TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

le-doppelganger Archive

View 9 posts and 131 comments by le-doppelganger on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Are you suggesting there are no movies where men beat women? No one said or implied this. I can name at least 3 just last year, not a 20 year old movie. Which three? Were they all comedies like "This Christmas"? Were the beatings portrayed in a comic manner, whereby we—the audience—are supposed to be on the man's side, cheering him on as they beat the women? Because if not they aren't comparable. There was even a movie last year which was about women who are raped but then fight the legal system…
/r/MensRights07/04/26 03:26 PM
2

but they aren't more likely to be raped and sexually assaulted like women do. They're far more likely to be murdered than women, however. 81%* more likely, in fact. *UNODC Global Study on Homicide 2023
/r/MensRights27/03/26 11:25 PM
5

I think men’s groups realize feminism and women aren’t the same thing. They realize much of the discrimination men face is a result of politicians pandering to feminist lobbying efforts, Christ having nothing to do with it. I agree. In my experience that is more commonly something we're accused of when criticising feminism or feminists.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 04:18 AM
9

This was a genuine awareness campaign on American university campuses. Then there's the fact that in many places rape is defined by penetration whereby the onus is placed on the man in the situation, intoxicated, sober, or anything else, and female offenders—if reported and convicted at all—receive lesser charges and are not categorised as rapists.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 09:46 PM
4

In Spain there is practically zero incentive for people, girls and women in particular, not to identify as feminists. Feminism is particularly virulent and mainstream there.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 04:37 AM
2

Interestingly, Texas is one of the US states in which rape law—categorised as Sexual Assault or Aggravated Sexual Assault there—is actually gender neutral in its legal description. At least that's my reading of it, I'll admit I don't always fully understand the technicalities of the jargon.
/r/MensRights31/01/26 06:03 PM
12

My feelings too. We know there is a clear, not to mention rather large, gendered gap in the justice system that favours female criminals by a considerable margin in many (possibly most) countries, which results in a decidedly lopsided overview of crime data. And that is in addition to the other things you mention such as domestic abuse statistics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/25 12:46 AM
13

The day you raise your hand to a man, that's the day you officially get treated like a man
/r/MensRights09/12/25 07:24 PM
3

Well, we're already in a time where women abusing their kids and husbands is apparently okay . . .
/r/MensRights09/12/25 07:18 PM
10

I love (hate) that this article starts by listing arbitrary characteristics - “He is, after all, a wealthy, healthy, white, heterosexual, shaven-headed, 61-year-old Californian….” - as if that has ANY bearing what so ever?! Well, it is The Guardian. Speaking of which, Archive such links, all; don't give rags like this clicks, u/RealStarkey—not to mention it's useful in case they stealth edit an article.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 07:09 PM
15

The guy who proposed plans to tax "richer and whiter" neighbourhoods? Singling out race in such a way seems like identity politics to me, especially in the current sociopolitical climate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 06:20 PM
21

“The Fraud of Feminism” written in 1930, documents how even then feminism sought advantages for women such as lighter prison sentencing. 1913. And the author also wrote another, similar tome even earlier: "The Legal Subjection of Men" in 1908.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 06:01 PM
11

The bank account claim is untrue, anyway: Bank of England Museum Women were among the earliest investors at the Bank of England in 1694, and this continued throughout the Bank’s history. Women also held private accounts at the Bank. This pass book for Evelyn Wood is a record of the transactions on her Bank of England account between 1906 and 1909. The Bankers Monthly, October 1920 Women are rapidly becoming accustomed to their new freedom. One of the evidences of the broadening of their interest…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/25 03:52 PM
5

Seeing misandrists on Tik Tok does not equate to "feminism is not for equality". Okay, and the myriad of feminist organisations, groups, activists, and figureheads who also espouse and enact misandry, like the ones catalogued here for example?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/25 01:40 AM
1

Evidently not. The pass book of Evelyn Wood as pictured in the first source quite clearly has the name MISS EVELYN A. L. WOOD on its cover i.e. not MRS. If the woman used in this example was a widow i.e. the reason she had the account was because of her late husband's "permission" she'd most likely still be credited with her married title in that era, and not renamed to "Miss." Furthermore, how did single women manage their finances back then if they didn't have a husband to "permit" them their …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/25 12:13 AM
23

Such claims are, in a word, untrue: Bank of England Museum Women were among the earliest investors at the Bank of England in 1694, and this continued throughout the Bank’s history. Women also held private accounts at the Bank. This pass book for Evelyn Wood is a record of the transactions on her Bank of England account between 1906 and 1909. The Bankers Monthly, October 1920 Women are rapidly becoming accustomed to their new freedom. One of the evidences of the broadening of their interests is p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/25 08:47 PM
1

There are studies directly contradicting such claims. I believe there are more than just that one, but from a brief sub search this was the first one that came up.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 12:19 AM
13

There was a perfectly fine, non-gendered word for this already: patronising. Or condescending. And I highly doubt that even in her era women didn't do the equivalent to men.
/r/MensRights15/09/25 02:06 AM
1

Any first wave feminists alive today would be well over a hundred years old. And the second wave is the one that birthed all the radicals like Andrea Dworkin, Sally Miller Gearhart, Mary Daly, and Valeria Solanas.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 09:44 PM
10

"Currently, male victims of domestic abuse, rape, stalking and so-called honour-based violence are grouped in the same category as female victims."
/r/MensRights11/09/25 09:37 PM
7

Anti-feminism does not = misogyny, and misogyny does not = anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights26/08/25 06:20 PM
16

I had this research handy from the last time I posted on Reddit, which I think paints a relevant picture: In the past year FBI data shows that 10,929 men were convicted for homicide in the United States, so 71%. As you can see from the graph, that is the majority by a considerable margin. However out of an estimated American male population of 168.35 million that makes... 0.00649%. Quite literally less than 1% of American men. And that's not even taking into account the proven gendered gap in th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/25 06:10 PM
1

That framework is still totally exclusionary, as is the rape law. You realise that regardless of both crimes having the same maximum sentencing it means that even if a woman is charged with said crime she will not be counted as a rapist and will therefore not be included in any statistical counts of such criminals? One of the main reasons stopping them from pursuing a prosecution is the legal definition of rape. Prior to 1994, UK law asserted that rape could only be committed by a man against a …
/r/MensRights22/08/25 12:18 AM
5

A small minority of men. In the past year FBI data shows that 10,929 men were convicted for homicide in the United States. Out of an estimated American male population of 168.35 million that makes 0.00649%. You're generalising "men" based on less than 1% of them. And I didn't mention it because it's irrelevant—we're talking about victims, not perpetrators. This is exactly the same line of argument racists use to handwave away black-on-black crime.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 06:13 PM
6

the UK has adapted a more nuanced approach to domestic violence such as the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 which uses gender neutral terms while defining abuse and acknowledges that victims can be of any gender. It is also in the UK that "male victims of domestic abuse, rape, stalking and so-called honour-based violence are grouped in the same category as female victims." Not to mention rape laws there are very specifically gendered and therefore biased, but we're talking about DV here primarily. Men a…
/r/MensRights20/08/25 05:34 PM
6

And 81% less likely to be killed than a man. Personally, I don't like to generalise entire genders but men aren't the ones lapping up mass media fear mongering without introspection or examination of the available evidence—despite being objectively far more likely to be victims of murder and violent crime than women—so . . .
/r/MensRights20/08/25 05:13 PM
8

Bank of England Museum Women were among the earliest investors at the Bank of England in 1694, and this continued throughout the Bank’s history. Women also held private accounts at the Bank. This pass book for Evelyn Wood is a record of the transactions on her Bank of England account between 1906 and 1909. The Bankers Monthly, October 1920 Women are rapidly becoming accustomed to their new freedom. One of the evidences of the broadening of their interests is particularly noticed in the banking w…
/r/MensRights20/08/25 05:00 PM
16

Women have always worked, long before the Suffragettes existed. For most girls, becoming a blacksmith was probably not a dream. Husband, family, home: those were the pursuits of a young woman of the eighteenth century. Finding a woman or women working at all outside the home, much less in a male-dominated trade, most likely meant the dream wasn't shaping up the way they'd hoped. Some women worked because they had no choice. Though there was no system of standards governing the trades in the colo…
/r/MensRights20/08/25 04:45 PM
3

From what I've seen any and all official articles covering this from these types of sources engage in this sort of 'double speak', even under the pretense of raising awareness. This article is covering numbers from studies and surveys, not criminal statistics, so legal terminology shouldn't really be a factor here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/25 05:03 PM
2

In the United States women are treated more leniently through the judicial process which averages at over 60% compared to men: 'Estimating Gender Disparities in Federal Criminal Cases' This paper assesses gender disparities in federal criminal cases. It finds large gender gaps favoring women throughout the sentence length distribution (averaging over 60%), conditional on arrest offense, criminal history, and other pre-charge observables. Female arrestees are also significantly likelier to avoid …
/r/MensRights31/07/25 08:03 PM
2

Seeing "GB" made my mind go to Great Britain; that was my mistake. I'm unaware of such recategorizing in the US (or should that be intentional misclassification?) This document from Stop Abusive & Violent Environments details how VAWA and other such stratagems are discriminatory to male victims of violence, but that's not exactly addressing the initial claim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/25 06:59 PM
7

Here you go.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/25 02:30 PM
7

Citation needed.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 02:16 PM
12

On stage, in front of an audience, on television? You'd think that would have been plastered all over the media by now . . .
/r/EverydayMisandry25/07/25 05:25 PM
12

There are no "men's rights" organisations backed by governmental funding such as the UN Women, or NPOs like the Feminist Majority Foundation, National Organisation for Women, and the Global Fund for Women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 04:50 AM
31

however given all the horrible things that happen to women daily caused by men, I know I'd probably feel similar if it was men who were getting assaulted and raped daily. Men are assaulted and raped at very similar numbers when one looks beyond the various gendered biases found in the law throughout the world: For many feminists, questioning claims of rampant sexual violence in our society amounts to misogynist "rape denial." However, if the CDC figures are to be taken at face value, then we mus…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 04:33 AM
0

Both occurred in different states. In the US each state has its own variations of rape and sexual assault laws which use different terminology and definitions. Texas, where this one happened does not have a "rape" law but considers it a form of "sexual assault", and if the victim is a minor it would be "sexual assault against a child." In this case, however, the article describes her crimes as such: In the interview, the 13-year-old described two incidents where Sorrells touched him inappropriat…
/r/MensRights29/06/25 07:50 PM
8

If some dude did this to your wife or mom or sister or daughter during a fucking medical exam what would you have them do? What would you do? Report him to the appropriate authorities. If Hathaway's character had lied about being a medical resident so she could watch Gyllenhaal's character having his penis examined you're saying he would be justified in confronting her about it by punching her in the face? This sub is so fantastic it really helps me keep a realistic perspective on what men truly…
/r/MensRights20/06/25 03:39 PM
5

I hate to break it to you but it was never actually about equality. Even before the suffragettes' acts of domestic terrorism it was founded on a basis of untruths stating that throughout history men and women operated as an oppressor/oppressed class with basically no nuance, as per the Declaration of Sentiments (1848)—generally regarded as the 'official' beginning of feminism as a recognised movement: "The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpation on the part of man tow…
/r/MensRights20/06/25 01:50 PM
3

Bit of a faulty comparison. The Taliban aren't specifically anti-feminist, they're anti-human rights, period. Being opposed to the feminist ideology and movement is not remotely comparable, because feminism is not equivalent to the concept of women having rights, and was never actually about achieving gender equality despite their claims to the contrary.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 01:22 PM
64

Ironically, she did herself.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/25 11:05 PM
65

"You know why? Because girls are nice." "Mean Girls" was literally based on a non-fiction book.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/25 10:59 PM
20

Emmett Till is fair game for them because they can, and do, pin it on the racial factor. Undeniably that played a huge part in it, especially at that time, but it allows them to skim over the other aspect of it: woman falsely accuses man, man is punished on the basis of no evidence.
/r/MensRights08/04/25 11:06 PM
3

Do you have a case example of this? Edit: Downvoting this is dumb. It's good to have actual evidence for these things as opposed to unprovable anecdotes and hypotheticals—that's feminist territory. Edit: And now we have some examples to work with.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 04:14 PM
60

It's interesting that this doesn't get talked about often: women have a disproportionately large influence in children's lives, both girls and boys, from the moment they're born and at the ages when their brains are most absorbent: midwives, obstetricians, family nurses, babysitters, nannies, child minders, au pairs, kindergarten/nursery teachers/workers, elementary/primary/grade school teachers, and high/secondary school teachers are all majorly female, not to mention there are more single moth…
/r/MensRights03/04/25 04:09 PM
11

why am i watching a youtube video about feminism. Because you might learn something from a woman who knows what she's talking about, and based on your initial post and comments throughout this thread you don't seem to have an accurate grasp of what feminism actually is and does.
/r/MensRights26/03/25 04:53 AM
6

? do you not know what feminism is? Do you?
/r/MensRights26/03/25 04:05 AM
7

In fairness, that's slightly a more relevant topic for that film as there is a lot of prosthetics work in it throughout relating to the body deformity horror, and it's tied to the overall plot and theme of it. The same cannot be said for "The White Lotus."
/r/MensRights17/03/25 10:30 PM
11

A lot of the time actresses wear merkins when doing "full frontal" nudity, as well, so technically you're not actually seeing anything. It's truly insane how the "Male Gaze" theory has pervaded the discourse to such a degree. Male nudity in film and television isn't remotely rare, nor is it a new phenomenon either. I think a lot of people have been effectively conditioned not to notice it half the time, or rather deemed it not to count in the same way.
/r/MensRights17/03/25 10:27 PM
14

Also, people don't discus and question female actresses genitalia? What planet is he living on? Well, do you have any examples of such?
/r/MensRights17/03/25 10:22 PM
3

The truth isn't productive discourse?
/r/MensRights04/03/25 10:33 PM
3

"What does this have to do with Feminism" - are we wanting to solve the problem? Yes? Well in solving a problem you need to align with groups who would support such policies. All I said was "even feminists would support this" - meaning it shouldn't be hard to find allies. Various groups and individuals like Eric Clopper have been raising awareness about and protesting against it for years, now, so where has the support been during that time? What's been stopping them? Aside from solely focussing…
/r/MensRights04/03/25 10:28 PM
11

In fairness, it shouldn't be glorified for either gender. But there is a definite double standard present.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 01:17 AM
27

It's interesting that this doesn't get talked about often: women have a disproportionately large influence in children's lives, both girls and boys, from the moment they're born and at the ages when their brains are most absorbent: midwives, obstetricians, family nurses, babysitters, nannies, child minders, au pairs, kindergarten/nursery teachers/workers, elementary/primary/grade school teachers, and high/secondary school teachers are all majorly female, not to mention there are more single moth…
/r/MensRights07/02/25 01:02 AM
8

My suspicions that you weren't worth conversing with have been confirmed. I won't be answering any of your reductive questions when you can't be bothered to form an argument beyond one of exclusion.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 04:25 PM
10

Of course men don't want to send women to prison, otherwise they might actually have to look after their own kids A system that benefits women over men is not a "patriarchy", and frankly this is a rather pathetic strawman retort. That is a problem, but it is also one stemming from patriarchy, as men are supposed to be strong and women weak. So when noted feminist authority figures such as Dr. Mary Koss, whose work has been cited by Congress, the FBI, the WHO, and the CDC—as per her CV—and who ho…
/r/MensRights22/01/25 04:04 PM
15

"Patriarchy" is when women receive more lenient treatment in the criminal justice system by a degree of over 60%. Men will rape women and get away with it for years or literally their entire lives. And women who rape men are rarely even counted as such, period, let alone getting away with it . . . largely due to biases in the so-called "patriarchal" justice system. Even if women try to prosecute, there was such a strong historical trend for not believing women that we had to have a whole movemen…
/r/MensRights22/01/25 02:54 PM
1

Not that rare.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 09:52 PM
37

I was going to say that myself, even Mens Lib isn't good enough: a sub that is full of kowtowing and self-loathing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/25 08:45 PM
8

Again, I agree. And I did find the clip I was talking about: it was on Chris Williamson's podcast.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/24 12:50 AM
7

Yes. Kilt-wearing barmen have ditched the tartan because they are fed up of being sexually harassed by rowdy women. They now wear trousers at the Hootananny pub, in Inverness, after one too many attempts to see what they wore underneath. Iain Howie, the pub's assistant manager, said the incidents mostly happened at weekends when the bar was particularly busy. Staff became fed up with groups of female revellers lifting up their kilts to check whether or not they are "true Scotsmen". Kit Fraser, t…
/r/EverydayMisandry31/12/24 12:24 AM
16

He's a bit too soft on feminists and women in my experience. I agree however I do think that might be changing somewhat, albeit slowly. He did some podcast interviews recently and I'm sure he expressed annoyance at the constant need to mention women's issues first alongside men's, as a sort of buffer to avoid being accused of misogyny or some such bigotry for daring to even mention the idea of men even having issues. It's possible seeing the constant comments on the Instagram posts as you mentio…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/24 11:43 PM
4

You know women have a disproportionately large influence in children's lives, both girls and boys, from the moment they're born and at the ages when they're brains are most absorbent, right? Midwives, obstetricians, family nurses, babysitters, nannies, child minders, au pairs, kindergarten/nursery teachers/workers, elementary/primary/grade school teachers, and high/secondary school teachers are all majorly female, not to mention there are more single mother families than single father ones.
/r/MensRights10/12/24 02:12 PM
3

Which is why I said: in addition to those who follow their lead because said narrative is the prevailing one.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 04:47 PM
6

It's not just on the internet. The anti-male rhetoric permeates far beyond it and has tangible, real world influence.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 08:58 PM
28

Mainstream, authoritative sources have debunked the "gap" numerous times - the issue is that feminist groups and orgs continue to ignore it in order to push their narratives, in addition to those who follow their lead because said narrative is the prevailing one. They are habitual liars. Examples: Time - '6 Feminist Myths That Will Not Die' American Enterprise Institute - 'There Really Is No 'gender Wage Gap.' There’s a 'gender Earnings Gap' but 'paying Women Well' Won’t Close That Gap' Forbes -…
/r/MensRights22/11/24 07:01 PM
9

Do you have any credible sources or evidence to support your claims? Without that, your argument is ultimately based more on opinion rather than factual refutation, especially when compared to the sourced list and links provided. Not to mention the OP is far from complete, for example feminist groups also blocked gender neutral rape laws in Nepal and Israel, and in the United States the National Organization for Women (NOW), which defines itself as "the largest organization of feminist grassroot…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/24 10:39 PM
14

You think that’s an inflated ratio? Where are you finding the correct information? 'The Campus Rape Myth' by Heather MacDonald. The campus rape industry's central tenet is that one-quarter of all college girls will be raped or be the targets of attempted rape by the end of their college years (completed rapes outnumbering attempted rapes by a ratio of about three to two). The girls' assailants are not terrifying strangers grabbing them in dark alleys but the guys sitting next to them in class or…
/r/MensRights18/11/24 10:24 PM
9

I used to pay for subscription, but this was one of the reasons I cancelled it last year. It took you that long?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/24 09:13 PM
8

These articles were both written in 2014, and there are several other sources on the subject. We know the proof.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:43 PM
9

Not surprising in the least.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:36 PM
14

Who, in your view, are the "extreme feminists" who "get far too much credit in this sub"?
/r/MensRights03/11/24 10:06 PM
3

Found on Twitter/X. I know these aren't actually "entertainment" media sources, but there's no flair for news/journalism outlet media.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/10/24 03:13 PM
23

Yes. "Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat."
/r/MensRights25/10/24 06:06 PM
7

Men are statistically more likely to be victims of violent crime by random assailants, so unless someone she knows happens to roll by and assault her, this scenario is more unsafe for a man. She's using her alleged prior experiences to be a misandrist.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/10/24 06:51 PM
8

Not OP, but I'm assuming they're pointing out that in several countries male homosexuality, specifically, is a criminal offence. Gay men are often singled out more so when it comes to these kinds of discriminatory practices. From this source, out of 67 countries listed "38 countries criminalize same-sex conduct regardless of sex" and apparently only "10 countries have, since 1986, explicitly enacted laws that criminalize sex between women as well as men."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/24 06:36 PM
8

No one can prove this is a rule, that's my whole point. People can claim it over and over again, but that does not make it true. Except it is true. There is a proven gendered sentencing gap that favours female criminals by a large margin throughout the entire criminal justice procedure, and plenty of evidence that female sex predators are severely underreported, undercounted, and under-punished, partly due to biased laws present in several countries including the US and the UK: 'Men or Women - W…
/r/MensRights16/10/24 12:56 AM
10

The UN has a history of stuff like this—and worse. Highlighting and criticising discrimination from a major organisation like them as it comes is important.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 06:30 PM
15

Or "reverse sexism." Always has to be that caveat to make it a lesser issue.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 06:22 PM
5

In my comment I said: It is a commonly held (and bragged about) belief that girls, on average, mature faster than boys. except if it's true that girls do in fact mature faster The general narrative, not to mention the law, certainly doesn't see it that way, and so your reversal doesn't really work—"im skeptical of what harm a 17 year old boy having sex with a 25 year old woman can do" is what people already think. Note the use of "belief" and "if"—I didn't state anything as fact, or even that it…
/r/MensRights21/09/24 03:30 PM
22

In most places rape is defined by penetration. This case occurred in the US, where the general definition of rape is as follows: The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim. In the United Kingdom, as an additional example, the law is quite specifically gendered: The legal definition of rape is when a person intentionally penetrates another's vagina, anus or mouth…
/r/MensRights21/09/24 02:25 AM
8

17 year olds do not have fucking total agency in a relationship with a fully developed grown man oh my god youre not real Nowhere in my comment did I say this. and no, thats not a what a double standard is at all??? You don't think it's a double standard that cases of statutory rape are thought to be worse for girls than boys? You don't think it's a double standard that a lot of the time when the victim is a boy it isn't even considered rape in the eyes of the law?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 02:12 AM
14

It is a commonly held (and bragged about) belief that girls, on average, mature faster than boys. This belief goes out the window in cases such as these, whereas the severity and potential consequences for the victim are uniformly taken to be far less for boys than girls, except if it's true that girls do in fact mature faster, shouldn't they be technically more equipped to handle sexual relationships than boys? The general narrative, not to mention the law, certainly doesn't see it that way, an…
/r/MensRights21/09/24 02:02 AM
1

Interesting that coverage of earlier studies revealed different, more equal numbers . . . How could that be? After all, very few men in the CDC study were classified as victims of rape: 1.7 percent in their lifetime, and too few for a reliable estimate in the past year. But these numbers refer only to men who have been forced into anal sex or made to perform oral sex on another male. Nearly 7 percent of men, however, reported that at some point in their lives, they were "made to penetrate" anoth…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/09/24 02:01 AM
12

OP is simply pointing out a double standard.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 01:45 AM
3

There was a recent campaign in the United Kingdom from Nurofen about this very issue, but when you take a close look at the data they provide you can see the flaws: 1 in 2 women feel they had their pain ignored or dismissed because of their gender This is not proven, factual data. Scroll down the page you'll also see the following unsourced claim: their pain is consistently overlooked in healthcare, underrepresented in research and dismissed due to ingrained gender biases Which has essentially b…
/r/MensRights19/09/24 03:13 AM
5

Oh, sweet summer child. . .
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/09/24 12:10 AM
15

It’s not entirely feminists fault women get away with it. Not entirely but the cops, prosecutors, and judges you mention could easily be feminists, and/or follow feminist doctrine or even feminist influenced policies (such as the Duluth Model in cases of domestic violence.) Not all feminists are women.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 12:04 AM
8

No, the term is very much a problem for a myriad of reasons. Among other things the utter lack of any serious mainstream discourse or even tacit acknowledgment of toxic femininity means that the onus for "toxic" behaviour is put on masculinity, and therefore men and boys. Using the term simply perpetuates this.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 01:44 AM
33

Case in point: r/FemaleSexPredatorNews/
/r/MensRights26/08/24 09:41 PM
6

Which led to at least four deaths. Funny how that's so often swept under the rug when the suffragettes are lauded.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/24 06:23 PM
17

Misogyny literally is terrorism How? Literally how? Explain these acts of misogynistic "terrorism"? Considering women are a global minority of homicide victims, less likely to be victims of violent crime, less likely to commit suicide, and receive more lenient treatment in the justice system even for serious crimes like rape - which, in the UK, is not possible legally speaking - I'm curious to know what constitutes as "terrorism" here . . .
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/24 06:22 PM
2

Nope.
/r/Male_Studies11/08/24 05:09 PM
3

TIL the National Organisation for Women are "pop feminist reddit harpies."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/24 07:45 PM
0

I'm getting a 404 error, too. I tried searching the title and the links in the results didn't work either.
/r/Male_Studies10/08/24 07:39 PM
6

This isnt an issue to admit, why do MRAs fail to grasp it tho? Im actually asking you/anyone here. Because it's a complex issue that is often not afforded a nuanced discussion. As TheTinMen's infographic in this thread points out: the gendered gap in the criminal justice system is far larger than the racial one (slide four), but acknowledging that is sidelined to focus on the racial aspect. You'd think BLM, for example, would have wanted to focus on how black men are impacted here, and yet this …
/r/MensRights07/08/24 01:40 PM
36

Do you think if Chris Evans had reached out and touched Haley Atwell's bare breast unprompted and unscripted in such a scene that would have been considered fine and dandy?
/r/MensRights07/08/24 02:04 AM
2

I think there are a number of people on this sub who are, for lack of a better word, ignorant about how deep the rot in feminism truly is, and how pervasive that rot has spread and influenced many aspects of society - maybe due to a misguided belief that it's necessary in order to uphold the 'Left Wing' part of the sub. Threads like the one you've linked can be an eyeopener.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/24 09:15 PM
0

To be frank, from my observations of this sub I think there are a fair few people here who could do with seeing what's being posted in the linked thread and how many upvotes a number of the comments have in it. I absolutely believe in us all having the right to hold our own views and beliefs on these topics, but I can't help but feel that there is sometimes an air of naiveite or lack of awareness about certain groups and ideologies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/24 08:33 PM
9

I find it fascinating, if not unsurprising, that this doesn't get talked about often. Women have a disproportionately large influence in children's lives, both girls and boys, from the moment they're born and at the ages when they're brains are most absorbent: midwives, obstetricians, family nurses, babysitters, nannies, child minders, au pairs, kindergarten/nursery teachers/workers, elementary/primary/grade school teachers, and high/secondary school teachers are all majorly female, not to menti…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/24 08:26 PM
6

As per Reddit's own content policy rules it's essentially allowed. From this thread on the MR sub, from three years ago if you want more details.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/24 08:04 PM
10

Where are they getting 1 in 3 from now? Dubious (being generous) methodology, manipulation, and straight up lies. See: 'The Campus Rape Myth' by Heather MacDonald. The campus rape industry's central tenet is that one-quarter of all college girls will be raped or be the targets of attempted rape by the end of their college years (completed rapes outnumbering attempted rapes by a ratio of about three to two). The girls' assailants are not terrifying strangers grabbing them in dark alleys but the g…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/24 07:52 PM
2

Not the OP, but you might be interested in a couple of sources I came across which it turned out were posted on Reddit some years ago: two entries on the Slate Star Codex covering false allegations, and tangentially "anti-rape" campaigns, both pretty in-depth. And the 'Data Gone Odd' blog which also covered the topic extensively. I admit I haven't gone through them with a fine toothed comb but it seems there's plenty of data there that could be mined. After all, we know from experience by now th…
/r/MensRights01/08/24 01:43 AM
4

Maybe acknowledging and addressing the fact that women are the majority perpetrators of unilateral domestic violence just might lower the number of women being killed in these situations? But that's a conversation few want to have.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 01:25 AM
2

It's your run-of-the-mill low IQ incel comment. I do love it when people like you come here with the audacity to act all superior while throwing slurs around. From my experience debating with these people, they are incapable of thinking past their emotions. They love to ignore common sense, and especially research, in order to fuel their hatred towards the other gender. I think you're confused - this isn't a feminist sub.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 01:11 AM
1

Not to the same extent as MensLib. There's also the fact that MensLib is often recommended throughout Reddit as the "good" mens advocacy sub which many, myself included, feel the need to curb and point out what they're actually like. And NHGW seems to have a fairly small userbase by comparison: 26,100 to MensLib's 240,123, FDS's 258,419, and TwoX's alarming 13,662,966.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/07/24 10:02 PM
2

I would assume it's because MensLib touts itself as a male advocacy sub as both MR and LWMA are, whereas subs like NHGW are more akin to the likes of FemaleDatingStrategy, TwoXChromosomes, MenDrawingWomen, MenWritingWomen, etc and there are so many of those on this site - too many to be called out on the regular.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/07/24 08:48 PM
17

Personally, I think the truth will lie somewhere in the middle. I believe that due to various factors such as biases in the legal system and general social conditioning the numbers for women are exaggerated to a degree, and the numbers for men are understated to a degree. Apparently the image in the OP is via the CDC (according to a comment posted by the thread's creator) who we know use bias in regards to how male victims are counted when it comes to terminology, i.e. penetration = rape, made t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/24 01:18 AM
2

It's an account of events and history showing evidence that, contrary to the narrative, the feminist movement was never actually about true gender equality as commonly claimed, and always had a biased, bigoted disposition from its inception. When there are quite so many examples (and this is just from one person knowledgeable on the subject) of the leaders and prominent figures in the movement from the earliest "wave" acting in said disposition I think it's proof enough that the ideology itself …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/24 02:08 PM
6

This article that explores how these kind of statistics come to be via manipulation and straight up lies: 'The Campus Rape Myth' by Heather MacDonald. The whole article is worth a read of course, but here's a relevant excerpt: The campus rape industry’s central tenet is that one-quarter of all college girls will be raped or be the targets of attempted rape by the end of their college years (completed rapes outnumbering attempted rapes by a ratio of about three to two). The girls’ assailants are …
/r/EverydayMisandry05/07/24 01:00 PM
6

Women are not taken as seriously by healthcare professionals. They feel they're not taken as seriously, an important distinction. There was a recent campaign in the United Kingdom from Nurofen about this very issue, but when you take a close look at the data they provide you can see the flaws: 1 in 2 women feel they had their pain ignored or dismissed because of their gender This is not proven, factual data. Scroll down the page you'll also see the following unsourced claim: their pain is consis…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/24 04:08 PM
3

Men make up 81% of murder victims globally, as per current data; I think that number's a bit high to attribute mostly to gang violence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/24 03:50 PM
1

There's also IPV which you might come across: Intimate Partner Violence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/24 03:47 PM
9

How else should men's problems be seen? Not through the lens of a bigoted ideology would be a good start . . .
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/24 02:24 PM
3

This, sadly, doesn't surprise me. IIRC when the data from the CDC studies re "made to penetrate" etc started getting some exposure, the CDC themselves issued some sort of statement or clarification alleging that people were misinterpreting the data, basically in line with their categorisation of rape being male-on-female with penetration. This was quite a few years ago but I'm positive I've seen it mentioned before.
/r/MensRights28/06/24 10:19 PM
33

This study examining racial factors in sentencing in England and Wales has this little nugget included almost in passing: Gender Males were independently associated with approximately 83% higher odds of being sentenced to imprisonment, compared to females. Again, the effect was small but statistically significant. See also this article: 'Analysis of gender bias in sentencing data', again for England and Wales.
/r/MensRights25/06/24 08:54 PM
2

. . . I literally posted the link to your thread in my comment. Another user on the sub managed to locate the CDC studies that now lead to dead links. Can't help but wonder if it was intentional . . .
/r/MensRights24/06/24 08:53 PM
17

Another user on the sub managed to locate the CDC studies that now lead to dead links. Can't help but wonder if it was intentional . . . You might also be interested in the following studies and articles relating to this issue: 'The CDC’s Rape Numbers Are Misleading' [Article] 'Sexual Victimization by Women Is More Common Than Previously Known' [Article] 'Sexual victimization perpetrated by women: Federal data reveal surprising prevalence' [Study] 'Men's Self-Reports of Unwanted Sexual Activity'…
/r/MensRights24/06/24 06:18 PM
3

It's interesting how the commonly held, not to mention bragged about, belief that girls mature faster than boys falls to the wayside in these instances . . .
/r/MensRights19/06/24 06:27 PM
7

I guess they were trying to say you shouldn't think like that in the first place if you don't want to end up in the situation that you're in, and he's got a point. This is what I was getting at; apparently I should have specified. "Positive" discrimination, as it's sometimes called, is still ultimately discrimination, same with other terms like "punching up" being ok as opposed to "punching down" - either way, you're still punching.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/24 07:32 PM
15

Instead of solving men's problems which are largely caused by men themselves, you instead want to dog on anything even remotely helping women. Citations needed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/24 07:04 PM
14

Sorry, but I can't help but think that this kind of thinking: I will say, since this is a left wing sub, I'm okay with discriminating to correct gross imbalances, temporarily and that's the important part. For example, if there's an industry with 90% men and 10% women, it's okay to have a group for just the women so they can find solidarity and comradery. A support group for women with 1 women and 9 men isn't going to support women effectively. . . . is what leads to this: For instance, next wee…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/24 07:03 PM
10

If their posting history is anything to go by . . .
/r/MensRights13/06/24 06:59 PM
41

[Insert Facebook Favorite Marilyn Monroe Quote]
/r/MensRights12/06/24 05:56 PM
6

It's not just the Daily Mail, it's UK law.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 04:53 PM
35

I wish we could partner with women's rights groups to address these kinds of issues in a way that would benefit everyone. Women's rights groups like these?
/r/MensRights09/05/24 12:07 AM
27

I don't have a source to debunk this specific claim however I do know of an article that explores how these kind of statistics come to be via manipulation and straight up lies: 'The Campus Rape Myth' by Heather MacDonald. The whole article is worth a read of course, but here's a relevant excerpt: The campus rape industry’s central tenet is that one-quarter of all college girls will be raped or be the targets of attempted rape by the end of their college years (completed rapes outnumbering attemp…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/24 08:37 PM
4

Violence Against Women Act: Addressing domestic violence in a gender biased way. Just singling this one out because I can link a report from SAVE (Stop Abusive and Violent Environments) which explores how things like V.A.W.A. discriminate against male victims, and provides various examples: 'Domestic Violence Programs Discriminate Against Male Victims '
/r/MensRights06/04/24 05:41 PM
3

Before that. See: The Declaration of Sentiments, 1848.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 08:57 PM
3

Janice, and her work in this area, is probably not a stranger to many of the people here, but I see that this video, nor the series it is from, has never been posted before. The Fiamengo File 2.0 (playlist link below) is a very thorough, episodic exploration of the truth behind the smoke and mirrors of feminism, right from the very beginning. Although we are all definitely entitled to hold our own personal beliefs and feelings on any of these matters, I do find myself surprised sometimes when I …
/r/MensRights23/01/24 07:01 PM
16

Janice, and her work in this area, is probably not a stranger to many of the people here, but I see that this video, nor the series it is from, has never been posted before. The Fiamengo File 2.0 (playlist link below) is a very thorough, episodic exploration of the truth behind the smoke and mirrors of feminism, right from the very beginning. Although we are all definitely entitled to hold our own personal beliefs and feelings on any of these matters, I do find myself surprised sometimes when I …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/24 06:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter