legalize_chicken Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
3	Ladies do you agree with this hot take? This is the major irony within the nice guy/incel mindset. Their standards and what they have to offer are always on opposite ends of the spectrum.	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/12/24 06:00 PM
1	Men's rights movement is underrated women abusers tend to use more verbal abuse as men abusers tend to use more physical abuse. How do you know women verbally abuse more than men? Is this based on a study or is this anecdotal? Do you think physical abuse and verbal abuse are equally harmful? a woman who hits a man and leaves his eye bruised is less serious than a man giving a woman a slap. Can you cite this law?	/r/MensRights	23/10/24 12:41 PM
1	Men's rights movement is underrated Thank you for your perspective! I appreciate the dialogue. You bring up a lot of valid points that I think are good examples of genuine issues highlighted in the MR movement. My overall point is that when you take all of these problems and compare them to that of women's, they are ultimately more burdened by society than men are. One of my issues with feminism is that domestic violence in straight relationships where the woman is the victim is considered more serious than vice versa or in homopa…	/r/MensRights	23/10/24 11:54 AM
-8	Why are women so focused on controlling their boyfriends free time? since it flew over your head Thank you for explaining. I wasn't familiar with the "not all men" phrase you were referencing. Not sure why you felt the need to be condescending about it though. Guess it’s ok to generalize men but the moment women are generalized then it’s the end of the world. In what way did I generalize men? My response isn't generalizing because the point I made was that both women and men are capable of being controlling.	/r/MensRights	22/10/24 01:19 PM
2	How do you deal with your insane envy of promiscuous people? Agreed. Even the greatest therapist for you will still require effort on your end to fulfill your goals and grow as a person. If you don't overcome the inability to open up, you are making your therapy mission impossible for your therapist.	/r/ExRedPill	22/10/24 01:12 PM
-14	Why are women so focused on controlling their boyfriends free time? Not sure if you're being ironic on purpose or not there, but regardless, are you suggesting that men aren't controlling?	/r/MensRights	22/10/24 12:53 PM
1	Why are women so focused on controlling their boyfriends free time? Show your gf this comment.	/r/MensRights	22/10/24 12:41 PM
-16	Why are women so focused on controlling their boyfriends free time? Generalizing? Not all women are like this + relationship dynamics vary. Some comments are speculating as if they know who you are talking about, but the truth is none of us know the full context. It's actually very normal for productive/busy people to seek out partners with similar lifestyles and monitoring each other's free time can be part of their healthy dynamic. This doesn't have to appeal to you specifically and again, there are plenty of women out there who aren't like this. My gf scrolle…	/r/MensRights	22/10/24 12:39 PM
-4	Australian court decided that women’s-only museum exhibit can exclude men because the law allows for discrimination if it promotes “equal opportunity” for a marginalised group. I'm sorry you experienced all of that. My intention wasn't to dismiss the cases of female-male abuse, but to point out why there is a lack of societal support for it in the grand scheme of things.	/r/MensRights	27/09/24 08:42 PM
-4	Australian court decided that women’s-only museum exhibit can exclude men because the law allows for discrimination if it promotes “equal opportunity” for a marginalised group. Men are both the problem and the cause in this scenario so it's tricky to provide special treatment. If we both perpetrate and experience a majority of violence, what can be provided to us that isn't already addressed by police? Compare this with women who have it much more lopsided. While they don't experience most violence, a wide majority of he violence they do experience is caused by men. Men are the common denominator in both cases and therefore don't require the same level of protection.	/r/MensRights	27/09/24 08:01 PM
-8	Australian court decided that women’s-only museum exhibit can exclude men because the law allows for discrimination if it promotes “equal opportunity” for a marginalised group. that is not okay and it has never been okay and it will never be okay. Okay then. I'm sorry you got circumcized. Have a nice day.	/r/MensRights	27/09/24 07:38 PM
-3	Australian court decided that women’s-only museum exhibit can exclude men because the law allows for discrimination if it promotes “equal opportunity” for a marginalised group. I don't know what so enshrined about banning FGM over circumcision. Things that are worse naturally have greater punishment/protection. Murder and manslaughter are both awful, but one is technically much worse than the other and therefore has harsher sentencing.	/r/MensRights	27/09/24 07:26 PM
-1	Australian court decided that women’s-only museum exhibit can exclude men because the law allows for discrimination if it promotes “equal opportunity” for a marginalised group. I'm not ignoring it, I'm just pointing out why your point loses meaning with context. Men experience more violence? True. Men commit over 90% of all violence? Also true. Why should we get special treatment when women are clearly much more victimized? The police already exist to address the problem you defined. Evidence proves women are much less equipped to defend themselves or cause violence so it makes sense to grant them extra support imo.	/r/MensRights	27/09/24 07:23 PM
-3	Australian court decided that women’s-only museum exhibit can exclude men because the law allows for discrimination if it promotes “equal opportunity” for a marginalised group. Do you actually think women commit a comparable amount of rape/SA?	/r/MensRights	27/09/24 07:16 PM
-4	Australian court decided that women’s-only museum exhibit can exclude men because the law allows for discrimination if it promotes “equal opportunity” for a marginalised group. The reason for that is because men are also almost entitely responsible for violence against both men and women.	/r/MensRights	27/09/24 07:15 PM
-3	Australian court decided that women’s-only museum exhibit can exclude men because the law allows for discrimination if it promotes “equal opportunity” for a marginalised group. it doesn't matter which is worse. Both are bad. Cutting off someone's toe is not as bad as cutting off their foot, but everyone agrees that both are bad. I think your analogy is off because not everyone agrees circumcision is bad whereas virtually everyone can acknowledge that FGM achieves nothing besides harm.	/r/MensRights	27/09/24 07:10 PM
-16	Australian court decided that women’s-only museum exhibit can exclude men because the law allows for discrimination if it promotes “equal opportunity” for a marginalised group. My claims were based on reputable sources I found on Google. Only since females can't be charged for rape unless they're stupid enough to use something to force insertion. I don't see how this discredits the reality of it all. If women don't have the same ability to rape that men do, doesn't this just reinforce the point I'm making?	/r/MensRights	27/09/24 06:55 PM
-3	Australian court decided that women’s-only museum exhibit can exclude men because the law allows for discrimination if it promotes “equal opportunity” for a marginalised group. What is so feminist about the way rape is defined here? I define it as nonconsensual sex achieved through the use of force, threats, or manipulation. Can you provide a source for your 40% claim?	/r/MensRights	27/09/24 06:52 PM
-2	Australian court decided that women’s-only museum exhibit can exclude men because the law allows for discrimination if it promotes “equal opportunity” for a marginalised group. I was speaking in a broad sense. This particular instance is extremely niche and even I agree it's silly to ban men outright. Another comment mentioned that they were forced to reverse this decision due to discrimination.	/r/MensRights	27/09/24 06:20 PM
-96	Australian court decided that women’s-only museum exhibit can exclude men because the law allows for discrimination if it promotes “equal opportunity” for a marginalised group. Female rapists sometimes target female victims too, while less than male victims, these female victims also don’t get full justice as their rapists only get a lesser charge, not rape. In UK and many other Commonwealth countries, the law defines rape as being committed by a man. So male victims don’t get full justice as their female rapist cannot be charged with rape. Females account for 1% of rape perpetrators. I am not denying the instances you reference, but they pale in comparison. I apprecia…	/r/MensRights	27/09/24 05:30 PM
-12	Australian court decided that women’s-only museum exhibit can exclude men because the law allows for discrimination if it promotes “equal opportunity” for a marginalised group. Good point. I disagree that men are marginalized in the grand scheme, but in this specific scenario, it's silly to outright ban men.	/r/MensRights	27/09/24 05:14 PM
-113	Australian court decided that women’s-only museum exhibit can exclude men because the law allows for discrimination if it promotes “equal opportunity” for a marginalised group. Do you genuinely feel targeted/threatened/disadvantaged as a man? Edit: sorry, didn't answer your question. Even in countries where progress has been made in equal pay and political representation, there still exists an imbalance in violence. Women are very marginalized in this sense.	/r/MensRights	27/09/24 05:03 PM
-260	Australian court decided that women’s-only museum exhibit can exclude men because the law allows for discrimination if it promotes “equal opportunity” for a marginalised group. Men aren't marginalized though.	/r/MensRights	27/09/24 04:31 PM
-2	Men's rights movement is underrated Extremism can ruin any good ideology. I love drinking water, but it would be silly to advocate for drinking 3 gallons of it everyday, right? Same is true for MR or feminism. Sure, some MR folks are chill, but the incels give it a bad rap. I know many awesome feminists, but miserable misandrists are just annoying. The overall difference here is men don't have a similar history of low pay, domestic violence, rape, etc. The instances for men's rights pale in comparison to that of feminism. Similar …	/r/MensRights	27/09/24 04:07 PM