TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

leoawesom Archive

View 0 posts and 30 comments by leoawesom on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This is a moot point. Lets say your country is going to be taken over by some oppressive regime like China. Do you really want what they have? Is it better than what you currently have? If it is how so? Yes we should continue to push for a more egalitarian society, but I assure you that doesn’t happen by sacrificing what you have for a minute chance at something better.
/r/MensRights22/10/22 12:16 AM
-1

So what are you suggesting eaiser standards for men or harder standards for women? Because from my perspective I feel standards are already pretty lax for both. Sailors only need to run 1 PFA a year and you are allowed to do alternate cardio for those that are not attached to a training command.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 12:12 AM
-1

I think this is one area where we need to have different standards. Men and women are physically different. Period. Theres just no debate. Sure some of the numbers are a litttle over the top in my opinion (I am looking at you Navy PFA) but overall the system is relatively fair. The one place I do believe it should be the same in and out is anything spec warfare related. That is just simply a different thing altogether, and as far as I am aware that is the same for both sexes. The problem is you …
/r/MensRights09/09/22 10:23 PM
9

A little late to the party, but Mens Rights to me is about advocating for more encompassing coverage of troubles that plague men. I do NOT advocate for the reduction of wonens rights and or issues that play in part. The problem is that a lot of people don’t see it that way. Men and women inherently have different issues. Some biological, some societal, and some im embedded in our media and culture. The goal should be to elevate people not put them down. Lets take some of the areas where men are …
/r/MensRights26/07/22 12:05 AM
-23

Kind of a weird strawman you made there. Does it come with wings? If you really wanna believe all women would be scared of answering what their job/career is than I assure you, you are most definitely wrong. You can disagree with this persons point of view, but lets not try to discredit everyone who comes with an opposing point of view.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:52 AM
12

Simp- Colloquial: Usually used to describe a man who forgoes their masculinity and values in the pursuit of pleasing someone (more specifically a woman). This usually results in nothing coming out of it for the “simp” because the woman in turn does not respect him or truly want anything romantic from him.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 07:03 AM
15

This is really well worded and spot on. I think the usage of any word that is meant to demean someone and is used (unironically) is pretty bad. When we use someones disposition, emotional capacity, mental aptitude, or quality of life as a means to put someone down it is often from a place of ignorance. Bitch should definitely hot be used to describe a woman in good faith, but gives context to this issue in the sense that mansplaining is offensive for a similar reason, it is meant to use ones gen…
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:01 AM
6

pretty much the whole things a PR stunt
/r/MensRights20/05/22 07:25 PM
1

Of course man, people are mad. They should be! Men especially, we all grew up under the notion that we were the provider, women stayed home, and we woild retire at 65(?) and owning a home was the goal. In little over a decades thats all changed, men no longer have to be the provider, in a lot of cases women now are hired more and earn more than their male counterparts (age 18-30 group), men are displaced in society and its need for anger. To make it worse men are expected to just believe there p…
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:54 AM
1

Oh its terrible man, like I am grateful for what the military has done for me so far and the benefits I have gained, but theres no doubt we are part of a much larger and greedier evil. I work on combat systems specifically and when you start to learn the money the military will shell out to contractors, its ridiculous. When that same money could be used else where for comprehensive healthcare, social safety nets, and better education systems. Hell evem renovating defunct barracks that havent bee…
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:42 AM
1

yeah I feel like a lot of hate of this subreddit lies in its sourness towards feminism and portrayal of women in media weather social or otherwise. Theres are tons of issues dicussed on this subreddit, but poor writing in making the female pilot the top gun in a movie that should have never gotten a sequel is moot. Even Tom Cruise didnt want to film a second top gun. As someone in the military, glorifying the military is definently not something we as a group need. It just takes a quick google s…
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:28 AM
-2

Dunno why so many angry dudes downvoting this shit, this spitting facts.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 10:38 PM
3

Im 25, I joined at 23. Im navy so my view might be different then what you have in mind. The military is great if you feel your life needs structure. You get health insurance, 3 meals a day, a roof over your head and a paycheck that adjusts to inflation and goes up the longer you are in. For any considering to join DO YOUR RESEARCH there are so many jobs in all the branches that you gotta find one that works for you. Boat lifestyle isnt everyones cup of tea, just like field work isnt mine. I thi…
/r/MensRights18/03/22 11:20 PM
7

I joined the military 2 years ago. Lot of disenfranchised young men, I try to be a good mentor for the fresh off the boat highschoolers. Im by no means old, but I try to impart so of the older brother love when I can.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 10:47 PM
20

there is a severe lack of empathy for men in todays world
/r/MensRights18/03/22 08:33 PM
12

A lot of it has to do with subliminal messaging. Women regardless of the various enviromental, sociological, or economical problems or privilege are being told they are fragile. That they are weak, and men…who are strong must be the predator as they must be the prey. Where the problem comes forward is in what I mentioned before. Are you taking a walk in the open day, inna nice suburb of new jersey, where crime is near 0%, or are you talking that same walk at night in a shady part of chicago, no …
/r/MensRights18/03/22 10:47 AM
2

I just wanted to say I am proud of you and happy you are still around. Abuse is abuse regardless of the form it stems from. I happy you have found a person who cherishes you and treats you right. Have a great day man!
/r/MensRights16/03/22 08:52 AM
1

You seem to have a lot of anger in your heart. Im really sorry someone hurt you or that you are hurting so much that you would make generalizations and assumptions about everyone based on an opinion you don’t agree with. I hope you find some peace and it does you well. Have a great rest of your day.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 12:43 PM
1

I mean I read the article again just now to confirm, but the article seems to never state any disagreement about carrying some of the burden, I believe the disagreement at hand between the two is the vastly large amount of money that 50,000 to 100,000 is. The facts is the home is paid off and they state they are putting most of it away and investing the rest. While I understand where you are coming from that the relationship up into this point has been entirely transactional I think its fair to …
/r/MensRights11/03/22 10:14 AM
1

Sure I can explain, because when you have a kid its not just about you anymore. Your life isnt just your own. If me and my wife decided to have a kid tomorrow I would most likely be supplying her entire cost of living even though we take care of things together. Now why would I do that? Because thats whats expected of me as a new dad. Role swap here. If she has the kid and wanted to work I would take the pay cut to be with my kid bearing she makes more then me. Its familial responsibility and we…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 05:09 AM
1

I mean, it absolutely is part of the question. She is putting 50,000 to the childs life. Thats a price tag regardless of how you look at it. Actually its more like 100,000 cause I suppose she gets the other 50 from her company, but I digress. Women would balk at the idea of a man saying “okay im taking time off to take care of my child I expect recompense from you.” This is the crux of the argument and what I was getting at. If her career or income is more important than a child she shouldn’t ev…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 02:29 AM
5

I mean I think my biggest problem is that it sounds like commital issues across the board. Trying to create a family while keeping incomes seperate is a nightmare in and of itself, spilting 50:50 or not. If she isn’t ready to lose her job and neither is he (assuming he becomes the stay at home dad) they just might never be. Its okay to be “spiritually married” but that dont mean shit for tax purposes, alimony, estate seperation etc. I agree that in the most pure and extreme terms that if men and…
/r/MensRights10/03/22 08:04 PM
5

Ironic, “Dont make it us vs them” wheres that same energy when other women make “All men” comments? It blows my mind when teachers try to insert there bias in logical arguement. Men in general are vicitims of domestic abuse in ways women never will be due to double standards that women will never deal with. Sure men on men domestic violence is probably good to talk about too, but really? Women suffer more domestic violence than men? Really? Men don’t report domestic violence as much as women die…
/r/MensRights08/03/22 05:55 PM
55

This comment is such a bad take. No human being is not deserving of some sort of love. Its really sad that people are built into categories of “Average” or “Elite” whatever. Someone somewhere should be allowed to be loved by whoever. Worst of all media is the exact problem with most of our society. From 10 second tic tok clips that project an unrealistic reality of someones life, to deep political messaging in everything from video games to movies. People are so ignorant to these facts and say c…
/r/MensRights03/03/22 01:08 PM
2

I mean the more you know, I’m active duty and the military allows you too enroll in there life insurance policy, but never heard of any service member getting life insurance outside of that grid. Again my point is really that men nor women should have to pay increased rates on insurance just because of their sex, especially considering when there are so many different gender specific problems that could equate to higher rates in both men and women.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 04:19 PM
1

How am I arguing in bad faith? I simply stated in response to another persons arguement on “ why should men have to pay for women services” and my answer was they shouldn’t and in reality they don’t, but thats not a segway to just randomly say women should pay more in health insurance fees because they “on average use the doctor more” Thats like saying men should pay more in life insurance cause they are more likely to die in wars, or because men are more likely to work hazardous jobs. Risk is n…
/r/MensRights24/02/22 06:38 PM
-1

Dude thats the point I am making. You legit can choose. Maybe you don’t if you get it through you work, but in most situations, like car insurance you can choose. That is deadass how insurance works. Don’t want collision insurance? Dont get it. Don’t want to pay the highest deductibles? Don’t get it. Wild how that works. I don’t want to sound like a dick, but thats how insurance works you buy the level of coverage you want.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 01:51 PM
-3

I mean… it does? For instances men are 100% the only one that can get testicular cancer should men pay more because they are part of a unique group that can get that? No they shouldn’t just as women shouldn’t have to pay more for being at risk of ovarian cancer. Atleast by the logic you are using. Obygn appts are part of normalizing proper gentialia care which btw men should get regularly as well. You don’t upcharge insurance just because as a man you could be paying for it. Thats also why there…
/r/MensRights24/02/22 01:40 PM
-9

Its because things like health are not subjective to traditional tests. Most men on average are slightly more aggressive and forward. This leads to more aggressive driving and by far more accidents by men. Women in part are usually less aggressive and more aggreable. This translates to the road as well. While you cant discriminate against gender directly, you CAN discriminate on non-subjective elements. If someone smokes your insurance goes up, if you are an alcholic? insurance goes up. You regu…
/r/MensRights24/02/22 01:12 PM
3

I think a more telling truth is how male contraceptive i.e (birth control) has been TESTED. People think men wouldnt want a birth control equivalent, but most of us would. It is just drastically harder to stop insemination when men are fertile 24/7 while women are only truly fertile a portion of the month.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 01:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter