TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

lenspirate Archive

View 0 posts and 135 comments by lenspirate on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Means I can't post. It's censorship for some reason.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 01:21 AM
3

Ten years after THAT, and it would always be a female principal.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 12:18 AM
-4

You seem like the type to make 6 year olds sign confessions. Seriously.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 12:17 AM
1

"And you suspected wrong. She identifies as a feminist." Who cares? We've seen the word means so many different things to people.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 12:44 AM
34

Sad that this has to go in /r/MensRights , you know?
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:25 PM
2

Nope. Re-read.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 12:31 AM
8

And it's SOY that may mimic estrogen, not Whey, so the basics are even wrong.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 04:30 PM
18

laughing Oh, you silly man. She's a GOIL!
/r/MensRights21/05/14 06:48 PM
5

I'll give you a clue as to the required body part that half the population is missing: it's got two holes.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 06:47 PM
-6

Men no need nuance.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 01:02 AM
2

Notice how the commenter said "modern".
/r/MensRights18/05/14 06:46 PM
0

The fact is, as I was stating is that the reputation is a misconception. They're very good. Again, I am saying NO, they are not one way or the other, so yes, I will continue to reject your statement that public defenders are one way or another. It's completely arbitrary who(m) you draw. Some are awful, some are wonderful. I have worked in and out of the court system for years.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 09:20 PM
1

Yes, they are notoriously bad...As in the meme about them being bad is notorious. If they said "they are all bad" then yes, you would have room to say something, but since they are talking about a reputation...
/r/MensRights13/05/14 07:55 PM
6

Then take that to court. Do you understand how this works? There is no facility for this. You'd have to have a lawyer take the case and present to a judge to even get a hearing on it.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 07:42 PM
1

Yes, they're overworked, but they're often good lawyers Often and frequently being words used...Well, that leaves a lot of times when they weren't and weren't...
/r/MensRights13/05/14 07:41 PM
2

I'm calling shenanigans. The DA/SA would have made sure that there was enough evidence to go to trial, and not just a "he said/she said" bunch of crap. A good defense attorney would have started by going after the lack of physical evidence (rape kit), and would have destroyed her story on the witness stand, since she accused you of a crime that you didn't commit. I'm not defending this story, but you say a "good defense attorney", which is exactly the opposite of what most people have access to,…
/r/MensRights13/05/14 07:40 PM
3

That's different, because usually these are no clear-cut evidenciary benefits for the accuser (video of her saying no, him using violence that leaves marks, etc). It becomes he-said, she-said, so the mud slinging happens on both sides.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 03:16 PM
3

That comment is usually made as a "Doorway" comment...like "Look at the clothes she was wearing, she obviously wanted attention, ergo, she was putting herself out there, if she hadn't this blank wouldn't have happened" It's logical in a mother sort of way, but it still doesn't address the actual crime, as it was still illegal and perpetuated against her will. In crimes where there are clear signals/violence, it's very difficult to bring in past acts/clothing at trial, because it's ludicrous.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 03:15 PM
1

That's why I do not listen fully to MRAs or Feminists, whatever their shade. I listen and speak about issues, not some group of issues. It's too overwhelming then. I just say that it's not one belief system or another. If it needs "Belief", then it's not a cause I am up for supporting. I keep it simple, I dislike gov't, the police and the way things on TV are presented as "real and better". Fanning the flames of nutfuckery just distracts from the real issues of our day: people getting less and l…
/r/MensRights08/05/14 09:48 PM
1

I'm way much older, so it makes it awkward, since they think I am just an "old man". There are so many NEW bullshit rumors out there that feminists use as fact...
/r/MensRights08/05/14 09:04 PM
1

Which is what I thought feminism was about anyway? shrugs Nobody actually seems to know. When they say they do, 11 other "feminists" tell her that she's wrong.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 08:45 PM
1

That is fine, but its about the issues. How do they feel about MHRM issues? Would they march and make calls? If not, then I doubt the "humanist" label.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 08:44 PM
2

any person i've met at school that is a SJW, or feminist, is just a normal person. Then you and I run in very different circles. I find that many of the biggest nutjobs are feminists in college. Very hard to spot them until you are in conversations with them, and they bring up the "Wage gap" or "Rape culture"...Happens often, so I would again say that this foolishness is wide-spread since I am in contact with hundreds of women across the country every year.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 08:40 PM
6

Because I don't agree with you? Interesting worldview you have there.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 05:18 PM
5

No? Why comment then if you "don't care"? That's like the 17 year old boy defense. "Whatever, I don't care. You're ugly newayz"
/r/MensRights08/05/14 03:53 PM
4

Yes? Has nothing to do with you duping another long-held poop comment that has been disproven about 10 thousand times. Mine was super-original.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 03:40 PM
4

Another "What REAL feminism is about" person?
/r/MensRights08/05/14 03:34 PM
5

OR, they say she is "too young to understand"...nevermind that 90% of their followers are the same age.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 03:34 PM
0

That's MISleading, when you lead a reader to another place besides the truth...
/r/MensRights05/05/14 12:21 AM
1

Yes, if you keep reading only the worst, the worst becomes the truth. Boy gee, is that an escapist mentality designed to poop on your fellow man by ignoring his pleas for help.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 02:50 AM
1

Don't know. I am not a very big believer in the whole age-assault thing in any case, so I am a terrible person to ask. I think it's gotten very tit-for-tat, two sides, political, everyone-goes-to-jail.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 12:05 AM
21

Did not even read the SUBTITLE of the article! "A new study reveals that men are often the victims of sexual assault, and women are often the perpetrators."
/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:04 PM
1

You do have to convince people, since you are hoping to change things. Nobody is fighting. You can not agree with someone and make your case and actually care. Going the whole FB "I don't care, whatever" route is not what I am recommending.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 07:49 PM
1

You are fighting with the wrong person. I am not saying it's fair, so calm your bones. I am saying that your way of thinking is entirely foreign to most people, so you'd better come with a really good argument. Right now, none of this is winning anyone over, and that's what you need to do.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 07:05 PM
1

I just don't think it's workable in a free society. Just my opinion.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:05 PM
-2

Yes, and you prove my point right there: neither side is going to make good decisions, so lumping it off on women to do so is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:43 PM
1

Hmmmmm, I guess it comes back to "Did you protect yourself? If you did, and accidents happen, then what would you suggest? Being able to financially-pressure her into an abortion?
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:39 PM
1

You have to remember that it's ALWAYS going to be more her issue/right. She carried the gear, and it's her body. This is just how it is. I like the line of thought, but I think we need to think of options to present, not "this is how it should be", since I don't think the state will EVER EVER EVER allow their funds to be used to support more kids when there could be a taxpayer to do it.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:31 PM
2

I just think that expecting that much thought before two people casually hook up after a bar meeting is beyond ridiculous.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 04:21 PM
3

It's still bananas.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 02:08 PM
2

If the man doesn't want the baby and the woman does, it should be up to him to prove that he used contraception and having proven it, This is where it falls apart for me..."proving contraception was used" "And this judge, *throws sploogey condom to bailiff" was the same Jimmy Hat I used. I stamp them all with the time and date"
/r/MensRights28/04/14 12:33 PM
0

This just doesn't seem workable, and a bit like a fantasy, honestly. In most cases, you are essentially creating a welfare class out of women who don't want abortions or develop an attachment for their child enough to not give it up for adoption. I'm not saying I've thought this all the way through, but it feels unworkable.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 12:30 PM
1

I would trim some of these victimhood entries. Also, some spelling, pacing issues. Perhaps "What 'isms' have achieved" and leave MHRM side listing all the things it has to achieve...
/r/MensRights28/04/14 12:20 PM
5

Possibly break your hand vs hitting them like they'll never forget.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 03:14 PM
16

Seems rational to me. Belief in some "system" to protect you is the crazy thing.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 02:10 PM
1

Just giving options, Mr/Miss Drama.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 11:31 PM
1

A writer who cares about writing and posts on reddit? Look around, there aren't many of you in that room.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 03:40 AM
7

Or "I'm a redfem/white knight looking to shame, so I set up this here handy-dandy shaming account to pretend to be..."
/r/MensRights20/04/14 03:13 AM
12

So, use "reported" against men, but use "most rapes AREN'T reported....against men...." Hey, would ya look at that.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 03:10 AM
2

Don't trust an article that can't figure out how to use affect/effect correctly. "LEO vice president Blake Pennycook said they focus on boys in that age range because it's where they believe they can affect the most change "
/r/MensRights20/04/14 03:09 AM
3

"every little slight the" slight was the word I meant. Believe me, if MRAs were mobbing feminists, it would be on reddit.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 06:30 PM
2

I can only tell you this much: I see tons of coverage of every little slight the Feminist movement finds "out there". I have never once seen a large, organized MRA anti-feminist group shutting down Feminist venues. I have seen at least a dozen of the alternate. You must not be on this sub often, since those events have had dozens of posts. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=cafe&restrict_sr=on for one...
/r/MensRights16/04/14 05:49 PM
8

Can you back this up?
/r/MensRights16/04/14 05:21 PM
5

Dont' fill in the blanks. There's no reason to white-knight Wil. He can explain himself.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 05:19 PM
9

I just tell people that I am interested in raising some awareness and helping to change some things that affect men disproportionately. I'm not an MRA. Then I start talking about issues. I avoid any feminism topics, and let them bring it up. Then I just talk about "Who wants us to shut up about issues", and let the person make up their own mind.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 05:19 PM
2

Forgive me for being lame. I had to look up SJW... St John's Wort? Social Justice Warrior? That must be it. I am so behind on all of my acronyms.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 08:12 PM
1

Wow, I am in almost none of those categories. So, is it safe to ignore me too, Wil? I used to respect him. Forget that now.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 08:02 PM
1

"Them" can just refer to the other party in a question, as it was used. It does not have to be setting up "us vs them". De-redditify for a minute....Realize that not every exchange is a soap-box moment.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 01:06 PM
5

LAWSUIT ABOUT WHAT?
/r/MensRights10/04/14 04:07 PM
6

About what?
/r/MensRights10/04/14 03:09 PM
3

There is definitely a failure in the way that women are treated as alleged victims You already lost that round. Says who? Them?
/r/MensRights10/04/14 03:09 PM
6

First off, most men ignore things about themselves that bother their self-esteem. Second, nobody said that cut men "don't like their cock" - even though you feel the need to overflex with "my cock is awesome". Got it. It's just never going to be the way it was, so the potential for it to be more is gone. That's fine, but you can never compare the two, since one is lesser and one can lift weights and fly down off of mountains. Foreskins are amazing.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 03:31 PM
8

because I thought it was a pretty normal safe procedure. So are many risky, unneeded procedures that are performed against your will. I view circumcision as a particularly nasty form of rape that leaves permanent physical scarring. I bet we're going to find that it leaves emotional scarring in a few years.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 03:28 PM
-2

She is trolling you, dude.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 01:33 AM
7

Court "blames"? No they didn't. It was one statement. OP is full of crapola, and this is part of why MRAs are seen as lame by many redditors.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 06:25 PM
1

Men and fathers are beginning to come together more i find. Its a slow but steady game and i think subs like this one are helping us reach that. Not to say that you are doing this, but one thing I despise is people point to the type of statement above and then feeling they can NOT do anything to help it along. They just sit back and wait for "things to get better".
/r/MensRights01/04/14 01:53 PM
-4

Obvious to you, perhaps. I find that adding energy to the smarmy-mess you present is like knocking my head against a tree.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 09:22 PM
-6

Well, I can see that you want to do others thinking for them, so I'm unnecessary to your internal arguments.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 07:50 PM
-8

I read it. And yes, I fit into most of those boxes. Is that "white priv" - in a sense. That's entering into a shaped argument I believe. I don't buy the interpretation, but I will admit that those things happen in every culture.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 03:09 PM
1

You'd be amazed at how quickly it can go from where you think you have control of how something is seen to "We just wanted to bring you into the office and have a talk with you. Your rep is here to see that there are no crossed signals and to represent your rights..." Seen it happen 20-30 times as a manager in the tech field.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 10:05 PM
1

No citation this time, just a warning.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 06:55 PM
0

Because that's not what every metric and interview says, that's why?
/r/MensRights27/03/14 02:19 PM
2

Did fine for me. I understood his point perfectly.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 02:18 PM
2

You will be sitting in HR in a week....
/r/MensRights27/03/14 02:15 PM
1

God, when you get to be an adult, stories like this just seem so quaint and foolish.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 12:45 AM
-1

Please, can we use periods to end sentences? And also "hating on" is just not English. Can we agree to stop using the term? And it's "heyday", not a day for hay. Proceed.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 09:45 PM
-1

And so does...every...other...culture. The West is NO different in the amount of crapola we believe in. Go to China, or Argentina or The Middle East, and then come back and tell me we are uniquely blind about sexuality.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 05:12 PM
1

Good. Add to that noise by posting ridiculous crap. Good defense.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 10:08 PM
1

If that's your answer, which equates to "Hey, post any inane, stupid thing that sounds like logic to Facebook, cause WHY NOT?" Then you, are an idiot.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 09:54 PM
-1

It's so arrogant to post bullshit like this when there are 10 million other "lessons" that could be taught. Fuck the person and their poster.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 09:40 PM
-2

I mean you should teach children to behave empathetically, value the lives of other beings, value others' desires, etc. Ummmm, DUH FUCKING DUH. I don't need a graphic poster reiterating that. Maybe don't use more resources to hang up idiotic posters?
/r/MensRights12/03/14 09:30 PM
0

Hell yeah.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 09:29 PM
6

raping away "Well, nobody told me it was wrong 48 times, just 47. Gur!"
/r/MensRights12/03/14 07:03 PM
11

It's SUUUUUUCH a stretch that it's academic and ridiculous. "Teach your kids not to rob banks" "Teach your boys not to chop their penises off. Penis chopping is no joke!" "Teach your daughters not to pee in the sink when Mr Belvedere is on because that's Daddy's show" The list is endless.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 07:02 PM
4

Some of us are old and can't read what those young whipper-snappers wrote down with their cute markers and their heart-dotted i's and lower-case j's....
/r/MensRights08/03/14 09:14 PM
1

This is SO beyond academic, and it's being applied to hundreds of thousands of people who believe in 3 different movements. Good luck on that.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 10:17 PM
4

I would like to get rid of men's rights and feminism and instead have a gender equality movement. All three exist for reasons. You can't tell people what to do or believe in because you want it that way.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 05:23 AM
11

The worst thing? That this only reached the top in /r/MensRights....And it's not "Real" news. WTF?
/r/MensRights26/02/14 11:30 PM
10

Got an email address for the professor?
/r/MensRights26/02/14 04:22 AM
2

I guess she didn't want the kid....And nobody forces her to change her name...So, those surrogate mothers must be REALLLLLLLY awesome then...
/r/MensRights22/02/14 02:49 AM
2

shrugs Who knows? What we think means a whole hill of beans in a lawsuit. What WOULD help is always posting the numbers and email of those in charge, those who pay salaries and those who we elect in those places. Continuous calls have a much better chance of doing some good.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 08:14 PM
2

Some will, most will not. What this does is limit options severely, so it's SO much harder to follow through on all the armchair QB's saying "Just sue", especially if the case looks tough, long or not profitable enough.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 08:11 PM
5

With...what money? He now has no job.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 07:29 PM
6

Hmmmmmm, did you reply to the right person?
/r/MensRights17/02/14 03:42 AM
3

Statistics please before I believe anything is going "our way" at colleges.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 03:30 AM
-1

I just ignore replies above a certain snark level, so I am not going to bother with yours.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 01:31 AM
3

Make it a joke. Tell them she helps tutor you on your math and leave it be. You won't change minds, but you can avoid their vitriol.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 02:56 PM
0

Rape culture? You know that doesn't really exist, right?
/r/MensRights06/02/14 02:25 PM
10

No one ever allows discrimination of women on pragmatic grounds, so we can't allow the discrimination of men on those grounds. This is a good point. Most of the people in the thread are conflating easy/right.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 03:56 PM
-1

Ehhhhh, I would say that there is a group that is learning this shaming method, but it is not the majority.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 07:07 PM
2

I imagine you weren't raised in a heavy estrogen environment. I was. Then, I helped coach my niece's basketball teams for years. Now I'm a fashion photographer. I can say this without a doubt: most women are absolutely horrible to each other. Not all women, but the majority. The ones who aren't? Absolute keepers.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 01:05 AM
5

I can't help you. You obviously have no real experience, or are one of those guys who lies about it.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 10:22 PM
9

I used the word misogyny 3 times in a sentence...and you still took me seriously.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 10:06 PM
1

This is called minimizing and rationalizing, and doesn't serve an argument well. Did you learn this technique when Mom and Dad fought and you had to make the peace? It's very....gamma.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 10:02 PM
2

I would say he is right, for surface situations. I know know a man alive who is as CASUALLY horrible as women are every day to each other.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 10:00 PM
2

I find your misogynistic use of misogyny, to be totally misogynistic...You're just part of the Patriarchy, rape apologist!
/r/MensRights21/01/14 09:58 PM
3

Obviously, that's part of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 02:53 AM
1

"I tend to blame things like that on men who beat their wives. The VAWA is to a proactive peace of legislation, its reactionary. Of course, from what you are telling me your situation was handled improperly but that would have a lot more of the way the local authorities handling of things than the law as a whole." It's a "piece" alright....a POS. You can minimize all you wish. The very name should tell you that it's unfair....You are welcome to use Google to find out gripes with VAWA. http://nat…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:10 PM
1

Watch out, I am a cunning linguist.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 09:59 PM
2

more women go to school, even, than men- As opposed to....femen?
/r/MensRights10/01/14 06:06 PM
-2

i don't think feminism is about Well, there ya go. Everyone thinks it's about something else, so the word becomes meaningless. Here's me being a pig: the girl holding the sign is insanely adorable.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 06:05 PM
3

Hmmmmmm, feminists "affected" my rights when I ran into some of the provisions of the VAWA act that lowered the evidenciary barrier to raiding my house and charging me with a made-up crime. Feminists supported and forced through that law. I would not say that "women" feel...I would focus on feminists. Speaking for 3 billion people is not my schtick, and making it yours will just result in making bold statements that don't apply. Extreme feminists and those who dislike men are big in 2XC. Remembe…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 05:03 AM
1

I cannot write "narcicisst" - which is usually how it comes out.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 11:52 PM
3

/r/Feminism is sometimes ok. But stick on there for a few weeks...You'll see some serious shit. /r/TwoXChromosomes is even worse. /r/MensRights has one or two hyperbolic titles, but the actual content is rarely insane.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 08:31 PM
2

Word is "err", not air.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 08:29 PM
1

TheAmazingAtheist on YouTube can give you a good crash-course on why modern feminism is retarded, if you can tolerate his obnoxiousness. It's....so....difficult...Must...punch...in...face...
/r/MensRights09/01/14 06:57 PM
13

I wouldn't say that any of these groups are arguing to be better than anyone else, just to be treated the same as their peers. I would very heatedly disagree. VAWA, etc.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 06:55 PM
2

Either you're with us, or against us. How about "I have other priorities, narcissists."?
/r/MensRights09/01/14 06:53 PM
1

And you have case evidence to point to?
/r/MensRights06/01/14 04:05 PM
3

Ad created to SELL underwear, but designed to look like "what's good for the goose" because idiots love to talk about nothing. No guy would toss an underwear model out of bed for wearing ratty undies...we aren't that shallow. This ad is for women, because the advertiser believes that women are shallow.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 01:33 PM
-4

Perhaps, lighten up /r/MensRights ? Over-reaction to every, little thing, is tiring...
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:46 PM
4

This is correct. The only recourse will be "postpartum", so to speak...after that expel happens, you can sue. That's it.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:51 PM
2

Why bother? Because "bleeding hearts" is often a stand-in for "Liberal" or "Progressive" and can be confusing. Why not just say "Someone who sympathizes with"...Is it because you realize that it sounds kind of mean?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:49 PM
-4

You sir, just zinged. Congrats.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 02:41 PM
11

What makes them bleeding hearts? You can be stupid and not a bleeding heart, or a "Lib" as the synonym seems to be and not believe in this. Big brush you got there.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 02:40 PM
-1

Just like in Feminism, there is no "us". There is a glut of men and a few women who feel similarly, and outliers who feel very differently. Like herding cats, and it will never change because it's not a focused target. Nothing wrong with that, just go to show that well-defined targets that get referenced are the key, and keeps people who want to attack "us" focused on the issues.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 01:23 AM
2

how do you justify letting people who you already know will continue to commit horrible crimes do just that? You know that it's not possible to heal them and stop them from committing crimes. You are not very good at this strawman argument thing.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 03:31 PM
2

empathy for dangerous criminal scum We're talking about people in prison. Are those two phrases the same?
/r/MensRights02/12/13 03:31 PM
-1

And you have to prove it. No, you don't. The prosecution has to prove that you acted unlawfully. heheheeeh, right. If you're white, and affluent, you do well. People, juries, DAs all make mistakes and lots of my good, innocent friends are in prison. That is one big reason that you should never just assign blame or hate to those in prison. "I've done nothing wrong and I have nothing to fear." Oh yeah, good luck with that line, pal. Works great. Something akin to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noth…
/r/MensRights02/12/13 03:30 PM
-1

And you have to prove it. Most times, you can't. So, now, big tough guy who is all tough on people in prison, you ARE one. Through no real fault of your own, you dealt with an imperfect Justice System and landed in the place where you have zero empathy, and want zero empathy shown to you. If I were you, I would say put you in there for 25-life, see ya. See how this works?
/r/MensRights02/12/13 02:11 PM
0

" If someone starts, you put them down hard and fast, any way you can." Which then leads to prison for many, and according to you, should be put there for all eternity in that 6x8 box. You just failed at your own tough guy reasoning. FAIL.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 02:02 PM
3

You don't care? Well, I don't welcome your opinion then. If you don't care, just go away, and let people with actual empathy run the world.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 01:59 PM
3

I would 50% disagree with that. First off, human minds don't do well in that env. It breaks many. That is not what prison is for, since most people in prison are not there for violent crimes. Treating them like you suggest makes them come out broken...and they commit more crimes. Rehab is the only way. Give them a reason to not recommit. I know it takes away from the manly "fuck em" aspect, but it stops the cycle.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 12:48 PM
3

Eh, I don't really aim for torture. That makes ME bad. I just want them away from the ability to make others lives torturous for the rest of theirs. That's what no-pardon is. You can never know true guilt, so I'd rather not do anything that can't be undone, without reason. Hell, you can't even trust confessions.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 08:52 AM
7

When someone is determined to have done this, I think this is one of those special "No parole" kind of cells.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 01:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter