
1

true feminist dont want equality they want female supremacy becuase its within the core ideological values to see men as an oppressor.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 05:49 PM
3

No, it's not. Therapy is beneficial to men, telling them it's not discourages them from seeking help, which results in needless suffering and loss of life. This is how you can tell the manosphere does not care about helping men. Seeking help that is ill-equipped to actually help you increases the chances that men will just kill themselves or not seek any help ever. You need to be honest with people not lie. Also you dont care about helping men lol, you literally listened to two men tell you ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:53 AM
3

That's a blatant lie.... It's disgusting. No its true talk therapy was developed for women, women benefit from endlessly expressing themselves becuase they gain much more catharsis from being heard. Whereas in men do not as their mental anguish comes from catastrophising. Talking endlessly doesnt address that problem. Also you dont give a fuck about mens mental health as BP only talks about mens mental health in so far as it can be used as a tool to blame men or try to get men to become more fem…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 11:49 PM
3

And therapy is to blame. You have seen two guys now explain how therapy did not work for them. If therapy is medicine for the mind then if it fails its not the patients fault but the drug. And this mentality that men are to blame is why men dont seek therapy, people like you cant let go of the ridiculous idea that men and women are the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 09:40 PM
1

Because women are more likely to seek mental health services. That doesn't make it worthless for men, and also the manosphere actively fights against normalizing men seeking mental health services. It largely is, the current model was developed for women, and in general the field of spychology is very femininised in terms of its approach. So why isn't the manosphere advocating for men to go into those fields? What are you talking about MRAs have been advocating for more mens mental health profes…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 09:35 PM
7

Because women are more likely to seek mental health services. That doesn't make it worthless for men, and also the manosphere actively fights against normalizing men seeking mental health services. It largely is, the current model was developed for women, and in general the field of spychology is very femininised in terms of its approach. So why isn't the manosphere advocating for men to go into those fields? What are you talking about MRAs have been advocating for more mens mental health profes…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 09:35 PM

More projection. You think the people you hate dont disserve rights and therefore you believe RP must feel the same. You anti RP need to understand that just becuase you hate the true face of women that RP shows does not mean that RPers hate them aswell.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 02:36 PM
-2

I dont think kids should be able to vote that doesnt mean i hate kids. Hatred is malice its not just a stand in for "idea i do not like". RP does not hate women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 10:26 PM
10

All issues of pay are the choice of capitalists who set the wages not the workers that labor for them. There are certain lifestyles (that may or may not be choices) which affect women's pay, but at the end of the day the whole issue exists because workers don't have the agency to manage and set their own compensation for the work they do. So long as enterprises exist at the whims of individual owners and those subordinate to them, your only hope of a consistent and equal pay rate is going to be …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 10:08 PM
0

You ahve to hate women for it to be misogyny RP doesnt hate or denigrate women for what they are, it just points it out so men can benefit from the knowledge.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 09:50 PM
1

There is no disconnect; this is what the red pill talks about daily. Especially on social media sites like Youtube and Twitter and even in this subreddit. There is a disconnect you are BP so you cant imagine someone seeing the world through RP praxeology and accepting that world for what it is. Moreover RP triggers you and so you pick and choose what parts of RP self descriptions you believe to justify ur anger. For example when RP says "women are whores" you shut ur ears off there becuase its h…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 09:27 PM
3

The point is you need to know how society is broken if you want to leverage it to better your standing. The disconnect is you are projecting your own triggered emotions onto RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 04:38 PM
10

Red pill has never been not been about the individual. Whats happened is redpill points out truths in society particularly about women that offend you, so instead of listening further you get triggered and assume redpill is complaining when its not. Redpill is a praxeology the individual can use to leverage his own assets to get a better deal in the dating market aswell as other aspects of life, its not a social movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 04:36 PM
6

This is why Anti RP fails so hard none of you watch or listen to any large RP channels or figures but then you pull these random blogs. Also everything is a grand narrative especially dating, our society is built around the family therefore overarching trends within society are informed by or feed into changing the dating dynamics we have. I swear you guys will say anything but hold women accountable.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 04:32 PM

Firstly bank accounts for regular people is a contemporary thing. Women have always been able to open bank accounts and run businesses. The first printing press in the US was owned by a woman. Secondly I can tell even you know ur wrong, if you had any real argument your first response would be to point to a statistic, but you know by all the metrics progressive ideals have failed. Relationships are simply worse now becuase we ignored truth that men and women are different. There is a reason why …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 07:06 PM

Yes, the glorious past where your wife stayed home raising the kids and definitely not popping valium and getting drunk all day while fucking the milk man and your neighbor Greg. Women and men were miserable in that situation. They just couldn't get divorced. I love how this is the fantasy you have to spin up to justify the absolute failure of modern prog ideals. Modern men and women are sadder, have less relationships with each other and the few they do have are weaker. Traditional values didn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 03:50 PM

based on your logic. If women dont care about a man earning more then them, we should see marriage rates as women earn more not change. But we dont we see as women's earnings increase marriage rates fall.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 03:44 PM

if that where true marriage rates wouldn't be falling aswell as that we wouldn't see marriage rates the strongest in the demos where men out earn women the most, also men breadwinners still make up the majority of marriages. Women are hard wired to care about a man being able to overmatch her providing capabilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 12:09 PM
0

What are you talking about? most men are bombareded with leftist messaging, female teachers, a lot come from single mother households. The overwhelming majority of assholes are nice guys at first. Women make men assholes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 02:31 PM
2

The RP truth is that women should base their attractiveness on what types of guys will give them commitment not who will fuck them an that when they do so a lot will realise they arent as attractive as they think.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 02:49 PM
5

A date and an LTR are poles apart... u know that right? Did I say they where the same? Like if a girl is not into you or willing to sleep with u (assuming she's not very religious) even after 10+ dates, then yes you are entitled to get angry or feel hurt. Same thing in an LTR. A 5 year old relationship where you have moved in, adopted a cat or a dog, gone on trips, have same humour, met each other parents many times over , is still not leading to a marriage? Yes, she has the right to think your …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 02:47 PM
7

Becuase its not the 1940s anymore, feminism happed you got what you wanted, Now just like how taking a girl on a date doesnt necessarily suggest sex, dating and being in a loving relationship does not do the same for marriage. In regards to your overall question, a girl can be great for a GF but not have the required qualities for a wife like being a good home maker, being agreeable enough, caring enough, maybe shes got a low iq etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 02:33 PM
12

an interesting way this manifests is with strippers, male strippers report being inappropriately touched propositioned for sex way more then female strippers becuase the women just dont think that consent is something they need from men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 02:14 AM
2

sally is the motorcycle one, and yeah i agree. All the rest seem annoying as fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 01:23 AM
1

Sally i dont give a fuck about cars tbh but she seems like shes the only one who isnt insufferable
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 01:22 AM
1

no you haven't lmao, also hes not misogynistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 01:19 AM
1

so really you have just seen clips of interviews and probably clipped by leftists and the interviews where also probably his more hostile ones. Try actually listening to the whole videos.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 12:58 AM
2

He's never said you need these things to be happy. His main message to be happy is just to work out, get a good job and improve yourself as a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 01:37 PM
1

Whats rubbish is saying a man should have responsibility to provide, to protect, console and generally perform all the traditional roles a man does while not having any authority. That's literally just a slave.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 01:36 PM
1

To know its a shit sandwich you actually have to see the shit or at least smell it. You have done neither, uve just heard there is shit and made ur mind up.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 01:30 PM
-3

false https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btbuhfLZXn8
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 03:28 PM
-6

No hes explained this like 50x times. He says if the man is going to be responsible for his woman's safety and for providing for her life he should have ultimate authority becuase of this. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Vv4DM0q20uo?feature=share
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 03:27 PM
-2

That is what most of tate says, you only think otherwise becuase you have never watched his shows.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 03:22 PM

they dont becuase if they did they would have taken them. As if you have two girls that you like, one that makes you wait, another that doesnt you will take the one that isn't playing pointless games.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 01:42 AM

Ok I see the issue here. You think that becuase men will leverage commitment to get sex that means that women have to uber hot to get commitment. This is wrong. If a woman is way at the end of a guys league, say hes a 5/10 and shes a 7/10, a lot of guys will commit even if they dont like her that much personally just becuase they dont think they can get sexual access, which is what they really want, any other way. This however does not mean that you have to be that much more attractive then the …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 11:13 PM

the men that dont want to fuck early have no other options.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 11:01 PM

This is entirely cope lol. Most women just have no personality that is why they are passed over and pumped and dumped. This is also why most men marry when they are ready to a "boring" girl, its becuase what reason is there to marry early? Those girls also arent boring, they are wives. They get married to them becuase they do the wifely duties and make the mans life easier. The "exciting" girls get passed over becuase they cost too much in effort, money attention etc in relation to what they off…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 10:59 PM
1

Imagine being tall, successful, handsome. Swipe, ask girl out, drive across the street, have a couple drinks, talk, come back and have sex. Bro its crazy I have a friend whos doing pretty well for himself and hes a tall guy, he tells me all these stories about how these girls at work, often in these serious committed relationships, just throw themselves at him. Its actually wild.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 12:52 AM

Then the latter point is true, you are bringing up incoherent anger defensively becuase you are triggered by men critiquing women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 01:11 PM
7

Men do actually care for each other that's how societies are built lmao, if u only came together during conflict ur never going to have the trust required to actually succeed. You are one of those guys im talking about where you probably never had real friends you can actually talk to and so you seek this sort of thing out from women which is a massive mistake. A nurturing woman is good for nurturing children not for emotionally supporting a man. You need to find real friends that will still hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 10:31 PM
3

Everything you wrote was just nonsense random specific edge cases are meaningless, and do not prove your point whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 08:27 PM
7

No you are just proving OPs point correct, in a conversation about men opening up you are bringing up random edge cases as a cover to obfuscate from women dropping the ball.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 08:24 PM
2

You clearly do becuase in a conversation about men expressing themselves as in how most men in general express themselves you are bringing up threatening behaviour. That is a direct insinuation that a man venting his frustration is threatening. Or you are acting defensive and bringing up irrelevant extreme cases as a way to deflect from womens fault in not being receptive to men. either way OPs point is proven.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 08:21 PM
16

Lmao the bluepill hypocrissy strikes again. How can you say most men are not great at expressing their emotions, but then be in complete denial that most women are not very receptive to them. Open ur eyes society is made up of men and women constantly interacting, its insanely rare that one genders social issues have 0 causal link to the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 08:18 PM
1

You can want someone to share their emotions and feelings AND want to only date adults who have adult level emotional regulation abilities. Lmao the avg young woman has barely any emotional regulation, ffs they cry after a hard day at work
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 08:10 PM
5

Adults are not supposed to "open up" to the point of threatening behaviour. If ur threatened by a man venting his fustrations you are proving OPs point about women not really being able to handle men opening up.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 08:09 PM
19

Exactly men need to open up to men this is why finding actual friends who will have your back through thick and thin is vitally important but sorely neglected by seemingly a lot of guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 08:06 PM
4

Its cope. Women dont want sex robots they just dont want to be seen as salty about getting replaced. Women need men becuase to women the external social aspect of a relationship is something they really crave, also the validation a person brings just cant compare if you know ur talking to a robot.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 11:56 PM
3

I literally can’t even come up with a solution that would WORK, can you?? You cant come up with a solution becuase your BP modality of approaching the problem doesnt work. But the solutions are there. Firstly ban minors from social media entirely. Then put gov money into matchmaking like we do with green energy, particularly into apps find some basic rules for how the apps need to treat male and female users and then tell all general dating apps that if they dont follow those rules there banned.…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 01:02 AM
1

Working” doesn’t mean perfect. In a world where many different people want many different things, regulating things to only produce one result (in this case: trying to get more men married) will end up producing LESS freedom for all the people who don’t want that result (ie all the men and women who don’t want to be married, unless it’s a partner of their own choosing.) But clearly these freedoms are only something that a minority of people are actually enjoying and really wanted. The overwhelmi…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 12:44 AM
1

I personally believe, dating doesn't work. So then why do you guys keep saying that men shouldnt try to adapt to make it work for them, or reject changing social norms back to when it actually did work, hell or even propose new modalities. This is my fustration with BP, you can recognise that there is a problem but whenever ppl argue for solutions you guys clam up becuase god forbid women loose some social freedoms for the greater good.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 12:33 AM

here we go more black pill nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 12:26 AM
2

She could prolly find a guy of higher value but for her she's not gonna find a guy of higher status that will be monogamous especially in that hollywood music and acting industry. Also OP leaves this out but grande has a history of breaking up marriages, so for her its also a bit of a fetish/insecurity thing where she went for this dude specifically becuase he just had a kid and she gets something out of feeling like she can break up strong relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 12:25 AM
1

Yes it is. Just because men are more interested and willing to engage in casual sex does not mean that sex isn’t tied to romance for men. No man is engaging in a romantic relationship with a woman he finds unattractive and with whom he is not interested in sexually Sex for men isnt tied to romance, we can very easily be sexually attracted to a woman we would never date, dont respect, dont like and would never be seen publicly with. Sexual attraction for men is purely sexual it isn't tied to roma…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 12:21 AM
21

Its also not even an exception. OP says Ethan is a lvm but he is an accomplished actor and muscian, the guy has a tony award ffs. Sure hes not ariana grande levels of fame and fortune but he's a very successful considering how finicky that industry is.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 08:39 PM
3

He is not below average lmao. He is a very accomplished actor musician, hes been on multiple successful and large projects like SpongeBob Squarepants, the one they met on wicked and has even won the tony award for best actor in a musical in 2018. He almost certainly has a lot of money and has a lot of status within Hollywood. Sure hes no brad pitt but hes far above "below average".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 08:38 PM
2

No they are not this is why I said the words "romantically attracted" Men are not like women our sexual attraction is not tied to wanting to commit and date a woaman.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 05:34 PM
2

bezos's wife divorced him, trumps first wife also divorced him and the other one cheated on him. Because they know their mistress is worse than their wife or they don’t wanna go through a messy divorce. Men are not women. Men can be attracted to a woman without wanting to commit to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 05:20 PM
2

Because modern women have used thier freedom to become people men are not romantically attracted to, and therefore any man who has sense should not assume any given woman is some exception and commit until prove otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 05:05 PM

Right…. which is why so many RP men and creators use women being more emotional as a crutch, or actively explain how men are more equip to lead at every aspect because they’re stronger and more logical, or how the woman’s role is to support the man and basically be a supporting character in his story. Again thats your value system. you believe leader = better supporter = worse, RP does not make this conclusion you do becuase you believe that only masculine roles are something to be valued. The R…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 04:57 PM

Please show me who made you arbiter of what is and isnt correct lmao. Ur incapable of honesty.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 04:14 PM

its not a specific subset its wildly popular with young men, keep coping tho. Becuase ultimtalely why the younger generation will forever be redpilled is becuase BP white knights like you will always deny thier issues and further prove RP correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 03:55 PM

but the redpill used this to actively explain why men are better than women Red pill does not say this, that is a conclusion you have come to yourself becuase you simply value the aspects that men excel in more then those of women. What red pill does say is that women want men who are better then them. the redpill takes it a step too far by entirely missing the point of stoicism and actively encourages men to distance themselves from their emotions rather than take a more open two sided approach…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 03:53 PM

its not generic self help becuase generic self help doesnt put anywhere near as much emphasis on the value of improvement, nor does it really impart on you the reality of how superficial women are. Also you have no idea what red pill does or does not talk about lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 03:36 PM

From where? Guys here make this claim all the time yet I have never found a woman who has said "yeah I told guys all they have to do is be nice." It sounds like they took advice from either their grandmothers or romcoms. So right away ur just gonna start lying lmao. You are why RP is so popular lmao, you just throw away any good faith you might of had by just saying whatever nonsense you think will help you in the given moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 03:27 PM

like what exactly ?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 03:21 PM

where is the misogyny?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 03:20 PM
1

it’s not a good idea to date a man with potential. He may leave once he moved up in terms of making money and being in good physical shape, his options for women will increase and he knows it. This is entirely female projection becuase this is what women do. Men do not trade up, they might cheat abit but when they are locked in they are locked in.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 03:17 PM
5

Yeah but you dont have to take this as an absolute lol. You an want some things to be actualised and others to still be potential. The point is date someone who has actualised their capacity for the important traits as a partner like to be honourable, principled, masculine etc but still has not realised their potential in the more tertiary traits like finances.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 03:14 PM
3

Its not that he isnt into the girl its that it makes no sense to commit like that to the avg modern woman. Women today have to just take it on the chin and accept that becuase of how they are now they are the ones that have to go out on a limb to get a successful guy who will provide for them and not cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 03:11 PM
0

a college students econ class is going to be thier parents econ class not thier own so you wouldn't look at thier earnings.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 04:35 PM
2

No im not you are doing what OP is talking about you are looking at the stats of all adults all over the US and then extrapolating that to apply to young people when it really doesnt. Moreover its also not anywhere near a high requirement to meet.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 04:34 PM
0

That doesnt refute anything tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 03:58 PM
5

The majority of middle inc and higher are not overweight tho that is the point. The avg american being overweight is becuase lower inc people are overweight at much higher rates and lower inc people have more kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 01:02 PM
1

And saying 68% of american women are obese is false.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 12:29 PM
-4

Its not moving the goal post becuase when ppl talk about avg they really mean something closer to the median, in that as op says they mean someone who is commonly seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 12:24 PM
6

nope its pretty well established that poorer people have significantly higher rates of obesity During 2011–2014, the age-adjusted prevalence of obesity among adults was lower in the highest income group (31.2%) than the other groups (40.8% [>130% to ≤350%] and 39.0% [≤130%]).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 12:18 PM
9

do BP women ever not lie lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 12:10 AM
2

obesity rates in the US are only at 40% for women
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 12:09 AM
1

But its in support of your overall argument that as marriages have become less traditional rates haven't fallen and ur using colledge grad marriages as an argument for that overall conclusion. Therefore its relevant to point out college grad marriages are actually more traditional then non college grad marriages becuase men earn more and are more likely to be able to be male breadwinners.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 07:30 PM
1

That's arguing correlation is causation. The west is successful largely because Europe is just geographically and environmentally advantageous for human societal development and the monogamy brought about by Christianity massively increases efficiency and societal cohesion. This success then begets laxity on gender roles mostly becuase businesses and governments benefit more from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 05:36 PM
2

That's what i though ur entire argument is "i believe this becuase it makes me feel better to believe this". This is why women are a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 05:27 PM
1

According to what? Your fantasies? You are not a man, you dont understand men, so when men tell you what men think stfu and listen lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 03:43 PM
-2

This actually proves your argument wrong. Non college grads means 2 ppl who just have HS level education, those two ppl are probably going to earn a similar amount bc they have the same qualification. College grad can mean an earnings diff of that between a software dev comp sci grad and school teacher sociology grad. We can even see this in the data which shows male grads earn more On top of that becuase college allows men to earn way more it actually allows them to potentially support their fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 03:41 PM
-4

most marriages are still male breadwinner
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 03:24 PM
1

Scapegoating the West for social changes happening literally everywhere the Internet and modern technology generally exist is a bit of a cop-out. I dont think so at all, the western world is amazing at exporting culture. Moreover the export isn't always direct sometimes western cultural norms just exacerbate things that already existed but where not as prominent.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 03:14 PM
10

Becuase of america. People forget the US's no1 export is not weapons or dollars its culture. All the countries listed are massively influenced by western culture, obviously they are not western but you will find mcdonalds, dating apps, youtubers etc. The west is the world hegemon and that means its cultural infections spread far and wide especially with the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 03:09 PM
1

You know people can embarrass and disgust each other right? The fact that you cant accept this proves my point, women's egos cant handle the fact that their beauty isn't some absolutely charming power becuase they invest so much of their personality into it, they also cant handle that they have to choose between exploiting their beauty to do what they want and successful relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 03:02 PM
1

obese no overweight yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 11:30 PM
3

No you dont get it becuase you aren't a man. As a woman your life doesn't change much if people dont respect you aslong as your hot and nice amenable etc you will be mostly ok. If you are a man however it is night and day even outside of your own ego. If ppl dont respect you as a man ppl will literally just antagonise you, take advantage of you, you finances will suffer bc the prof world is massively about connections. Everything in your life gets worse and your woman being a whore can put you t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 11:29 PM
8

That's cope that women tell themselves as a nice lie. Its about disgust, embarrassment and the feeling of being used. Men understand that commitment is something that is valuable becuase your woman reflects on you as a man massively. So when you find out a woman was a whore in the past a lot of men feel a similar way a lot of women feel when some chad sells her a dream of a relationship for a quick fuck. Also a lot of men are romantically turned off intrinsically by promiscuous woman, as in just…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 11:13 PM

The math is wrong on this massively, firstly only 7% of women above 18 are in between 18-25, moreover its clearly counting the same people multiple times becuase they exist in multiple categories like for example 20% of women are obese and 34% are overweight but this is probably counting women who are obese separately instead of counting them as one category as all obese women are overweight. If we do the actual calculations and start with overweight at 34%, that leaves 66% of women not overweig…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 11:07 PM
1

Not really. Just be a man who communicates what you actually want, instead of playing mind games n blaming a woman for not figuring it out You have no reason or right to expect a man to "be a man" when is society does not reward him for doing so. In this scenario since women punish men for being upfront and reward men for playing the game men have no reason to be upfront. Yall don't like when women strictly go out with you for free meals, but mislead you to believe she actually wants or likes yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 10:17 PM
3

Women should just be responsible adults and not play dumb like children.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 10:03 PM
1

No a philosophy in this respect is necessarily a universal argument on what is and what is not moral, a stoic for example says you have a moral duty to live in accordance with nature and that you have a social responsibility to must meet. A utilitarian says you must do things that bring about the most welfare to the most people. RP is not a philosophy like this becuase it doesnt put any moral imperatives on anything, RP doesnt say all men must be RP and it doesnt say its wrong to be BP, Its just…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 09:54 PM
1

TRP misinterprets that to mean showing any kind of emotional vulnerability damages your image, even though literal kings and emperors cried This is nonsense you just made this up.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 09:33 PM
4

its almost like OP doesnt get RP
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 09:30 PM
4

Yes it is. Its one person who has demonstrated they are sexually attracted to another escalating the level of intimacy from a successfully sexually charged event they shared(the date) by asking them to come to the place that they typically have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 09:25 PM
6

Nope, a huge amount of human communication is non verbal or non explicit implications. In fact saying everything you are thinking explicitly all the time is actually how children and people with learning disabilities communicate not adults.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 09:10 PM
10

No it isn't, and if you or anyone else dont understand this or refuses to accept this, then they should not be going on dates with anyone until they can. Its your responsibility as an adult to understand social cues or make it clear to other adults that you dont. Staying silent and ignorant is not acceptable.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 09:00 PM
1

i'm a normal person and won't be having sex immediately The norm is actually that a lot of people have sex on the first date or have had ons. So there's no reason not to expect it if the man thinks the date went well. Moreover its better for women to be as frank and honest as possible as most men are not upfront becuase they think women would feel offended by honesty, so if the woman is honest first it will increase the chances the guy is aswell.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 08:02 PM
0

Maybe she likes him and had fun so she wants to continue the date? That doesn't mean that she wants to fuck him. Then that needs to be made clear and told in a very frank way. As going to someone's house is basically code for "im am down to have sex with you at some point tonight". So either the girl lied by omission by going and not fucking, or she is at fault for not having the basic social understanding. To expand on the latter point, just like how its often mens responsibility to understand …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 07:51 PM
14

One adult inviting another back to their place for drinks is hard sexual advance, if you cannot recognise this as an adult then the fault is on you for even dating to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 07:49 PM
-2

Just becuase the likely conclusion is one you dont like doesnt mean you came to it to be pessimistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 07:47 PM
0

No he just wants an upfront answer, if you aren't interested in fucking just make that clear right away and ask him if he still wants to go on the date.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 07:45 PM
4

But its understandable why a man might be. Women through their actions have created the societal norm that if a man wants to proposition a woman for sex he must ask her on a date and that her accepting and having a good time is her saying yes. If women want less men to feel entitled to sex after a date you must be as open to direct propositions as you would be if a guy took you on a date.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 07:42 PM
4

Exactly the dinner doesnt entitle sex, but it is the way that women collectively have told men via their actions which established that social norm that this how proposition women for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 07:36 PM
9

This is why men just shouldn't listen to women's dating advice lol, u guys only ever speak from personal experience and your personal perspectives, while forgetting that the guy who is reading is not trying to date you or only women like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:50 PM

ur moving the goal post, First you say the 80/20 rule doesnt exist and now you are what accepting that a minority of men do have massively outsized options, but that its ok? Address the point first before jumping around.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:40 PM
3

no specific definition is better, it just needs to be specific so that he person saying it cannot flip flop to a different position when they loose their first one.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 03:43 PM
1

"insecurity" is one of the most weaselly words ever. So many use it as a stand in for "overly insecure" or "extremely insecure" as a bludgeon against men, but then when called out all of a sudden they define it as "having any insecurities whatsoever" or not being inhumanly secure in yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 02:47 PM
1

Red pill trying to comprehend that we as a society stopped doing something because we realised it’s NOT WORKING challenge (impossible). Wdym not working lol they worked amazingly and companies made tons of money implementing these hard lines. Infact they work so well that even tho there has been like a decade and a half of propaganda attempting to destroy these hard lines, people still readily fall into them natrually. You yourself are an example of that, as you like most women take issue with h…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 10:25 PM
1

courses, classes If you approach women in any of these spaces they will say "i didn't come here to be approached by men i came here to learn". travelling here they will say "i came here to see x country not to be approached", or they could easily be from some far off place that you are never going to go to, or be a local in which case you are approaching a woman shopping or whatever. friends of friends This doesnt really work either becuase men and women have different interest, plus friendships…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 10:12 PM
1

I don't know why you keep insisting on using OLD Becuase this is how most people date third spaces where people might have met before are being closed down one after another also women are barely receptive to being approached in any space that isn't explicitly for dating women are largely not receptive to being friends with men and hate when men become their friends to try to date them
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 10:00 PM
1

Basically your profile is shown to a set amount of women per day may you swipe 20 times or a million times it wont change that set amount. Yeah but if ur profile is shown to 100 women a day and only 1 swipes right whereas you are shown 100 profiles and u swipe on 50 how is that not showing that women mostly gravitate toward the top % of men?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 09:54 PM
1

Firstly the 80/20 is not a hard number, its just a catchy stand in for the argument that a minority of men get such outsized amount of options it significantly negatively effects the amount of options the majority of men have. Secondly it doesnt disprove this rule at all. 1 match a day out of what like 40 maybe 50 right swipes, and then that match has like a 10% chance of even saying anything back to you and maybe 1% chance of it ever resulting in her actually showing up to meet you is not dispr…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 09:51 PM
7

Many men went because they had to, and the woman went to do the best they could. Yet only the men get recognized. You're proving my point, not yours. The overwhelming majority of Vietnam soldiers where volunteers not conscripts. So men get recognised becuase men made up 99.6% of the people who volunteered to fight in the war.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 11:59 PM
1

no they know a bear is dangerous they just hate men. Remember this is women we are talking about. Women are never going to be upfront and honest about shit like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 11:52 PM
6

There is nothing wrong with men taking it personally the entire point of the discourse is just to maliciously attack men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 11:52 PM
0

I guess but that is why we use to have hard social lines between men/boy media and women/girl media. These characters where originally never intended for a female audience so it doesnt matter that women get this message, the issue is that we tell girls to watch it in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 11:44 PM
0

if a guy settles for a girl he doesnt have the capacity to cheat, only men who get the women they really want becuase they have high smv can really cheat to any meaningful degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 12:41 AM
1

Men do not lower their standards below what they find attractive, they lower their standards below what they think other ppl will judge them for.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 12:38 AM
2

becuase men and women are different, you might want to see yourself or more personally applicable people in your media but men want to see idealism.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 12:37 AM
0

no the avg man genuinely finds the avg woman attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 12:32 AM
5

As you can see from the link, in nearly half (45%) of American marriages, the husband is not the breadwinner. So in other words male breadwinner marriages out number both equal and female breadwinner marriages.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 09:56 PM
16

but men dont do that, infact married men do the opposite they work more
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 07:28 PM
18

no its going to depend on your luck mostly, looks and charisma.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 12:56 AM

And you would be wrong. Life imperative is to continue life, you cant continue life if an organism dies and makes no offspring. The initial organisms life is only a pre requisite to its procreation, its not the goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 08:26 PM

You are confusing biological imperatives with existential purpose. Whatever your philosophical view may be on existential purpose as a human being does not inherently dictate your psychology; that is determined by biological imperatives.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 07:39 PM

I didnt say it was our ulitmate puprose I said its out biological imperative. And its our biological imperative becuase we are living beings who heterosexually reproduce.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 07:36 PM
-4

I think women dont care becuase they are insecure and so they dont think they have anything meaning full to pass on.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 11:42 PM
5

becuase human beings entire psycology is built around achieving our biological imperative which expresses itself in our conscious mind as finding a woman that will love you. So its incredibly difficult(maybe even impossible for most men) to overcome this foundational need for love. On top of that references to sex and relationships is literally all over society so even out social landscape makes this difficult.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 06:49 PM
1

No you are missing the point. The point is there is no good reason to expand RP or privacy laws in this way becuase these movies are not private. They are selling these movies to any and everyone that has 5 bucks spare, how in the fuck could anyone who bough the movies think "yeah this is private media" or how could the vendor even argue that this is private. To answer your question the good reason is they are selling thier shit to the public. This is how it works you want more public access the…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:40 PM
1

No they dont. You are conflating the two. When you watch pirated media that is a trademark or copy right violation. Revenge porn laws are privacy violation laws, this is why it would make no sense for pornstars to have RP laws applicable to their porn. Their porn is a product sold to the public not private media and so should only be subject to the piracy laws not revenge porn. Carving out nieche for porn becuase women cant handle what "sex work is real work" really means is moronic.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 04:40 PM
1

Unless you where rich they where more romantic becuase each partner valued the other more. Moreover becuase you had to marry to get together, the traits that make someone a good person and therefore partner in the long term where much heavier weighted, meaning better relationship quality. Also currently most relationships right now are mostly just sexual, they aren't serious at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 05:21 PM
5

Your first description is almost a trad con, and the 2nd is caricature of RP. Another example of the problem with BPers, you guys have no idea what RP actually is and instead you just assume that RP is some sort of women hating subsection of conservativism.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 05:03 PM
0

it definitely is for young people at least and in terms of social media it especially is for young women
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 04:58 PM
1

Fore sure in much more ancient history, but the single greatest achievement Christianity had on the west is it socially enforced monogamy to a massive degree. Instead of: the bottom 30% of men having no shot; the next 30-40% having lower quality dating options and the top 20%-30% having the ability to be polygamous, Christianity ensured like 80-90% of men got roughly SMV matched options. Feminism has destroyed this and regressed dating back to pre Christian times.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 03:57 PM
0

Married men are better off than single men; they are healthier, wealthier, and happier. Single women, however, are better off than married women. Married men are happier than married women, and unmarried women are happier than unmarried men. Divorced men and married women have the highest rates of suicide. A major survey of 127,545 American adults found that married men are healthier than men who were never married or whose marriages ended in divorce or widowhood. Men who have marital partners a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 12:57 AM
1

Because it discusses assortive mating which is antithetical to hypergamy. You are missing the point Hypergamy is intention, your studies just show the resultant pair matching which is heavily skeywed by the fact that the sample groups contain a lot of people past 40s.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 12:21 AM
1

maybe maybe not, the point to which people stop trusting the internet and deep fakes really go full "you cant even tell" is not necessarily going to overlap 100%. Remember a lot of gen X'ers are still in the work force and will be for a time, and they will set the professional tone for a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 12:02 AM
1

We could expand revenge porn laws, and make it illegal to distribute pornography unless the people in it (or people depicted in it) have signed a written contract allowing for distribution. That would be completely counterintuitive and oh so typically hypocritical. If sex work is work then the media pornographers create is a product, its not some intimate moment, and its not some heavy moral crime to share it like it would be if the person wasn't a pornstar. Its a commercial product sold to anyo…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 12:00 AM
-2

chaste conservative girls
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 12:55 PM
3

For some people romantic life is just not happening Lmao total black pill argument. Btw if this is true you know this is becuase feminism right?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 12:54 PM
-1

Yeah guys need to move past that red pill rage and just accept what is. Moreover appreciate that the young women today did not choose this, they are products of their environment; and likely most men would be exactly the same given similar circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 12:43 PM
5

That just invites a woman to ask more questions and to not have closure. Lying ends the situation without damaging the woman's fragile ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 07:51 PM
6

men only take collective ownership over building society when women collectively blame men. So actually unlike women men are consistent about socialising ownership.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 06:30 PM
3

Most men just dont want to have parental responsibilities for or get attached to kids they have no parental rights over. Moreover relationships take work and are a process to craft, but when you involve kids all this stuff becomes more complicated. You cant just spontaneously do things bc she has to find child care, you cant just come over whenever bc its really damaging to have adults come in and out of kids lives like that. Its all just harder and its got nothing to do with jealousy that is ou…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 06:28 PM
1

I have no idea why they wouldn't just be honest with themselves and the other person Becuase anytime men state preferences that disqualify women for their choices they call those men insecure and frame the situation as those men "not being able to handle" them. So most men will just lie becuase they dont want to face the social cost of honesty.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 06:21 PM
9

Men where literally never propped up, before the modernernity the avg man was a peasant with little chance of upward mobility or care to exalt him beyond that which benefited the rich and powerful. So the fact that women now can take collective ownership over praise and privatise the faults while the same does not apply in anyway for men is a hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 02:43 AM
1

No that is a new thing, prior to recent history most of Americas population growth was just from Americans having kids. Also historically even tho a lot of immigrated to America a huge amount also left becuase they couldn't make it and that was the context in which that phrase was born. Finally immigration is not a solution becuase A. its temporary as I said before these are developing countries and these ppl send money back all the time, when their countries develop a lot will leave and most wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 11:22 PM
2

nope they will have sex with them and some will even date them, but them doing sex work will allways be a massively unattractive feature.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 09:57 PM
1

This is a lie becuase as you said in your other comment women view prostitutes as being taken advantage of, if women actually viewed sex work as real work then they would see sex work the same as someone who works in sanitary. Moreover a lot of women see leaking of a sex workers nudes as revenge porn, again if SW where seen as work this wouldn't be a deep violation of privacy it would just be run of the mill piracy. Or they would even frown upon a woman having to contractually have sex with a gu…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 09:50 PM
0

The US population is growing becuase of immigration not becuase of births, also its growing from 2nd world countries. Which as they develop immigration will fall. Also btw idk if you know any south Americans or any minorities but they only vote democrat becuase they are poor. Once they get money they vote conservative becuase most are incredibly conservative. You can even see this to a large degree with the last POTUS election as trump gained massively from the Latino vote becuase a lot of them …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 09:40 PM
0

Oh good: another “marriage rates and birth are collapsing!” Despite the growing population numbers globally and in the US. Staggeringly terrible understand on demographics. Other countries population growing doesnt help your country if its population is declining, becuase your country relies on the number of people within it growing not the number of humans on earth increasing.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 05:17 PM
3

Its complete bullshit as a bluepiller you cannot measure success on BP experience of the world. The point of RP is that no one notices RP guys that are actually successful, they just blend into society and impart these principles privately and only discuss RP with other RP men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 05:14 PM
1

The red pill hasn’t gained momentum. It’s chasing the same niche of 18-30 year old dudes who struggle so it can make money off of likes and subscribes and superchats. Its almost like that is the point. You BP guys need to just stop talking about RP if you really dont give enough of a fuck to do the base level of research into it. RP is not some overarching ideology that's trying to warp society. Its a praxeology for young men to enable them to get an advantage in the current dating market. This …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 05:10 PM
6

thats not a shit test. This is what is so cringe about BP, you dont watch any RP content but then expect to have valid criticism of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 05:07 PM
4

This is not red pill this is just general self improvement and actually a good thing to focus on.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 05:04 PM
1

Yeah a lot of so called red pill guys just watch clips of rude or annoying women getting owned on podcasts, they dont actually watch the full shows and understand the arguments being put forth. Namely that you dont talk to blue pill people about red pill, and you definitely dont talk to women about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 05:04 PM
3

in china its super common, i even hear that guys go to brothels with co workers an important clients like western ppl go to bars. This is married and unmarried men btw. Everyone there knows it happens but the women still loose it when they find out
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 05:12 AM
15

Yeah I think women will always hate it becuase it removes collective power from them for demanding things from men and men will always be unattracted to female promiscuity.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 05:10 AM
1

yeah its actually quite rare to have mixed gender groups
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 02:50 PM
3

tiny minority, social media and general onlinification has killed socialisation and atomised society for young people.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 02:08 AM
3

Especially women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 02:07 AM
1

I dont see the point who cares about overall usage, it doesnt do anything for anyone if somone has used the app but doesnt anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 02:05 AM

job positions are voluntary aswell
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 03:26 AM
9

never going to happen becuase women dont hold young women accountable and young women dont listen to men. So young women will do this shit until they grow up and gain a conscience through wisdom.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 05:59 PM
3

standards are way to high bro /s
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 05:57 PM
1

Most of the women are not drunk on the podcast and they dont ply them with drinks, infact when they are really high or drunk they almost all ways get kicked off. Also the avg age has to be like 26 these girls are not like 20 year olds. Finally the after show is vital as it shows the true reality of modern women in person.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 05:52 PM
1

Thats becuase tate only talks to women on camera on other peoples shows, Myron is talking to these women on his show so he has to be the one to maintain order.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 05:48 PM
2

bro they use to do shows 5 days a week for like 2 years, he really doesnt get angry that much, it just seems like that if you only watch 3rd party clips becuase they only show you the times he gets angry without any context or the build up.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 05:47 PM
1

Myron doesnt have any resent men for women lmao, Myron goes in on men who call into the show on their Friday fan calls even harder then he does on women but those clips just dont go viral so you dont see them. Also RP this tone policing of RP is moronic. RP is not some social movement that is trying to change things for greater society. Its a praxeology for individual young men to better understand dating and sexual dynamics with the hopes of improve their lot in current society. It doesnt matte…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 05:42 PM
1

Women believe every successful guy who played them is either a pickup artist or a redpiller. This is why you are wrong OP you forgot the golden rule, never trust women. They dont think he's RP they know they dont know anything about RP, they are just making shit up becuase that's what women do when reality makes them upset, they just lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 05:27 PM
1

no its not becuase porn cant cause you to have no goals or nothing to do, you have nothing first and then you develop a porn compulsion.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 07:49 PM
13

This is a luxury belief. The avg guy young man has a chance with 1 or 2 women every 6 months and only in a long term relationship. He cant afford to be looking for a perfect woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 03:25 PM
2

She didn’t say it was all brutal choking, slapping, and violence. She said “It isn't how people who even slightly like each other have sex.” Most porn sex isn’t loving or affectionate or friendly or warm or caring. It’s not communicative, or playful, or charming, or considerate. A lot of women really really do not want to have to perform the kind of sex shown in so much mainstream porn. Guys talk about not wanting to have to dance like a performing monkey to get sex… well women generally don’t w…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 01:59 PM
7

exactly the problem isn't porn its that your life is shit, you have nothing to do, no goals to achieve, no friends to talk to ,no girls in the roster and so what do you do? Wank all day. Porn isnt some mystical corruption that destroys your brain in most cases, your life is just shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 01:25 PM
1

Redpill is a praxeology not a ideaology, the whole point of it is that RPers dont agree on a lot of things. Moreover porn is a symptom, people who have their lives in order either dont watch a lot of porn or dont watch porn. This is why all actual effective no fap advice is general life improvement advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 01:23 PM

yeah its just like passport bros, women didn't say anything about passport bros until the idea became popular. Porn aswell, when men still where approaching women porn was largely just accepted by women, now that they arent getting thier attention kick as much there all against porn, while ironically being pro sex worker. When sex robots kick off in the near future we will start to see a myriad of women coming out of the wood works just making up shit to justify their insecurity about being repl…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 01:12 PM
2

Its becuase they dont care, thats what BPers think but dont want to admit becuase they know its a non starter.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 09:14 PM
2

That's not true men haven't given up, the government, corporations and women in general have colluded to massively punish any man trying to take any sort of advantage over women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 09:13 PM
5

What are you talking about RP was literally founded on improving social skills, ffs this came before the finical advice, the exercise advice and all these new podcasts lol. You dont know what you are talking about at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 09:03 PM
7

A simple change in posture and expression would make a world of difference, and lifting/frame/and all the other clumsy and stupid red pill prescriptions exacerbate the problem. The cope lol. Just say you dont care its way more believable.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 08:59 PM
1

This sub is about male female relationships lmao not male-male lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 06:20 PM
-1

then you need to have better friends becuase she has about a coin flips chance of leaving you whereas good friends will stay with you for the rest of your life. Moreover you are always risking her loosing respect for you every time you open up.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 06:00 PM
2

you mean when they where conquered and when the arabs specifically put in policies to arabise the nation lmao. Korea did not go through anything like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 05:59 PM
2

Yeah I actually do find it offensive when someone who has the privilege of not needing good social skills, tells someone with a mental disability that impairs their social skills to "just get over it." and massively down plays the amount of work they will have to put in.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 05:55 PM
0

there is bound to be a time in your life where you will be vulnerable That's why you have friends
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 05:51 PM
0

Thats bullshit, everyone has different types of relationships with the people in their lives. This moronic idea that you need to be vulnerable with your woman becuase you are vulnerable with your friends makes no sense. By that logic people should have sex with all their friends aswell becuase they have sex with their partner. Girlfriends and wives are not just a friend+, its wholly different type of relationship that has its own rules and aspects.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 05:50 PM
2

Not quite. The answer is you ask yourself, "do you want to fuck this woman?", if "no" then do what you said, if "yes" never be vulnerable. Tbh its largely pointless as women are mostly incapable of really understanding the male perspective especially when other women are causing you issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 05:45 PM
1

Never said I was against getting approached but it's not really my preference especially since I'm in a relationship lmao. In general, I'm not leaving my home with the intention of meeting a partner. Half of the times I've been approached it was by men I hadn't noticed when I was in the middle of something. It's not disdain it's genuine I don't know you exist we're in a public place you're a stranger you didn't catch my eye. Can you read English or are you just that triggered? Idc about you, and…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 05:43 PM
2

Thats not saying much lol, also sk has only had western influence what 50 years, neo confuscionsim and consfuscionism before that has been apart of the nation for centuries.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 09:43 PM
3

Women existing in public spaces aren't necessarily hoping you approach them or they get approached. This is the disconnect, we're at a bar with friends/grabbing groceries/studying/commuting, we aren't on the prowl for dudes. Every time I've been approached I wasn't hoping to be approached. Every time I've been approached it was by someone I didn't notice upon entering. Idk why y'all don't get this. We don't approach because we aren't constantly on the prowl for a potential fling or partner. Some…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 09:40 PM
0

its not a straw man twitter before was just what you described but for left wingers instead of people who actually had popular opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 05:13 PM
0

Since the Musk takeover, X/Twitter has become a sewer where the voices of grifters and charlatans are disproportionately amplified - it’s completely unanchored from reality. No see heres the thing a lot of you types dont get, what you see on x is not people being overly promoted. What you see on X is normality, this is how popular these ideas and sentiments actually are in real life or at least with general internet users, the reason you dont see this on other sites is simply that they routinely…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 05:10 PM
1

Well society collapses if people dont get married enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 05:05 PM
1

no it is different becuase ultimately its in civilizational sphere that is very different from the west. So while there will be a lot of similarities the hard facts that the western countries came from christindom and sk from neo confuscionism is going to mean the first principles that dictate the way people address issues or meet societal changes will be different. To the degree who knows tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 05:02 PM
1

it is becuase Koreans neo confuscionist structure and terrible work life balance makes upward mobility extremely difficult and so young men being taken out of the work place for almsot 2 years is massive. That's basically what a lot of people spend in an entry level position.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 04:58 PM
1

Yeah but blue pill guys end up getting cheated on, having to accept behaviours they hate from their woman and then eventually left for a RP guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 04:52 PM
1

Yes they are even more hypergamous
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 04:38 PM
3

Stop listening to women they think collectively in a Chad vs woman framing. All of the advice they give will always be for the imagined benefit of and convenience of other women over a potential chad, they will never give you advice that is actually fully in your own interests or even appropriate for you as a normal guy. This is becuase most women's experience of men is dominated by the most confident men and most attractive men, so their framing for understanding what works and doesnt is fucked…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 04:30 PM
9

It’s definitely trickier for ND men because so many people expect men to approach first. This is why so many austic men become raging incel misogynists. Its not just just "trickier" its massively more difficult. This sugar coat things to cover up for the fact that actually women make dating extremely hard for men, becuase doing so will not help him or any woman he approaches. Every ND guy I know that is able to maintain romantic relationships has a story about how they were super awkward but kep…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 04:22 PM
6

You cant becuase two men fighting has a very realistic chance to leave one dead or horribly injured, two women fighting that chance is orders of magnitude lower. Moreover the escalation from a slap to full on brawl is going to be higher with men becuase of testosterone. Therefore these arent adjustable becuase they aren't analogous. Also your data doesnt say what you are arguing. You cant account for 30% of lesbian domestic violence, you leave out that most DV toward bisexual men is from women, …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 05:10 AM
7

yeah but we are talking about lesbians here the chances that they are likely to tolerate being in a relationship with a man to the point it gets to domestic abuse is incredibly small. So without further data its not reasonable to conclude that its even a 50/50 split, id say out of that remaining 30% at least 27% are probably female abusers. Also in that study 78% of bisexual men report only female perpetrators, suggesting women are more prone to violence. Another common assertion is that while l…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 04:30 AM
1

yeah he is. Women overvalue themselves so much that whenever they meet a guy who meets their over inflated standards they basically break all the rules for him becuase there afraid there never gonna find another guy at his calibre.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 03:35 PM
1

I have no idea Idk why its so hard for you to admit that women just aren't confident enough to make the first move.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 08:27 PM
2

Women aren't opting out, if chad comes along hes still getting to fuck. Women are just coping becuase they have priced themselves out of the market.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 08:26 PM
4

enough of the cope this isnt about danger there have been plenty of attractive charismatic serial killers and its not hard to catfish. The reason is hypergamy, women only swipe and talk to the most attractive guy who pays attention to them, then when he doesnt commit they cant take the ego hit of trying someone who looks matches. This then algorithmically deranks avg Andy further feeding into women only seeing chad on her app, and the cycle just goes around and around from there until she gets b…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 08:24 PM
3

Its becuase it is and RP is right.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 08:19 PM
1

id tell the woman to take the guy who would treat her better every time but the issue is she would have to do some personal growth first.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 08:12 PM
4

are relationships exclusively about what you can extract from other people to you? Its not that they think about this exclusively its just that a lot of women are so insecure they prioritise a man that is impressive, and therefore reflects positively on them, over a connection.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 08:11 PM
0

I think there is a much higher amount of women who hate men becuase the idea that men have systemically oppressed women more widely accepted then the idea that lead to men hating women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 07:35 PM
2

Thats the definition of bad faith becuase you dont believe this at all, you cannot use parts of these ideas in a void and not the whole praxeology.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 12:35 AM
1

I don’t think that’s the main problem, some people are just not “dating material”. People dont want to date them. But the reason this happens is largely not becuase the quality of men has massively decreased but that becuase they cant out earn women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 10:36 PM
3

there are, facial symmetry, weight, muscle mass, hair length etc. All these things are measurable and you can find objective numbers for what is optimal. And honestly it shouldn't be that people have to prove this to you but the other way round as humans dont live like hyper solitary genetically distinct beings so the default assumption should be that there is a general consensus even if the particulars of what people like are more unique.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 10:32 PM
1

Attractiveness actually has a lot of objective metrics
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 10:28 PM
1

Its not becuase its reasonable for someone who is average to expect to be able to have a reasonable chance at attracting average partner. Entitlement would be expecting something or being annoyed that you aren't getting something that is unreasonable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 10:27 PM
1

you actually dont most llms find it easier to understand pseudocode then to understand a descriptive paragraphs.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 08:10 PM
6

No they definitely will you are just stuck in todays mindset. Sure guys you know and grew up with might not choose the AI, but think about gen alpha and young genz. There brains are already fried from tiktok, thier irl social spaces will be even fewer then today and they will hit puberty when this stuff is really popping of. They wont have any hang ups about AI, they will just see all the work they have to do to get a real woman and see the ai that requires nothing from them, and they will choos…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 08:07 PM
1

It probably wont do damage to the porn industry, it will just massively devalue female model earnings. I say this becuase the large porn companies actually own a lot of the largest sites where people distribute pirated porn. So if im developing an ai gf, i would probably go to these porn companies and tell them to just straight up give me vc money, invest or buy me out instead of trying to compete. That way you can get a metric shit on of hq videos that you could use to train ur system on, and t…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 07:58 PM
0

it is true becuase hypergamy is real
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 07:34 PM
0

its not always a hard 80/20, but the principle of a minority of men having sex with a majority of women is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 07:29 PM
1

All decisions are based on emotions and feelings because we (as humans) can never know ‘truth’. That's only true if you are a materialist. We can gather information, but all decisions are “our best guess“ based on “how we feel” about the information that was presented to us. What ur describing here is empirical truth not feelings. Feelings are simply "he made me mad therefore he's in the wrong". Empirical truth is "i looked at the evidence and it proves that its more likely he was wrong then not…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 07:27 PM
1

*yawn* Educate yourself. Optimal emotional processing actually enhances our ability to navigate "reality." In a stock investment simulation https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361392/ "In a stock investment simulation" Yeah this doesnt count for shit stocks go up and down for all kinds of unpredictable reasons. So yeah - the actual SCIENTIFIC research is quite clear...our internal emotional experiences are vital to good decision-making in ALL areas of our lives, not just interpersonal.…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 07:24 PM
5

I’m extremely logical but also neurotypical, let’s just say if I told you the truth about myself someone here would say I’m lying on the internet for clout. Thats becuase we are on the internet and no one has anyway to verify what you say is truth, also people lie about themselves all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 07:16 PM
4

You can never know the real number. What you do is first you take an appreciation of the woman: habits, friends, social media etc. Then you assume that the most amount of guys she reasonably should have slept with is her n count.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:41 PM
5

Clarify your idea. Are you saying that the approach doesnt matter ? She may see you getting rejected by another girl seconds ago, it wont change anything ? That's as stupid as it gets so im giving you an opportunity to clarify If you dont know what im saying and ur asking a question dont make an assumption, goddamn u BP guys are so quick to white knight even hypothetical women. The point is about 80% of your success or failure is determined by how you look, so the rest of the shit doesnt really …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:37 PM
4

He didnt waste any of her time, Its a woman job to convince a man she is worth marrying. So if he didn't want to escalate, its on her for not recognising that she needed to prove herself and for not improving.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:32 PM
3

its more then just that they dont value it, its that the social cost to being a delusional and dishonest women is basically nothing and the benefits are really high.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 04:47 PM
5

Those are not genuine and respectful approaches Even "genuine and respectful approaches" do not result in success becuase the amount of creeps approaching women hardens them to instantly and harshly reject any guy approaching they dont like the look of right away. Conversely since they prereject so many guys, theres no point bothering to be "respectful or genuine" since if u pass that inital filtering theres so few guys that the leverage imbalance means your are laughing to the bank.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 04:12 PM
7

Like the 90s maybe but outside of that no. Historically the avg person would get married to someone they had known for years and grown up with or the where betrothed, even most of contemporary history most dating was done via pre established social groups. This is why the olinification of socialising has been so detrimental to romantic relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 04:08 PM
55

large body count not being able to accept that shes wrong having an issue with a prenup having an issue with dna testing for kids
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 04:03 PM
3

Becuase one coherent group is highly unlikely to be characterised by two opposing aspects. So unless you have hard evidence to prove what your saying, you must pick one group as characteristic of fnf fans for ur statement to even begin to make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 04:01 PM
9

They do this this becuase there really isn't much of a hard social benefit for a woman to hold to her word or a social cost to people to seeing her as dishonourable. Therefore when a woman makes a convenient and appeals to her denial being plausible you must reject it and make her prover her own denial is more likely true then not.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 03:53 PM
1

hes not wasting his time, becuase men have times when they want to marry and times when they dont, so if hes in a stage where he doesnt want to marry theres not point leaving the girl whos only GF tier.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 06:09 PM

Not really im pretty sure its quite strongly proven that men have more self confidence on avg, lower neurosis and better self image. Moreover just being an adult human and looking at society we can tell this is the case. Just look at things like the body+ movement, that is entirely a movement created by and for women centred around female insecurity.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 06:05 PM
-1

And just speaking anecdotally, I have very rarely seen a woman with a balanced approach to how they conceive themselves. Either they feel like they are a god-in the flesh or think they are completely worthless. This is really it, its massive ego or insecure and in that choice what person, let alone what man, would pick the massive ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 03:20 PM

Nah its worse with women becuase the avg woman is far more insecure then the avg man.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 01:10 AM
4

That's not true at all women are more likely to use weapons, and more likely to be more violent and do things like punch and kick becuase they are much smaller. Men are more likely to use less force then they are capable of becuase the costs are so much higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 07:16 PM
2

problem is most men would never approach most women at all, thisi s why the up coming robo GF is going to be so impactful. Secondly on the short term side the reality is a lot of girls do not want honesty at all becuase then it forces them to confront that they are actually "that type of girl" so they would rather you do a song and dance.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 02:38 AM
10

Men are more likely to fatally harm children and be the instigators of extreme and genuine abuse. This is not true women make up the majority of child homicide perpetrators
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 01:52 AM
3

Completely right with no.2 most women's tendency for emotional support will feel patronising and empty to the avg man.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 07:19 PM
2

Whats so funny about women is you will be the first to bring up some random anomaly as if it disproves a rule that applies to thousands of people, but then in turn you all internalise any critique of women personally as if you literally all are the same. There is no logic there lol just child like emotionalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 03:06 AM
-4

Who do you think gives men orgasms lol? Do you think most women do anything besides just being a visual aid and a warm pussy to make a guy cum. You need men becuase you are all sexually passive, this is why lesbians have 0 sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 02:37 AM
2

lol you are so tilted i guess we know whos the starfish
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 02:35 AM
-2

Yeah its just responsibility, if women took ownership then they would probably have more orgasms but they want to be passive.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 02:16 AM
3

You clearly dont have sex. go look up missionary or doggy style and tell me how you think the biomechanics work out to enable women to do as much physical labour in those positions.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 02:12 AM
0

What I said is the majority, which is why when women are more active in bed they injure men at massively higher rates due to inexperience.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 02:06 AM
2

Why am I not surprised ur trying to dodge accountability. The number 1 cause of penile injury is from women being active in sex. If women where actually being active in sex in general they wouldn't be so prone to injure the men the are having sex with.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 02:05 AM
-11

Its down to responsiblity and effort. Women put like 10% of the total effort into sex, and place the responsibly of them getting off entirely on the man they are having sex with.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 11:06 PM
1

Well its not going to happen becuase women are notoriously bad when it comes to having that kind of power over a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 03:51 AM
2

initially I think most guys in todays age would for sure. But thank god women show men quickly that that shit doesnt work.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 03:48 AM
-2

she specifically said living as a man was one of her worst experiences
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 01:22 AM
-2

You have got to do a lot of wildly inexcusable shit to make a simple approach sexual harassment. Because most forms of talking to someone without or against their consent would just be called harassment. No you just need to meet the wrong person on the wrong day. Literally any form of communication or contact you have with a person that they interpret as sexual and they didn't like for whatever reason is sexual harassment. For example if a man wore a green shirt to work and for some reason a wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 06:33 PM
1

Its not that they dont need men for their economic needs, thats a feminist psyop, women have never wanted men becuase they need them economically. You can see this becuase when we look at working class and poor women where marriage would mean take home going from 40k to 80k which is a massive change in life quality, they lower rates of marriage then educated women(which might be a change of 80>160 which is a lower QoL increase). The real truth is that women are attracted to a man who can overmat…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 01:35 AM
5

I doubt they will get better. Artificial partners are on the verge of adoption by at least the sub5 men. Once that happens a spiral effect will occur where the benefit of being single will increases > less men approaching women > lower success in approaching > less men approaching women ... and so on until we hit where japan is. Women ofc can change this by approaching or evolving their expectations of men and themselves within a relationship. But these things will never happen as women will alw…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 11:50 PM
1

That's becuase a LM girl is going to be able to attract higher value men then she would otherwise. But if said LM girl went for a guy equivalent to herself she's probably not going to get cheated on becuase i wont be worth it for the guy. So the choices she makes are the reason she gets cheated on not being LM.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 11:25 PM
0

The woman logic of "words that might upset someone" = hate doesnt apply here, im a man talking about other men. So unless what i say is explicitly attacking somone its not hate. What I said is just a fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 07:40 PM
2

That's because women project what they do onto men. Men are not going to cheat on a woman just for being LM, if anything it will reduce her chances of being cheated on. Whereas women will cheat on a LM guy becuase unlike men women need to look up to their partner to a high degree, and no one respects anyone that much that lets them walk all over them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 07:37 PM
-2

Im not implying anything im saying that a low maintenance woman is going to receive more hate. This is becuase women engage in collective bargaining where they perpetuate certain lies or do certain behaviours to present all women as being of a certain standard that enables them to be the worst possible partner while still being attractive. So the LM woman will get hate becuase she's crossing the picket line so to speak by sacrificing being stuck up which is something other women feel they can ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 09:55 PM
5

its the low maintence GF becuase women hate seeing other women undercut them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 05:57 PM

Lmao half the terrorists who successfully committed attacks in western countries where on watch lists. Also look at haiti right now gangs have taken over the country, in africa a bunch of the francaphone countries have couped their governments away. I think the only reason we dont see mass unrest right now in the western world is videogames, porn and high oestrogen in the water supply becuase of birth control. Infact id argue the reason the british government was so deeply concerned about people…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 08:18 PM

*were *It's *were It is "in this thread" rather than "in this thread," as ITT indicates. Furthermore, contractions such as "it's" or "ITT" are inappropriate for official writing. You should also include a preamble stating that you are correcting spelling errors, followed by a colon, and bullet points. Finally, "Hmm" is inappropriate for official writing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 07:14 PM

Thats becuase a lot of women aren't mature enough to accept that they squandered the freedoms they where given. Its like how if you let a 7 year old decide what they eat for their meals becuase they where being too fussy, do you really think after eating nothing but ice-cream for 2 week there going to own up to all the issues they are having with that kind of diet. Also a lot of women have bought into the feminist psyop that women where unwilling slaves with 0 benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 06:37 PM

its not a threat its a statement of fact. Women just are not capable of enforcing their will with mass violence to the extend needed to get thier way in society when everyone else disagrees with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 06:29 PM
0

Women's happiness is irrelevant, things only change when enough men dont like something or when the rich and powerful dont like something. The victories of feminism where only possible becuase the government and corporations wanted more tax money and more efficiency for the same amount of money. The hard pill for you to swallow is that If there was no money in getting women to work, women would still be in the home because as the end of the day women dont have the fortitude to really go out thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 03:27 PM
2

It was better, most guys never had any shot at attracting the avg woman off purely upfront displays alone, like what you get on dating apps, he always relied on the social proof of being known as a respectable guy within the social circles he shared with the women he courted. Also becuase social circles where larger women's hypergamy was necessarily kept in check by each other becuase women would give untold amounts of shit to other women that are on chads roster out of jealousy. Whereas now gir…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 03:23 PM
0

That would be like saying if men all became blind and then stopped liking women as much it means men dont like women. This is not true. The tangible aspects of humans are just as much apart of them as the tangible ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 07:58 PM
1

Its not that women dont like men that much, its that finances was a massive part of their attraction. And most men do not have enough money to over match the avg woman's salary. This is also why degree holders have higher rates of marriage, its becuase despite women going to university more men still make up the majority of students in high earning degree courses, and therefore they can still earn enough to over match their female counter parts.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 07:32 PM
0

Id offer commitment, which would be special becuase most guys she either doesnt want or they wont commit.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 08:57 PM
2

Thats not cheating as chad has never told any of the girls that he is monogamous to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 04:36 PM
2

actually i think in most cases its not. In most cases its one guy having multiple situationships, where the girls all girls dont fuck or entertain other men becuase a. chad is superior to whatever else they can find and b. they think they will eventually end up in a committed relationship with chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 04:30 PM
1

many women are in them without knowing
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 03:04 PM
0

no the womaniser knows what his time is worth, and so he just will never approach a type of woman like that and she will be blissfully unaware.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 04:47 AM

its most women and ironically those women the most afraid of men are the most likely to be in support of firearms restrictions.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 11:46 PM
0

why only pepper spray? ? If a guy is on drugs that wont stop him. Why not just buy a gun?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 07:34 PM
1

False dichotomy, the overwhelming majority of guns used in crime are obtained illegally. So its actually just a scenario where only he has a gun and where both of you have a gun. But even if I where to humour you. In that first instance if he wants to rape you, you can do nothing becuase even unarmed you have no chance of winning. Whereas in the 2nd instance you actually have a chance becuase all though he has a gun he's not bullet proof, so if you can shoot him first you can save yourself. Also…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 03:24 PM
-3

This mentality is ridiculous becuase that's true of literally any criminal. You aren't ever going to be able to predict who will be a criminal at first glance, the point was you are supposed to be able to defend when the criminal does identify themselves aswell as minimising your exposure to potential threats. But women time and time again vote for policy that makes society more dangerous and vote away citizens ability to defend themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 02:19 PM
0

irrational fear
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 02:13 PM
3

no it isnt becuase then you literally have to just accept the first attractive woman that fits that niece that passes your way becuase chances are you will not find another one.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 02:03 PM
1

this is just a loosing strategy authenticity matters so much less then appeal, moreover who you are is not just who you become becuase of your default tendencies. Humans can and do authentically change and grow, so improvement does not mean in authenticity.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 02:01 PM
0

she doesnt know what she is talking abotu at all, she has admitted that she has no evidence for her position and she just believes this shit becuase she wants to.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 10:33 PM
0

Myron is a failed personal trainer that figured out how to sell Redpill instead. And he’s done as well as actually helping dudes get laid as he has get fit. But enough men pay in for him to hire tires trap women to yell at because they can live vicariously thru him. He knows it the women know it. They make money and the crowd gets worked up like a pro wrestling arena And that’s all it is. Again you are just making shit up, past this comment im just going to call you out for lying instead of expl…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:22 PM
0

no as in they will never say anything redpill, they will sell you the dream and give you all the bp talking points to fuck and then dip Its only the morons that arent really listening and that you would never be interested in regardless who will actually let you know they are rp. the true RP man who isnt a content creator is a mostly just a gray man
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:15 PM
1

Address the fact that you have no idea what you are talking about and stop trying to dodge.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:12 PM
2

Bruh, people are literally doing podcast for free or without any monetary gains all the time. because they just want to talk about something they care about And? If you didnt pay doctors some of them would do it for free but most wouldnt. Also those people that are doing it for free either A. are some kid whos having the bank of mom and dad bank roll them or B. they are doing it really sporadically and not invested. The fnf studio is built in the main hosts house, its not a podcasting studio tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:01 PM
1

becuase he hates them. There is so much animosity between them, that the producer crashed one of their shows to fight myron(the main host), and myron pulled out his gun and told the guy if he stepped foot inside he would kill him. Anything said by a former employee that disgruntled is invalid. So im proven right for sure false.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 07:53 PM
-1

Why would they be transparent about hiring women? Im not saying they would be, but they have had like 5k something women on the show over 3 years, if they where paying them we should be seeing a couple hundred examples of women having concrete proof they where hired to come on. But we dont we see the odd salty woman make quickly debunked claims. The reality is most of these women are just normal women that want to come on the show, becuase most women love attention and they love talking about da…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 07:47 PM
2

Find one “pill-caster” willing to do it for free. That's a false dichotomy most people wouldn't do most things they actually want to do if they weren't getting paid because its simply a fact of reality for most humans that you need to take care of yourself financially. Myron cried (like an alpha!) when YouTube demonetized his channel This is why BP critique of RP is so worthless, you are all "RP is sexist and wrong" until you can use those same arguments and principles against an RPer, and there…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 07:40 PM
3

No, most women or at least enough women will accept anything from a guy if hes attractive, and infact most women will conform to their mans ideology if they have actual desire for him. But regardless the point of the podcast is not to improve the dating success of the podcasters, its for the viewers benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 07:35 PM
1

Well FNFs old producers admitted they paid girls. Yeah this is for sure false
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 07:32 PM
0

This is wrong. Women go on their shows bc RP content is massively popular with men regardless of whether they are a fan of that RP content creator or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 07:30 PM
-1

that is extreme cope lmao, if they where paid there would be tons of stories coming out from girls who had been paid or some evidence of a casting agency. Instead all there is the odd salty woman who makes an accusation but has nothing concrete to actually back it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 07:27 PM
1

not at all bc a guy who is actually following RP will just never tell you or more likely be able to tell what you are before you met and never even deal with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 07:24 PM
1

no it heavily depends who you are talking about like most things.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 07:18 PM
-2

The podcasts are there to highlight female nature, you just dont like it because they pull the curtain back an show modern women for what they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 07:17 PM
1

it depends, whatever podcast for sure is a grifter as they seem to overly highlight OF girls becuase thier podcast is purely clip farming. Fnf and pearl do not.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 07:15 PM
0

They are about education not attraction
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 07:14 PM
-3

its not insane its just explaining why the naturalistic fallacy is wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 06:29 PM
-9

yep and only like 3% of women are marriageable quality
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 07:24 PM
1

Men should only do more chores if women are willing to get rid of the random crap they fill houses with.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 02:49 AM
1

How hard is it to pick up after yourself? As hard as it is to ignore small amounts of mess.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 02:43 AM
0

Which is why women need to negotiate for this stuff, but they wont becuase that will probably result in concessions
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 02:43 AM
1

To create a substantial nest egg you must siphon off a decent amount per month and so that is necessarily going to unduly burden your partner finacially. Moreover where a prenup is just as much about setting the terms of how the marriage will exist as it is insurance for its failure, hiding money is exclusively just planning for a divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 11:06 PM
2

ofc it is
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 11:00 PM
2

hiding money is worse lmao you are literally lying to your spouse and putting extra financial burden on them, whereas the other option is the person being up front and honest about wanting to have some security.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 10:58 PM
1

having serpeate savings is not the same as having a secret bank account.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 10:56 PM
1

Becuase of overt homophobia from straight men, which is pretty sad tbh as getting to know a few as an adult has shown me that even tho a lot are kind of feminine in mannerisms, they often have pretty typically masculine interests. It must suck growing up and being into video games but your close friends only care about makeup. Also I say "overtly" for a reason as most of these women they make friends with are just covertly homophobic where they will just not see the guy as their cookie pet gay i…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 03:57 PM
1

if its a monogamous relationship sure but im sure it would be much easier for them to have long term open relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 05:15 PM
3

gay guys get sex the easiest for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 05:33 PM
1

casual sex is easiest to get if you are a gay guy and committed relationships are easiest for gay women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 05:32 PM
1

I’ve had this happen before….it sucks….its hard admitting to our own selves how shallow we are. Its not shallow we are human beings not some type of robot. We are intrinsically both higher intellectual and base biological beings. Therefore human love must necessarily be both an intellectual and a biological. Denigrating the sexual attraction side of love is denigrating half of what love is.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 02:29 AM
1

not really becuase all the boomer moms worked part time and could quit any time childcare got too much
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 12:09 AM
4

I think many men just put so much emphasis on their job (even if it's just a mediocre job) that they don't want to do anything outside of that. Firstly to this day male breadwinner marriages out number equal and female breadwinner ones combined with the median breakdown of earnings in these marriages being $96k for the husband and $30k for the wife. So its actually entirely reasonable for most men to be unwilling to do more then 1/4 of the house work when there wives are earning 1/4 of the famil…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 12:05 AM
1

Its not becuase you actually get all the tangible benefits of a friendship if someone was being your friend to have sex so there is an equal exchange. When it comes to the dinner the guy gives everything the girl wants, the woman gives nothing the guy wants. Moreover most women find it rude and creepy for a man to directly proposition them for sex, whereas most men actually expect or at least want a woman to be honest with them if they are not interested.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 02:22 PM
1

You are becuase the original argument you are defending is that its ok for women to lie by omission by going on dates with men they have no romantic feelings toward but pretend they do for a free dinner. Therefore your non sequitur point discussing explanations is a pivot to a topic you think you can better defend. So ill state the point again, it is not ok to lie by omission. If a woman has no romantic feelings for a guy and he askes her out on a date its her moral responsibility to be honest a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 10:55 PM
1

Stop trying to pivot, its absolutely wrong to lie by omission.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 03:30 PM
1

she didnt want the friendship she wanted the attention and free dinners, which she got.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 01:39 AM
1

this is a straw man, my argument was about likelihood to marry not likelihood to have a successful marriage. And the stats show women are the least likely to want to get married to the men they actually economically need more. Moreover its pretty well established that when asked most women find a mans earning highly important. So again its simply a fact women are naturally all gold diggers and we are just seeing what happens when they no longer need to dig.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 02:29 AM
-1

ill do you one better in 1639 the first printing press in the US was owned by a woman https://www.frederickbookarts.org/post/history-of-us-women-in-printing#:\~:text=Elizabeth%20Glover%20was%20the%20first,the%20first%20in%20the%20colonies. Women could allways own thier own stuff, feminism has psyoped a whole generation into thinking it gave women the right to hold capital.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 09:18 PM
-2

This is not true its not that men aren't use to it, its women who are not use to it. If it where men who arent use to it we would see higher rates of marriages and relationships in income brackets where women still need men aka working class people since working class women still need men(and vice versa) to support a family or to upgrade thier tax bracket. However we dont, we see higher rates of successful marriage where both partners earn enough on their own(so the woman doesnt need the man) bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 09:11 PM
-3

That's not true women where always able to control their own capital they, they just did not when they got married becuase the husband took over responsibility for all her debts.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 08:54 PM
1

its not worth it and if it where more guys would do it. As an avg guy being a traditionally masculine man will get you taken adv of, falsely accused, probably divorced and labelled a misogynist.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 02:01 AM
1

yeah i know which is why most guys do not try to be a man at all they just slump to living a life of neoteny. But again they do this becuase being a man while being avg is just not worth it now.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 11:08 PM
-2

I think the person only knows lefty male feminist men, not the avg man.,
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 03:22 PM
2

no they simply dont have the options to be picky its not that they assume she will change, its women that date men and assume they can change them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 03:20 PM
-2

Well thats never going to happen becuase women punish honesty for 90% of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 03:18 PM
-1

Ofc but thats becuase we have made it difficult and removed most of the benefits from being just an avg man. Now its really only worth being a man if you can be a great man, and even that is arguable.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 03:16 PM
2

I think it will be the opposite tbh. If andy can get sex from the robot that means he will likely only pay attention to women who actually put in the effort to approach and impress him. So I see a world in which the men who are married are married to women who are actively trying to compete with the sex doll.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 05:41 AM
2

but you are only talking about the benefits, so yeah all those things are nice, but if you contrast it with the amount of work a lot of guys have to do to get a pretty avg woman; now the sex doll makes much more sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 05:38 AM
1

the point wont be to make men happier it will be to give men the ability to be more discerning with women since women wont hold a monopoly on sexual access
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 05:36 AM
1

RP is not conservatism, progressivism Christianity islam etc its not an ideaology that seeks to change society or your life its a praxeology that has the purposes of allowing individual men to improve thier own standards. So its not that anyone is afraid of criticism, its incredibly easy to find out what rp is, its just that critique without suggested improvement isnt valid.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 05:25 AM
1

Its not a level its a relative distance. and it changes how high you are and how low she is. Like id say a guy who's a 7 can fuck a 5 immediately, but I dont think a 10 can fuck 8 immediately. But id say a relative distance of 2-3 overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 04:51 AM
1

Its hypergamy and the economy. A fundamental part of female attraction is a mans ability to over match her ability to provide for herself and family. 20-30 years ago men could out earn women and so that was a massive attractive feature for men, also we had social stigma for being a slut so when chad came to whipser in beckys ear, 1. her dad prevented him most of the time, but 2. she knew he was chatting shit becuase she knew he would marry stacy. Now we dont have the social pressure on attractiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 04:48 AM
-4

even if you dont want to fuck the girls date a bunch of different girls and get to the point where they would fuck you, becuase as a man you need to gain experience with women or you will end up like crowder marrying a girl who checks all the boxes and then ends up no fault divorcing you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 04:35 AM

But then advice should be to encourage them not be be weeded out not to tell those men things that will essentially ensure they never find romantic success or only find success with the worst options they can stand. So it is injustice becuase when giving advice to men women almost always give them advice that is detrimental to their own interest to benefit women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 04:32 AM
3

Women's advice to men almost universally tells men to approach the lowest hanging fruit and offer her the best deal in an effort to ensure that any given woman gets the best option at the expense of the mans interest entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 04:29 AM
0

what do you think no fault divorce is
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 05:01 AM
-7

Here is a list of the top reasons for divorce. its not an accurate list becuase it doesnt include no reason which is the most common, and is likely just a mask for the guy was too feminine in some way.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 04:47 PM
1

That's becuase women's standards have increased with thier income aswell as it simply being harder to increase ones income. Most men will not this is what you dont get as a man if ur not born attractive and charismatic you get nothing until you improve. And so if robo gf is more cost effective men will simply stop going through the whole process.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 07:14 PM
1

OK and? The question is can dating apps be fixed not is any given fix likely to work. Talking about likely hood is a nonstarter becuase obviously these apps are incentivised not to fix the problem so there would be no discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 06:38 PM
1

they actually dont. Most women end up with men who richer then them, have more options romantically then them or they choose not to date.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 06:32 PM
1

thats like asking why would a child not want to eat icecream every day. The objective is to improve dating apps for their intended purpose which is to create successful fulfilling relationships, not to give into immediate desires. Moreover 50% of marriages fail and 60% of young women today will never be married primarily becuase dating has moved so much onto these apps. So they are not fulfilling their intended purpose at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 06:17 PM
1

its not about women wanting to use this its about creating the best outcomes and traditional apps do not, they feed into womens hypergamy and funnel them into unsatisfying relationships where they are 3 of 8 on chads roster(knowingly or unknowingly).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 05:36 PM
0

How does this improve the dating app experience for women? They would be better off using existing apps. That would result in a terribly skewed gender imbalance that would make the app miserable for men. It restricts their hypergamous tendencies of endlessly trading up or believing they have 5m options, which then lead to more satisfying relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 05:34 PM
2

Things like pensions wont work for younger people since they depend on working people paying in more then what older people take out. Way less tax money and actually more costs overall. Yes kids cost in tax money but only for 2 decades and decrease in cost over time, old people might start really needing government assistance at like 60 or 70 and not only will that need go on for 30-40 years, but it will also increase over time in cost to the tax payer. Moreover when the kid grows up they will b…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 05:32 PM
3

well that doesnt mean its impossible it just means the dating apps have no incentive to fix them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 05:09 PM
1

This is entirely cope. What do you think settling is lady? Its realising what you initially wanted cost too much investment and/or is too unlikely to occur for the return benefit it brings; therefore you choose to take your romantic options that aren't as beneficial but cost way less. Aka you are doing a cost benefit analysis and taking the option that is more cost effective. This is what young men will do with AI, they will see the benefit real women give is just too megure for the massive amou…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 05:01 PM
2

No its the opposite, it will be most. And it will be most becuase on a cost benefit ratio it will simply make more sense to use the AI. Men and women are the least attractive we have ever been to each other ever, which means the avg young man will has to put in a gargantuan effort into improving himself with 0 initial return for a long time before he sees any success with women. This in normal times isnt so bad becuase men have no optiosn but to improve so they will, however if these young men h…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 04:03 AM
1

google glass was completely different. Dont believe the ads google put out, I used it and it could only display monochrome whiteish text no images unless they where like ascii art Apple vision is full image display so its truly something different. Moreover google glass came out before dating apps and the heavy internetification of most of young people social lifes. Finally the trends we see in korea and japan are likely what will come to the west since the issues in thier soceity are caused by …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 07:40 PM
1

The whole reason AI gfs are coming is becuase thats not going to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 07:35 PM

Also most churches totally wouldn't mind if you where just upfront and admitted that you where an atheist but wanted to join becuase you like the culture as they would see you as a potential person to convert to their faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 05:54 PM

becuase unless you go amish or join some sort of secluded cult you arent getting bang for your buck if women is all you care about as at the end of the day these conservative women are still in a non conservative greater society and so at any point if they want to they can dip into the priviledges of modern women. Just look at steven crowder for example the guy was the total conservative provider guy who found a conservative woman and she left him via no fault divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 05:49 PM

were not going to know how it affects things really and truly for another 5-10 years as most of the bulk of the viewers are newer RP guys who are in there late teens early 20s
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 04:20 AM
-5

Everything becuase the dinner is not what the man wanted that was the payment for what he really wants, whereas the nice guy gives the girl everything she wants out a friendship and then asks after at some point to escalate.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 04:16 AM
3

no
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 08:55 PM
0

but you have also never ben a man so how would you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 08:54 PM
2

This. Especially for women, who are more attracted to narratives rather than the actual man. This is true but its not worth acting like it is. In this day and age the amount women will require you to do in order to successfully woo her over to liking you is simply not worth the effort. Moreover you cannot get women without self value and in most cases the mindset to where this amount of effort makes sense is one where you dont value yourself or your time.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 08:52 PM
1

It "enforced monogamy" by making women artificially dependent on men to, you know, not become homeless and die. Naturalistic fallacy. Just becuase something is not natural does not mean its bad. Socially enforced monogamy is probably the greatest thing to benefit humanity. Moreover its not even mostly artificial, it was simply a fact of reality that women had to be reliant on men becuase they cannot defend their own resources or maintain their own liberties. Once we eliminated--or significantly …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 08:47 PM
2

You made the claim most avg people are together, which directly means 51% of both men and women must be in monogamous relationships. So i disproved that with the fact that most men are either having casual sex or sexless.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 08:25 PM
2

No you are trying to pivot your argument into someithing that bluepill is not becuase you realise that the bluepill postion is not defensible. Bluepill oestibly argues that an avg guy putting in an avg amount of work to himself can find another avg woman(looksmatching) as long as hes a good guy and is authentic to himself. Now you are trying to morph the position into saying that avg man should accept only weird looking women. becuase you know the avg guy cant actually attain the avg woman anymo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 08:20 PM
3

No by definition they are average becuase they are the norm. Infact in terms of the things women a say they want like emotional intelligence, openness, communication etc they ought to be more attractive to women. But the reason why you dont think avg men are averagely attractive is becuase of things women are actually attracted to like money. Most marriages are male breadwinner marriages, so when the avg man cannot be a breadwinner or earn significantly more then his female counter part women st…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 10:15 PM
3

This is so dishonest your original claim was that an avg man should not expect to find a woman he finds attractive not that an avg man should make do with a woman that isn't "conventionally attractive". Moreover even this is an admission that BP lied becuase the inference was always that you would get conventionally attractive women, as why should a conventionally but averagely attractive man only be able to date unconventional women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 10:08 PM
3

No they aren't most young people are sexless or engaging in casual sex with multiple partners. The amount that are in relationships is comparatively the minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 09:50 PM
3

most people alive today dated and married in a social environment very different to our own
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 09:47 PM
8

No it doesnt, the impression is allways that being yourself will get you a woman you find attractive. So if you are saying actually BP isnt that, then that is by definition a lie becuase no man would subscribe to this idea if it would result in a woman who he found unattractive. Moreover that cannot be a success becuase sexual attraction is an necessary part of male romantic love, so any relationship whereby that isn't present is doomed in most cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 08:24 PM
7

You guys are the first to say that looks and money are massive determining factors in all other aspects of your life like career success, health, emotional wellbeing etc. But the moment it comes to dating you magically turn into a 90s republican and say "pull yourselves up by your bootstraps, society is ok its your fault you dont have success in dating". Money 100% will determine your success romantically, and the fact that the avg guy cant maintain that 10% earnings gap over the avg woman( whic…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 08:20 PM
9

Red pill claims women share high value men. They don't actually show anything to back that up. 60% of young men are single but only 30% of young women, so women are being shared https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/3868557-most-young-men-are-single-most-young-women-are-not/
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 08:09 PM
31

If you accept that an avg guy cant get an avg girl, then how did BP not lie. The entire argument from BP is that an avg guy can just be himself and find success in dating, attracting only women you consider less attractive then you is not success.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 08:06 PM
2

Exception fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 07:46 PM
11

In mainstream society chad can fuck tons of girls and avg andy gets cheated on, passed over and ignored.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 05:29 AM
1

becuase society enforced monogamy which it does not anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 04:44 AM
-3

They have not become misogynistic becuase the way redpill speaks about women is not spoken with hate, its just that you cant accept the ugly truth of what women are without hating them for it so you assume that red pill must aswell.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 04:43 AM
0

Redpill BELIEVES its fighting feminism but it’s literally the tails on the same coin. They behave exactly the same way. They do exactly the same things they say they hate feminists doing. Redpill does not believe its fighting feminism whatsoever. Redpill is about teaching men how to adapt to the world that feminism has created. You just dont like it becuase you dont like to see men beat women at the game that feminism created.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 04:40 AM
4

if it works then it does
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 04:35 AM
3

No its different becuase if had someone else dress you and do your hair and makeup you would still derive the same feeling, whereas if a guy just woke up and was shredded with no work then he wouldn't get anywhere near the same amount of value from seeing his progress.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 04:02 AM
2

Nah im around a 6.5-7.5 depending on how much effort i put in, the thing is I dont really care about my aesthetics outside of how it enables me to get what I want.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 03:57 AM
5

that's different the aim of a gym selfie is to see progress toward an aesthetic aim or improved functionality.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 06:40 PM
4

yes but only in the context that it will allow me to have sex with women and/or improve how people view me professionally and socially. I have never and will never improve my appearance simply for the sake of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 06:37 PM
0

The problem with porn and OF is that it portrays this mind blowing sex with people who have perfect bodies... OF is an amateur porn site where most users are not making highly produced content and amature porn is one of the largest on most sites. One of the biggest draws of OF is the girl next door vibe its pornstars have where they look like women you might actually meet in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 03:19 AM
-4

He would sit at the dinner table with his wife and kid, then put headphones on and watch porn while he ate. wow thats wild ​ I think generally, girls probably wouldn't want their partners watching porn if they could create the perfect partner. True but in that same respect those women need to in turn make some of the sex they have with their partners easier to as a replacement.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 03:14 AM

It doesnt work becuase women aren't playing for short term hook ups they want long term commitment, and once you get to know someone its not hard to tell their smv.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 01:49 AM

No if hes high value and can get another woman of the same calibre hes going to know that a woman making you feel insecure or like you want to be controlling is the sign that she doesnt respect you and therefore the relationship is dead standing so he will leave or demand she change.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 01:45 AM

it's fair if others ask: what did you do to them? or even what did you fail to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 01:33 AM
0

that's what literally every romance novel is about a completely undeserving woman getting a man who is far too good for her by doing absolutely nothing to attract him but exist
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 01:56 AM
0

it is avg, its just avg for as OP said " man who is above the age of 30 " aka a population of people that is mostly married
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 01:38 PM
1

im not im simply stating the clear facts that male media depicts men overcoming what is usually superhuman levels of adversity and then they get rewarded with relationship success. Whereas womens media says that the female equivalent of a socially inept gaming porn addicted loser deserves to have amazing success purely becuase reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 01:16 PM
1

No it cant becuase its not 1 to 1, if you say have $100 less tax revenue, you can only reduce spending by $30 becuase you still need the rest of the $70 to pay for costs not directly(or less directly) linked to population size like infrastructure maintenance for example. So it wont offset your country just collapses.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 02:24 AM
0

no rejecting feminism would fix the issue
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 02:20 AM
1

why should a plain normal shy girl that doesnt put in any effort btw, if you read these novels the women never make any effort to advance the relationship or show interest, get a ultra mega chad?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 02:12 AM
1

We like to believe ANY woman is worth ALL the effort. And here's the problem with letting women write their own social narratives.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 02:11 AM
3

And those nerds always face and conquer massive amounts of adversity, With most cases the protag only really getting the girl after they have prevented some sort of world ending calamity, if they ever do bc there are plenty where they dont get the girl they want. So actually if we are comparing media womens media tells them to massively over value themselves and mens tells them to massively devalue themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 02:09 AM
1

Yeah redpill is just teaching young men how to play a game women have been playing forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 02:02 AM
0

but mandatory paternity test in concept are voluntary as they aren't forcing the farther to get a test but stopping the mother from preventing one.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 03:21 AM
0

If paternity tests were to become mandatory, we would also need a way to make sure there's a way to find the actual father. Not really, the aim is simply just to make sure the child is the child of the expected farther
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 03:20 AM
3

Yeah i dont believe anything from vox lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 02:36 AM
6

Countries far more "socially progressive" than the usa have half of less of the rate of single parenthood than usa.(while "tradcon" countries redpillers circlejrrk about have similar or higher rate of single parenthood than usa). Hell, my country is far more socially progressive and has less then half of usa's single parenthood rate Im pretty sure its only Scandinavia but the reason is those countries have actually followed through with full equality, in that there are no traditional expectation…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 02:34 AM
2

because otherwise women have to pay for men's whims of not wearing a condom and then deciding he doesn't a kid It takes the woman agreeing aswell to have unprotected sex ​ you're also ignoring the fact that obtaining an abortion isn't easy. i am guessing its because you are completely unaware of it. Most abortions are entirely for convenience
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 02:24 AM
3

It definitely is becuase none of the progressive principles that feminism claims to champion are ever applied to women. They are always used to restrict and disempower men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 02:19 AM
2

The obvious answer is that they are grifters just following what's popular at the moment, but why is this certain gift successful then? If you think calling people a grifter is ever an obvious answer, you have lost the plot.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 02:16 AM
2

I dont it has tbh. Sneako not only was a massive youtuber before he went trad con and he really got his biggest wave of fame when he was more redpill then trad con. Tate aswell was his most viral not when he went full muslim but before when he was just manosphere/rp adjacent. Really I dont think any of the tradcon manosphere guys would be nearly as big as they are if they went straight tradcon, they allways gain the most following while red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 02:14 AM
4

But they aren't openly stating them are they? And infact if they make it obvious they are acting on those preferences they deeply shamed. Women on the other hand get to openly state their preferences and clearly act on them with impunity.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 02:41 AM
2

Men like younger women becuase they are more attractive and less jaded. And its women prefer who men who earn more then them. So the claim of targeting partners who are easier to abuse is just cope.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 01:09 AM
1

It has higher chances to turn abusive No they dont becuase what determines abuse has nothing to do age or money. Infact men who have less money then their wives are more likely to be abusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 12:34 AM
1

also its largely a one way scenario where women can land in either initially but very very rarely does a woman ever transition from a whore into marriage quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 06:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter