TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

laudet Archive

View 5 posts and 99 comments by laudet on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Brilliant rebuttal. I find it really depressing arguing with ideologues like you. You are given evidence that your theories are incorrect, but instead of altering your worldview accordingly you retreat to juvenile insults.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:20 PM
1

Well duh. Why would someone invade with suicide bombers? How would that even work? When did I say Islam CAUSED suicide bombing? I said suicide bombers are religious zealots. Some of them are religious zealots. Many of them are not. The first female Palestinian suicide bomber was an atheist ambulance driver. And as the Tom Dispatch link reveals, Westerns have their own rich history of suicide missions, Christian or otherwise. It's an act of desperation, usually caused by being occupied by or figh…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:14 PM
2

Watched the whole thing. That's great! A lot of people refuse to look at material that may challenge their worldviews. dude is trying to mansplain Oh Please. Women had no say if we went to war, who we went to war with and for what. They had no say regarding laws. They had no say regarding which gender could do what. Absolute nonsense. In the first place, women have occupied positions of great power from the time of Ancient Egypt. Sending men off to fight and die in wars. In the second place, fem…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:07 PM
1

Until not too long ago 99% of people in power were men. This is utter lunacy. It's like claiming that only government officials have power while corporations, the CIA, various lobbies (including the feminist lobby) have no power whatsoever. Here's a good short video on female power in history. The guy isn't an MRA, just an historian. It may just alter your perceptions somewhat: Woman power in the past: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrgovSZ32Yg
/r/MensRights26/08/15 07:55 PM
2

Typical idiocy from the feminist. claims that the draft is actually discrimination against women because apparently your average woman really, really wants to be forced to fight and die in wars. blames the victims (male homeless people) for being homeless because they "don't want to go the doctor" (WTF?) and because there are more male than female veterans. uses the word "mansplain"! Shows blatant hypocrisy of feminist stance on reproductive rights (use a condom!) repeats the myth that only 2-10…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 07:40 PM
1

But men as well were under the control of other men. No. Men and women were and are under the control of rich men and women. If you think rich women don't exercise profound power and never have then you are frankly a misogynist. I don't regard women as helpless little flowers. Women have power, they exercise agency just like men, and they are just as capable of evil as men. The irony of your original statement "other sex at their disposal to make those cool skyscrapers" derives from the fact tha…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 07:32 PM
2

Note to feminists: please do not try to "reach out to men" or "help us" with our problems. Just be honest about your hate. The KKK doesn't have "outreach" programs for blacks.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 06:17 PM
1

an entire other sex at their disposal to make those cool skyscrapers. The "other sex" being men, I assume? I mean, it's not as though a lot of women die in construction or mining or the timber industry. Whereas, in the 19th Century, there were hundreds of thousands of deaths in the American mining industry alone -- all of them men.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 06:14 PM
1

The theory of "cultural appropriation" is pretty idiotic in most cases. That's how cultures work -- they intermix and evolve. Very few cultures have existed in complete isolation, at least not since the rise of agriculture.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 06:08 PM
1

Wasn't Bax an ANTI-feminist?
/r/MensRights26/08/15 06:00 PM
1

Where are the Christian and Buddhist and Hindu suicide bombers? Ever heard of Kamikaze pilots? I don't think they were Muslims. Here's an article on suicide missions by Westerners: http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175103/john_feffer_their_martyrs_and_our_heroes The most comprehensive study of suicide bombing determined that 95% of cases are caused by military occupation, not religion. Religion plays a role but it's not significant. It's more of a way to make the process more palatable. http://for…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 05:58 PM
6

That's an excellent analogy.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:55 PM
2

Horrifying.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 03:54 AM
1

I don't think Marx's name should be conflated with these nuts. There is a whole literature of "Marx was a misogynist" by feminists. If you want to blame Marx for the Bolsheviks or Mao, that's fair in some respects; but Marx has nothing to do with feminism except for the fact that a bunch of quasi-"Marxist" feminists decided during the 70's to use his theories to describe a completely different phenomenon now know as "the war of the sexes." One could make an argument that Engles contributed to th…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 01:49 AM
4

it's not fair to say to women that they must choose between raising a child in financial hardship, or go through an abortion. I agree. And the same is true of men. A black man was recently shot in the back by police when he fled from a warrant over failing to pay child support. He simply didn't earn enough that month, and didn't want to go to prison. We all have empathy for women. But it's quite revolutionary to have empathy for men.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 01:18 AM
3

Don't ja know? It's supposed to ironic misandry. Because hatred against one particular group -- straight white males -- is A-okay. They're "punching up," even though I'm guessing most of the posters there are middle or upper class privileged white women. I started a factory job at age 13. I doubt most of those women have broken a nail on the job. So yeah, it's "Ironic misandry." The only part missing is the irony. When white supremacists make "ironic" jokes about blacks, very few people find it …
/r/MensRights26/08/15 01:12 AM
14

Either way is an unjust intrusion into a woman's bodily autonomy. Mochacola answered your question below, but I think it's telling that you are appalled at the idea of intruding upon a woman's bodily autonomy, but regard it as a "lesser evil" that a man should be forced into the position of indentured servant, which is simply another form of "intrusion" on a person's bodily autonomy. I like your posts, incidentally, because they demonstrate over and over again that even relatively fair feminists…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 09:27 PM
2

Is the US government a terrorist group because it "terrorizes" black men with high incarceration rates"? And "terrorizes" them with stop and frisk policies? Terrorist organizations are defined groups with centralized leadership who specifically employ terror to affect political change. There's actually a CIA document from the Huk insurrection in the Philippines where it is recommended that assets use "exemplary criminal violence" and "terror" to discourage would-be rebels. More recently, death s…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 08:00 PM
6

This is probably because the notion that feminism being a terrorist group is stupid. Incredibly stupid. Feminists terrorize women by claiming that 1 in 4 will be raped in their lifetimes. Feminists terrorize men by attempting to reverse due process rights and ignoring or downplaying the rate of false accusations. Feminists terrorize children and male domestic violence victims by promoting the Duluth model. There was an article posted here yesterday by a member of Fathers4Justice. It mentioned in…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 07:34 PM
1

Why don't feminists care more about women in third-world countries who are being treated like property. Countries like Saudia Arabia where there is an actual rape culture. Women are not treated like "property" in any country unless it happens to be a war zone. Rape is punishable by death in Saudi Arabia.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 06:48 PM
8

The key word being "earn." Shockingly, if a woman works less than a man she will earn less. Children can understand this concept, why can't feminists?
/r/MensRights25/08/15 06:25 PM
6

I don't think the poster thought "this is hilarious! it's so funny that men get treated this way!" The "humor" derives from the irony of the juxtaposition. It's unsettling and therefore darkly comic. However apparently the mods agreed with you.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 06:11 PM
17

Attention. She wanted to be the "grieving friend" who would be given sympathy. Similar to Munchausen by proxy. Evil, evil stuff.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 04:26 PM
3

BTW, since you're taking on sexism and religion you may want to check out the other side of the coin: In Sanctifying Misandry, Katherine Young and Paul Nathanson challenge an influential version of modern goddess religion, one that undermines sexual equality and promotes hatred in the form of misandry - the sexist counterpart of misogyny. To set the stage, the authors discuss two massively popular books - Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code and Riane Eisler's The Chalice and the Blade - both of which …
/r/MensRights25/08/15 03:54 PM
2

R/Feminism is that way --->
/r/MensRights25/08/15 03:46 PM
3

comfortable in their own skin I'm sure telling men their masculinity is "toxic" will help!
/r/MensRights25/08/15 03:01 PM
8

That's a post from "Against Men's Rights". It's a sewer of hatred and bigotry.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 01:49 PM
2

I used the example of hunter-gatherers because that is how we have survived for 99% of our history. There was no class segregation (classes didn't exist in any formal sense) but there WAS occasional sexual segregation. I think it's only fair that we look at what has worked in the past. I don't think racial segregation and sexual segregation derive from the same causes. Racial segregation is based on ignorance and bigotry, [occasional] sexual segregation may derive from real needs and real differ…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 11:09 PM
5

There's nothing "primal" about seeing someone's paycheck. It's not the numbers that are attractive but the power/strength that those numbers entail. Women are attracted to strength (often described as "confidence"). As per the study: “Because women bear the cost of pregnancy and lactation, they often faced the adaptive problem of acquiring resources to produce and support offspring, while men faced adaptive problems of identifying fertile partners and sought cues to fertility and future reproduc…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 10:11 PM
2

Interesting anecdote, thanks. I remember when the girls in my highschool created a "best ass" list. It was sorta like that South Park episode where they ranked the boys based on attractiveness. I managed to be placed in the upper half, which was nice, but I remember thinking how fucking awful it must have been to be last. I can't remember the poor kid's name, but I do remember thinking that there was no real difference between his ass and the "haught" guys' asses, except for the unrelated fact t…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 09:49 PM
1

Well, even hunter-gatherer tribes, which are highly egalitarian, have male and female only spaces/rituals. So I don't agree. I think we should have mostly non-segregated spaces but also allow for segregated spaces. This applies to school as well. In general, boys and girls have different methods of learning (and different maturation levels). So schools should allow boys and girls to choose different learning methods rather than sticking them into a "one-size-fits all" (ie gynocentric) paradigm. …
/r/MensRights24/08/15 09:43 PM
4

Britain's roll-call of shame has included baby Peter Connolly, beaten to death by his mum and her boyfriend whilst his dad was denied access to his son on the basis of false allegations. The "Baby P" [Peter Connolly] saga is the single most horrific case of child abuse I've ever encountered, and I've studied such cases in depth. After the mother made up false allegations that prevented the father from seeing his son, she hooked up with a handsome 6-foot-five brute she called "every woman's dream…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 09:23 PM
9

Great article. It properly acknowledges that the revolt against victimhood culture, identity politics and authoritarian feminism is not limited to the right (though is currently dominated by the right), and that authoritarianism and censorship are not limited to the left. The sooner we develop a more sophisticated understanding of politics than "left/right" or "Democrat/Republican" the sooner we can put an end to this madness.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 06:26 PM
5

http://news.utexas.edu/2015/08/06/genders-differ-dramatically-in-evolved-mate-preferences
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:51 PM
7

Partner preferences are more socialized than biological. It's a nice utopian idea but does not appear to be supported by the scientific data. AUSTIN, Texas — Men’s and women’s ideas of the perfect mate differ significantly due to evolutionary pressures, according to a cross-cultural study on multiple mate preferences by psychologists at The University of Texas at Austin. The study of 4,764 men and 5,389 women in 33 countries and 37 cultures showed that sex differences in mate preferences are muc…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:40 PM
2

Well, technically it's a conspiracy fact that the CIA funded Steinem, the only question is why...It's also a conspiracy fact that the head of the San Francisco FBI field office in 1969 suggested using the women's movement to divide the left. Finally, it's a fact that CIA-linked foundations like the Ford and Rockefeller foundations began heavily infesting in gender and ethnic studies during the 70's and 80's. Then as now, the CIA had tons of money to play with and very little accountability. At o…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:59 PM
10

It's called hypergamy. Feminists claim it is caused by women having less financial resources than men due to the patriarchy, so women compensate by selecting higher earning partners. Personally I think it's at least partly instinctual. Male doctors don't have a problem dating (attractive) female secretaries, but the reverse is exceedingly rare even in our age of "equality." I think it comes down to female sexual advantage (male attraction) combined with the fact that females bear the burden of p…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:15 PM
1

I get it. You've all been brain melded. Not a fun experience. Get Well.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 12:50 AM
1

I think you missed my point, which is basically the same as your own.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 11:29 PM
3

If you're going to downvote, explain why you are doing so. Only fair.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 11:23 PM
9

Feminism will eventually spit out an Elliot Rodgers. It already has. And I'm not talking about Valerie Solanas. Women are more likely to use proxy power than men. Feminists use the state, the most violent instrument in history. Female violence is most often indirect, allowing for plausible deniability, but that doesn't make it any less harmful to the victim. It would be almost impossible to quantify how many men have committed suicide, for example, due to gynocentric custody and domestic violenc…
/r/MensRights23/08/15 07:48 PM
5

I honestly believe that The Guardian will go down in history as the most misandrist mainstream publication in history. It's honestly worse than Jezebel at this point. They might as well just replace the gender section with the SCUM manifesto.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 06:33 PM
11

It's a defense mechanism. For all the feminist blathering about patriarchy and male dominance, women subconsciously understand that they would be defenceless against the elements without male strength and provision. When men talk about our problems it is intuited as "weakness," even though it actually takes great strength for men to stand up for ourselves as a sex. The irony, as others have pointed out, is that feminists simultaneously complain that men are not feminine enough. You can see this …
/r/MensRights23/08/15 06:02 PM
2

Gloria Steinem's links to the CIA Has anyone ever come up with a good explanation of just what the hell the CIA was doing funding Steinem and Ms. Magazine? Here she is discussing it after the link was exposed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HRUEqyZ7p8 She claims that the CIA was "enlightened" and "progressive". That's difficult to reconcile with the fact that during the same time period they were overthrowing any government around the world that embraced policies slightly to the left of Genghi…
/r/MensRights23/08/15 05:48 PM
6

The fact that the extremely broad term "self harm" is included makes the statistic irrelevant. Stop trying to diminish the epidemic of male suicide.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 07:58 AM
0

a woman whose been abused in the sex trade probably doesn't want to deal with more men in a position of power. This is exactly the problem with feminism right here. You assume that "men" are responsible for the sex trade, when in fact it is both men and women. "Of the 470 news releases, 160 were specifically related to human trafficking for either sex or labor. Suspects were identified as men, women, families or couples. Looking at the table below, it appears human trafficking was a family busin…
/r/MensRights23/08/15 07:35 AM
4

Stop posting about this clown on Men's Rights boards.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 06:32 AM
2

being anti-feminist is NOT being "tolerant of other beliefs". Cause, anti. No one should tolerate bigotry. That would defeat the purpose of tolerance.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 04:33 AM
0

I did. A comparison is not the same as a direct analogy. Slavery is pretty much the worst form of oppression imaginable. The MRM is however a human's rights movement, and it's very important to have women supporting us. We are looking to end child genital mutilation, the psychological abuse and discrimination facing boys in school, the denial of children contact with their fathers, the denial of fathers contact with their children, discrimination against male sexual abuse and domestic abuse vict…
/r/MensRights23/08/15 04:32 AM
-1

I see nothing wrong with showing appreciation for women who refuse to embrace a hate movement against men and boys. It's similar to the appreciation that blacks showed white abolitionists, freedom riders etc.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 03:51 AM
7

There's an easy way of deciphering whether something is "bad" or "good" according to feminist doctrine. If men enjoy something it is bad, if women enjoy something it is good. The difficult part arises when women enjoy doing something that men find "good." Attractive women showing off their bodies is a prime example. Attractive women love it and so do men, but it makes unattractive women jealous. So they created a bullshit theory called "objectification."
/r/MensRights22/08/15 11:37 PM
5

"Our" problem? Or women's problem?
/r/MensRights22/08/15 05:47 AM
2

"Miss Daisy, I'm just tryin' to drive you to the sto!"
/r/MensRights22/08/15 03:53 AM
12

I'll give it a shot. Feminism is the bizarre belief that men and women are exactly the same except for reproductive organs, despite mountains of scientific evidence to the contrary. Feminism is the bizarre belief that throughout recorded history, men have set about to oppress women despite men having their first and most intense emotional bonds with women. Feminism is the bizarre belief that "benevolent sexism" -- the desire by men to protect women and make sure they are happy -- is a minor hicc…
/r/MensRights22/08/15 03:19 AM
7

She gives away the plot in the first sentence: Allies do not actually help the cause because they cookie-seek for their behavior She views male feminists as children or dogs looking for a treat from their superiors. And in a way she's right. I don't think it's a big mystery why feminists treat their male "allies" with such contempt. Think about it from the POV of a slave-master in the antebellum South: which person did they respect more, the house negro who scraped and begged at their master's f…
/r/MensRights22/08/15 02:47 AM
2

Sounds like a cross between the "house negro" and Stockholm Syndrome.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 11:25 PM
8

That would defeat the purpose of incessant whining and sadistic bullying.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 11:17 PM
7

There is a great deal of anger by men toward feminism, and that anger is entirely justified. When you come on this site and say "I'm a feminist" it's like a white guy attending a BlackLivesMatter rally wearing a pointy hood. So you should expect some harsh words. However unlike the feminist boards we don't ban people who disagree.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 10:23 PM
9

I'm sure you yourself don't support the MRA sect that wants to abolish woman in the workplace or remove child support. There is no "MRA sect" that advocates this. Feminism hasn't lynched anyone as far as I know Many of the original feminists were part of the KKK. So that's wrong. Today, feminists are attempting to ensure that no men, whether black, white or otherwise, have due process rights when accused of rape. Here's a must read article on the subject. The similarities between the feminist "w…
/r/MensRights21/08/15 10:19 PM
13

It's not just the one author. She's talking about #thingsFeministMenHaveSaidToMe. How do you feel about the twitter campaign?
/r/MensRights21/08/15 08:21 PM
2

Do women think they are "sticking it to the man" with this sort of idiocy? Because it doesn't reflect well on women at all. Same with the ads portraying men as buffoons. Only insecure people and children need to validate their egos by pretending they are superior to others.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 07:30 PM
4

Sorry to hear that. You'll probably get a lot of posters saying, "in future, don't talk about gender politics with friends." I disagree. If they are truly your friends they won't ditch you just for disagreeing with their political views. And really, do you want to hang out with "friends" who hold bigoted views? The other important point is that if we don't speak out, who will? One thing I will say is that it takes a great deal of tact and delicacy to debate these things, and sometimes you have t…
/r/MensRights21/08/15 06:51 PM
1

There's an interesting BBC documentary on the origins of the Industrial Revolution in England. The host takes us to a museum of the first "luxury store." He mentions that the useless pretty trinkets were all marketed toward women. This was during a time when feminists claim that women were just their husband's property/slaves. But even then women were evidently controlling the house-hold budget.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 06:17 PM
2

What would that have to do with men's rights unless men were being blamed for pollution in the dominant narrative? Well, I do recall an article from Common Dreams where the author flat out stated that men "drive global capitalism." Perhaps we do. But it's mostly so women can buy shit.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 06:12 PM
23

Keep the jokes. Eliminate the practice.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 12:30 AM
2

LMAO I think that sums it up.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 12:16 AM
6

I agree. There are free speech issues involved but this has nothing to do with Men's Rights. Hell, Roosh V himself has repeatedly stated that he wants nothing to do with the Men's Rights Movement, and I'm pretty sure the feeling is mutual. I had a post deleted the other day involving Gamergate, which imo IS tangentially related to the men's rights movement. Roosh V is not.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 08:19 PM
70

I think the problem in this case is that male prison rape IS viewed as a joke, unlike, say, the rape of women. Rape jokes about women can be darkly humorous precisely because we regard the act as so horrific; conversely, jokes about male prison rape derive their humour from the fact that no one gives a shit about the victim.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 07:14 PM
6

There's a big difference. Those magazines are targeted toward women. Zoo is targeted toward heterosexual men. If men feel pleasure, feminists get upset. Men are supposed to be whipping ourselves over our "sinful" desires.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 05:27 AM
3

Unfortunately I can't find the link, but there was article on Huffpo about current female fashion choices that men hate, and current male fashion choices that women hate. Interestingly, the study noted that women are much more likely to police the fashion choices of their partners than vice versa.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 02:25 AM
17

"Why can't they be proactive and provide a supportive environment for their employees as well? This magazine contributes to a toxic culture where women are seen as sexual objects." Translation: I'm unattractive and I'm jealous of attractive women. Also, how dare men take enjoyment in their sexuality. That's only for everyone except straight men.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 02:16 AM
7

The comments on the original article are refreshing. The tide really is changing.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 11:40 PM
6

Has anyone banned you yet? I didn't think so. You shouldn't be surprised to be getting down votes. I understand that when you were dating society had a strange mix of traditionalism and feminism. Well we have the same thing now: except it's women that are enforcing traditionalism while men demand equality. Funny how the pendulum swings. ;)
/r/MensRights19/08/15 05:58 AM
12

I'm not sure to whom these people are supposed to be appealing. Certainly not straight men. Here's an article: "Maxim Is Embracing Feminism and Not Screwing it Up" Men’s magazine Maxim is now up to its fourth issue since Kate Lanphear was announced as its first female editor-in-chief last year. Lanphear has made it clear that Maxim is shunning its oiled-up, in-your-face sex appeal in favor of a more subtle and discerning approach, going for boobless cover shots, non-gross photo stories, and byli…
/r/MensRights19/08/15 04:05 AM
1

Wow. This gets more and more bizarre. http://ca.complex.com/style/2014/03/verified-banksy-facebook-page-is-fake Apparently Banksy's publicist later denied that Bansky even had a facebook page. This was revealed after the controversial post in question, and after millions of people were subscribing. I certainly don't want to spread falsehoods, so I'll update the post yet again.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 03:30 AM
5

Awful, awful selection of comments.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 02:52 AM
1

You're right. Now that I know this the title is indeed misleading. I will edit the post. Still, I don't understand how this became affiliated with Bansky in the first place. Are you saying that it wasn't posted on his Instagram or Facebook page?
/r/MensRights19/08/15 01:41 AM
3

I agree. It's long past time we started holding these hateful feminists to account.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 01:21 AM
1

Which link? The first one has 300 comments. You'll have to be specific. So far as I'm aware, no one is claiming that the text is Banky's, just that he posted the image on his instagram account.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 12:34 AM
1

proof?
/r/MensRights19/08/15 12:00 AM
4

That wasn't my intent. I myself am about as "left" as it gets. That's why I think it's important to criticize the left (or what it has become) when warranted. Otherwise we fall into group-think and authoritarianism.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 11:49 PM
2

That's really interesting. Did Banksy himself get cold feet like so many others who dare speak out against feminism?
/r/MensRights18/08/15 11:34 PM
5

Fair point. Just using my own experience: I didn't encounter anything about this on any websites/blogs associated (rightly or wrongly) with the left. Ranging from progressive to socialist to Marxist to anarchist to primitivist. Perhaps it simply flew under the radar.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 05:47 PM
6

Here's what this feminist has in mind: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVHYvUpeqKI It has been described as the most awkward simulated sex scene ever filmed. "Can I do X?" "Can I do Y"? No one, not even old ladies, have sex this way. You'll learn that if/when you lose your virginity. Men are not mind readers, nor can they be expected to ask permission for every escalation in a sexual encounter. If women don't like something they can simply say "No." Children know how to do this. Certainly women …
/r/MensRights18/08/15 04:30 PM
6

Reminds me of a joke: How many feminists does it take to change a lightbulb? One. She holds the bulb stationary and waits for the world to revolve around her.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 03:57 PM
10

There's still a fair amount of racism in society, but certainly it's gotten much better over time. That's my point. Hardcore racists DID once hold massive power in American society, until fairly recently in fact. President Coolidge was a supporter of the KKK. There were Eugenics programs in every major university (just as there are now Gender Studies i.e. Man-hating studies in every major university.) It would have seemed incomprehensible in 1915 that a hundred years later there would be a black…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 03:03 PM
1

i honestly believe woman have a higher pain tolerance than men It doesn't matter what you believe. You're wrong. http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=97662 "Study after study has shown that men have a higher tolerance for pain than women, according to researchers who seem to be making some progress in figuring out why."
/r/MensRights18/08/15 02:45 PM
1

It's feminist logic 101. If women suffer more from X, all attention must be paid to female victims. It doesn't matter if the breakdown of victims is 51:49 female to male, male victims should be ignored until they defeat teh patriarchy.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:52 AM
217

The tone of this article, written by a female, is strongly reminiscent of the infamous Sharon Osbourne clip on the View, when the panel and a full studio audience of women laughed uproariously at a news story where a deranged woman cut off her husband's penis. Not only do most women seem to have no empathy for men, modern women seem to actually delight in hurting men. They won't even extend empathy to little boys. This behaviour is both childish and sadistic, like a little budding psychopath tea…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 05:08 AM
3

Keep posting buddy. Your disgusting apologetics for murderers and abusers highlight the complete and utter moral bankruptcy of feminism.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 04:35 AM
14

He/She is not an MRA but a feminist. I think it's great that feminists are participating on this board, if only to highlight the noxiousness of their worldview.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 04:30 AM
3

No one's saying she can't be a hypocrite. That's her prerogative. It's just more evidence of what we've been saying all along: feminists love traditionalism when it gives women free goodies and special privileges; the pretence to "equality" is just propaganda.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 04:27 AM
22

So long as you acknowledge that you're a massive hypocrite, that's fine. Traditionalist women at least have a consistent worldview. You feminists are a walking contradiction: you want "equality" and special treatment at the same time, equal rights with none of the responsibilities.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 01:08 AM
42

Do you claim to be a feminist? Just curious. I'm always astounded by the hypocrisy of your ilk. If you're a traditionalist who thinks the woman's place is in the home them I'm okay with expecting a man to pick up the check. But for a feminist to argue same is just off-the-charts hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 07:00 PM
1

It would have been if the moderator had actually let them speak. He interrupted so often that the crowd started heckling him.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 06:52 PM
1

Fathers who want and deserve 50/50 custody will almost always fight for it - and will usually (eventually) get it. What a disgusting thing to say. This only applies to men who are rich enough to fight for custody and overcome the enormous bias of the courts in favour of women.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 06:27 PM
1

The debate itself is frustrating. It's basically three journalists who know nothing about Gamergate vs. Milo, Sommers and Young. The moderator is hostile to Gamergate and constantly interrupts the panelists. He refuses them to allow discussion of feminism, even though it is impossible to understand why Gamergate has been met with so much hostility and unfair treatment in the media without referencing the power of feminists.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 06:17 PM
2

Here's Christina Hoff Sommer's opening statement: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/08/15/what-you-missed-this-afternoon-at-spj-airplay-from-christina-hoff-sommers/ Excerpt: In the past, writers at popular gaming websites like Kotaku and Polygon did a good job defending games from the false charge that they foster violence and mayhem. But when gender activists came along accusing games of fostering misogyny, the sites jumped on the bandwagon. There is no evidence that gamers in genera…
/r/MensRights17/08/15 05:54 PM
1

Is this properly confirmed or just some moron stirring up trouble? Probably some troll, but who knows. Wouldn't be the first time feminists have tried to silence their critics.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 05:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter