| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | What is the bare minimum a guy needs to have casual sex/a girlfriend in your part of the world?Over 2 years at gym, impeccable job experience and exciting career prospects, social confirmation of multiple friends, no mental issues whatsoever if you have a sub-8 looks, minimum 5+ looks, over 5'9''. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/02/18 03:01 PM |
| 10 | Men rarely catcall me any more.Holy shit, how is this even remotely acceptable. You can literally vomit out anything as long as it paints males as the demon figure and females as the victim. We need a purge. | /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen | 25/02/18 02:27 PM |
| 1 | The Femitheist: The woman who believes that reducing the male population by 90% would bring about true equality and solve most of the worlds problems.This femoid thinks she's radical by proposing an obviously unrealistic utopia. Should be laughed out of existence. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/02/18 01:54 PM |
| 2 | Why do smarter people have fewer or no babies?Just being in college doesn't make anyone smart. It's possible they're from the lower end of the IQ spectrum at least among college students. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/02/18 01:41 AM |
| 4 | Why do smarter people have fewer or no babies?They have more to do with their brains so they do not need to fill the void with tending to crying brats. They also have more achievements so being a turboparent is not needed for their self-confidence. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/02/18 12:46 AM |
| 2 | In light of the #metoo movement, are poor and downtrodden women who get into relationships with rich men really consenting?Capitalim is progression away from the unfiltered brute female hypergamy in the sense that it afforded money and status to be wielded as tools to gain access to females, instead of the pure dominating power of genetics that reigned before. Obviously that arrangement is not equal, but neither is the relation of the average male to an average female under hypergamy, so I'm certainly not going to feel bad at all for this type of exploitative relations with poor females and rich males. Plus, #metoo … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/02/18 11:39 PM |
| 5 | [Shower thought] If we had to select a group of 100 people to populate a new planet, the optimal distribution would be 20 men and 80 women, not 50/50there can be more babies being conceived Which would ruin the ratio eventually, if the randomness of genetic recombination wouldn't already manage to do a good job of it. Also: drunk ENTP cringe | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/02/18 11:05 PM |
| 22 | "Where are all the rich men?"Yet it's only males that are accused of thinking about human relations in a transactional way, while materialistic females have reality TV shows dedicated to them. | /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen | 24/02/18 08:20 PM |
| -2 | Is casual bodybuilding and steroid use a direct result of unrestricted female hypergamy? I say yes.Of course. Meanwhile any sub-8 male will accept a female that doesn't go the gym. Not so for males. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/02/18 11:17 PM |
| 1 | QForMen: What kind of man would you want your daughter to date?A rotating collective of incels, excluding all Chads. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/02/18 11:12 PM |
| 1 | If men are more individualistic, stoic and emotionally repressed, then how did patriarchy emerge in the first place?You won't maintain it, you won't have the power linked to it. You'll just profit from it and likely this will not continue on your own offspring. Yes, you will. There have been dynasties that have continued that wealth, and regardless, it gives you access to a greater amount of wealth from others. What's your point. Humans don't have different human nature depending on their view on X or Y. There is no one objective human nature, humans behave differently in different circumstances. Saying that … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/02/18 11:36 AM |
| 1 | If men are more individualistic, stoic and emotionally repressed, then how did patriarchy emerge in the first place?Isn't feudalism about birth rights? And therefore not about privilege by merit at all? Again, you can inherit huge amounts of wealth under current society, making it not meritocratic. Compare the fates of an Angolan child worker and the child of Bill Gates, for example. Hardly "meritocratic". Individualism and ambition is within human nature But you just said in your original comment that men are favored because they are individualistic, which you use as synonymous to self-interested. Do you thi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/02/18 11:24 AM |
| 1 | If men are more individualistic, stoic and emotionally repressed, then how did patriarchy emerge in the first place?No, we know all about the systems which are not in practice today. Like, we know there were hunter-gatherers, we know there was feudalism. All of which could be described as meritocracy and individualist since everything is meritocratic and individualist. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/02/18 11:10 AM |
| 1 | The Problem with “No Means No” is that it is ALWAYS negotiable.But people don't necessarily know they're autistic. Should they be required to tell it so people could react appropriately? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/02/18 11:07 AM |
| 2 | If men are more individualistic, stoic and emotionally repressed, then how did patriarchy emerge in the first place?Your term usage of individualist and meritocracy is so wide as to be useless. Every society ever is an individualist meritocracy according to you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/02/18 10:58 AM |
| 2 | If men are more individualistic, stoic and emotionally repressed, then how did patriarchy emerge in the first place?You were arguing about individualism though. By that definition literally every society ever is meritocratic. Or maybe not, if inheritance can not be thought of as acquisition but who knows if individualism can also mean collective self-interested submission. Such a useful term. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/02/18 10:55 AM |
| 5 | If men are more individualistic, stoic and emotionally repressed, then how did patriarchy emerge in the first place?That amounts to such a wide definition of individualism that it is meaningless. It would be self-interested, for example, to follow leader's orders in an authoritarian regime. In your view, that would be an individualistic society because the people following orders are pursuin the self-interest to survive in the society. Of course, this mostly shows that the whole concept of meritocracy is mostly a useless abstraction. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/02/18 10:45 AM |
| 2 | If men are more individualistic, stoic and emotionally repressed, then how did patriarchy emerge in the first place?How are individualistic individuals more likely to succeed in a society where networking and social relations are paramount? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/02/18 10:35 AM |
| 1 | The Problem with “No Means No” is that it is ALWAYS negotiable.Would you say that it would be good to discourage autistic persons from approaching women from this perspective? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/02/18 10:32 AM |
| 1 | I really don't like deadbeat dadsMaybe for cucks with slave mentality, yes. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/02/18 04:20 PM |
| 1 | I really don't like deadbeat dadsI mean, you're still acting like a lapdog for pussy. Nothing has changed. You should realize that women are worth for nothing in relationships, only as prostitutes and sex objects. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/02/18 01:10 PM |
| 1 | I really don't like deadbeat dadsI don't think everyone who stops being 24/7 in a child's life after a marriage is bad. There are a lot of tricks females use to try to trap males into fatherhood: poking holes into condoms, not taking their birth control pills etc. My first instinct is to feel sympathy for the victim of the gynocracy here. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/02/18 01:03 PM |
| 1 | I really don't like deadbeat dadsWhy is he a shitty person though? Do you think having a child should mean that they have to be together forever? In the OP's case, I assume theyre still paying child support and also seeing them once a month. In this scenario, the only drawback would be that there is one, rather than two, parents. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/02/18 12:54 PM |
| 1 | I really don't like deadbeat dadsWhat is so inherently bad about a father being in the lives of his children? Nothing, I already said that I don't have a problem with this. You, on the other hand, seem to have a problem with a single parent arrangement. Why? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/02/18 12:39 PM |
| 1 | I really don't like deadbeat dadsWhy does the number of parents have to be two though, then? Why isn't two inadequate, and three the only correct number? What is so inherently bad about single motherhood, compared to the number of two parents? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/02/18 12:31 PM |
| 0 | I really don't like deadbeat dadsDepends on how old these children are, I really don't think it does matter if they're below, say, 8. From another perspective, if you think single motherhood is inherently bad, you must think that lesbian child rearing is also inherently bad, making you homophobic. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/02/18 12:27 PM |
| 0 | I really don't like deadbeat dadsI did not say there is anything wrong with it. Truthfully speaking, really there is a lot of things wrong with it in the context of our current sexual dynamic, but that had nothing to do with what I said. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/02/18 12:18 PM |
| 6 | I really don't like deadbeat dadsRedPiller triggered that people expose them, those power fantasies must feel suddenly so fragile. I ruined my "best friends" relationship by telling his gf about him cheating, it was hilarious. The guy was reduced from this bragging alpha stud to a depressed alcoholic wreck, the same is bound to happen to you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/02/18 12:08 PM |
| 1 | I really don't like deadbeat dadsWhy don't you like them? It's not like the single mum couldn't easily get a substitute beta to provide a father figure for them. Also, do you mean to imply that you disapprove of two women raising children, if a father figure is so necessary? Of course, there is the possibility that you just feel stupid for being such a "good" man, while those men get much more pleasure byt shitting on everything you value. In this case, you shouldn't be so obvious about it, because all your disapproval amounts … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/02/18 12:05 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter