TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

leestegosaurus Archive

View 0 posts and 35 comments by leestegosaurus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's literally not but okay.
/r/MensRights07/09/23 04:32 PM
1

False positives can occur when too few genetic markers are compared or when common markers (those shared by a large percent of the population) are compared.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 03:57 PM
–

Why in tf would any woman want to "pin" their pregnancy on a homeless unemployed indigent bum who has 2 other kids he's not supporting?
/r/MensRights28/07/23 12:05 AM
1

You know that paternity court is not a real court, right? You don't have to participate. You think she voluntarily went on a show that would prove she committed fraud and open her up to civil and criminal cases? How does that add up?
/r/MensRights27/07/23 11:52 PM
1

Made more than the real father? He was unemployed and living with his mother.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 01:56 PM
1

Well said. Knowing the other guy and knowing he was the father are very different things.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 01:54 PM
1

False
/r/MensRights26/07/23 01:51 PM
1

Smoking what?
/r/MensRights26/07/23 01:50 PM
1

Or she knew because she only had 2 partners at the time of conception.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 01:50 PM
2

She actually didn't.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 01:48 PM
1

There are actually other ways to get a false positive- cross contamination, mislabeled samples. The logical explanation is that the lab made a mistake because she DIDN'T submit his DNA.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 01:47 PM
1

Right? It's crazy to me that people would rather believe that she committed fraud than believe that labs can make mistakes.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 01:38 PM
1

There were only two potential fathers. If it wasn't Manser, it was the other guy. How does that mean she lied?
/r/MensRights26/07/23 01:18 PM
2

She worked at the lab?
/r/MensRights26/07/23 12:24 AM
1

Anyone. Most people don't resort to name calling when they actually know what they're talking about.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 12:18 AM
1

She didn't submit his DNA. What is so difficult to understand about that?
/r/MensRights26/07/23 12:17 AM
1

Yeah, that's not how it works. Points for creativity, though.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 08:07 PM
1

Your failure to comprehend a TV show you watched doesn't exactly qualify you to comment on the subject. Your personal attacks don't give you much more credit, either.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 07:26 PM
1

The lab had his DNA from a previous paternity case, regarding another child, by a different woman.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 12:44 AM
1

I didn't miss that. I just understood that his DNA was already on file at the same lab from a previous paternity case, in which he DID submit DNA. That was all laid out in the lawsuit they filed jointly against the lab. Watching a TV show that was created for your entertainment isn't the best way to get your info.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 04:55 PM
1

Educate yourself.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 09:47 PM
2

Sadly, nobody is paying me my critical thinking skills. It just bothers me to see so many people ready to burn this bitch at the stake, just because they need someone to blame. If you're gonna go after someone that hard, at least get your facts straight.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 11:11 PM
1

She didn't cheat on him but whatever but that's irrelevant. She didn't let him go to prison. That wasn't up to her. Why do you think it was on her to get another DNA test? She had no reason to question the first one.
/r/MensRights30/06/23 10:58 PM
1

Don't take my word for it. The truth is out there, if you're curious.
/r/MensRights29/06/23 04:31 PM
1

I watched the show and read the lawsuit. Inform yourself.
/r/MensRights29/06/23 04:06 PM
1

https://casetext.com/case/sehr-v-lab-corp If you're going to speak on something with such confidence, at least get SOME of the facts right.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 10:51 PM
1

https://casetext.com/case/sehr-v-lab-corp From the lawsuit against the lab, filed jointly by the mother, son, and Manser.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 10:46 PM
1

People are quoting other comments or gossip sites, as fact. The truth is he submitted his DNA in a previous paternity case. He failed to respond to this paternity case and the lab used the old DNA. A mistake was made and since he didn't bother to show up in court, to question the results, the court declared him the father. A combination of factors led his incarceration, including human error in the lab, a flawed court system, and his own irresponsibility.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 04:58 PM
1

Check the source. She worked at a plasma donation center. Never had access to his DNA or any involvement in the testing.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 05:06 AM
2

He went to jail for being irresponsible. He ignored his chance to go to court, and he ignored court ordered payments for 3 years.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 05:40 PM
1

🫢 Awww Are you stalking me? That's so sweet and sad..
/r/MensRights19/06/23 05:34 PM
1

I watched her say that a DNA test said he was the father. I also watched her admit to being in a relationship with someone else. People just really need a villain, though..
/r/MensRights19/06/23 05:31 PM
1

She gets pregnant, there are 2 potential fathers, (which she didn't deny) the first one tested is a 99% DNA match. She believed the results of the DNA test. So who did she lie to?
/r/MensRights15/06/23 07:55 PM
3

I don't understand how so much false information is being perpetuated here.. the mob mentality is gross.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 07:15 PM
1

She didn't deny being in a relationship with someone else but a DNA test said this dude was the father so she believed it. Most people do believe DNA results. That doesn't mean she lied, or tried ruin his life. It doesn't make her responsible for what happened to him.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 07:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter