TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

leftleafthirdbranch Archive

View 1 post and 87 comments by leftleafthirdbranch on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
73

leftleafthirdbranch/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 12:47 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

While I appreciate the sentiment, I cannot agree with your conclusion in good faith. 1st world countries, while their people are financially secure, are not necessarily the happiest places in the world." There are plenty of psychological disturbances that haunt the metropolitan consciousness.
/r/ExRedPill09/04/20 05:07 AM
1

It's also because a certain degree of diverse choice is critical to maintaining female choice (as per sexual selection theory)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 06:12 AM
5

It seems like you half-know the answer to your question, and are anticipating a certain response. Women do this because they wish those men would date them instead of the other, younger women. But they are working against the tide, because younger women are more fertile -- thus, men will usually date younger women. By openly condemning you (and others, particularly males that are her type) for their preferences, they hope to curb the biological preference for younger women by perpetuating a soci…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 04:27 AM
1

lmfaooo yeah kinda true. i meant competition in the context of male bonding theory (kinda like in Sparta). and remember those memes where guys were like "yeah i'd suck a dick in ww3 staying alive is staying alive"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 04:00 AM
1

I sort of agree, but I was referring to things like homosexuality. I think sex is also intended to decrease competition and facilitate social bonding.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 02:42 AM
4

The answer is more complicated than one might think. It's even more complex than the matter of what is physically attractive (although they are related). In general, I think women are probably more submissive. So anything that reinforces the power dynamic tends to be favored by these kinds of women. In general, for women, I would assume that the emotion behind sex is most important (ex. sex is better when it's love sex) which explains why women prefer sex that reinforces certain ideas like a pow…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 12:25 AM
1

That makes sense. Studying hiercheries in societies (from ancestral to modern), one finds that high-status males will always get the most bitches. High status people have more power by definition because they have power over supplies and people. In fact, power and status are essentially one and the same because high power ALWAYS coincides with high status (this is a vast oversimplification in today's society, if you want I can clarify more.) And wealth is basically a formal system for power. As …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 12:01 AM
1

I mean, literally, religious ideology (or more accurately for America, since religion is in fast decline: American culture) and biology are the two main reasons for double standards so. Please name women's "double standards" for men, which are not caused by biological reasons. and wealth, power, and status as attraction factors are not biological? power and status are intricably involved with nature, as hierchery is inherent in our human nature. and wealth is just another form of power and statu…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 07:32 AM
1

probably the slut-shaming women but uplifting guys with high body counts one?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 03:41 PM
1

This applies more to real life, but....the more cynical part of me would be inclined to say that they are primarily concerned (subconsciously or not) with how toxic masculinity negatively affects THEM rather than the males themselves (toxic masculinity may encourage a guy to reveal intimate details about his sexual activity, compromising the status of girls he had sex with, or to be emotionally repressed). Additionally, By lampooning toxic masculinity, feminists also attempt to appeal to non-gen…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 06:38 AM
1

That also happens with women as well, where the instinct is to constantly worry about your appearance, and be overly receptive to the negative (and positive) feedback of others. It's probably related to why girls are more successful in school because the school system rewards docileness and obidience, but then as these behaviors become rewarded less and indvidiualism becomes more important to educational success, this changes (can't remember if men become more high achieving or it evens out idk)…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 06:15 AM
2

your experience?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 06:00 AM
1

hah like Dworkin says, sexual intelligence is concerned with questions of dominance and submission. "Authority" is illegitimate and is basically rape and I correctly experience it as such. I wouldn't say that "authority" is illegitimate because it obviously holds weight in the minds of people -- for example, most countries aren't having protests everyday like France. In fact hierchery and society is an expected human development. Then again I do not know what you define as legitmate so perhaps m…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 04:58 AM
1

Wait, women don't develop an aversion to this? If what you are saying is true, though, then I would guess that it's because they romanticize the idea that these guys might've end up falling for them in another scenario. And in that scenario, being the one special woman would guarentee high-parental investment and also having a highly coveted partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 04:13 AM
2

i mean, tbh, engagement rings are fucking bullshit anyways. diamonds aren't worth shit in terms of resell value, it's just another result of corporate manipulation.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 04:05 AM
2

a few questions.... how would we know if an animal is being raped? i suppose, if we could pin down whether they were distressed, that would be suggestive of non-consent. (it is possible that in certain species, rape plays a more dramatic role in mating.) venturing a guess, i think it would be easier to understand and detect distress in mammals. most of the time we observe mammals, though, we observe them in artifical, human conditions, meaning the exhibited behavior will diverge extremely from t…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 04:03 AM
1

i agree with you about how there hasn't been much pressure to reduce gender standards related to men but I would argue that double standards relating to women still exist and are in fact perpetuated by both women and men alike. To be fair, there are biological factors that explain some of the persistent double standards (ex. slut-shaming for women, which is characterized by a turmultous attitude, and with men it's pretty much a compliment to be a manwhore), but that does not deny the fact that t…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 03:08 AM
1

not to be that one person who harkens back to evolution, but it is true that females are "choosers" and males will try to attract the females with displays of skill or wealth or whatever. this is apparent in many cultural norms -- for example, men often ask the women for hand in marriage, giving the women the choice whether to accept or refuse. so that may be part of the reason why advertisement often carry the theme of buying gifts for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 02:56 AM
3

I'm not sure if it's really accurate to make the comparison of women as sellers and men as buyers in the case of relationships because it only works one way. Is it not true that females tend to be more selective than males, after all? Another factor you forgot about was demand. If a woman has slept with a lot of men, that means she is in high demand. In this case, the ratio of supply to demand would be more important than the actual men herself. But more importantly, your question contains hidde…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/20 05:20 AM
2

because you can also measure value in terms of the individual. for example, you might appreciate it more if a shy person who really really liked you gathered up the courage to approach you than if a player did the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/20 04:44 AM
3

yes I do!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 03:07 AM
3

It's strange that most of the RP subreddit staunchly opposes MMC. MMC model would expand nicely on how hierchery affects sexual strategy, which is already a topic of interest in RP. I suspect that the reason for the pushback is something to do with pride, but still, MMC has a lot of potential and could offer a more comprehensive view of sexual dynamics.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/20 03:19 AM
1

I see what you are saying now. If I may chime in, I think there is also reason to believe that male parental investment is not just a modern societal construct, but rather a result of sexual selection by females. Do females not highly value parental investment? When you add in matters like infanticide (surprisingly prevalent in ancestral landscape, or not so surprising if you look at early civilized history), it is not unreasonable to believe that there are males who adopt the strategy of having…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/20 07:04 AM
1

Why wouldn't MCFC make sense with birth control?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/20 05:35 AM
10

actually the model of MMC allows for females to be choosier than males. so the requirement for MMC would have already been fullfilled by the fact of females having selected for male parental investment
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/20 05:29 AM
5

what better way to rethink social norms than going to school, which (should) teach critical thinking skills? idk coz i'm not a man, but isn't it true that sex feels better without condoms? but with women birth control, it makes no difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/19 11:34 PM
3

(scrolling thru reddit) (sees template form) (comments have template form) (looks for meta comment reply) (finds meta comment reply) (stereotypical thats meta comment reply) thats meta
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/19 02:38 AM
3

(shids and farts)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/19 02:36 AM
6

we not AVERAGE. we are ABOVE AVERAGE. repeat it with me boys: virginity is cool! virginity is cool!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 01:44 AM
0

why get married ...................................................if you don't want to have kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/19 09:29 PM
1

hmmm. what economic models are you referencing for 5? (I know this is common knowledge but it's something I've been doubting for awhile. you don't have to explain if you don't feel like it obviously) I think that the neg. population growth is more bc of women getting more job opportunities which apparently makes them marry later, so you're technically correct. the point here is a little different from points such as 2 and 3. like, the way you refer to it as a "failed experiment" implies that the…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/19 09:10 PM
0

do you have any citations for the bit about stigma among prisoners?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 03:25 AM
1

Somehow I don't think he's going to have too much luck getting laid after this
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 03:08 AM
2

i dont know if thats related to whether they get it or not, i think that's just the natural development of slang
/r/TheRedPill04/10/19 02:53 AM
1

do u have a link for the college gyms thing ?
/r/TheRedPill03/10/19 02:27 AM
1

Modern problems require modern solutions
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/19 02:10 AM
1

If that were true wouldn’t r/conservative get taken down since it encompasses all degrees of right wing
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/19 01:45 AM
1

Thank u sm for reminding me !
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/19 03:09 PM
1

Nah most Reddit users don’t give a shit either way I’d wager. I think it’s mostly the fact that having RP does not make Reddit appeal to ad companies.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/19 03:08 PM
1

what does liking shorter men have to do with equal rights ? not to defend the clusterfuck that is modern day feminism, but is it not possible to at once vouch for feminism and also operate on clear sexual preferences ?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 04:52 AM
1

Which subs ?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 04:50 AM
6

Based on Reddit banning TRP, what subs do u think deserve the ban ?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 04:49 AM
1

Thé glaringly obvious thing that I think Reddit would have a problem with is the infantilisation of women (basically they say all women are slutty and childish).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 04:49 AM
1

Yeah fax they are even moving to a website so what do you mean by that last paragraph ?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 04:47 AM
4

It seems quite toxic I agree. But the way Reddit handled it was poor and unprofessional, and I’m not sure that Reddit just chucking the community out was he best move if they actually wanted to enervate the movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 04:42 AM
1

Sometimes, when a crime is committed, the media will blame whatever influenced the person. For mass shootings, white supremacy and other manifestos are blamed, along with online communities that have helped the rise of these criminals (4chan). To take an extremely unfair example: the media blaming Pewdiepie for a mass shooting bc the shooter said Sub to Pewdiepie. So, If somebody who was influenced by a Reddit community does something bad, guess who the media is going to blame?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 04:38 AM
5

LMFAOO
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 04:30 AM
1

I mostly meant it in the sense of « with great power comes great responsibility ».... you know, with powerful companies being reckless to the detriment of society’s (A range of examples with varying impacts: The end of railroads in America, Dole, Verizon throttling data during a fire....) And since Reddit is based in America, it makes sense that they should be aware of how their actions impact the First Amendment. I would say it’s also important for (good) companies (that want to keep making mon…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 04:29 AM
2

The other alternative is to have PPD equivalents, which I think is more doable because a lot of people (from these social groups particularly) aren’t universally opposed to echo chambers and in fact seek them out. Having PPD equivalents means that the critical uncensored discussion people like can coexist with echo chambers which ppl also like.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 04:02 AM
2

????
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 03:04 AM
1

I agree. It’s a disturbing trend. Another downside is that by further pushing these groups away from mainstream media it has become harder to keep tabs on ( or at least be cognizant of) their various machinations and discussions. Keep your enemies close, as they say. (Then again, there’s probably liability issues......) Tbh? I don’t think they give a shit. They can’t even decide if they are for free speech : https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theverge.com/platform/amp/2015/7/15/8964995/reddit-free…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 03:02 AM
3

This is so well articulated! I’ve been struggling awhile with this question because in my mind, restrictions of free speech already exist in the form of politeness and socially acceptable behaviors, and I’m trying (with much failure) to decide where the « line « is. Or in other words, when do « natural consequences » become (casual???) restrictions of free speech?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 02:59 AM
1

Gave up on what exactly ?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 02:55 AM
2

What new policy?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 02:54 AM
2

Im assuming from your previous comments that you meant to say that corporations are motivated solely by money. It comes down to the question of whether it’s « okay » for a large and influential corporation to propagate their own moral agenda — in this case, to the point of literal censorship, which stands against their putative beliefs. Now, motivation for earning money and propagating a consistent moral agenda will clash and sometimes even agree with each other, depending on the weather. It is …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 02:45 AM
3

I think the situation on here is different because it’s unsure whether TRP broke any community guidelines or not. Reddit’s response fucking sucks though. They didn’t even tell the community where they broke the rules and how. Shady, if you ask me... unless they received warnings or it was obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 02:23 AM
3

What do you mean by the last line? What should laws do to prevent ...... people with obvious interests from « controlling the conversation »? Are you specifically referring to corporations or various social groups? I would argue that the internet is a bit different in the sense that freedom of speech will never be fully limited on here. (Not sure How Net Neutrality or copyright stuffs affect this tho). Then again, theres the whole notion of visibility that applies when discussing anything on the…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 02:20 AM
1

Absolutely agree ! Not to mention that whether or not what Reddit is doing has severe enough impact to constitute as silencing (there are natural consequences , obviously, but it’s not exactly the same as, like, anti censorship laws or decreasing job opportunities) is up for debate as well. Is the second paragraph a reference to something that has happened ??? “”””And I think if the lily white manosphere had chosen to adopt a little more humility and honesty about their own reality that this mig…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 01:41 AM
0

I think on one hand, Reddit is a company. On the other hand, given that it’s so relevant, shutting down the community, even if they can relocate, will probably negatively impact the growth of the community. I think the question is, do large corporations — like Reddit — have an obligation to facilitate free speech? (even when the company perceives such as a monetary risk, as is the case now?) Additionally, the message from Reddit claimed that the community was harassing (not sure if this is true)…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 01:38 AM
1

What do you mean by small talk?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/19 05:25 AM
1

oh, so you mean, women give off the facade of disliking dishonesty? I think that the general consensus seems to be: if a guy is honest (about their intentions), and if their intentions are what you deem honorable or acceptable, then they are datable (disregarding for a moment the multitudes of other personal criteria). It's like, if a murderer was honest about his intentions to murder you, I doubt your first reaction would be "well, he was very sincere and honest; I liked that." It's an extreme …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/19 02:28 AM
1

hm, what do you mean by external facade of honesty? not sure how it's related to the idea that we give and expect externally? (not sure what you're referring to there either?) i think i understand what you mean by internally relishing the illusion of fantasy (i can't help but think that the illusion of fantasy is a compromise, a balance between pure honesty and being hurt) but could you give an example of the former two?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/19 06:33 AM
1

could u elaborate on what u mean by emotional utility
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/19 09:34 AM
0

so basically what ur saying is that , in first impressions, honesty is incongruent with effectiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/19 09:21 AM
1

Longer lifespan >> more population >> less fertility.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 09:40 PM
2

Ah i see. Tbh was mostly asking about how the hand slapping analogy related to that . Thank u tho <3333
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 09:09 PM
0

Thanks bro
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 07:43 PM
0

Can you explain this
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 06:54 PM
1

Where’s the spreadsheet story?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 09:04 PM
1

What do you mean by the last line?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 08:58 PM
1

I think that it makes biological sense for a women 2 have a good gut feeling (esp when it comes to potential predators) and the same goes for men. In fact many people have gut feelings, but society has drills into us the idea that gut feelings are not 2 be trusted (which is a belief u seem 2 partake in aswell) and thus people often don’t develop their gut feelings as much as they could. Even factoring in societal influence, it’s wayyy more risky for women 2 not trust their gut feelings in the ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 08:21 PM
2

The bold statement is pretty accurate. I think, if you really can give great sex to a woman, that this is also a way of showing her you care about her needs. So I guess the "asshole" is cancelled out by being attractive and being good at sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/19 06:12 AM
1

i feel like this is an issue that extends beyond the realm of gender?? (in my opinion) like, i'm pretty sure any sensible person would agree that nobody is entitled to a relationship. but i think most can agree that it's detrimental both to the men and the women to pursue a relationship based on somebody's one-sided desire to start a committed relationship? like if a man doesn't want a committed relationship he should be upfront about it instead of entering an unhappy relationship (which is real…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/19 05:34 AM
3

i think it's because this ratio doesn't exist in all colleges?? (idk if there's a clear trend indicating that most colleges are female dominated though)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/19 05:24 AM
4

That's an extremely stupid system as it says people are incapable of making conscious intelligent choices. They want what is scarce, which means scarcity based mindset. It means anything abundant is unappreciated including food and water. People don't appreciate clean water until it's gone, or a breath of fresh air until they're sick or breathing smog. It says more about us being barely more than savages than anything else, that the human race is still extremely unevolved and has a long way to g…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/19 05:23 AM
1

yeah and what about it lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/18 01:58 AM
1

the moment you try to undermine somebody's point by accusing them of learning English as a second-language based on a single grammatical error that isn't even a grammatical error... you've lost the argument. just take the L ​
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/18 01:26 AM
1

Fundamental and inherent have identical meanings in this context. Do you not know what a "fundamental difference" is, or something? I was specifically addressing this point. For more context, you had another thread going on where you told somebody they didn't understand the words they were using after they explained why they didn't believe men and women to be fundamentally different. I literally gave the dictionary definition of fundamental, which i used to explain why the examples you used to j…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/18 01:11 AM
1

You have a fair point. I realize you weren't trying to demean anybody. In the context of red pill fourms, I would say that the term "entitled" is absolutely meant to demean women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/18 04:21 AM
1

Uncomfortable is an adjective. Dislike is a verb. They aren't even on the same spectrum. If a man makes a woman uncomfortable, we call him a fucking creep and leave. I would say to hate is a blanket term - dislike would be a very weak degree of hatred. Hate has an alternative definition of being a high degree of...well, hatred, and very strong prejudice against. Generally, when we use hate as we would dislike we are intentionally exaggerating (similar to the use of the word literally). Misogyny …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/18 04:19 AM
1

I'd disagree and say that they didn't feel that "care" that you described at all. Most of the comments I've seen about it are mostly making fun of her disability.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/18 04:00 AM
2

You see how they have expanded the definition of hatred to include dislike? I dislike rainy days, doesn't mean I hate rain... You seem to hold some disdain for the natural processes evolution in our English language. English vocabulary is not proscribed, unlike (modern) English grammar. Words evolve and take on new meanings -- the definition of a word reflects how it is currently used. We're not France. We can't just forcibly change the definition of the word misogynist because the misogynist in…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/18 03:19 AM
1

You're conflating being interested in dumb shit with not being interested in smart shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/18 02:53 AM
2

I think it is you who misunderstands what a "fundamental difference" means. Here's the dictionary definition of fundamental: Forming a necessary base or core; of central importance. A central or primary rule or principle on which something is based. We can tentatively conclude that the only fundamental difference between females and males are their sexual genitals. I'm assuming that you are not trying to use this particular difference to prove your point that men and women are fundamentally diff…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/18 02:50 AM
1

I have to agree with Szymmy here on the use of the word "entitled," especially since the word "deserve," which has less of a negative connotation, is far more befitting.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/18 02:16 AM
2

Maybe, just maybe, it's because people tend to hang out with those who share common core beliefs, whereas the internet exposes you to all sorts of people with differing opinions, especially if you hang out in threads like this one which are meant to host discourse between two opposing groups.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/18 02:09 AM
4

The difference between these dystopias and this is in the case of Reddit you can just........move to .....another site.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/18 07:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter