lerocler Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
0	WoMeN cAn Do EvErYtHiNg A MaN DoEs Great argument, saying that as an answer is proof of the state of this sub	/r/MGTOW	15/07/19 12:17 AM
1	WoMeN cAn Do EvErYtHiNg A MaN DoEs Women are not, idiots are. r/gatekeeping	/r/MGTOW	14/07/19 11:01 PM
-3	WoMeN cAn Do EvErYtHiNg A MaN DoEs I summarize your 4 points in two main ideas: Women use more their phones for social stuff Women are shittier drivers Being a shit driver, valid point, fine But being addicted to a phone is different, you have to be specially idiotic to look at your phone for so long, and if you say it’s because of social reasons, she might as well be playing candy crush, which a man could also be doing. Even if you use your phone abnormally frequently, you are an IDIOT if you look at it for so long without looki…	/r/MGTOW	14/07/19 10:27 PM
-1	WoMeN cAn Do EvErYtHiNg A MaN DoEs Women can, idiots cannot. While she is in fact a woman, it is not what caused the crash, her being a idiot did.	/r/MGTOW	14/07/19 07:02 PM
-3	WoMeN cAn Do EvErYtHiNg A MaN DoEs I have not mentioned ANYTHING about her punishment for being an idiot, and while I recognize the problem you are mantioning, it is not what I am talking about. The comment I initially responded to stated that the crash happened, at least in part (according to the user), because she is a woman, and that is what I am arguing against. The crash happened because she is an idiot	/r/MGTOW	14/07/19 06:59 PM