TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

leftofcentaur Archive

View 11 posts and 110 comments by leftofcentaur on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1477

leftofcentaur/r/MensRights30/12/13 01:23 PM
525

leftofcentaur/r/MensRights01/12/13 09:56 AM
488

leftofcentaur/r/MensRights23/10/13 03:15 PM
60

leftofcentaur/r/MensRights16/01/14 04:32 PM
55

Men's Rights Newsleftofcentaur/r/MensRights08/05/14 02:34 PM
55

leftofcentaur/r/MensRights12/10/13 06:59 PM
31

leftofcentaur/r/MensRights02/04/14 03:31 PM
31

leftofcentaur/r/MensRights12/01/14 08:15 PM
23

leftofcentaur/r/MensRights29/07/13 09:08 AM
3

leftofcentaur/r/MensRights04/09/13 09:07 PM
0

leftofcentaur/r/MensRights29/09/13 09:27 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Cannot agree with this enough.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 10:16 AM
1

Didn't someone there also start making a prison rape joke too, but then catch himself at the last second?If so, it's just not good enough. Off-colour jokes have their place, for sure; with trusted friends for example. But at a conference that you know is being covered by the press and at which one of the points being raised is how male rape is brushed under the carpet? That's just damn stupid.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 12:26 PM
3

If you take away the 'but', all you have is 'yes'. I think you're absolutely right. I would love a men's rights movement to be proud of, where high-profile members don't dilute important messages about vital issues with unnecessary aggression. Few sensible people will argue with points like "too many men kill themselves, what can we do to stop it?" But when the message being broadcast is "too many men kill themselves, and it's because of women" it's no wonder both men and women turn away. Look a…
/r/MensRights03/07/14 11:22 AM
1

This absolutely does not belong in here. First of all, someone having a go at a breastfeeding woman is a dick. Secondly, it's posts like this that give others the impression that /r/mensrights is just a place for people to gather and bitch about women.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 08:17 AM
16

What's "homocide"?
/r/MensRights12/06/14 04:45 PM
1

I read most. I think it's important to read all points of view, even those I disagree with. Same goes for newspapers.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 12:53 PM
0

Thank you.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 08:27 PM
1

I completely take your point, and I'm grateful that you are disagreeing with me respectfully. In fact, I agree with lots of your points. I think honest discourse is better than sterile politically-correct bullshit, but sometimes it tips over too far. I've been angry and bitter too. I guess the difference now is, we (as a sub) are getting big, and the MRM is getting a lot of attention. We have a real opportunity right now to get our message across to people who may not have ever considered there …
/r/MensRights11/06/14 08:01 PM
1

It's far, far harder for people to twist Farrell's words. Elam... not so much. And I think "I find [fembots] so pernicious and repugnant that the idea of fucking your shit up gives me an erection" is very, very problematic. If you don't, then that's great for you, but I think you may find it hard to win people over who are not already partisan. It takes intelligence to be provocative in a way that inspires debate and actually encourages people to listen. Elam and many AVfM writers are lacking th…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:56 PM
1

Classic Reddit response. But it's our job, as readers, to criticise what we don't like and make clear what we do. That's how things progress and improve. "I don't like what X politician is doing." "Then go into politics, quit complaining." It's just not an argument that stands up, for me.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:53 PM
1

We're not talking about 'turning' on large groups though. In fact, I don't can't think of anyone who has been ousted for unhelpful behaviour. This would probably be a first. His brand of writing is just not doing us any good. Major publications are starting to cover men's rights in an honest way, but this guy shouting from the sidelines detracts from otherwise solid messages. Take Dean Esmay on that Fox affiliate show the other day. Solid points made, but slightly spoiled by the abject anti-femi…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:45 PM
1

His 'satirical' pieces for starters. They are so poor, it's not obvious it's satire until he says so. Even his non-satire is loaded with language that would provoke the more easily-led reader to doing something silly. His writing is laced with misogyny, genuine hatred. That is dangerous. My opinion.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:42 PM
8

Don't get me wrong, I don't think we should shut down everyone who doesn't fit the hivemind. And it's good that it gets downvoted and disagreed with; just wish we didn't have to deal with that kind of nonsense at all, because I don't think it's just poorly expressed stuff that nonetheless comes from a positive place. I honestly believe that people who spew hateful shit are doing it just to get attention or to damage the MRM. Over the last day or so I've made a couple of comments along the lines …
/r/MensRights11/06/14 08:21 AM
12

I think maybe the stuff he "doesn't want to hear" is more along the lines of "you should've knocked that that cunt out". But I may be wrong. I know comments like that are relatively uncommon, but it takes one to confirm his bias and we'll have pushed away someone who needed our help; let alone get them to start thinking about men's issues in a positive way.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:25 AM
-3

I really, really hope that if that guy did come here, he wouldn't be met with the kind of "fuck that bitch" comments that he expects to find. But I've been here long enough to know that comments like that do get thrown around. This is another example of why I really think we need to be moderate in our language. I know that's not a popular view with everyone, but this is the world we're living in. Even after being attacked, this guy is still wary about the MRM, so aggressive language isn't going …
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:22 AM
0

You do when they are hurting the whole movement with ill-thought-out articles. All it takes is for one person who was on the fence about the MRM to see one of his more 'feisty' pieces and they'll think "damn, they're exactly what the media says they are", write us off and we've lost someone who could have been a potentially powerful ally.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:17 AM
0

Then we'll never get anywhere. His language is dangerous and offensive and plays directly into the arguments of those who label us as "woman haters".
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:13 AM
-5

Once again, Elam's "satire" is used against us. Can we cut him loose already?
/r/MensRights10/06/14 11:18 PM
1

And that's part of the problem, whitmatt. When we talk about serious issues facing men (like homelessness rates, lack of cancer funding, boys failing in education, male rape being denied, high suicide rates), the return is often something completely flimsy like "But why is this picture of a robot female?". It would be laughable if silly concerns like that (it's a real thing) didn't get a ton of attention while issues that are literally killing men by the thousands are overlooked.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 10:03 AM
1

I would love for us to put more focus on racism and gay rights, however when I've mentioned it before, the suggestion is shot down as apparently it's not strictly about men's rights. The thing is, I think it is, and when I see some of the other things people on here get worked up about, it boggles my mind that we don't dedicate more energy to aiding and defending our gay and minority members. Gay rights should come under the banner of men's rights as gay men still face levels of hate and discrim…
/r/MensRights31/05/14 08:52 PM
4

I think most people, on both sides, want a dialogue. The problem is, when men's rights advocates try to instigate 'peace talks', they are shouted down by the more vocal members of the feminism subs and/or banned. Equally, when non-radical feminists suggest talking to men's rights advocates, they are warned that the sub is full of women-haters and their inbox will fill up with death threats. It's deliberate disinformation and grossly dishonest. Thankfully, when people like you decide to ignore wh…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 08:17 AM
2

Don't worry, it still is.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 11:24 PM
1

Wait until everyone in the UK gets back to work on Tuesday; The Guardian will have a handful of articles blaming the MRM live by noon. And where The Guardian goes, The Huffington Post and Buzzfeed follow.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 11:22 PM
11

Y'know, this isn't a bad idea. Because the NAFALT argument is actually logically sound. Hell, I find myself saying the MRA equivalent when an MRA does something stupid or hateful and we all get tarred with the same brush. However, highlighting that no organisations - the people in power; the ones who supposedly rise above the hateful behaviour of individuals; the arbiters of what is good and just in a societal movement - have condemned an action, speaks volumes. It's the difference between havin…
/r/MensRights10/05/14 03:10 PM
8

The EU ruled against insurers discriminating against men a couple of years ago, on the basis that it was sexist. There may be solid arguments that can be used in the US as well.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 08:48 AM
1

I'm reading some of the responses on the equivalent post and... damn... a lot of them are sensible and reasonable. What the hell is happening?
/r/MensRights30/04/14 10:19 PM
3

Sometimes, I try to defend things, but when I see anything from Elam, I have no choice but to throw my hands up and quit. His clumsy 'satire' and aggressive rhetoric does so, so little to help us and just gives firepower to those who oppose us. In the right hands, and with the right direction, AVFM could be a real bastion in the fight for equality, but then I see quotes like this and it depresses me how gladly some people celebrate and defer to an individual who unthinkingly enables those with a…
/r/MensRights20/04/14 12:27 AM
8

I guarantee she'll cut it down and/or change what you've said. She never allows sensible comments that disagree with her to stand.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 04:28 PM
24

This person is a renowned bigot and troll. Please do not give her the clicks she so clearly craves and just screenshot that shit.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 04:24 PM
2

This is so, so poorly written. Just proof things before you hit 'publish'.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 07:17 PM
1

Sorry, I must have missed that. Thanks for clarifying.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 12:25 PM
1

Mods: How would you like us to draw attention to people of influence saying hateful, damaging things on Twitter? Screenshot with blurring of names/images? Doxxing is wrong, as is harassment. Pointing out vile, bigoted rhetoric in the hope of getting it removed is necessary in proving that the things some people say/do is not okay.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 10:43 AM
5

"They"
/r/MensRights08/04/14 10:41 AM
22

Well said. Bob Geldof has done an awful lot to highlight the plight of estranged fathers and the imbalance in the British legal system.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 10:13 AM
22

Google "men's rights" and you'll find us. Many people come here looking to find out more about the movement. These might be people who: Are not keen on the MRM Have already decided that they definitely want to get involved Are on the fence about the MRM Literally know nothing about it but just want to find out more It's those last two I'm interested in. If someone lands here hoping to find out more, they are likely going to be immediately put off by a misogynist comment. "Well, men's rights soun…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 10:06 AM
1

Even if that's true doesn't it kind of go against the point leftofcentaur was making? "You disagree, so we don't have to be polite!" I'll admit, that seems to be kind of true in this thread, and it's a shame to see. If you were here trolling and attacking people, I'd understand, but from what I can see you're presenting your point of view in a fairly measured way. I don't necessarily agree with your point of view, but you're certainly not being a dick.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 06:27 AM
6

Feminists won't have a bright and rosy time on the sub That's not actually true, we have a great many people here who identify as feminist (whether that's solely as feminist or as feminist and MRA) and they are treated with courtesy and respect. Unlike many subs, we don't attack/ban people for having different opinions, and we get some pretty good discussions out of it.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 10:28 PM
5

This constant use of "men's rights" in articles is infuriating. Putting the term in quotes to suggest it doesn't exist is a cheap tactic, and is another example of the constant drip drip drip of making men's issues seem somehow "lesser".
/r/MensRights30/03/14 09:40 PM
2

My one criticism is that this article still makes the assumption that all rapists are male.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 12:44 PM
3

That's right, upvote the troll. C'mon, people.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:41 AM
7

As this vile person's blog has appeared in the past generally demonising men, I don't want to give them any additional traffic. Would anyone be kind enough to provide a screenshot?
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:39 PM
-7

The "drowning kids", "demanding respect" and puppy picture all need to go.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 08:36 AM
1

We want the law changed to recognise that threatening and coercing men into having sex is rape. I see no problem with the same courtesy being extended to women.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 04:24 PM
4

It's really heartening to see this as the top comment. It's one of the reasons why - despite the idiocy elsewhere - I still have hope for this movement and this sub. Honesty and integrity, even when they might be counter to our arguments, is vital.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 12:09 AM
3

Said it earlier this week, will say it again: this one has form, is a committed troll and absolutely nothing is beneath her. It's not something I say much, but she is scum.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 08:19 PM
2

I don't deny that there are people in there with issues, and I hope they're able to work through their problems, but what I mostly see is anti-female aggression. And you know what, even if you have been damaged, that's no reason to act like an arse. Being able to recognise that there are issues, yet still conduct yourself like a grown-up is what separates us from the Tumblr idiots.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 02:03 PM
0

Mentioning the IRA in relation to MRAs is not cool at all. The IRA brutally murdered thousands of people, and you want to raise that spectre? Think on.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 02:01 PM
-1

I think it's a pretty shitty place with pretty shitty people that does the MRM a great deal of harm through its loose association. Occasionally someone says something valuable, but that is very rare, and the comments would be better placed here.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 12:50 PM
2

I wish more people here thought like you - we'd face far fewer accusations of hating women. Shades of grey, people.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 10:22 AM
7

It is. Some MPs are calling for women to not be imprisoned. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/report-proposes-closing-womens-prisons-2293495.html
/r/MensRights02/02/14 10:18 AM
3

I don't. I oppose anyone who opposes equality. If they happen to identify as feminist and say hateful things about men, that's their business. Just like I oppose anyone who identifies as MRA and says hateful things about women. From my perspective, the MRM isn't anti-feminist, but it is against some feminist activities that oppress or marginalise men.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 12:07 AM
1

Alright, I've seen this too many times now. Can we give it maybe six months before wheeling this tired old point out again?
/r/MensRights26/01/14 06:20 PM
1

I think that joking about rape is fair game (unless you're making deliberately hurtful jokes at a rape victim). The issue here, I feel, is the double standard. A man even alluding to rape is aggressively pursued by leftists and radical feminists, demonised and forced to apologise - even if he wasn't telling a joke and was talking seriously ('You have no right to talk about this'/'You're mansplaining'/'Privilege says your opinion doesn't matter'). However, on the other side of the coin, this kind…
/r/MensRights24/01/14 02:07 PM
1

Only a tiny fraction of Huffington Post writers get paid. I'm guessing he's not one of them.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 07:49 PM
2

When the first Hunger Games came out, she got a lot of stick from critics. Link
/r/MensRights16/01/14 11:13 PM
1

I don't know what that means. But you're asking if I'm concerned that MRAs being made to look like pricks by people with no understanding of how the outside world works, then yes.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 10:26 PM
1

That doesn't make sense. You can't grow a movement by only preaching to the converted.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 08:31 PM
3

I expected a reply like this. And it's another example of not looking at the big picture. First of all, 20,000 people thinking we suck does matter, even more so when you consider the combined reach of those 20,000. Which - as I said above - comes to more than 20,000. And you know what, if someone who hadn't heard of the MRM yesterday now hates us, then that's one person too many. It's been said before that there's no point in arguing with radical feminists because their minds have already been m…
/r/MensRights14/01/14 02:29 PM
14

I get criticised for saying that as this is a public space, people should watch their tone as an aggressive comment could be enough to turn off a new visitor. But... See how he's deviously cherry picking the worst comments from this thread and putting them on his Twitter which has 20k+ followers? And those tweets are being retweeted and commented on by other users with large followings, with one saying "I didn't realise I hated MRAs until now"? That's a lot of people seeing the worst side of the…
/r/MensRights14/01/14 09:37 AM
1

The issue for me is, if you made a comment about not being disappointed at having to kiss a fat Claudia Black, the media would hammer you into the ground. But there is no such reaction to a female actor saying that about a male costar.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 01:30 PM
0

Again, AVfM misjudges wildly. The site needs to die quickly and quietly, or at least delete what it's got and start from scratch with a new editorial team.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 06:45 PM
1

No, I'm to the left of one. And centaurs aren't renowned for raping and murdering women in real life. And if they were, it wouldn't be a very good name to use on a subreddit about men's rights - a movement whose members are often described as women haters. Good question though.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 06:14 PM
0

Is your name really Peter Sutcliffe, or have you just adopted the name of a man who murdered 13 women?
/r/MensRights04/01/14 11:06 AM
2

Yeah, it's quite well hidden. I've Tweeted it and Facebooked it - got to try and disseminate this stuff however we can.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 11:44 PM
2

There are a lot of excellent comments there, but I don't think Guber's is one of them. It is lengthy, and it is well-written, but it makes some points that are incorrect and I wouldn't want my name associated with, especially not as an MRA trying to correct the misconception that we're cavemen (or cavewomen). To say, "...the false idea that women were oppressed has been deeply woven into our cultural narrative and our individual brain. But it is false. It has always been false." is - at best - d…
/r/MensRights02/01/14 11:02 PM
2

That's entirely disingenuous, and also misses the point of what I said. The comment linked to - on its own - is an excellent summation of what the MRM is about.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 11:54 AM
2

I'm pleased this seems to have struck a chord with so many people. I think it might make an impact with people outside the MRM, and highlight what kind of nonsense we face. I have an idea: tonight is New Year's Eve. Social media is going to be very, very busy. Post this picture on your walls and timelines, along with the post title - let's try to get as many eyeballs on this as possible and begin 2014 with something positive for the MRM.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 07:08 PM
4

I wish that when people Googled the MRM they landed on this explanation, rather than the more likely destination of something childish, aggressive and anti-intellectual on AVFM. I think we'd get more people looking at things from our perspective. It terrifies me that they are seen as the flagship site in the MRM.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 07:03 PM
2

I'm not linking to that shit, but Google 'UK feminista', 'lose the lads mags' or 'kat banyard' and you'll find sources from every mainstream UK newspaper.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 10:50 AM
5

I don't think that showing pictures of rich, famous, attractive people with personal trainers and telling the average person that those celebrities look like shit, is positive in the slightest. What does it say to the reader? 'Give up now. These women who regularly appear on Sexiest in the World lists are weird looking. You've got no fucking hope. ' Meanwhile, the "lad's mags" say here's a good looking woman, let's appreciate her. How dare they.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 12:03 AM
0

Yes, they should, and you'll note I never claimed otherwise in my parent comment. You didn't. But you did make criticisms of the men's magazine picture that should also be levelled at women's magazines, so was curious.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 09:05 PM
2

How do you feel about the women's magazines which feature photoshopped, unrealistic, highly-sexualised pictures of men? Shouldn't Heat, Now, Closer, Cosmo, Glamour, Marie Claire et al face similar criticism for the way they objectify men as well as women?
/r/MensRights30/12/13 08:29 PM
11

Alas, this article is from six years ago - now, the crosshairs have moved very much onto men's magazines which commit the cardinal sin of glorifying women. I fear that, even if the Guardian did run something like this today, the blame for the too fat/too thin attacks would be somehow be placed on men, rather than the female writers and editors, and the women who buy this shit week-in, week-out.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 08:22 PM
6

Ah yes, but they attack each other because of us. Y'know, cos of all the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 06:12 PM
10

In fact, that image is more risque than the stuff they are trying to ban. I don't really see why you feel the need to post it here though.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 05:51 PM
54

No they haven't. UK Feminsta have made no concerted effort to ban women's magazines, nor are they relentlessly attacked by @everydaysexism.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 05:49 PM
9

I don't understand why you're getting accused of being a troll. You're not exactly saying anything inflammatory. I'm sorry that you've come to this sub and some people are attacking you.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 11:51 AM
6

MRAs don't want the right to assault women. So let's just pop that little bubble for you right now.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 09:50 AM
6

Please, for one second, imagine if a comedy film aimed at a male audience had a poster with a brass knuckles on it, with the clear implication that they will be used on a woman. This is not okay.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 09:50 AM
1

Although his conclusions are led by emotion, rather than by the FACTS he reports (typical SJW behaviour) - let's be thankful for the research and nice bank of references he did for us, which we can use in our own arguments. Highly recommend going through the comments, too. Among the shit, there are some solid arguments made.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:09 PM
-1

I absolutely agree with the suggestion. It's a sad state of affairs, but groups (like public figures) have to be vocal about things that are common sense. "So, Mr President, why haven't you denounced this terror attack?" Well of course he does - everyone does - but you have to say it. It's not something that's obvious, because of the focus given to addressing sexist policies that affect the majority of men, but the MRM is about more than just that - and fighting for the rights of gay men is one …
/r/MensRights20/12/13 11:19 AM
6

Tell that to SRS
/r/MensRights16/12/13 11:21 PM
3

I did it for myself and got 135. Then I did the exact same but checked 'female' instead of 'male' - that was the only change I made - and got 60. Bull. Fucking. Shit.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 07:35 AM
2

Some of those comments are excellent.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:34 PM
1

Alas, a LOT of people read the New Statesman and use the nonsense within as some kind of guide to the way we should all behave. Depressing, isn't it.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 09:16 AM
26

No, they didn't. That's one of the things this sub is for. To highlight discrimination against men (including media portrayals) and to challenge it.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 04:53 PM
1

Good lord, what a terrible article. Vice is renowned for having shit writers, but this guy reaches new heights of shitness And again, we see links to AVfM being used to portray us in a negative light.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 10:30 PM
3

This 'apology' still manages to demonise men. The girl that raped him was "likely perpetuating something awful that had happened to her." Even if that is true, this is meant to be a mea culpa, not another way to propagate your worldview.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 10:18 PM
2

The "rapists with anger issues" field is a little jarring.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 10:15 AM
3

No, you're not.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 07:08 PM
5

I think we should, yes. Yesterday, I posted this, which was met with... well... not much really. For the lazy, it's a fairly well-known journalist's account of the first 'MRA' he has encountered. I am using quote marks because I don't believe this guy reflects who we are. Today, Big Red has picked up on it. And yes, it matters because as much of a fool we think she is, people listen to her. And later this week, the journalist who got sent this abuse is going to write about it for The Telegraph M…
/r/MensRights30/09/13 06:48 PM
1

I agree, Mic used Nolan's behaviour to judge all MRAs, and that's not right. I guess my point is, it's frustrating that it's idiots like this that get attention and use our cause as a hook to hang their aggression on. Whether you like him or not, Mic is getting increasingly well-known (and regularly uses his own life as a source of material), so this Peter Nolan character should have had the sense to see that if he behaved in that way, he was going to damage the movement and make us all look bad…
/r/MensRights29/09/13 10:21 PM
2

Mainstream media in the UK crushes dissent.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 09:41 PM
1

When it comes to social matters the Guardian is a joke and uses writers that would fit in well on a 14-year-old's Tumblr.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 09:07 PM
-2

The comments underneath are terrifying - some real blinkered people out there.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 07:37 PM
3

Absolutely, but once the misandric cheerleaders have their say, there are some really good, logical, arguments from MRAs.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 07:01 AM
2

Yes, but if you take 5 seconds to scroll down a bit, you'll see a number of comments from men taking her to task. Thanks for contributing to the debate in a mature way though.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 07:01 AM
7

Wow. The level of inclusion. We have so much to learn. /s
/r/MensRights02/09/13 01:06 PM
2

Because a major part of what holds us back as a movement is the way we are misrepresented. If /r/feminism would actually engage in serious, earnest conversation, they would have no choice but to accept that we are pro-equality and not an anti-women group.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 07:09 AM
5

Now, will she be (rightly) sacked by the station, as would happen (rightly) to a male news anchor who beat his wife?
/r/MensRights04/08/13 10:27 PM
9

It's unfortunate, but any comment that isn't part of the jerk gets the poster banned. Imagine how much further along we would be if /r/feminism would actually engage in serious conversation with /r/mensrights, rather than just labelling us.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 07:05 PM
1

Fuck you. You're why the MRM is not taken seriously and treated as a hate group. You blinkered, close-minded prick.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 04:35 PM
0

We're not. I am an MRA and have downvoted you because I think the things you are saying are damaging to us and our fight. If I feel that way, I'm sure others do too.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 11:30 PM
4

I posted it here because, while the guy who wrote it is not an MRA (I'm not sure he is even aware of the movement), in the UK at least, the fact he's saying this stuff at all is a big deal. Our media is so crushed by liberal thought, anyone who says this sort of thing becomes a pariah. If it was someone with no online presence, it wouldn't be worth remarking on, but this guy appears in a couple of big UK newspapers, and he has a large, loyal Twitter following (www.twitter.com/angrybritain). Usua…
/r/MensRights29/07/13 06:44 PM
7

While I disagree with some of the sentiments expressed in this thread, I think it speaks volumes about our movement that questions like this are not shut down and the OP banned. We're seeing, for the most part, thoughtful and intelligent answers. If only the same could be said of other subreddits, there might be a bit more conversation going on.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 08:49 AM
1

No comments telling her this? Or would I be correct in suggesting she deleted them all and closed comments?
/r/MensRights01/07/13 06:04 PM
1

"While Powell might see this as feminism forgetting her brothers, however, it seems more likely that 'male' attributes, with all their attached prestige, are easier to assimilate than those 'female' ones which stink of instability and inferiority." Fuck. Off.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 05:47 PM
13

And I'm sure she's very proud of herself.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 09:34 PM
3

So I suppose I can expect to never be confronted by a half-naked man on the front cover of a women's magazine? And women's gossip magazines will stop showing celebrities in bikinis and declaring them 'perfect' or 'gross'? Yep. Those things are definitely going to happen.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 04:47 PM
15

This crosses more into anti-feminism than Men's Rights. It's also not a good article.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 08:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter