| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | Yale Bioethicist breaks down everything wrong with the WHO policy regarding routine infant circumcision (Link to Thread in Description)All circumcised men have complications. The complications are that they are missing the functions of their foreskin which you are conveniently ignoring. You are in denial.... And are you seriously telling me that cutting off part of a thing, doesn't leave you with less of that thing? You must have flunked kindergarten. | /r/MensRights | 14/07/19 06:37 AM |
| 20 | Yale Bioethicist breaks down everything wrong with the WHO policy regarding routine infant circumcision (Link to Thread in Description)I don't think you know what "fully functional" means. In this context it means that you would retain all of the functions of the foreskin including: A highly sensitive frenulum. Protection for the glans of your penis to prevent it from becoming dried out and desensitized. A gliding motion which makes penetration smoother and less painful for your partner. And you're also missing hygenic functions like the anti-viral and anti-microbial properties found in langerhans cells and smega. And how the f… | /r/MensRights | 14/07/19 06:23 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter