TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

layorz Archive

View 2 posts and 163 comments by layorz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

You're a fuckwit
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:54 AM
5

The appropriate response is an audible "Oh fuck off" and closing the webpage. Hopefully someone asks "What?" and you can say "Some feminist writer thinks fathers taking daughters out is creepy"
/r/MensRights25/11/17 06:45 PM
3

That's not how this works. At some point people are going to be drunk in a McDonalds (try every night of the week) and they're also going to make utter dicks of themselves on camera. You think because they're drunk all of a sudden surveillance shouldn't be a thing? Particularly surveillance that is there to prevent the business being targeted by bullshit claims and threats? ...are you the woman this post is about?
/r/MensRights16/11/17 06:44 PM
1

I love it how your reaction to his point was to victim blame him. That is ironic
/r/MensRights18/10/17 12:08 AM
4

It's Hey, since you seem to have forgotten black lives matter too Which is the problem. Who the fuck do you think you are telling me what is and isn't important to me? You don't dictate what matters to me, you don't tell me what I have "forgotten" about. The phrases implication is exactly why there is an "all lives" push back against it. The phrase implies that non-blacks don't care about blacks. Fuck that.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 12:06 AM
11

The irony
/r/MensRights07/10/17 03:40 PM
18

Be careful with this "us", winner
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:22 AM
35

Today in blaming the victim
/r/MensRights28/07/17 09:22 AM
0

Why is it so difficult for a man to keep his legs at reasonable distance so others can sit down? It's not, stop projecting
/r/MensRights27/07/17 08:10 PM
2

Pretty much. I didn't care that I was a black protagonist in GTA:San Andreas. Didn't think twice about it. It felt natural because that was just the setting of the game, based on LA street gangs. It was natural progression of the series that mirrored real life where Italian gangs were pushed out by black ones in certain cities and areas Now though, race in video games is being dictated not by setting, tone, story or natural progression. It's being dictated by external developer identity politics…
/r/MensRights13/07/17 07:12 PM
33

Just watch, when the sales of those games fail to meet expectations, they'll claim it's because of racism.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 08:51 AM
-7

I ain't a yank, autist
/r/MensRights12/07/17 12:27 PM
2

"Y'all" can't fucking read
/r/MensRights12/07/17 09:57 AM
130

I get the same result as OP when I google it. But for your perusal, the source of google's result: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/wifey So I mean, "one site" says this, but it's literally the oxford dictionary definition. I could pick up any oxford dictionary commonly found in schools and see this bullshit definition polluting peoples minds. But hey, just one site, right?
/r/MensRights12/07/17 04:35 AM
3

You sound like a little bitch
/r/MensRights25/06/17 11:51 PM
2

And letting one wrong keep going doesn't make anything right either. You either show the other side their hypocrisy or you be a complete pussy and do nothing. I can see which you picked.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 11:51 PM
3

man sits with legs slightly apart "This is patriarchy and infringes on my rights! I'll take a picture and campaign to my electorate officials to get a law to punish men for this!" Woman sits with legs slightly apart and a bag taking seat as well "Wow creepy why are you even looking there why would you take a picture wtf is wrong with you"
/r/MensRights25/06/17 05:50 PM
1

Median is literally the middle number. Not an average, not the mean, it is literally just the middle number when you list all data.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 04:15 AM
1

They aren't discrediting or discounting the male victims. They are correlating negative Islamic views on women with the fact that an Ariana Grande concert is much more of a teenage girls right of passage and expression than anything else. It's a very reasonable correlation to make. Why do YOU think they chose this concert?
/r/MensRights25/05/17 01:23 AM
-7

You're giving her a pussypass. You're assuming that someone's perspective of a situation that you know almost nothing about is "giving her a pussypass" based entirely on your own insecure biases against women Does it feel good to get misrepresented like that you condescending cunt?
/r/MensRights19/05/17 05:20 AM
24

There was a time where snapchat was a platform to send pictures to your friends, not a platform for snapchat management to virtue signal the shit out of
/r/MensRights13/05/17 05:00 AM
11

I'm sure this defense works in every academic institution across the world. Congratulations, you played yourself.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 11:33 AM
3

This is infuriating. Did you ask her to move the bag like a normal person? I'm sure you ask this of everyone woman who complains about manspreading.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 07:43 AM
10

"Criticism" faggots, pussy shit, cameltoe showing HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
/r/MensRights20/04/17 07:41 AM
0

I guess the term cuntspreading is a bit too in your face
/r/MensRights20/04/17 05:48 AM
1

Don't be so fucking stupid
/r/MensRights30/01/17 09:22 AM
3

Yeah, jumping to the extremes is a great way to make a point, except, it's not, because I could do the same to you and say if you have such a problem with government attempts to dissuade criminals, lets forgo the whole lot and decriminalize everything and remove government intervention altogether! You ignorant fuck
/r/MensRights30/01/17 09:21 AM
1

Lol you crybaby fuck, you're effectively arguing that because the government employs actions to persuade people not to commit crime, it means people aren't free. If freedom in your mind means the ability to commit crime with impunity, then you can go fuck yourself, you condescending cunt
/r/MensRights30/01/17 09:18 AM
1

Do we really want to live under such cctv cameras Do I want the police to have the ability to track and catch the criminals that attack and rob and kill innocent people in the street? Yeah I do. Cheers
/r/MensRights30/01/17 09:17 AM
6

tl;dr is that the girls claimed a guy in a chatroom told them to do it, and the police/judge rejected the claim. Thanks for making me read through that god-awful bullshit in that horrid format just to see that you have made a pointless thread that literally has nothing to do with mens rights. Fucking thank you for that.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 09:04 AM
6

Didnt he appear in a Sargon video?
/r/MensRights30/01/17 07:50 AM
2

Thats not an implication, its an inference
/r/MensRights29/01/17 04:00 AM
-8

Prove it. Show me a case where men did these exact actions and got heavier sentences. Until then, shut the fuck up and don't make bullshit generalized statements that have no real backing beyond your opinion.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 03:58 AM
2

The point is it should be EQUAL, regardless of difficulty Why? The test is a general test to encourage overall fitness, not a specialized test for specific job requirements. This is for acceptance into the academy, not a strength test to see if you can perform specific duties. If we were talking, for example, about firefighters? Then yes, the physical tests involved there should absolutely be equal because there absolutely is a minimum requirement to be able to hoist someone on your shoulders wh…
/r/MensRights02/01/17 10:10 AM
1

One would rather be raped than to be a victim of genital mutilation, because genital mutilation is worse than rape is Unless one would rather be circumcised than raped, in which case your statement is worthless and contradicted
/r/MensRights27/12/16 09:51 AM
0

If the choice was to be shot in the head, or forced to have sex, I would almost guarantee most people would bend over. This shows that there are things that are objectively worse than rape. Am I wrong about that? If the choice was circumcision or rape, I'd take the circumcision. This shows that whether or not things are worse than others is subjective. Congratulations on providing me the easiest way to show how fucking stupid your logic really is.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 05:00 AM
1

Whether or not the damage is permanent doesn't determine which damage is worse. A broken leg can be healed, but that doesn't mean manic depressives are better off. The idiocy of thinking it does mean this is staggering. Are you trying to be illogical just so you can be hateful towards women?
/r/MensRights27/12/16 04:59 AM
0

Sex itself is something any (normal) adult can elect to do.It is being forced to do it that OP is comparing to genital mutilation of minors. Note that very few adults DO elect to to be genitally mutilated. Indeed sex IS something adults can elect to do. Rape is not sex. It IS being sexually assaulted. That's like, your opinion man. I dislike circumcision on babies too, I'm not moronic enough to call it sexual assault, however. It is YOUR logic that would be laughable if it were not so dangerous.…
/r/MensRights27/12/16 04:56 AM
1

Note that the OP said "genital mutilation" and then went on to talk about minors Note that OP said "genital mutilation" and then referred to circumcision contrasted with rape
/r/MensRights27/12/16 04:52 AM
1

You just compared body modification that you disagree with to a violent sex crime. Think about that for a second. A simple procedure that any male adult can elect to do for purely aesthetic reasons, and you compared it to the forced penetration and assault of a person and said the former is worse. You may as well say getting your child's ear pierced is worse than sexual assault. Your real issue here is not with genital mutilation like you try to portray, your issue is with circumcision being per…
/r/MensRights26/12/16 10:46 AM
1

Yeah, there was a thread about migrants in Germany. Someone claimed that migrants in Germany are abused because Germany is a monocultural society, so I said "As opposed to the multicultural society the migrants came from". Instant ban, no reply when I questioned it. Without a doubt /r/feminism is an ignorant echochamber of nazi mods
/r/MensRights19/12/16 03:15 AM
2

Is it really that big a deal? It seems pretty obviously sarcasm coming from a place of frustration to me Would you consider it a big deal if a feminist was pretty obviously being sarcastic while frustrated when she says that all men are rapist creepy pervs?
/r/MensRights03/12/16 07:53 PM
1

See this post? This post right here? It isn't a post about men's rights. It literally does nothing but broadly generalize based on "limited experiences" with a touch of slut shaming there too. This post is a blatant misogynistic post and flies completely in the face of what men's rights is actually about - men's rights. This sub isn't for women hating trash like this. Sad fucking day for men's rights when we advocate and praise a slut shaming dickhead using anecdote to disparage an entire gender
/r/MensRights03/12/16 07:51 PM
-12

Women take longer because they sit and wipe every time, so a man in the woman's bathroom lengthens the line to the woman's bathroom without any necessity beyond the man not feeling aggrieved that his biological function of pissing is a tad less infringing on the amount of time he spends in the bathroom than that of a woman
/r/MensRights27/11/16 09:10 AM
1

General reminder that the point is and always will be that trying to stop one gender from this 'shaming' is hateful, and you should actually be advocating the other gender being allowed to do it as well
/r/MensRights03/11/16 03:34 AM
1

The more common forms of cancer are given more funding because treating and preventing the most common forms of cancer is more beneficial than sinking excess funding into rarer cancers. It is also more beneficial to direct funding at forms of cancer that affect both genders. Breast cancer affects both men and women. Ovarian or testicular cancer does not. Comparatively, prostate cancer is far more common than uterus cancer, and hence receives greater funding. Breast cancer is more common than pro…
/r/MensRights28/10/16 05:12 AM
1

The sound of struggling, which was heard already in the recording when he physically restrains her prior to the weapon incident, and the sound of someone struggling to draw breath because of pressure on their throat, are vastly different.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 08:28 PM
-3

Its a joke. Anyone calling double standard is as bad as a SJW. There is zero wrong with her saying it and your belief that a male candidate wouldn't be allowed to say it has no bearing on that. Don't try hide a Clinton hate thread under the guise of men's rights ETA: look at all the manchildren having a sook. If you were truly promoting mens rights you'd argue that male politicians should be able to make such jokes in joke interviews, instead you're demonizing a female for being allowed to do it…
/r/MensRights22/10/16 09:24 AM
2

She's so delusional
/r/MensRights21/10/16 07:17 PM
-12

It seems the jury disagreed with you. It seems the jury disagreed with each other for 4 days of deliberation before finding the prosecution has not proven beyond reasonable doubt that Tostee is guilty of murder or manslaughter. I have inferred that you are taking "not guilty of murder or manslaughter" and attempting to say he is innocent of any crime that night. That's not how the law works, however. He's not guilty of murder and manslaughter, nothing more or less. Actually, reread my post altog…
/r/MensRights20/10/16 07:09 AM
-14

Being found not guilty =/= being found innocent. If he had locked a 12 year old on his balcony, there would be no discussion about his culpability. He didn't murder her but IMO he is 100% guilty of negligent homicide. He denied her decision to leave, and forced her on to the balcony to the point he was literally strangling her (literal accepted fact). He is absolutely responsible for her death as sans his actions of violence and locking her on the balcony,she'd still be alive. This is quite simp…
/r/MensRights20/10/16 06:18 AM
0

I guess you could worry about the fact that Australian men can have their sperm harvested by people who they aren't married to Only if you're dead, you have a de facto partner, the partner requests permission via courts over a number of months, and the request goes uncontested. But yeah, sure, you keep on inventing something to cry at
/r/MensRights18/10/16 04:02 AM
10

And everything you said applies, if you ignore the fact that circumcision is just genital mutilation and anyone wanting another person to get their genitals mutilated is absolutely a negative thing
/r/MensRights11/10/16 08:46 PM
1

Having been exiled at birth from the center of life, the Womb, which Woman retains inside herself for the entirety of her life, Man must strive throughout his life in order to return. This reduces Him to a servant of Woman, driven by his testicles. I feel like I don't even need to make a witty comment critiquing this
/r/MensRights06/10/16 02:44 AM
-1

The reason that edit was removed is because it's a stupid ass edit that didn't have a place there. It'd be like me editing Ric Flair's wikipedia page to say that in his personal life he once claimed to have slept with Halle Berry and dozens of other Hollywood celebs causing controversy. It'd get removed because that's not the sort of 'fact' that is relevant to the wiki page.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 02:31 AM
2

Yeah, nah, Trump is actually a misogynistic piece of shit though. Don't care about these girls being triggered, I do care that people are trying to use these girls as a way to defend a blatant sexist pig
/r/MensRights02/10/16 04:23 AM
1

I wouldn't have a platform on men's issues. I'd have a platform on family issues, employment issues, and other issues such as education, economic trade etc. No part of any campaign I run would take such broad societal issues such as parental right and abortion and narrow it down to specific genders competing.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 04:07 AM
1

Not mens rights
/r/MensRights02/10/16 02:47 AM
-5

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=wife+day+care+centre
/r/MensRights02/10/16 01:23 AM
2

Literally google wife day care centre. This ain't a mens rights issue. Any cunt that says this sign or a sign for wife day care centres are a problem are just baiting an argument
/r/MensRights02/10/16 01:22 AM
1

Hmm, a guy who's foreign policy is to increase military input in the Middle East while attempting to force a neighbouring country to pay for USA's own 'desired' infrastructure, or a woman who says stupid things but can't actually do anything about those things because they don't actually exist. Gee, I really can't tell if lying is worse than further intercontinental warfare.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 08:12 PM
7

They're whining about the 2292 men that committed suicide and the perspective that 735 female suicides is worse than 2292 male suicides. What this means is in future your trolling might be more successful if you ridicule the actual point being made in these threads rather than ridiculing points that aren't being made
/r/MensRights28/09/16 07:58 PM
1

The key difference is a sucker punch can come at any angle, a king hit is just a heavy blow from behind. It can easily kill. NZ and Aus are taking quite severe stances on this sort of shit. Often it's unprovoked too
/r/MensRights28/09/16 07:23 PM
-1

I get the feeling you're the type of guy who would literally piss himself in a confrontation and forget all about your concealed piece until you're back at home crying in the shower
/r/MensRights25/09/16 03:01 AM
3

I can't stand doormen. A bunch of pig thick meatheads who just want an excuse to hurt someone I have never meet a bouncer who wants trouble. They're not exactly on top dollar, and drunk idiots can be very dangerous. I'm certain that most bouncers would prefer a quiet night to a night where they are physically assaulted by drunk, disorderly people. That kind of generalized statement is actually pretty stupid, to be honest.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 03:00 AM
6

Woman was imprisoned for having sex with a minor. Hint hint, other female sex offenders, you WILL get punished for this even though you're a woman.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 05:08 AM
12

Not true. In NZ, we almost never reveal the name of a sexual offender until he or she has been found guilty and sentenced. About 9 months ago I posted a story about a female teacher who had sex with an underage boy and was sent to prison for 10 years. Her name was not released until sentencing. In fact, it can be quite a common occurrence for anonymity to stand even after the trial if the judge decides that the offenders identity can link to the victim. Basically, we protect the victims of most …
/r/MensRights13/09/16 05:06 AM
9

the article 'indicates' that this is the first and only time there has ever been an incident between Jovon and a woman, so what controversy are you talking about? Obviously can't exactly be violence or theft, or the coach would have mentioned it when reporting the 'assault' of this woman? Dunno wtf your post was meant to achieve, doing nothing but drop a "well maybe hes not a good guy lol no proof tho"
/r/MensRights10/09/16 06:56 PM
0

Yet she of course gets a free pass under the guise of "lying for the cause." She gets a "free pass" because the guy that was lied about hasn't done anything about it. Why drop such bile and ignorance in your post like that?
/r/MensRights07/09/16 07:49 PM
1

I loved it when the passenger called her pathetic
/r/MensRights05/09/16 08:52 PM
0

"Lets not leave out facts Mate you literally quoted him saying the fact youre asking him not to leave out, the fuck is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights28/08/16 09:01 PM
-16

Except the picture isn't hypocritical. The women in it aren't being hypocrites. The hypocrisy comes from completely uninvolved parties, often sitting behind computer screens, who stick their nose in to cry sexism and slander the opposing gender
/r/MensRights10/08/16 05:05 AM
-11

One person openly allowing another to touch their body isn't nauseating. The attitude that either gender is sexist for portraying this in the media is nauseating, and you're one of the ones doing exactly that.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 05:02 AM
-1

https://www.theguardian.com/law/2014/dec/01/109-women-prosecuted-false-rape-allegations 2 seconds of google search. Now drop the misogyny and use critical thought rather than being a mirrored feminist cunt
/r/MensRights29/07/16 11:24 PM
0

Adding an ignorant opinion doesn't fix fact, it breaks it, now fuck off
/r/MensRights29/07/16 10:28 PM
0

They are
/r/MensRights29/07/16 10:18 PM
5

She called them out on women hitting men and men not being allowed to hit them back - women shouldn't assume they can just hit people and not get hit back
/r/MensRights27/07/16 05:11 AM
1

Thanks. The first article was cancer, just repeated itself
/r/MensRights27/06/16 06:58 PM
3

It's almost as if the judge has based these convictions off not just the facts of the court case, but also the attitude and behaviours of the defendants
/r/MensRights26/06/16 01:58 AM
3

Yep, definitely a her problem. She needs to move into an affordable place. It's completely ignorant of her to think she can keep living in a house you guys were paying for with two incomes.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 05:29 AM
2

She can't afford to what, pay the rent? That sounds like her problem, not yours
/r/MensRights18/06/16 04:37 AM
1

gender dysphoria is a real thing So is body dysmorphia, and the recommended treatment for that is psychological and psychiatric, not surgical. It's actually an exceedingly common occurrence for people to turn to surgical options and then feel a thousand times worse afterwards, because physically changing your body will do nothing to alleviate the psychological issues you have
/r/MensRights08/06/16 05:21 AM
1

Who wants the opposite sex around when you're working on your flabby gut? Who gives a fuck about gender in a gym in the first place? The entire notion of "safe from men" assumes all men are predatory at all times. That's fucked, and it's sexist. I don't go to a gym to perve and harass women. I go to work out without other people openly judging me. And that's exactly what "women-only sessions" is doing when they say "No, you're a guy, you are not allowed inside the gym at these times". It's open …
/r/MensRights07/06/16 11:29 AM
1

I've done assignments on various things I sometimes do, and sometimes don't agree with. From inclusive practice in teaching (which is essentially the ignorance of mental disability wrt student treatment) to developmental theories ranging from Vygotsky to Freud. The key here isn't to just walk in with blinders on, looking for any chance and reason to slander opposing views. You're supposed to look at them objectively, identify weaknesses and strengths, and discuss them in contrast to varying lite…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 10:10 AM
2

They are literally denying access to the entire gym for specific hours of the day based entirely on gender. Women's only classes would be fine. The ladies go into a separate room, do yoga for half an hour, and then they come back out. But that's not what is happening. This would be like a bank suddenly deciding that between the hours of 3pm and 5pm, only women can enter the branch and do their banking. It's insane, backwards, and discriminatory. I mean, the lady in the video said it all. They ne…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 10:00 AM
15

Guaranteed out of court settlement. At the end of the day it'll be easier and cheaper to sling her a few mil then to contest it and risk losing
/r/MensRights31/05/16 12:00 PM
6

Lol token white guy
/r/MensRights09/03/16 08:46 AM
0

The Canyon County Prosecutor's Office said in a statement the plea deal was reached after a discussion with the victims and Skaug. The victims agreed with the plea, which was undoubtedly a decision they did not take lightly. They may have even suggested dropping the sex assault plea in return for something not specified in this news article. Everything here was by the book. Not a mens rights issue.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:07 AM
-9

Yep, and god forbid you challenge a shitpost and point out its not a men's right issue - that's when you see the misogynists come out
/r/MensRights17/02/16 08:16 PM
1

What? I can't hear you over the sound of how right I am, nor the sound of how mad you are
/r/MensRights10/02/16 03:51 AM
5

http://m.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11585958 It goes without saying that the actress will remain anonymous. The law doesn't afford the same privilege to Mr Pearson I love seeing people try to speak with a foot in their mouth. His name and this charge are public record, regardless of the outcome of the trial.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 11:13 PM
2

She's trying to be a "funny woman" rather than "funny". Well, it's not exactly gonna be common or easy for a woman to have the comedic timing of a man when half her jokes are talking about the number of cocks she's sucked recently. There's a bit of a disconnect there for some people
/r/MensRights09/02/16 08:33 AM
17

Should see the post that got me banned from a similar sub. I literally quoted someone who had said that immigrants and refugees 'act out' (read: rape) because Germany is monocultural and intolerant, and I said "as opposed to the multicultural and tolerant society they came from", instant ban with no reason given nor any response when I challenged the ban
/r/MensRights06/02/16 03:06 AM
-8

This was a strawman post and I hope you take a good look at it and realize why I'm not addressing it any further
/r/MensRights02/02/16 09:10 PM
-4

Except no part of what you're "willing to bet" on has anything to do with gender. This is just a person being a cunt irrespective of whether they've got one or not
/r/MensRights02/02/16 09:09 PM
-10

Um, how does have a right to mutual and reciprocal relationships not about mens rights? That's not what the case is about though. It's about a person who murdered their partner. The gender roles here aren't relevant. Remove all mentions of gender in this story and what changes? Nothing. One person murders their disabled partner so that person can be with their lover. There's no infringement on any gender's rights.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 08:52 PM
12

Protect the children
/r/MensRights02/02/16 08:50 PM
1

The Cheswick police chief told Channel 11 News that he’s investigating the issue and will decide her status thereafter. In September, Frame was charged with simple assault. The charge was later withdrawn. She's at worst gonna be disciplined at work.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 10:11 PM
8

He sounded insane. He sounded unstable. He isn't either of those things now though, he's just dead.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 06:17 AM
1

Anyone just needs to look at your post history to see the generalized misogyny you spew in every thread you can. Ignorance befits you, ya misogynistic cunt
/r/MensRights23/01/16 02:27 AM
1

I'm sorry I couldn't discern your point over the tragic amounts of wilful ignorance and deliberate hate you have towards women. Try again without the laughable hate-track playing over in your thick skull
/r/MensRights23/01/16 02:23 AM
0

No, youre the worst kind of person baying for the blood of someone you have not and will not meet. Youre a pathetic piece of shit who hates women, you misogynistic cunt
/r/MensRights22/01/16 10:19 PM
0

Haha get fucked cunt. Take your ignorant shit elsewhere. Gender had nothing to do with it you hateful little pig. Fuck off
/r/MensRights22/01/16 10:18 PM
0

It wasn't used so..
/r/MensRights22/01/16 10:16 PM
-1

Quite possibly. I'm used to reading about aspiring male sports stars who have assault, theft, and domestic assault convictions quashed and/or dismissed so as not to stop them from having a career in sports. Same principle except in the case of this woman, sending her to prison ruins three lives instead of one life
/r/MensRights22/01/16 05:51 PM
-8

The sole reason she didn't go to prison was because she is a solo mother of a five year and the primary carer of an elderly woman. The judge literally said that's the only reason. I'm fine with that, and dont think this is a men's rights issue at all
/r/MensRights22/01/16 04:11 PM
-3

IRL I've seen a guy punch his ex in the face twice cause she made a snarky remark at another girl at the party, in front of their three children. I watched every guy including myself turn away and do nothing. I don't care if a poster is saying men shouldn't hit women. They shouldn't. Women shouldn't hit men either, but that doesn't mean I should have a go at posters aimed at the former issue.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 09:39 PM
5

Because women are more likely to catch STI's thanks to the biological nature of male-female intercourse, and specifically can develop thrush without having sex, and to top it off symptoms of STI's can be much harder to identify with women given the fact they have internal organs which may be affected
/r/MensRights12/01/16 07:20 PM
2

No he won't, evidence does mean something, stop being a hate-filled person.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 09:29 AM
-7

Literally google male reporters in womens locker room and be amazed at how doing ones own research prevents one from putting ones foot in ones own mouth
/r/MensRights11/01/16 07:39 PM
0

It's not a debate when one person is stating fact and the other is making sexist hypocritical comments.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 04:51 PM
-7

Well there's no if about it, male reporters are allowed in women's locker rooms
/r/MensRights11/01/16 04:43 PM
-2

I'll thank you to not make strawman arguments to defend your sexist hypocrisy. I can carry a camera into either gender's locker room. I would only get kicked out of ONE of the two. THAT is sexist. It's a myth that male reporters aren't allowed in female locker rooms. They frequently ARE in female locker rooms, but there are restrictions enforced by the regulatory committees of specific sport boards, generally relating to not taking pictures while they are in there. YOU would be kicked out becaus…
/r/MensRights11/01/16 04:00 PM
3

Congrats on being a hypocritical sexist
/r/MensRights11/01/16 03:21 PM
-5

If they did would it be appropriate for a female athelete to expose herself and ask if that's what the male reporter was looking for?
/r/MensRights11/01/16 03:08 PM
-1

She was in the team changing room when Chris Gayle saw her, deliberately removed his towel exposing his penis, and asked if she was "looking for this?". No part of that is reasonable behaviour between professionals.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 02:46 PM
21

Don't be that guy. Chris Gayle has literally responded to a question about the cricket pitch by saying he hasn't touched the female reporters 'pitch' yet. He immediately starts asking this reporter to meet with him for drinks, ignoring the questions about the game. That is not a compliment. This isn't acceptable, professional behaviour. And he does this frequently. The man has literally exposed himself to a female reporter before. So long as Chris Gayle can freely do this with people like OP sup…
/r/MensRights11/01/16 01:53 PM
-6

It's research on female veteran suicide. It's not "suicide research" that ignores male statistics. In fact, the difference between male and female suicide is widely researched, as is male suicide in general. There is no exclusion based on gender, it's just not focused on trying to appease male rights activists who see gender war in anything. You might as well say you can't run a study on New Zealand suicide because it doesn't include Australia. That's stupid and ignorant. You are literally just …
/r/MensRights10/01/16 03:09 AM
-4

Why single out the greater victim and exclude the lesser? What the fuck is so wrong about someone giving some attention to a lesser victim? It's not the world stopped and no-one is paying any attention to male suicide just cause of this one single study. Jesus fucking christ.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 02:56 AM
-7

So? Being the greater victim does NOT mean other victims can't have support or research or anything like that happen. That's fucking disgusting to say "why write about women" just because men have higher suicide rates. Oh you got your wallet stolen today? Go fuck yourself, someone had their house robbed! How dare anyone give any attention to someone who got pickpocketed! Give 100% attention to house burglaries only! Jesus fucking christ this is such a toxic, pathetic, disgusting mindset. Fucking…
/r/MensRights10/01/16 02:55 AM
6

They absolutely aren't slighting men with this. Unbelievable that there are people taking offense to research into suicide and how to address it.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 02:52 AM
8

Their suicide rate is so high that it approaches that of male veterans, a finding that surprised researchers because men generally are far more likely than women to commit suicide. They know men have higher suicide rates. This is acknowledged. This isn't being ignored. What this is is a specific group of researchers specifically looking at female veteran suicide rates and looking to see why their suicide rates are higher than the rest of the "board". There is nothing wrong with this. It's a good…
/r/MensRights10/01/16 02:51 AM
1

You know basically all awareness campaigns surrounding crime puts the onus on the potential victim to take actions to reduce the chances of being victimized, right? If you don't want to get mugged you need to dress so as not to draw attention, you need to stay away from strangers, you need to move in a group. These are things literally said in guides and articles on how to not be mugged. Change the word mugged to raped and all of a sudden its not legitimate advice, its victim blaming! Utter crap…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 03:41 AM
2

Correlation not causation you uneducated ursine
/r/MensRights08/12/15 08:58 PM
-4

I still fail to see how this woman was spared "on account of being a woman". Thanks for trying, though
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:41 PM
7

It wasn't at once, it's been separated over days/weeks, because each one finds out someone else made an accusation and thinks they can get a settlement if they accuse him too. Just watch - if this ever makes it to court, I guarantee every single one except Stoya will try settle.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:31 PM
8

Farrah Abraham came out and said she was raped? Yeah, nah, the first allegation by Stoya was petty revenge, and everyone else is just a worthless bandwagoner, probably in financial trouble and looking to get a settlement out him.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:29 PM
2

No matter how many times I read that article, I can't find the part where she was spared "on account of being a woman"
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:24 PM
2

You will never admit women have a dark side. You will never drop your clueless generalization act and admit how fucking stupid your mindset really is, you racist ignorant misogynist cunt. You're worse than 90% of the women posted in this sub, you fuckwit
/r/MensRights06/12/15 02:01 AM
1

If you truly don't hate women why are you looking at them with both eyes closed? Clueless cunt
/r/MensRights06/12/15 01:33 AM
1

Un-reality? You mean like spewing misogynistic bullshit and expecting the world to bow at your shithead opinion? Take your fedora off you giant sack of shit
/r/MensRights06/12/15 12:00 AM
1

Fuck off back to your mums basement you pathetic waste of space
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:38 PM
-2

I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the hypocrisy of "HURR DURR MISANDRY WHEN ITS AIMED AT MEN, JUSTICE WHEN ITS AIMED AT WOMEN!"
/r/MensRights03/12/15 10:21 AM
-2

No, if it's just applied to everyone then everyone loses. Get a clue
/r/MensRights03/12/15 06:13 AM
1

That's not a MR attitude. That's just disgusting misogyny.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 11:34 PM
4

because she is being held to the same standard That's not why she is getting 'pissed'. She's not upset that as a woman, she is being asked to pay her male husband alimony. She's upset that as a person, her ex-partner is claiming the entirety of her own personal earnings despite there being a prenup. Gender doesn't factor into it until outside viewers start applying it. This should never be a case of "Hah, the law is being applied to women too!" particularly because it's actually been applied thi…
/r/MensRights02/12/15 09:05 PM
12

That sucks. Highlights how horrid alimony laws are. Absolutely no one in this sub should be saying "muh equality!", because were the genders reversed you'd be screaming bloody murder about how unfair it is. It's not suddenly fair or just or equal now that it's happening to a wealthy woman - these laws are archaic and insulting. I would never try to claim money from a failed marriage - it's her money for christs sake.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 07:51 PM
2

The law. 'Statutory rape' isn't a legal term in NZ, rather, the laws around that are referred to as 'sexual conduct with a child under 12/young person under 16'. 'Unlawful Sexual Connection' carries a greater penalty than sexual conduct with a child, which is why she was charged with that instead.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 12:13 AM
7

By legal definition it wasn't rape, but because by moral definitions it was rape, her gender was not a factor in the judge's decision and sentencing
/r/MensRights27/11/15 06:08 AM
71

Justice Mark Woolford equated some of Reriti's offending with rape. He said the charge of unlawful sexual connection carried a penalty of up to 20 years' imprisonment. "Because a woman cannot be charged with rape" these incidents all resulted in charges of unlawful sexual connection, the judge said. The judge knew the woman couldn't be found guilty of rape as per the NZ definition, but he effectively called it rape anyway and sentenced her to ten years and six months under the charge of unlawful…
/r/MensRights27/11/15 12:14 AM
2

authorities say she had a relationship with an 11-year-old student. Send a message to the local police department, because they're the ones who called it a relationship.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 08:33 AM
1

I would think it's her profession that relates to the name suppression, as revealing her name and her job puts her victim at risk of losing his privacy. I think the last few cases of male child molesters who were working in schools weren't named until after trial unless there were extenuating circumstances (one tried to flee the country).
/r/MensRights12/11/15 07:02 PM
0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_violence Domestic violence (also domestic abuse, spousal abuse, intimate partner violence, battering or family violence) is a pattern of behavior which involves violence or other abuse by one person against another in a domestic setting, such as in marriage or cohabitation. We see them get suspended and prosecuted because there's underlying behavioural patterns determined by the prosecution. Dunno what you really expect to achieve by arguing against the def…
/r/MensRights12/11/15 02:37 AM
0

Pretty sure she explains that domestic violence is legally about a pattern of abuse, not a one off instance. In this case, Ronda didn't commit domestic violence. She committed an assault, unless it can be proven that a pattern of abuse exists.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 07:57 PM
0

"Physical violence and sexual violence are closely linked for women" I think this was supposed to be the point. Not that men can't fear being attacked, but that their fear isn't also tied to sexual assault, date rape drugs etc.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 07:55 PM
4

I swear, the movie felt weird when Gibson showed up because he had an actual character as opposed to the 14 other cardboard generic badasses.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 10:41 AM
2

Next time a SJW says this, call it prejudiced instead
/r/MensRights14/10/15 05:54 PM
4

"Look, nobody is worth the money that Robert Downey Jr. is worth. But if I told you the disparity, you would probably be surprised." "Your salary is a way to quantify what you're worth. If men are being paid a lot more for doing the same thing, it feels s***ty." Intentional omission of quotes confirming the title is intentional
/r/MensRights07/10/15 08:43 AM
7

"Look, nobody is worth the money that Robert Downey Jr. is worth. But if I told you the disparity, you would probably be surprised." She's essentially saying it bothers her that there is a gap between hers and RDJ's salary. If that's not thinking she deserves the same money as him, I dunno what is
/r/MensRights07/10/15 08:42 AM
47

It's like she doesn't realize Tony Stark is the main character in most of the films he's in, and one of the main characters in the others. Whereas Pepper Potts is a supporting character in every movie she's in. I mean.. They are two very different roles. I'm pretty sure Robert Downey Jr got paid more than Don Cheadle in Iron Man 2, right? Cause he had a supporting role, not the main role...
/r/MensRights07/10/15 07:48 AM
5

Take a drug test in front of someone who isn't family and have them sign an affidavit confirming you passed, and then have your lawyer affirm it in court, if you have one.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 02:06 AM
1

I've had a number of mates who grew their hair out quite long, and have occasionally had it cut. They were always charged more than the standard cut if they were shortening their hair to say a number 2 from shoulder length or longer hair. Likewise, I went to uni with a lady who preferred short hair and was only ever charged the standard men's cut when she got her trim. Isn't this the standard it's done by? Length of the cut, the type of cut being done etc? The gender thing is just based on the f…
/r/MensRights06/09/15 09:48 AM
2

I was pressured by all of my exgirlfriends into not using condoms when I still wanted to. One literally cried when I refused and put one on saying "it doesn't feel right".
/r/MensRights06/09/15 09:40 AM
1

Good for you. Unfortunately for you, you don't have the right to dictate who does and does not reply to comments you post in threads. Also, I'm not breaking any of this subreddit's rules. I'm giving my opinion that you're an ignorant wanker, which is allowed AFAIK. Get over it, and yourself, and kindly fuck off.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 05:39 AM
0

You're a fuckwit, stop replying if ya don't like it
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:45 AM
-1

Please never post from ignorance and then refuse to accept that ignorance again. And refrain from saying you're leaving only to keep replying and deleting your comments. Congrats on being more hate-filled than most feminists. Catcha later, cunt 😘
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:20 AM
1

No you didn't or you wouldn't have made either of your ignorant comments. You're a liar, and you knee-jerk reacted in hate to a thread title. Anyone who watched the video would never call Karen Straughan a feminist. Take care, good luck, and actually read/watch things before commenting on them.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:14 AM
1

Try watching the video. Karen Straughan is one of the most active Mens Rights Activists I know of. She's as far from sexist as can be and she has frequenty stated that she is NOT a feminist. Knee-jerk reacting to thread titles is not a good idea. In fact in this very video she absolutely tears a feminist apart during the Q&A. Karen Straughan is most definitely not sexist and hate-filled, and is 100% not a feminist. She is 100% an MRA.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:10 AM
1

Did you just call Karen Straughan sexist and hate-filled?
/r/MensRights23/06/15 08:14 AM
6

I'm with you. In this article there is nothing that ostracizes, demonizes, or minimalizes men and mens rights, yet this thread is blowing up like crazy. This article is just about raising awareness to the growing numbers of teenage female suicide. I don't know why this is being construed as an attack on men and mens rights.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 08:23 PM
2

Probably ignored any votes that were not made with their university email attached to it
/r/MensRights27/05/15 08:46 PM
1

I'm certain the supreme court will throw out any case where a male tries to use this against a judge
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:35 PM
2

I'm certain most judges will throw out any case where a male tries to use this against a female
/r/MensRights26/05/15 08:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter