| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | This one is really sick.......Oh no, another neckbeard to save the day. | /r/MensRights | 30/07/11 03:20 PM |
| 1 | This one is really sick.......Excellent point. I am not pissed. I am flame baiting a bunch of whiny children. I did the same thing to 2nd amendment guys. I am not a 2nd amendment literalist. If you read the rest of my posts from that thread you would see that my point was that gunnit's position that the 2nd amendment should be taken to the absolute word without any common sense is ridiculous. | /r/MensRights | 30/07/11 02:46 AM |
| -7 | This one is really sick.......This subreddit is out of control. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/11 07:33 PM |
| -13 | This one is really sick.......Just out of curiosity, how old are you? | /r/MensRights | 29/07/11 03:03 PM |
| -19 | This one is really sick.......You are all idiots. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/11 02:59 PM |
| -11 | This one is really sick.......That doesn't make your original argument any more valid. Who needs the money is an important question. I'm not saying I support what the court did. The point is that your original assertion and the court decision can both be wrong. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/11 02:55 PM |
| -28 | This one is really sick.......Why does it matter who needs the money? It matters when the kids need the money. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/11 02:49 PM |
| -28 | This one is really sick.......So if you father children, you don't have a responsibility to take care of them? | /r/MensRights | 29/07/11 02:42 PM |
| -3 | Man sent to prison 36 years ago for rape/robbery. DNA evidence, tested decades later, showed another man's DNA on the victims' clothing. Court said that was not enough to overturn conviction. WTF?Do you understand what not the majority opinion means? | /r/MensRights | 29/07/11 01:08 PM |
| 1 | Does marriage reduce a woman to property? (cross-post from fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu, of all places)Same thing happens in a community property state. Anything earned during the marriage by labor is the property of both spouses. You only have legal title to one half. Spend more than that and you have converted property. However, explaining that and citing it is outside the scope of the thread, and I'm too lazy to do it. Point stands, you can steal from your spouse. | /r/MensRights | 11/07/10 01:14 AM |
| 6 | Does marriage reduce a woman to property? (cross-post from fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu, of all places)Its a really complicated answer that comes from a combination of property and family law but it is possible to steal from a spouse and be held liable. | /r/MensRights | 10/07/10 07:38 PM |
| 9 | Does marriage reduce a woman to property? (cross-post from fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu, of all places)Incorrect on all counts. It was a nice try though. | /r/MensRights | 10/07/10 05:36 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter