TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

latepostdaemon Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by latepostdaemon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

LOL. You're one of those.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 01:48 PM
2

The article pulls each rule out of context, when really every preceding rule revolves around rule #4. It's her body, and she decides what she wants to do with it, not her boyfriend, not her dad. That's all. I don't sanction what she does with her body because her body is not mine. You don't sanction what she does with her body because her body is not yours. She makes the rules about what she does with her body. See rules 1-3. It's not saying "I have a vagina so what I say over any aspect of our …
/r/MensRights08/12/14 12:00 AM
0

Says the person running around calling people perpetual victims on the internet. It's a free game here. You might want to leave if you can't handle it. You definitely shouldn't chide others for not minding their business when you're not minding your own.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 04:09 AM
0

Then mind your own business? Who gives a shit?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 05:26 PM
0

You fail to see the connotation of your responses. This is not my fault. /shrug. Instead, you decide that everyone who suggests that you may have come off as aggressive, is being a perpetual victim. The simple suggestion that you may not have been as pleasantly educational as you think you have been, does not warrant someone a label of a perpetual victim lol. If anyone is a perpetual victim, it is you because you cannot handle a difference in opinion. It's okay, time will hopefully grant you the…
/r/MensRights26/08/13 05:52 AM
-2

You find a victim in every last opinion that you come across that disagress with you, don't you?
/r/MensRights26/08/13 01:03 AM
-2

It's the aggression you expressed, silly.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 09:30 PM
-5

Not really, you bullied her then she placated you to get you to stop.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 03:23 AM
1

Meh, nothing, no point in trying to get input from someone to hear out their cause. Way to represent your community.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 05:40 PM
1

Negative how? Negative in the sense that "isn't" is a negative as opposed to it's positive "is"? So? You said it, now back up your words. so first you said: "Awful" is as subjective as it gets. There's nothing inherently exploitive about that. in response to me trying to give insight on what these people MIGHT mean by women being "exploited" in porn. So the request, to put it as clear as possible, was for you to give reasoning that being put in degrading positions for their employment isn't expl…
/r/MensRights24/07/13 05:13 PM
1

Asking you to give detail about HOW it's not inherently exploitative, to gain more understanding of your claim, is an unfair question??? You made the claim, and I want you to back it up so I can understand you.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 04:47 PM
1

Seriously, are people not allowed to ask questions here anymore? Very welcomingly hostile of you.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 03:44 PM
1

This is what I was looking for, thanks! Can you help me understand your scenario for the exploration part? I'm not quite understanding because it seems like porn is a job like any other job in that you get paid for what your doing/screen time/popularity. You know? I mean, I could see that being exploitation if they weren't getting paid or being legitimately forced into doing it because you were...idk kidnapped?? Explain like I'm five D:
/r/MensRights24/07/13 02:00 PM
-1

Meh. it's not like a good amount of arguments around here aren't subjective. How do you think there isn't anything inherently exploitative about that?
/r/MensRights24/07/13 02:17 AM
0

I think when they say exploited, it's not about pay. When I think of women exploited in porn, the exploitation goes as far as the bulk of porn that has the woman in a role that just looks...awful. Like the OH BITCH, TAKE IT! TAKE IT YOU WHORE! type of position. Preeeeetttttttyyyy sure that's the kind of exploitation they're talking about, which is on the writers/producers/directors. Do we have stats on the genders of these writers/producers/directors and the types of porn they put out there?
/r/MensRights24/07/13 01:11 AM
2

Thanks for the information. I think that's a shame. There are definitely men's rights causes like that that are highly important and over looked. Did you see the thing the MBTA did with their advertisements on the train about sexual harassment and stuff? They made adds featuring both males and females as victims instead of just portraying it as only women being victims of that kind of crap. That seems like a big step, right?
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:15 AM
1

Thanks dude. So what's up with all of the other opposing statistics out there? Why aren't these prevailing if this is the case? What's the agenda?
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:48 PM
1

It's a research paper. The whole time, even though he's trying to fall under his own tittles of trying to prove gender symmetry, he's falling back and forth that he could be wrong but possibly right. His discussion is highly situational, and he's not even firm on his own findings. Hell, when I looked up gender symmetry on Wiki, those discussions seemed inconclusive outside of specific situations. I'm not trying to dismiss you, since the gender symmetry is a new idea for me, i'm trying to get a b…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 04:37 AM
1

The second one isn't exactly a reliable/credible resource, could you give me another one? Also, what page in the first link?
/r/MensRights04/07/13 12:32 AM
1

That's what I figured. I was wondering why this hadn't been mentioned haha.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 08:32 PM
0

As I stated in another comment: 90% to 96% of child sexual abuse is perpetrated by males. http://www.childabusesolutions.com/child_sexual_abuse_fact_sheet.pdf For over all domestic abuse: From 1994 to 2010, about 4 in 5 victims of intimate partner violence were female. http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=4536 -Males were 83% of spouse murderers and 75% of dating partner murderers. -Most perpetrators of sexual violence are men. Among acts of sexual violence committed against women since …
/r/MensRights03/07/13 08:02 PM
2

Is there a significant amount that don't offer it or something?
/r/MensRights03/07/13 06:02 PM
8

Planned Parenthood has mens health services that include STD screening and treatment. http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topics/men-4285.htm
/r/MensRights03/07/13 05:14 PM
2

Hold up. Can someone explain to me why no one here apparently believes "women are the primary victims of violence and especially sexual and domestic violence"? Why do you guys believe otherwise when shown clear statistics that prove at least that? I'd really like to understand that point.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 04:48 PM
-1

Funny thing is, I personally have never met one. So you've never met a man OR a woman who abuses their spouse? Does that make them not exist? Nope! These people are the people who think physical abuse by either gender, because they are committing it. So, super funny thing. The problem with that article is the fact that it is showing statistics of one situation. Not an overall situation, so you have failed to actually prove me wrong on that one. If we're going to talk about child sexual abuse, bo…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 04:26 PM
0

Sir/your highness/good king....Not emphasizing an entire phrase that is crucial to it's meaning is taking it out of context. Yes, it's all there for people to see, but you're replying to a section of an incomplete idea. Don't bother, I'm not going to waste my time trying to change your mind about a side note. One of us can just add the side note and not assume a hierarchy to grant dignity in a discussion in order for it to not just be shut down. This arrogance, and what I stated in my last comme…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 12:22 AM
2

If they're popular in "feminist-learning media", that's where they're trending. I didn't particularly think this article was bad, though I am aware of the articles that are particularly bad existing. The vibe I got from it was that the guy wanted to teach his son to be a decent person, and in this case they emphasized some feminine things that aren't only feminine(which was the reason they were emphasizing it). If anything, I thought men's rights might enjoy this article because of the things th…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 12:14 AM
-11

While I do my research, tell me about why you think these articles are written? What could possibly inspire them to exist?
/r/MensRights02/07/13 09:37 PM
-15

Where did he say that it was the default state? You're assuming just as much as you think he's assuming. He said "the temptation toward dickishness is going to be a powerful thing at some point." Do you not understand what temptation means? You could easily do a role reversal in this article and switch the kid to being a girl, and say bitchness instead of dickishness.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 09:00 PM
0

Firstly, don't cut and paste out of context. This gets you no where in your cause. It's not respectable, as well as not at all adding any kind of validity in your further statements. This is entirely besides the point though, I'm just tired of seeing this kind of tactic on this sub. Anywho... Are you so diluted to think gender discrimination against students in public school is tolerated nowadays? Or where are you from that this is different than in the U.S.? I'm speaking from experience in Texa…
/r/MensRights02/07/13 08:55 PM
1

Ahh, I see. Thanks! Yeah, those differences are differences I'm aware of. It's just like, look, if you want to be compensated for behavioral differences that most likely occur from a result of the way you've been raised by your family(which a school system cannot help), then get home schooled. Public school doesn't have the resources to change the entire system for half of their students.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:44 AM
2

Did I literally say there's no difference? No. I did not. I asked you to provide the studies that would prove you right. You seem to be assuming these differences are vastly remarkable in these cases to make neural differences a huge marker to rely on. So why are you dodging the chance to back it up? There are very obviously some differences, point out the ones that are remarkable enough to give your cause some worth.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 01:44 AM
5

It does not make it a men's issue just because it happens more. It is a men's issue when it is exclusive to men. Which it is not. That is statistically stated to you in this article. It constantly uses the words "more than" in comparison to these things happening to men vs. women. So it's not a "you all that are incapable of grasping the concept of statistical/general truths" on this end, as it is more so it is on your end. It is a statistical truth that(at least according to this article, haven…
/r/MensRights01/07/13 10:14 PM
2

Yeah, my main point remains that it's not like women now are fighting to keep themselves out of dangerous jobs. It's the opposite. Even you just gave an example of why it hasn't been changed. What I was responding to was a comment that insinuated that it was the opposite, that's all :p Thanks for your response as well!
/r/MensRights01/07/13 10:09 PM
1

If it's absurd, send me the medical journals that prove my "assumption" to be absurd, and I'll change my mind. Did I ever once say it was an entirely socially constructed concept? No. I did not. Did I insinuate it? Nope. Didn't do that either.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 10:06 PM
-2

What gender is keeping women from doing these job? Hmm? There are a lot of women who complain about not getting this equality because they are being deemed not fit by someone. Last time I checked it wasn't a bunch of women banding together saying they shouldn't be required to dangerous jobs because they have vaginas. It's been because they have a vagina, they're not capable of doing these dangerous jobs.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 08:07 PM
0

How?
/r/MensRights01/07/13 08:02 PM
15

Those methods help more than boys. It's not about gender, it's about learning style. Although those statistics apparently show that these things are more prevalent in males, it doesn't entirely exclude them from females having them. It's a more/less heard of type of situation. This article says itself that it's a behavior problem as well. If you're fucking around in class, any teacher, male or female, is going to rightly get pissed off. Should they grade you harder? No. Are their people that do …
/r/MensRights01/07/13 08:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter